Search

This study was designed to determine the effect of prenatal lipopolysaccharide (LPS) exposure on the postnatal metabolic response to an LPS challenge in beef heifers. Pregnant, crossbred cows ( = 50) were assigned to a prenatal immune stimulation (PIS; = 25; administered 0.1 µg/kg BW LPS subcutaneously 233 ± 15d of gestation) or saline treatment group (Control; = 25). Birth and weaning BW of calves were collected. There was not (> 0.05) a treatment × gender interaction for birth weight or 205-d adjusted weaning BW. Treatment did not affect (> 0.05) birth BW, but steers and heifers of PIS cows had greater ( < 0.02) 205-d adjusted weaning BW than offspring from Control cows. From the 2 prenatal treatment groups, heifer calves ( = 12 PIS, 11 Control) were identified at weaning (238 ± 15 d of age) to subsequently receive an LPS challenge. On d 0, heifers were fitted with indwelling jugular catheters and were moved into individual pens. On d 1, heifers (fed at 0600 h) were challenged i.v. with LPS (0.5 µg/kg BW) at 0 h (1000 h). Blood samples were collected at 30-min intervals from -2 to 8 h and again at 24 h relative to the LPS challenge. There was a treatment × time interaction ( < 0.01) for cortisol; PIS heifers had greater cortisol from 4 to 6.5 h post-LPS challenge ( < 0.001). There was a treatment × time interaction ( = 0.04) for serum glucose such that glucose was greater ( = 0.01) in PIS than Control heifers at 0.5 h, but was greater in Control than PIS heifers at 2, 4.5, and 7 h post-LPS challenge. This resulted in overall time ( < 0.01) and treatment ( < 0.01) effects such that Control heifers had greater glucose concentrations than PIS heifers. There was a tendency ( = 0.10) for a treatment × time interaction for serum NEFA, such that NEFA was greater in Control than PIS heifers at -2, -1.5, and 7 h relative to the LPS challenge ( ≤ 0.02). Also, there were time ( < 0.01) and treatment effects ( < 0.01) for NEFA with Control heifers having greater NEFA than PIS heifers. Serum BUN was affected by a treatment × time interaction ( < 0.01). Concentrations of BUN were greater in PIS heifers from -1.5 to -1 h, 1 to 2 h, at 4 h, and from 5 to 24 h relative to the LPS challenge. These results demonstrate postnatal growth and the metabolic responses of weaned beef calves can be significantly altered with a single exposure to LPS in utero.

Acknowledgment that modern livestock production systems impose stress on animals has been accepted by the scientific community and producers. As the economic burden has increased for livestock producers, expectations for animal performance have increased, thus placing more strain on the entire production system. Whether or not periodic exposure to stress within the production system jeopardizes the well-being of animals continues to be an area of debate largely because of the inability to accurately quantify the magnitude and severity of the stress response on other biological systems. Adding to the confusion is the fact that activation of the stress axis can be both beneficial and detrimental to the body depending on the duration of the stress response and the frequency at which an animal is exposed to stressful stimuli. Few would argue that continuous long-term stress inhibits livestock productivity and overall well-being. Less clear is whether or not occasional exposure to acute stress jeopardizes the productivity and well-being of livestock. To fully appreciate the complexity associated with activation of the stress axis and the overall biological impact on the body, one must delve deep into the scientific literature and examine the science in an unbiased manner. It is imperative to appreciate and understand that activation of the stress axis is an essential survival mechanism necessary to maintain homeostasis during biologically challenging times. Acute activation of the stress axis leads to repartitioning of energy to organs and tissues essential for coping with stress, redirection of blood flow from the peripheral to large muscle groups, decreased digestive function, and priming of the immune system to prepare for subsequent infections. Conversely, chronic activation of the stress axis disrupts digestive function, causes catabolism of muscle and adipose tissue, and suppresses overall immune function, thus making an animal more susceptible to disease. But what parameters are needed to distinguish periods of acute stress from those of chronic stress, and what biological markers are the best indicators of "stress" in an animal? Although there are a plethora of physiological responses and endocrine biomarkers that can be quantified, an integrative tool that has been readily embraced by scientists and producers as an effective and efficient indicator of the duration and magnitude of stress that an animal is experiencing has yet to be identified.

The response of the immune and stress systems have been assessed in response to a lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge, yet the role of metabolism in mediating energy requirements during the acute phase response has not been sufficiently studied. This study tested heat-tolerant (Romosinuano [RO]) and heat-sensitive (Angus [ANG]) Bos taurus breeds at different ambient temperatures (Ta) to determine differential metabolic responses to LPS challenge. Twenty-one heifers (ANG: n = 11, 306 ± 26 kg BW; RO: n = 10, 313 ± 32 kg BW) were housed in stanchions in 4 temperature-controlled chambers. Initially, Ta in all 4 chambers was cycling at thermoneutrality (TN; 18.5°C-23.5°C) for a 1-wk adjustment period, followed by an increase in 2 chambers to cycling heat stress (HS; 24°C-38°C) for 2 wk. Five ANG and 5 RO heifers were housed at TN, whereas 6 ANG and 5 RO heifers were housed at HS. On day 19, heifers were fitted with jugular catheters. On day 20, heifers were challenged with LPS (0.5 μg/kg BW; 0 h), and blood samples were collected from -2 to 8 h and at 24 h relative to LPS challenge. Serum was analyzed for glucose, insulin, and NEFA concentrations. In addition, feed intake was measured 3 d before and on the day of the challenge. Feed intake decreased over time (P < 0.001) and was decreased in heifers housed at HS compared with heifers housed at TN (P = 0.013). Glucose concentrations before LPS challenge were greater in RO (P = 0.01) than in ANG heifers and greater in TN-housed heifers (P = 0.02) than in HS heifers. Glucose after LPS challenge initially increased before decreasing below baseline concentrations (P < 0.01) in all heifers. In addition, there was a breed by Ta interaction (P < 0.004), such that HS decreased glucose concentrations in ANG heifers compared with ANG heifers housed at TN (P < 0.001), whereas HS did not affect glucose concentrations after LPS challenge in RO heifers (P = 0.941). Nonesterified fatty acid concentrations before LPS challenge were not affected by breed (P = 0.37) or Ta (P = 0.60). Although NEFA concentration after LPS challenge was unaffected by Ta (P = 0.78), there tended to be a breed by Ta interaction (P = 0.07) such that, when housed at HS, RO heifers had greater serum NEFA concentrations after LPS challenge than ANG heifers (P = 0.009). Insulin concentration before LPS challenge was greater in RO heifers than in ANG heifers (P < 0.01). Insulin after LPS challenge increased (P < 0.01), with RO heifers producing a greater insulin response than ANG heifers (P < 0.01). These data suggest that HS decreases the metabolic response of heat-sensitive ANG heifers in response to LPS challenge, thus providing physiological evidence that may explain differences observed in the acute phase response between heat-sensitive ANG and heat-tolerant RO cattle breeds., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)