Search

Few studies have directly compared anterior and posterior surgical approaches in cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) patients with short-segment disease. We aimed to examine and compare surgical outcomes of anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF) and selective laminoplasty (S-LAMP) in CSM patients with 1- or 2-level disease.Forty-six patients, who received surgeries for CSM, were prospectively investigated; 24 underwent ACDF and 22 underwent S-LAMP. Average follow-up was 3.5 years. The following pre- and postoperative radiographic measurements were recorded: (1) C2-7 angle, (2) local angle (lordotic Cobb angle at operative level), (3) cervical sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (center of gravity of the head-C7 SVA), and (4) C7 slope. Outcomes were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopedic Association scoring system for cervical myelopathy (C-JOA score), neck pain visual analog scale, and neck disability index (NDI).There were no significant differences in patient demographics between the two groups. Postoperatively, C2-7 angle, local angle, cervical SVA, C7 slope, C-JOA score, and neck pain and NDI scores were not significantly different between the two groups; however, the recovery rate of the C-JOA score was superior in the ACDF group (57.5%) compared to the S-LAMP group (42.1%). The recovery rate of the C-JOA score in the local lordosis subgroup (local angle ≥ 0°) showed no significant difference between the two surgical groups. However, in the local kyphosis subgroup (local angle 0°), C-JOA score recovery rate was worse after S-LAMP (20.4%) than ACDF (57.9%); local angle also worsened postoperatively after S-LAMP.In patients with local lordosis at the segments of cervical spondylosis and spinal cord compression, S-LAMP showed equivalent surgical outcomes (neurological recovery, neck pain and NDI scores, and cervical alignment) to ACDF. However, in patients with local kyphosis, S-LAMP worsened the kyphosis and resulted in worse neurological recovery.

Prospective comparative study.To investigate the benefits of postoperative application of lumbosacral orthosis after single-level discectomy for lumbar disc herniation (LDH).Although many surgeons use postoperative lumbosacral orthosis for patients with LDH, there is no clear evidence to support or deny its effectiveness.Ninety-nine consecutive patients who underwent the microscopic discectomy were included. They were divided into two groups: Orthosis group and Non-orthosis group, before surgery. The recurrence rate and reoperation rate were compared between the two groups at 4-week, 6-month and 1-year follow-up. Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score for lumbar spine (L-JOA score) at 2-week and 1-year follow-up, lower extremities and low back pain's visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 6-month and 1-year follow-up were compared.Forty-two patients in the Orthosis group and 39patients in the Non-orthosis group were followed up for at least 1-year after surgery. Recurrence occurred in 3 patients (7.1%) in the Orthosis group and 6 (15.4%) in the Non-orthosis group within 1-year. Two patients (4.8%) in the Orthosis group and 2 patients (5.1%) in the Non-orthosis group underwent reoperation. There were no significant intergroup differences in the recurrence rate and in the reoperation rate. No significant difference was also observed between the two groups in L-JOA score, ODI, VAS of low back pain, and leg pain at 1-year after surgery. Furthermore, at any other follow-up period, no significant differences were observed between the two groups in recurrence rate, reoperation rate, L-JOA score, VAS of low back/leg pain, or ODI.Postoperative orthosis did not reduce the recurrence/ reoperation rates, nor improve postoperative clinical symptoms. Routine use of orthosis may not be necessary after single-level lumbar discectomy.

Background The latest clinical guidelines are mandatory for physicians to follow when practicing evidence-based medicine in the treatment of low back pain. Those guidelines should target not only Japanese board-certified orthopaedic surgeons, but also primary physicians, and they should be prepared based entirely on evidence-based medicine. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association Low Back Pain guideline committee decided to update the guideline and launched the formulation committee. The purpose of this study was to describe the formulation we implemented for the revision of the guideline with the latest data of evidence-based medicine. Methods The Japanese Orthopaedic Association Low Back Pain guideline formulation committee revised the previous guideline based on a method for preparing clinical guidelines in Japan proposed by Medical Information Network Distribution Service Handbook for Clinical Practice Guideline Development 2014. Two key phrases, "body of evidence" and "benefit and harm balance" were focused on in the revised version. Background and clinical questions were determined, followed by literature search related to each question. Appropriate articles were selected from all the searched literature. Structured abstracts were prepared, and then meta-analyses were performed. The strength of both the body of evidence and the recommendation was decided by the committee members. Results Nine background and nine clinical qvuestions were determined. For each clinical question, outcomes from the literature were collected and meta-analysis was performed. Answers and explanations were described for each clinical question, and the strength of the recommendation was decided. For background questions, the recommendations were described based on previous literature. Conclusions The 2019 clinical practice guideline for the management of low back pain was completed according to the latest evidence-based medicine. We strongly hope that this guideline serves as a benchmark for all physicians, as well as patients, in the management of low back pain.

Study design Prospective observational cohort study. Objective To prospectively examine dysphagia after subaxial cervical spine surgery. Summary of background data Although dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery is common and well-studied, it has rarely been examined in posterior subaxial cervical spine surgery. Methods This study analyzed 191 consecutive patients (132 male, 59 female; mean age, 64.9 yrs) who underwent subaxial cervical spine surgery for degenerative disease and completed 1 year of follow-up. Anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) was performed in 87 patients, posterior decompression with fusion (PDF) in 21, and laminoplasty (LAMP) in 83. Dysphagia was evaluated by a self-administered questionnaire using the Bazaz dysphagia scale before, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery. Diagnosis, levels and number of operative segments, C2-7 lordotic angle (CL), O-C2 angle (OC2A), C2-7 range of motion (ROM), Japanese Orthopedic Association for cervical myelopathy (C-JOA) score, and neck pain visual analog scale (VAS) were examined. Results Thirty-two patients (16.8%) reported dysphagia before surgery. New dysphagia after surgery, defined as more than or equal to 1 grade worsening of the Bazaz score after surgery compared with the preoperative status, was observed in 38 patients (19.9%) at 6 months and 32 patients (16.8%) at 1 year. The incidence of new dysphagia at 1 year was 25.3% in the ADF group, 23.8% in the PDF group, and 6.0% in the LAMP group. Fusion surgery (ACDF or PDF) and increased CL after surgery were found as risk factors at 1 year in multivariate analysis; receiver operating characteristic analysis determined a postsurgical change in CL cutoff of 5°. Conclusion Fusion surgery and increased CL after surgery were risk factors for development of dysphagia after subaxial cervical spine surgery. Cervical alignment change due to anterior and posterior fusion surgery can cause postoperative dysphagia.Level of Evidence: 3.

In Japan, cervical total disc replacement (TDR) was approved in 2017. However, because of its short history, no comparative study between cervical TDR and anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF) has been conducted in the country. Therefore, we examined and compared the surgical outcomes of TDR and ACDF for one-level cervical degenerative diseases.In total, 50 patients who had received anterior surgeries for one-level cervical degenerative diseases were investigated. Among them, 25 underwent TDR (Prestige LP; Medtronic), whereas the other 25 patients underwent ACDF. ACDF samples were selected from cases conducted before the approval of TDR (-2017.9) and were retrospectively judged to be indicated for TDR. Before and at 1 year after surgery, clinical and radiological outcomes were evaluated.No significant differences in terms of patient demographics between the two groups were observed. A longer operative time was observed in the TDR group than in the ACDF group. Postoperatively, no differences in the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score for cervical myelopathy (C-JOA) score, neck pain visual analog scale, C2-7 angle, and C2-7 range of motion (ROM) were determined. TDR tended to show better neck disability index (NDI) scores postoperatively when compared with ACDF. The local angle at operative level was larger in ACDF. In TDR, the local ROMs were maintained postoperatively; however, in ACDF, the local ROM at the operative level was decreased, and the local ROMs at adjacent levels were increased postoperatively. In the TDR group, although heterotopic ossification was observed in 11 patients (44.0%), and anterior bone loss was identified in 14 patients (56.0%), these issues did not affect surgical outcomes.Conclusively, no differences in terms of C-JOA score and neck pain between patients treated through TDR and ACDF were observed. However, a trend of better NDI scores was identified with TDR. While TDR maintained postoperative ROMs, ACDF showed an increase in the local ROMs at adjacent levels.

Background Surgical procedures for cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) are often chosen based on OPLL size and cervical spine alignment. Recently, cervical sagittal alignment based on sagittal vertical axis (SVA) has received increased attention as an important determinant of radiological and clinical outcomes after surgery. This study aimed to investigate the impact of SVA-based cervical sagittal alignment on surgical treatment for cervical OPLL by reviewing a previous retrospective cohort in which its concept was not taken into account in the surgical procedure choices. Methods We reviewed a total of 96 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for cervical myelopathy caused by OPLL from 2008 to 2014. We performed anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) or posterior decompression with fusion (PDF) on patients with massive OPLL or kyphotic alignment, and we performed laminoplasty (LAMP) on patients without massive OPLL or kyphotic alignment. CSVA (center of gravity of the head - C7 SVA), CL (C2-7 lordotic angle) and C7 slope were measured in cervical X-ray at standing position. Clinical results were evaluated using C-JOA score. We divided patients into two subgroups based on the preoperative CSVA: the Low-CSVA (CSVA Results In the Low-CSVA subgroup, none of the three operations had an effect on the CL. In contrast, in the High-CSVA subgroup, while ADF and PDF had no effect on the CL, LAMP worsened the CL postoperatively. The recovery rates of the C-JOA scores in the Low-CSVA subgroup showed no significant differences among the three operations; however in the High-CSVA subgroup, LAMP resulted in worse recovery rate of the C-JOA score than ADF or PDF. Conclusions LAMP is not suitable for patients with cervical myelopathy caused by OPLL who have high CSVA alignment, even in cases without massive OPLL or kyphotic alignment.

Study Design: Retrospective single-center study. Objectives: K-line is a decision-making tool to determine the appropriate surgical procedures for patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (C-OPLL). Laminoplasty (LAMP) is one of the standard surgical procedures indicated on the basis of K-line measurements (+: OPLL does not cross the K-line). We investigated the impact of K-line tilt, a radiographic parameter of cervical sagittal balance measured using the K-line, on surgical outcomes after LAMP. Methods: The study included 62 consecutive patients with K-line (+) C-OPLL who underwent LAMP. The following preoperative and postoperative radiographic measurements were evaluated: (1) the K-line, (2) K-line tilt (an angle between the K-line and vertical line), (3) center of gravity of the head –C7 sagittal vertical axis, (4) C2–C7 lordotic angle, (5) C7 slope, and (6) C2–C7 range of motion. Clinical results were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopedic Association scoring system for cervical myelopathy (C-JOA score). Results: All the patients had non-kyphotic cervical alignment (CL ≥ 0°) preoperatively; however, kyphotic deformity (CL < 0°) was observed in 6 patients (9.7%) postoperatively. The recovery rate of the C-JOA scores was poor in the kyphotic deformity (+) group (7.8%) than in the kyphotic deformity (−) group (47.5%). The K-line tilt was identified to be a preoperative risk factor in the multivariate analysis, and the cutoff K-line tilt for predicting the postoperative kyphotic deformity was 20°. Conclusions: LAMP is not suitable for K-line (+) C-OPLL patients with K-line tilts >20°.

STUDY DESIGN A retrospective case series. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and clinical features of laminar closure in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) based on prospectively collected data. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Laminar closure after single open-door laminoplasty (LAMP) has been reported to result in poor clinical outcomes. However, no studies to date have examined the underlying mechanisms and frequency of laminar closure after double-door LAMP. METHODS This study prospectively enrolled 128 consecutive patients with CSM scheduled for double-door LAMP without a laminar spacer at our hospital between 2008 and 2013. Sagittal parameters including C2-7 angle, T1 slope, and cervical sagittal vertical axis (C-SVA), which is defined as the distance between the anterior margin of the external auditory canal plumb line and the posterior-cranial corner of the C7 vertebral body on x-ray, were calculated before and after the operation. Laminar angle was also measured on magnetic resonance images preoperatively and at 1 week and 1 year postoperatively. Laminar closure was defined as > 20% decrease in laminar angle at 1 year compared with that at 1 week postoperatively. The Japanese Orthopedic Association score for cervical myelopathy and the recovery rate determined from the preoperative and postoperative scores were evaluated as clinical outcomes. RESULTS In total, 110 patients were completely followed up for at least 1 year (follow-up rate: 85.9%). Laminar closure was observed in six cases (5.5%) at the 1-year follow-up. The recovery rate in these six cases was significantly lower than in cases without laminar closure (16.6% vs. 45.1%, respectively). Logistic regression analysis revealed age and C-SVA as significant risk factors for postoperative laminar closure. CONCLUSION This study is the first to investigate the incidence of laminar closure after double-door LAMP without a laminar spacer. Laminar closure occurred exclusively in elderly patients with kyphotic deformity after LAMP.Level of Evidence: 4.

Background Parkinson’s disease (PD) has been found to increase the risk of postoperative complications in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). However, few studies have investigated this by directly comparing patients with PD and those without PD. Methods In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, we reviewed all surgically treated ASD patients with at least 2 years of follow-up. Among them, 27 had PD (PD+ group). Clinical data were collected on early and late postoperative complications as well as any revision surgery. Radiographic parameters were evaluated before and immediately after surgery and at final follow-up, including sagittal vertical axis (SVA), thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, and pelvic tilt. We compared the surgical outcomes and radiographic parameters of PD patients with those of non-PD patients. Results For early complications, the PD+ group demonstrated a higher rate of delirium than the PD− group. In terms of late complications, the rate of non-union was significantly higher in the PD+ group. Rates of rod failure and revision surgery due to mechanical complications also tended to be higher, but not significantly, in the PD+ group (p = 0.17, p = 0.13, respectively). SVA at final follow-up and loss of correction in SVA were significantly higher in the PD+ group. Conclusion Extra attention should be paid to perioperative complications, especially delirium, in PD patients undergoing surgery for ASD. Furthermore, loss of correction and rate of non-union were greater in these patients.

Several studies have reported that overweightness and obesity are associated with higher complication rates in lumbar spine surgery. However, little is known about the effect of obesity on postoperative complications in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery, especially in the elderly. This study aimed to examine the effect of body mass index (BMI) on surgical outcomes and postoperative complications in elderly ASD patients undergoing surgical correction in Japan.We conducted a retrospective, multicenter, observational study of 234 consecutive patients diagnosed with ASD who underwent corrective surgery. Patients were divided into two groups according to BMI, BMI25 (153 patients, mean age 71.9 years) and BMI ≥ 25 (overweight/obese, 81 patients, mean age 73.3 years). Radiographic results and perioperative complications were compared between the two groups.Surgical complications occurred in approximately 20% of patients in each group; complications did not significantly differ between the two groups. A greater proportion of patients in the BMI ≥ 25 group experienced mechanical failure and DJK, although the difference was not significant. Preoperative mean lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI) minus LL, sacral slope (SS) and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) were similar in the BMI 25 and BMI ≥ 25 groups. However, the BMI ≥25 group had lower mean LL (p = 0.015) and higher PI minus LL (p = 0.09) postoperatively. The BMI ≥25 groups also had significantly smaller LL (p = 0.026), smaller SS (p = 0.049) and higher SVA (p = 0.041) at the final follow-up, compared to the BMI 25 group.In the present study, no difference in medical or surgical complications after ASD surgery was found between overweight/obese patients (BMI ≥ 25) and those with BMI 25. However, correction of LL and SVA was smaller in patients with overweight/obese patients.

Background Decompression through an anterior approach is theoretically effective for the surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic amyotrophy (CSA), because the pathology usually locates at the anterior side. However, most previous studies investigated posterior surgery or a mix of anterior surgery and posterior surgery in their investigation. Only a few small case series have investigated the surgical outcomes of anterior decompression and fusion (ADF). Therefore, we conducted a multicenter retrospective study that included patients who underwent ADF for proximal-type CSA. Methods We analyzed the outcomes of 77 consecutive spinal surgeries performed on proximal-type CSA patients who underwent ADF. Preoperative and postoperative manual muscle tests (MMT) and the patients’ backgrounds, radiological findings, and complications were reviewed. We divided the cases into two groups, good-outcome group (MMT improvement ≧ 2 or improved to MMT 5) and poor-outcome group (others) and evaluated the prognostic factors for outcomes. Results Of the 77 patients, 48 (62%) showed good neurological outcome. Multiple compressive lesions at anterior horn (AH) and/or ventral nerve roots (VNRs) were detected in 66 patients (85.7%) on the magnetic resonance images. The patients with a single compressive lesion at VNR or AH tended to show good neurological recovery when compare to those with multiple lesions. Age and duration of symptoms were related to the poor outcome in univariate analysis. Duration of symptoms was an independent factor associated with postoperative neurological outcome. The cut-off value for poor outcome was 7.0 months for the symptom duration (sensitivity: 79%, specificity: 54%, area under the curve: 0.69). Conclusions Patients with proximal-CSA were more likely to have multiple compressive lesions at an AH and/or a VNR. The prognostic factor for poor neurological outcome was duration of symptoms of ≥7 months.

Study design A retrospective single-center study. Objective To assess the diagnostic value of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal swab and suction drain tip cultures. Summary of background data The prognostic value of MRSA nasal swab and suction drain tip cultures has not been firmly established in spinal surgery. Methods This study retrospectively included 4573 consecutive patients who underwent spinal surgery between January 2008 and December 2014. Patients diagnosed with infectious disease were excluded. Prophylactic antibiotics were administered intraoperatively and postoperatively for 48 hours. MRSA nasal swab cultures were taken from all patients before surgery. Drains were removed when the volume of postoperative fluid drainage was less than 50 mL in the preceding 24 hours and cultures were made. Surgical site infection (SSI) was defined according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. Results SSI was identified in 94 cases (2.1%) and bacteria were isolated in 87 cases (92.6%). Positive MRSA nasal swab cultures were identified in 49 cases (1.1%). There was no significant difference in the SSI positivity rate between the MRSA nasal swab culture (+) and (-) groups. Positive drain tip cultures were found in 382 cases (8.4%), 28 of which developed SSI. There was a significant difference in the SSI positivity rate between the drain tip culture (+) and (-) groups. The sensitivity of drain tip culture was 29.8% and the specificity was 92.1%. In 16 of the 28 patients in the SSI (+) group with positive drain cultures, the same bacteria were isolated from the surgical site, giving a bacteria matching rate of 57.1%. Conclusion MRSA nasal swab and drain tip cultures were not useful for predicting SSI. However, drain tip culture had a high positivity rate in the SSI group and the coincidence rate for the causative pathogen was relatively high. Level of evidence 4.

Study design A retrospective cohort study. Objective The aim of this study is to investigate the preoperative factors for postlaminoplasty kyphotic deformity in cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) patients without preoperative kyphotic alignment focused on the cervical sagittal balance. Summary of background data After laminoplasty (LAMP), appropriate decompression may be obtained when cervical lordosis is maintained to allow the posterior shift of the spinal cord. Therefore, LAMP is not suitable for patients with preoperative cervical kyphosis. However, we sometimes encounter patients who developed postoperative kyphosis despite normal preoperative alignment. The risk factors of postlaminoplasty kyphotic deformity for the patients without preoperative kyphotic alignment are not well known. Methods A total of 174 consecutive patients who received a double-door LAMP for CSM without preoperative kyphotic alignment and completed a 1-year follow-up were enrolled. Cervical lateral X-ray images obtained in the standing position were measured at the preoperative stage and during a 1-year follow-up visit. The radiographic measurements included the following: (1) C2-7 lordotic angle (C2-7 angle), (2) C2-7 range of motion (C2-7 ROM), (3) CGH (center of gravity of the head)-C7 SVA, and (4) C7 slope. The clinical results were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopedic Association score system for cervical myelopathy (C-JOA score). Results Postoperative kyphotic deformity was observed in 9 patients (5.2%). The recovery rates of the C-JOA scores at the 1-year follow-up period in the kyphotic deformity (+) group were inferior to those of the kyphotic deformity (-) group. The CGH-C7 SVA and advanced age were detected as preoperative risk factors using multivariate analysis. Cutoff values for predicting postlaminoplasty kyphotic deformity were a CGH-C7 SVA = 42 mm and an age of 75 years. Conclusion Cervical sagittal imbalance and advanced age were the preoperative risk factors for kyphotic deformity after LAMP for CSM in patients without preoperative cervical kyphotic alignment. Level of evidence 4.

Background We previously reported the usefulness of neuromagnetic recordings for the diagnosis of disorders in peripheral nerves or the spinal cord. However, there have been no reports on incomplete conduction block of the spinal cord, which is clinically common in conditions such as cervical myelopathy. Here, we estimated the usefulness of measuring spinal cord evoked magnetic fi elds for evaluating incomplete conduction block. Methods Incomplete conduction block models of the spinal cord of the rabbit were established using a Fogarty balloon catheter that was inserted into the epidural space of the cervical spine. Electrical stimuli were applied to the lower thoracic spinal cord with an epidural catheter electrode. Spinal cord evoked potentials were recorded using epidural electrodes. Spinal cord evoked magnetic fi elds were recorded over the skin surface of the neck using a biomagnetometer. Results The decrease in the conduction velocity and amplitude at the compression site could be detected by spinal cord evoked potentials from the epidural space, confi rming the spinal cord lesion. The waveforms of the magnetic fi elds showed a biphasic confi guration. The distribution of magnetic fi elds showed a characteristic quadrupolar pattern propagating from caudal to cranial. After compression, the amplitude and the conduction velocity of the magnetic fi elds decreased, and the distribution of magnetic fi elds were attenuated and decelerated near the compression site especially in the trailing magnetic fi elds. Diagnosis of the incomplete conduction block was thus possible. Conclusions We report the fi rst measurement of the spinal cord evoked magnetic fi eld in the intact spinal cord from the skin surface and that it can be applied to incomplete conduction block of the injured spinal cord. The use of a biomagnetometer is promising as a less-invasive method for clinically evaluating spinal cord function.

STUDY DESIGN A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from consecutive patients undergoing transcranial electrical motor-evoked potential (TCE-MEP: compound muscle action potentials) monitoring during cervical spine surgery. OBJECTIVE.: To divide the warning threshold of TCE-MEP amplitude changes on the basis of origin into the spinal tract and spinal segments and decide warning thresholds for each. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA The parameter commonly used for the warning threshold in TCE-MEP monitoring is wave amplitude, but amplitude changes have not been examined by anatomical origin. METHODS Intraoperative TCE-MEP amplitude changes were reviewed for 357 patients with cervical myelopathy. Most of the patients were monitored by transcranial electrical stimulated spinal-evoked potential combined with TCE-MEP. The warning threshold of TCE-MEP was taken as waveform disappearance. For each patient, amplitude changes were separated, according to origin, into the spinal tract and spinal segments and compared with clinical outcome. RESULTS Assessable TCE-MEP waves were obtained in 350 cases. Disappearance of TCE-MEP waves, which were innervated by the spinal levels exposed to the surgical invasion, was seen in 11 cases. Disappearance of TCE-MEPs, which were innervated by the spinal levels inferior to them, was seen in 43 cases. There was no postoperative motor deficit in those cases. However, such deficits caused by spinal segment injury were seen in 2 cases, which showed that intraoperative amplitude decreased to 4.5% and 27%. CONCLUSION If we had established the warning threshold as 30% of the control amplitude, we would likely have prevented both cases of postoperative motor deficits, but 106 (30.3%) cases would have become positive cases. If we had established the warning threshold separately as wave disappearance for the spinal tract and 30% of the control amplitude for the spinal segments, sensitivity and specificity would have been 100% and 83.7%, respectively. Dividing the warning threshold on the basis of origin of amplitude changes could reduce false-positive cases and prevent intraoperative injuries.