Search

Aim: To quantify the impact of involving caregivers in self‐management interventions on health‐related quality of life of patients with heart failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Design: Systematic review, meta‐analysis. Data sources: Searched: Medline Ebsco, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science, The British Library and ProQuest. Search time frame; January 1990–March 2018. Review Methods: Randomized controlled trials involving caregivers in self‐management interventions (≥2 components) compared with usual care for patients with heart failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A matched sample based on publication year, geographic location and inclusion of an exercise intervention of studies not involving caregivers were identified. Primary outcome of analysis was patient health‐related quality of life. Results: Thirteen randomized controlled trials (1,701 participants: 1,439 heart failure; 262 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) involving caregivers (mean age 59; 58% female) were identified. Reported patient health‐related quality of life measures included; Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire, St. George's respiratory questionnaire and Short‐Form‐36. Compared with usual care, there was similar magnitude in mean improvement in patient health‐related quality of life with self‐management interventions in trials involving caregivers (SMD: 0.23, 95% confidence interval: −0.15–0.61) compared with trials without caregivers (SMD: 0.27, 0.08–0.46). Conclusion: Within the methodological constraints of this study, our results indicate that involving caregivers in self‐management interventions does not result in additional improvement in patient health‐related quality of life in heart failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However, involvement of caregivers in intervention delivery remains an important consideration and key area of research. Impact: Greater understanding and awareness is needed of the methodology of caregiver engagement in intervention development and delivery and its impact on patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Caregivers frequently provide support to people living with long-term conditions. However, there is paucity of evidence of interventions that support caregivers in their role. Rehabilitation EnAblement in Chronic Heart Failure (REACH-HF) is a novel home-based, health-professional-facilitated, self-management programme for patients with heart failure (HF) and their caregivers. Methods: Based on the random allocation of individual adult patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and left ventricular ejection fraction <45% within the past five years, the caregiver of patients was allocated to receive the REACH-HF intervention over 12 weeks (REACH-HF group) or not (control group). Caregiver outcomes were generic health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), Family Caregiver Quality of Life Scale questionnaire (FamQol), Caregiver Burden Questionnaire HF (CBQ-HF), Caregiver Contribution to Self-care of HF Index questionnaire (CC-SCHFI) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Outcomes were compared between groups at 4, 6 and 12 months follow-up. Twenty caregivers receiving REACH-HF were purposively selected for qualitative interviews at 4 and 12 months. Results: Compared with controls (44 caregivers), the REACH-HF group (53 caregivers) had a higher mean CC-SCHFI confidence score at 12 months (57.5 vs 62.8, adjusted mean difference: 9.3, 95% confidence interval: 1.8–16.8, p = 0.016). No significant between group differences were seen in other caregiver outcomes. Qualitative interviews showed that most caregivers who received the REACH-HF intervention made positive changes to how they supported the HF patient they were caring for, and perceived that they had increased their confidence in the caregiver role over time. Conclusion: Provision of the REACH-HF intervention for caregivers of HF patients improved their confidence of self-management and was perceived for some to be helpful in supporting their caregiver role. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The Trial of Wii™ in Stroke investigated the efficacy of using the Nintendo Wii Sports™ (Wii™) to improve affected arm function after stroke. Design: Multicentre, pragmatic, parallel group, randomized controlled trial. Setting: Home-based rehabilitation. Subjects: A total of 240 participants aged 24-90 years with arm weakness following a stroke within the previous six months. Intervention: Participants were randomly assigned to exercise daily for six weeks using the Wii™ or arm exercises at home. Main measures: Primary outcome was change in the affected arm function at six weeks follow-up using the Action Research Arm Test. Secondary outcomes included occupational performance, quality of life, arm function at six months and a cost effectiveness analysis. Results: The study was completed by 209 participants (87.1%). There was no significant difference in the primary outcome of affected arm function at six weeks follow-up (mean difference -1.7, 95% CI -3.9 to 0.5, p = 0.12) and no significant difference in secondary outcomes, including occupational performance, quality of life or arm function at six months, between the two groups. No serious adverse events related to the study treatment were reported. The cost effectiveness analysis showed that the Wii™ was more expensive than arm exercises £1106 (SD 1656) vs. £730 (SD 829) (probability 0.866). Conclusion: The trial showed that the Wii™ was not superior to arm exercises in home-based rehabilitation for stroke survivors with arm weakness. The Wii™ was well tolerated but more expensive than arm exercises. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article reports on research which was conducted to create and evaluate a model of heart failure patients’ attitudes, beliefs, expectations, and experiences based on research that could influence the development of self management strategies. Using meta-ethnography researchers conducted a review of 19 studies. After conducting the review researchers were able to develop a conceptual model of the attitudes, beliefs, and expectations of patients with heart failure which was capable of assessing the interplaying factors that led to self management strategies.

Objective To determine the preferred means by which participants in a study of cardiac rehabilitation wish to be informed of the study’s results. Design Postal questionnaire survey of participants in a randomized controlled trial. Setting Cornwall, southwest England. Participants Patients recruited to the Cornwall Heart Attack Rehabilitation Management Study (CHARMS). Method Participants recruited to CHARMS who were alive 3 years and 9 months after the trial was completed were contacted by letter and invited to return a reply slip with four short questions indicating how they would prefer to be informed about the published results of the study. Results In March 2008, 191/230 participants originally recruited to CHARMS were still alive. General practitioners deemed 166/191 (88%) survivors medically appropriate to be contacted through a postal survey, and 154/166 (93%) participants responded to the invitation to participate in the follow-up survey. 86% (143/166) of participants indicated that they wished to be informed about the results: 115 (80%) of these elected to receive information by letter and 25 (18%) of these preferred to attend a meeting. Men older than 65 years predominated in this latter group. Women respondents preferred to receive the study results by letter; none preferred communication by email or the web. Conclusion Survivors of acute myocardial infarction who participated in a RCT of cardiac rehabilitation wanted to receive a summary of the aggregate study results. Participants had preferences regarding how they would wish to be informed about the results of the study. Most participants preferred to be informed by letter or email, but some preferred the interaction of a group or a meeting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]