1. Impact of Atrial Fibrillation Type on Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis: A Single-Center Analysis.
- Author
-
Yamashita Y, Sicouri S, Baudo M, Rodriguez R, Gnall EM, Coady PM, Jarrett H, Abramson SV, Hawthorne KM, Goldman SM, Gray WA, and Ramlawi B
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Retrospective Studies, Aged, 80 and over, Risk Factors, Treatment Outcome, Time Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Aortic Valve surgery, Aged, Postoperative Complications epidemiology, Postoperative Complications mortality, Survival Rate trends, Risk Assessment methods, Follow-Up Studies, Aortic Valve Stenosis surgery, Aortic Valve Stenosis mortality, Aortic Valve Stenosis complications, Aortic Valve Stenosis physiopathology, Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement methods, Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement adverse effects, Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement mortality, Atrial Fibrillation complications, Atrial Fibrillation surgery, Atrial Fibrillation mortality
- Abstract
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a recognized risk factor for mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis, but the impact of different types of AF on clinical outcomes remains unclear., Methods: This retrospective study included 982 patients divided into 3 groups: no AF, paroxysmal AF, and nonparoxysmal AF (persistent or permanent). Clinical outcomes were analyzed using inverse probability weighting and multivariate models., Results: There were 610, 211, and 161 patients in the no-AF, paroxysmal AF, and nonparoxysmal AF groups, respectively. For the entire cohort, the mean (SD) age was 82 (7.7) years, and the periprocedural, 1-year, and 5-year mortality rates were 2.0%, 12%, and 50%, respectively. After inverse probability weighting, the periprocedural mortality rate was higher in the nonparoxysmal AF group than in the no-AF group (odds ratio, 4.71 [95% CI, 1.24-17.9]). During 5 years of follow-up (median [IQR], 22 [0-69] months), all-cause mortality was higher in the nonparoxysmal AF group than in the no-AF group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.56 [95% CI, 1.14-2.14]; P = .006). The paroxysmal AF group was not associated with worse clinical outcomes than the no-AF group (HR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.81-1.49]) for all-cause mortality. Stroke rates were comparable among the 3 groups. Multivariate analysis also showed increased all-cause mortality in the nonparoxysmal AF group compared with the no-AF group (adjusted HR, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.06-1.93]; P = .018), while all-cause mortality was comparable between the paroxysmal AF and no-AF groups (adjusted HR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.75-1.33])., Conclusion: In patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis, having nonparoxysmal AF was associated with a higher risk of periprocedural and all-cause mortality compared with having no AF. Paroxysmal AF showed no such association., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Disclosure: Basel Ramlawi is a consultant for AtriCure, Boston Scientific, CORCYM, Medtronic, and Shockwave Medical. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (© 2024 The Authors. Published by The Texas Heart Institute®.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF