Search

Background: Applied Research Associates (ARA) and the United States Army Institute of Surgical Research (USAISR) have been developing a tablet-based simulation environment for burn wound assessment and burn shock resuscitation. This application aims to supplement the current gold standard in burn care education, the Advanced Burn Life Support (ABLS) curriculum., Results: Subject matter experts validate total body surface area (TBSA) identification and analysis and show that the visual fidelity of the tablet virtual patients is consistent with real life thermal injuries. We show this by noting that the error between their burn mapping and the actual patient burns was sufficiently less than that of a random sample population. Statistical analysis is used to confirm this hypothesis. In addition a full body physiology model developed for this project is detailed. Physiological results, and responses to standard care treatment, are detailed and validated. Future updates will include training modules that leverage this model., Conclusion: We have created an accurate, whole-body model of burn TBSA training experience in Unreal 4 on a mobile platform, provided for free to the medical community. We hope to provide learners with more a realistic experience and with rapid feedback as they practice patient assessment, intervention, and reassessment.

The aim of this study was to investigate whether current standards at our institution have effectively monitored resuscitations of severely burned patients during the first 48 hours postburn. Demographics, injuries assessed by TBSA and full thickness (FT), and resuscitation volumes (lactated Ringer's [LR]) were compared for all patients and those who died or survived. Means and standard deviations of hourly indices (urinary output [UOP], lactate [LAC], base excess [BE]) vs LR were analyzed. Waveforms, four-quadrant concordance, and correlation were also employed to compare the trending abilities (hourly changes [∆]) of aforementioned variables vs LR. A total of 203 patients were included in the analysis. Of these patients, 71 (35%) died, and 50 (25%) had inhalation injuries. Mean age and weight were 47 ± 19 years and 87 ± 18 kg, respectively. Mean TBSA burned was 41 ± 20%, with a mean FT of 18 ± 24%. Importantly, normalized waveform plots demonstrated the inability of UO, LAC, and BE to follow hourly changes in LR. Correlation of these variables was weak (r>>-1). This was confirmed by concordance plots. Slopes in all groups demonstrated that UOP was a better resuscitative monitor than LAC or BE. ∆UOP responded to ∆LR better in patients who survived than died. Reliance on hourly UOP as the sole index of optimal resuscitation is not supported. This study echoed the call for better resuscitation indices.

Background: Optimal fluid resuscitation of burn patients with burns greater than 20% total body surface area is critical to prevent burn shock during the initial 24 hours to 48 hours postburn. Currently, most resuscitation formulas incorporate the patient's weight when estimating 24-hour fluid requirements. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of weight on fluid resuscitation requirements and outcomes during the initial 24 hours after admission., Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients admitted to our burn intensive care unit from December 2007 to April 2013, resuscitated with a computerized decision support system. We classified patients into body mass index (BMI) categories of underweight (BMI: <18.5), normal (BMI: 18.5-24.9), overweight (BMI: 25.0-29.9), or obese (BMI: >30.0). We also calculated the percent difference from ideal body weight (IBW) and compared 24-hour fluid volumes received., Results: Patients with missing weight and/or height values were excluded from the study, resulting in a final cohort of 161 patients for analysis. Mean total body surface area was 42 ± 20% with a full thickness burn of 18 ± 23%. Mean age, weight, and height were 47 ± 19 years, 83 ± 19 kg, and 68 ± 4 inches, respectively. IBW for this cohort was 68 ± 11 kg with a BMI of 28 ± 6. Univariate analysis showed significant differences in 24-hour resuscitation volumes (mL/kg) between normal and obese patients (p < 0.05). Further analysis revealed that increasing percent difference from IBW was associated with lower fluid volumes. Although obesity was not associated with inhalation injury or renal replacement therapy, it was correlated to an increased risk for mortality (p < 0.05)., Conclusion: This analysis showed that increasing weight was associated with lower fluid resuscitation volume requirements and a higher mortality rate, despite the low incidence of inhalation injury and renal replacement therapy in our obese patients. The use of actual body weight to drive resuscitation volumes may result in overresuscitation of obese patients, depending on the resuscitation formula. Further studies are needed to better explain the relationship between mortality and obesity in burn patients., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic/care management, level IV.

Critical care injuries, such as burn trauma, require specialized skillsets and knowledge. A clinical decision support system to aid clinicians in providing burn patient management can increase proficiency and provide knowledge content for specific interventions. In austere environments, decision support tools can be used to aid in decision making and task guidance when skilled personnel or resources are limited. Therefore, we developed a novel software system that utilizes augmented reality (AR) capabilities to provide enhanced step-by-step instructions based on best practices for managing burn patients. To better understand how new technologies, such as AR, can be used for burn care management, we developed a burn care application for use on a heads-up display. We developed four sub-set applications for documenting and conducting burn wound mapping, fluid resuscitation, medication calculations, and an escharotomy. After development, we conducted a usability study utilizing the System Usability Scale, pre- and post- simulation surveys, and after-action reviews to evaluate the AR-based software application in a simulation scenario. Results of the study indicate that the decision support tool has generalized usability and subjects were able to use the software as intended. Here we present the first use case of a comprehensive burn management system utilizing augmented reality capabilities to deliver care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Initial fluid infusion rates for resuscitation of burn injuries typically use formulas based on patient weight and total body surface area (TBSA) burned. However, the impact of this rate on overall resuscitation volumes and outcomes have not been extensively studied. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of initial fluid rates on 24-hour volumes and outcomes using the Burn Navigator (BN). The BN database is composed of 300 patients with ≥20% TBSA, >40 kg that were resuscitated utilizing the BN. Four study arms were analyzed based on the initial formula—2 ml/kg/TBSA, 3 ml/kg/TBSA, 4 ml/kg/TBSA or the Rule of Ten. Total fluids infused at 24 hours after admission were compared as well as resuscitation-related outcomes. A total of 296 patients were eligible for analysis. Higher starting rates (4 ml/kg/TBSA) resulted in significantly higher volumes at 24 hours (5.2 ± 2.2 ml/kg/TBSA) than lower rates (2 ml/kg/TBSA resulted in 3.9 ± 1.4 ml/kg/TBSA). No shock was observed in the high resuscitation cohort, whereas the lowest starting rate exhibited a 12% incidence, lower than both the Rule of Ten and 3 ml/kg/TBSA arms. There was no difference in 7-day mortality across groups. Higher initial fluid rates resulted in higher 24-hour fluid volumes. The choice of 2ml/kg/TBSA as initial rate did not result in increased mortality or more complications. An initial rate of 2ml/kg/TBSA is a safe strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mortality associated with burn injuries is declining with improved critical care. However, patients admitted with concurrent substance use have increased risk of complications and poor outcomes. The impact of alcohol and methamphetamine use on acute burn resuscitation has been described in single-center studies; however, has not been studied since implementation of computerized decision support for resuscitation. Patients were evaluated based presence of alcohol, with a minimum blood alcohol level of 0.10, or positive methamphetamines on urine drug screen. Fluid volumes and urine output were examined over 48 hours. A total of 296 patients were analyzed. 37 (12.5%) were positive for methamphetamine use, 50 (16.9%) were positive for alcohol use, and 209 (70.1%) with negative for both. Patients positive for methamphetamine received a mean of 5.30 ± 2.63 cc/kg/TBSA, patients positive for alcohol received a mean of 5.41 ± 2.49 cc/kg/TBSA, and patients with neither received a mean of 4.33 ± 1.79 cc/kg/TBSA. Patients with methamphetamine or alcohol use had significantly higher fluid requirements. In the first 6 hours patients with alcohol use had significantly higher urinary output (UO) in comparison to patients with methamphetamine use which had similar output to patients negative for both substances. This study demonstrated that patients with alcohol and methamphetamine use had statistically significantly greater fluid resuscitation requirements compared to patients without. The effects of alcohol as a diuretic align with previous literature. However, patients with methamphetamine lack the increased UO as a cause for their increased fluid requirements. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: In 2006, burn clinical practice guidelines were developed to provide recommendations for optimal care of U.S. military and local national burn casualties. As part of that effort, a paper-based Burn Flow Sheet (BFS) was included to document the burn resuscitation of combat casualties with ≥20% total body surface area burns. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the BFS in terms of ongoing utilization, resuscitation management, and outcomes of patients transported.Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was performed of hard-copy BFSs received from January 2007 to December 2013. En route injury and treatment data from these flowsheets were manually transcribed into the research database. Outcomes and complications of BFS subjects were extracted from the Burn Center Registry and added to the research database.Results: A total of 73 BFSs were collected from the study period. On average, BFSs were 61 ± 30% complete with a total of 14.7 ± 7 hours documented per patient in the first 24-hours postburn. Patients received nearly 7 L more fluid than estimated by traditional formulas. Sixteen patients (26%) received greater than 250 mL/kg of fluid, half of whom had concomitant traumatic injuries. Fifteen patients received a fasciotomy (21%), 4 received a laparotomy (5%), and 8 (11%) received both. No patients developed abdominal compartment syndrome associated with fluid resuscitation. Overall mortality was 21%.Conclusions: Although the majority of providers did initiate a BFS, it was not always used as intended; problems included missing data and miscalculations. Although there was a clear improvement with decline in the incidence of abdominal compartment syndrome, mortality did not change for severely burned patients. Simplification of the recommendations, additional built-in prompts, and automated tools such as computerized decision support software may help standardize practice and improve outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction The Burn Navigator (BN) is an FDA-cleared clinical decision support tool used to aid fluid resuscitation after major burn injury. The BN provides users with hourly recommendations for fluid titration during the initial resuscitation based on various factors. The objective of this multi-center observational study was to evaluate the resuscitation volumes and related outcomes of patients admitted to five ABA verified burn centers who underwent intravenous fluid resuscitation utilizing the BN. Methods Data was collected from 300 patients who were resuscitated utilizing the BN. Two analyses were performed: examination of the first 24 hours of resuscitation after burn injury and examination of 24 hours of resuscitation using the BN, regardless of when the resuscitation began, to account for patients who presented in a delayed fashion. Patients were classified as having followed the BN device if all hourly fluid rates were within 40 mL of the BN recommendations (20 mL above or below) for that hour at least 75% of the time. Results For 285 patients, average age, weight, and TBSA were 45.6 ± 16.8 years, 87.0 ± 22.8 kg, and 39.0 ± 17.8%, with partial/full thickness percentages of 22.2 ± 15.2% and 17.0 ± 19.7%, respectively. Analysis of 286 patients in the first 24 hours of resuscitation revealed an average of 4.07 ± 1.76 mL/kg/TBSA and 151.48 ± 77.46 mL/kg of primary crystalloid fluid. When considering all fluids administered to include colloids and medications, enteral and oral feeds, and oral resuscitation fluids, average volumes in the first 24 hours were 4.68 ± 2.06 mL/kg/TBSA and 175.01 ± 92.22 mL/kg. To account for delayed presentation after burn injury, examining 24 hours of resuscitation regardless of the initiation of resuscitation, average volumes for primary and total fluids were 5.28 ± 2.54 mL/kg/TBSA, 201.11 ± 106.53 mL/kg, 6.35 ± 2.95 mL/kg/TBSA and 244.08 ± 133.5 mL/kg respectively. There was a significant decrease incidence of shock in the BN-guided group versus the non-BN-guided group (p< 0.05). Conclusions The Burn Navigator provides comparable resuscitation volumes of primary crystalloid fluid to the Parkland Formula. When all fluids are considered, the BN device recommends total fluid infusion less than the Ivy Index (250 mL/kg/24 hrs) and was associated with a decreased incidence of shock. Early initiation of the BN device resulted in lower overall fluid volumes during the first 24 hours of resuscitation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Management of wartime burn casualties can be very challenging. Burns frequently occur in the setting of other blunt and penetrating injuries. This clinical practice guideline provides a manual for burn injury assessment, resuscitation, wound care, and specific scenarios including chemical and electrical injuries in the deployed or austere setting. The clinical practice guideline also reviews considerations for the definitive care of local national patients, including pediatric patients, who are unable to be evacuated from theater. Medical providers are encouraged to contact the US Army Institute of Surgical Research (USAISR) Burn Center when caring for a burn casualty in the deployed setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article analyzes the effectiveness of a computerized open-loop decision support system used to provide resuscitation to burned patients. According to the authors, using the computer decision support system in an intensive care setting resulted in fluid management improvements among severely burned patients. They reveal that all measures of crystalloid fluid volume were reduced, leading them to conclude that the addition of the computer system helped improve patient care.