Search

To investigate the incidence of complications from lumbar decompression ± discectomy surgery for cauda equina syndrome (CES), assessing whether time of day is associated with a change in the incidence of complications.Electronic clinical and operative notes for all lumbar decompression operations undertaken at our institution for CES over a 2-year time period were retrospectively reviewed. "Overnight" surgery was defined as any surgery occurring between 18:00 and 08:00 on any day. Clinicopathological characteristics, surgical technique, and peri/post-operative complications were recorded. Multivariable logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals.A total of 81 lumbar decompression operations were performed in the 2-year period and analysed. A total of 29 (36%) operations occurred overnight. Complete CES (CESR) was seen in 13 cases (16%) in total, 7 of whom underwent surgery during the day. Exactly 27 complications occurred in 24 (30%) patients. The most frequently occurring complication was a dural tear (n = 21, 26%), followed by post-operative haematoma, infection, and residual disc. Complication rates in the CESR cohort (54%) were significantly greater than in the CES incomplete (CESI) cohort (25%) (p = 0.04). On multivariable analysis, overnight surgery was independently associated with a significantly increased complication rate (OR 2.83, CI 1.02-7.89).Lumbar decompressions performed overnight for CES were more than twice as likely to suffer a complication, in comparison to those performed within daytime hours. Our study suggests that out-of-hours operating, particularly at night, must be clinically justified and should not be influenced by day-time operating capacity.

Objective Cystic vestibular schwannomas (VS) in contrast to solid VS tend to have accelerated growth, larger volume, rapid/atypical presentation, lobulated/adherent surface, and unpredictable course of the cranial nerves. Cystic VS are surgically challenging, with worse clinical outcomes and higher rate of subtotal resection (STR). Methods We retrospectively analyzed postoperative outcomes of 125 patients with cystic VS, operated between years 2005 and 2019 in our center. We confronted the extent of the resection and House-Brackmann (HB) grade of facial palsy with the results of comparable cohort of patients with solid VS operated in our center and literature review by Thakur et al.1 Results Translabyrinthine approach was preferred for resection of large, cystic VS (97.6%). Gross-total resection (GTR) was achieved in 78 patients (62.4%), near-total resection (NTR) with remnant (5 cm3, retrosigmoid approach, high-riding jugular bulb, tumor adherence to the brain stem, and facial nerve (p = 0.016; 0.003; 0.005; 0.025; 0.001; and One year after the surgery, 76% of patients had HB grades 1 to 2, 16% had HB grades 3 to 4, and 8% had HB grades 5 to 6 palsy. Worse outcome (HB grades 3 to 6) was associated with preoperative facial palsy, tumor volume >25 cm3, and cyst over the brain stem (p = 0.045; 0.014; and 0.05, respectively). Comparable solid VS operated in our center had significantly higher HB grades 1 to 2 rate than our cystic VS (94% versus 76%; p = 0.03). Comparing our results with literature review, our HB grades 1 to 2 rate was significantly higher (76% versus 39%; p = 0.0001). Tumor control rate 5 years after surgery was 95.8%. Conclusion Our study confirmed that microsurgery of cystic VS has worse outcomes of facial nerve preservation and extent of resection compared with solid VS. Greater attention should be paid to the above-mentioned risk factors.

Depending on severity of presentation, pituitary apoplexy can be managed with acute surgery or non-operatively. We aim to assess long-term tumour control, visual and endocrinological outcomes following pituitary apoplexy with special emphasis on patients treated non-operatively.Multicentre retrospective cohort study. All patients with symptomatic pituitary apoplexy were included. Patients were divided into 3 groups: group 1: surgery within 7 days; group 2: surgery 7 days-3 months; group 3: non-operative. Further intervention for oncological reasons during follow-up was the primary outcome. Secondary outcome measures included visual and endocrinological function at last follow-up.One hundred sixty patients were identified with mean follow-up of 48 months (n = 61 group 1; n = 34 group 2; n = 64 group 3). Factors influencing decision for surgical treatment included visual acuity loss (OR: 2.50; 95% CI: 1.02-6.10), oculomotor nerve palsy (OR: 2.80; 95% CI: 1.08-7.25) and compression of chiasm on imaging (OR: 9.50; 95% CI: 2.06-43.73). Treatment for tumour progression/recurrence was required in 17%, 37% and 24% in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively (p = 0.07). Urgent surgery (OR: 0.16; 95% CI: 0.04-0.59) and tumour regression on follow-up (OR: 0.04; 95% CI: 0.04-0.36) were independently associated with long-term tumour control. Visual and endocrinological outcomes were comparable between groups.Urgent surgery is an independent predictor of long-term tumour control following pituitary apoplexy. However, 76% of patients who successfully complete 3 months of non-operative treatment may not require any intervention in the long term.

Summary Background The optimal invasive treatment for sciatica secondary to herniated lumbar disc remains controversial, with a paucity of evidence for use of non-surgical treatments such as transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) over surgical microdiscectomy. We aimed to investigate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of these options for management of radicular pain secondary to herniated lumbar disc. Methods We did a pragmatic, multicentre, phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial at 11 spinal units across the UK. Eligible patients were aged 16–65 years, had MRI-confirmed non-emergency sciatica secondary to herniated lumbar disc with symptom duration between 6 weeks and 12 months, and had leg pain that was not responsive to non-invasive management. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either TFESI or surgical microdiscectomy by an online randomisation system that was stratified by centre with random permuted blocks. The primary outcome was Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ) score at 18 weeks. All randomly assigned participants who completed a valid ODQ at baseline and at 18 weeks were included in the analysis. Safety analysis included all treated participants. Cost-effectiveness was estimated from the EuroQol-5D-5L, Hospital Episode Statistics, medication usage, and self-reported resource-use data. This trial was registered with ISRCTN, number ISRCTN04820368, and EudraCT, number 2014-002751-25. Findings Between March 6, 2015, and Dec 21, 2017, 163 (15%) of 1055 screened patients were enrolled, with 80 participants (49%) randomly assigned to the TFESI group and 83 participants (51%) to the surgery group. At week 18, ODQ scores were 30·02 (SD 24·38) for 63 assessed patients in the TFESI group and 22·30 (19·83) for 61 assessed patients in the surgery group. Mean improvement was 24·52 points (18·89) for the TFESI group and 26·74 points (21·35) for the surgery group, with an estimated treatment difference of −4·25 (95% CI −11·09 to 2·59; p=0·22). There were four serious adverse events in four participants associated with surgery, and none with TFESI. Compared with TFESI, surgery had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £38 737 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, and a 0·17 probability of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20 000 per quality-adjusted life-year. Interpretation For patients with sciatica secondary to herniated lumbar disc, with symptom duration of up to 12 months, TFESI should be considered as a first invasive treatment option. Surgery is unlikely to be a cost-effective alternative to TFESI. Funding Health Technology Assessment programme of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), UK.

Sciatica is a common condition reported to affect 3% of the UK population at any time and is most often caused by a prolapsed intervertebral disc. Currently, there is no uniformly adopted treatment strategy. Invasive treatments, such as surgery (i.e. microdiscectomy) and transforaminal epidural steroid injection, are often reserved for failed conservative treatment.To compare the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of microdiscectomy with transforaminal epidural steroid injection for the management of radicular pain secondary to lumbar prolapsed intervertebral disc for non-emergency presentation of sciatica of 12 months' duration.Patients were randomised to either (1) microdiscectomy or (2) transforaminal epidural steroid injection.A pragmatic, multicentre, randomised prospective trial comparing microdiscectomy with transforaminal epidural steroid injection for sciatica due to prolapsed intervertebral disc with 1 year symptom duration.NHS services providing secondary spinal surgical care within the UK.A total of 163 participants (aged 16-65 years) were recruited from 11 UK NHS outpatient clinics.The primary outcome was participant-completed Oswestry Disability Questionnaire score at 18 weeks post randomisation. Secondary outcomes were visual analogue scores for leg pain and back pain; modified Roland-Morris score (for sciatica), Core Outcome Measures Index score and participant satisfaction at 12-weekly intervals. Cost-effectiveness and quality of life were assessed using the EuroQol-5 Dimensions, five-level version; Hospital Episode Statistics data; medication usage; and self-reported cost data at 12-weekly intervals. Adverse event data were collected. The economic outcome was incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained from the perspective of the NHS in England.Eighty-three participants were allocated to transforaminal epidural steroid injection and 80 participants were allocated to microdiscectomy, using an online randomisation system. At week 18, Oswestry Disability Questionnaire scores had decreased, relative to baseline, by 26.7 points in the microdiscectomy group and by 24.5 points in the transforaminal epidural steroid injection. The difference between the treatments was not statistically significant (estimated treatment effect -4.25 points, 95% confidence interval -11.09 to 2.59 points). Nor were there significant differences between treatments in any of the secondary outcomes: Oswestry Disability Questionnaire scores, visual analogue scores for leg pain and back pain, modified Roland-Morris score and Core Outcome Measures Index score up to 54 weeks. There were four (3.8%) serious adverse events in the microdiscectomy group, including one nerve palsy (foot drop), and none in the transforaminal epidural steroid injection group. Compared with transforaminal epidural steroid injection, microdiscectomy had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £38,737 per quality-adjusted life-year gained and a probability of 0.17 of being cost-effective at a willingness to pay threshold of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year.Primary outcome data was invalid or incomplete for 24% of participants. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated robustness to assumptions made regarding missing data. Eighteen per cent of participants in the transforaminal epidural steroid injection group subsequently received microdiscectomy prior to their primary outcome assessment.To the best of our knowledge, the NErve Root Block VErsus Surgery trial is the first trial to evaluate the comparative clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of microdiscectomy and transforaminal epidural steroid injection. No statistically significant difference was found between the two treatments for the primary outcome. It is unlikely that microdiscectomy is cost-effective compared with transforaminal epidural steroid injection at a threshold of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year for sciatica secondary to prolapsed intervertebral disc.These results will lead to further studies in the streamlining and earlier management of discogenic sciatica.Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN04820368 and EudraCT 2014-002751-25.This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full inSciatica or pain related to nerve irritation travelling down the leg is common in young working adults and most likely to be caused by a ‘slipped’ (prolapsed) disc. Although the majority of cases get better on their own and within 4–6 weeks, a significant group of patients struggle with disabling symptoms sometimes beyond 1 year. Consequently, patients struggle to maintain their home and working lives. Many treatments are available for sciatica, but simpler treatments (e.g. pain tablets, physiotherapy and changing one’s lifestyle) are often not very effective and patients have often tried all of them by the time they are seen in hospital to have tests, such as scans, done. Surgery to remove part of the disc is recommended in cases where the pain is accompanied by severe weakness in one or both legs, or where doctors think that nerves may be damaged because patients have bladder, bowel and sexual functioning difficulties (i.e. red flag symptoms). Surgery works well in alleviation of referred leg pain and also to relieve pressure on a physically compressed nerve that may be showing clinical sign of injury/weakness. An alternative to surgery is to inject a mixture of anaesthetic and steroid close to the site of the disc injury and nerve, but at the moment we do not know whether or not these injections work in the long term. They are cheaper and less invasive, with fewer risks than surgery, such as from anaesthetic or infection.This study compared the usefulness of surgery with injections for patients who have had sciatica for 1 year and who have tried simple remedies but are still in pain. Patients were allocated to have either surgery or the injection. Symptoms (e.g. pain) were assessed after 18 weeks.We found that there was no significant difference between surgery and injection at the primary end point. Surgery was not significantly different from injection in terms of clinical outcome and was not cost-effective compared with injection.Given the cost of surgery and the risks to patients, we suggest that further studies should be carried out to explore whether or not all patients with sciatica due to a slipped disc should be considered suitable for an injection, unless there is a good reason not to.

Background CRANIAL (CSF Rhinorrhoea After Endonasal Intervention to the Skull Base) is a prospective multicenter observational study seeking to determine 1) the scope of skull base repair methods used and 2) corresponding rates of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea in the endonasal transsphenoidal approach (TSA) and the expanded endonasal approach (EEA) for skull base tumors. We sought to pilot the project, assessing the feasibility and acceptability by gathering preliminary data. Methods A prospective observational cohort study was piloted at 12 tertiary neurosurgical units in the United Kingdom. Feedback regarding project positives and challenges were qualitatively analyzed. Results A total of 187 cases were included: 159 TSA (85%) and 28 EEA (15%). The most common diseases included pituitary adenomas (n = 142/187), craniopharyngiomas (n = 13/187). and skull base meningiomas (n = 4/187). The most common skull base repair techniques used were tissue glues (n = 132/187, most commonly Tisseel), grafts (n = 94/187, most commonly fat autograft or Spongostan) and vascularized flaps (n = 51/187, most commonly nasoseptal). These repairs were most frequently supported by nasal packs (n = 125/187) and lumbar drains (n = 20/187). Biochemically confirmed CSF rhinorrhea occurred in 6/159 patients undergoing TSA (3.8%) and 2/28 patients undergoing EEA (7.1%). Four patients undergoing TSA (2.5%) and 2 patients undergoing EEA (7.1%) required operative management for CSF rhinorrhea (CSF diversion or direct repair). Qualitative feedback was largely positive (themes included user-friendly and efficient data collection and strong support from senior team members), demonstrating acceptability. Conclusions Our pilot experience highlights the acceptability and feasibility of CRANIAL. There is a precedent for multicenter dissemination of this project, to establish a benchmark of contemporary practice in skull base neurosurgery, particularly with respect to patients undergoing EEA.

Background: The endonasal transsphenoidal approach (TSA) has emerged as the preferred approach in order to treat pituitary adenoma and related sellar pathologies. The recently adopted expanded endonasal approach (EEA) has improved access to the ventral skull base whilst retaining the principles of minimally invasive surgery. Despite the advantages these approaches offer, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhoea remains a common complication. There is currently a lack of comparative evidence to guide the best choice of skull base reconstruction, resulting in considerable heterogeneity of current practice. This study aims to determine: (1) the scope of the methods of skull base repair; and (2) the corresponding rates of postoperative CSF rhinorrhoea in contemporary neurosurgical practice in the UK and Ireland. Methods: We will adopt a multicentre, prospective, observational cohort design. All neurosurgical units in the UK and Ireland performing the relevant surgeries (TSA and EEA) will be eligible to participate. Eligible cases will be prospectively recruited over 6 months with 6 months of postoperative follow-up. Data points collected will include: demographics, tumour characteristics, operative data), and postoperative outcomes. Primary outcomes include skull base repair technique and CSF rhinorrhoea (biochemically confirmed and/or requiring intervention) rates. Pooled data will be analysed using descriptive statistics. All skull base repair methods used and CSF leak rates for TSA and EEA will be compared against rates listed in the literature. Ethics and dissemination: Formal institutional ethical board review was not required owing to the nature of the study–this was confirmed with the Health Research Authority, UK. Conclusions: The need for this multicentre, prospective, observational study is highlighted by the relative paucity of literature and the resultant lack of consensus on the topic. It is hoped that the results will give insight into contemporary practice in the UK and Ireland and will inform future studies.

Assessing shunt function in vivo presents a diagnostic challenge. Infusion studies can be a cost-effective and minimally invasive aid in the assessment of shunt function in vivo. We describe a case of a patient who after a foramen magnum decompression for type I Chiari malformation developed bilateral posterior fossa subdural hygromas and mild hydrocephalus, eventually necessitating insertion of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt. The patient returned with symptoms that were concerning for infection of the shunt. A bedside infusion study helped confirm that the ventricular catheter was partially obstructed by in-growing choroid plexus, but also that the shunt was no longer necessary. Partial blockage due to in-growing choroid plexus was confirmed during surgery to remove the shunt. We discuss the behaviour of in-growing choroid plexus and how partial obstruction can be detected with the use of an infusion study, as well as how this compares to the pattern observed in complete shunt obstruction. The benefits of using infusion studies in the assessment of shunt function are also explored.

OBJECTIVEThe object of this study was to determine if revision transsphenoidal surgery (TSS), guided by 11C-methionine PET/CT coregistered with volumetric MRI (Met-PET/MRCR), can lead to remission in patients with persistent acromegaly due to a postoperative lateral disease remnant.METHODSThe authors identified 9 patients with persistent acromegaly following primary intervention (TSS ± medical therapy ± radiotherapy) in whom further surgery had initially been discounted because of equivocal MRI findings with suspected lateral sellar and/or parasellar disease (cases with clear Knosp grade 4 disease were excluded). All patients underwent Met-PET/MRCR. Scan findings were used by the pituitary multidisciplinary team to inform decision-making regarding repeat surgery. Revision TSS was performed with wide lateral exploration as guided by the PET findings. Endocrine reassessment was performed at 6–10 weeks after surgery, with longitudinal follow-up thereafter.RESULTSMet-PET/MRCR revealed focal tracer uptake in the lateral sellar and/or parasellar region(s) in all 9 patients, which correlated with sites of suspected residual tumor on volumetric MRI. At surgery, tumor was identified and resected in 5 patients, although histological analysis confirmed somatotroph tumor in only 4 cases. In the other 4 patients, no definite tumor was seen, but equivocal tissue was removed. Despite the uncertainty at surgery, all patients showed immediate significant improvements in clinical and biochemical parameters. In the 8 patients for whom long-term follow-up data were available, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) was ≤ 1.2 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) in all subjects and ≤ 1 times the ULN in 6 subjects, and these findings have been maintained for up to 28 months (median 8 months, mean 13 months) with no requirement for adjunctive medical therapy or radiotherapy. No patient suffered any additional pituitary deficit or other complication of surgery.CONCLUSIONSThis study provides proof of concept that Met-PET/MRCR can be helpful in the evaluation of residual lateral sellar/parasellar disease in persistent acromegaly and facilitate targeted revision TSS in a subgroup of patients.

Background Endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) is increasingly used for olfactory groove meningiomas (OGMs). The role of EES for large (≥4 cm) or complex OGMs is debated. Specific imaging features have been reported to affect the degree of gross total resection (GTR) and complications following EES for OGMs. The influence of these factors on transcranial resection (TCR) is unknown. Objective To examine the impact of specific imaging features on outcome following TCR to provide a standard for large and endoscopically less favorable OGMs against which endoscopic outcomes can be compared. Methods Retrospective study of patients undergoing TCR for OGMs 2002 to 2016. Results Fifty patients (mean age 62.1 yr, mean maximum tumor diameter 5.04 cm and average tumor volume of 48.8 cm3) were studied. Simpson grade 1 and 2 resections were achieved in 80% and 12%, respectively. A favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-2) was attained in 86%. The degree of resection, mRS, mortality (4%), recurrence (6%), infection (8%), and cerebrospinal fluid leak requiring intervention (12%) were not associated with tumor calcification, absence of cortical cuff, T2 hyperintensity, tumor configuration, tumor extension beyond midpoint of superior orbital roof, or extension to posterior wall of frontal sinus. There was no difference in resection rates but a trend towards greater complications between 3 arbitrarily divided groups of large meningiomas of increasing complexity based on extensive extension or vascular adherence. Conclusion Favorable outcomes can be achieved with TCR for large and complex OGMs Factors that may preclude endoscopic resection do not negatively affect outcome following TCR.

Navigation is emerging as a useful adjunct in percutaneous, minimally invasive spinal surgery (MIS). The aim of this study was to compare C-Arm navigated, O-Arm navigated and conventional 2D-fluoroscopy assisted MIS thoracic and lumbosacral spine fixation techniques in terms of operating time, radiation exposure and accuracy of pedicle screw (PS) placement. Retrospective observational study of 152 consecutive adults who underwent MIS fixations for spinal instability: 96 2D-fluoroscopy assisted, 39 3D-C-Arm navigated and 27 using O-Arm navigated. O-Arm navigation significantly reduced PS misplacement (1.23%, p) compared to 3D-C-Arm navigation (7.29%, p = 0.0082) and 2D-fluoro guided placement (5.16%, p = 0379). 3D-C-Arm navigation was associated with lower procedural radiation exposure of the patient (0.4 mSv) than O-Arm navigation (3.24 mSv) or 2D-fluoro guidance (1.5 mSv). Operative time was comparable between three modalities. O-Arm navigation provides greater accuracy of percutaneous instrumentation placement with an acceptable procedural radiation dose delivered to the patients and comparable operative times. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary material.

Objectives A decision on whether to insert a cochlear implant can be made in neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2) if there is objective evidence of cochlear nerve (CN) function post vestibular schwannoma (VS) excision. We aimed to develop intraoperative CN monitoring to help in this decision. Design We describe the intraoperative monitoring of a patient with NF2 and our stimulating and recording set up. A novel test electrode is used to stimulate the CN electrically. Setting This study was set at a tertiary referral center for skull base pathology. Main outcome measure Preserved auditory brainstem responses leading to cochlear implantation. Results Electrical auditory brainstem response (EABR) waveforms will be displayed from different stages of the operation. A cochlear implant was inserted at the same sitting based on the EABR. Conclusion Electrically evoked CN monitoring can provide objective evidence of CN function after VS excision and aid in the decision-making process of hearing rehabilitation in patients who will be rendered deaf.

Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) is an autosomal dominant condition resulting in multiple benign intracranial and spinal tumours including bilateral vestibular schwannomas. The management of vestibular schwannomas in NF2 is particularly challenging, given the young presentation of many patients, the natural history of the disease that often leads to complete loss of hearing in both ears and the burden of other tumours. Specialists from multidisciplinary NF2 teams describe current concepts in the management of vestibular schwannomas in NF2.

Thoracic disc prolapses causing cord compression can be challenging. For compressive central disc protrusions, a posterior approach is not suitable due to an unacceptable level of cord manipulation. An anterolateral transthoracic approach provides direct access to the disc prolapse allowing for decompression without disturbing the spinal cord. In this video, we describe 2 cases of thoracic myelopathy from a compressive central thoracic disc prolapse. In both cases, informed consent was obtained. Despite similar radiological appearances of heavy calcification, intraoperatively significant differences can be encountered. We demonstrate different surgical strategies depending on the consistency of the disc and the adherence to the thecal sac. With adequate exposure and detachment from adjacent vertebral bodies, soft discs can be, in most instances, separated from the theca with minimal cord manipulation. On the other hand, largely calcified discs often present a significantly greater challenge and require thinning the disc capsule before removal. In cases with significant adherence to dura, in order to prevent cord injury or cerebrospinal fluid leak a thinned shell can be left, providing total detachment from adjacent vertebrae can be achieved. Postoperatively, the first patient, with a significantly calcified disc, developed a transient left leg weakness which recovered by 3-month follow-up. This video outlines the anatomical considerations and operative steps for a transthoracic approach to a central disc prolapse, whilst demonstrating that computed tomography appearances are not always indicative of potential operative difficulties.

Minimally invasive lumbar fusion is well described and is reported to offer significant advantages to patients in terms of blood loss, a reduction in post-operative pain and a quicker recovery. However, this technique may expose patients to a greater risk of complications when compared to open lumbar instrumented fusion that may negate these advantages. Between January 2007 and March 2001, we conducted a prospective observational study of 100 consecutive patients (48 males and 52 females, mean age of 54 years) to investigate complications occurring from minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion surgery using an image-guided technique. All patients underwent post-operative CT scans to assess implant placement. Scanning was repeated at 6 months to assess bony fusion. We observed the following complications: 2.5% (11/435) pedicle screw misplacement, 1.7% (2/120) interbody cage misplacement; 0.8% (1/120) interbody cage migration; 0.8% (1/120) patients requiring a post-operative blood transfusion; 2% (2/100) venous thrombo-embolism and 3% (3/100) patients with complications thought to be related to the use of bone morphogenic protein. There were no occurrences of infection and no cerebrospinal fluid leaks. We concluded that the rate of complications from minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion is low, and compares favourably with the rates of complication from open procedures. Moreover, computerised navigation systems can be used in place of real-time fluoroscopy to guide implant placement, without an increase in the rate of complications.

Objectives To report our approach to the surgical management of vestibular schwannomas (VSs) and hearing rehabilitation in neurofibromatosis Type 2 (NF2). Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Tertiary referral NF2 unit. Patients Between 1981 and 2011, seventy-five patients were managed in our NF2 unit, of which, 58 patients are under current review. Main outcome measures Patients who underwent VS excision were evaluated for tumor size, surgical approach, and outcomes of hearing and facial nerve function. All current patients were evaluated for NF2 mutation, hearing, and auditory implantation outcomes. Results Forty-four patients underwent resection of 50 VS in our unit, of which, 14% had facial neuroma excision and reinnervation during the same operation. At 12 months after surgery, facial nerve outcomes were House-Brackmann (HB) 1 in 33%, HB2 in 21%, and HB3 in 30%. Total VS resection was achieved in 78% of patients using a translabyrinthine approach. Seventy-two percent of the current patients have American Association of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery class A to C hearing (maximum speech discrimination score over 50%) in the better hearing ear, and a further 14% are full-time users of cochlear implants or auditory brainstem implants. The remaining patients have been assessed for auditory implantation. Conclusion By following a policy of treating VS in NF2 patients where tumor growth is observed, complete tumor resection can be achieved through a translabyrinthine approach while achieving comparable facial nerve outcomes to published series. We advocate proactive hearing rehabilitation in all patients with timely assessment for auditory implantation to maintain quality of life.

Background Using bone morphogenic protein (BMP) to augment fusion in spine surgery is widespread and lends itself in particular to minimally invasive lumbar fusion, where the surface area for fusion is significantly less than the equivalent open procedure. Purpose Here we described the use of very low–dose BMP in promoting fusion in minimally invasive lumbar interbody fixation but also highlight some of the potential complications of BMP-2 use and techniques available to reduce or avoid them. Study design Prospective observational study of consecutive patients undergoing minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screws. Patient sample Thirty patients aged between 22 and 78 years (mean 53 years). Outcome measures Thin-slice lumbar computed tomography scanning with multiplanar reconstruction at 6 and 12 months postoperative. Methods Thirty-six spinal levels were instrumented in total, of which four underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion and 32 underwent transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Bone graft harvested locally was placed in the disc space with low-dose BMP-2 (1.4 mg per level). Results Thirty-three of 36 spinal levels showed complete fusion at a mean postoperative scan time of 7.1 months. Two levels demonstrated partial fusion at 6 months, which was complete at 12 months. There was one case of nonunion at 12 months, which also demonstrated vertebral body osteolysis. Despite very low–dose BMP-2, two cases of asymptomatic heterotopic ossification were observed, and there were two cases of perineural cyst formation, one of whom required revision of the interbody cage. Conclusions The use of BMP with autograft in the disc space during minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion is associated with a high rate of early fusion. Even with very low–dose BMP used in this study, complications related to BMP usage were not avoided completely.

The past two decades have witnessed the emergence of minimally invasive techniques in most surgical specialties, but their role in spinal surgery remains controversial. A recent study has compared outcomes in minimally invasive versus open spinal fusion surgery. Does the size of the surgical approach really matter?

Objective: To review the treatment of squamous carcinoma of the temporal bone at a regional skull base unit for the period 1982Y2012. Study Design: Retrospective case review. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Patients: Sixty patients with primary squamous carcinoma of the temporal bone. Interventions: Multidisciplinary team approach including surgical resection, reconstruction, and postoperative radiotherapy. Main Outcome Measures: Disease-specific survival, overall survival. Results: The 5-year disease-specific survival for the whole cohort was 44% (CI, 37%Y51%). Multivariable analysis revealed nodal status, poorly differentiated squamous cell histology, and carotid involvement to be poor prognostic indicators. Conclusion: Although the survival figures in this series are comparable with the best outcomes from other units, our experience would suggest improvements can still be achieved by reconsidering the selection of patients for neck dissection and temperomandibular joint excision in early stage disease. We also conclude that postoperative radiotherapy should be delivered to all patients, including surgical salvage cases who may have received previous irradiation. Finally, the minority of patients with poor prognostic features should be offered a more palliative therapeutic approach. Key Words: Radical surgeryVRadiotherapyVSquamous cell carcinomaVTemporal bone. Otol Neurotol 00:00Y00, 2014. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) affecting the temporal bone region is an aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis. The reported incidence is less than 6 cases per million per year, which accounts for 0.3% of all cancers within the head and neck, with a reported 5-year diseasespecific survival ranging from 19% to 48% (1Y3). Risk factors for SCC within the epithelium of the temporal bone are previous radiotherapy treatment and chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) (4,5). Exposure to ul

Background context Postoperative back pain is common after decompression surgery for lumbar stenosis and often delays discharge from hospital. Achieving regional analgesia by intraoperative delivery of epidural opiates after lumbar canal decompression is a promising approach to reduce postoperative pain and enhance early mobilization. However, there have been concerns about opiate-related complications, such as respiratory depression and urinary retention in what is generally an elderly population of patients. Purpose To assess the analgesic efficacy of bolus epidural fentanyl administered intraoperatively after lumbar decompression for degenerative canal stenosis. Study design/setting Patient-blinded randomized controlled trial conducted at two university neurosurgical centers. Patient sample Adults (older than 18 years) with neurogenic claudication and/or lower limb radiculopathy and concordant lumbar spinal canal stenosis demonstrated on magnetic resonance imaging. Patients with previous lumbar spinal surgery, a contraindication to fentanyl, or requiring instrumentation were excluded. Outcome measures The primary outcome measure was patient-reported Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for pain recorded preoperatively, in recovery, and on the first and second postoperative days if the patient remained in the hospital. Secondary outcomes were duration of surgery, length of stay, and any side effects or complications. Methods Patients underwent a one to three level lumbar canal decompression as required, via a midline incision, under general anesthesia. Before wound closure either no drug (control) or a 100-μg bolus of fentanyl was administered via an epidural catheter inserted 10 cm rostral to the operated level. Patients were blinded to group allocation, and analysis was by intention to treat. The trial was approved by the National Health Service Research Ethics Service and the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. No commercial or other source of funding was received. Results Sixty patients were randomized, 29 to fentanyl and 31 to control. Demographics, duration of surgery, and preoperative VAS were not significantly different between the groups. VAS in recovery was significantly lower in patients treated with fentanyl (mean [standard deviation]: 2.6 [2.7] vs. 4.7 [2.4]; p=.003). Later VAS and postoperative length of stay were similar between groups. More patients in the fentanyl group required temporary urinary catheterization, but there was no significant difference in the incidence of side effects. Conclusions Bolus epidural fentanyl provides effective short-term postoperative analgesia after lumbar canal decompression and may be a useful adjunct to pain management in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.

Study Design A comparison of 2 surgical techniques. Objective To determine the relative accuracy of minimally invasive lumbar pedicle screw placement using 2 different CT-based image-guided techniques. Summary of Background Three-dimensional intraoperative fluoroscopy systems have recently become available that provide the ability to use CT-quality images for navigation during image-guided minimally invasive spinal surgery. However, the cost of this equipment may negate any potential benefit in navigational accuracy. We therefore assess the accuracy of pedicle screw placement using an intraoperative 3-dimensional fluoroscope for guidance compared with a technique using preoperative CT images merged to intraoperative 2-dimensional fluoroscopy. Methods Sixty-seven patients undergoing minimally invasive placement of lumbar pedicle screws (296 screws) using a navigated, image-guided technique were studied and the accuracy of pedicle screw placement assessed. Electromyography (EMG) monitoring of lumbar nerve roots was used in all. Group 1: 24 patients in whom a preoperative CT scan was merged with intraoperative 2-dimensional fluoroscopy images on the image-guidance system. Group 2: 43 patients using intraoperative 3-dimensional fluoroscopy images as the source for the image guidance system. The frequencies of pedicle breach and EMG warnings (indicating potentially unsafe screw placement) in each group were recorded. Results The rate of pedicle screw misplacement was 6.4% in group 1vs 1.6% in group 2 (P=0.03). There were no cases of neurologic injury from suboptimal placement of screws. Additionally, the incidence of EMG warnings was significantly lower in group 2 (3.7% vs. 10% (P=0.03). Conclusions The use of an intraoperative 3-dimensional fluoroscopy system with an image-guidance system results in greater accuracy of pedicle screw placement than the use of preoperative CT scans, although potentially dangerous placement of pedicle screws can be prevented by the use of EMG monitoring of lumbar nerve roots.

Object The authors assessed the accuracy of placement of lumbar transpedicular screws by using a computer-assisted, imaged-guided, minimally invasive technique with continuous electromyography (EMG) monitoring. Methods This was a consecutive case series with prospective assessment of procedural accuracy. Forty-seven consecutive patients underwent minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion and placement of pedicle screws (PSs). A computer-assisted image guidance system involving CT-based images was used to guide screw placement, while EMG continuously monitored the lumbar nerve roots at the operated levels with a 5-mA stimulus applied through the pedicle access needle. All patients underwent CT scanning to determine accuracy of PS placement. All episodes of adjusted screw trajectory based on positive EMG responses were recorded. Pedicle screw misplacement was defined as breach of the pedicle cortex by the screw of more than 2 mm. Results Two hundred twelve PSs were inserted in 47 patients. The screw misplacement rate was 4.7%. One patient experienced new postoperative radiculopathy resulting from a sacral screw that was too long, with lumbosacral trunk impingement. The trajectory of the pedicle access needle was altered intraoperatively on 20 occasions (9.4% of the PSs) based on positive EMG responses, suggesting that nerve root impingement may have resulted from these screws had the EMG monitoring not been used. Conclusions The combination of computer-assisted navigation combined with continuous EMG monitoring during pedicle cannulation results in a low rate of PS misplacement, with avoidance of screw positions that might cause neural injury. Furthermore, this technique allows reduction of the radiation exposure for the surgical team without compromising the accuracy of screw placement.

Background Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) is widely used to promote fusion in spinal surgery, but its safety has been questioned. Purpose To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rhBMP-2. Data sources Individual-participant data obtained from the sponsor or investigators and data extracted from study publications identified by systematic bibliographic searches through June 2012. Study selection Randomized, controlled trials of rhBMP-2 versus iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) in spinal fusion surgery for degenerative disc disease and related conditions and observational studies in similar populations for investigation of adverse events. Data extraction Individual-participant data from 11 eligible of 17 provided trials sponsored by Medtronic (Minneapolis, Minnesota) (n = 1302) and 1 of 2 other eligible trials (n = 106) were included. Additional aggregate adverse event data were extracted from 35 published observational studies. Data synthesis Primary outcomes were pain (assessed with the Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] or Short Form-36), fusion, and adverse events. At 24 months, ODI scores were 3.5% lower (better) with rhBMP-2 than with ICBG (95% CI, 0.5% to 6.5%) and radiographic fusion was 12% higher (CI, 2% to 23%). At or shortly after surgery, pain was more common with rhBMP-2 (odds ratio, 1.78 [CI, 1.06 to 2.95]). Cancer was more common after rhBMP-2 (relative risk, 1.98 [CI, 0.86 to 4.54]), but the small number of events precluded definite conclusions. Limitation The observational studies were diverse and at risk of bias. Conclusion At 24 months, rhBMP-2 increases fusion rates, reduces pain by a clinically insignificant amount, and increases early postsurgical pain compared with ICBG. Evidence of increased cancer incidence is inconclusive. Primary funding source Yale University Open Data Access Project.