Search

Background: The reasons for kidney allograft failure subsequent to pancreas after kidney (PAK) are multifactorial; therefore, we examined these factors to identify a meaningful risk assessment that could assist in patient selection., Methods: Five transplant centers in New England collaborated for this multiinstitutional retrospective study of 126 PAK transplantation recipients who had a functioning pancreas allograft 7 days after transplantation. Host factors (age at pancreas transplant, gender, body weight, glomerular filtration rate at 3 months pre-PAK and at 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month post-PAK, presence of proteinuria, pre- or post-PAK kidney rejection, pancreas rejection, cytomegalovirus disease, and HbA1C at 6-month post-PAK) and transplant factors (time to PAK, use of induction antibody therapy, and combinations of immunosuppressive medications) were assessed in both univariate and multivariate analyses for the primary outcome of kidney allograft failure., Results: Of the variables assessed, factors associated with kidney allograft loss after PAK include impaired renal function in the 3 months before PAK, proteinuria, the occurrence of a post-PAK kidney rejection episode, and interval between kidney and pancreas transplantation more than 1 year., Conclusions: In our analysis, post-PAK kidney allograft loss was strongly associated with glomerular filtration rate less than 45 mL/min pre-PAK, K to P interval of over 1 year, pre-PAK kidney rejection episode, and pre-PAK proteinuria. Diabetic candidates for PAK with any of these conditions should be counseled regarding the risk of post-PAK renal transplant failure.

Background: The optimal regimen for prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease after kidney and/or pancreas transplantation remains unclear. We compared the effectiveness of three months of oral ganciclovir (3 g/day) versus low-dose valganciclovir (450 mg/day) for CMV prophylaxis., Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients at our center who received kidney and/or pancreas transplants between January 2000 and April 2003. We used a Cox proportional hazards model to examine the relationship between baseline covariates, including type of CMV prophylaxis, and time to development of CMV disease., Results: Of the 500 patients (295 ganciclovir, 205 valganciclovir), 22 patients (4.4%) developed CMV disease (mean time to CMV disease, 163+/-85 days). Sixteen of the ganciclovir patients (5.4%) and six of the valganciclovir patients (2.9%) developed CMV disease (P=0.18). By CMV serostatus, the incidence of CMV disease during the first posttransplant year was 8.5% among donor-seropositive, recipient-seronegative (D+/R-) patients, 8.6% among D+/R+ patients, 2.9% among D-/R+ patients, 1.0% among D-/R- patients, and 0.9% among patients for whom documentation of CMV serostatus was incomplete. In the unadjusted Cox proportional hazards analysis, race/ethnicity, type of transplant, type of antiviral prophylaxis, CMV serostatus, and use of mycophenolate mofetil were each associated with risk of developing CMV disease. In the adjusted, multivariable model, only CMV serostatus was associated with development of CMV disease., Conclusions: Three months of low-dose valganciclovir (450 mg/day) was as effective as ganciclovir (3 g/day) for prophylaxis of CMV disease after kidney and/or pancreas transplantation.

Enteric drainage of exocrine secretions in whole organ pancreas transplantation is generally avoided in patients with pre-existing small bowel disease; however, bladder drainage is associated with a 20% rate of urinary tract-related complications. This is a case report of a type 1 diabetic patient with celiac sprue and renal failure. We performed a simultaneous cadaveric kidney pancreas transplant enterically draining the exocrine pancreas. There were no complications. The patient is now more than 6 months post-transplant with excellent function of both renal and pancreas allografts. We conclude that enteric drainage of pancreas allografts in patients with celiac sprue may be performed safely. Whole organ pancreas transplantation is being performed with greater success than ever before, mostly as a result of lessons learned from past experience (1). Enteric drainage of allograft exocrine secretions is preferred for simultaneous pancreas/kidney (SPK) recipients to avoid urinary tract complications associated with bladder drainage. However, most agree that diabetics with pre-existing bowel disease should have bladder drainage of allograft exocrine secretions, so as to prevent the devastating complication of a bowel leak. We describe here a successful case of enteric drainage of an SPK transplant in a patient with celiac sprue. We believe that, when carefully performed, enteric drainage of pancreas allografts is a safe approach for diabetic patients with celiac sprue, and may avert the serious complications associated with bladder drainage.