Back to Search
Start Over
CSF rhinorrhoea after endonasal intervention to the skull base (CRANIAL) - Part 1: multicentre pilot study
- Source :
- CRANIAL Consortium 2021, ' CSF Rhinorrhoea After Endonasal Intervention to the Skull Base (CRANIAL)-Part 1 : Multicenter Pilot Study ', World Neurosurgery . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.171
- Publication Year :
- 2020
- Publisher :
- Elsevier, 2020.
-
Abstract
- Background CRANIAL (CSF Rhinorrhoea After Endonasal Intervention to the Skull Base) is a prospective multicenter observational study seeking to determine 1) the scope of skull base repair methods used and 2) corresponding rates of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea in the endonasal transsphenoidal approach (TSA) and the expanded endonasal approach (EEA) for skull base tumors. We sought to pilot the project, assessing the feasibility and acceptability by gathering preliminary data. Methods A prospective observational cohort study was piloted at 12 tertiary neurosurgical units in the United Kingdom. Feedback regarding project positives and challenges were qualitatively analyzed. Results A total of 187 cases were included: 159 TSA (85%) and 28 EEA (15%). The most common diseases included pituitary adenomas (n = 142/187), craniopharyngiomas (n = 13/187). and skull base meningiomas (n = 4/187). The most common skull base repair techniques used were tissue glues (n = 132/187, most commonly Tisseel), grafts (n = 94/187, most commonly fat autograft or Spongostan) and vascularized flaps (n = 51/187, most commonly nasoseptal). These repairs were most frequently supported by nasal packs (n = 125/187) and lumbar drains (n = 20/187). Biochemically confirmed CSF rhinorrhea occurred in 6/159 patients undergoing TSA (3.8%) and 2/28 patients undergoing EEA (7.1%). Four patients undergoing TSA (2.5%) and 2 patients undergoing EEA (7.1%) required operative management for CSF rhinorrhea (CSF diversion or direct repair). Qualitative feedback was largely positive (themes included user-friendly and efficient data collection and strong support from senior team members), demonstrating acceptability. Conclusions Our pilot experience highlights the acceptability and feasibility of CRANIAL. There is a precedent for multicenter dissemination of this project, to establish a benchmark of contemporary practice in skull base neurosurgery, particularly with respect to patients undergoing EEA.
- Subjects :
- Male
Pilot Projects
Surgical Flaps
Craniopharyngioma
Postoperative Complications
0302 clinical medicine
Meningeal Neoplasms
CRANIAL Consortium
Prospective Studies
Child
EEA
Cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea
Aged, 80 and over
Skull Base
Cerebrospinal fluid leak
Cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhoea
Middle Aged
Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea
medicine.anatomical_structure
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
Female
Neurosurgery
Nasal Cavity
medicine.symptom
Meningioma
Cohort study
Adenoma
Adult
Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery
medicine.medical_specialty
Adolescent
Sphenoid Sinus
CSF
Fibrin Tissue Adhesive
Young Adult
03 medical and health sciences
Lumbar
medicine
Humans
Pituitary Neoplasms
Endoscopic endonasal
Aged
rhinorrhea
Wound Closure Techniques
business.industry
1103 Clinical Sciences
Fibrin Foam
medicine.disease
Surgery
Skull
Neuroendoscopy
Skull base surgery
Tissue Adhesives
Neurology (clinical)
business
1109 Neurosciences
030217 neurology & neurosurgery
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- CRANIAL Consortium 2021, ' CSF Rhinorrhoea After Endonasal Intervention to the Skull Base (CRANIAL)-Part 1 : Multicenter Pilot Study ', World Neurosurgery . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.171
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....76b82259ddcd40c76c44b0a95e25b5d3
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.171