Search

Background: Recent guidelines recommend direct patient observation, pressure monitoring, and sensor devices to prevent extravasation during contrast media (CM) injection. However, it is impractical in terms of time and cost to install sensors for all patients., Purpose: To identify risk factors for CM extravasations during contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in a large population and to establish criteria for placing the sensor device on patients., Material and Methods: This retrospective study included 143,556 patients who underwent CECT at our hospital between April 2012 and July 2022. We performed multivariable logistic regression analysis between patients with (n = 350) and randomly selected patients without CM extravasation (n = 350). We investigated the percentage of patients with sensor devices and their sensitivity for detecting extravasation using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis., Results: The extravasation rate was 0.27%. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the injection rate (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.33-1.95: P <0.001), catheter gauge (AOR = 3.86, 95% CI = 1.92-7.76; P <0.001), the use of anticancer drugs (AOR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.32-2.50; P <0.001), and existing catheters (AOR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.10-2.11; P  = 0.009) were significantly associated with extravasation. To achieve a sensitivity of 90%, 80%, 70%, 60%, and 50%, 80%, 65%, 50%, 40%, and 28% of all patients required the placement of a sensor device, respectively., Conclusion: Sensitivity analysis established criteria for effective placing sensor devices., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Aims: To prospectively determine whether extrinsic warming of the low-osmolality CT contrast media (Iohexol 350, Iodixanol 320, Iopromide 300, and Iopamidol 300) to 37°C prior to intravenous administration affects extravasation and allergic-like reaction rates., Materials and Methods: This large scale prospective case control study of adverse events included all the patients between the age group of 15-80 years undergoing routine contrast-enhanced computed tomographic (CECT) examinations from April 2018 to March 2020 at our institute. Ex vivo experiments were also performed to demonstrate change in contrast viscosity and fluid dynamics in relation to temperature., Results: A total of 24,379 CECTs were conducted during the study period. Extrinsic warming showed a significant decrease in extravasation rates for Iohexol 350 at flow rates <3.5 mL/sec (P=0.037). No significant difference was observed with Iopromide 300 (P=0.432). Overall, a significant decrease in allergic reactions and overall contrast-related reactions (excluding physiologic reactions) was noted (P<0.001), with Iohexol 350. However, no significant difference was found with Iopromide 300. The most common physiological reaction was a sense of warmth, more prevalent in the warmed group, aligning with ex-vivo experiments demonstrating decreased viscosity with contrast warming., Conclusions: Extrinsic warming of contrast helps reduce the incidence of allergic-like reactions and extravasations for Iohexol 350, but no significant difference was noted with Iopromide 300 even at low injection rates (<3.5 mL/sec)., (Copyright © 2024 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Intravascular administration of iodinated contrast media can cause contrast-induced acute kidney injury, especially in patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m². The American College of Radiology (ACR) and the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines recommend renal function screening based on medical history, but their effectiveness has been under-evaluated. This retrospective study included 2,560 consecutive adult outpatients without eGFR measurements within 180 days before contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) at a single tertiary hospital from July through September 2023. On the day of CT, they underwent eGFR tests and 1.1% had an eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m², preferentially with histories of gout and renal disease. According to the ACR and ESUR strategies, 16.9% and 38.8% of all study participants were positive, respectively, identifying 92.6% and 96.3% of patients with renal insufficiency. Both strategies demonstrated high negative predictive values. These results support selective renal function screening before contrast-enhanced examinations., Competing Interests: Activities not related to the present article: Yoon SH holds stocks and stock options of Medical IP. Other authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose., (© 2024 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences.)

Purpose: To determine whether switching to contrast media based on the sharing of N-(2,3-dihydroxypropyl) carbamoyl side chain reduces the recurrence of iodinated contrast media (ICM)-associated adverse drug reactions (ADRs)., Materials and Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 2133 consecutive patients (mean age ± SD, 56.1 ± 11.4 years; male, 1052 [49.3%]) who had a history of ICM-associated ADRs and underwent contrast-enhanced CT examinations. The per-patient and per-exam-based recurrence ADR rates were compared between cases of switching and non-switching the ICM from ICMs that caused the previous ADRs, and between cases that used ICMs with common and different carbamoyl side chains from ICMs that caused the previous ADRs. Downgrade rates (no recurrence or the occurrence of ADR less severe than index ADRs) were also compared. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis were additionally performed., Results: In per-patient analysis, switching of ICM showed a lower recurrence rate (switching, 10.4% [100/965] vs. non-switching, 28.4% [332/1168]), with the adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 0.27 (95% CI: 0.21, 0.34; p < 0.001). The result was consistent in PSM (OR, 0.29 [95% CI: 0.22, 0.39]; p < 0.001), IPTW (OR, 0.28 [95% CI: 0.22, 0.36]; p < 0.001), and in per-exam analysis (5.5% vs. 13.8%; OR, 0.32 [95% CI: 0.27, 0.37]; p < 0.001). There was lower per-exam recurrence (5.0% [195/3938] vs. 7.8% [79/1017]; OR, 0.63 [95% CI: 0.47, 0.83]; p = 0.001) and higher downgrade rates (95.6% [3764/3938] vs. 93.3% [949/1017]; OR, 1.51 [95% CI: 1.12, 2.03]; p = 0.006) when using different side chain groups., Conclusion: Switching to an ICM with a different carbamoyl side chain reduced the recurrent ADRs and their severity during subsequent examinations., Clinical Relevance Statement: Switching to an iodinated contrast media with a different carbamoyl side chain reduced the recurrent adverse drug reactions and their severity during subsequent examinations., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.)

Objectives: To investigate whether high concentration iodinated contrast media (CM), compared with low concentration CM, could reduce pain and discomfort levels in patients who had level II and III venous conditions., Methods: This prospective, single-center study enrolled patients who had level II and III venous conditions and underwent abdominal contrast-enhanced CT scan between July 2021 and February 2022. The venous condition to establish peripheral venous access for CM injection was graded using the Intravenous Access Scoring system, of which level II and III indicated poor venous condition and difficult venous access. Patients received iomeprol 400 in high concentration group and ioversol 320 in low group at an identical iodine delivery rate of 1.12 gI/s. The primary outcomes were pain and comfort levels. The secondary outcomes included adverse events and image quality. Patients rated pain intensity via Numerical Rating Scale and comfort level via Visual Analogue Scale with higher scores indicating higher levels of pain and discomfort. Quantitative and qualitative image assessment were compared between two groups. Continuous variables were compared using Student's t test or Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were compared using χ 2 test, χ 2 test for trend or Fisher's exact test., Results: A total of 206 patients (mean age, 60.13 ± 12.14 years; 81 males) were included with 99 in the high concentration group and 107 in the low concentration group. The high group had significantly lower pain scores (median 1 [IQR: 0-2] vs 2 (IQR 2-4), p < 0.001) and comfort scores (1 [IQR: 0-3] vs 3 [IQR: 2-5], p < 0.001) than the low group. Incidence of CM extravasation did not significantly differ (1.0 % vs 4.5 %, p = 0.214). No hypersensitivity reaction was observed. Qualitative assessment showed higher clarity scores of intrahepatic hepatic artery and portal vein in the high group. Quantitative assessment results were comparable between two groups., Conclusion: High concentration iodinated CM could lower pain intensity and improve comfort levels without comprising image quality of CT scan. High concentration CM is a preferable choice in patients with poor venous conditions during contrast-enhanced CT scan., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The sensitivity to ionizing radiation is increasing by age of development for some malignant tumors. Therefore, children have higher risk to radiation induced tumors due the high cellular rate of proliferation and long lifespan probability. The risk is also increase with increase the effective and organ doses. Computed tomography (CT) exposed pediatric patients to higher radiation dose during multiphase image acquisition, repeated exams, for follow-up procedures. This research intended to estimate the radiogenic risks and effective radiation doses resulted from CT enhanced contrast for abdomen and pelvis. 126 (66 (62.3%) males, 60 (47.7%) females) pediatric patients underwent CT enhanced abdominal examination at Medical Imaging Department at King Khalid Hospital and Prince Sultan Center for Health Services, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia. The average and range of pediatric age (years) is 11.6 ± 5.0 (0.1-17). The mean, standard deviation, and range of the volume CT air kerma index (C VOL (mGy) and the air kerma length product (P KL , mGy.cm) were 9.8 ± 9.4 (2.1-45.8) and 1795 (221-3150) per abdominopelvic procedure, respectively. The mean and range of the effective dose (mSv) per procedure are 26.9 (2.4-59.1). The effective dose is higher compared to the most previously published studies. The effective dose per pediatric abdomen and pelvis with contrast procedure suggest that the patient dose is not optimized yet. Because the chest and pelvis region contain sensitive organs that are irradiated repeatedly, dose optimization is crucial., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All authors declare that there is no conflict of Interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study aimed to explore the incidence of and potential risk factors for adverse drug reactions (ADRs) after non-ionic iodinated contrast media (NICM) administration for CT exams in out-patient settings in China., Materials and Methods: A total of 473,482 out-patients who underwent intravenous NICM between January 1st, 2017, and Dec 31st, 2021, were retrospectively enrolled from three institutions. The occurrence of ADRs and clinical information were recorded. Chi-square test, Poisson regression, and logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate potential ADR risk factors and correlation with demographics, season, and NICM type., Results: Among the 473,482 patients (mean age 55.22 ± 14.85; 253,499 male) who received intravenous NICM, the overall ADR incidence was 0.110% (522 of 473,482), with 0.099% acute-related drug reactions (469 of 473,482) and 0.0004% serious ADRs (two of 473,482). Iopromide was associated with a higher risk of acute ADRs. Late ADRs were more frequently observed with iodixanol 320. Multi-level logistic regression of patients with acute ADRs and a control group (matched 1:1 for age, gender, NICM, prescriber department, and institution) showed that summer (adjusted OR = 1.579; p = 0.035) and autumn (adjusted OR = 1.925; p < 0.001) were risk factors of acute ADRs. However, underlying disease and scanned body area were not related to a higher ADR incidence., Conclusion: The use of NICM for out-patients is in general safe with a low ADR incidence. The type of contrast medium (iopromide) and the seasons (summer and autumn) were associated with a higher risk of acute ADRs. Late ADRs were more often observed with iodixanol., Clinical Relevance Statement: In comparison to in-patients, out-patients may be exposed to higher risk due to a lack of extensive risk screening, less nursing care, and higher throughput pressure. Safety data about NICM from a large population may complement guidelines and avoid ambiguity., Key Points: • The incidence and risk factors for adverse events after using non-ionic iodinated contrast media are complex in out-patients. • Non-ionic iodinated contrast media are safe for out-patients and the overall incidence of adverse drug reactions was 0.110%. • There is a higher risk of acute adverse drug reactions in summer and autumn., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.)

Background: Optimising first time success of peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) insertion and reducing intravenous (IV) complications in cancer patients undergoing contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) is vital to ensure vascular access preservation and diagnostic accuracy. The aim of this study was to test the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) evaluating a novel perforated PIVC compared to a standard PIVC., Methods: A single centre, parallel-group, pilot RCT was conducted between March and May 2020. Adult participants diagnosed with cancer were randomised to a non-perforated PIVC (standard care) or a PIVC with a novel perforated design (intervention) for the administration of IV contrast. There were two primary outcomes: (1) feasibility of an adequately powered RCT with pre-established criteria; and (2) all-cause PIVC failure. Secondary outcomes included: first insertion success, modes of PIVC failure, dwell time, contrast injection parameters (volume and injection rate), contrast enhancement, radiographer satisfaction and adverse events., Results: Feasibility outcomes were met, except for eligibility (⩾90%) and recruitment (⩾90%). In total, 166 participants were screened, 128 (77%) were eligible and of these 101/128 (79%) were randomised; 50 to standard care and 51 to intervention. First time insertion rate was 94% (47/50) in standard care and 90% (46/50) in intervention. The median dwell time was 37 minutes (interquartile range (IQR): 25-55) in standard care and 35 minutes (IQR: 25-60) in the intervention group. There was one PIVC failure, a contrast media extravasation, in the intervention group (1/51; 2%). The desired contrast injection rate was not achieved in 4/101 (4%) of participants; two from each group. Radiographers were satisfied with the contrast flow rate., Conclusions: This pilot RCT suggests perforated PIVCs provide expected flow rate, with no evidence of differences in contrast enhancement to non-perforated PIVCs. The feasibility of conducting a larger powered RCT was demonstrated., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: NG: none; EW: none; NM reports Griffith University and the University of Queensland have received, on her behalf, investigator-initiated research grants from manufacturers of vascular access device products (3M, Becton Dickinson, Eloquest and Cardinal Health), speaker fee from 3M; and a consultancy payment for expert advice from Becton Dickinson; LM: none; KD: none; COB: none; AV: none; MT: none; SK: declares funds received by employer for educational consultancies with BD medical and ITL Biomedical unrelated to this study.

Purpose: To investigate the relationship between contrast medium administration and long-term mortality and renal function in patients with septic acute kidney injury (AKI)., Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective, propensity-matched cohort study involving 1521 adult patients admitted with septic shock. Patients with septic AKI who underwent contrast or non-contrast CT scans were enrolled. The primary outcomes were the rates of 90-day mortality and dialysis within 90 days. The secondary outcomes included worsening of AKI, in-hospital mortality, and maintenance of dialysis after 90 days., Results: During the study period, 609 patients with septic AKI were identified; 220 (36.1%) underwent contrast CT and 389 (63.9%) underwent non-contrast CT. After propensity score matching, 133 pairs were obtained. There were no significant differences between the contrast and non-contrast CT groups in 90-day mortality (54.9% vs. 58.6%, P = 0.579), dialysis within 90 days (6.8% vs. 8.3%, P = 0.655), worsening AKI (2.3% vs. 3.0%, P = 0.706), in-hospital mortality (10.6% vs. 14.4%, P = 0.369), or maintenance of dialysis after 90 days (0.0% vs. 0.8%, P > 0.99)., Conclusions: The administration of intravenous contrast medium was not associated with long-term mortality, deterioration of renal function, or dialysis in patients with septic AKI., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Previous research on the necessity to reduce the viscosity of contrast media (CM) by either prewarming CM before injection during computed tomography (CT) or by using less concentrated CM has yielded conflicting results. In addition, there is limited evidence on patient comfort., Objectives: The aim of the study was to examine if prewarming CM, with varying CM concentrations, is superior to CM at room temperature, with respect to patient comfort and safety in CT., Materials and Methods: All elective patients scheduled for contrast-enhanced CT scans at Maastricht University Medical Center+ between October 27, 2021 and October 31, 2022 were eligible for inclusion when a questionnaire evaluating patient comfort was completed. This 1-year period was divided into 4 intervals (4 groups): group 1 (370 mg I/mL, 37°C), group 2 (370 mg I/mL, room temperature), group 3 (300 mg I/mL, 37°C), and group 4 (300 mg I/mL, room temperature). All CT scans were performed using state of the art equipment (Siemens Healthineers; SOMATOM Force and SOMATOM Definition AS, Forchheim, Germany). Contrast media injections were performed using a dual-head power injector (Stellant; Bayer Healthcare, Berlin, Germany) and individualized to body weight and/or tube voltage, depending on the CM protocols. After the CT scan, patients completed a questionnaire covering the primary outcomes comfort, pain, and adverse events such as feelings of heat, nausea, vomiting, itchiness, urticaria, difficulty breathing, dizziness, goosebumps, or an odd taste. Technicians were asked to report any adverse events, including extravasation and allergic-like reactions. The secondary outcome involved attenuation (in Hounsfield unit, HU), which was evaluated by assessing the HU of the coronary arteries for vascular CT, and liver enhancement in portal venous CT. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used for continuous scale outcomes and χ 2 tests for examining adverse events., Results: Results showed no significant differences examining comfort score ( P = 0.054), pain sensation ( P = 0.469), extravasation ( P = 0.542), or allergic-like reaction ( P = 0.253). Significant differences among the 4 groups were found with respect to heat sensation and dizziness ( P = 0.005 and P = 0.047, respectively), showing small effect sizes. All other adverse effects showed no significant results. No significant differences were observed in coronary attenuation among the 4 groups in coronary CT angiography ( P = 0.113). When analyzing attenuation in portal venous CT scans, significant differences were found among the 4 groups ( P = 0.008)., Conclusions: Administrating prewarmed CM is nonsuperior compared with CM at room temperature in relation to patient comfort and safety, regardless of CM concentration. These findings suggest that prewarming CM before usage is unnecessary, which will improve the efficiency of daily clinical workflow and brings environmentally friendly benefits., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: This article has not received any funding, and the authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors declare relationships with the following companies: C.M. and B.M. receive personal fees (speakers bureau) from Bayer. All outside the submitted work. J.E.W. reports institutional research grants from Agfa, Bayer, Bard, GE, Philips, Optimed, and Siemens and personal fees (speakers bureau) from Siemens and Bayer, all outside the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Objectives: This study aimed to identify the incidence and risk factors for contrast-associated acute kidney injury nephropathy (CA-AKI) in patients undergoing contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CCT) in the emergency department., Materials and Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, patients aged 18 and older who visited the emergency department and underwent CCT between January and February 2022 were included. The Mehran score, calculated from patient data, was used to assess risk. CA-AKI development was determined by measuring serum creatinine (SCr) levels 48-72 h post-contrast administration., Results: The study included 532 patients, with a mean age of 57 ± 19 years; 53.2% were male. CA-AKI developed in 16% of cases, 5.82% required hemodialysis, and 7.9% died. The Mehran score was the only significant predictor of CA-AKI development. Patients with a Mehran score of 16 or higher had a 161-fold increased risk of developing CA-AKI compared to those with a score of 5 or lower. The model achieved a 91.3% correct classification rate. Logistic regression analysis showed that CA-AKI significantly increased mortality risk by 15.7 times., Conclusion: The Mehran score, originally developed for predicting CA-AKI risk post-coronary intervention, is also effective for predicting CA-AKI risk after CCT. While CA-AKI is a significant factor affecting mortality, it is not the sole cause of death (Nagelkerke R2 value 0.310).

Objectives: It is uncertain whether modern iodine-based or gadolinium-based contrast media (CM) administration can lead to increased symptoms in patients with myasthenia gravis., Methods: A systematic search in Medline was conducted for studies describing the symptomatology of myasthenia gravis patients before and after receiving intravenous (IV) CM and having a matched control group of myasthenia gravis patients who did not receive IV CM., Results: Three retrospective studies were selected with a total of 374 myasthenia gravis patients who received iodine-based CM and a total of 313 myasthenia gravis patients who underwent unenhanced CT and served as controls. Pooling of the data from the three retrospective studies showed that in 23 of 374 patients, increased symptoms after iodine-based CM administration were described (6.1%). Increased symptomatology also occurred in 11 of 313 patients after unenhanced CT (3.5%). When looking more deeply into the data of the three studies, conflicting results were found, as two articles did not find any relationship between CM and myasthenia gravis symptoms. The remaining study only found a significant increase in symptomatology within 1 day after CT scanning: seven patients (6.3%) in the contrast-enhanced CT group and one patient (0.6%) in the unenhanced CT group (p = 0.01)., Conclusions: There is limited evidence on the relationship between CM and myasthenia gravis symptoms. In the vast majority of myasthenia gravis patients, CM are safe. Probably, in less than 5% of the patients, iodine-based CM administration may lead to increased severity of the symptoms within the first 24 h after administration., Clinical Relevance Statement: Be aware that intravenous administration of iodine-based contrast media can lead to an increase of symptoms in patients with myasthenia gravis within the first 24 h. This can probably happen in less than 5% of the patients., Key Points: • It is unclear whether modern contrast media can lead to increased symptoms in myasthenia gravis patients after intravenous administration. • There seems to be a small risk of increased myasthenia gravis symptoms within 24 h after intravenous administration of iodine-based contrast media, probably in less than 5% of the administrations. • Gadolinium-based contrast media are safe for patients with myasthenia gravis., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Objectives: To compare the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) between hospitalized children who received intravenous contrast media for imaging examinations and those who did not., Methods: This retrospective cohort study enrolled patients aged 0-18 years with serum creatinine levels before and after imaging examinations from 2015 to 2020 at Beijing Children's Hospital. Participants were classified into an exposure group or a control group. Log-binomial regression analysis was used to estimate the adjusted risk ratio (aRR) value for the association between exposure to contrast media and consequential AKI. After which, inverse probability treatment weighting was used to reduce systematic differences in baseline characteristics among the groups. Moreover, subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed. Finally, multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for pediatric AKI., Results: In total, 3061 pediatric patients were included in the analyses (median age, 4.5 [IQR, 1.3-8.9] years, 1760 males). According the KDIGO definition of AKI, the incidence of AKI in the exposure group, and the control group were 7.4% and 6.5%, respectively; furthermore, the aRR was 1.35 (95% CI: 1.31-1.39). In patients underwent CT, the risk of AKI in the exposure group of contrast media increased compared with the control group and the aRR was 1.39 (95% CI: 1.09-1.78). However, it is not observed in patients underwent MRI (aRR: 1.36; 95% CI: 0.96-1.95). According to our subgroup analysis of pediatric patients aged ≥ 2 years (aRR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.05-1.82) and sensitivity analysis (aRR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.08-1.61), the risk of AKI in the exposure group was greater than that in the control group. An increased risk to exposure to contrast media was seen in females (aRR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.05-1.89) rather than males (aRR: 1.30, 95% CI: 0.99-1.70). According to the multivariate logistic regression analyses, the baseline eGFR (OR: 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01-1.03) and comorbidities (OR: 2.97; 95% CI: 1.89-4.65) were risk factors, while age (OR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.84-0.91) was a protective factor against AKI., Conclusion: The evidence from the present study suggested that the increased risk of AKI in hospitalized children induced by intravascular contrast should not be ignored., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Aim: To examine the relationship between fasting prior to contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) and adverse reaction (AR) in patients with allergies history., Materials and Methods: Patients with allergies history who underwent CECT from January 2014 to December 2020 (713 cases with iodinated contrast media (ICM)-related allergy history and 27045 cases with unrelated allergies history) were retrospectively analyzed. The occurrence of ICM-related AR and patient information were recorded. The relationship between fasting and AR and emetic complications was analyzed., Results: There was no statistical difference in the overall incidence of AR and emetic complications between fasting group and non-fasting group (P>0.05) and fasting was not an influence factor for overall AR occurrence in patients with both ICM-related and unrelated allergies history. However, the incidence of severe AR in fasting group was higher than that in non-fasting group (P=0.01) in patients with unrelated allergies history. The AR incidence in fasting group was higher than that in non-fasting group (P=0.022) when receiving abdominal examinations in patients with unrelated allergies history. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of AR with different occurrence time between fasting group and non-fasting group (P>0.05) in patients with both ICM-related and unrelated allergies history., Conclusions: Fasting was associated with higher incidence of severe AR and was associated with higher AR incidence when receiving abdominal examinations in patients with unrelated allergies history. Fasting did not have effects on the occurrence time of AR in patients with allergies history. These provided new guidance for usage of ICM in patients with allergies history., (Copyright © 2024 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Iopamidol is a non-ionic, water-soluble iodine contrast agent that is considered safe for intravenous or intra-arterial administration and is widely used both in the general population and in patients undergoing oncological treatment. While adverse reactions to iopamidol have been documented, to date, no pulmonary and gastric hemorrhages induced by iopamidol have been reported in oncology patients. We report the first case of this complication., Case Presentation: We report the case of a 60-year-old woman with marginal zone lymphoma who was receiving antineoplastic therapy. As part of the investigation for the condition, she underwent chest enhancement CT with iopamidol. Shortly thereafter(within five minutes), she experienced hemoptysis and hematemesis. She was intubated and admitted to the intensive care unit. Pre- and post-contrast images demonstrated the course of the hemorrhage. Flexible bronchoscopy and gastroscopy on the following day showed no active bleeding, and the patient recovered completely after antiallergy treatment. We speculate that contrast-induced hypersensitivity was the most likely cause of the transient pulmonary and gastric bleeding., Conclusion: Although rare, the complications of iopamidol, which may cause allergic reactions in the lungs and stomach, should be considered., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

To prospective research the efficacy of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in predicting contrast medium extravasation and secondary cerebral hemorrhage after stent thrombectomy in acute ischemic cerebral infarction. Ninety-two patients with acute ischemic stroke who underwent intra-arterial thrombolysis in our hospital from December 2019 to January 2022 have opted as the study subjects. DECT was performed immediately after stent thrombectomy. Images were generated through the image workstation and routine diagnosis was performed 24 hours after the operation. To analyze the diagnostic value of To analyze the diagnostic value of DECT, and to explore the diagnostic status of lesions with hemorrhagic transformation or increased hemorrhage and their correlation with iodine concentration. (1) 68 situations were confirmed, 56 positive and 12 negative with detection rates of 10.71% for hemorrhage, 75.00% for contrast agent extravasation, and 14.29% for extravasation combined with hemorrhage; (2) DECT diagnosed 8 cases of postoperative bleeding and 44 cases of extravasation of contrast media and 4 cases of extravasation of contrast media with hemorrhage ; The accuracy of DECT in diagnosing postoperative hemorrhage was 96.43%. The accuracy of diagnosis of extravasation was 96.43%. (3) The mean iodine concentration of lesions with increased hemorrhage or hemorrhagic transformation was higher compared to those without; (4) There was a correlation between hemorrhagic transformation or increased hemorrhage and iodine concentration. Dual-energy CT (DECT) can accurately distinguish the extravasation of contrast agent and secondary cerebral hemorrhage, and can predict the increased bleeding and bleeding transformation, with good diagnostic value and good predictive efficacy.

Background: Since the mid-20th century, contrast agents have been widely used in radiology due to their ability to provide high-definition radiographic images and greater precision in diagnostic exams. Different types of contrast agents are used in image diagnosis, namely radiological media. Despite being considered safe, there are still uncertainties about their safety profile, interactions, and incidence of adverse drug reactions in real-world settings., Objective: To characterise the pattern of adverse events, during 7 years, in a radiology unit., Methods: We performed a retrospective observational and descriptive study at an Image Center in Portugal between August 2012 and October 2019. A total of 77,449 computed tomography (CT) were registered, and from those 15,640 cases of iopromide were used as a contrast agent. The authors have accessed, under the authorization, the data of adverse events and procedures after the event., Results: Most of the hypersensitivity events were immediate or with a short time of onset, with the majority of cases developing events with skin involvement and mild degree, where the most common events were papules (n = 60), pruritus (n = 42), erythema (n = 27) and urticaria (n = 14). Severe events, including hypersensitivity, were mainly represented by vomiting (n = 11), stridor (n = 8), breathing difficulties (n = 7) and syncope (n = 3). Abdominal-pelvic CT exam presented a higher frequency of adverse events., Conclusion: Despite all the current information about iopromide usage, the utilization of this agent is not abstent of risks and its safety profile not fully established. Most frequent symptoms were local, as skin adverse events, including papules, pruritus and erythema. Common medications used to treat or control adverse events were frequently hydrocortisone, clemastine and methylprednisolone.

Introduction: In collaboration with the Department of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, our study aims to review the outcomes of and propose an improved workflow for the management of patients with prior hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast media (ICM)., Method: Outpatients coming for contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) were stratified into 3 categories (definite, unconfirmed and inaccurate) based on likelihood of their contrast hypersensitivity label. Patients could be offered a different ICM, receive the same ICM, or be referred to an allergist for further evaluation. There were 4 outcomes: (1) alternative ICM tolerated; (2) same ICM tolerated again; (3) patient developed a hypersensitivity reaction to either alternative or original ICM; and (4) CECT was deferred until assessment by an allergist. Comparison was made pre- and post-intervention to see if patient outcomes were improved., Results: There were 132 patients who made a total of 154 visits (90.3% had documented contrast hypersensitivity). Post-intervention, the number of visits postponed for premedication decreased (81.0% to 34.7%). There was a reduction in hypersensitivity reactions (from 42.9% to 14.3%). Of the 12 patients assessed by the allergist, 6 could continue using the same or alternative ICM, 4 were advised to abstain from further contrast administration and 2 were pending testing with a third agent., Conclusion: Active intervention by the radiologist can decrease the number of postponed, converted or cancelled CECT studies as well as reduce the number of adverse allergic-like events. Direct collaboration between radiologist and allergist for specific cases may be helpful in patients who will likely need future/repeated CECTs.

Aim: To evaluate the occurrence and severity of allergic reactions to iodinated contrast media (ICM), including associated risk factors and the impact of pre-medication., Materials and Methods: Data on patients who had experienced allergic reactions during outpatient computed tomography (CT) examinations between January 2014 and September 2018 were analysed retrospectively. Response severity was assessed according to validated criteria. A control group was selected among individuals who underwent CT during the study period and did not experience allergic reactions., Results: Screening of 36,920 CT studies revealed 74 (0.2%) individuals with systemic reactions to ICM. No significant differences in patient characteristics were found among patients who experienced mild (n=54), moderate (n=17), or severe (n=4) reactions. Previous ICM allergy was reported in 10 patients (13.3%). Patients with a history of ICM allergy had mild (9/10) or moderate (1/10) reactions, with one individual showing decreased intensity of the allergic response compared to a previous event. Within the control group, four patients (4%) had previous ICM allergy. In these individuals, lack of allergic reactions could not be attributed to pre-medication. All patients with severe reactions did not have a prior history of ICM allergy., Conclusion: Severe allergic reactions to ICM are rare, lack significant risk factors, and do not appear to be impacted by pre-medication. The findings presented herein highlight the need for prospective work that will re-evaluate the yield of pre-medication protocols., (Copyright © 2021 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To study the effectiveness of the topical application of dry cold or dry hot compresses in the treatment of non-ionic iodinated contrast extravasation injury., Methods: A multicenter, consecutive, non-probabilistic experimental clinical trial was carried out between June 2017 and September 2020. The study included patients with extravasation of non-ionic iodinated contrast, administered through an injector pump during a computed tomography procedure. In the experimental group, a dry heat pack was applied in the first hour of treatment followed by a dry cold pack; the control group received only the cold pack. The size of the extravasation, pain, details of contrast administration, anthropomorphic data and the patient's clinical history were recorded. Follow-up was carried out at 24h., Results: 65 patients were included, of which 32 were treated with cold pack only and 33 with heat and cold. In those receiving heat treatment, 30 (90.9%) patients had complete resolution, while those with cold treatment only had complete resolution in 13 (40.6%); p<0.001 and odds ratio 14.6 (95% CI 3.7-58.1). With the initial application of dry heat, local inflammation improved by 1.2% more than in those with dry cold treatment only., Conclusions: The application of dry heat during the first hour of treatment was more effective, by more than 50 percentage points, at diffusing contrast and modulating the inflammatory process., (Copyright © 2021 Tissue Viability Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

BACKGROUND. Extrinsic warming of iodinated CT contrast media to body temperature reduces viscosity and injection pressures. However, studies examining the effect of extrinsic warming on clinical adverse events are limited in number and provide conflicting results. Therefore, consensus practice recommendations have been sparse. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to compare rates of extravasation, allergic and allergiclike reactions, and physiologic reactions between iohexol 350 mg I/mL warmed to body temperature (37°C) versus this agent maintained at room temperature. METHODS. This retrospective study compared adult patients who received CT examinations using IV iohexol 350 that had either been warmed to body temperature or maintained at room temperature. At our institution, contrast media had historically been warmed to body temperature before a protocol change unrelated to this investigation. Information on the patient and CT examination was extracted from the electronic medical record. Adverse events, including extravasations, allergic and allergiclike reactions, and physiologic reactions, were compared between groups. RESULTS. A total of 3939 patients received contrast media warmed to body temperature before the protocol change; 3933 patients received contrast media at room temperature after the protocol change. The body temperature group experienced 11 (0.28%; 95% CI, 0.14-0.50%) adverse events, all extravasations; the allergic and allergic-like reaction rate was 0.00% (97.5% CI, 0.00-0.09%). The room temperature group experienced 17 (0.43%; 95% CI, 0.25-0.69%) adverse events: 13 (0.33%; 95% CI, 0.17-0.56%) extravasations and four (0.10%; 95% CI, 0.03-0.26%) allergic and allergiclike reactions. No physiologic reaction occurred in either group. The two groups were not different in terms of overall reaction rate ( p = .19), extravasation rate ( p = .69), allergic and allergiclike reaction rate ( p = .06), or physiologic reaction rate ( p > .99). Logistic regression adjusting for patient and CT characteristics (age, sex, conventional CT vs CTA, contrast media volume, injection location) showed no significant association of patient group and adverse reaction rate (odds ratio, 2.19; 95% CI, 0.68-7.00). Multivariable regression modeling showed an excess of 0.27 adverse events per 100 patients within the room temperature group, which is below a 0.6% noninferiority margin. CONCLUSION. The data suggest that maintaining iohexol 350 at room temperature is noninferior to warming the agent to body temperature before injection. CLINICAL IMPACT. The resources involved to prewarm iohexol 350 before injection may not be warranted.

Background: Diseases of the bowel are not always displayed on conventional abdominal computed tomography (CT). The studied oral contrast agent aims to improve this., Purpose: To investigate whether the use of a novel oral contrast for abdominal CT enables the same diagnostic advantages as seen in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)., Material and Methods: Twenty-five consented volunteers drank up to 1400 mL of a stable, drinkable foam. Comments on acceptance and side effects were noted immediately and 24 h later. Foam palatability was documented through interviews, and distribution in the small bowel by Hounsfield units from the CT software. The CT results were compared with age- and sex-matched controls, pretreated according to routine. A non-enhanced abdominal CT protocol of lowest possible radiation dose was used. External referees evaluated all data obtained., Results: Foam was considered odd to swallow, and fullness was reported by all volunteers after 950 mL. Five had difficulties in drinking the last 320 mL and two abstained from it. All adverse symptoms were mild. The distribution in the small bowel was on par with standard agents. Foam density revealed stability with intraluminal values of around -550 HU from stomach to terminal ileum, satisfying the requirement of a great bowel lumen-to-wall contrast. External reviewers re-evaluated all our data, and one predicted the foam to offer a potential for improved diagnostics., Conclusion: A CT true-negative bowel filling agent was formulated, with high acceptance, few side effects, and a potential to mimic T1-weighted MRI images.

Background Although the historical risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) after intravenous administration of contrast media might be overstated, the risk in patients with impaired kidney function remains a concern. Purpose To investigate whether intravenous contrast media administration during CT is associated with a higher risk of AKI and further hemodialysis compared with the risk in patients undergoing unenhanced CT. Materials and Methods This retrospective study evaluated patients who underwent contrast-enhanced or unenhanced CT in five Taiwanese emergency departments between 2009 and 2016. The outcomes were AKI within 48-72 hours after CT, AKI within 48 hours to 1 week after CT, or further hemodialysis within 1 month after CT. The associations between contrast media exposure and outcome were estimated by using an overlap propensity score weighted generalized regression model. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Results The study included 68 687 patients (median age, 68 years; interquartile range, 53-74 years; 39 995 men) with ( n = 31 103) or without ( n = 37 584) exposure to contrast media. After propensity score weighting, contrast media exposure was associated with higher risk of AKI within 48-72 hours after CT (odds ratio [OR], 1.16; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.29; P = .007) but no significant risk at 48 hours to 1 week after CT (OR, 1.00; 95% CI: 0.93, 1.08; P = .90). Among patients with eGFR less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , exposure to contrast media was associated with a higher AKI risk (48-72 hours after CT: OR, 1.36; 95% CI: 1.09, 1.70; P = .007) (48 hours-1 week after CT: OR, 1.49; 95% CI: 1.27, 1.74; P < .001) and a higher risk of hemodialysis (OR, 1.36; 95% CI: 1.09, 1.70; P = .008). For patients with eGFR greater than 45 mL/min/1.73.m 2 , contrast media exposure was not associated with higher AKI risk ( P > .05). Conclusion Contrast-enhanced CT was associated with higher risk of acute kidney injury and further hemodialysis among Taiwanese patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 but not those with an eGFR of more than 45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Background It is unclear whether steroid premedication is an effective means of preventing repeat allergic-like reactions in high-risk patients with a previous allergic-like reaction to iodinated contrast material (ICM). Purpose To compare the effectiveness of ICM substitution (ie, using iohexol in a patient with a previous iopromide reaction) with 12- and 2-hour steroid premedication for preventing repeat acute allergic-like reactions in high-risk patients. Materials and Methods This retrospective study identified all high-risk (ie, having a previous allergic-like reaction) adult and pediatric patients who underwent a contrast-enhanced CT examination at the institution from June 1, 2009, to May 9, 2017. Prophylactic treatments and repeat reactions were identified using chart review. The effectiveness of prophylactic treatments on repeat reaction rates was examined with multivariable regression models that used generalized estimating equations. Results A total of 1973 high-risk patients who underwent 4360 subsequent ICM-enhanced CT examinations were included. Of the 4360 examinations, a total of 280 allergic-like reactions occurred (6%) in 224 of the 1973 patients (11% of patients), with only 19 of 280 reactions (7%) that were more severe than the previous reaction being demonstrated. After adjustment, patients who received a different ICM with and without steroid premedication had a significantly lower rate of repeat reactions than did patients who received steroid premedication and the same ICM (same ICM and steroid premedication: 80 of 423 examinations [19%]; different ICM and no steroid premedication: 10 of 322 examinations [3%]; odds ratio [OR], 0.14 [95% CI: 0.06, 0.33]; P < .001; different ICM and steroid premedication: five of 166 patients [3%]; OR, 0.12 [95% CI: 0.04, 0.36]; P < .001). When examining the first scan only, patients who received the same ICM had a similar risk of repeat reactions regardless of whether they received steroid premedication (steroid premedication: 44 of 172 patients [26%] vs no premedication: 73 of 298 patients [25%]; OR, 1.00 [95% CI: 0.64, 1.57]; P = .99). Conclusion In this cohort, using an iodinated contrast material (ICM) substitution was more effective for preventing repeat allergic-like reactions than using steroid premedication and the same ICM that caused the previous reaction. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Davenport and Weinstein in this issue.

Objective: This study sought to evaluate rates of acute kidney injury in patients undergoing contrast-enhanced computerized tomography for acute stroke in the emergency department (ED) before and after the cessation of creatinine screening., Methods: This retrospective study compared ED patients receiving contrast-enhanced imaging for suspected acute stroke with and without protocolized creatinine screening. The primary outcome was CIN, defined as an increase in serum creatinine of 0.3 mg/dl within 48 hours or 50% above baseline within 7 days after contrast administration. Secondary outcomes consisted of CIN based on other definitions, renal impairment greater than 30 days from contrast administration, hemodialysis, and mortality. Outcomes were compared using difference of proportions and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals., Results: This study included 382 subjects, with 186 and 196 in the screening and post-screening cohorts, respectively. No significant differences were observed for CIN (7.0% vs 7.1%, difference 0.1% [95% CI -5.6-5.1%], OR 1.02 [95% CI 0.47-2.24]), renal impairment greater than 30 days post-contrast (8.4% vs 7.5%, OR 0.88 [0.38-2.07]), or mortality (index visit: 4.8% vs 2.6%, OR 0.51 [0.17-1.57], 90-day follow-up: 6.7% vs 4.0%, OR 0.58 [0.22-1.53]). No patients from either group required hemodialysis., Conclusions: The elimination of creatinine screening prior to obtaining contrast-enhanced computerized tomography in patients with suspected acute stroke did not adversely affect rates of CIN, hemodialysis, or mortality at a comprehensive stroke center., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The objective of this study is to identify essential aspects influencing radiation dose in computed tomography [CT] of the chest, abdomen and pelvis by intraindividual comparison of imaging parameters and patient related factors. All patients receiving at least two consecutive CT examinations for tumor staging or follow-up within a period of 22 months were included in this retrospective study. Different CT dose estimates (computed tomography dose index [CTDIvol], dose length product [DLP], size-specific dose estimate [SSDE]) were correlated with patient's body mass index [BMI], scan length and technical parameters (tube current, tube voltage, pitch, noise level, level of iterative reconstruction). Repeated-measures-analysis was initiated with focus on response variables (CTDIvol, DLP, SSDE) and possible factors (age, BMI, noise, scan length, peak kilovoltage [kVp], tube current, pitch, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction [ASIR]). A univariate-linear-mixed-model with repeated-measures-analysis followed by Bonferroni adjustments was used to find associations between CT imaging parameters, BMI and dose estimates followed by a subsequent multivariate-mixed-model with repeated-measures-analysis with Bonferroni adjustments for significant parameters. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. We found all dose estimates in all imaging regions were substantially affected by tube current. The iterative reconstruction significantly influenced all dose estimates in the thoracoabdominopelvic scans as well as DLP and SSDE in chest-CT. Pitch factor affected all dose parameters in the thoracoabdominopelvic CT group. These results provide further evidence that tube current has a pivotal role and potential in radiation dose management. The use of iterative reconstruction algorithms can substantially decrease radiation dose especially in thoracoabdominopelvic and chest-CT-scans. Pitch factor should be kept at a level of ≥1.0 in order to reduce radiation dose., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction: Acute kidney injury (AKI) after intravenous contrast administration for computed tomography (CT) occurs infrequently, but certain patients may be susceptible. This study evaluated AKI incidence among emergency department (ED) patients with pre-existing chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing CT exams., Methods: This retrospective cohort study in an integrated healthcare system included ED patients previously diagnosed with CKD stages 3-5 (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 milliliters per minute per 1.73 meters squared over at least three months), undergoing CT exams with or without intravenous contrast, from January 1, 2013-December 31, 2017. We excluded patients with CT prior to (30 days) or following (14 days) index CT and missing serum creatinine (sCr) measurements. We applied propensity score matching, and then multivariable regression adjustment for post-CT ED disposition and ED diagnosis, to calculate adjusted risk of AKI. Secondary patient-centered outcomes included 30-day mortality, end-stage renal disease (ESRD) diagnosis, and dialysis initiation., Results: Among 103,573 eligible ED patients undergoing CT, propensity score matching yielded 5,589 pairs. Adjusted risk ratio (ARR) for AKI was higher overall for contrast-enhanced CT (1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.43-1.79). However, secondary outcomes were infrequent: 19/5,589 non-contrast vs 40/5,589 contrast patients with new dialysis initiation at 30 days (adjusted risk 0.3% vs 0.7%; adjusted risk reduction 0.4%; 95% CI, 0.1%-0.7%)., Conclusion: In ED patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing CT, intravenous contrast was associated with higher overall adjusted risk of AKI, but patient-centered secondary outcomes were rare. The clinical significance of transient kidney injury after CT is unclear, although patients with advanced chronic kidney disease appear to have elevated risk.

Aim: To map current contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) pathways, develop a risk-stratified pathway, and model associated costs and resource use., Materials and Methods: Phase 1 comprised multicentre mapping of current practice and development of an alternative pathway, replacing pre-assessment of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) with a scan-day screening questionnaire for risk stratification and point of care (PoC) creatinine. Phase 2 measured resource use and analysis of routinely collected data, used to populate a model comparing the costs of current and risk-stratified pathways in Phase 3., Results: Site variation across a range of processes within the clinical care pathway was identified. Data from a single centre suggested that 78% (n=347/447) could have avoided their pre-scan laboratory test as they did not have post-contrast acute kidney injury (AKI) risk factors. Only 24% of outpatients who underwent computed tomography (CT) would have identified risk factors, which would have prompted a scan-day PoC test. There was a 94% probability that the risk-stratified pathway was cost-saving, with an estimated 5-year potential cost saving of £69,620 (95% CI: -£13,295-£154,603). Although the cost of a laboratory serum creatinine test is cheaper than the PoC equivalent (£5.29 versus £5.96), the screening questionnaire ruled out the need for a large majority of the eGFR measurements specifically for the CT examination., Conclusion: The present study proposes an alternative pathway, which has the potential to improve the efficiency of the current CT pathway. A multicentre appraisal is required to demonstrate the impact of embedding this new pathway on a wider NHS level, particularly in light of new diagnostic guidance (DG37) published by NICE., (Copyright © 2020 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Intravenous iodinated contrast is a commonly used diagnostic aid to improve image quality on computed tomography. There exists a small risk of post-contrast acute kidney injury in patients receiving IV contrast. One of the biggest risk factors for developing PC-AKI is the presence of pre-existing renal dysfunction, making it important to measure the renal function prior to contrast administration. Point of care (POC) devices offer a quick estimation of renal function, potentially improving workflows in radiology departments., Method: Two POC devices were evaluated, the Nova StatSensor and Abbott iSTAT. Patients undergoing routine radiological investigations had blood collected and analysed by a POC method and the laboratory method (Beckman AU5800). The two values were analysed and compared. Renal function was calculated using eGFR via the CKD-EPI result. eGFR values were stratified as high risk (eGFR < 30), moderate risk (eGFR 30-59) and low risk (eGFR ≥ 60)., Results: One hundred eighty-six patients were included in the study. One hundred one patients underwent the Abbott iSTAT analysis, 139 patients underwent Nova StatSensor analysis, and 53 had both. Statistical analysis revealed that the StatSensor R 2 value was 0.77, and coefficient variation was 10.65%. iSTAT had a R 2 value of 0.83 and coefficient variation of 7.36%. The POC devices did not miss any high-risk patients but underreported eGFR values in certain patients., Conclusion: POC devices are moderately accurate at detecting renal impairment in patients undergoing radiological investigations. They seem to be a good screening tool; however, any low eGFR values should be further examined.

Background: Large data analyses confirm the relative safety of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), except for those with advanced renal failure. However, the prevalence of post-contrast acute kidney injury may be masked by acute kidney functional recovery (AKR) in unstable inpatients, irrespective of contrast-enhanced imaging., Methods: In this work we aimed to assess AKI and AKR along with need for dialysis and mortality, among inpatients undergoing contrast-enhanced or non-enhanced CT. We performed a large-scale retrospective data analysis using propensity score matching (PSM) that compared patients undergoing contrast-enhanced and non-enhanced imaging. We also performed a subgroup analysis of subjects stratified by baseline renal function., Results: A total of 41,456 patients were analyzed. PSM resulted in well-balanced groups. AKR occurred substantially more often than AKI among hospitalized patients following CT imaging, especially among those with low baseline renal function. Yet, in this population, whereas the rate of AKI significantly increased, the rate of AKR significantly decreased following contrast-enhanced studies as compared to patients that underwent non-enhanced CT. A significantly higher proportion of patients with baseline advanced renal failure that underwent contrast-enhanced imaging required dialysis., Conclusions: The increased incidence of AKI and AKR as seen in patients with lower pre-imaging kidney function possibly suggests that both entities reflect impaired renal functional reserve. Unstable kidney function in inpatients, as demonstrated by rates of AKR and AKI, is an important confounder which requires attention in similar observational studies on the renal effects of contrast media and of various other renal injurious events., (© 2021 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: Contrast-induced nephropathy is a well-recognized acute complication in cancer patients, but the long-term effects of repeated contrast exposure are not known. We analyzed the association of the number of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) examinations and other clinical factors with decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in colorectal cancer survivors., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively queried a prospective surgical colorectal cancer database to identify patients with stage I or II cancer who underwent resection in 2007 - 2013 and were alive for at least 3 years. eGFR was calculated before and 3 years after the surgery with ≥ 20% decline relative to baseline defined as significant and used as the primary outcome. The association of clinical factors with the primary outcome was analyzed using logistic regression., Results: Only 256 patients with the median follow-up of 65 months had sufficient clinical data for analysis. Median eGFR decline at follow-up was 3.0 mL/min/1.73m 2 or 4% change from baseline. 47 patients (18%) had ≥ 20% reduction in eGFR, which was not associated with the number of CECT examinations. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that increasing age (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00 - 1.06), presence of diabetes (OR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.18 - 4.61), and longer operation time (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01 - 1.07) were independently associated with a higher likelihood of ≥ 20% eGFR decline at 3 years., Conclusion: Older age, diabetes, and longer operating time, but not cumulative contrast exposure were found to be associated with worse long-term renal outcomes following surgical resection in patients with early-stage colorectal cancer who survived 3 years.

Competing Interests: The authors report no relevant financial relationships which, in the context of their contributions, could be perceived as a potential conflict of interest.

Background: Contrast encephalopathy is a rare complication of carotid artery stenting (CAS). Contrast encephalopathy is a diagnosis of exclusion that often needs to be distinguished from high perfusion syndrome, cerebral haemorrhage, subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH), cerebral infarction and so on., Case Presentation: In this study, we report on a 70-year-old man who was admitted to the hospital with transient ischaemic attacks presenting paroxysmal weakness of limbs in the previous 2 years. He had severe stenosis of the left internal carotid artery diagnosed by digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and underwent CAS. Two hours after the operation, the patient developed paralysis of the right upper limb, unclear speech, fever and restlessness. Emergency skull computed tomography (CT) showed swelling and a linear high-density area in the left cerebral hemisphere. To clarify the components of this high-density area in the traditional CT, the patient had spectral CT, which made the diagnosis of the leakage of contrast clear. After 1 week of supportive treatment, the patient improved., Conclusions: Spectral CT can easily distinguish the components of high-density areas on traditional CT, which is haemorrhage, calcification or iodine contrast leakage. Therefore, spectral CT is worth consideration for the differential diagnosis of complications of vascular intervention.

Background: The overall risk of postcontrast acute kidney injury (PC-AKI) after computerized tomography (CT) is negligible, likely because of the small volume of injected iodinated contrast media required. However, the safety of contrast media-enhanced CT in patients with advanced renal functional impairment, an established major risk factor for PC-AKI, is unknown., Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective study using large data analysis of hospitalized patients at a single center. Adults undergoing CT or magnetic resonance imaging were included in the study and were stratified by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (≤30 or >30 mL/min/1.73 m) and by either contrast-enhanced or nonenhanced imaging. Only patients with serial determination of creatinine before and after imaging were included. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data between groups were analyzed and compared using univariate analysis, propensity score matching, and multivariate logistic regression analysis., Results: A total of 22,319 imaging studies were included. Patients with an eGFR of 30 mL/min/1.73 m or lower undergoing contrast-enhanced CT (n = 403) had an increased risk to develop PC-AKI than did similar patients undergoing enhanced or nonenhanced magnetic resonance imaging (n = 96) or nonenhanced CT (n = 1576) or patients undergoing contrast-enhanced CT with a preprocedural eGFR higher than 30 mL/min/1.73 m (n = 9173). These findings remained robust after propensity matching for demographic, procedural, and clinical parameters. Multivariate regression analysis of all patients undergoing CT with preimaging eGFR of 30 mL/min or lower (n = 1979) revealed that iodine-based contrast enhancement increased the likelihood of post-CT AKI by 51% (confidence interval, 1.23-2.05)., Conclusion: Although radiocontrast-enhanced CT is considered safe in most hospitalized patients and in ambulatory settings, the risk of PC-AKI remains significant among inpatients with substantial preimaging renal functional impairment. Caution is warranted using iodine-based enhanced CT in hospitalized patients with an eGFR of 30 mL/min/1.73 m or lower.

Purpose:  Reducing contrast media injection speed while maintaining iodine flux is a promising workaround to lower or avoid contrast media-related discomfort during CT examinations. This approach demands contrast media with a higher concentration to guarantee excellent image quality. It remains unclear whether these concentration changes affect the patient's experience. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different concentrations of intravenous iodinated contrast media on patient discomfort during and after contrast media delivery., Materials and Methods:  Patients were randomized to receive either Iomeprol 400 mg/ml (group A) or 300 mg/ml (group B) during routinely scheduled CT examinations at our department. The iodine delivery rate and injection time were kept constant in both groups. After examination, study subjects completed a digital questionnaire on different CM-related sensation items using digital visual analogue scales., Results:  253 consecutive patients were enrolled in a 6-month period. Most of the patients reported heat sensation in both groups (mean VAS: 5.3 mm in group A vs. 5.0 mm in group B, p = 0.5). Taste sensation also did not differ significantly between both groups (2.4 mm vs. 2.0 mm, p = 0.08). Pain sensation was reported to be significantly lower in group B patients (1.3 mm vs. 1.0 mm, p = 0.005), even though pain sensation in general was reported on a very low level. Other injection-related sensations were rarely reported., Conclusion:  Patient-reported discomfort during intravenous injection of high-concentration contrast media (400 mg/ml) was low and only marginally different when compared to the injection of contrast media with a lower concentration. The injection of highly concentrated contrast media showed comparable overall patient acceptance, allowing a reduction of the injection speed and volume during examinations., Key Points:   · Patient-reported, contrast-related discomfort was very low in this study.. · High-concentration contrast media (HCCM) showed comparable overall patient acceptance.. · HCCM allow a reduction of injection speeds while keeping iodine flux constant.., Citation Format: · Vahldiek JL, Schaafs LA, Niehues BK et al. Effect of Different Iodine Concentrations on Patient-Reported Discomfort in Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography: A Prospective Comparative Trial. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2020; 192: 945 - 951., Competing Interests: J.L. Vahldiek: grants from Merit MedicalL.A. Schaafs: nothing to discloseB.K. Niehues nothing to discloseB. Hamm: grants from Abbott, grants from Actelion Pharmaceuticals, grants from Bayer Schering Pharma, grants from Bayer Vital, grants from BRACCO Group, grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, grants from Charité research organisation GmbH, grants from Deutsche Krebshilfe, grants from Dt. Stiftung für Herzforschung, grants from Essex Pharma, grants from EU Programmes, grants from Fibrex Medical Inc., grants from Focused Ultrasound Sugery Foundation, grants from Fraunhofer Gesellschaft, grants from Guerbet, grants from INC Research, grants from InSightec Ltd., grants from IPSEN Pharma, grants from Kendle/MorphoSys AG, grants from Lilly GmbH, grants from Lundbeck GmbH, grants from MeVis Medical Solutions AG, grants from Nexus Oncology, grants from Novartis, grants from Parexel CRO Service, grants from Perceptive, grants from Pfizer GmbH, grants from Philipps, grants from sanofis-aventis S.A., grants from Siemens, grants from Spectranetics GmbH, grants from Terumo Medical Corporation, grants from TNS Healthcare GmbH, grants from Toshiba, grants from UCB Pharma, grants from Wyeth Pharma, grants from Zukunftsfond Berlin (TSB)S.M. Niehues: grants from Canon Medical Systems, grants from Bayer Healthcare, grants from Guerbet, grants from Bracco, grants from Teleflex Medical GmbH, (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Objectives: Contrast nephropathy risk has been increasing in cancer patients. Nephrotoxic side effects of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor/receptor (anti-VEGF/R) drugs used in oncologic treatment are also prominent. The purpose of this study was to identify the possible association among anti-VEGF/R drugs use and development of the contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients with cancers., Methods: A total of 92 patients were included in this prospective cross-sectional study. Patients whose glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of < 50 ml/min, hemoglobin of < 10 g/dl, and eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) score of ≥ 2 and had received nephrotoxic drugs were not included in the study. Blood samples were collected baseline at pre computed tomography (CT) and day 2, day 3 and day 7 later CT imaging. CIN was defined as either an increased serum creatinine value of 0.5 mg/dl or increased 25% to baseline. CIN frequency between groups receivingand not receiving anti-VEGF/R was compared using the chi-squared test. CIN frequency between bevacizumab and other anti-VEGF/R was also analyzed., Results: There were 39 patients in the anti-VEGF/R (+) group and 53 patients in the anti-VEGF/R (-) group. Eleven patients (28%) in the anti-VEGF/R (+) group and 3 patients (5.6%) in the anti-VEGF/R (-) group had CIN (p = 0.006). In the anti-VEGF/R (+) group, 23 patients received bevacizumab (combined with FOLFOX/FOLFIRI), while 16 patients received other anti-VEGF/R (sunitinib, axitinib, regorafenib, aflibercept) effective treatments. CIN ratio in patients who received bevacizumab or other anti-VEGFR therapy was similar (p = 0 = 50). Of the patients, one patient had acute kidney injury leading to death., Conclusion: CIN was significantly more frequent in cancer patients who receiving anti-VEGF/R drugs than those not receiving anti-VEGF/R drugs.

Objectives: Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is one of the leading causes of new-onset renal failure in hospitalized patients. Statin has been evaluated for its protective effect against CI-AKI but rarely in patients receiving intravenous (IV) administrations of iodine-based contrast media for enhanced computed tomography (CT)., Methods: In total, 12,371 patients who underwent contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic CT were retrospectively reviewed and stratified into statin users and statin nonusers. Subgroup analyses comparing high-intensity statins with low- to moderate-intensity statins were conducted within statin users and similar comparisons were performed within statin users stratified based on baseline eGFR., Results: Overall, CI-AKI events did not occur less in statin users compared with non-statin users (p = 0.342). Within statin users, CI-AKI events did not decrease in high-intensity statin users compared with low- to moderate-intensity statin users (p = 0.355). Moreover, no significant difference in CI-AKI events was found between high-intensity statin users and low- to moderate-intensity statin users even after stratifying the patients with baseline eGFR., Conclusions: Collectively, statin was not significantly associated with the risk of CI-AKI events in patients undergoing contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic CT and high-intensity statins did not show significant association with CI-AKI over low- to moderate-intensity statins in the subgroup analysis., Key Points: • Statin is not associated with risk of CI-AKI events in patients undergoing intravenous administration of contrast-enhanced CT. • CI-AKI incidence among high-intensity statin users was not significantly different from that of low- to moderate-intensity statin users.

Objectives: To investigate if low-keV virtual monoenergetic images (VMI 40keV ) from abdominal spectral detector CT (SDCT) with reduced intravenous contrast media application (RCM) provide abdominal assessment similar to conventional images with standard contrast media (SCM) dose., Methods: 78 patients with abdominal SDCT were retrospectively included: 41 patients at risk for adverse reactions who received 44 RCM examinations with 50 ml and 37 patients who underwent 44 SCM examinations with 100 ml of contrast media (CM) and who were matched for effective body diameters. RCM, SCM images and RCM-VMI 40keV were reconstructed. Attenuation and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of liver, pancreas, kidneys, lymph nodes, psoas muscle, aorta and portal vein were assessed ROIs-based. Contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) of lymph nodes vs aorta/portal vein were calculated. Two readers evaluated organ/vessel contrast, lymph node delineation, image noise and overall assessability using 4-point Likert scales., Results: RCM were inferior to SCM images in all quantitative/qualitative criteria. RCM-VMI 40keV and SCM images showed similar lymph node and muscle attenuation ( p = 0.83,0.17), while for all other ROIs, RCM-VMI 40keV showed higher attenuation ( p ≤ 0.05). SNR was comparable between RCM-VMI 40keV and SCM images (p range: 0.23-0.99). CNR of lymph nodes was highest in RCM-VMI 40keV ( p ≤ 0.05). RCM-VMI 40keV received equivalent or higher scores than SCM in all criteria except for organ contrast, overall assessability and image noise, where SCM were superior ( p ≤ 0.05). However, RCM-VMI 40keV received proper or excellent scores in 88.6/94.2/95.4% of the referring cases., Conclusions: VMI 40keV counteract contrast deterioration in CM reduced abdominal SDCT, facilitating diagnostic assessment., Advances in Knowledge: SDCT-derived VMI 40keV provide adequate depiction of vessels, organs and lymph nodes even at notable CM reduction.

Purpose: To determine if endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) performed within 72 h after contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) increases contrast-induced nephrotoxicity (CIN) risk in patients with abdominal complaints., Method: This single-center retrospective cohort study included consecutive adult patients with abdominal complaints who underwent CECT between October 1, 2016, and June 30, 2019 at an emergency department (ED). CIN was diagnosed based on serum creatinine (SCr) level >0.5 mg/dL within 72 h after CECT or that increased >25 % compared to pre-CECT level. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine independent risk factors for CIN, including age, sex, body mass index, comorbidities, medication, pre-CECT SCr level >1.5 mg/dL, and ERCP performed within 72 h after CECT. For persistent CIN, SCr level was obtained after 3 months at the earliest and compared to data obtained within 72 h after ERCP and CECT., Results: Of 1457 patients with CECT, 90 (6.2 %) underwent ERCP within 72 h after CECT and 93 (6.4 %) developed CIN. Multivariate analysis revealed that ERCP performed within 72 h after CECT (odds ratio, 3.31; 95 % confidence interval, 1.74, 6.29; p < 0.001) and pre-CECT SCr level >1.5 mg/dL (odds ratio, 9.86; 95 % confidence interval, 5.08, 19.2; p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for CIN. Of 93 patients with CIN, 10 (11 %) had persistent CIN. No specific factors were correlated with persistent CIN in the 3-month time frame., Conclusion: ERCP performed within 72 h after CECT and pre-CECT SCr level >1.5 mg/dL are associated with CIN development., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: This study aimed to determine the impact of preoperative exposure to intravenous contrast for CT and the risk of developing postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery., Methods: This prospective, multicentre cohort study included adults undergoing gastrointestinal resection, stoma reversal or liver resection. Both elective and emergency procedures were included. Preoperative exposure to intravenous contrast was defined as exposure to contrast administered for the purposes of CT up to 7 days before surgery. The primary endpoint was the rate of AKI within 7 days. Propensity score-matched models were adjusted for patient, disease and operative variables. In a sensitivity analysis, a propensity score-matched model explored the association between preoperative exposure to contrast and AKI in the first 48 h after surgery., Results: A total of 5378 patients were included across 173 centres. Overall, 1249 patients (23·2 per cent) received intravenous contrast. The overall rate of AKI within 7 days of surgery was 13·4 per cent (718 of 5378). In the propensity score-matched model, preoperative exposure to contrast was not associated with AKI within 7 days (odds ratio (OR) 0·95, 95 per cent c.i. 0·73 to 1·21; P = 0·669). The sensitivity analysis showed no association between preoperative contrast administration and AKI within 48 h after operation (OR 1·09, 0·84 to 1·41; P = 0·498)., Conclusion: There was no association between preoperative intravenous contrast administered for CT up to 7 days before surgery and postoperative AKI. Risk of contrast-induced nephropathy should not be used as a reason to avoid contrast-enhanced CT., (© 2020 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objectives: To determine the incidence of post-contrast acute kidney injury (PC-AKI) and presumed contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) following contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) with intravenous application of a reduced dose of the iso-osmolar contrast agent iodixanol in cancer patients with chronic kidney disease., Methods: 198 oncology patients with a baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60ml/min/1.73m2 undergoing a total of 237 CECTs using a reduced dose of 60ml iodixanol were retrospectively analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed for the entire cohort and subgroups. The effect of additional risk factors on the occurrence of PC-AKI was evaluated., Results: The overall PC-AKI incidence was 6.3%. Excluding patients with concurrent medical conditions known to directly and independently impact kidney function and patients with AKI preceding the CT-scan resulted in a presumed CI-AKI incidence of 3.8%. No permanent post-contrast worsening of renal function and no AKI treatment were required. Subgroups considering baseline eGFR yielded PC-AKI incidences of 4.6% (eGFR 45-60ml/min/1.73m2, n = 130), 7.4% (eGFR 30-45ml/min/1.73m2, n = 95) and 16.7% (eGFR <30ml/min/1.73m2, n = 12). Additional patient related risk factors did not show any significant effect on the occurrence of PC-AKI., Conclusions: Low incidences of PC-AKI/CI-AKI suggest that a reduced dose of an iso-osmolar contrast agent is safe in high-risk oncological patients with impaired renal function., Competing Interests: We acknowledge that Marius Horger acted as a consultant to GE Healthcare and received compensation from GE Healthcare for scientific presentations. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Introduction: Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is associated with high risks of morbidity and mortality. Hyperbilirubinemia might have some renal protection but with no clear cutoff value for protection. Related studies are typically on limited numbers of patients and only in conditions of vascular intervention., Methods: We performed this study to elucidate CI-AKI in patients after contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CCT). The outcomes were CI-AKI, dialysis and mortality. Patients were divided to three groups based on their serum levels of total bilirubin: ≤1.2 mg/dl, 1.3-2.0 mg/dl, and >2.0 mg/dl., Results: We enrolled a total of 9,496 patients who had received CCT. Patients with serum total bilirubin >2.0 mg/dl were associated with CI-AKI. Those undergoing dialysis had the highest incidence of PC-AKI (p<0.001). No difference was found between the two groups of total bilirubin ≤1.2 and 1.3-2.0 mg/dl. Patients with total bilirubin >2mg/dl were associated with CI-AKI (OR = 1.89, 1.53-2.33 of 95% CI), dialysis (OR = 1.40, 1.01-1.95 of 95% CI) and mortality (OR = 1.63, 1.38-1.93 of 95% CI) after adjusting for laboratory data and all comorbidities (i.e., cerebrovascular disease, coronary artery disease, peripheral arterial disease, and acute myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, gastrointestinal bleeding, cirrhosis, peritonitis, ascites, hepatoma, shock lung and colon cancer). We concluded that total bilirubin level >2 mg/dl is an independent risk factor for CI-AKI, dialysis and mortality after CCT. These patients also had high risks for cirrhosis or hepatoma., Conclusion: This is the first study providing evidence that hyperbilirubinemia (total bilirubin >2.0 mg/dl) being an independent risk factor for CI-AKI, dialysis and mortality after receiving CCT. Most patients with total bilirubin >2.0mg/dl had cirrhosis or hepatoma., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Intravenous (IV) contrast material is used extensively for CT and MRI scans done in emergency departments (ED). Its use is essential to make many critical diagnoses in ED patients. While adverse reactions can occur, newer research has added to our knowledge of IV contrast media tolerance and safety leading to improved and more liberal guidelines for intravenous contrast use. The updated information described in this review article indicates how intravenous contrast can be used safely in more patients, more expeditiously and with fewer precautions than with prior guidelines. This review article explains the basis for the new recommendations for intravenous contrast material use and describes indicated precautions and preparations to avoid adverse reactions for iodinated agents used for CT and gadolinium agents for MRI.

Purpose: To identify the spectrum of patients who undergo disproportionate recurrent computed tomography (CT) imaging, and to explore the cumulative effects of radiation exposure and intravenously injected contrast agents in these patients., Methods: This retrospective study investigated all patients who had undergone 40 or more CT scans at a tertiary care center between 2007-2017., Results: Fifty-six patients who had undergone a median of 47 (range: 40-92) CT scans were included. The main reason for CT scanning in all patients was oncological, and 55 patients (98.2 %) had metastatic disease. Twenty-six patients (45.6) had received chemotherapy, 35 (62.5 %) radiation therapy, 38 (67.9 %) targeted therapy, 12 (21.4 %) liver tumor microwave ablation, 44 (78.6 %) major surgery, and 34 (60.7 %) had participated in a therapeutic trial. Mean cumulative effective dose was 187.4 mSv (range: 120.7-278.4 mSv). Median estimated radiation-induced lifetime attributable risk (LAR) of cancer incidence was 1.0 % (range: 0.20-2.36 %). Mean estimated radiation-induced LAR of cancer mortality was 0.68 % (range: 0.18-1.37 %). Mean cumulative volume of intravenously injected iomeprol was 2339 mL (range: 540-3605 mL). Three patients (5.4 %) had developed severely decreased kidney function (estimated glomerular filtration rate between 15 and 29 mL/min per 1.73 m² for at least 3 months)., Conclusion: Patients with metastatic disease who experience a relatively long survival may be prone to undergo disproportionate recurrent CT imaging. The non-negligible CT radiation-induced cancer risk and mortality should be taken into account in these patients, while the effect of cumulatively administered CT contrast agents on kidney function requires further investigation., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declars no potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Importance: Prevention of postcontrast acute kidney injury in patients with stage 3 chronic kidney disease (CKD) by means of prehydration has been standard care for years. However, evidence for the need for prehydration in this group is limited., Objective: To assess the renal safety of omitting prophylactic prehydration prior to iodine-based contrast media administration in patients with stage 3 CKD., Design, Setting, and Participants: The Kompas trial was a multicenter, noninferiority, randomized clinical trial conducted at 6 hospitals in the Netherlands in which 523 patients with stage 3 CKD were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive no prehydration or prehydration with 250 mL of 1.4% sodium bicarbonate administered in a 1-hour infusion before undergoing elective contrast-enhanced computed tomography from April 2013 through September 2016. Final follow-up was completed in September 2017. Data were analyzed from January 2018 to June 2019., Interventions: In total, 262 patients were allocated to the no prehydration group and 261 were allocated to receive prehydration. Analysis on the primary end point was available in 505 patients (96.6%)., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the mean relative increase in serum creatinine level 2 to 5 days after contrast administration compared with baseline (noninferiority margin of less than 10% increase in serum creatinine level). Secondary outcomes included the incidence of postcontrast acute kidney injury 2 to 5 days after contrast administration, mean relative increase in creatinine level 7 to 14 days after contrast administration, incidences of acute heart failure and renal failure requiring dialysis, and health care costs., Results: Of 554 patients randomized, 523 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The median (interquartile range) age was 74 (67-79) years; 336 (64.2%) were men and 187 (35.8%) were women. The mean (SD) relative increase in creatinine level 2 to 5 days after contrast administration compared with baseline was 3.0% (10.5) in the no prehydration group vs 3.5% (10.3) in the prehydration group (mean difference, 0.5; 95% CI, -1.3 to 2.3; P < .001 for noninferiority). Postcontrast acute kidney injury occurred in 11 patients (2.1%), including 7 of 262 (2.7%) in the no prehydration group and 4 of 261 (1.5%) in the prehydration group, which resulted in a relative risk of 1.7 (95% CI, 0.5-5.9; P = .36). None of the patients required dialysis or developed acute heart failure. Subgroup analyses showed no evidence of statistical interactions between treatment arms and predefined subgroups. Mean hydration costs were €119 (US $143.94) per patient in the prehydration group compared with €0 (US $0) in the no prehydration group (P < .001). Other health care costs were similar., Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with stage 3 CKD undergoing contrast-enhanced computed tomography, withholding prehydration did not compromise patient safety. The findings of this study support the option of not giving prehydration as a safe and cost-efficient measure., Trial Registration: Netherlands Trial Register Identifier: NTR3764.