Back to Search Start Over

CSF rhinorrhoea after endonasal intervention to the skull base (CRANIAL) - Part 1: multicentre pilot study

Authors :
Rafid Al-Mahfoudh
Sam Muquit
Simon Stapleton
Neil Donnelly
Syed Shumon
Alexandros Boukas
Duncan Henderson
Shahzada Ahmed
Ramesh Nair
Parag Sayal
Patrick McAleavey
Alex Paluzzi
Kismet Hossain-Ibrahim
Raj Bhalla
Andrew J. Martin
Hugo Layard Horsfall
Wai Cheong Soon
Mohamed Youssef
Mahmoud Kamel
Simon Cudlip
Sinan Al-Barazi
Patrick Statham
Rory J Piper
Simon Shaw
Ahmad M. S. Ali
Jonathan Shapey
Eleni Maratos
Andrew F. Alalade
Graham Dow
Omar N. Pathmanaban
Bhaskar Ram
Caroline Hayhurst
Brendan Hanna
Anastasios Giamouriadis
Angelos G. Kolias
Alireza Shoakazemi
Jane Halliday
Benjamin E. Schroeder
Mohammad Habibullah Khan
Annabel Chadwick
Nicholas Thomas
Callum M. Allison
Claire Nicholson
Catherine Gilkes
Mark Hughes
Pragnesh Bhatt
Shumail Mahmood
Kanna K. Gnanalingham
Georgios Solomou
James R. Tysome
Nigel Mendoza
Adithya Varma
Peter D. Lacy
Theodore Hirst
Danyal Z. Khan
Vikesh Patel
Paresh Naik
Benjamin Stew
Iain Robertson
Meriem Amarouche
Mohsen Javadpour
Daniel M Fountain
Neil Dorward
Christopher P. Millward
Rishi Sharma
Thomas Santarius
Anuj Bahl
Dimitris Paraskevopoulos
Alice O’Donnell
Soham Bandyopadhyay
Joan Grieve
Mohammad Saud Khan
Yasir A. Chowdhury
Showkat Mirza
Nijaguna Mathad
Daniel Murray
Elena Roman
Jonathan Pollock
P.E. Ross
Hani J. Marcus
Adam Williams
Georgios Tsermoulas
Jonathan Hempenstall
Alistair Jenkins
Richard Mannion
Ivan Cabrilo
David Bennett
Nick Phillips
Philip Weir
David Choi
Saurabh Sinha
Source :
CRANIAL Consortium 2021, ' CSF Rhinorrhoea After Endonasal Intervention to the Skull Base (CRANIAL)-Part 1 : Multicenter Pilot Study ', World Neurosurgery . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.171
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2020.

Abstract

Background CRANIAL (CSF Rhinorrhoea After Endonasal Intervention to the Skull Base) is a prospective multicenter observational study seeking to determine 1) the scope of skull base repair methods used and 2) corresponding rates of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea in the endonasal transsphenoidal approach (TSA) and the expanded endonasal approach (EEA) for skull base tumors. We sought to pilot the project, assessing the feasibility and acceptability by gathering preliminary data. Methods A prospective observational cohort study was piloted at 12 tertiary neurosurgical units in the United Kingdom. Feedback regarding project positives and challenges were qualitatively analyzed. Results A total of 187 cases were included: 159 TSA (85%) and 28 EEA (15%). The most common diseases included pituitary adenomas (n = 142/187), craniopharyngiomas (n = 13/187). and skull base meningiomas (n = 4/187). The most common skull base repair techniques used were tissue glues (n = 132/187, most commonly Tisseel), grafts (n = 94/187, most commonly fat autograft or Spongostan) and vascularized flaps (n = 51/187, most commonly nasoseptal). These repairs were most frequently supported by nasal packs (n = 125/187) and lumbar drains (n = 20/187). Biochemically confirmed CSF rhinorrhea occurred in 6/159 patients undergoing TSA (3.8%) and 2/28 patients undergoing EEA (7.1%). Four patients undergoing TSA (2.5%) and 2 patients undergoing EEA (7.1%) required operative management for CSF rhinorrhea (CSF diversion or direct repair). Qualitative feedback was largely positive (themes included user-friendly and efficient data collection and strong support from senior team members), demonstrating acceptability. Conclusions Our pilot experience highlights the acceptability and feasibility of CRANIAL. There is a precedent for multicenter dissemination of this project, to establish a benchmark of contemporary practice in skull base neurosurgery, particularly with respect to patients undergoing EEA.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
CRANIAL Consortium 2021, ' CSF Rhinorrhoea After Endonasal Intervention to the Skull Base (CRANIAL)-Part 1 : Multicenter Pilot Study ', World Neurosurgery . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.171
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....76b82259ddcd40c76c44b0a95e25b5d3
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.171