Search

Background: The percentage of women <50 years of age hospitalized with myocardial infarction is increasing. We describe the clinical, morphological, and biological characteristics, as well as the clinical outcomes of this population., Methods and Results: This prospective, observational study included consecutive women <50 years of age admitted for myocardial infarction at 30 centers in France (May 2017-June 2019). The primary outcome was the composite of net adverse clinical events: all-cause death, cardiovascular death, recurrent myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, any stroke, or major bleeding occurring during hospitalization with a 12-month follow up. Three hundred fourteen women were included. The mean age was 43.0 (±5.7) years, 60.8% presented with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, 75.5% were current smokers, 31.2% had a history of complicated pregnancy, and 55.1% reported recent emotional stress. Most (91.6%) women presented with typical chest pain. Of patients on an estrogen-containing contraceptive, 86.0% had at least 1 contraindication. Of patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, 17.8% had myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries and 14.6% had spontaneous coronary artery dissection, whereas 29.3% presented with multivessel vessel disease. During hospitalization, 11 net adverse clinical events occurred in 9 (2.8%) women, but no deaths or stent thromboses occurred. By 12 months, 14 net adverse clinical events occurred in 10 (3.2%) women; 2 (0.6%) died (from progressive cancer) and 25 (7.9%) had an ischemia-driven repeat percutaneous coronary intervention., Conclusions: Most young women with myocardial infarction reported typical chest pain and had modifiable cardiovascular risk factors. History of adverse pregnancy outcomes and prescription of combined oral contraceptive despite a contraindication were prevalent, emphasizing the need for comprehensive cardiological and gynecological evaluation and follow-up., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03073447.

Our objective was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of the SYNERGY stent (Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, Massachusetts) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The only drug-eluting stent approved for treatment of STEMI by the Food and Drug Administration is the Taxus stent (Boston Scientific) which is no longer commercially available, so further data are needed. The CLEAR (Colchicine and spironolactone in patients with myocardial infarction) SYNERGY stent registry was embedded into a larger randomized trial of patients with STEMI (n = 7,000), comparing colchicine versus placebo and spironolactone versus placebo. The primary outcome for the SYNERGY stent registry is major adverse cardiac events (MACE) as defined by cardiovascular death, recurrent MI, or unplanned ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization within 12 months. We estimated a MACE rate of 6.3% at 12 months after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI based on the Thrombectomy vs percutaneous coronary intervention alone in STEMI (TOTAL) trial. Success was defined as upper bound of confidence interval (CI) to be less than the performance goal of 9.45%. Overall, 733 patients were enrolled from 8 countries with a mean age 60 years, 19.4% diabetes mellitus, 41.3% anterior MI, and median door-to-balloon time of 72 minutes. The MACE rate was 4.8% (95% CI 3.2 to 6.3%) at 12 months which met the success criteria against performance goal of 9.45%. The rates of cardiovascular death, recurrent MI, or target vessel revascularization were 2.7%, 1.9%, 1.0%, respectively. The rates of acute definite stent thrombosis were 0.3%, subacute 0.4%, late 0.4%, and cumulative stent thrombosis of 1.1% at 12 months. In conclusion, the SYNERGY stent in STEMI performed well and was successful compared with the performance goal based on previous trials., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Jolly reports financial support was provided by Boston Scientific Corp. Dr. Jolly reports financial support was provided by Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Dr. Sabate reports consulting for Abbott Vascular and iVascular. Natalia Pinilla-Echeverri reports consulting for Conavi, Amgen, Bayer, and Novartis; financial support provided by Abbott Vascular; and an advisory board position at Philips. Dr. Mehta reports consulting for and financial support provided by Abbott, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, HLS Therapeutics, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, and Novo Nordisk. The remaining authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In patients with multivessel disease with successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, the FLOWER-MI trial (Flow Evaluation to Guide Revascularization in Multivessel ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) showed that a fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided strategy was not superior to an angiography-guided strategy for treatment of noninfarct-related artery lesions regarding the 1-year risk of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or unplanned hospitalization leading to urgent revascularization. The extension phase of the trial was planned using the same primary outcome to determine whether a difference in outcomes would be observed with a longer follow-up., Methods: In this multicenter trial, we randomly assigned patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease with successful percutaneous coronary intervention of the infarct-related artery to receive complete revascularization guided by either FFR (n=586) or angiography (n=577)., Results: After 3 years, a primary outcome event occurred in 52 of 498 patients (9.40%) in the FFR-guided group and in 44 of 502 patients (8.17%) in the angiography-guided group (hazard ratio, 1.19 [95% CI, 0.79-1.77]; P =0.4). Death occurred in 22 patients (4.00%) in the FFR-guided group and in 23 (4.32%) in the angiography-guided group (hazard ratio, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.53-1.71]); nonfatal myocardial infarction in 23 (4.13%) and 14 (2.56%), respectively (hazard ratio, 1.63 [95% CI, 0.84-3.16]); and unplanned hospitalization leading to urgent revascularization in 21 (3.83%) and 18 (3.36%; hazard ratio, 1.15 [95% CI, 0.61-2.16]), respectively., Conclusions: Although event rates in the trial were lower than expected, in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing complete revascularization, an FFR-guided strategy did not have a significant benefit over an angiography-guided strategy with respect to the risk of death, myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularization up to 3 years., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02943954., Competing Interests: Disclosures None.

Background: Postprocedural anticoagulation (PPA) is frequently administered after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, although no conclusive data support this practice., Methods: The RIGHT trial (Comparison of Anticoagulation Prolongation vs no Anticoagulation in STEMI Patients After Primary PCI) was an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, superiority trial conducted at 53 centers in China. Patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention were randomly assigned by center to receive low-dose PPA or matching placebo for at least 48 hours. Before trial initiation, each center selected 1 of 3 PPA regimens (40 mg of enoxaparin once daily subcutaneously; 10 U·kg·h of unfractionated heparin intravenously, adjusted to maintain activated clotting time between 150 and 220 seconds; or 0.2 mg·kg·h of bivalirudin intravenously). The primary efficacy objective was to demonstrate superiority of PPA to reduce the primary efficacy end point of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, stent thrombosis (definite), or urgent revascularization (any vessel) within 30 days. The key secondary objective was to evaluate the effect of each specific anticoagulation regimen (enoxaparin, unfractionated heparin, or bivalirudin) on the primary efficacy end point. The primary safety end point was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3 to 5 bleeding at 30 days., Results: Between January 10, 2019, and September 18, 2021, a total of 2989 patients were randomized. The primary efficacy end point occurred in 37 patients (2.5%) in both the PPA and placebo groups (hazard ratio, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.63 to 1.57]). The incidence of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3 to 5 bleeding did not differ between the PPA and placebo groups (8 [0.5%] vs 11 [0.7%] patients; hazard ratio, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.30 to 1.83])., Conclusions: Routine PPA after primary percutaneous coronary intervention was safe but did not reduce 30-day ischemic events., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03664180., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Yan was funded by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82100260) and Beijing Hospitals Authority Youth Program (QML20210605). Dr X. Wang was funded by grants from National Key Research & Development Program of China (2022YFC2505600), Beijing Nova Program (Z201100006820087), Interdisciplinary Cooperation Project of Beijing Nova Program (Z211100002121165), and Natural Science Foundation of Beijing, China (7222046). Dr Ma reports honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bayer, and AstraZeneca for giving lectures. Dr Vicaut reports consulting fees from Abbott and Bristol-Myers Squibb. Dr Montalescot reports research grants to the institution or consulting or lecture fees from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Ascendia, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Boston-Scientific, Celecor, CSL Behring, Idorsia, Lilly, Novartis, Novo, Opalia, Pfizer, Quantum Genomics, Sanofi, and Terumo. Dr Nie was funded by Beijing Hospitals Authority Clinical Medicine Development of Special Funding support (grant ZLRK202318), National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant 82270258), and Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission, China (grant Z221100003522027), and reports research grants to the institution from Boston Scientific, Abbott, Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals, China Resources Sanjiu Medical & Pharmaceuticals, and East China Pharmaceuticals. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Background: The effect of administering a crushed prasugrel loading dose is uncertain in patients presenting with a large myocardial infarction and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)., Aims: The aim of this study was to investigate if patients with a large myocardial infarction may benefit from prehospital administration of a crushed prasugrel loading dose., Methods: Patients from the CompareCrush trial with an available ambulance electrocardiography (ECG) were included in the study. An independent core laboratory confirmed a prehospital large myocardial area. We compared pre- and postprocedural angiographic markers, including Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 3 flow in the infarct-related artery, high thrombus burden, and myocardial blush grade 3, in STEMI patients with and without a prehospital large myocardial area., Results: Ambulance ECG was available for 532 patients, of whom 331 patients were identified with a prehospital large myocardial area at risk. Crushed prasugrel significantly improved postprocedural TIMI 3 flow rates in STEMI patients with a prehospital large myocardial area at risk (92% vs 79%, odds ratio [OR] 3.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.50-6.00) but not in STEMI patients without a prehospital large myocardial area at risk (91% vs 95%, OR 0.47, 95% CI: 0.14-1.57; p interaction =0.009)., Conclusions: Administration of crushed prasugrel may improve postprocedural TIMI 3 flow in STEMI patients with signs of a large myocardial area at risk on the ambulance ECG. The practice of crushing tablets of prasugrel loading dose might, therefore, represent a safe, fast and cost-effective strategy to improve myocardial reperfusion in this high-risk STEMI subgroup undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Background: Anterior acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is associated with an increased risk of left ventricular (LV) thrombus formation. We hypothesized that adding low-dose oral rivaroxaban to the usual antiplatelet regimen would reduce the risk of LV thrombus in patients with large AMI., Study Design: APERITIF is an investigator-initiated, multicenter randomized open-label, blinded end-point (PROBE) trial, nested in the ongoing "FRENCHIE" registry, a French multicenter prospective observational study, in which all consecutive patients admitted within 48 hours of symptom onset in a cardiac Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for AMI are included (NCT04050956). Among them, patients with anterior ST-elevation-myocardial infarction (STEMI) or very high-risk non- ST-elevation-myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients with involvement of the left anterior descending artery are randomized into 2 groups: Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) alone or DAPT plus rivaroxaban 2.5mg twice daily for 4 weeks, started as soon as possible after completion of the initial percutaneous coronary intervention/angiography procedure. The primary endpoint is the presence of LV thrombus at 1 month, as detected by contrast enhanced CMR (CE-CMR). Secondary endpoints include LV thrombus dimension (greatest diameter), the rate of major bleedings and major cardiovascular events at 1 month. Based on estimated event rates, a sample size of 560 patients is needed to show superiority of DAPT plus rivaroxaban therapy versus DAPT alone, with 80% power., Conclusion: The APERITIF trial will determine whether, in patients with large AMIs, the use of rivaroxaban 2.5mg twice daily in addition to DAPT reduces LV thrombus formation, compared with DAPT alone., Clinicaltrials: gov Identifier: NCT05077683., Competing Interests: Disclosures EP has received fees for lectures and/or consulting: Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, BMS, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, The Medicine Company, Sanofi, Saint Jude Medical, Servier, Siemens. BAYER is a sponsor of the trial., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The WAMIF study was conducted from 2017 to 2019 to include 314 patients in 30 French investigative centers in France. We have systematically collected the clinical, morphological and biological characteristics of cases of myocardial infarction affecting women under 50 years of age and evaluated their short-term (intra-hospital) and mid-term (at 12 months) prognosis. . The main results were: a particularly high incidence of modifiable risk factors affecting 86% of patients with smoking in the first place in 75% of them. The clinical presentation revealed chest pain in more than 90% of cases. The pathophysiological forms of acute coronary syndrome identified the culprit artery in 90% of cases, MI without obstruction (MINOCA) was found in 17.8% of the ST elevation MI (STEMI), spontaneous dissection in 14.6% of STEMI and 16.3% of NSTEMI. Hospital events included 3 strokes, 3 cases of bleeding and no deaths. At 12 months, follow-up showed no cardiovascular deaths. The results of this study allow us to better understand the particularities of cardiovascular diseases in women and thus to develop targeted strategies for prevention and improvement of their management., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: The mechanisms underlying the increased risk of bleeding that female patients with ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) exhibit, remains unclear. The present report assessed sex-related differences in response to pre-hospital dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) initiation in patients with STEMI., Methods: The COMPARE CRUSH trial randomized patients presenting with STEMI to receive a pre-hospital loading dose of crushed or integral prasugrel tablets in the ambulance. In this substudy, we compared platelet reactivity levels and the occurrence of high platelet reactivity (HPR; defined as platelet reactivity ≥208) between sexes at 4 prespecified time points after DAPT initiation, and evaluated post-PCI bleeding between groups., Results: Out of 633 STEMI patients, 147 (23%) were female. Females compared with males presented with significantly higher levels of platelet reactivity and higher HPR rates at baseline (232 [IQR, 209-256] vs 195 [IQR, 171-220], P < .01, and 76% vs 41%, OR 4.58 [95%CI, 2.52-8.32], P < .01, respectively). Moreover, female sex was identified as the sole independent predictor of HPR at baseline (OR 5.67 [95%CI, 2.56-12.53], P < .01). Following DAPT initiation, levels of platelet reactivity and the incidence of HPR were similar between sexes. Post-PCI bleeding occurred more frequently in females compared with males (10% vs 2%, OR 6.02 [95%CI, 2.61-11.87], P < .01). Female sex was an independent predictor of post-PCI bleeding (OR 3.25 [95%CI, 1.09-9.72], P = .04)., Conclusions: In this contemporary STEMI cohort, female STEMI patients remain at risk of bleeding complications after primary PCI. However, this is not explained by sex-specific differences in the pharmacodynamic response to pre-hospital DAPT initiation., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Early and complete restoration of target vessel patency in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is associated with improved outcomes. Oral P2Y 12 inhibitors have failed to demonstrate either improved patency or reduced mortality when administered in the prehospital setting. Thus, there is a need for antiplatelet agents that achieve prompt and potent platelet inhibition, and that restore patency in the prehospital setting. Zalunfiban, a novel subcutaneously administered glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor designed for prehospital administration, has shown to achieve rapid, high-grade platelet inhibition that exceeds that of P2Y 12 inhibitors. Whether prehospital administration of zalunfiban can improve clinical outcome is unknown., Hypothesis: The present study is designed to assess the hypothesis that a single, prehospital injection of zalunfiban given in the ambulance, in addition to standard-of-care in patients with STEMI with intent to undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) will improve clinical outcome compared to standard-of-care with placebo., Study Design: The ongoing CELEBRATE trial (NCT04825743) is a phase 3, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, international trial. Patients with STEMI intended to undergo primary PCI will receive treatment with a single subcutaneous injection containing either zalunfiban dose 1 (0.110 mg/kg), zalunfiban dose 2 (0.130 mg/kg) or placebo, and the study drug will be administered in the ambulance before transportation to the hospital. A target of 2499 patients will be randomly assigned to one of the treatment groups in a 1:1:1 ratio, ie, to have approximately 833 evaluable patients per group. The primary efficacy outcome is a ranked 7-point scale on clinical outcomes. The primary safety outcome is severe or life-threatening bleeding according to the Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO) criteria., Summary: The CELEBRATE trial will assess whether a single prehospital subcutaneous injection of zalunfiban in addition to standard-of-care in patients with STEMI with intent to undergo primary PCI will result in improved clinical outcome., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To determine if the changes in the European Society Cardiology/European Atherosclerotic Society (ESC/EAS) guidelines improved the identification for primary prevention therapy in young adults at risk of a premature myocardial infarction., Methods: Patients admitted for a first ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in the ePARIS registry (n=2757) between 2010 and 2018 were classified by age: <55, 55-65 and >65 years old. Using Systematic Coronary Risk Estimation 2, we evaluated whether patients would have been detected and treated with primary prevention statins before their first STEMI based on the 2021 EAS/ESC guidelines versus 2019 and 2016 guidelines. Eligibility for intensive proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9i) in secondary prevention was also assessed., Results: Following 2021 ESC guidelines, 62.5% of individuals aged <55 years old would have been eligible for statins before their first STEMI, similarly to older age categories. In comparison, only 17% and 18% of young individuals would have been eligible for primary prevention statins prior to their first STEMI with 2016 and 2019 guidelines, compared with group 55-65 years (41% and 35%) and >65 years old (19% and 72%), p<0.01. After their first STEMI, 25% of patients <55 years would be eligible for PCSK9i, compared with 23.2% and 15% in patients aged 55-65 years and >65 years., Conclusions: The 2021 ESC guidelines allowed a much better detection of young individuals before their first STEMI than prior ESC guidelines. In secondary prevention, most of young individuals did not reach low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels recommended, but only one quarter would be eligible for PCSK9i., Competing Interests: Competing interests: GM reports research grants, funding or consulting fees from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Axis, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Boston-Scientific, Cell Prothera, CSL Behring, Idorsia, Leo-Pharma, Lilly, Medtronic, Novartis, Pfizer, Quantum Genomics, Sanofi and Terumo; MZ reports research grants, funding or consulting fees from Fédération Française de Cardiologie, Institut Servier, BMS/Pfizer and AstraZeneca; JS reports reports research grants, funding or consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer HealthCare SAS, Abbott Medical France SAS, Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim France, CSL Behring SA, Gilead Science, Sanofi-Aventis France, Stockholder of Pharmaseeds, Terumo France SAS and Zoll; MK reports research grants, funding or consulting fees from Fédération Française de Cardiologie, du Programme PHRC N, de l’Institut Servier et des honoraires de Bayer, Sanofi and Servier; PS reports research grants, funding or consulting fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer, Bouchara Recordati, Eli-Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Servier and Vifor; J-PC reports research grants, funding or consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Boston Scientific, Bristol-Myers Squibb, COR2ED, Lead-Up, Medtronic and WebMD; DS, PG, OB, DB and NP report no conflict of interests., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is one of the most deleterious complications of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)., Objectives: We systematically analyzed the clinical characteristics of STEMI patients with IHCA, as well as predictors and treatments associated with risk of IHCA, using a nationwide database., Methods: In the CCC-ACS (Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-Acute Coronary Syndrome) project (2014-2019), we stratified patients presenting with STEMI within 24 hours after symptom onset according to IHCA or no IHCA during the index hospitalization. We analyzed patients' clinical characteristics, mortality, and independent correlates of IHCA., Results: Of 40,670 STEMI patients, 2.2% (95% CI: 2.1%-2.4%) experienced IHCA. Among IHCA patients, the in-hospital mortality was 53.0% (95% CI: 49.7%-56.3%). IHCA represents 55.0% (95% CI: 51.6%-58.4%) of inpatient deaths. Age ≥75 years, female, nonsmoker, prior diabetes mellitus, prior renal failure, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, heart rate >100 beats/min, systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg, and Killip IV were identified as predictors of IHCA. IHCA patients were less likely to receive β-blockers and ticagrelor during the first 24 hours after first medical contact and were less likely to undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention. After adjustment, primary percutaneous coronary intervention (adjusted HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.71-0.95), β-blockers (adjusted HR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.47-0.86), and ticagrelor (adjusted HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.42-0.76) were associated with a reduced risk of IHCA., Conclusions: IHCA is rare in STEMI but is associated with high mortality. Multiple modifiable and unmodifiable factors are associated with its occurrence, suggesting that early intervention and rational drug treatment may improve its prognosis. (CCC Project- Acute Coronary Syndrome; NCT02306616)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The CCC-ACS project is a collaborative study of the American Heart Association and the Chinese Society of Cardiology. The American Heart Association has been funded by Pfizer and AstraZeneca for quality improvement initiatives through an independent grant. Dr Gong was funded by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81970292, 81600213), Beijing Hospitals Authority Youth Program (QML20190603), and CS Optimizing Antithrombotic Research Fund (BJUHFCSOARF201901-08). Dr Yan was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82100260) and Beijing Hospitals Authority Youth Program (QML20210605). Dr Ma has received honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Johnson and Johnson, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, and AstraZeneca for giving lectures. Dr Montalescot has received research grants to the institution or consulting/lecture fees from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cell-Prothera, Europa, IRIS-Servier, Novartis, Medtronic, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Quantum Genomics, and Sanofi. Dr Nie was funded by Natural Science Foundation of Beijing, China (7191002), National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020YFC2004800), National Natural Science Foundation of China (81670222), the Capital Health Research and Development of Special Fund (2018-1-2061), and Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals' Ascent Plan (DFL20180601); and has received research grants to the institution from Boston Scientific, Abbott, Jiangsu Hengrui, China Resources Sanjiu, and Huadong Medicine. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease, percutaneous coronary intervention for non-culprit lesions is superior to treatment of the culprit lesion alone. The optimal timing for non-infarct-related artery revascularization - immediate versus staged - has not been investigated adequately., Aim: We aimed to assess clinical outcomes at 1 year in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with multivessel disease using immediate versus staged non-infarct-related artery revascularization., Methods: Outcomes were analysed in patients from the randomized FLOWER-MI trial, in whom, after successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention, non-culprit lesions were assessed using fractional flow reserve or angiography during the index procedure or during a staged procedure during the initial hospital stay, ≤5 days after the index procedure. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and unplanned hospitalization with urgent revascularization at 1year., Results: Among 1171 patients enrolled in this study, 1119 (96.2%) had complete revascularization performed during a staged procedure, and 44 (3.8%) at the time of primary percutaneous coronary intervention. During follow-up, a primary outcome event occurred in one of the patients (2.3%) with an immediate strategy and in 55 patients (4.9%) with a staged strategy (adjusted hazard ratio 1.44, 95% confidence interval 0.39-12.69; P=0.64)., Conclusions: Staged non-infarct-related artery complete revascularization was the strategy preferred by investigators in practice in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with multivessel disease. This strategy was not superior to immediate revascularization, which, in the context of this trial, was used in a small proportion of patients. Further randomized studies are needed to confirm these observational findings., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Aims: The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) has released three consecutive guidelines within 5 years addressing cardiovascular prevention, risk scores, and cholesterol treatment. This study aims to evaluate whether the 2021 ESC guidelines improved the eligibility of individuals for primary prevention statin therapy before their first ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and for intensive lipid-lowering treatments in secondary prevention., Methods and Results: The cardiovascular risk category of 2757 consecutive individuals admitted for a first STEMI was evaluated to assess whether they would have been eligible for primary prevention statins according to 2021 vs. 2019 and 2016 ESC guidelines. Eligibility for intensive lipid-lowering therapy in secondary prevention was assessed according to the real-life follow-up low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and the expected follow-up LDL-C. More individuals would have been eligible for primary prevention statins according to 2021 and 2019 vs. 2016 guidelines (61.8% vs. 38.7% vs. 23.6%, P &lt; 0.01), a finding observed in both men (62.3% vs. 35.0% vs. 24.9%, P &lt; 0.01) and women (60.2% vs. 50.7% vs. 19.3%, P = 0.18). Only 27% of individuals reached the LDL-C objective of 55 mg/L in secondary prevention: using the ESC stepwise approach, 61.7% were eligible for higher doses of statins, 26.2% for ezetimibe, and 12.1% for a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor (PCSK9i). Based on expected LDL-C reductions, eligibility for a PCSK9i in secondary prevention was greater with 2021 vs. 2016 guidelines (44.5% vs. 22.5%, P &lt; 0.01)., Conclusion: The 2021 ESC guidelines improved the detection and treatment of individuals at risk for a first myocardial infarction. In secondary prevention, 70% of patients kept LDL-C levels above 55 mg/dL: increasing the statin dose and adding ezetimibe were the most frequently recommended therapeutic actions., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who have multivessel disease, the FLOWER-MI trial found no significant clinical benefit to fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared to angiography-guided PCI., Aims: Our aim was to estimate the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of FFR-guided PCI, the secondary endpoint of the FLOWER-MI trial., Methods: Costs, major adverse cardiovascular events (composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction [MI], and unplanned hospitalisation leading to urgent revascularisation), and quality-adjusted life years were calculated in both groups. The incremental cost-effectiveness and cost-utility ratios were estimated. Uncertainty was explored by probabilistic bootstrapping. The analysis was conducted from the perspective of the health care provider with a time horizon of one year., Results: At one year, the average cost per patient was 7,560€ (±2,218) in the FFR-guided group and 7,089€ (±1,991) in the angiography-guided group (p-value<0.01). The point estimates for the incremental cost-effectiveness and cost-utility ratios found that the angiography-guided strategy was cost saving and improved outcomes, with a probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirming dominance., Conclusions: The FFR-guided strategy at one year is unlikely to be cost effective compared to the angiography-guided strategy on both clinical and quality of life outcomes.

Objectives: This study sought to assess the association between postprocedural anticoagulation (PPAC) use and several clinical outcomes., Background: PPAC after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) may prevent recurrent ischemic events but may increase the risk of bleeding. No consensus has been reached on PPAC use., Methods: Using data from the Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-Acute Coronary Syndrome registry, conducted between 2014 and 2019, we stratified all STEMI patients who underwent pPCI according to the use of PPAC or not. Inverse probability of treatment weighting and a Cox proportional hazards model with hospital as random effect were used to analyze differences in in-hospital clinical outcomes: the primary efficacy endpoint was mortality and the primary safety endpoint was major bleeding., Results: Of 34,826 evaluable patients, 26,272 (75.4%) were treated with PPAC and were on average younger, more stable at admission with lower bleeding risk score, more likely to have comorbidities and multivessel disease, and more often treated within 12 hours of symptom onset than those without PPAC. After inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustment for baseline differences, PPAC was associated with significantly reduced risk of in-hospital mortality (0.9% vs 1.8%; HR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.43-0.89; P < 0.001) and a nonsignificant difference in risk of in-hospital major bleeding (2.5% vs 2.2%; HR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.83-1.32; P = 0.14)., Conclusions: PPAC in STEMI patients after pPCI was associated with reduced mortality without increasing major bleeding complications. Dedicated randomized trials with contemporary STEMI management are needed to confirm these findings., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China–Acute Coronary Syndrome project is a collaborative study of the American Heart Association and the Chinese Society of Cardiology. The American Heart Association has been funded by Pfizer and AstraZeneca for quality improvement initiatives through an independent grant. Dr Yan was funded by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82100260), the Fund for Beijing Science and Technology Development of TCM (No. QN2018-01), and the Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Incubating Program (No. PZ2019005). Dr Gong was funded by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 81970292 and 81600213), Beijing Hospitals Authority Youth Program (No. QML20190603), and CS Optimizing Antithrombotic Research Fund (No. BJUHFCSOARF201901-08). Dr Wang was funded by Beijing Nova Program (No. Z201100006820087). Dr Ma has received lecture honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Johnson and Johnson, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, and AstraZeneca. Dr Montalescot has received institutional research grants or consulting/lecture fees from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, CellProthera, Europa, IRIS-Servier, Novartis, Medtronic, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Quantum Genomics, and Sanofi. Dr Nie has received institutional research grants from Boston Scientific, Abbott, Jiangsu Hengrui, China Resources Sanjiu, and Huadong Medicine. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for nonculprit lesions guided by fractional flow reserve (FFR) is superior to treatment of the culprit lesion alone. Whether deferring nonculprit PCI is safe in this specific context is questionable. We aimed to assess clinical outcomes at 1 year in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and an FFR-guided strategy for nonculprit lesions, according to whether or not ≥1 PCI was performed., Methods: Outcomes were analyzed in patients of the randomized FLOWER-MI (Flow Evaluation to Guide Revascularization in Multivessel ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) trial in whom, after successful primary PCI, nonculprit lesions were assessed using FFR. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and unplanned hospitalization with urgent revascularization at 1 year., Results: Among 1171 patients enrolled in this study, 586 were assigned to the FFR-guided group: 388 (66%) of them had ≥1 PCI, and 198 (34%) had no PCI. Mean FFR before decision (ie, PCI or not) of nonculprit lesions was 0.75±0.10 and 0.88±0.06, respectively. During follow-up, a primary outcome event occurred in 16 of 388 patients (4.1%) in patients with PCI and in 16 of 198 patients (8.1%) in patients without PCI (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.20-0.88]; P =0.02)., Conclusions: In patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing complete revascularization guided by FFR measurement, those with ≥1 PCI had lower event rates at 1 year, compared with patients with deferred PCI, suggesting that deferring lesions judged relevant by visual estimation but with FFR >0.80 may not be optimal in this context. Future randomized studies are needed to confirm these data. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02943954. Graphic Abstract: A graphic abstract is available for this article.

Background: In patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who have multivessel disease, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for nonculprit lesions (complete revascularization) is superior to treatment of the culprit lesion alone. However, whether complete revascularization that is guided by fractional flow reserve (FFR) is superior to an angiography-guided procedure is unclear., Methods: In this multicenter trial, we randomly assigned patients with STEMI and multivessel disease who had undergone successful PCI of the infarct-related artery to receive complete revascularization guided by either FFR or angiography. The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or unplanned hospitalization leading to urgent revascularization at 1 year., Results: The mean (±SD) number of stents that were placed per patient for nonculprit lesions was 1.01±0.99 in the FFR-guided group and 1.50±0.86 in the angiography-guided group. During follow-up, a primary outcome event occurred in 32 of 586 patients (5.5%) in the FFR-guided group and in 24 of 577 patients (4.2%) in the angiography-guided group (hazard ratio, 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.78 to 2.23; P = 0.31). Death occurred in 9 patients (1.5%) in the FFR-guided group and in 10 (1.7%) in the angiography-guided group; nonfatal myocardial infarction in 18 (3.1%) and 10 (1.7%), respectively; and unplanned hospitalization leading to urgent revascularization in 15 (2.6%) and 11 (1.9%), respectively., Conclusions: In patients with STEMI undergoing complete revascularization, an FFR-guided strategy did not have a significant benefit over an angiography-guided strategy with respect to the risk of death, myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularization at 1 year. However, given the wide confidence intervals for the estimate of effect, the findings do not allow for a conclusive interpretation. (Funded by the French Ministry of Health and Abbott; FLOWER-MI ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02943954.)., (Copyright © 2021 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Objectives: This study sought to compare the pharmacodynamic effects of pre-hospitally administered P2Y 12 inhibitor prasugrel in crushed versus integral tablet formulation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI)., Background: Early dual antiplatelet therapy is recommended in STEMI patients. Yet, onset of oral P2Y 12 inhibitor effect is delayed and varies according to formulation administered., Methods: The COMPARE CRUSH (Comparison of Pre-hospital Crushed Versus Uncrushed Prasugrel Tablets in Patients With STEMI Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Interventions) trial randomized patients with suspected STEMI to crushed or integral prasugrel 60-mg loading dose in the ambulance. Pharmacodynamic measurements were performed at 4 time points: before antiplatelet treatment, at the beginning and end of pPCI, and 4 h after study treatment onset. The primary endpoint was high platelet reactivity at the end of pPCI. The secondary endpoint was impact of platelet reactivity status on markers of coronary reperfusion., Results: A total of 441 patients were included. In patients with crushed prasugrel, the occurrence of high platelet reactivity at the end of pPCI was reduced by almost one-half (crushed 34.7% vs. uncrushed 61.6%; odds ratio [OR] = 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.22 to 0.50; p < 0.01). Platelet reactivity <150 P2Y 12 reactivity units at the beginning of coronary angiography correlated with improved Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow grade 3 in the infarct artery pre-pPCI (OR: 1.78; 95% CI: 1.08 to 2.94; p = 0.02) but not ST-segment resolution (OR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.48 to 1.34; p = 0.40)., Conclusions: Oral administration of crushed compared with integral prasugrel significantly improves platelet inhibition during the acute phase in STEMI patients undergoing pPCI. However, a considerable number of patients still exhibit inadequate platelet inhibition at the end of pPCI, suggesting the need for alternative agents to bridge the gap in platelet inhibition., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The COMPARE CRUSH trial was funded by Maasstad Research B.V. (Rotterdam, the Netherlands), which received unrestricted grants from Daiichi-Sankyo and Shanghai MicroPort Medical. The funding companies were not involved in the conduct of the trial, the analysis of the data, or the drafts of the manuscripts. Dr. Angiolillo has received consulting fees or honoraria from Abbott, Amgen, Aralez, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biosensors, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chiesi, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Haemonetics, Janssen, Merck, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Pfizer, Sanofi, and The Medicines Company; has received payments for participation in review activities from CeloNova and St. Jude Medical; and has received institutional research grants from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biosensors, CeloNova, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Idorsia, Janssen, Matsutani Chemical Industry Co., Merck, Novartis, Osprey Medical, Renal Guard Solutions, and the Scott R. MacKenzie Foundation. Dr. Alexopoulos has received consulting fees or honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi Hellas, Medtronic, and Pfizer. Dr. Montalescot has received research or institutional grant support or consulting/lecture fees from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, CellProthera, Europa, IRIS-Servier, Novartis, Medtronic, MSD, Pfizer, Quantum Genomics, and Sanofi. Dr. Van Mieghem has received institutional research grant support from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Teleflex, PulseCath BV, and Daiichi-Sankyo. Dr. Smits has received research grant support from Daiichi-Sankyo and Shanghai MicroPort. Dr. Vlachojannis has received consulting fees from AstraZeneca; and research grant support from Daiichi-Sankyo and Shanghai MicroPort. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with multivessel disease (MVD) are associated with a worse prognosis. However, few comparisons are available according to coronary status in the era of modern reperfusion and optimized secondary prevention., Hypothesis: We hypothesized that the difference in prognosis according to number of vessel disease in STEMI patients has reduced., Methods: All consecutive STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within 24 h of symptoms onset between January 1, 2014 and June 30, 2016 enrolled in the CRAC (Club Régional des Angioplasticiens de la région Centre) France PCI registry were analyzed. Baseline characteristics, management, and outcomes at 1-year were analyzed according to coronary status (one-, two-, and three-VD)., Results: A total of 1886 patients (mean age 62.2 ± 14.0 year; 74% of male) were included. Patients with MVD (two or three-VD) represented 53.7%. They were older with higher cardiovascular risk factor profile. At 1 year, the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, defined as all-cause death, stroke or re-MI) was 10%, 12%, and 12% in one-, two, and three-VD respectively (p = .28). In multivariable adjusted Cox proportional hazard regression model, two- and three-VD were not associated with higher rate of MACE compared to patients with single VD (HR, 1.09; 95%CI 0.76-1.56 for two-VD; HR, 0.74; 95%CI 0.48-1.14 for three-VD)., Conclusions: MVD still represents an important proportion of STEMI patients but their prognoses were not associated with worse clinical outcomes at 1-year compared with one-VD patients in a modern reperfusion area and secondary medication prevention., (© 2021 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Early treatment with a potent oral platelet P2Y 12 inhibitor is recommended in patients presenting with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction scheduled to undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). The impact on coronary reperfusion of crushed P2Y 12 inhibitor tablets, which lead to more prompt and potent platelet inhibition, is unknown., Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled, multicenter trial in the Netherlands, enrolling patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction scheduled to undergo pPCI. Patients were randomly allocated to receive in the ambulance, before transfer, a 60-mg loading dose of prasugrel either as crushed or integral tablets. The independent primary end points were thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 3 flow in the infarct-related artery at initial coronary angiography, and complete (≥70%) ST-segment resolution 1 hour after pPCI. The safety end points were TIMI major and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium ≥3 bleedings. Secondary end points included platelet reactivity and ischemic outcomes., Results: A total of 727 patients were assigned to either crushed or integral tablets of prasugrel loading dose. The median time from study treatment to wire-crossing during pPCI was 57 (47-70) minutes. The primary end point TIMI 3 flow in the infarct-related artery before pPCI occurred in 31.0% in the crushed group versus 32.7% in the integral group (odds ratio, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.65-1.30], P =0.64). Complete ST-segment resolution 1 hour after pPCI was present in 59.9% in the crushed group versus 57.3% in the integral group (odds ratio, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.78-1.58], P =0.55). Platelet reactivity at the beginning of pPCI, measured as P2Y 12 reactivity unit, differed significantly between groups (crushed, 192 [132-245] versus integral, 227 [184-254], P ≤0.01). TIMI major and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium ≥3 bleeding occurred in 0% in the crushed group versus 0.8% in the integral group, and in 0.3% in the crushed group versus 1.1% in the integral group, respectively. There were no differences observed between groups regarding ischemic events at 30 days., Conclusions: Prehospital administration of crushed prasugrel tablets does not improve TIMI 3 flow in the infarct-related artery before pPCI or complete ST-segment resolution 1 h after pPCI in patients presenting with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction scheduled for pPCI. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03296540.

Background: Current guidelines recommend anticoagulation therapy during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, whether anticoagulation should be continued after pPCI has not been well investigated., Methods/design: The RIGHT trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in STEMI patients treated with pPCI evaluating the prolongation of anticoagulation after the procedure. Patients are randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive either prolonged anticoagulant or matching placebo (no anticoagulation) for at least 48 hours after the procedure. When randomized to anticoagulation prolongation, the patient is assigned to intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) or subcutaneous enoxaparin or intravenous bivalirudin (same drug and same regimen at each center). The primary efficacy endpoint is the composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, stent thrombosis (definite) or urgent revascularization (any vessel) at 30 days. The primary safety endpoint is major bleeding (BARC 3-5) at 30 days. Based on a superiority design and assuming a 35% relative risk reduction (from 7% to 4.5%), 2856 patients will be enrolled, accounting for a 5% drop-out rate (α = 0.05 and power = 80%)., Conclusion: The RIGHT trial tests the hypothesis that post-procedural anticoagulation is superior to no anticoagulation in reducing ischemic events in STEMI patients undergoing pPCI., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Dual antiplatelet therapy constitutes the cornerstone of medical treatment in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, oral antiplatelet agents, such as prasugrel or ticagrelor, are characterized by slow gastrointestinal drug absorption in the acute phase of STEMI, leading to decreased bioavailability and therefore delayed onset of platelet inhibition. Evidence suggests that administration of crushed tablets of the P2Y 12 inhibitor prasugrel improves drug absorption and achieves earlier antiplatelet effects in STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the clinical implications of these pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic findings are unknown., Hypothesis: The present study is designed to test the hypothesis that patients presenting with STEMI planned for primary PCI will have improved markers of optimal reperfusion and clinical outcomes by prehospital administration of crushed tablets of prasugrel loading dose., Study Design: COMPARE CRUSH (NCT03296540) is a randomized trial in a regionally organized ambulance care setting evaluating the efficacy and safety of pre-hospital loading dose with prasugrel crushed tablets versus integral tablets in approximately 674 patients presenting with STEMI planned for primary PCI. The independent primary endpoints are percentage of patients reaching thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade 3 in the infarct-related artery at initial angiography, or achieving ≥70% ST-segment elevation resolution at 1 hour post-PCI. Secondary clinical endpoints are death, myocardial infarction, revascularization, and stent thrombosis followed up to 1 year. Moreover, the primary safety endpoint is bleeding events assessed at 48 hours., Conclusions: The COMPARE CRUSH trial will assess whether prehospital administration of loading dose prasugrel in form of crushed tablets - which is expected to provide faster platelet inhibition compared to standard treatment with integral tablets - results in improved reperfusion and clinical outcomes. RCT# NCT03296540., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients presenting with multivessel disease (MVD), recent studies have demonstrated the superiority of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for non-culprit lesions compared to culprit lesion treatment-only therapy. FFR- and angio-guided PCI have however never been compared in STEMI patients., Trial Design: FLOWER-MI is an open-label multicenter national randomized clinical trial. The aim is to investigate FFR-guided complete revascularization in comparison to angio-guided complete revascularization in STEMI patients with successful PCI of the culprit lesion and ≥50% stenosis in at least one additional non-culprit lesion requiring PCI. Eligible patients will be randomized after successful primary PCI in a 1:1 fashion to either FFR-guided or angio-guided complete revascularization during the index procedure or a staged procedure before discharge (≤5 days). Patients assigned to FFR guidance first have FFR measured in each non-culprit vessel and only undergo PCI if FFR is ≤0.80. The primary end point of the study is a composite of major adverse cardiac events, including all-cause death, non-fatal MI, and unplanned hospitalization leading to urgent revascularization at 1 year. Secondary end points will include the individual adverse events, cost-effectiveness, quality of life, and 30-day, 6-month, and 3-year outcomes. Based on estimated event rates, a sample size of 1170 patients is needed to show superiority of the FFR-guided revascularization with 80% power., Conclusion: The aim of FLOWER-MI trial is to assess whether FFR-guided complete revascularization in the acute setting is superior angio-guided complete revascularization., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate prospectively the clinical impact of routine transmission of CYP2C19 genotype in the management of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with primary percutaneous coronary intervention., Background: Response to clopidogrel differs widely among patients, notably because of CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms., Methods: CYP2C19 genotype (6 alleles) was determined centrally and communicated within 4.1 ± 1.9 days of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in 1,445 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction recruited at 57 centers in France. CYP2C19 metabolic status was predicted from genotype and served to adjust thienopyridine treatment. The primary endpoint was differences in 12-month outcomes (death, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis) between patients with the wild-type genotype or gain-of-function allele (class 1, n = 1,118) and those with loss-of-function (LOF) alleles (class 2, n = 272) who received optimized thienopyridine treatment., Results: Detection of LOF alleles resulted in adjustment of P2Y 12 inhibition in 85% of patients, with significantly higher use of prasugrel or double-dose clopidogrel. The primary endpoint did not differ between class 1 and class 2 patients (3.31% vs. 3.04%, respectively; p = 0.82). In contrast, carriers of LOF alleles without treatment adjustment had significantly worse outcomes (15.6%; p < 0.05). Bleeding rates were not different between groups., Conclusions: In a real-world setting, a complete CYPC2C19 genotype can be mostly determined in <7 days using analysis of saliva deoxyribonucleic acid collected during the in-hospital phase among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Genotype information led to stronger platelet inhibition treatment in the vast majority of LOF allele carriers and to similar clinical outcomes as in patients carrying the wild-type genotype or gain-of-function allele. (Genotyping Infarct Patients to Adjust and Normalize Thienopyridine Treatment [GIANT]; NCT01134380)., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study sought to analyze the impact of the preprocedural thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow on clinical outcome in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)., Background: Previous studies have shown that the TIMI flow 0/1 prior to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with a poor clinical outcome. However, it is unclear whether the same is true in patients with ongoing STEMI of less than 6 hr duration, rapid reperfusion, and modern guideline-adherent therapy., Methods: The ATLANTIC study compared prehospital versus inhospital treatment with ticagrelor in patients with acute STEMI. For this analysis, patients were divided into three groups according to the preprocedural TIMI flow grade of the infarct vessel: TIMI 0/1, TIMI 2, and TIMI 3., Results: From a total of 1,680 patients, 1,113 had TIMI 0/1, 279 TIMI 2, and 288 TIMI 3 flow before primary PCI. At 30 days, the composite ischemic endpoint (5.5, 2.9, and 2.1%, p < .05) and all-cause death (3.0, 1.4, and 2.1%, p = .30) were highest in patients with TIMI flow 0/1. After adjustment, preprocedural TIMI flow <3 (versus 3) was not an independent predictor of major adverse ischemic events within 30 days (odds ratio 1.89, 95% confidence interval 0.74-4.85). However, definite stent thrombosis occurred only in patients with initial TIMI flow 0/1 (1.0%). Among these patients, those with prehospital administration of ticagrelor were less often affected (0.3% vs. 1.3%, p < .05)., Conclusion: In this post-hoc analysis, preprocedural TIMI flow was not independently associated with a higher rate of adverse ischemic events., (© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background:  Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPIs) in combination with clopidogrel improve clinical outcome in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI); however, finding a balance that minimizes both thrombotic and bleeding risk remains fundamental. The efficacy and safety of GPI in addition to ticagrelor, a more potent P2Y12-inhibitor, have not been fully investigated., Methods:  1,630 STEMI patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were analyzed in this subanalysis of the ATLANTIC trial. Patients were divided in three groups: no GPI, GPI administration routinely before primary PCI, and GPI administration in bailout situations. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, urgent target revascularization, and definite stent thrombosis at 30 days. The safety outcome was non-coronary artery bypass graft (CABG)-related PLATO major bleeding at 30 days., Results:  Compared with no GPI ( n  = 930), routine GPI ( n  = 525) or bailout GPI ( n  = 175) was not associated with an improved primary efficacy outcome (4.2% no GPI vs. 4.0% routine GPI vs. 6.9% bailout GPI; p  = 0.58). After multivariate analysis, the use of GPI in bailout situations was associated with a higher incidence of non-CABG-related bleeding compared with no GPI (odds ratio [OR] 2.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.32-6.64; p  = 0.03). However, routine GPI use compared with no GPI was not associated with a significant increase in bleeding (OR 1.78, 95% CI 0.88-3.61; p  = 0.92)., Conclusion:  Use of GPIs in addition to ticagrelor in STEMI patients was not associated with an improvement in 30-day ischemic outcome. A significant increase in 30-day non-CABG-related PLATO major bleeding was seen in patients who received GPIs in a bailout situation., Competing Interests: A.W.J.v.‘t H. reports institutional fees and nonfinancial support from AstraZeneca and grants from Medtronic. C.W.H. reports institutional fees and personal fees from AstraZeneca. R.F.S. reports institutional research grants from AstraZeneca and PlaqueTec; consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, Avacta, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Haemonetics, Idorsia, Novartis, PlaqueTec, and Thromboserin; and honoraria from AstraZeneca and Bayer. J.F.L. reports unrestricted grants from Medtronic, Abbott, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, and Terumo. A.C. reports institutional research grants from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Cordis, Medtronic, and Orbus Neich, and consulting/lecture fees from Abbott Vascular, AstraZeneca, Biotronik, Ferrer International, Medtronic, and Terumo. U.Z. reports grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca during the conduct of the study, personal fees from Bayer, grants and personal fees from BMS, grants and personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Medicines Company, personal fees from Sanofi, grants and personal fees from Novartis, outside the submitted work. M.J. reports lecture fees from AstraZeneca and Pfizer. K.H. reports lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi Aventis, and the Medicines Company. J.S. reports the following disclosures during the past two years: Consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, CSL Behring, Gilead Science, and Sanofi-Aventis; Speaker honorariums from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Bayer, Algorythm, and Sanofi-Aventis; and travel supports form Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, and Bristol-Myer Squibb. S.G.G. has received research grant support and/or speaker/consulting honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bayer Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Fenix Group Internation, and Sanofi. L.B. reports lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, and Sanofi Aventis., (Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Objectives: The authors sought to assess the association between admission time with patient's care, procedure characteristics, and clinical outcomes within a contemporary ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) network of patients referred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)., Background: The effect of admission time on STEMI patient's outcomes remains controversial when primary PCI is the preferred reperfusion strategy., Methods: Characteristics and clinical outcomes of 2,167 consecutive STEMI patients admitted in a tertiary PCI-capable center were collected. On-hours were defined as admission from Monday through Friday between 8 am and 6 pm and off-hours as admission during night shift, weekend, and nonworking holidays. In-hospital and 1-year all-cause mortality were assessed as well as key time delays., Results: A total of 1,048 patients (48.3%) were admitted during on-hours, and 1,119 patients (51.7%) during off-hours. Characteristics were well-balanced between the 2 groups, including rates of cardiac arrest (7.9% vs. 8.8%; p = 0.55) and cardiogenic shock (12.3% vs. 14.7%; p = 0.16). Median symptom-to-first medical contact time and median first medical contact-to-sheath insertion time did not differ according to on- versus off-hours admission (120 min vs. 126 min; p = 0.25 and 90 min vs. 93 min; p = 0.58, respectively), as well as the rate of radial access for catheterization (85.6% vs. 87.5%; p = 0.27). There was no association between on- versus off-hours groups and in-hospital (8.1% vs. 7.0%; p = 0.49) or 1-year mortality (11.0% vs. 11.1%; p = 0.89), respectively., Conclusions: In a contemporary organized STEMI network, patients admitted in a high-volume tertiary primary PCI center during on-hours or off-hours had similar management and 1-year outcomes., (Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: We investigated, in the contemporary era of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treatment, the influence of diabetes mellitus (DM) on cardiovascular outcomes, and whether pre-hospital administration of ticagrelor may affect these outcomes in a subgroup of STEMI patients with DM., Background: DM patients have high platelet reactivity and a prothrombotic condition which highlight the importance of an effective antithrombotic regimen in this high-risk population., Methods: In toal 1,630 STEMI patients enrolled in the ATLANTIC trial who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were included. Multivariate analysis was used to explore the association of DM with outcomes and potential treatment-by-diabetes interaction was tested., Results: A total of 214/1,630 (13.1%) patients had DM. DM was an independent predictor of poor myocardial reperfusion as reflected by less frequent ST-segment elevation resolution (≥70%) after PCI (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.43-0.82, P < 0.01) and was an independent predictor of the composite 30-day outcomes of death/new myocardial infarction (MI)/urgent revascularization/definite stent thrombosis (ST) (OR 2.80, 95% CI 1.62-4.85, P < 0.01), new MI or definite acute ST (OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.08-5.61, P = 0.03), and definite ST (OR 10.00, 95% CI 3.54-28.22, P < 0.01). No significant interaction between pre-hospital ticagrelor vs in-hospital ticagrelor administration and DM was present for the clinical, electrocardiographic and angiographic outcomes as well as for thrombolysis in myocardial infarction major bleeding., Conclusions: DM remains independently associated with poor myocardial reperfusion and worse 30-day clinical outcomes. No significant interaction was found between pre-hospital vs in-hospital ticagrelor administration and DM status. Further approaches for the treatment of DM patients are needed., Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01347580., (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Large registries and epidemiologic studies have demonstrated that elderly patients (≥ 75 years old) represent a growing proportion of the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) population and are exposed to a high risk of both bleeding and ischemic events. In this setting, most of the randomized trials excluded elderly patients while evaluating therapeutic strategies in ACS and only few trials specifically dedicated their design to the elderly population, leading to a paucity of data. Elderly patients are less likely to be treated with an invasive strategy or potent antithrombotic drugs compared with younger patients, while they are exposed to a greater risk of mortality. Nevertheless, the benefit of an invasive approach in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been consistently demonstrated in non-dedicated large percutaneous coronary intervention randomized trials, regardless of the patient's age. European clinical practice guidelines recommend that STEMI in elderly patients should not be treated differently than in younger patients. However, the therapeutic decision should be based on a combined evaluation of both (1) the patient's frailty, including functional or cognitive impairment, and (2) the balance between bleeding and ischemic risks. This review outlines the evidence on the optimal reperfusion and antithrombotic strategies among STEMI elderly patients, suggesting a patient-centered approach to apprehend the balanced therapeutic decision in the very old patient.

Background: In the ATLANTIC (Administration of Ticagrelor in the catheterization laboratory or in the Ambulance for New ST elevation myocardial Infarction to open the Coronary artery) trial the early use of aspirin, anticoagulation, and ticagrelor coupled with very short medical contact-to-balloon times represent good indicators of optimal treatment of ST-elevation myocardial infarction and an ideal setting to explore which factors may influence coronary reperfusion beyond a well-established pre-hospital system., Methods: This study sought to evaluate predictors of complete ST-segment resolution after percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients enrolled in the ATLANTIC trial. ST-segment analysis was performed on electrocardiograms recorded at the time of inclusion (pre-hospital electrocardiogram), and one hour after percutaneous coronary intervention (post-percutaneous coronary intervention electrocardiogram) by an independent core laboratory. Complete ST-segment resolution was defined as ≥70% ST-segment resolution., Results: Complete ST-segment resolution occurred post-percutaneous coronary intervention in 54.9% ( n=800/1456) of patients and predicted lower 30-day composite major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (odds ratio 0.35, 95% confidence interval 0.19-0.65; p<0.01), definite stent thrombosis (odds ratio 0.18, 95% confidence interval 0.02-0.88; p=0.03), and total mortality (odds ratio 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.19-0.97; p=0.04). In multivariate analysis, independent negative predictors of complete ST-segment resolution were the time from symptoms to pre-hospital electrocardiogram (odds ratio 0.91, 95% confidence interval 0.85-0.98; p<0.01) and diabetes mellitus (odds ratio 0.6, 95% confidence interval 0.44-0.83; p<0.01); pre-hospital ticagrelor treatment showed a favorable trend for complete ST-segment resolution (odds ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval 0.99-1.51; p=0.06)., Conclusions: This study confirmed that post-percutaneous coronary intervention complete ST-segment resolution is a valid surrogate marker for cardiovascular clinical outcomes. In the current era of ST-elevation myocardial infarction reperfusion, patients' delay and diabetes mellitus are independent predictors of poor reperfusion and need specific attention in the future.

Background: Morphine adversely impacts the action of oral adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-receptor blockers in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, and is possibly associated with differing patient characteristics. This retrospective analysis investigated whether interaction between morphine use and pre-percutaneous coronary intervention (pre-PCI) ST-segment elevation resolution in STEMI patients in the ATLANTIC study was associated with differences in patient characteristics and management., Methods: ATLANTIC was an international, multicenter, randomized study of treatment in the acute ambulance/hospital setting where STEMI patients received ticagrelor 180 mg ± morphine. Patient characteristics, cardiovascular history, risk factors, management, and outcomes were recorded., Results: Opioids (97.6% morphine) were used in 921 out of 1862 patients (49.5%). There were no significant differences in age, sex or cardiovascular history, but more morphine-treated patients had anterior myocardial infarction and left-main disease. Time from chest pain to electrocardiogram and ticagrelor loading was shorter with morphine (both p = 0.01) but not total ischemic time. Morphine-treated patients more frequently received glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (p = 0.002), thromboaspiration and stent implantation (both p < 0.001). No significant difference between the two groups was found regarding pre-PCI ≥ 70% ST-segment elevation resolution, death, myocardial infarction, stroke, urgent revascularization and definitive acute stent thrombosis. More morphine-treated patients had an absence of pre-PCI Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 3 flow (85.8% vs. 79.7%; p = 0.001) and more had TIMI major bleeding (1.1% vs. 0.1%; p = 0.02)., Conclusions: Morphine-treatment was associated with increased GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor use, less pre-PCI TIMI 3 flow, and more bleeding. Judicious morphine use is advised with non-opioid analgesics preferred for non-severe acute pain., Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01347580.

Background: Two biomarkers of early acute kidney injury-plasmatic neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and cystatin C-are not used in routine clinical practice in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) because of a lack of supporting data., Aims: To evaluate the predictive value of NGAL and cystatin C regarding the incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) and clinical outcomes after STEMI in patients treated by primary PCI., Methods: Plasmatic NGAL and cystatin C were measured on admission, before any contrast exposure, in 701 unselected patients with STEMI. Associations between biomarker concentrations and incidence of CI-AKI (assessed at 48h), haemodialysis requirement at 1 year and all-cause mortality at 1 year were assessed by logistic regression analyses and receiver operating characteristic area under the curve analysis (c-statistic). Discrimination performance comparison was performed using the DeLong test., Results: NGAL and cystatin C had mild discrimination regarding CI-AKI, with c-statistics of 0.60 (P=0.001) and 0.60 (P=0.002), respectively. Combining NGAL and cystatin C did not improve their discrimination (c-statistic 0.61; P=0.001). There was no significant difference in discrimination between NGAL, cystatin C and baseline creatinine (P=0.57). Regression analyses showed no independent association between NGAL and CI-AKI, haemodialysis or 1-year mortality. Similarly, cystatin C was not associated with these clinical outcomes., Conclusions: In this cohort of patients with STEMI treated by primary PCI, plasmatic NGAL and cystatin C did not provide additional value regarding CI-AKI prediction compared with known risk factors such as baseline creatinine., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Background: Copeptin - the C-terminal section of vasopressin precursor - is a novel biomarker, that has been shown to be a useful prognostic factor in heart failure, ischemic stroke and in acute myocardial infarction (MI) but with restricted population and follow-up in ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) setting. We evaluated in this study the hypothesis that copeptin measured on admission is an independent predictor of one-year all-cause mortality after a STEMI., Methods: Copeptin was measured immediately on arrival in the catheterization laboratory in a cohort of unselected STEMI patients and was compared to the peak of cardiac troponin I as a prognosis marker. One-year follow-up was performed., Results: We included 401 STEMI patients (77% of men, mean age 64 ± 14 years) treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Copeptin on admission was significantly higher in patients who died during the one-year follow-up than in survivors (154.8 pmol/L; IQR [63.9-304.8] vs 30.3 pmol/L; IQR [10.8-93.5]); p < 0.0001). There was an increase in mortality at one year from the lowest to the highest quartile of copeptin. After Cox regression analysis, copeptin was an independent predictor of death at one year (adjHR 3.1, 95% CI [1.5-6.2], p = 0.001). When compared to the peak value of cardiac troponin I, copeptin measured on admission had a better prognostic value to predict one-year mortality (AUC of 0.74 vs 0.60, p = 0.022)., Conclusion: Copeptin measured on admission is a reliable and independent prognostic biomarker of one-year mortality in acute myocardial infarction patients., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Serum cholesterol efflux capacity, a biomarker that integrates contributors and modulators of the initial step of the reverse cholesterol transport, has been associated with atherosclerosis independently of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level., Objectives: The authors evaluated the prognostic impact of serum cholesterol efflux capacity on mortality in a large cohort of patients hospitalized for an acute myocardial infarction (MI)., Methods: Serum cholesterol efflux capacity, cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) activity, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglyceride levels were measured in 1,609 consecutive patients admitted with an acute MI. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality evaluated at 6 years with a median follow-up of 1.9 years (interquartile range: 1.5 to 4.2 years). An analysis by quartile of serum cholesterol efflux capacity was also performed., Results: In a fully adjusted model that included age, sex, traditional cardiovascular risk factors including lipid levels, and prognostic factors of MI, serum cholesterol efflux capacity was a strong predictor of survival (adjusted hazard ratio for mortality per 1-SD increase in serum cholesterol efflux capacity, 0.79; 95% confidence interval: 0.66 to 0.95; p = 0.0132). Patients displaying an elevated serum cholesterol efflux capacity had a marked lower rate of mortality at 6 years (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.54 [0.32 to 0.89]; p = 0.0165) as compared with patients with reduced serum cholesterol efflux capacity., Conclusions: Serum cholesterol efflux capacity, an integrative marker of reverse cholesterol transport pathway and efficacy, was inversely associated with all-cause mortality in MI patients independently of HDL cholesterol level and other risk factors., (Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The aim was to compare the peri-procedural biomarkers of coagulation and platelet activation in patients randomly allocated to intravenous enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin (UFH) in the ATOLL randomized trial (NCT00718471)., Methods and Results: A total of 129 patients (n = 58 enoxaparin and n = 71 UFH) admitted for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were included in this substudy of the ATOLL trial. Activated partial thromboplastin time ratio, anti-Xa activity, von Willebrand factor antigen, prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (F1 + 2), thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT), tissue factor pathway inhibitor and soluble CD40 ligand were measured at sheath insertion (T1) and at the end of the PCI (T2) and correlated with 1-month clinical outcomes. Target anticoagulation levels at T2 were more readily achieved in patients receiving enoxaparin compared to those receiving UFH (80.3 vs 18.2%, p < 0.0001). Increased levels of F1 + 2 and TAT measured at T2 were associated with the incidence of the composite ischemic endpoint (p = 0.04 and p = 0.03) and all-cause mortality (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.002). Release of F1 + 2 between T1 and T2 also predicted the composite ischemic endpoint (312 ± 513 vs 37 ± 292, p = 0.04) and net clinical outcome (185 ± 405 vs 3.2 ± 278, p = 0.03)., Conclusions: During primary PCI, enoxaparin achieved therapeutic levels more frequently than UFH. Higher level of thrombin generation measured at the end of the PCI procedure was associated with more frequent ischemic events.

Background: Two recent randomised trials studied the benefit of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) irrespective or in absence of heart failure. The studies were both undersized to assess hard clinical endpoints. A pooled analysis was preplanned by the steering committees., Methods: We conducted a prespecified meta-analysis of patient-level data of patients with STEMI recruited in two multicentre superiority trials, randomised within 72 hours after symptom onset. Patients were allocated (1:1) to two MRA regimens: (1) an intravenous bolus of potassium canrenoate (200 mg) followed by oral spironolactone (25 mg once daily) versus standard therapy or (2) oral eplerenone (25-50 mg) versus placebo. The primary and key secondary outcomes, all-cause death and the composite of all-cause death or resuscitated sudden death, respectively, were assessed in the intention-to-treat population using a Cox model stratified on the study identifier., Results: Patients were randomly assigned to receive (n=1118) or not the MRA regimen (n=1123). After a median follow-up time of 188 days, the primary and secondary outcomes occurred in 5 (0.4%) and 17 (1.5%) patients (adjusted HR (adjHR) 0.31, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.86, p=0.03) and 6 (0.5%) and 22 (2%) patients (adjHR 0.26, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.65, p=0.004) in the MRA and control groups, respectively. There were also trends towards lower rates of cardiovascular death (p=0.06) and ventricular fibrillation (p=0.08) in the MRA group., Conclusion: Our analysis suggests that compared with standard therapy, MRA regimens are associated with a reduction of death and death or resuscitated sudden death in STEMI., Competing Interests: Competing interests: FB has received institutional grants and/or lecture or consultancy honoraria from AstraZeneca, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Biosensor and Acist. CWH has received speaker fees from Pfizer. GM declares his competing interests on http://action-coeur.org/declarations-dinterets/., (© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.)

Aims: The aim of the study was to examine the main results of the ATLANTIC trial in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), randomised to pre- versus in-hospital ticagrelor, according to age., Methods and Results: Patients were evaluated by age class (<75 vs. ≥75 years) for demographics, prior cardiovascular history, risk factors, management, and outcomes. Elderly patients (≥75 years; 304/1,862) were more likely to be women, diabetic, lean, with a prior history of myocardial infarction and CABG, and with comorbidities (p<0.01 for all). Elderly patients presented more frequently with acute heart failure and less frequently had thromboaspiration, a stent implanted (p<0.01) and an aggressive antithrombotic regimen. Elderly patients had lower rates of pre- and post-PCI ≥70% ST-segment elevation resolution (43.9% vs. 51.6%; p=0.035), of pre- and post-PCI TIMI 3 flow (17.1% vs. 27.5%, p=0.0002), and a higher rate of the composite of death/MI/stroke/urgent revascularisation (9.9% vs. 2.9%; OR 3.67, 95% CI [2.27; 5.93], p<0.0001) and mortality (8.5% vs. 1.5%; OR 6.45, 95% CI [2.75; 15.11], p<0.0001). There was a non-significant trend towards more frequent major bleedings among elderly patients (TIMI major 2.3% vs. 1.1%; OR 2.13, 95% CI [0.88; 5.18], p=0.095). There was no significant interaction between time of ticagrelor administration (pre-hospital versus in-lab) and class of age for all outcomes., Conclusions: Elderly patients, who represented one sixth of the patients randomised in the ATLANTIC trial, had less successful mechanical reperfusion and a sixfold increase in mortality at 30 days, probably due to comorbidities and possible undertreatment. The effect of early ticagrelor was consistent irrespective of age.

Background The optimal timing of administration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients is debated. Clinical trials have failed to demonstrate the superiority of pretreatment with P2Y12 inhibitors in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, but they were not designed to assess hard clinical end points. We used data from the FAST-MI (French Registry on Acute ST-Segment-Elevation or Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) cohorts to determine 1-year survival and in-hospital outcomes in patients receiving DAPT, comparing prehospital versus in-hospital administration. Methods and Results The FAST-MI program collects extensive data on patients admitted in France for acute myocardial infarction over a 1-month period every 5 years since 2005. For the present analysis, 3548 patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction ≤12 hours from symptom onset, transported by physician-staffed emergency medical system ambulances, not treated with intravenous fibrinolysis, and receiving DAPT were included, of whom 44% received DAPT in the ambulance. The primary end point was 1-year survival as assessed by multivariate Cox analysis and propensity score analysis. In-hospital bleeding and ischemic complications were also analyzed. Adjusted in-hospital mortality was numerically but not significantly lower in patients with prehospital DAPT. There were no differences in in-hospital bleeding complications. Fully-adjusted hazard ratio for 1-year death in patients with prehospital versus in-hospital DAPT was 0.69 (95% CI, 0.51-0.92; P=0.011), and propensity score-adjusted hazard ratio was 0.55 (95% CI, 0.41-0.73; P=0.001) in the whole population. In the propensity score-matched cohorts (360 patients each), 1-year survival was 93.9% in patients with prehospital versus 90.3% in those with in-hospital DAPT (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.36-1.05; P=0.077). Results were consistent in subgroups, including by year of survey, age, presence of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, morphine use, and type of P2Y12 inhibitor used. Conclusions In these cohorts of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients considered for primary percutaneous coronary intervention, prehospital administration of DAPT was associated with higher 1-year survival and no increase in in-hospital bleeding complications. The magnitude of the decrease in 1-year mortality, however, may suggest the persistence of some degree of residual confounding. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifiers: NCT00673036, NCT01237418, and NCT02566200.

Aims: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the benefit of "early" vs. "delayed" P2Y12 inhibition in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)., Methods and Results: We conducted a meta-analysis including seven randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which compared early vs. delayed P2Y12inhibition in STEMI patients scheduled for PCI, providing data on major adverse cardiac events (MACE), all-cause death, and major bleeding. The primary endpoint was MACE. Secondary endpoints included stent thrombosis and the use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI). All endpoints were analysed at the shortest follow-up available. A total of 9,648 patients were included ("early"=4,792, "delayed"=4,856). "Early" P2Y12 inhibition was associated with a significant reduction in MACE rate (OR 0.73, 95% CI: 0.61-0.88, p=0.0008), myocardial infarction (OR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.57-0.90, p=0.004), bail-out GPI use (OR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.75-1.00, p=0.04) and improved coronary reperfusion before PCI (OR for Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] flow grade 2-3=1.12, 95% CI: 1.00-1.26, p=0.04). Major bleeding was not increased (OR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.62-1.21, p=0.41)., Conclusions: A strategy of early effective P2Y12 inhibition in PCI of STEMI appears to improve coronary reperfusion before PCI, and reduce MACE, MI and bail-out GPI use without increase of major bleeding.

Objectives: Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is a common and potentially severe complication in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). There is no consensus on the best definition of CI-AKI to identify patients at risk of haemodialysis or death. The objective of this study was to assess the association of CI-AKI, using four definitions, on inhospital mortality, mortality or haemodialysis requirement over 1-year follow-up, in patients with STEMI treated with pPCI., Methods: In this prospective, observational study, all patients with STEMI referred for pPCI were included. We identified independent variables associated with CI-AKI and mortality., Results: We included 1114 consecutive patients with STEMI treated by pPCI. CI-AKI occurred in 18.3%, 12.2%, 15.6% and 10.5% of patients according to the CIN, Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN), Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of kidney function, and End-stage kidney disease (RIFLE) Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and RIFLE Chronic Kidney Disease - Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) definitions, respectively. The RIFLE (CKD-EPI) definition was the most discriminant definition to identify patients at higher risk of inhospital mortality (27.1% vs 4.0%; adjusted OR 2.7 (95% CI 1.4 to 5.1), p=0.003), 1-year mortality (27.4% vs 6.6%; adjusted OR 2.8 (95% CI 1.5 to 5.3), p=0.002) and haemodialysis requirement at 1-year follow-up (15.6% vs 2.7%; adjusted OR 6.7 (95% CI 3.3 to 13.6), p=0.001). Haemodynamic instability, cardiac arrest, preexisting renal failure, elderly age and a high contrast media volume were independently associated with 1-year mortality. Of interest, contrast-media volume was not correlated to increase of creatininaemia (r=0.06) or decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (r=0.05) after percutaneous coronary intervention in our population., Conclusions: CI-AKI is a frequent and serious complication of STEMI treated by pPCI. The RIFLE definition is the most accurate definition to identify patients with CI-AKI at high risk of mortality or haemodialysis., Competing Interests: Competing interests: JS has received research grants, honorarium or travel support from Actelion, Amed, Amgen, Algorythm, Astra-Zeneca, Bayer, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Fondation de France, Gilead Science, IrokoCardio, Sanofi-Aventis and Saint-Jude Medical. LSN has received research grants from Fédération Française de Cardiologie and Société Française de Cardiologie. MK has received research grants from Sanofi, Fédération Française de Cardiologie, Société Française de Cardiologie, and lectures and consulting fees for ESC, AstraZeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo and Bayer. PG has received research grants from Fédération Française de Cardiologie. GH has received research grants or honorarium from Fédération Française de Cardiologie, Cordis, Boston, Medtronic, Terumo, Biotronik, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Bristol-Myer Squibb and Sanofi-Aventis. JPC has received research grants or honorarium from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli-Lilly, Fédération Française de Cardiologie, Lead-Up, Medtronic, MSD, Sanofi-Aventis and WebMD. GM has received research grants or honorarium from ADIR, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Berlin Chimie AG, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical, Brigham Women’s Hospital, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Celladon, CME Resources, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli-Lilly, Europa, Elsevier, Fédération Française de Cardiologie, Fondazione Anna Maria Sechi per il Cuore, Gilead, ICAN, Janssen, Lead-Up, Menarini, Medtronic, MSD, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier, The Medicines Company, TIMI Study Group and WebMD. Other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.)

Background: Among patients with STEMI in the ATLANTIC study, pre-hospital administration of ticagrelor improved post-PCI ST-segment resolution and 30-day stent thrombosis. We investigated whether this clinical benefit with pre-hospital ticagrelor differs by ischemic duration., Methods: In a post hoc analysis we compared absence of ST-segment resolution post-PCI and stent thrombosis at 30 days between randomized treatment groups (pre- versus in-hospital ticagrelor) stratified by symptom onset to first medical contact (FMC) duration [≤1 hour (n = 773), >1 to ≤3 hours (n = 772), and >3 hours (n = 311)], examining the interaction between randomized treatment strategy and duration of symptom onset to FMC for each outcome., Results: Patients presenting later after symptom onset were older, more likely to be female, and have higher baseline risk. Patients with symptom onset to FMC >3 hours had the greatest improvement in post-PCI ST-segment elevation resolution with pre- versus in-hospital ticagrelor (absolute risk difference: ≤1 hour, 2.9% vs. >1 to ≤3 hours, 3.6% vs. >3 hours, 12.2%; adjusted p for interaction = 0.13), while patients with shorter duration of ischemia had greater improvement in stent thrombosis at 30 days with pre- versus in-hospital ticagrelor (absolute risk difference: ≤1 hour, 1.3% vs. >1 hour to ≤3 hours, 0.7% vs. >3 hours, 0.4%; adjusted p for interaction = 0.55). Symptom onset to active ticagrelor administration was independently associated with stent thrombosis at 30 days (adjusted OR 1.89 per 100 minute delay, 95%CI 1.20-2.97, P < .01), but not post-PCI ST-segment resolution (P = .41)., Conclusions: The effect of pre-hospital ticagrelor to reduce stent thrombosis was most evident when given early within 3 hours after symptom onset, with delay in ticagrelor administration after symptom onset associated with higher rate of stent thrombosis. These findings re-emphasize the need for early ticagrelor administration in primary PCI treated STEMI patients., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The potential interactions between prehospital (pre-H) ticagrelor administration and thrombus aspiration (TA) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have never been studied. Therefore, we evaluated the potential benefit of TA and pre-H ticagrelor treatment in patients enrolled in the ATLANTIC trial (NCT01347580)., Methods: This analysis included 1,630 patients who underwent primary PCI. Multivariate analysis was used to explore the potential association of TA and pre-H treatment to clinical outcomes. Potential interactions between TA and pre-H ticagrelor were also explored., Results: A total of 941 (57.7%) patients underwent TA. In adjusted multivariate logistic model, pre-H ticagrelor treatment was significantly associated with less frequent new MI or definite stent *thrombosis (ST) (odds ratio [OR] 0.43, 95% CI 0.20-0.92, P=.031), or definite ST (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.07-0.91, P=.036) at 30 days. Patients treated with TA had higher frequency of Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow 0-1 compared with no-TA group (80.7% vs 51.9%, P<.0001). TA when also adjusted for TIMI flow 0-1 showed significant association only for higher bailout use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.18-2.50, P=.004) and more frequent 30-day TIMI major bleeding (OR 2.92, 95% CI 1.10-7.76, P=.032). No significant interactions between TA and pre-H ticagrelor were present for the explored end points., Conclusions: TA when left to physicians' discretion was used in high-risk patients, was associated with bailout use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and TIMI major bleeding, and had no impact on 30-day clinical outcomes. Conversely, pre-H ticagrelor treatment predicted lower 30-day rates of ST or new MI without interaction with TA., (Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Aldosterone stimulates cardiac collagen synthesis. Circulating biomarkers of collagen turnover provide a useful tool for the assessment of cardiac remodeling in patients with an acute myocardial infarction (MI)., Methods: The REMINDER trial assessed the effect of eplerenone in patients with an acute ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) without known heart failure (HF), when initiated within 24 h of symptom onset. The primary outcome was almost totally (>90%) driven by natriuretic peptide (NP) thresholds after 1-month post-MI (it also included a composite of cardiovascular death or re-hospitalization or new onset HF or sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation or LVEF ≤40% after 1-month post-MI). This secondary analysis aims to assess the extracellular matrix marker (ECMM) levels with regards to: (1) patients` characteristics; (2) determinants; (3) and eplerenone effect., Results: Serum levels of ECMM were measured in 526 (52%) of the 1012 patients enrolled in the REMINDER trial. Patients with procollagen type III N-terminal propeptide (PIIINP) above the median were older and had worse renal function (p < 0.05). Worse renal function was associated with increased levels of PIIINP (standardized β ≈ 0.20, p < 0.05). Eplerenone reduced PIIINP when the levels of this biomarker were above the median of 3.9 ng/mL (0.13 ± 1.48 vs. -0.37 ± 1.56 ng/mL, p = 0.008). Higher levels of PIIINP were independently associated with higher proportion of NP above the prespecified thresholds (HR = 1.95, 95% CI 1.16-3.29, p = 0.012)., Conclusions: Eplerenone effectively reduces PIIINP levels when baseline values were above the median. Eplerenone may limit ECMM formation in post-MI without HF.

Background: Prior Studies have suggested better outcomes in smokers compared with nonsmokers receiving clopidogrel ("smoker's paradox"). The impact of a more intensive clopidogrel regimen on ischemic and bleeding risks in smokers with acute coronary syndromes requiring percutaneous coronary interventions remains unclear., Methods and Results: We analyzed 17 263 acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention from the CURRENT-OASIS 7 (Clopidogrel and Aspirin Optimal Dose Usage to Reduce Recurrent Events-Seventh Organization to Assess Strategies in Ischemic Symptoms) trial, which compared double-dose (600 mg day 1;150 mg days 2-7; then 75 mg daily) versus standard-dose (300 mg day 1; then 75 mg daily) clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome patients. The primary outcome was cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke at 30 days. Interactions between treatment allocation and smoking status (current smokers versus nonsmokers) were evaluated. Overall, 6394 patients (37.0%) were current smokers. For the comparison of double- versus standard-dose clopidogrel, there were significant interactions in smokers and nonsmokers for the primary outcome ( P =0.031) and major bleeding ( P =0.002). Double- versus standard-dose clopidogrel reduced the primary outcome among smokers by 34% (hazard ratio [HR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-0.87, P =0.003), whereas in nonsmokers, there was no apparent benefit (HR 0.96, 95% CI, 0.80-1.14, P =0.61). For major bleeding, there was no difference between the groups in smokers (HR 0.77, 95% CI, 0.48-1.24, P =0.28), whereas in nonsmokers, the double-dose clopidogrel regimen increased bleeding (HR 1.89, 95% CI, 1.37-2.60, P <0.0001). Double-dose clopidogrel reduced the incidence of definite stent thrombosis in smokers (HR 0.41, 95% CI, 0.24-0.71) and nonsmokers (HR 0.63, 95% CI, 0.42-0.93; P for interaction=0.19)., Conclusions: In smokers, a double-dose clopidogrel regimen reduced major cardiovascular events and stent thrombosis after percutaneous coronary intervention, with no increase in major bleeding. This suggests that clopidogrel dosing in patients with acute coronary syndromes should be personalized, taking into consideration both ischemic and bleeding risk., Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00335452., (© 2017 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.)

Background: ATLANTIC was a randomized study comparing pre- and in-hospital treatment with a ticagrelor loading dose (LD) in ongoing ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We sought to compare patient characteristics and clinical outcomes in France with other countries participating in ATLANTIC., Methods: The population comprised 1862 patients, 660 (35.4%) from France and 1202 from 12 other countries. The main endpoints were reperfusion (≥70% ST-segment elevation resolution) and TIMI flow grade 3 before (co-primary endpoints) and after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Other endpoints included a composite ischaemic endpoint (death/myocardial infarction/stroke/urgent revascularization/definite stent thrombosis) and bleeding events at 30days., Results: In France, median times from first LD to angiography and between first and second LDs were 49 and 35min, respectively, and were similar to other countries. French patients were younger (mean 58.7 vs 61.9years, p<0.0001) and characterized by a higher rate of radial access (89.9% vs 54.8%, p<0.0001), more frequent use of pre-hospital glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors (14.1% vs 3.1%, p<0.0001) and intravenous enoxaparin (57.3% vs 10.1%, p<0.0001). In France, as in other countries, the co-primary endpoints did not differ between the two randomization groups. The composite ischaemic endpoint was numerically lower in France (3.3% vs 5.1%, p=0.07), with a lower mortality (1.4% vs 3.3%, p=0.01). PLATO major bleeding was numerically less frequent in France (1.8% vs 3.2%, p=0.07)., Conclusions: The French population appears to have better outcomes than the rest of the study population, and seems related to differences in demographics and management characteristics., Trial Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01347580)., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)