Back to Search
Start Over
Impact of Atrial Fibrillation Type on Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis: A Single-Center Analysis.
- Source :
-
Texas Heart Institute journal [Tex Heart Inst J] 2024 Dec 12; Vol. 51 (2), pp. e248402. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Dec 12 (Print Publication: 2024). - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a recognized risk factor for mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis, but the impact of different types of AF on clinical outcomes remains unclear.<br />Methods: This retrospective study included 982 patients divided into 3 groups: no AF, paroxysmal AF, and nonparoxysmal AF (persistent or permanent). Clinical outcomes were analyzed using inverse probability weighting and multivariate models.<br />Results: There were 610, 211, and 161 patients in the no-AF, paroxysmal AF, and nonparoxysmal AF groups, respectively. For the entire cohort, the mean (SD) age was 82 (7.7) years, and the periprocedural, 1-year, and 5-year mortality rates were 2.0%, 12%, and 50%, respectively. After inverse probability weighting, the periprocedural mortality rate was higher in the nonparoxysmal AF group than in the no-AF group (odds ratio, 4.71 [95% CI, 1.24-17.9]). During 5 years of follow-up (median [IQR], 22 [0-69] months), all-cause mortality was higher in the nonparoxysmal AF group than in the no-AF group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.56 [95% CI, 1.14-2.14]; P = .006). The paroxysmal AF group was not associated with worse clinical outcomes than the no-AF group (HR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.81-1.49]) for all-cause mortality. Stroke rates were comparable among the 3 groups. Multivariate analysis also showed increased all-cause mortality in the nonparoxysmal AF group compared with the no-AF group (adjusted HR, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.06-1.93]; P = .018), while all-cause mortality was comparable between the paroxysmal AF and no-AF groups (adjusted HR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.75-1.33]).<br />Conclusion: In patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis, having nonparoxysmal AF was associated with a higher risk of periprocedural and all-cause mortality compared with having no AF. Paroxysmal AF showed no such association.<br />Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Disclosure: Basel Ramlawi is a consultant for AtriCure, Boston Scientific, CORCYM, Medtronic, and Shockwave Medical. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.<br /> (© 2024 The Authors. Published by The Texas Heart Institute®.)
- Subjects :
- Humans
Male
Female
Retrospective Studies
Aged, 80 and over
Risk Factors
Treatment Outcome
Time Factors
Severity of Illness Index
Aortic Valve surgery
Aged
Postoperative Complications epidemiology
Postoperative Complications mortality
Survival Rate trends
Risk Assessment methods
Follow-Up Studies
Aortic Valve Stenosis surgery
Aortic Valve Stenosis mortality
Aortic Valve Stenosis complications
Aortic Valve Stenosis physiopathology
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement methods
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement adverse effects
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement mortality
Atrial Fibrillation complications
Atrial Fibrillation surgery
Atrial Fibrillation mortality
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1526-6702
- Volume :
- 51
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Texas Heart Institute journal
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 39677398
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.14503/THIJ-24-8402