Back to Search Start Over

Serum levels, safety and tolerability of new formulation SUBA-itraconazole prophylaxis in patients with haematological malignancy or undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Authors :
Lindsay, Julian
Sandaradura, Indy
Wong, Kelly
Arthur, Chris
Stevenson, William
Kerridge, Ian
Fay, Keith
Coyle, Luke
Greenwood, Matthew
Source :
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (JAC); Dec2017, Vol. 72 Issue 12, p3414-3419, 6p
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

<bold>Objectives: </bold>To assess therapeutic levels, safety and tolerability of a novel formulation SUBA-itraconazole (where SUBA stands for SUper BioAvailability) when compared with conventional itraconazole liquid when used as antifungal prophylaxis in patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT or in haematological malignancy patients with an intermediate/high risk of invasive fungal infection (IFI).<bold>Methods: </bold>This was a single-institution, prospective cohort study using a historical control group as the comparator.<bold>Results: </bold>A total of 57 patients were assessed: 27 in the SUBA-itraconazole cohort and 30 in the liquid itraconazole cohort. Therapeutic concentrations were achieved significantly more quickly in the SUBA-itraconazole group: median of 6 (95% CI 5-11) days versus 14 (95% CI 12-21) days in the liquid itraconazole group (P < 0.0001). At day 10, therapeutic concentrations were achieved in 69% (95% CI 44%-81%) of the SUBA-itraconazole group versus 21% (95% CI 7%-33%) of the liquid itraconazole group (P < 0.0001). The mean trough serum concentrations at steady-state of SUBA-itraconazole were significantly higher, with less interpatient variability [1577 ng/mL, coefficient of variation (CV) 35%] versus liquid itraconazole (1218 ng/mL, CV 60%) (P < 0.001). There were two (7.4%) treatment failures in the SUBA-itraconazole group, both due to cessation of therapy for mucositis, compared with seven (23.3%) treatment failures in the liquid itraconazole group, due to subtherapeutic levels (five), mucositis (one) and gastrointestinal intolerance (one) (P = 0.096).<bold>Conclusions: </bold>The use of the SUBA-itraconazole formulation was associated with more rapid attainment of therapeutic levels with less interpatient variability compared with conventional liquid itraconazole when used as IFI prophylaxis in allogeneic HSCT or intermediate-/high-IFI risk haematological malignancy patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03057453
Volume :
72
Issue :
12
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (JAC)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
126415126
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkx295