Search

Purpose: The aim of this work is to evaluate the anatomical changes of the glandular structures during the NPC IMRT and to study their dosimetric impacts., Patients and Methods: Twenty patients receiving IMRT for NPC were included. For each patient, a second dosimetric CT was performed at a dose of 38Gy, which was fused with the initial planning dosimetric CT. We calculated the volume percent change, the positional and dosimetric variation between the 2 scanners for the glandular structures (parotid, submaxillary, thyroid and pituitary)., Results: We observed a decrease in the volume of right and left parotids (-27.9% and -27.54%). It was correlated with the initial dose planned at its level. For the sub maxillary glands, the decrease was -36.1% on the right and -27.28% on the left. The value of reduction of the thyroid gland was -18.01%. A medial supra-millimeter migration of 2 and 1.15mm was found for right and left parotid glands respectively, correlated with GTV N reduction volume. We found a significant increase in mean doses for the parotid glands. It was 1.8±2.3Gy for the right and 1.5±2.7Gy for the left. For the right sub maxillary gland, the increase was about 0.35±2Gy and 3.79±5.2Gy for the thyroid., Conclusion: The modifications observed for glandular structures during NPC IMRT can explain the different toxicities caused by radiation. It seems also that a careful adaptation of the treatment plan should be considered during therapy., (Copyright © 2020 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To benchmark and improve, through means of a targeted intervention, the quality of intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment planning for locally advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) in the Netherlands. The short and long-term impact of this intervention was assessed., Methods and Materials: A delineated computed tomography-scan of an oropharynx HNC case was sent to all 15 Dutch radiation therapy centers treating HNC. Aims for planning target volume and organ-at-risk (OAR) dosimetry were established by consensus. Each center generated a treatment plan. In a targeted intervention, OAR sparing of all plans was discussed, and centers with the best OAR sparing shared their planning strategies. Impact of the intervention was assessed by (1) short-term (half a year after intervention) replanning of the original case and (2) long-term (1 and 3 years after intervention) planning of new cases., Results: Benchmarking revealed substantial difference in OAR doses. Initial mean doses were 22 Gy (range, 15-31 Gy), 35 Gy (18-49 Gy), and 37 Gy (20-46 Gy) for the contralateral parotid gland, contralateral submandibular gland, and combined swallowing structures, respectively. Replanning after targeted intervention significantly reduced mean doses and variation, but clinically relevant differences still remained: 18 Gy (14-22 Gy), 28 Gy (17-45 Gy), and 29 Gy (18-39 Gy), respectively. One and 3 years later the variation remained stable., Conclusions: Despite many years of HNC intensity modulated radiation therapy experience, initial treatment plans showed surprisingly large variations. The simple targeted intervention used in this analysis improved OAR sparing, and its impact was durable; however, fairly large dose differences still continue to exist. Additional work is needed to understand these variations and to minimize them. A national radiation oncology platform can be instrumental for developing and maintaining high-quality planning protocols., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To analyze baseline CT/MR-based image features of salivary glands to predict radiation-induced xerostomia 3-months after head-and-neck cancer (HNC) radiotherapy., Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 266 HNC patients who were treated using radiotherapy at our institution between 2009 and 2018. CT and T1 post-contrast MR images along with NCI-CTCAE xerostomia grade (3-month follow-up) were prospectively collected at our institution. CT and MR images were registered on which parotid/submandibular glands were contoured. Image features were extracted for ipsilateral/contralateral parotid and submandibular glands relative to the location of the primary tumor. Dose-volume-histogram (DVH) parameters were also acquired. Features were pre-selected based on Spearman correlation before modelling by examining the correlation with xerostomia (p < 0.05). A shrinkage regression analysis of the pre-selected features was performed using LASSO. The internal validity of the variable selection was estimated by repeating the entire variable selection procedure using a leave-one-out-cross-validation. The most frequently selected variables were considered in the final model. A generalized linear regression with repeated ten-fold cross-validation was developed to predict radiation-induced xerostomia at 3-months after radiotherapy. This model was tested in an independent dataset (n = 50) of patients who were treated at the same institution in 2017-2018. We compared the prediction performances under eight conditions (DVH-only, CT-only, MR-only, CT + MR, DVH + CT, DVH + CT + MR, Clinical+CT + MR, and Clinical+DVH + CT + MR) using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC)., Results: Among extracted features, 7 CT, 5 MR, and 2 DVH features were selected. The internal cohort (n = 216) ROC-AUC values for DVH, CT, MR, and Clinical+DVH + CT + MR features were 0.73 ± 0.01, 0.69 ± 0.01, 0.70 ± 0.01, and 0.79 ± 0.01, respectively. The validation cohort (n = 50) ROC-AUC values for DVH, CT, MR, and Clinical+DVH + CT + MR features were 0.63, 0.57, 0.66, and 0.68, respectively. The DVH-ROC was not significantly different than the CT-ROC (p = 0.8) or MR-ROC (p = 0.4). However, the CT + MR-ROC was significantly different than the CT-ROC (p = 0.03), but not the Clinical+DVH + CT + MR model (p = 0.5)., Conclusion: Our results suggest that baseline CT and MR image features may reflect baseline salivary gland function and potential risk for radiation injury. The integration of baseline image features into prediction models has the potential to improve xerostomia risk stratification with the ultimate goal of truly personalized HNC radiotherapy.

Purpose: Clinical data collection and development of outcome prediction models by machine learning can form the foundation for a learning health system offering precision radiation therapy. However, changes in clinical practice over time can affect the measures and patient outcomes and, hence, the collected data. We hypothesize that regular prediction model updates and continuous prospective data collection are important to prevent the degradation of a model's predication accuracy., Methods and Materials: Clinical and dosimetric data from head and neck patients receiving intensity modulated radiation therapy from 2008 to 2015 were prospectively collected as a routine clinical workflow and anonymized for this analysis. Prediction models for grade ≥2 xerostomia at 3 to 6 months of follow-up were developed by bivariate logistic regression using the dose-volume histogram of parotid and submandibular glands. A baseline prediction model was developed with a training data set from 2008 to 2009. The selected predictor variables and coefficients were updated by 4 different model updating methods. (A) The prediction model was updated by using only recent 2-year data and applied to patients in the following test year. (B) The model was updated by increasing the training data set yearly. (C) The model was updated by increasing the training data set on the condition that the area under the curve (AUC) of the recent test year was less than 0.6. (D) The model was not updated. The AUC of the test data set was compared among the 4 model updating methods., Results: Dose to parotid and submandibular glands and grade of xerostomia showed decreasing trends over the years (2008-2015, 297 patients; P < .001). The AUC of predicting grade ≥2 xerostomia for the initial training data set (2008-2009, 41 patients) was 0.6196. The AUC for the test data set (2010-2015, 256 patients) decreased to 0.5284 when the initial model was not updated (D). However, the AUC was significantly improved by model updates (A: 0.6164; B: 0.6084; P < .05). When the model was conditionally updated, the AUC was 0.6072 (C)., Conclusions: Our preliminary results demonstrate that updating prediction models with prospective data collection is effective for maintaining the performance of xerostomia prediction. This suggests that a machine learning framework can handle the dynamic changes in a radiation oncology clinical practice and may be an important component for the construction of a learning health system., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Submandibular gland (SMG) metastases are extremely rare in head and neck cancer, even in the presence of level Ib lymph node (LN) involvement. In recent years, we have contoured the SMG and specifically attempted to limit its dose exposure even in patients in whom the level Ib LN station is targeted. This study reports our preliminary feasibility and safety experience with selective submandibular gland sparing., Methods: Patients with squamous cell cancer (SCC) of the oral cavity or oropharynx with T1-2, N0-3, M0 disease in whom at least a single level Ib lymph node region was included in the target volume were identified. All patients were treated from 2009 to 2014 with definitive or postoperative IMRT with or without chemotherapy. Patients with recurrent disease, previous radiation or treated palliatively were excluded., Results: A total of 174 patients met criteria for inclusion. Among the 185 level Ib LN stations that were deliberately targeted in the clinical treatment volume, 32 submandibular glands were contoured, excluded from the target volume and avoided during treatment planning. Mean dose to the spared SMG were reduced by 12% (66.6 Gy vs. 58.9 Gy, p < .001). None of these patients experienced any level 1b LN failures., Conclusion: Selective sparing of the submandibular gland when targeting the level 1b nodes in oral cavity and oropharynx cancer is feasible, reduces the mean dose to submandibular glands and does not result in increased level 1b nodal failure rates. Additional studies with larger cohorts are needed to validate this preliminary observation., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To estimate the dose response relationship for submandibular gland (SMG) recovery using salivary scintigraphy in patients diagnosed with head and neck cancer treated with curative image guided chemoradiation., Material and Methods: Ninety newly diagnosed head and neck cancer patients (T1-3, N0-2c, M0) treated with intensity modulated radiotherapy on a prospective clinical trial were assessed for salivary toxicity at predefined intervals using dynamic salivary scintigraphy. The SMG function was measured using salivary excretion fraction (SEF) ratios at baseline and 6 monthly. Tolerance dose (TD) 50 for submandibular gland was estimated from dose response curves., Results: The mean SEF ratio of 180 SMGs decreased at 6 months with a nadir at 12 months after treatment (SEF ratio 15%) and progressively recovered over time reaching 38% over 24 months. There was significant inverse correlation between SEF ratio and mean SMG dose at 6 months (r = -0.18, p = 0.04); 12-months (r = -0.36, p < 0.001); 18-months (r = -0.48, p < 0.001); 24-months (r = -0.42, p < 0.001); and more than 24-months (r = -0.56, p < 0.001). The estimated TD 50 values at 1 year and 2 year post treatment were 36 Gy and 44 Gy respectively with SEF ratio of ≤45% used to define severe xerostomia. For every 1 Gy reduction in mean dose below 54 Gy, there is 2-2.5% reduction in the probability of severe xerostomia., Conclusion: The submandibular gland function declines after radiotherapy with a nadir at 12 months and there is incomplete recovery over time with continued improvement over 24 months. The TD 50 at 1 year and 2 year was 36 Gy and 44 Gy with a 2-2.5% reduction in the probability of severe xerostomia for every 1 Gy reduction in mean dose., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: To evaluate changes in xerostomia status, salivary characteristics and gland volumes 2 years following radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients., Methods: Xerostomia scores, salivary flow rates, pH and buffering capacity were measured at pre-radiotherapy, mid-radiotherapy, 2 weeks, 3 months and 2 years post-radiotherapy. Salivary gland volumes and their correlation with radiation dose were also assessed., Results: Mean radiation dose to oral cavity, parotid and submandibular glands (SMG) was 44.5, 65.0 and 38.6 Gy respectively. Parotid and SMG volumes decreased 33% at 3 months post-radiotherapy; volumes at 2 years post-radiotherapy were 84% and 51% of pre-radiotherapy levels, respectively. Correlations were observed between parotid gland volume per cent reduction and its radiation dose and between resting salivary flow rate reduction and post-radiotherapy/pre-radiotherapy SMG volume ratio. Salivary flow rates and resting saliva pH remained significantly low at 2 years post-radiotherapy (both flow rates, P = 0.001; resting saliva pH, P = 0.005). Similarly, xerostomia scores remained significantly higher compared with pre-radiotherapy levels., Conclusions: Submandibular gland volumetric shrinkage persisted 2 years after radiotherapy. Xerostomia scores remained significantly higher, and salivary flow rates and resting saliva pH remained significantly lower, suggesting that study participants were still at risk for hyposalivation-related oral diseases., (© 2018 Australian Dental Association.)

Introduction: Recent studies have suggested reducing the dose submandibular glands receive when patients undergo head and neck radiotherapy can play a crucial role in preventing xerostomia. However, they are traditionally not spared due to concern that target coverage may be compromised. We investigated the possibility of sparing the contralateral submandibular gland (cSM) by utilising modern planning techniques., Methods: 10 head and neck patients previously treated with conformal therapy at our centre were retrospectively planned using intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Each patient was prescribed 70 Gy in 35 fractions to the primary volume, with 56 Gy delivered to the elective nodal areas. The primary objective was to spare the cSM gland using appropriate dose constraints., Results: Mean dose to the cSM gland was reduced to an acceptable dose level (39 Gy) for all patients replanned using an IMRT or VMAT technique, without compromising planned target volume (PTV) coverage or other critical structures. VMAT was able to reduce the mean dose to 31.5 ± 5.5 Gy compared to 34.5 ± 4.8 Gy of IMRT and offered improved plan conformity., Conclusion: Sparing the cSM gland is possible using IMRT and VMAT planning, whilst preserving coverage on the elective PTV. This has produced a change in protocol in our department, more focus placed on sparing the SM glands. VMAT is a viable alternative method of delivering treatment and will be utilised when required., (© 2017 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology.)

Background: Radiation therapy-related dysphagia is worsened by xerostomia. The submandibular glands (SMG) produce saliva rich in lubricating mucins, and sparing the SMG has been shown to reduce xerostomia. The goal of this study was to determine whether SMG sparing IMRT is associated with reduced post-treatment PEG dependence in locally advanced oropharynx cancer patients., Methods: Patients treated with definitive radiation therapy for oropharynx cancer were included in this retrospective study. Those with disease recurrence were excluded. Salivary glands and swallowing-related organs at risk, including pharyngeal constrictors, were contoured. Primary endpoint was time from end of radiation treatment to freedom from gastrostomy (PEG) tube dependence. Cox proportional hazards regression and logistic regression were used to assess influence of normal tissue doses on swallowing related endpoints., Results: Sixty-nine patients were included. All had stage III/IV disease and 97% received concurrent systemic therapy. Fifty-seven percent had contralateral SMG (cSMG) mean dose <50 Gy, a level shown to predict for xerostomia. Eighty four percent of patients had a PEG tube placed electively. On univariate analysis, the strongest predictor of time to freedom from PEG tube dependence was cSMG dose (HR 0.97 per Gy (95% CI 0.95-0.98), p < 0.0001). This relationship persisted on multivariate analysis (p = 0.052). The dose to superior and middle pharyngeal constrictor muscles, and larynx were also significant on univariate analysis. Patients with cSMG dose less than median (42 Gy, n = 34) had a significantly shorter time to freedom from PEG dependence: median 1.9 vs. 3.5 months, p < 0.0001. At 6 months, 3% of patients with cSMG dose < 42 Gy were PEG dependent compared to 31% with cSMG dose > 42 Gy (p = 0.002)., Conclusions: Patients treated with cSMG sparing radiotherapy had significantly shorter time to PEG tube removal after treatment, suggesting a clinically meaningful reduction in subacute dysphagia compared to non-cSMG sparing treatment.

Background: Previous groups have shown contralateral submandibular gland sparing to improve xerostomia with safe outcomes, but primarily in early-stage disease. In this study, we present a large cohort of patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer that underwent contralateral submandibular gland-sparing radiotherapy, to demonstrate feasibility and safety specifically in patients with locally advanced disease., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who were treated prospectively with contralateral submandibular gland sparing. Only patients who underwent bilateral neck radiotherapy with contralateral submandibular gland doses <39 Gy were included., Results: We identified 71 patients. Approximately 80% of patients had ≥N2b disease. The contralateral submandibular gland mean dose was 33 Gy and, at a median follow-up of 27.3 months, no patients experienced treatment failure in the contralateral level IB lymph nodes., Conclusion: Xerostomia remains a significant morbidity despite parotid sparing and can be minimized further by contralateral submandibular gland sparing. These data provide important preliminary evidence that contralateral submandibular gland sparing is feasible and may be safe even in locally advanced cancers., (© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Objective: To evaluate the dynamic change of salivary gland function in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) before and after intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) by DWMRI., Methods: Twenty-three NPC patients confirmed by pathology were enrolled. Male/Female: 19/4. The age was from 37 to 69 years. All cases underwent salivary glands examination by DWMRI before IMRT, at the end of IMRT, 6 months and 12 months after IMRT, at the same time the ADC value of salivary glands were calculated. The patients were divided into two groups: G1, Dmean < 26 Gy, G2, Dmean ≥ 26 Gy. SPSS 13.0 and SAS 8.2 software was used to analyze the date., Results: The ADC values of parotid in two group patients at rest were not significantly different between 6 months after and at the end of IMRT (t value was 0.732, 1.405, all P > 0.05). The ADC values of parotid in two group patients at rest were significantly lower in the 12 months after IMRT than at the end of IMRT (t value 2.621, 3.417, all P < 0.05). During the period of acid stimulation, A significant change of ADC in parotid was found in G1 (all P < 0.05) and no significant change of ADC in parotid was found in G2 at the various follow-up time after IMRT (all P > 0.05). At the various follow-up time after IMRT, the average ADC values of parotid were significantly higher in G2 than G1 in the same time points of acid stimulation (all P < 0.05). The ADC values of submandibular glands at rest were significantly higher at the various follow-up time after IMRT than before IMRT (t value was -9.782, -8.963, -7.722, all P < 0.05). During the period of acid stimulation no significant change of ADC in submandibular glands was found after IMRT (F = 1.124, P = -0.348)., Conclusions: The changes of salivary function can be well reflected by ADC values. There is a good clinical application value of DWMRI for evaluating radiation-induced salivary glands functional changes and observing salivary function recovery during the follow-up period after IMRT.

Background: Saliva from submandibular glands (SMG) is necessary to minimize xerostomia. It is unclear whether SMG can be safely spared in patients undergoing bilateral neck radiotherapy for locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer without increasing the risk of marginal recurrence. We evaluated the outcomes of contralateral submandibular gland (cSMG) sparing intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)., Methods: All patients with stage III/IV oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with bilateral neck IMRT from 2006-2012 at our institution were included. Appropriately selected patients with favorable primary tumor characteristics and no definite contralateral neck disease were treated with cSMG-sparing IMRT. Patterns of failure and xerostomia outcomes were retrospectively analyzed., Results: 114 patients were treated. 89% had stage IV disease and 89% received definitive radiation therapy. 76 patients (67%) received cSMG sparing IMRT. With a median follow-up of 30 months, there were 10 local, 9 regional, and 10 distant recurrences. 2-year overall survival was 86% and 2-year loco-regional control was 87%. In cSMG spared patients, the mean cSMG dose was 30.7 Gy. Late grade 2+ xerostomia was significantly reduced in the cSMG spared group compared to those without SMG sparing (6 months: 23% vs. 72%, 12 months: 6% vs. 41%, 24 months: 3% vs. 36%, all p < 0.0007). There were no peri-SMG marginal recurrences in the cSMG-spared cohort., Conclusions: cSMG sparing IMRT did not increase marginal failures in this series of locally advanced oropharyngeal SCC patients. Xerostomia was significantly reduced in cSMG spared patients.

Xerostomia is one of the most debilitating late effects of head and neck radiotherapy (RT) and significantly impacts quality of life. The submandibular gland (SMG) provides approximately 70% of the unstimulated saliva that accounts for about 95% of the salivary flow during a 24-hour period. Intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) has been used in recent years to lower the RT dose to the parotid gland(s) to reduce long-term xerostomia. There is little experience with SMG-sparing IMRT. Mean RT doses to the SMG exceeding 39 Gy cause permanent ablation of both stimulated and unstimulated salivary flow. Limited data suggest that SMG-sparing IMRT in selected patients results in reduced long-term xerostomia without increasing the risk of a local-regional recurrence.

Objective: This study evaluated and quantified the feasibility of submandibular gland (SMG) sparing in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for N0-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC)., Methods: Ten patients with N0-stage NPC were enrolled in the study. Four IMRT plans were produced for each, with different limiting conditions. In plan A, SMG sparing was ignored; in plans B, C and D, the mean dose to SMGs was restricted to 39 Gy. In addition, at least 95% of planning target volume (PTV)-IIa (PTV of clinical target volume involving level IIa lymph node) in plan C and 90% of PTV-IIa in plan D were required to have a 60 Gy covering., Results: The average mean dose to SMGs was 54.6 ± 3.6 Gy in plan A and was lower 39.3 ± 0.3, 49.3 ± 1.9 and 46.7 ± 2.8 Gy in plans B, C and D, respectively. The volume of PTV-IIa covered by 60 Gy was 98.9%, 81.6%, 95.2% and 90.8% in plans A, B, C and D, respectively, and showed a parallel association between dose reduction to SMGs and the covering deficit of PTV-IIa., Conclusion: Reducing the mean dose received by SMG to 39 Gy or less in IMRT for N0-stage NPC is feasible.

Background: The intraoral stent is a mouth-opening device which may be used during head and neck cancer radiotherapy with the intention of preventing unnecessary irradiation in normal adjacent tissue. The use of this device during intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has not been reported in the literature., Methods: A 30-year-old woman with squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue was submitted to a CT for IMRT treatment planning with and without the use of the intraoral stent., Results: Dosimetric analysis showed that the irradiation dose to the maxilla, both parotid glands, and left submandibular gland decreased with the use of this device., Conclusion: This article shows that intraoral stents seem to be useful in decreasing the radiation dose to healthy structures, especially in bone structures and salivary glands during radiotherapy, and emphasizes the importance of a multidisciplinary team during oncological therapy., (Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Objective: We investigated salivary function using quantitative scintigraphy and sought to identify functional correlations between parotid dose and quality of life (QoL) for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)., Materials and Methods: Between August, 2007 and June, 2008, 31 patients treated IMRT for HNC were enrolled in this prospective study. Salivary excretion function (SEF) was previously measured by salivary scintigraphy at annual intervals for 2 years after IMRT. A dose-volume histogram of each parotid gland was calculated, and the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) was used to determine the tolerance dose. QoL was longitudinally assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30 and H&N35 questionnaires prior to RT, and at one, three, 12 and 24 months after RT., Results: A significant correlation was found between the reduction of SEF and the mean parotid dose measured at 1 year (correlation coefficient, R(2)=0.651) and 2 years (R(2)=0.310) after IMRT (p<0.001). The TD(50) of the parotid gland at 1 year after IMRT is 43.6 Gy, comparable to results from western countries. We further found that contralateral parotid and submandibular gland function preservation was correlated with reduced sticky saliva and a better QoL compared to the functional preservation of both parotid glands, as determined by the EORTC QLQ-H&N35 questionnaire., Conclusion: A significant correlation was found between the reduction of SEF and the mean parotid dose. Preservation of contralateral parotid and submandibular gland function predicts a better QoL compared to preservation of the function of both parotid glands., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To evaluate the variability of organ at risk (OAR) delineation and the resulting impact on intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment plan optimization in head-and-neck cancer., Methods and Materials: An expert panel of 3 radiation oncologists jointly delineated OARs, including the parotid and submandibular glands (SM), pharyngeal constrictors (PC), larynx, and glottis (GL), in 10 patients with advanced oropharynx cancer in 3 contouring sessions, spaced at least 1 week apart. Contour variability and uncertainty, as well as their dosimetric impact on IMRT planning for each case, were assessed., Results: The mean difference in total volume for each OAR was 1 cm(3) (σ 0.5 cm(3)). Mean fractional overlap was 0.7 (σ 0.1) and was highest (0.8) for the larynx and bilateral SMs and parotids and lowest (0.5) for PC. There were considerable spatial differences in contours, with the ipsilateral parotid and PC displaying the most variability (0.9 cm), which was most prominent in cases in which tumors obliterated fat planes. Both SMs and GL had the smallest differences (0.5 cm). The mean difference in OAR dose was 0.9 Gy (range 0.6-1.1 Gy, σ 0.1 Gy), with the smallest difference for GL and largest for both SMs and the larynx., Conclusions: Despite substantial difference in OAR contours, optimization was barely affected, with a 0.9-Gy mean difference between optimizations, suggesting relative insensitivity of dose distributions for IMRT of oropharynx cancer to the extent of OARs., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To quantify improved salivary gland sparing for head and neck cancer patients using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans based on integrated computerized optimization of beam orientations and intensity profiles. To assess if optimized nonzero couch angles also improve VMAT plans., Methods: Our in-house developed algorithm iCycle was used for automated generation of multicriterial optimized plans with optimized beam orientations and intensity profiles, and plans with optimized profiles for preselected beam arrangements. For 20 patients, five IMRT plans, based on one "wish-list," were compared: (i) and (ii) seven- and nine-beam equiangular coplanar plans (iCycle(7equi), iCycle(9equi)), (iii) and (iv) nine-beam plans with optimized coplanar and noncoplanar beam orientations (iCycle(copl), iCycle(noncopl)), and (v) a nine-beam coplanar plan with optimized gantry angles and one optimized couch rotation (iCycle(couch)). VMAT plans without and with this optimized couch rotation were evaluated., Results: iCycle(noncopl) resulted in the best salivary gland sparing, while iCycle(couch) yielded similar results for 18 patients. For iCycle(7equi), submandibular gland NTCP values were on average 5% higher. iCycle(9equi) performed better than iCycle(7equi). iCycle(copl) showed further improvement. Application of the optimized couch angle from iCycle(couch) also improved NTCP values in VMAT plans., Conclusions: iCycle allows objective comparison of competing planning strategies. Integrated optimization of beam profiles and angles can significantly improve normal tissue sparing, yielding optimal results for iCycle(noncopl).

Background and Purpose: To evaluate the patterns of locoregional relapse and survival following submandibular gland (SMG)-sparing intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)., Patients and Methods: Eighty patients with laryngeal (n = 15), oropharyngeal (n = 50), hypopharyngeal (n = 11) or nasopharyngeal cancer (n = 4) were treated by submandibular gland-sparing IMRT for head and neck squamous cell cancer between July 2000 and December 2008. All patients were treated by bilateral IMRT. Thirty-nine (49%) received definitive radiotherapy (RT) and 41 (51%) postoperative RT. The contralateral parotid gland (PG) and SMG were included in the dose optimization planning program with intent to keep the mean doses for PG and SMG below 23 Gy and 28-30 Gy, respectively. The ipsilateral glands were also spared when considered feasible., Results: During a median follow-up time of 51 months (range, 24-117 months) nine local recurrent tumors were observed. Four of these nine patients were salvaged by surgery with no further recurrence. All local recurrences were located within the high-dose CTVs. None of the locally recurrent cancers were located at the vicinity of the spared PGs or SMGs. No recurrent tumors were observed in the contralateral neck. The Kaplan-Meier estimate for local control at five years following IMRT was 88% for the whole cohort and the corresponding figure for local control following salvage surgery was 94%. The estimates for five-year overall survival and disease-specific survival were 85% and 90%, respectively., Conclusion: In selected head and neck cancer patients who are estimated to have a low risk of cancer recurrence at the nodal levels I-II and who are treated with SMG-sparing IMRT the risk of cancer recurrence at the vicinity of the spared salivary glands is low.

Purpose: To investigate whether intensity-modulated proton therapy with a reduced spot size (rsIMPT) could further reduce the parotid and submandibular gland dose compared with previously calculated IMPT plans with a larger spot size. In addition, it was investigated whether the obtained dose reductions would theoretically translate into a reduction of normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs)., Methods: Ten patients with N0 oropharyngeal cancer were included in a comparative treatment planning study. Both IMPT plans delivered simultaneously 70 Gy to the boost planning target volume (PTV) and 54 Gy to the elective nodal PTV. IMPT and rsIMPT used identical three-field beam arrangements. In the IMPT plans, the parotid and submandibular salivary glands were spared as much as possible. rsIMPT plans used identical dose-volume objectives for the parotid glands as those used by the IMPT plans, whereas the objectives for the submandibular glands were tightened further. NTCPs were calculated for salivary dysfunction and xerostomia., Results: Target coverage was similar for both IMPT techniques, whereas rsIMPT clearly improved target conformity. The mean doses in the parotid glands and submandibular glands were significantly lower for three-field rsIMPT (14.7 Gy and 46.9 Gy, respectively) than for three-field IMPT (16.8 Gy and 54.6 Gy, respectively). Hence, rsIMPT significantly reduced the NTCP of patient-rated xerostomia and parotid and contralateral submandibular salivary flow dysfunction (27%, 17%, and 43% respectively) compared with IMPT (39%, 20%, and 79%, respectively). In addition, mean dose values in the sublingual glands, the soft palate and oral cavity were also decreased. Obtained dose and NTCP reductions varied per patient., Conclusions: rsIMPT improved sparing of the salivary glands and reduced NTCP for xerostomia and parotid and submandibular salivary dysfunction, while maintaining similar target coverage results. It is expected that rsIMPT improves quality of life during and after radiotherapy treatment., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To observe the recovery of saliva output and effect on xerostomia grade after intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with or without contralateral submandibular gland (cSMG) sparing and to assess the impact of salivary gland dosimetry on this recovery among patients with head-and-neck cancer., Methods and Materials: Between May 2007 and May 2008, 52 patients with head-and-neck cancer received definitive (n=5 patients) and postoperative (n=47 patients) IMRT at our institution, with at least one parotid gland spared. Of these patients, 26 patients with a low risk of recurrence in the cSMG region underwent IMRT and had their cSMGs spared (cSMG-sparing group). The remaining 26 high-risk patients had no cSMGs spared (cSMG-unspared group). Xerostomia grades and salivary flow rates were monitored at five time points (before IMRT and at 2, 6, 12, and 18 months after IMRT)., Results: Average mean doses and mean volumes receiving 30 Gy (V30) of the cSMGs were lower in the cSMG-sparing group than in the cSMG-unspared group (mean dose, 20.4 Gy vs. 57.4 Gy; mean V30, 14.7% vs. 99.8%, respectively). Xerostomia grades at 2 and 6 months post-IMRT were also significantly lower among patients in the cSMG-sparing group than in the cSMG-unspared group, but differences were not significant at 12 and 18 months after IMRT. Patients in the cSMG-sparing group had significantly better mean unstimulated salivary flow rates at each time point post- IMRT as well as better mean stimulated salivary flow rates at 2 months post-IMRT., Conclusions: Recovery of saliva output and grade of xerostomia post-IMRT in patients whose cSMGs were spared were much better than in patients whose cSMGs were not spared. The influence of the mean doses to the cSMG and parotid gland on the recovery of saliva output was equivalent to that of the mean V30 to the glands., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To assess volumetric changes of selected organs at risk (OAR) during intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for oropharyngeal carcinoma., Materials and Methods: Twenty-six consecutive patients that were treated with definitive IMRT ± chemotherapy between November 2007 and November 2008 were selected for the present study. As part of an internal quality assurances program, a repeat kilovolt (KV) computed tomography was planned weekly during the 7-week treatment course. On each available scan, a single observer contoured the parotid submandibular, and thyroid glands (PG/SMG/TG), larynx (L), and constrictor, masticatory, and sternocleidomastoid muscles (CM/MM/SCM) as appropriate. The volume at each scan was compared with the one at planning CT in a pair-wise fashion. p values <0.05 after correction for multiple testing were considered significant., Results: A total of 159 scans was obtained during treatment for a total of 185 scans, including the baseline imaging. All OARs showed statistically significant changes over baseline by week 5. At week 7, the PG showed the largest absolute change with an average reduction of ∼10 mL followed by both the SCM and MM (∼-5 mL). The largest (∼-30%) relative change was observed for the salivary glands. L and CM showed a ∼15% increase in volume during treatment., Conclusion: All selected OAR undergo significant volumetric changes during a course of IMRT for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To test the hypothesis that scanned intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) results in a significant dose reduction to the parotid and submandibular glands as compared with intensity-modulated radiotherapy with photons (IMRT) and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) for oropharyngeal cancer. In addition, we investigated whether the achieved dose reductions would theoretically translate into a reduction of salivary dysfunction and xerostomia., Methods and Materials: Ten patients with N0 oropharyngeal carcinoma were used. The intensity-modulated plans delivered simultaneously 70 Gy to the boost planning target volume (PTV2) and 54 Gy to the elective nodal areas (PTV1). The 3D-CRT technique delivered sequentially 70 Gy and 46 Gy to PTV2 and PTV1, respectively. Normal tissue complication probabilities were calculated for salivary dysfunction and xerostomia., Results: Planning target volume coverage results were similar for IMPT and IMRT. Intensity-modulated proton therapy clearly improved the conformity. The 3D-CRT results were inferior to these results. The mean dose to the parotid glands by 3D-CRT (50.8 Gy), IMRT (25.5 Gy), and IMPT (16.8 Gy) differed significantly. For the submandibular glands no significant differences between IMRT and IMPT were found. The dose reductions obtained with IMPT theoretically translated into a significant reduction in normal tissue complication probability., Conclusion: Compared with IMRT and 3D-CRT, IMPT improved sparing of the organs at risk, while keeping similar target coverage results. The dose reductions obtained with IMPT vs. IMRT and 3D-CRT varied widely per individual patient. Intensity-modulated proton therapy theoretically translated into a clinical benefit for most cases, but this requires clinical validation., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To investigate the predictors of incidence and duration of xerostomia (XT) based on parotid glands (PG), submandibular glands (SMG), and both glands taken as a whole organ (TG) in head-and-neck cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy., Methods and Materials: A prospective study was initiated in May 2003. Sixty-three head-and-neck patients (44 with nasopharynx cancer) were included in the analysis. Using the dose-volume histogram the PG, SMG, and TG mean doses were calculated. Unstimulated and stimulated salivary flow were measured and XT-related questionnaires were compiled before and at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after radiotherapy. Salivary gland toxicity was evaluated using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group scale, and Grade >or=3 toxicity was used as the endpoint. The XT incidence was investigated according to descriptive statistics and univariate and multivariate analysis. The Bonferroni method was used for multiple comparison adjustment., Results: After a reduced flow at 3 months after radiotherapy, recovery of salivary flow was observed over time. Primary site and salivary gland mean doses and volumes were identified in univariate analysis as prognostic factors. Multivariate analysis confirmed that TG mean dose (p = 0.00066) and pretreatment stimulated salivary flow (p = 0.00420) are independent factors for predicting XT., Conclusion: The TG mean dose correlates with XT as assessed by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria, salivary output, and XT-related questionnaires. Our results suggest that TG mean dose is a candidate dose constraint for reducing XT, requiring considerably more validation in non-nasopharyngeal cancer patients.

Purpose: A comparative treatment planning study was performed to compare volumetric-modulated arc (RA) to conventional intensity modulated (IMRT) for involved-field (IFRT) and involved-node (INRT) radiotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL)., Methods and Materials: Plans for 10 early-stage HL female patients were computed for RA and IMRT. First, the planning target volume (PTV) coverage and organs at risk (OAR) dose deposition was assessed between the two modalities. Second, the OAR (lung, breast, heart, thyroid, and submandibular gland) dose-volume histograms were computed and compared for IFRT and INRT, respectively., Results: For IFRT and INRT, PTV coverage was equally homogeneous with both RA and IMRT. By and large, the OAR irradiation with IFRT planning was not significantly different between RA and IMRT. For INRT, doses computed for RA were, however, usually lower than those with IMRT, particularly so for the lung, breast, and thyroid. Regardless of RA and IMRT modalities, a significant 20-50% decrease of the OAR computed mean doses was observed with INRT when compared with IFRT (Breast D(Mean) 1.5 +/- 1.1 vs. 2.6 +/- 1.7 Gy, p < 0.01 and 1.6 +/- 1.1 vs. 2.9 +/- 1.9 Gy, p < 0.01 for RA and IMRT, respectively)., Conclusions: RA and IMRT results in similar level of dose homogeneity. With INRT but not IFRT planning, the computed doses to the PTV and OAR were usually higher and lower with RA when compared to IMRT. Regardless of the treatment modality, INRT when compared with IFRT planning led to a significant decrease in OAR doses, particularly so for the breast and heart.

Purpose: To investigate dose-volume effects of salivary flow and the functional recovery over time, using salivary function data and different models of normal tissue complication probability (NTCP)., Methods and Materials: A total of 59 patients with head-and-neck cancer treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) were analyzed in the present study. The toxicity was evaluated using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) scale and salivary flows, both unstimulated (USF) and stimulated (SSF). The assessments were done before radiotherapy (RT) and at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after RT. Grade 3 toxicity was the primary endpoint. Analyses of toxicity incidence at 3, 6, and 12 months after RT were performed by both the Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) and relative seriality (S) models., Results: A significant correlation was found between the incidence of Grade 3 toxicity and the incidence of patients with a reduction in SSF to <25% of the pre-RT value. Better correlations resulted between the RTOG toxicity score and the dosimetric parameters, compared with USF/SSF. The TD(50), assessed by the LKB model, was 21.4, 27.8, and 41.6 Gy at 3, 6, and 12 months after RT, respectively. The TD(50), assessed by the S model, was 20.0, 26.3, and 40.0 Gy at 3, 6, and 12 months after RT, respectively., Conclusion: Recovery of salivary gland function vs. time after RT took place mostly within 1 year after RT. The RTOG Grade 3 was a reliable score to perform the NTCP modeling. The choice of NTCP model had no influence on the accuracy of predictions.

Purpose: Submandibular salivary glands (SMGs) dysfunction contributes to xerostomia after radiotherapy (RT) of head-and-neck (HN) cancer. We assessed SMG dose-response relationships and their implications for sparing these glands by intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)., Methods and Materials: A total of 148 HN cancer patients underwent unstimulated and stimulated SMG salivary flow rate measurements selectively from Wharton's duct orifices, before RT and periodically through 24 months after RT. Correlations of flow rates and mean SMG doses were modeled throughout all time points. IMRT replanning in 8 patients whose contralateral level I was not a target incorporated the results in a new cost function aiming to spare contralateral SMGs., Results: Stimulated SMG flow rates decreased exponentially by (1.2%)(Gy) as mean doses increased up to 39 Gy threshold, and then plateaued near zero. At mean doses < or =39 Gy, but not higher, flow rates recovered over time at 2.2%/month. Similarly, the unstimulated salivary flow rates decreased exponentially by (3%)(Gy) as mean dose increased and recovered over time if mean dose was <39 Gy. IMRT replanning reduced mean contralateral SMG dose by average 12 Gy, achieving < or =39 Gy in 5 of 8 patients, without target underdosing, increasing the mean doses to the parotid glands and swallowing structures by average 2-3 Gy., Conclusions: SMG salivary flow rates depended on mean dose with recovery over time up to a threshold of 39 Gy. Substantial SMG dose reduction to below this threshold and without target underdosing is feasible in some patients, at the expense of modestly higher doses to some other organs.

Background and Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of sparing the parotid glands and surgically transferred submandibular gland (SMG) by intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in post-operative cases of head and neck cancer (HNC)., Materials and Methods: Ten patients (larynx-2, base of tongue-4, tonsil-3, and unknown primary-1; pathologic stages III-IV) who underwent SMG transfers on the side of N0 neck along with definitive surgery were selected for this study. IMRT planning was done retrospectively using helical tomotherapy approach. Planning objective was to deliver 60 Gy to PTV1 and 54 Gy to PTV2 while maintaining the mean dose to the total parotid volume (TPV) and SMG less than 26 Gy., Results: The mean dose (+/-SD) to the TPV and SMG were 25+/-0.6 Gy and 23+/-1.9 Gy, respectively. The D(95) for PTV1 and PTV2 were 59.9+/-0.1 Gy and 54.9+/-0.3 Gy, respectively, satisfying our planning goal for PTV coverage. The D(99) for PTV1 and PTV2 were 58.2+/-0.7 Gy and 49.5+/-2.2 Gy, respectively, showing that sparing the salivary glands did not result in underdosing of the PTVs., Conclusions: By combining the gland transfer and IMRT, the mean dose to TPV and transferred SMG could be reduced to less than 26 Gy in post-operative patients of HNC.