Back to Search
Start Over
Targeted Intervention to Improve the Quality of Head and Neck Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning in the Netherlands: Short and Long-Term Impact.
- Source :
-
International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics [Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys] 2019 Nov 01; Vol. 105 (3), pp. 514-524. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Jul 12. - Publication Year :
- 2019
-
Abstract
- Purpose: To benchmark and improve, through means of a targeted intervention, the quality of intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment planning for locally advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) in the Netherlands. The short and long-term impact of this intervention was assessed.<br />Methods and Materials: A delineated computed tomography-scan of an oropharynx HNC case was sent to all 15 Dutch radiation therapy centers treating HNC. Aims for planning target volume and organ-at-risk (OAR) dosimetry were established by consensus. Each center generated a treatment plan. In a targeted intervention, OAR sparing of all plans was discussed, and centers with the best OAR sparing shared their planning strategies. Impact of the intervention was assessed by (1) short-term (half a year after intervention) replanning of the original case and (2) long-term (1 and 3 years after intervention) planning of new cases.<br />Results: Benchmarking revealed substantial difference in OAR doses. Initial mean doses were 22 Gy (range, 15-31 Gy), 35 Gy (18-49 Gy), and 37 Gy (20-46 Gy) for the contralateral parotid gland, contralateral submandibular gland, and combined swallowing structures, respectively. Replanning after targeted intervention significantly reduced mean doses and variation, but clinically relevant differences still remained: 18 Gy (14-22 Gy), 28 Gy (17-45 Gy), and 29 Gy (18-39 Gy), respectively. One and 3 years later the variation remained stable.<br />Conclusions: Despite many years of HNC intensity modulated radiation therapy experience, initial treatment plans showed surprisingly large variations. The simple targeted intervention used in this analysis improved OAR sparing, and its impact was durable; however, fairly large dose differences still continue to exist. Additional work is needed to understand these variations and to minimize them. A national radiation oncology platform can be instrumental for developing and maintaining high-quality planning protocols.<br /> (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Benchmarking standards
Health Care Surveys
Humans
Netherlands
Organ Sparing Treatments standards
Organs at Risk diagnostic imaging
Parotid Gland diagnostic imaging
Parotid Gland radiation effects
Pharyngeal Muscles diagnostic imaging
Pharyngeal Muscles radiation effects
Quality Improvement
Radiation Dosage
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted methods
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated methods
Submandibular Gland diagnostic imaging
Submandibular Gland radiation effects
Time Factors
Tongue diagnostic imaging
Tongue radiation effects
Tonsillar Neoplasms diagnostic imaging
Tonsillar Neoplasms radiotherapy
Benchmarking methods
Head and Neck Neoplasms diagnostic imaging
Head and Neck Neoplasms radiotherapy
Organ Sparing Treatments methods
Organs at Risk radiation effects
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted standards
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated standards
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1879-355X
- Volume :
- 105
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 31306734
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.07.005