Search

Background: Severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) can be treated with instrumented fusion, but the number of anchors needed for optimal correction is controversial., Methods: We conducted a multicenter, randomized study that included patients undergoing spinal fusion for single thoracic curves between 45° and 65°, the most common form of operatively treated AIS. Of the 211 patients randomized, 108 were assigned to a high-density screw pattern and 103, to a low-density screw pattern. Surgeons were instructed to use ≥1.8 implants per spinal level fused for patients in the high-implant-density group or ≤1.4 implants per spinal level fused for patients in the low-implant-density group. The primary outcome measure was the percent correction of the coronal curve at the 2-year follow-up. The power analysis for this trial required 174 patients to show equivalence, defined as a 95% confidence interval (CI) within a ±10% correction margin with a probability of 90%., Results: In the intention-to-treat analysis, the mean percent correction of the coronal curve was equivalent between the high-density and low-density groups at the 2-year follow-up (67.6% versus 65.7%; difference, -1.9% [95% CI: -6.1%, 2.2%]). In the per-protocol cohorts, the mean percent correction of the coronal curve was also equivalent between the 2 groups at the 2-year follow-up (65.0% versus 66.1%; difference, 1.1% [95% CI: -3.0%, 5.2%]). A total of 6 patients in the low-density group and 5 patients in the high-density group required reoperation (p = 1.0)., Conclusions: In the setting of spinal fusion for primary thoracic AIS curves between 45° and 65°, the percent coronal curve correction obtained with use of a low-implant-density construct and that obtained with use of a high-implant-density construct were equivalent., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article ( http://links.lww.com/JBJS/H763 )., (Copyright © 2023 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.)

Purpose: Selective thoracic fusion (STF) for double curve patterns in idiopathic scoliosis is an attractive treatment option. However, short-term coronal decompensation and truncal imbalance are known findings. Previous studies with hook constructs showed that eventually balance is achieved via an increase in lumbar curve magnitude, as the lumbosacral obliquity did not change following surgery. Our aim is to investigate patients with idiopathic curves who underwent STF using all-pedicle screw constructs to determine if the uninstrumented lumbar curve and lumbosacral obliquity responded in the same manner as was previously reported with all-hook constructs., Methods: 102 consecutive patients with Lenke 1B, 1C or 3C curves who underwent STF using all-screw constructs at a single institution were included in this study. Radiographic assessment was performed, and patient reported outcomes were obtained. Subgroup analyses were performed based on preoperative thoracic: lumbar curve ratio as well as lumbar curve magnitude., Results: Overall, the patients showed statistically significant improvement in both trunk shift and L4-pelvis obliquity at final follow-up. The uninstrumented lumbar curves trended toward improvement over time, but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.107). SRS-30 scores were statistically significantly improved in multiple domains., Conclusion: Selective thoracic fusion is an excellent treatment option in most double curve patterns. Balance in the coronal plane is predictably achieved at 2-year follow-up. The lumbosacral obliquity improves more with screw technology than was previously found with hook constructs; therefore, the improvement in balance over time does not depend upon an increase in the uninstrumented lumbar curve., Level of Evidence: IV.

Study Design: Single-institution, retrospective review of prospectively collected data on pediatric patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) undergoing spinal fusion with a minimum two-year follow-up., Objective: To determine the rate of reoperation in AIS patients undergoing spine fusion from 2008 to 2012., Summary of Background Data: Recent trends in the surgical treatment of AIS have included increased use of all-pedicle screw constructs, smaller implants, more posterior-only approaches, and improved correction techniques., Methods: A retrospective review of 467 patients undergoing spinal fusion from 2008 to 2012 was performed. Demographic, clinical, radiographic, and surgical data were collected prospectively on all patients for the index procedure and any reoperations. Data were compared to previously published cohorts of patients from the authors' institution who underwent spinal fusion for AIS between 1988 and 2007., Results: The rate of reoperation in this five-year cohort of patients was 9.9%. The most common indications for reoperation were infection (4.5%: 2.4% delayed infections and 2.1% acute infections), symptomatic implants (2.1%), and misplaced pedicle screws (1.7%). When compared to the 2003-2007 cohort, the rate of reoperation for acute infection and malpositioned pedicle screws increased significantly (p = .01 and p = .04), whereas the rate of reoperation for curve progression decreased (p = .01). Reoperations for acute infections and malpositioned pedicle screws also increased significantly (p = .047 and p = .042) compared with the 1988-2002 cohort, whereas the rate of reoperation for pseudarthrosis decreased (p = .002)., Conclusion: Reoperation rates for AIS have not improved with more sophisticated implants and techniques, predominantly because of increased acute infections and malpositioned pedicle screws despite decreasing pseudarthrosis rates and curve progression., Level of Evidence: Level II., (Copyright © 2017 Scoliosis Research Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: Retrospective review., Objectives: To assess whether the lumbar gap (LG) measurement, which is the distance between the center sacral vertical line and the concave edge of the apical vertebra of the lumbar curve, would be a useful tool to predict the need for lumbar curve fusion in the Lenke 1-4C curves., Summary of Background Data: The current treatment guidelines of selective thoracic fusion in the Lenke 1-4C curves are not routinely accepted., Methods: One hundred three adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients had undergone either selective thoracic fusion (STF) or both thoracic and lumbar curves fusion (TLF) for Lenke 1-4C curves. The correlations between the fusion decision making and preoperative LG, coronal balance, thoracic and lumbar Cobb, apical vertebra translation, and rotation were analyzed. The radiographic outcomes and SRS-30 of a minimum 2-year follow-up were reviewed in each group., Results: A total of 51 patients (49.5%) underwent an STF, and 52 patients (50.5%) underwent a TLF. The mean LG was 22.0 ± 8.8 mm in the TLF, which was 2.3 times greater than the STF (9.6 ± 3.9 mm) (p < .0001). Only 5% of the lumbar curves were fused when the LG was 10 mm or less. Ninety percent of the lumbar curves were fused when the LG was 16 mm or greater, and 100% lumbar curves were fused with an LG of 21 mm or greater. The preoperative coronal imbalance to the left in the TLF was significantly greater than the STF. A mean 47% thoracic correction corresponded to a mean 39% spontaneous correction of the lumbar curve obtained in the SFT, which was significantly different from the TLF (56% and 65%). There were no differences in the SRS-30 scores at 2 years postoperatively between the STF and the TLF., Conclusion: The lumbar curve should not be fused when the LG was 10 mm or less, and very likely should be fused when the LG exceeds 20 mm in the Lenke 1-4C AIS patients., Level of Evidence: Level III., (Copyright © 2017 Scoliosis Research Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The purpose of this study is to assess radiographic shoulder measures from the preoperative to the postoperative time period, specifically to determine whether T1 tilt could be used as an intraoperative proxy for shoulder balance determination. This study focused on radiographic shoulder measures of 619 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients who underwent spinal deformity surgery., Methods: A prospective, multicenter database of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis was queried to identify all patients who had undergone spinal deformity surgery with >2 years of follow-up postoperatively. Radiographic analysis focused on measures of shoulder balance: T1 tilt, clavicle angle, and radiographic shoulder height., Results: A total of 619 patients were included in this analysis. Mean age at surgery was 14.8 years with 83% female. Mean preoperative curve size was 58.0 degrees. Mean T1 tilt preoperatively was -0.10 degrees and postoperatively 2.42 degrees. Mean clavicle angle preoperatively was -1.39 degrees and postoperatively 0.79 degrees. Mean radiographic shoulder height preoperatively was -7.04 mm and postoperatively 1.63 mm. All 3 radiographic parameters demonstrated reasonable correlation preoperatively and postoperatively to each other. To assess the viability of T1 tilt as an intraoperative proxy for shoulder balance, standardized ratios between the variables were created. Analysis of these ratios demonstrated little or no relationship preoperatively to postoperatively, hence the relationship of T1 tilt to radiographic shoulder height does not remain constant., Conclusions: Analysis of the relationship of T1 tilt to radiographic shoulder height from preoperative to postoperative did not demonstrate consistency. Lenke 3 and 6 curve patterns demonstrated preoperative to postoperative correlation, both with nonstructural proximal thoracic curves; however, for the remaining curve patterns T1 tilt cannot be used as an intraoperative proxy for shoulder balance., Level of Evidence: Level IV.

Objective: There is substantial heterogeneity in the number of screws used per level fused in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery. Assuming equivalent clinical outcomes, the potential cost savings of using fewer pedicle screws were estimated using a medical decision model with sensitivity analysis., Methods: Descriptive analyses explored the annual costs for 5710 AIS inpatient stays using discharge data from the 2009 Kids' Inpatient Database (Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality), which is a national all-payer inpatient database. Patients between 10 and 17 years of age were identified using the ICD-9-CM code for idiopathic scoliosis (737.30). All inpatient stays were assumed to represent 10-level fusions with pedicle screws for AIS. High screw density was defined at 1.8 screws per level fused, and the standard screw density was defined as 1.48 screws per level fused. The surgical return for screw malposition was set at $23,762. A sensitivity analysis was performed by varying the cost per screw ($600-$1000) and the rate of surgical revisions for screw malposition (0.117%-0.483% of screws; 0.8%-4.3% of patients). The reported outcomes include estimated prevented malpositioned screws (set at 5.1%), averted revision surgeries, and annual cost savings in 2009 US dollars, assuming similar clinical outcomes (rates of complications, revision) using a standard- versus high-density pattern., Results: The total annual costs for 5710 AIS hospital stays was $278 million ($48,900 per patient). Substituting a high for a standard screw density yields 3.2 fewer screws implanted per patient, with 932 malpositioned screws prevented and 21 to 88 revision surgeries for implant malposition averted, and a potential annual cost savings of $11 million to $20 million (4%-7% reduction in the total cost of AIS hospitalizations)., Conclusions: Reducing the number of screws used in scoliosis surgery could potentially decrease national AIS hospitalization costs by up to 7%, which may improve the safety and efficiency of care. However, such a screw construct must first be proven safe and effective.

Study Design: Multicenter retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data., Objective: Evaluate radiographical and clinical characteristics of patients undergoing a selective thoracic fusion (STF) for Lenke 1C curves., Summary of Background Data: STF of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis has been advocated for the so-called "false double major" curve (Lenke 1C/King type II). Despite these recommendations, many surgeons continue to perform nonselective fusions for this curve type. It is unknown to what extent other factors influence the surgeon's fusion-level selection., Methods: A prospective multicenter database included 264 patients with surgically treated Lenke 1C curves and were divided into 2 groups. The STF group included patients with the lowest instrumented vertebra at or cephalad to L1, whereas the nonselective fusion group included patients with the lowest instrumented vertebra at or caudal to L3. Preoperative radiographical, clinical (scoliometer), Scoliosis Appearance Questionnaire (SAQ), and Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) questionnaires were analyzed and compared., Results: Only 138 of 264 patients (49%) underwent an STF. Sex ratio (90% vs. 86% female), average age (14.7 vs. 14.8 yr), and preoperative main thoracic Cobb angles (56.0° ± 9.9° vs. 55.3° ± 11.4°) were not significantly different (STF vs. nonselective fusion). However, the average thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) preoperative Cobb angle was significantly smaller in the STF group (42.1° ± 8.6° vs. 47.0° ± 9.0°; P < 0.001), whereas the main thoracic: TL/L Cobb ratio (1.35 ± 0.20 vs. 1.18 ± 0.15; P < 0.001), apical vertebral translation, and rotation (1.82 ± 0.59 vs. 1.31 ± 0.53; P < 0.001), (1.16 vs. 0.98; P < 0.001) ratios were significantly greater in the STF group. Preoperative coronal balance, sagittal Cobb angles (including T10-L2 kyphosis) and Risser Grade were not significantly different. Preoperative TL/L scoliometer measures were significantly less in the STF group (8.1° ± 3.7° vs. 10.3° ± 5.4°; P = 0.001). On the SAQ, the STF group had less desire for an appearance change., Conclusion: Despite the recommendation to fuse only the structural thoracic curve in a 1C curve, only 49% of patients were treated with an STF. Those undergoing an STF had smaller TL/L Cobb angles, less TL/L clinical deformity, larger main thoracic: TL/L ratios, and less desire for an appearance change., Level of Evidence: 3.

Background: Perioperative surgical site infection (SSI) after pediatric spine fusion is a recognized complication with rates between 0.5% and 1.6% in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and up to 22% in "high risk" patients. Significant variation in the approach to infection prophylaxis has been well documented. The purpose of this initiative is to develop a consensus-based "Best Practice" Guideline (BPG), informed by both the available evidence in the literature and expert opinion, for high-risk pediatric patients undergoing spine fusion. For the purpose of this effort, high risk was defined as anything other than a primary fusion in a patient with idiopathic scoliosis without significant comorbidities. The ultimate goal of this initiative is to decrease the wide variability in SSI prevention strategies in this area, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes and reduced health care costs., Methods: An expert panel composed of 20 pediatric spine surgeons and 3 infectious disease specialists from North America, selected for their extensive experience in the field of pediatric spine surgery, was developed. Using the Delphi process and iterative rounds using a nominal group technique, participants in this panel were as follows: (1) surveyed for current practices; (2) presented with a detailed systematic review of the relevant literature; (3) given the opportunity to voice opinion collectively; and (4) asked to vote regarding preferences privately. Round 1 was conducted using an electronic survey. Initial results were compiled and discussed face-to-face. Round 2 was conducted using the Audience Response System, allowing participants to vote for (strongly support or support) or against inclusion of each intervention. Agreement >80% was considered consensus. Interventions without consensus were discussed and revised, if feasible. Repeat voting for consensus was performed., Results: Consensus was reached to support 14 SSI prevention strategies and all participants agreed to implement the BPG in their practices. All agreed to participate in further studies assessing implementation and effectiveness of the BPG. The final consensus driven BPG for high-risk pediatric spine surgery patients includes: (1) patients should have a chlorhexidine skin wash the night before surgery; (2) patients should have preoperative urine cultures obtained; (3) patients should receive a preoperative Patient Education Sheet; (4) patients should have a preoperative nutritional assessment; (5) if removing hair, clipping is preferred to shaving; (6) patients should receive perioperative intravenous cefazolin; (7) patients should receive perioperative intravenous prophylaxis for gram-negative bacilli; (8) adherence to perioperative antimicrobial regimens should be monitored; (9) operating room access should be limited during scoliosis surgery (whenever practical); (10) UV lights need NOT be used in the operating room; (11) patients should have intraoperative wound irrigation; (12) vancomycin powder should be used in the bone graft and/or the surgical site; (13) impervious dressings are preferred postoperatively; (14) postoperative dressing changes should be minimized before discharge to the extent possible., Conclusions: In conclusion, we present a consensus-based BPG consisting of 14 recommendations for the prevention of SSIs after spine surgery in high-risk pediatric patients. This can serve as a tool to reduce the variability in practice in this area and help guide research priorities in the future. Pending such data, it is the unsubstantiated opinion of the authors of the current paper that adherence to recommendations in the BPG will not only decrease variability in practice but also result in fewer SSI in high-risk children undergoing spinal fusion., Level of Evidence: Not applicable.

Study Design: A retrospective case series., Objective: To identify the overall reoperation rate and factors contributing to reoperation in a recent 5-year cohort of patients (2003-2007) undergoing spinal deformity surgery. These patients were compared with a previously published 15-year cohort of consecutive patients (1988-2002) from the same institution to assess for any significant differences in reoperation rates., Summary of Background Data: In a previously published report from this institution, the reoperation rate for patients with idiopathic scoliosis treated during a 15-year period (1988-2002) was 12.9%. That group was predominantly treated with first-generation TSRH (Medtronic, Memphis, TN) implants and CD implants. Lower profile, more rigid implant systems are now used along with refined techniques for correction of scoliosis deformity. We hypothesized that these factors would lead to lower rates of reoperation. METHODS.: The medical records of 452 consecutive patients (older than 9 yr) surgically treated for idiopathic scoliosis at one institution during 5 years (2003-2007) were reviewed to identify those who required reoperation., Results: The reoperation rate for this cohort was 7.5% (34 of 452 patients). Compared with the prior cohort, significant decreases were noted with regard to total reoperation rate as well as reoperation due to infection and pseudarthrosis. Trends were noted toward decreased rates of reoperation due to prominent implants, dislodged implants, and implant proximity to vital structures. Within the newer cohort, a trend toward decreased reoperation rate was also noted for lower profile implant systems compared with first-generation TSRH implants., Conclusion: With the evolution of newer lower profile segmental implant systems that provide more rigid fixation and with the advancements in techniques for deformity correction, the repeat surgical intervention rate for idiopathic scoliosis has decreased.

Study Design: A retrospective cohort study comparing long-term clinical and radiographical outcomes using selective thoracic instrumented fusion versus long instrumented fusion for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS)., Objective: To evaluate long-term behavior of the lumbar curve in patients with AIS treated with selective thoracic fusion and to assess clinical outcome measures in this patient population compared with those patients treated with fusion in the lumbar spine., Summary of Background Data: Selective thoracic fusion for the treatment of AIS preserves motion segments, but leaves residual lumbar deformity. Long-term results of selective fusion using segmental fixation are limited., Methods: Nineteen patients with AIS treated with selective thoracic fusion and 9 patients treated with a long fusion returned at a mean 20 years (range, 14-24 years) postoperatively for radiographs, clinical evaluation, and outcome surveys (Short Form-12, Scoliosis Research Society-24, Spinal Appearance Questionnaire, Oswestry Disability Index, and visual analogue scale for pain and stiffness). Curve types were Lenke 1B, 1C, or 3C. All patients underwent posterior fusion with Texas Scottish Rite Hospital or Cotrel-Dubousset hook-rod instrumentation., Results: The selective thoracic fusion group had no significant progression in the lumbar curve magnitude and no worsening of L4 obliquity to the pelvis between initial postoperative and 20-year follow-up. Mean preoperative lumbar curve magnitude (mean, 44°; range, 32-64) corrected 43% on initial postoperative films versus 38% at latest follow-up. Mean L4 obliquity to the pelvis, trunk shift, sagittal balance, and coronal balance were stable over time. Outcome scores between the 2 groups were similar. Scores in long fusion group, when compared with the selective group, were higher for 2 Scoliosis Research Society domains: self-image after surgery (P = 0.005) and function after surgery (P = 0.0006)., Conclusion: Spinal balance and correction of the lumbar curve remain stable over time in selective thoracic fusion. Those with selective fusions have outcome measures comparable with those with long fusions.

Background: Multiple reports have demonstrated the superiority of all-pedicle screw constructs, over hybrid and hook constructs, for severe sagittal and coronal deformities (>70 degrees) and have made anterior spinal releasing unnecessary for almost all spinal deformities. However, for lesser deformities, specifically coronal deformities <70 degrees, published studies have not been able to consistently demonstrate clinical superiority of all-pedicle screw constructs over hook or hybrid constructs., Methods: A prospective, multicenter database on AIS identified patients with <70 degrees main thoracic (MT) curves surgically treated with a posterior spinal fusion. Inclusion criteria were: Lenke 1A and 2A curve patterns, neurologically normal, primary surgery only, and at least 13 years of age at surgery or be Risser 3 or greater and a construct consisting of all-pedicle screws (PS) or hybrid instrumentation. Minimum follow-up was 2 years postoperative. Patients were excluded if surgeries included any releases (laminectomies, ligament releases, or osteotomies), which may increase curve flexibility., Results: A total of 101 patients satisfied the criteria for inclusion: PS (n=53) and hybrid (n=48). Preoperative patient data, preoperative curve characteristics, and operative data were similar between the 2 groups. Postoperative thoracic coronal Cobb demonstrated PS had better proximal thoracic (PT) and MT correction, MT Cobb correction % and correction index than hybrid. Interestingly there were no differences in correction index/fixation point between the 2 groups, indicating PS constructs achieved better correction due, at least in part, to the greater number of spine fixation points. Lower instrumented vertebrae tilt and rotational correction was better in the PS group than hybrid. At 2-year follow-up PS had better absolute forced expiratory volume in 1 second values, trunk shift, and total scoliosis appearance questionnaire than hybrids. T5-T12 sagittal alignment was unchanged at 2-year follow-up for PS versus increased kyphosis in hybrids., Conclusions: All-pedicle screw systems had better coronal correction, lower instrumented vertebrae tilt, MT scoliometer measurements and scoliosis appearance questionnaire total measures than hybrid constructs. The improved coronal correction in the PS group is likely due, in part, to the higher number of spine fixation points than used in the hybrid groups.

Background: Pedicle screws are widely used in spinal surgery. There is extensive published literature concerning the use of pedicle screw instrumentation for spinal surgery in adults. Now there is a trend to use pedicle screws in pediatric patients, including the very young. A systematic review of the current English-language literature on the use of pedicle screw instrumentation in the pediatric age group was performed to specifically determine (1) the pedicle screw placement accuracy in patients with spine deformity and (2) the effect size of all-pedicle screw constructs compared with other methods of spinal instrumentation in terms of the percentage of scoliosis correction., Methods: English-language studies of pedicle screw use in pediatric patients (defined as those younger than eighteen years of age) were included. Descriptive statistics synthesized the accuracy of pedicle screw placement. Accuracy rates were compared between pediatric and adult patients. The effect of pedicle screw instrumentation on scoliosis correction was calculated with use of Cobb angle measurements., Results: On the basis of the literature search, 1181 articles were screened, 320 abstracts were examined, and ninety full-text articles representing 5761 patients were reviewed in detail. Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria for the analysis of pedicle screw placement accuracy. A total of 13,536 pedicle screws were placed in 1353 pediatric patients. The overall placement accuracy rate in pediatric patients was 94.9%, which was higher than the rate of 91.5% reported for adults. The weighted, geometric, and 5% trimmed mean accuracy rates of pedicle screw placement were 91.9%, 88.5%, and 89.1%, respectively (standard deviation = 10%; interquartile range = 10%). Sixteen comparative studies met the inclusion criteria for the analysis of the effect of pedicle screw instrumentation on scoliosis correction. Pedicle screw constructs had a significantly larger percentage of Cobb angle correction compared with hooks (Cohen's d = 1.14) and hybrid constructs (Cohen's d = 0.49)., Conclusions: The accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the pediatric spine exceeds the accuracy rate reported in adults. Pedicle screw instrumentation constructs are significantly more effective for scoliosis correction, as determined on the basis of Cobb angle measurements, than are hook constructs and hybrid constructs.

Study Design: Clinical study correlating preoperative pulmonary function tests (PFTs) to radiographic measures of thoracic deformity severity in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients., Objective: To determine (1) the incidence of clinically relevant (<65% predicted value) pulmonary impairment in AIS patients; (2) if patients with more severe deformity have greater impairment of PFTs than those with lesser deformity; (3) the effect, if any, of juvenile onset deformity (onset65%. Patients with MT curves>70°, and especially >80°; proximal thoracic (PT) curves which were >30° or structural; or T5-T12 kyphosis<10° had significantly (P≤0.001) lower FEV1 or FVC compared to those with less deformity. Axial plane deformity did not correlate with PFT impairment. Juvenile-onset patients had greater PFT impairment than AIS patients, along with slightly larger MT curves. Patients who were braced before surgery had worse PFTs than those had no treatment before surgery., Conclusion: Preoperative PFTs are clinically impaired in 19% of AIS patients, and correlate significantly with the MT and sagittal plane deformity severity, and with PT curve severity to a lesser degree. PFTs do not correlate with degree of axial deformity. From a purely pulmonary standpoint, attention directed to coronal and sagittal plane deformity correction appears warranted, to address the specific deformities which are associated with PFT impairment.

Background: Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP) has been found to be a powerful adjunct to healing nonunions and obtaining fusions. Despite the apparent clinical efficacy and good safety profile reported with rhBMP use in adults, there is little data regarding the safety of this product in pediatric patients. We evaluated the use of rhBMP-2 in pediatric patients to determine if any complications were associated with its use., Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 81 patients, all less then 18 years old, in whom rhBMP-2 was used. Theoretical complications associated with rhBMP-2 use were compiled based on a review of the published literature on rhBMP-2. A review of each patient's chart and radiographs was performed to record the occurrences of complications, which may have been associated with the use of rhBMP-2., Results: A total of 16 complications were found, which may have been attributed to the use of rhBMP-2. There were no incidences of systemic toxicity associated with rhBMP-2 use. Nine patients were noted to have some local operative site problem, 3 deep infections were noted, 1 patient was found to have a postoperative compartment syndrome, 2 patients were found to have neurologic complications (1 with progressive myelopathy and 1 with weakness and dural fibrosis), and 1 patient with neurofibromatosis and previously diagnosed intracranial gliomas was found to have subsequent enlargement of these gliomas. In reviewing these complications, only the case of dural fibrosis and subsequent weakness was thought to possibly be directly related to the use of rhBMP-2., Conclusion: We found few complications in pediatric patients, which were felt to be directly attributable to the use of rhBMP-2. As such, rhBMP-2 use seems to be relatively safe in this young patient population. Due to the current use of this product in pediatric patients in an "off-label" fashion, we recommend a thorough discussion of the possible risks and benefits of this product with the family before its use., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic studies-Level IV.

Study Design: Retrospective comparison study of patients who had a delayed infection following a posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation (PSFI) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS)., Objective: To define risk factors for the development of delayed infections following PSFI for AIS by comparing those patients who developed this complication to a randomly selected group of patients who did not., Summary of Background Data: Despite studies reporting the incidence and treatment of delayed infection following PSFI for AIS, there are no studies analyzing risk factors for its occurrence., Methods: All patients who required treatment for delayed infections following PSFI for AIS were identified (infection group, n = 36). A random selection of patients who did not develop a delayed infection (no infection, n = 90) was made in a ratio of 3:1 (no infection/infection). The 2 groups were compared using statistical methods., Results: Parameters associated with the infection group included: presence of a significant medical history, surgeon, less surgical time, a more distal fusion level (16% infection rate with a thoracic LIV vs. 33% infection rate with a lumbar LIV), not using postoperative drains, and increased drainage when drains were used. Other factors associated with infection were use of a blood transfusion and when increasing units of transfusion were used. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified 3 factors that remained statistically significant: 1) significant medical history, 2) receiving a blood transfusion, and 3) not using a postoperative drain. Factors that were not associated with delayed infection included body mass index, the number of anchor points used, use of allograft bone, and the total number of levels instrumented and antibiotic regimen., Conclusion: The occurrence of a delayed infection is most likely multifactorial and is related to a positive past medical history and the use of blood transfusions. Postoperative use of a drain may be important to avoid delayed infection.

Study Design: A retrospective chart review was performed on all idiopathic scoliosis patients treated with instrumented spinal fusion over a 15-year period., Objectives: To provide an experience from a single institution over a prolonged time period. The goal was to determine the frequency of repeat surgical interventions following the "definitive" spinal fusion surgery and identify the factors responsible for these reoperations., Summary of Background Data: Instrumented spinal fusion remains the standard of care in the surgical management of idiopathic scoliosis. This surgery is considered a "definitive" procedure where, barring a complication, no additional surgical procedures are planned. Although many studies have reported the frequency of specific complications following spinal fusion, little information currently exists regarding the cumulative average of these repeat surgical interventions that occur following these "definitive" procedures., Methods: Surgical logs were reviewed on all patients who had an instrumented spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis from January 1988 through December 2002. All subsequent surgical interventions on these patients were then identified from the logs through December 2004. Pertinent information was gleaned from surgical logs and patient charts to provide details for these reoperations., Results: A total of 1,046 patients underwent an instrumented spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis: 809 had a posterior-only fusion, 228 had an anterior-only fusion, and 9 had a combined anterior/posterior spinal fusion. A total of 172 repeat surgical interventions were performed in 135 patients (12.9%). Of these 135 patients, 29 patients (21.5%) had two or more separate procedures performed. The most common reasons for reoperation were infection, symptomatic implant, and pseudarthrosis. Patients who had posterior fusions had a significantly higher rate of reoperation than patients who had anterior fusions (14.0% vs. 9.3%). Reoperations due to infections and symptomatic implants occurred with significantly higher frequency in the posterior spine fusion group compared with those with anterior spinal fusion. No differences in rates of reoperation for pseudarthrosis were noted between posterior and anterior fusion groups., Conclusions: Repeat surgical interventions are relatively common following these supposedly definitive surgical procedures. The most common reasons for return to surgery are infection, symptomatic implant, and pseudarthrosis.

Study Design: A retrospective multicenter study., Objective: To investigate the relationship between the lowest instrumented, stable, and lower end vertebrae in patients with "single overhang" thoracic (main thoracic) curves treated with anterior or posterior spinal fusion., Summary of Background Data: Previous studies have shown "saving" fusion levels with anterior spinal fusion, as opposed to posterior spinal fusion; however, to our knowledge, none of these studies evaluated the relative position to the lower end vertebra to compare study groups accurately. For clarification, "single overhang" includes Lenke 1A and 1B curves. For these thoracic curves, the lumbar curve does not cross the midline., Materials and Methods: A retrospective multicenter study of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis was performed to identify specifically patients with "single overhang" thoracic (Lenke 1A and 1B) curves with more than a 2-year follow-up. To analyze relative fusion levels, the differences were computed as follows: (1) the difference between the vertebra position for the stable vertebra of the main thoracic (MT) curve and the lowest instrumented vertebra, as noted on postoperative radiographs, or [equation: see text] (2) the difference between the vertebra position for the lower end vertebra of the main thoracic (MT) curve and the lowest instrumented vertebra, as noted on postoperative radiographs, or [equation: see text]., Results: A total of 298 "single overhang" thoracic curves (148 Lenke 1A, 150 Lenke 1B) were identified, of which 293 had either an anterior spinal fusion or posterior spinal fusion; 5 patients underwent a combined anterior-posterior spinal fusion. Anterior spinal fusion was performed in 70 patients (23.9%) and posterior spinal fusion in 223 (76.1%). While comparing the lowest instrumented vertebra to the stable vertebra with anterior spinal fusion, the lowest instrumented vertebra was identified either at the level of the stable vertebra or above in 97% of 1A/B curves (P < 0.001). Using posterior spinal fusion techniques, the lowest instrumented vertebra was identified either at the stable vertebra or above in 65% of the 1A/B curves (P < 0.05)., Conclusions: These data confirm that anterior spinal fusion techniques result in a mean shorter fusion of 1.5 vertebral segments/patient when compared to posterior spinal fusion techniques with respect to the position of the lowest instrumented and stable vertebrae for "single overhang" thoracic (Lenke 1A/B) curves. However, because this is a retrospective multicenter study over 10 years, it represents various posterior spinal fusion techniques that do not include all pedicle screw constructs.

Background: Progressive kyphosis occurs in up to 20% of patients with myelomeningocele. Severely affected patients can develop recurrent skin breakdown, osteomyelitis, sitting imbalance, and poor cosmetic appearance. Questions/purposes: We (1) assessed the ability of kyphectomy to restore an intact skin envelope and allow comfortable seating in a wheelchair; (2) reviewed the complications of kyphectomy and spinal fusion in myelomeningocele; and (3) determined whether patients requiring unexpected reoperation had worse correction or more ulceration compared with those patients treated with a single surgery. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 23 children with thoracic-level myelomeningocele who were treated with kyphectomy and spinal fusion since 1980. Indications for surgery included recurrent skin breakdown (15 patients) and poor sitting balance or unacceptable cosmetic deformity (three patients). We evaluated operative technique, type of sacropelvic fixation, surgical complications, radiographic correction, and skin condition at followup. The minimum followup was 2 years (median, 4.1 years; range, 2.1-10 years); 18 of the 23 children had greater than 2 years followup and are reported here. Results: Kyphectomy achieved a sitting balance and resolved in skin ulceration in 17 of 18 patients. Seven patients had complications requiring reoperation. Three patients had multiple reoperations for early deep infection and one patient each had reoperation for late infection, pseudarthrosis, implant-related sacral pressure sore, and planned extension of proximal fusion after growth. Patients requiring multiple operations had similar correction and relief of ulceration to those treated with a single procedure. Conclusions: Complications after kyphectomy are frequent and many children with myelomeningocele and severe hyperkyphosis require multiple procedures and lengthy hospital stays. Nonetheless, improved seating balance and resolution of skin problems was achieved in 17 of 18 patients. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]