Search

Aims: The aim of this study was to determine whether there is a difference in the rate of wear between acetabular components positioned within and outside the 'safe zones' of anteversion and inclination angle., Patients and Methods: We reviewed 100 hips in 94 patients who had undergone primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) at least ten years previously. Patients all had the same type of acetabular component with a bearing couple which consisted of a 28 mm cobalt-chromium head on a highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXLPE) liner. A supine radiostereometric analysis (RSA) examination was carried out which acquired anteroposterior (AP) and lateral paired images. Acetabular component anteversion and inclination angles were measured as well as total femoral head penetration, which was divided by the length of implantation to determine the rate of polyethylene wear., Results: The mean anteversion angle was 19.4° (-15.2° to 48°, sd 11.4°), the mean inclination angle 43.4° (27.3° to 60.5°, sd 6.6°), and the mean wear rate 0.055 mm/year (sd 0.060). Exactly half of the hips were positioned inside the 'safe zone'. There was no difference (median difference, 0.012 mm/year; p = 0.091) in the rate of wear between acetabular components located within or outside the 'safe zone'. When compared to acetabular components located inside the 'safe zone', the wear rate was no different for acetabular components that only achieved the target anteversion angle (median difference, 0.012 mm/year; p = 0.138), target inclination angle (median difference, 0.013 mm/year; p = 0.354), or neither target (median difference, 0.012 mm/year; p = 0.322)., Conclusion: Placing the acetabular component within or outside the 'safe zone' did not alter the wear rate of HXLPE at long-term follow-up to a level that risked osteolysis. HXLPE appears to be a forgiving bearing material in terms of articular surface wear, but care must still be taken to position the acetabular component correctly so that the implant is stable. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:891-7.

Background: Tibial baseplate roughness and polyethylene-insert micromotion resulting from locking-mechanism loosening can lead to polyethylene backside wear in TKAs. However, many retrieval studies examining these variables have evaluated only older TKA implant designs., Questions: We used implant-retrieval analysis to examine if there were differences in: (1) backside damage scores, (2) backside damage modes, and (3) backside linear wear rates in five TKA implant designs owing to differing baseplate surface roughness and locking mechanisms. Additionally, we examined if (4) patient demographics influence backside damage and wear., Methods: Five TKA implant models (four modern and one historical design) were selected with different tibial baseplate and/or locking mechanism designs. Six tibial inserts retrieved at the time of revision from each TKA model were matched for time in vivo, age of the patient at TKA revision, BMI, sex, revision number, and revision reason. Each insert backside was analyzed for: (1) visual total damage score and (2) individual visual damage modes, both by two observers and with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.66 (95% CI, 0.39-0.92), and (3) linear wear rate measured by micro-CT. Median primary outcomes were compared among the five designs. For our given sample size among five groups we could detect with 80% power a 10-point difference in damage score and an 0.11-mm per year difference in wear rate., Results: The polished tibial design with a partial peripheral capture locking mechanism and anterior constraint showed a lower total damage score compared with the nonpolished tibial design with only a complete peripheral-rim locking mechanism (median, 12.5; range, 9.5-18.0; 95% CI, 9.58-16.42 versus median, 22.3; range, 15.5-27.0; 95% CI, 17.5-26.5; p = 0.019). The polished baseplate with a tongue-in-groove locking mechanism showed more abrasions than the nonpolished baseplate with a peripheral-rim capture and antirotational island (median, 7.25; range, 0.5-8.0; 95% CI, 2.67-8.99 versus median, 0.75; range, 0-1.5; 95% CI, 0.20-1.47; p = 0.016)). Dimpling was a unique wear mode to the nonpolished baseplates with the peripheral-rim capture and antirotational island (median, 5.5; range, 2.0-9.0; 95% CI, 2.96-8.38) and the peripheral-rim capture alone (median, 9.0; range, 6.0-10.0; 95% CI, 7.29-10.38). Overall, the linear wear rate for polished designs was lower than for nonpolished designs (0.0102 ± 0.0044 mm/year versus 0.0224 ± 0.0119 mm/year; p < 0.001). Two of the polished baseplate designs, the partial peripheral capture with anterior constraint (median, 0.083 mm/year; range, 0.0037-0.0111 mm/year; 95% CI, 0.0050-0.0107 mm versus median, 0.0245 mm/year; range, 0.014-0.046 mm/year; 95% CI, 0.0130-0.0414 mm; p = 0.008) and the tongue-in-groove locking mechanism (median, 0.0085 mm/year; range, 0.005-0.015 mm/year; 95% CI, 0.0045-0.0138 mm; p = 0.032) showed lower polyethylene linear wear rates compared with the nonpolished baseplate design with only a peripheral-rim capture., Conclusions: Total damage scores and linear wear rates were highest involving the nonpolished design with only a peripheral rim capture. There were no differences among the other TKA designs regarding damage and wear, but this finding should be considered in the setting of a relatively small sample size., Clinical Relevance: Our study showed that in the complex interplay between baseplate surface finish and locking mechanism design, a polished baseplate with a robust locking mechanism had the lowest backside damage and linear wear. However, improvements in locking mechanism design in nonpolished baseplates potentially may offset some advantages of a polished baseplate. Further retrieval analyses need to be done to confirm such findings, especially analyzing current crosslinked polyethylene. Additionally, we need mid- and long-term studies comparing TKA revisions attributable to wear and osteolysis among implants before understanding if such design differences are clinically relevant.

Background: The purpose of this study was to report the radiographic wear rates from a previous randomized controlled trial of first-generation highly crosslinked versus conventional polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty (THA) at a minimum of 13 years' follow-up., Methods: Patients returned for radiographic imaging and radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Radiographs were reviewed for the presence of osteolysis or component loosening. Femoral head penetration (which includes both wear and creep) was measured using RSA. We compared Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) and Harris Hip Scores (HHS) with preoperative values., Results: There was 1 revision in each group. There was no difference in WOMAC, SF-12, or HHS outcome scores between the highly crosslinked and conventional polyethylene groups (all p ≥ 0.13). Wear rate was lower with crosslinked polyethylene than conventional polyethylene (0.04 ± 0.02 mm/year v. 0.08 ± 0.03 mm/year, p = 0.007)., Conclusion: First-generation crosslinked polyethylene demonstrates greater wear resistance than conventional polyethylene after 13 years of implantation. Crosslinked polyethylene continues to outperform conventional polyethylene into the second decade of implantation.

Background: Coronal plane alignment is one of the contributing factors to polyethylene wear in total knee arthroplasty., Methods: Based on 95 retrieved polyethylene inserts, wear and damage patterns were analyzed in relationship to the overall mechanical alignment and to the position of the tibial component., Results: A progression of wear was observed with progressively mechanical varus alignment. However, there was significantly more damage in the lateral compartment in the mild and moderate varus group compared to the valgus group. No difference in damage was seen between all groups for tibial component positioning in valgus or varus., Conclusion: Progressive wear was observed with progressively varus alignment with more damage at the lateral side. This observation is unique and might be explained by lateral condylar lift-off inducing impact and shear loading in the varus group., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Wear in posterior-stabilized (PS) polyethylene tibial inserts depends on component position, limb alignment, and ligament balancing. Valgus-varus constrained (VVC) inserts are likely to be affected similarly. We aimed to compare wear characteristics of VVC and PS inserts and identify associated factors., Methods: This was a retrieval analysis (macroscopic and radiographic) of all 18 VVC liners collected from patients who underwent revision surgery from 1999 to 2011. These patients were matched to another group with PS inserts who underwent revision in the same time period., Results: There was significantly more damage in the posts of the VVC group (13.0 ± 5.0, compared to 4.7 ± 1.9 in the PS group; P < .001). Within the VVC group, the total damage score and cold flow damage were significantly higher with excessive joint line changes (≥5 mm; P = .01). The excessive joint line elevation was associated with rotational wear pattern of the post (P = .004). Damage scores were increased with femoral component malposition (P = .04), anterior tibial slope (P = .04), and tibial component malposition (P = .04)., Conclusion: Joint line elevation, femoral and tibial component malposition, and anterior tibial slope resulted in significantly more wear in the VVC inserts. Joint line elevation of >5 mm resulted in wear of the medial and lateral aspects of the post, femoral valgus resulted in cold flow wear of the anterior post, and tibial valgus and anterior slope resulted in wear of lateral aspect of the post., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Although it is understood that backside damage occurs in polyethylene acetabular liners, the effect of highly crosslinked polyethylene, which has completely replaced conventional polyethylene, has yet to be examined., Questions/purposes: The purpose of this study was to answer the following questions: (1) With conventional polyethylene (CPE), did the acetabular design make a difference in backside wear? (2) Is there a difference in backside damage between CPE and crosslinked polyethylene (XLPE) liners? (3) With XLPE, is the difference in backside wear between designs still present? (4) Is there any difference in backside damage in various zones on backside of individual liners?, Methods: This single-institution retrieval analysis involved visual damage scoring on the backside of 233 polyethylene liners implanted between 2002 and 2011. The liners were retrieved from either polished/dovetail cups (PD) or roughened/wire cups (RW) made by two different manufacturers. The inserts were divided into four groups: PD-CPE (n = 105), PD-XLPE (n = 16), RW-CPE (n = 99), and RW-XLPE (n = 13). Aseptic loosening and polyethylene wear were the predominant reasons for revision of CPE liners, whereas instability and infection were the common reasons for revision of XLPE liners. The time in situ (TIS) was shorter for the XLPE liners as compared with the CPE liners (PD-CPE: 8.5 years [SD 4.4]; RD-CPE: 9.5 [SD 4.8]; PD-CPE: 3.8 [SD 3.7]; RD-XLPE: 4.0 [SD 4.3]). The backside of each liner was divided into five zones and graded initially from a scale of 0 to 3 for seven different damage modes by one observer. There was substantial interobserver (kappa 0.769) and intraobserver (0.736) reliability on repeat scoring. To compare the effects of crosslinking, a subset of the conventional polyethylene liners was matched to the crosslinked liners based on TIS, resulting in 16 per group for the two PD types and 13 per group for the two RW types., Results: Total damage scores in the RW-CPE (19 ± 7) group were greater (p < 0.001) than the PD-CPE group (8 ± 4). Damage was reduced with XLPE (p = 0.02) only for the RW-XLPE (9 ± 9) versus RW-CPE-type sockets (4 ± 4). There was no difference (p = 0.16) between the RW-XLPE group and the PD-XLPE group. Damage scores in the peripheral zone of the locking mechanisms were higher for RW-CPE (4 ± 3) compared with PD-CPE (1.4 ± 1.0, p < 0.001) and RW-XLPE (1.3 ± 1.3, p = 0.02). Damage was greater (p < 0.001) within the superior zones (7 ± 4) compared with the inferior zones (3.0 ± 2.8) of all liners., Conclusions: The current study shows greater backside damage for CPE in the roughened, wire lock cups. XLPE was shown to be more resistant to backside damage for both socket designs., Clinical Relevance: Although the polished/dovetail cups seem to cause less backside damage in the CPE liners than roughened/wire cups, the use of XLPE liners has been shown to protect the liner from backside damage in either cup design. If an acetabular shell has a functional locking mechanism, surgeons should not worry about cup design when undertaking isolated liner revision using XLPE liners.

This study compared the damage scores and damage patterns in 19 tibial inserts from rotating hinge (RH) implants with 19 inserts from highly constrained (HC) implants. Each insert was divided into 16 damage zones and each zone was subjectively graded from a scale of 0-3 for seven different damage modes. The overall damage scores were comparable for the two groups (RH: 64.1 ± 15.4; HC: 66.1 ± 29.0; P = 0.59). The HC group, however, had greater post damage (compared to the post-hole of RH) while the RH group had greater backside damage. The pattern of damage was also different, with burnishing and cold flow being more common in HC group while pitting, scratching and embedded debris were more common in the RH group., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term results of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in young patients using either a conventional (CPE) or a highly cross-linked (HXLPE) polyethylene liner in terms of functional outcome, incidence of osteolysis, radiological wear and rate of revision., Methods: We included all patients between the ages of 45 and 65 years who, between January 2000 and December 2001, had undergone a primary THA for osteoarthritis at our hospital using a CPE or HXLPE acetabular liner and a 28 mm cobalt-chrome femoral head. From a total of 160 patients, 158 (177 hips) were available for review (CPE 89; XLPE 88). The mean age, body mass index (BMI) and follow-up in each group were: CPE: 56.8 years (46 to 65); 30.7 kg/m(2) (19 to 58); 13.2 years (2.1 to 14.7) and HXLPE: 55.6 years (45 to 65); BMI: 30 kg/m(2) (18 to 51); 13.1 years (5.7 to 14.4)., Results: The mean Harris hip score (HHS) at final follow-up was 89.3 for the CPE group and 90.9 for the HXLPE group (p = 0.078). Osteolysis was present around 15 acetabular (17%) and 16 femoral (18%) components in the CPE hips compared with none (0%) in the HXLPE hips. The mean radiological linear wear of the CPE liners was 0.11 mm/year compared with 0.035 mm/year for the HXLPE liners (p = 0.006). The cumulative implant survival, with revision for polyethylene wear as the endpoint, was 86% (95% confidence interval 78 to 94) in the CPE group and 100% in the HXLPE group at 13 years (numbers at risk at 13 years - CPE: 65, XLPE: 61)., Discussion: This study shows that HXLPE liners are associated with significantly less osteolysis and a lower rate of revision THA than CPE liners at long-term follow-up., Take Home Message: The findings of this study highlight the clinical benefits of using HXLPE liners in THA and support the routine use of the material in order to improve implant longevity and to decrease the number of patients needing revision for aseptic osteolysis., (©2016 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.)

Background: Highly crosslinked polyethylene (XLPE) is believed to demonstrate better wear resistance than conventional polyethylene (CPE) in total hip arthroplasty., Questions/purposes: The purpose of this study was to compare visual damage scores and micro-CT measurements of penetration, a surrogate for wear, between matched retrieved XLPE and CPE acetabular liners., Methods: Thirteen XLPE acetabular liners were matched in terms of implant design (all were of the same design), patient age, sex, liner dimensions, duration of implantation, and reason for revision to a group of CPE liners that were retrieved in the same time period. Penetration resulting from the combination of wear and creep in the two groups of liners was measured with micro-CT. Surface damage was scored by two blinded observers using a surface damage system that considers the seven common damage modes: pitting, scratching, burnishing, abrasions, impingement, embedded debris, and delamination, and wear patterns were documented., Results: There was no difference (p=0.32) in total damage score between the XLPE group (14±4) and the CPE group (15±5). However, there was three times greater penetration (odds ratio, 3.1; confidence interval, 2.3-5.1; p<0.001) in the CPE group (0.18±0.09 mm/year) than in the XLPE group (0.05±0.07 mm/year). There was less volumetric loss in XLPE (82±SD 134 mm3) versus the CPE group (350±SD 342 mm3; p=0.017)., Conclusions: XLPE liners undergo less penetration as a result of creep and wear than CPE liners based on quantitative measurements provided by micro-CT, which was not apparent using damage scoring alone. This demonstrates the use of three-dimensional imaging techniques such as micro-CT for quantifying wear in retrieval studies., Clinical Relevance: In this study, XLPE had less wear but similar damage scores than CPE, allaying concerns that the beneficial wear properties of XLPE might come with a tradeoff arising from the increased brittleness of that material.

To perform wear measurements on retrieved joint replacement implants, a reference geometry of the implant's original state is required. Since implants are rarely individually scanned before implantation, a different, new implant of the same kind and size is frequently used. However, due to manufacturing variability, errors may be introduced into these measurements, as the dimensions between the retrieved and reference components may not be exactly the same. The hypothesis of this study was that new polyethylene tibial inserts from different manufacturing lots would demonstrate greater variability than those from the same lot. In total, 12 new tibial inserts of the same model and size were obtained, 5 from the same lot and the remainder from different lots. The geometry of each tibial insert was obtained using microcomputed tomography. Measurements of tibial insert volume, thickness, and three-dimensional surface deviations were obtained and compared between tibial inserts from the same and different manufacturing lots. Greater variability was found for the tibial inserts from different manufacturing lots for all types of measurements, including a fourfold difference in volume variability (p < 0.001) and a maximum of 0.21 mm difference in thickness (p < 0.001). Investigators should be aware of this potential confounding error and take steps to minimize it, such as by averaging together the geometries of multiple new components from different manufacturing lots for use as the reference geometry.

Fluid adsorption and the associated mass gain behaviour in tibial inserts of total knee replacements was investigated in polyethylene (PE) manufactured from extruded GUR 1050 resin. Repeatedly removing the PE inserts from the soak fluid for gravimetric assessment (including cleaning, desiccation, and weighing) increased the mass gain. Soaking PE inserts for 46 days or 92 days seemed to give about the same mass gain. PE inserts that were soaked at 37 degrees C gained more mass than PE inserts soaked at room-temperature. Gas-plasma sterilized PE inserts gained less mass than gamma-in-air sterilized PE inserts. No statistically significant differences were detected in mass gain between PE inserts that were of 10mm and 14mm thickness. The mass gain of PE inserts was higher in protein-rich soak fluid compared with low-ion distilled water. Prior to knee simulator wear testing, tibial PE inserts should be conditioned in the same medium and under the same test conditions (gravimetric assessment frequency, fluid protein content, and fluid temperature). This approach would help improve the accuracy and precision of the gravimetrically determined PE wear rate during knee simulator wear testing.

Two self-aligning mobile bearing knee replacements (SAL-1) with gamma-in-nitrogen sterilized polyethylene inserts were revised due to instability after 6.3 years and after 14.2 years in vivo in two patients. The predominant damage features were burnishing, cracking, and delamination and were observed on the proximal bearing surface of the retrieved polyethylene inserts. This suggested an association with sub-surface fatigue, perhaps initiated by in vivo oxidative degradation which was confirmed by developing a sub-surface white band in one insert. The damage features observed on the distal bearing surface of the polyethylene inserts suggested both an adhesive wear mechanism and an abrasive wear mechanism. The titanium-nitrite coated, titanium-alloy tibial tray was severely worn in one case and possibly contributed to third-body abrasive wear at the distal surface interface. We suggest to carefully follow-up patients who received this type of mobile bearing knee system., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Wear of polyethylene tibial inserts can decrease the longevity of total knee arthroplasty. Wear is currently assessed using laboratory methods that may not permit backside wear measurements or do not quantify surface deviation., Questions/purposes: We developed and validated a technique to quantify polyethylene wear in tibial inserts using microcomputed tomography (micro-CT), a nondestructive high-resolution imaging technique that provides detailed images of surface geometry in addition to volumetric measurements., Methods: Six unworn and six wear-simulated polyethylene tibial inserts were evaluated. Each insert was scanned three times using micro-CT at a resolution of 50 μm. The insert surface was reconstructed for each scan and the insert volume was calculated. Gravimetric analysis was performed for all inserts, and the micro-CT and gravimetric volumes were compared to determine accuracy. We created three-dimensional surface deviation maps., Results: Micro-CT generated high-quality three-dimensional renderings of the insert surface geometry. Between-scan precision was 0.07%; we observed no difference between micro-CT and gravimetric volume measurements., Conclusions: Micro-CT can provide precise and accurate volumetric measurements in addition to quantifiable three-dimensional surface deviation maps for the entire insert surface. The technique has the potential to evaluate wear in wear simulator trials and retrieval studies., Clinical Relevance: This micro-CT technique combines the benefits of volumetric and surface scanning methods to quantify wear across all surfaces of polyethylene components with a single tool. When applied in wear simulator and retrieval studies, these measurements can be used to evaluate and predict the wear properties of the components.

Unlabelled: The range of motion after TKA depends on many patient, surgical technique, and implant factors. Recently, high-flexion designs have been introduced as a means of ensuring or gaining flexion after TKA. We therefore evaluated factors affecting postoperative flexion to determine whether implant design influences longterm flexion. We prospectively collected data on patients receiving a primary Genesis II total knee replacement with a minimum of 1-year followup (mean, 5.4 years; range, 1-13 years). We recorded pre- and postoperative outcome measures, patient demographics, and implant design (cruciate retaining [CR, n = 160], posterior stabilized [PS, n = 1177], high-flex posterior stabilized [HF-PS, n = 197]). Backward stepwise linear regression modeling identified the following factors affecting postoperative flexion: preoperative flexion, gender, body mass index, and implant design. Independent of gender, body mass index, and preoperative flexion, patients who received a HF-PS and PS design implant had a mean of 8 degrees and 5 degrees more flexion, respectively, than those who received a CR implant. Patients with low flexion preoperatively (<100 degrees) were more likely to gain flexion, whereas those with high flexion preoperatively (>120 degrees) were most likely to maintain or lose flexion postoperatively. Controlling for implant design, patients with high flexion preoperatively (>120 degrees) were more likely to gain flexion with the HF-PS design implant (HF-PS = 32.0%; PS = 15.1%; CR = 4.5%)., Level of Evidence: Level II, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The purpose of this study is to compare the range of motion and clinical outcomes of a standard posterior-stabilized (PS) vs the high-flex (HF) polyethylene tibial insert of a posterior cruciate substituting total knee arthroplasty system. One hundred patients were entered into a prospective, blinded, randomized clinical trial in which 50 patients received a Genesis II PS insert and 50 patients received a Genesis II HF insert (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN). At an average follow-up of 2.7 years (range, 2.3-3.1 years), there were no differences in any outcome measures (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index, Short-Form 12, Knee Society clinical rating scores, anterior knee pain). There were no differences (P = .811) in average knee flexion at 2 years (standard, 123 degrees +/- 7 degrees; HF, 124 degrees +/- 7 degrees). In summary, this prospective blinded randomized clinical trial demonstrated no differences between a PS and HF polyethylene design. Long-term evaluation will be required to comment on differences in polyethylene wear and implant longevity.

Background: Highly cross-linked polyethylene was introduced for clinical use in total hip arthroplasty with the expectation that it would exhibit less wear when compared with conventional polyethylene. The purpose of this study was to report the clinical and radiographic results, after a minimum of five years of follow-up, of a randomized, blinded, controlled trial comparing a conventional polyethylene with a first-generation highly cross-linked polyethylene., Methods: One hundred patients were enrolled in a prospective, randomized controlled study comparing highly cross-linked and conventional polyethylene acetabular liners in total hip arthroplasty. Fifty patients were in each group. At the time of follow-up, clinical outcomes were assessed and steady-state femoral head penetration rates (after bedding-in) for each patient were calculated with use of a validated radiographic technique. In addition, a statistical comparison of polyethylene wear between groups was performed with use of generalized estimating equations., Results: At a mean of 6.8 years postoperatively, there were no differences between the two polyethylene groups with regard to the Harris hip score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), or Short Form-12 (SF-12) score. The mean femoral head penetration rate in the first through fifth years was found to be significantly lower in the group treated with the highly cross-linked polyethylene (0.003 mm/yr [95% confidence interval, +/-0.027]) than it was in the group treated with conventional polyethylene (0.051 mm/yr [95% confidence interval, +/-0.022]) (p=0.006). Men treated with a conventional polyethylene liner had a significantly higher (p

Unlabelled: Metal-on-metal bearing total hip arthroplasty is performed more commonly than in the past. There may be manufacturing differences such as clearance, roughness, metallurgy, and head size that affect performance. In a prospective, randomized trial, we compared 2-year postoperative ion levels for a 28-mm metal-on-polyethylene bearing with 28-mm and 36-mm metal-on-metal bearings. We measured serum, erythrocyte, and urine ion levels. We observed no difference in the ion levels for the 28-mm and 36-mm metal-on-metal bearings. The ion levels in these patients were lower than reported for most other metal-on-metal bearings. Although both erythrocyte and serum cobalt increased, erythrocyte chromium and erythrocyte titanium did not increase despite a four- to sixfold serum chromium and a three- to fourfold serum titanium increase. This may represent a threshold level for serum chromium and serum titanium below which erythrocytes are not affected., Level of Evidence: Level I, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: Three-dimensional radiographic techniques have been developed to estimate in vivo polyethylene wear of total hip replacements. We are not aware of any published study examining the accuracy of these in vivo methods. Our objective was to validate two radiographic techniques by comparing their results with those obtained directly from retrieved specimens., Methods: A coordinate measuring machine was used to probe the interior bearing surface of seventeen acetabular liners that had been retrieved at revision surgery. Solid models were created to determine volumetric polyethylene loss and linear depth and direction of wear. Two in vivo radiographic techniques (PolyWare and the Martell Hip Analysis Suite) were used to calculate two-dimensional linear, three-dimensional linear, and volumetric wear. The radiographic analysis was done independently, and the results were compared with the known values of polyethylene wear derived with use of the coordinate measuring machine., Results: Correlation coefficients comparing the values for two-dimensional and three-dimensional linear wear and volumetric wear derived with the PolyWare radiographic technique with the values derived with the coordinate measuring machine were r(2) = 0.78, r(2) = 0.75, and r(2) = 0.91, respectively (all p < 0.001), and the correlation coefficients comparing the values derived with the Martell Hip Analysis Suite radiographic technique with those derived with the coordinate measuring machine were r(2) = 0.80, r(2) = 0.84, and r(2) = 0.91, respectively (p < 0.001). The average absolute difference between the radiographic estimates and the results derived with the coordinate measuring machine was approximately 19% (range, 13% to 24%)., Conclusions: There was good agreement between the wear estimates made with both in vivo techniques and the measurements of the retrieved polyethylene liners made with the coordinate measuring machine. Two-dimensional wear analysis (based on anteroposterior radiographs) accounted for most of the polyethylene wear, while one technique of three-dimensional wear analysis (PolyWare) demonstrated some additional wear in the lateral plane.