Search

To evaluate the incidence, treatment and postoperative outcomes of an acute hiatal hernia (HH) after totally minimally invasive esophagectomy (tMIE) for oesophageal cancer. The incidence and treatment of acute HH were analysed from our prospective database including all patients that were surgically treated for oesophageal cancer in the period between January 2011 and December 2018. Within the study period, the database contained 307 patients that underwent minimally invasive oesophagectomy. Patients’ characteristics were in line with the literature of Western data. The incidence of acute HH was 2.6% (N = 8). All patients presented with gastro-intestinal obstruction symptoms, that required acute operation, repositioning of the intrathoracic organs in combination with a crural repair. Mesh reinforcement was used in 38% (N = 3). In two patients, the intestines were partially resected due to ischemia. Postoperative complications, as atrial fibrillation, respiratory failure and anastomotic leakage, were seen in 63% (N = 5). Recurrence-rate was 38% (N = 3). This present study demonstrates that an acute HH after tMIE is a serious complication with an incidence of 2.6%. When symptomatic and acute, HH requires surgical intervention and has high postoperative morbidity and recurrence-rate. Therefore, this requires treatment in a centre specialised in oesophageal surgery.

Background: Isolated local recurrent or persistent esophageal cancer (EC) after curative intended definitive (dCRT) or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) with initially omitted surgery, is a potential indication for salvage surgery. We aimed to evaluate safety and efficacy of salvage surgery in these patients. Material and methods: A systematic literature search following PRISMA guidelines was performed using databases of PubMed/Medline. All included studies were performed in patients with persistent or recurrent EC after initial treatment with dCRT or nCRT, between 2007 and 2017. Survival analysis was performed with an inverse-variance weighting method. Results: Of the 278 identified studies, 28 were eligible, including a total of 1076 patients. Postoperative complications after salvage esophagectomy were significantly more common among patients with isolated persistent than in those with locoregional recurrent EC, including respiratory (36.6% versus 22.7%; difference in proportion 10.9 with 95% confidence interval (CI) [3.1; 18.7]) and cardiovascular complications (10.4% versus 4.5%; difference in proportion 5.9 with 95% CI [1.5; 10.2]). The pooled estimated 30-and 90-day mortality was 2.6% [1.6; 3.6] and 8.0% [6.3; 9.8], respectively. The pooled estimated 3-year and 5-year overall survival (OS) were 39.0% (95% CI: [35.8; 42.2]) and 19.4% [95% CI:16.5; 22.4], respectively. Patients with isolated persistent or recurrent EC after initial CRT had similar 5-year OS (14.0% versus 19.7%, difference in proportion -5.7, 95% CI [-13.7; 2.3]). Conclusions: Salvage surgery is a potentially curative procedure in patients with locally recurrent or persistent esophageal cancer and can be performed safely after definitive or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy when surgery was initially omitted. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd, BASO similar to The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.

Background: Patients with pathologic limited or no response (pNR) to neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) are subjected to curative intended esophagectomy with subsequent perioperative morbidity and mortality, but potentially only harm from nCRT. The primary aim of this study was to compare the overall survival (OS) of patients with pNR and patients who underwent primary esophagectomy to evaluate potentially benefits of nCRT in these patients. The secondary aim was to identify predictive clinicopathologic factors for pNR and pathologic complete response (pCR) to nCRT with the goal to preselect these patients before the start of treatment.Methods: From the period 2005 to 2016, 206 esophageal cancer (EC) patients treated with Carboplatin/Paclitaxel and radiotherapy with complementary esophagectomy were included in this cohort. OS of patients with pNR was compared with a historical cohort of primary surgically treated patients (n=218) after a propensity score matching resulting in a group of 68 patients with pNR after nCRT versus a group of 68 primary esophagectomy patients.Results: The OS in the pNR group and the primary esophagectomy group was comparable (P=0.986). No predictive factors were found in this cohort for pNR. Female gender (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.2-5.3) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.3-5.3) were identified as independent predictive factors for pCR.Conclusions: Patients with a pNR do not benefit from nCRT followed by resection. These patients had a similar OS as those who had a primary esophagectomy alone. Although this indicates that nCRT does not negatively impact the OS of patients with pNR, patients still have an increased morbidity because of nCRT. Hence, it is important to identify factors that predict pNR. The ability to predict pNR (and pCR) will enable tailored and personalized care preventing unnecessary nCRT with increased morbidity.

Background. Circumferential resection margins (CRM) for esophageal cancer (EC), defined by the College of American Pathologists (CAP; >0 mm) or the Royal College of Pathologists (RCP; >1 mm) as tumor-free (R0), are based on a surgery-alone approach. We evaluated the usefulness of both definitions in current practice with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).Methods. CRMs were measured in 209 patients (104 with nCRT) with locally advanced EC after transthoracic esophagectomy. Local recurrence and cancer related death were scored as events. Patients were followed for at least 2 years or until death. Prognostic factors (P Results. Independent prognostic factors (P Conclusions. nCRT affected the CRM cutoff values. After nCRT, the CRM R0 according to the CAP was only prognostic for 2-year LRFS. However, in the surgery-alone group, it was prognostic for both the 2-year DFS and LRFS.

Background. It has been suggested that markers associated with cancer stem cells (CSC) may play a role in esophageal cancer. Our aim was to investigate the expression pattern of proposed CSC markers ALDH1, Axin2, BMI1, CD44, and SOX2 in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and to relate their expression to survival.Methods. In this study we included 94 EAC patients and examined the expression of the above-mentioned markers by using immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays. Expression was scored as positive or negative or categorized as low or high in terms of an immunoreactivity score (IRS). Expression rates were related to clinicopathologic characteristics and overall and disease-free survival (DFS).Results. In a multivariate analysis, negative expression of CD44 and of SOX2 were both significant prognostic factors for DFS [hazard ratio (HR), 1.73; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 1.00-2.96; P = 0.046 and HR, 2.06; 95 % CI 1.14-3.70 P = 0.016). When CD44 and SOX2 expression were analyzed together, negative SOX2 expression was an independent prognostic factor for DFS (HR, 1.91; 95 % CI 1.05-3.46; P = 0.034). Low IRS scores for ALDH1 or Axin2 were associated with a reduced median survival (12.8 vs. 28.7 and 12.1 vs. 25.5 months, respectively). However, these markers and BMI1 were not prognostic factors for survival.Conclusions. Loss of CD44 expression and loss of SOX2 expression are prognostic factors of poor survival in EAC patients. This suggests a role of these proteins in EAC that requires further investigation.

To analyze the association between pretreatment 18-F-fluoro-deoxyglucose (FDG) uptake and characteristics of aggressive tumor biology in predicting outcome in esophageal cancer (EC).Tumor FDG-uptake was measured by maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) in 47 patients undergoing esophagectomy with curative intent. ROC analyses were used to predict an optimal SUVmax cutoff for survival. Expression of hexokinase-II (HK-II), glucose transporter I (GLUT-I), hypoxia inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-I alpha), vascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF-C), p53, and proliferative activity (Ki-67) were correlated with SUVmax values and clinicopathological characteristics.A SUVmax > 3.67 predicted a significantly lower disease-free survival (DFS) and distant recurrence-free survival (p = 0.022 and p = 0.005). High HK-II expression was correlated with reduced SUVmax values (p = 0.002) and was significantly higher in esophageal adenocarcinoma compared with squamous cell carcinoma (p = 0.005). Preoperative high FDG uptake in primary tumors was associated with nodal metastases (pN1; Spearman correlation 0.39, p = 0.01). We found no positive correlation between SUVmax and GLUT-1, HK-1, HIF-I alpha 1, VEGF-C, p53, and Ki-67 expression.High preoperative FDG-uptake strongly predicts poor survival outcome and is associated with lymph node metastases in EC patients. HK-II expression was related to SUVmax and DFS.

BACKGROUND: The risk of tumor progression during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in esophageal cancer (EC) is around 8% to 17%. We assessed the efficacy of computed tomography (CT) to identify these patients before esophagectomy.METHODS: Ninety-seven patients with locally advanced EC treated with Carboplatin/Paclitaxel and 41.4 Gy neoadjuvantly were restaged with CT. Two radiologists reviewed pre- and post-CRT CT images. The primary outcome was detection of clinically relevant progressive disease. Missed metastases were defined as metastatic disease found during surgery or within 3 months after post-CRT CT.RESULTS: Progressive disease was detected in 9 patients (9%). Both radiologists detected 5 patients with distant metastases (liver, n = 4; lung metastasis, n = 1), but missed progressive disease in 4 cases. One radiologist falsely assessed 2 metastatic lesions, but after agreement progressive disease was detected with sensitivity and specificity of 56% and 100%, respectively.CONCLUSION: CT is effective in detecting clinically relevant progressive disease in EC patients, after neoadjuvant treatment. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) on nodal micro-metastases (NMMs) in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) patients with histologically negative nodes ([y]pN0).METHODS: Of 48 consecutively treated patients with neoadjuvant CRT, we selected 20 EAC ypN0 patients (group 1). These patients were matched with 20 pN0 EAC patients who had surgery alone (group 2). Harvested (y) pN0 lymph nodes were examined immunohistochemically (anti-CK8/18 [CAM 5.2]) according to a validated sentinel node protocol. A 3rd group (n = 11) staged as ypN1 after neoadjuvant CRT was used as the control group.RESULTS: Upstaging to NMM+ occurred in 2 patients (10%) in group 1 and in 8 patients (40%) in group 2 (P = .028). Disease-free and overall survival rates in NMM+ patients in group 1 were worse compared with NMM- patients (P = .014 and P = .003, respectively) but comparable with ypN1 patients (n = 11).CONCLUSIONS: A 30% reduction of NMM+ was obtained after neoadjuvant treatment in (y) pN0 patients. NMM+ after CRT had a negative impact on survival in ypN1 patients. These data warrant further investigation in larger prospective datasets. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Definitive (chemo)radiotherapy is employed in esophageal cancer patients as an alternative for patients considered medically unfit for surgery or having unresectable tumors. We evaluated a population-based cohort to improve the selection for intensified nonsurgical strategies and to identify prognostic factors.Patients who had squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) or adenocarcinoma (AC) were treated in four referral centers in the north-east Netherlands with definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) or radiotherapy (dRT) between 1996 and 2008.Of the 287 included patients, 110 were treated with dCRT and 177 with dRT. Median overall survival (OS) was 11 months (95 % confidence interval: 10-12 months), with OS of 22 and 8 % and disease-free survival (DFS) of 16 and 5 % at 2 and 5 years, respectively. DFS at 2 and 5 years was 24 and 9 % for SCC versus 10 and 2 % for AC patients (P = 0.006). OS after 2 and 5 years was 29 and 14 % for SCC patients versus 17 and 3 % for AC patients (P = 0.044). On multivariate Cox regression, SCC was an independent prognostic factor for DFS [P = 0.020, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.71] and OS (P = 0.047, HR = 0.76). On matched cohort analysis, DFS was higher in the dCRT group compared with dRT patients (P = 0.016). The locoregional failure rate was lower in the dCRT group and in SCC patients (P = 0.001 and 0.046).Long-term results and the local control rate in SCC patients were better after definitive (chemo)radiotherapy compared with in AC patients. SCC was an independent prognostic factor for survival. Definitive chemoradiotherapy leads to improved local control rate and DFS.

147 Background: Involvement of the circumferential margin (CRM) is an important factor in esophageal cancer (EC) patients. CRM definitions are commonly based on the College of American Pathologists (CAP) at 0 mm and the Royal College of Pathologists (RCP) at >1 mm. We evaluated which CRM definition is useful in current practice with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and whether the CRM cut-off value differs after CRT. Methods: We prospectively included 209 patients (104 with CRT) with locally advanced EC (stage II-III), who underwent radical transthoracic esophagectomy. Patients were followed for at least 2 years after surgery or until death. Patients with 5cm), >0.2 L/N+ ratio, angioinvasion and CAP R0. In the surgery group; tumor length, >4 N+, angioinvasion and CAP R0 were independent prognostic factors (P

To evaluate the rate and pattern of recurrences after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in esophageal cancer patients.We described survival and differences in recurrences from a single center between neoadjuvant CRT (carboplatin/paclitaxel and 41.4 Gy) and surgery alone for the period 2000-2011. To reduce bias, we performed a propensity score matched analysis.A total of 204 patients were analyzed, 75 treated with neoadjuvant CRT and 129 with surgery alone. The pathologic response to neoadjuvant CRT was 69 % with a complete response rate of 25 %. After matching, baseline characteristics between the groups (both n = 75) were equally distributed. The 3- and 5-year disease-free survival was 53 and 42 % in the neoadjuvant CRT group compared with 24 and 18 % in the surgery-alone group (P = 0.011). After 3 and 5 years' CRT, patients had an estimated locoregional recurrence-free survival of 83 and 73 % compared with 52 and 49 % in the surgery-alone group (P = 0.015). The distant recurrence-free survival was comparable in both groups. Locoregional recurrences were located less in the paraesophageal lymph nodes in the CRT group than in the surgery-alone group, 9 versus 21 %, respectively (P = 0.041). With respect to differences in distant recurrences, we observed more skeletal recurrences in the surgery-alone group compared to CRT, 12 versus 1 % (P = 0.009).The neoadjuvant CRT regimen we used offers a significant improvement in outcome, with a different recurrence pattern compared with surgery alone. This effect is probably due to both the pathologic complete response and eradication of micrometastases in CRT group.

136 Background: The main objective of this study was to develop and validate a method to reconstruct the gross and clinical tumor volume (GTV and CTV) on the esophageal specimen in order to facilitate a good pathologic examination of the original tumor area after neo-adjuvant chemoradiation (CRT). Methods: The GTV and CTV borders of 25 patients were defined by a radiation oncologist on the planning CT in relation to 5 anatomical reference points. After CRT, the GTV and CTV borders were marked in vivo on the esophagus during surgical resection. Finally, the pathologist evaluated the presence of macroscopic and microscopic tumor in- and outside the GTV and CTV. The radiation tumor response was scored according to the standardized 5-tier Mandard classification. Radiation induced side effects were scored as well. Results: The Mandard classification could be scored on basis of the GTV alone in 68% of the cases (N=17). For the other patients (N=8), the GTV and the CTV should both be incorporated for correct evaluation of the tumor response. Five patients (20%) showed complete tumor response (Mandard 1), 68% (N=17) showed partial response (Mandard 2-3) and 12% (N=3) showed hardly any response (Mandard 4-5). In the partial responders, macroscopic tumor was found within the delineated GTV and microscopic tumor remained within the CTV both in 100% of the cases. In two patients (40%) with hardly any response, microscopic tumor was also found outside the CTV. This might be caused by tumor growth during the neo-adjuvant treatment or by geographical miss. Nine patients turned out to have positive lymph nodes. On average 18 (range 8-30) lymph nodes were evaluated per patients. Giant cell reactions, lymphocyte infiltration, and fibrosis, which indicate tumor regression were seen in the CTV and GTV, and were most pronounced in the GTV. Conclusions: This study suggested that demarcation of the GTV and CTV on the esophagus in vivo is important for standardized pathologic evaluation of the esophagus after neo-adjuvant chemoradiation. Furthermore using this method we determined microscopic tumor outside the CTV in 40% of the cases (N=2) of the bad responders (Mandard 4-5), illustrating the importance of our method in this patient category.

BACKGROUND: High recurrence rates determine the dismal outcome in esophageal cancer. We reviewed our experiences and defined prognostic factors and patterns of recurrences after curatively, intended transthoracic esophagectomy.METHODS: Between January 1991 and December 2005, 212 consecutive patients underwent a radical transthoracic esophagectomy with extended 2-field lymphadenectomy. Recurrence rates, survival, and prognostic factors were analyzed (minimal follow-up period, 2 y).RESULTS: Radicality was obtained in 85.6%. The median follow-up period was 26.6 months. The overall recurrence rate at I, 3, and 5 years was 28%, 44%, and 64%, respectively, and locoregional recurrence rate was 17%, 27%, and 43%, respectively. Overall survival rates, including postoperative deaths, were 45% and 34% at 3 and 5 years, respectively. pT stage and lymph node (LN) ratio greater than .20 were independent prognostic factors for survival and recurrences. Radicality was most prognostic for survival, and for N+ greater than 4 positive LN for recurrences.CONCLUSIONS: Radicality and LN ratio are strong prognostic factors. High radicality and adequate nodal assessment are guaranteed by an extended transthoracic approach. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

83 Background: Definitive (chemo)radiation as primary treatment modality is offered to esophageal cancer (EC) patients, as an alternative for patients considered medically unfit for surgery or having irresectable tumors. We evaluated the results in our cohort to improve selection of patients for intensified non-surgical strategies and to identify which clinical factors have a prognostic impact on the overall (OS) and disease free survival (DFS). Methods: EC patients treated with definitive radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) from 4 radiotherapy referral centers between 1996 and 2008 were used. Only patients with squamouscellcarcinoma (SCC) or adenocarcinoma (AC) were included in the analyses. Results: In total 278 patients were identified of whom 106 (38.1%) were treated with CRT (platinum based, median 50.4 (46.8 – 70)Gy) and 172 (61.9%) with RT alone (median 60 (40-70)Gy). T- stage was cT1=5.6%;cT2=15.3%;cT3=60.9% and cT4=18.2%. Nodal stage consisted of cN0=35%;cN1=65%, including cM1a=5.8%. The male/female ratio was 78.3% to 21.7%. AC occurred in 57.6% and 42.4% had a SCC. The median age was 69 years. Median OS time was 11 (1-166) months with an OS of 45%, 22% and 6% and a DFS of 32%, 18% and 6% at 1, 2 and 5 years, respectively. There was no significant difference between the CRT and RT group in OS (p=0.09) and DFS (p=0.17). The DFS after 2 and 5 year was 25% and 12% for SCC patients versus 11% and 0% for AC patients (p=0.007). The OS at 2 and 5 year was 28% and 11% for SCC versus 14% and 0% for AC patients (p=0.020). Initial recurrence was seen locoregionally in 66.7% and distant metastases occurred in 33.3%. Common sites for distant recurrence were the liver with 52.4%, 17.5% bones and 15.5% lungs. Patients with SCC had a better response to (chemo)radiotherapy considering the OS (p=0.02, HR=0.7) and DFS (p=0.01, HR=0.69) in a multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Patients with a SCC esophageal tumor have better long-term results then AC patients after definitive (chemo)radiation. In this patient group SCC seems to be a strong prognostic factor for both OS and DFS. Furthermore the difference between RT and CRT is still small.

73 Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) is important in the treatment ofesophageal cancer. Rationales are tumor-downstaging and elimination of micrometastases improving resectability and curability rate. In this study we evaluated the effect of neo-adjuvant CRT on nodal micrometastases (NMM) in pN0 esophageal cancer patients. Methods: From a prospective database, we selected a matched group of patients on cT-stage, histological type and treatment without (group 1) or with neo-adjuvant CRT (group 2). Patients were staged by EUS, PET-scan, CT-scan and EUS guided cytology. CRT was given in a randomized clinical trial and consisted of paclitaxel 50 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC = 2 for 5 weeks and concurrent radiotherapy (41.4 Gy/23 frs). All patients (n = 19) underwent a curative intended transthoracic esophagectomy with extended 2-field nodal dissection. After reviewing routine pathological examination all tumors were confirmed as stage pN0. Four sections of every examined lymph node (n = 261) were made at different levels according to a sentinel node protocol and further analyzed immunohistochemically with anti-CK8/18 (CAM 5.2) to detect NMM. Results: Patients characteristics were equally distributed. All patients had a microscopically radical (R0) resection. In group 2 (n = 9) the response rate was 55% which was complete (CR) in 33%. The median number of resected nodes was comparable: 15 ± 6.5 and 15 ± 5.6 in both groups. Thirtheen of the 261 (5%) pN0 nodes in these 19 pts contained NMM. In group 1 (n = 10); 12 of the 136 (9%) examined pN0 lymph nodes were positive and in group 2 only one of the 125 (0.8%) examined pN0 nodes was positive (p = 0.003). NMM were found in 7 pts (70%) in group 1 and in only one patient (11%) in group 2 (p = 0.02). Interestingly, this last patient had responded well to CRT. Conclusions: Neo-adjuvant CRT seems to have a significant impact on the numbers of NMMs in esophageal cancer. Based on the presence of NMM even in patients with good responses, we still advocate a curatively intended nodal dissection. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

In esophageal cancer, circumferential resection margins (CRMs) are considered to be of relevant prognostic value, but a reliable definition of tumor-free CRM is still unclear. The aim of this study was to appraise the clinical prognostic value of microscopic CRM involvement and to determine the optimal limit of CRM.To define the optimal tumor-free CRM we included 98 consecutive patients who underwent extended esophagectomy with microscopic tumor-free resection margins (R0) between 1997 and 2006. CRMs were measured in tenths of millimeters with inked lateral margins. Outcome of patients with CRM involvement was compared with a statistically comparable control group of 21 patients with microscopic positive resection margins (R1).A cutoff point of CRM at a parts per thousand currency sign1.0 mm and > 1.0 mm appeared to be an adequate marker for survival and prognosis (both P 0 mm was equal to that in patients with CRM of 0 mm (P = 0.43). CRM involvement was an independent prognostic factor for both recurrent disease (P = 0.001) and survival (P Involvement of the circumferential resection margins is an independent prognostic factor for recurrent disease and survival in esophageal cancer. The optimal limit for a positive CRM is a parts per thousand currency sign1 mm and for a free CRM is > 1.0 mm. Patients with unfavorable CRM should be approached as patients with R1 resection with corresponding outcome.