Search

Quantification of the cardiorespiratory and cerebrovascular couplings is a relevant clinical issue given that their changes are considered signs of pathological status. The inherent nonlinearity of mechanisms underlying cardiorespiratory and cerebrovascular links requires nonlinear tools for their reliable evaluation. In the present study we compare two nonlinear methods for the assessment of coupling strength between two time series, namely cross-sample entropy (CSampEn) and k-nearest-neighbor cross-predictability (KNNCP). CSampEn uses a strategy that fixes the pattern length, while KNNCP optimizes the pattern length to maximize cross-predictability. CSampEn and KNNCP were applied to the beat-to-beat series of heart period (HP) and respiration (R) during a controlled breathing protocol with the aim at assessing cardiorespiratory coupling and to the beat-to-beat series of mean cerebral blood flow (MCBF) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) during an orthostatic stressor with the aim at evaluating cerebrovascular coupling. Although both the methods have the possibility to quantify the degree of HP-R and MCBF-MAP association, they exhibited different statistical power and even diverse trends in response to the considered physiological challenges. CSampEn and KNNCP are not interchangeable and should be utilized in association more than in alternative for the quantification of the HP-R and MCBF-MAP coupling strength. Clinical Relevance - This study proves that cross-entropy and cross-predictability might lead to different conclusions about cardiorespiratory and cerebrovascular couplings.

Nonlinear markers of coupling strength are often utilized to typify cardiorespiratory and cerebrovascular regulations. The computation of these indices requires techniques describing nonlinear interactions between respiration (R) and heart period (HP) and between mean arterial pressure (MAP) and mean cerebral blood velocity (MCBv). We compared two model-free methods for the assessment of dynamic HP–R and MCBv–MAP interactions, namely the cross-sample entropy (CSampEn) and k-nearest-neighbor cross-unpredictability (KNNCUP). Comparison was carried out first over simulations generated by linear and nonlinear unidirectional causal, bidirectional linear causal, and lag-zero linear noncausal models, and then over experimental data acquired from 19 subjects at supine rest during spontaneous breathing and controlled respiration at 10, 15, and 20 b r e a t h s · m i n u t e − 1 as well as from 13 subjects at supine rest and during 60° head-up tilt. Linear markers were computed for comparison. We found that: (i) over simulations, CSampEn and KNNCUP exhibit different abilities in evaluating coupling strength; (ii) KNNCUP is more reliable than CSampEn when interactions occur according to a causal structure, while performances are similar in noncausal models; (iii) in healthy subjects, KNNCUP is more powerful in characterizing cardiorespiratory and cerebrovascular variability interactions than CSampEn and linear markers. We recommend KNNCUP for quantifying cardiorespiratory and cerebrovascular coupling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Respiration disturbs cardiovascular and cerebrovascular controls but its role is not fully elucidated. Methods: Respiration can be classified as a confounder if its observation reduces the strength of the causal relationship from source to target. Respiration is a suppressor if the opposite situation holds. We prove that a confounding/suppression (C/S) test can be accomplished by evaluating the sign of net redundancy/synergy balance in the predictability framework based on multivariate autoregressive modelling. In addition, we suggest that, under the hypothesis of Gaussian processes, the C/S test can be given in the transfer entropy decomposition framework as well. Experimental protocols: We applied the C/S test to variability series of respiratory movements, heart period, systolic arterial pressure, mean arterial pressure, and mean cerebral blood flow recorded in 17 pathological individuals (age: 64±8 yrs; 17 males) before and after induction of propofol-based general anesthesia prior to coronary artery bypass grafting, and in 13 healthy subjects (age: 27±8 yrs; 5 males) at rest in supine position and during head-up tilt with a table inclination of 60°. Results: Respiration behaved systematically as a confounder for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular controls. In addition, its role was affected by propofol-based general anesthesia but not by a postural stimulus of limited intensity. Conclusion: The C/S test can be fruitfully exploited to categorize the role of respiration over causal variability interactions. Significance: The application of the C/S test could favor the comprehension of the role of respiration in cardiovascular and cerebrovascular regulations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]