Search

Purpose: Thalidomide is effective in the treatment of newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). However, the role of thalidomide in the post-autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) context remains unclear. This study assessed whether the addition of thalidomide consolidation following ASCT would improve the durability of responses achieved and overall survival., Patients and Methods: Between January 2002 and March 2005, 269 patients with newly diagnosed MM who achieved disease stabilization or better with conventional induction chemotherapy received a single high-dose melphalan conditioned ASCT. Post-ASCT, 129 patients were randomly assigned to receive indefinite prednisolone maintenance therapy (control group) and 114 to receive the same in addition to 12 months of thalidomide consolidation (thalidomide group). The primary study end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The secondary end point was tolerability., Results: After a median follow-up of 3 years, the postrandomization 3-year PFS rates were 42% and 23% (P < .001; hazard ratio [HR], 0.5; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.71) and the OS rates were 86% and 75% (P = .004; HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.76) in the thalidomide and control groups, respectively. There was no difference in survival between groups 12 months after disease progression (79% v 77%; P = .237). Neurological toxicities were more common in the thalidomide arm but there were no differences between arms for thromboembolic events., Conclusion: Consolidation therapy with 12 months of thalidomide combined with prednisolone prolongs survival when used after a single high-dose therapy supported ASCT in patients with newly diagnosed MM. Furthermore, thalidomide consolidation therapy did not adversely impact on survival in the subsequent salvage setting.

Late-onset combined immunodeficiency (LOCID), considered now a subset of common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) disorders, is characterized by a predominantly T-cell immune defect. LOCID has a distinct phenotype from CVID with a greater risk of lymphoproliferative complications. As compared to the CVID cohort, LOCID patients also have increased rates of splenomegaly and granulomatous disease. We report a case of central nervous system (CNS) T-cell lymphoma in a 67-year-old male as the presenting manifestation of LOCID. The patient achieved a complete response to therapy after 4 cycles of MATRix (methotrexate, cytarabine, and thiotepa) and 2 cycles of ICE (etoposide, carboplatin, and ifosfamide) chemotherapy followed by CNS-directed autologous stem cell transplantation. Intravenous immunoglobulin replacement was commenced to address the underlying immunodeficiency. Pulmonary lesions consistent with a diagnosis of granulomatous and lymphocytic interstitial lung disease (GLILD) were identified as a second noninfectious complication of LOCID. The pulmonary lesions resolved after chemotherapy and immunoglobulin replacement. The patient remains well with no evidence of disease recurrence now more than 18 months after completion of therapy. This is the first reported case of T-cell lymphoma in an adult patient with LOCID. Further study is needed to elucidate the mechanisms of transformation of B- or T-cells to lymphoproliferation in primary immunodeficiency patients as well as research to inform evidence-based therapeutic strategies for this challenging cohort of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The phase 2 portion of this open-label phase 2/3 study assessed the efficacy and safety of blinatumomab as second salvage for aggressive relapsed or refractory (r/r) aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) following platinum-based first salvage chemotherapy. Forty-one patients with aggressive disease (32% relapsed; 68% refractory) enrolled and received stepwise blinatumomab (9–28–112 μg/day) in a 70-day cycle 1 and an optional 28-day cycle 2; 19 (46%) completed cycle 1 and 3 (7%) completed cycle 2. The overall response rate after 12 weeks was 37%, including 9 (22%) complete metabolic responses. Eight (20%) patients (all responders) subsequently received stem cell transplants. Grade ≥3 adverse events were reported in 29 (71%) patients. Grade 3 cytokine release syndrome occurred in one patient. Grade 3 neurologic events occurred in 10 (24%) patients; all resolved. Blinatumomab monotherapy appears effective as second salvage therapy in patients with r/r aggressive B-NHL. Trial registration: NCT02910063. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To assess therapeutic levels, safety and tolerability of a novel formulation SUBA-itraconazole (where SUBA stands for SUper BioAvailability) when compared with conventional itraconazole liquid when used as antifungal prophylaxis in patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT or in haematological malignancy patients with an intermediate/high risk of invasive fungal infection (IFI).Methods: This was a single-institution, prospective cohort study using a historical control group as the comparator.Results: A total of 57 patients were assessed: 27 in the SUBA-itraconazole cohort and 30 in the liquid itraconazole cohort. Therapeutic concentrations were achieved significantly more quickly in the SUBA-itraconazole group: median of 6 (95% CI 5-11) days versus 14 (95% CI 12-21) days in the liquid itraconazole group (P < 0.0001). At day 10, therapeutic concentrations were achieved in 69% (95% CI 44%-81%) of the SUBA-itraconazole group versus 21% (95% CI 7%-33%) of the liquid itraconazole group (P < 0.0001). The mean trough serum concentrations at steady-state of SUBA-itraconazole were significantly higher, with less interpatient variability [1577 ng/mL, coefficient of variation (CV) 35%] versus liquid itraconazole (1218 ng/mL, CV 60%) (P < 0.001). There were two (7.4%) treatment failures in the SUBA-itraconazole group, both due to cessation of therapy for mucositis, compared with seven (23.3%) treatment failures in the liquid itraconazole group, due to subtherapeutic levels (five), mucositis (one) and gastrointestinal intolerance (one) (P = 0.096).Conclusions: The use of the SUBA-itraconazole formulation was associated with more rapid attainment of therapeutic levels with less interpatient variability compared with conventional liquid itraconazole when used as IFI prophylaxis in allogeneic HSCT or intermediate-/high-IFI risk haematological malignancy patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]