Search

Workshop bei der Vernetzungs- und Kompetenzstelle Open Access Brandenburg.

Schulung bei der Vernetzungs- und Kompetenzstelle Open Access Brandenburg

The use of digital object identifiers (DOI) for scientific data and scientific software is increasingly common practice for more than a decade. As a result of the Coalition on Publishing Data in the Earth and Space Sciences (COPDESS) and other initiatives, DOI-referenced datasets are fully citable in scholarly literature and more and more journals require the availability of data underlying scientific results and their citation. Technical implementations, like Scholix (a framework for Scholarly Link Exchange) enable direct links and between literature and data and support the visibility of research data. Key elements for enabling these links are persistent identifier (PID). These PIDs allow, e.g., to uniquely identify data, scholarly literature and code (via DOIs), persons (via ORCID), institutions and funding agencies (via ROR – the registry of research organizations), via machine-actionable links and should be included in the DOI metadata. Similar to other scientific disciplines, the use of DOI for geodetic data is increasing in the last years. While this is easy for static data, like for global of regional gravitational models or GNSS campaign data, most geodetic data are large (mainly due to the large number of files and high temporal resolution) and highly dynamic (real time data acquisition) and highly granular. Geodetic services of the International Association for Geodesy (IAG) are international key player for geodetic data provision and distribution and their operating institutions and funding agencies increasingly require the provision of tangible data use and access statistics. Credit through citation was a major reason for the Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS) to establish a Working Group on using DOI for geodetic data sets (GGOS DOI WG) and for the working group members. The GGOS DOI WG was established in 2019 and includes international representatives of IAG Services and geodetic data centres and associated members that aims at developing best practices and recommendations for the consistent implementation of DOIs across all IAG Services and in the greater geodetic community. This presentation will give an update on recent group activities and on the status of DOI minting for geodetic datasets across IAG Services. This presentation was given during a seminar of the GNSS Group of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in Pasadena, CA on Thursday 9 March 2023. &nbsp

This presentation explains the different aspects of FAIR data, data stewardship (DS) and research data management (RDM) and how those topics related to the overall all endorsement of Open Science at Maastricht University (UM). Moreover, it provides a guidance for data stewards on how to support researchers in making their data FAIR and providing support in data storage, organization, archiving and sharing. Topics mentioned in the presentations: UM Open Science The FAIR principles Benefits of FAIR FAIR data stewardship Professionalizing FAIR Data Stewardship in the life sciences: defining job criteria & skills Data Stewards Competence Areas Glossary of research data definitions The Research Data Management portal at UM Data Management Plan (DMP) Data discovery and collection Data processing and sharing Data formats, structuring and organization Storage and backup Data sharing Data Publishing & Archiving Data archiving (Deposit in a repository / register in registry) Use persistent identifiers Use licenses Long term storage &nbsp

Valorização Profissional Mediante Registros Formais - Artigo de Henrique Vieira Filho ISSN 2763-5570 Publicado na Revista TH - A Revista Oficial da Terapia Holística 76a Edição - Junho - Julho / 2022" https://revistaterapiaholistica.com.br/2022/06/15/direitos-autorais-e-valorizacao-profissional-mediante-registros-formais-2/, ISSN 2763-5570 Publicado na Revista TH - A Revista Oficial da Terapia Holística 76a Edição - Junho - Julho / 2022"

Materi ini diberikan pada APJHI Certificate for Journal Editor Standar I (Registration)-12-2021 (Workshop 3)

National audience; Les identifiants pérennes font partie de stratégies nationales, dont les principes sont rappelés en introduction de cette présentation qui répond à deux questions : Pourquoi et comment lier un jeu de données à une publication ? Comment citer un jeu de données ? Ce support comporte ainsi deux parties 1. Les identifiants pérennes : définition, fonctionnement, attribution2. Les identifiants en pratique : faciliter l’accès, la citation, la traçabilité des jeux de données.

Der Vortrag im Rahmen der22. Jahrestagung des AK Bibliotheken der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft beleuchtet die Vorteile von PIDs im Allgemeinen und fokussiertauf den Nutzen vonORCID iDs und ROR IDs im Speziellen.

PIDs work best when they work together! Join us for this session co-hosted by DataCite, Crossref, ORCID and ROR, where we’ll explore the possibilities for reducing administrative burden and increasing transparency throughout the research lifecycle that open PID systems and metadata enable. Along the way, you’ll hear from experts at each organization about how you can maximize PID connections in your workflows, and how open infrastructure providers are collaborating to make research and the world a PIDder place. Speakers include: - Crossref: Rachael Lammey - DataCite: Liz Krznarich & Paul Vierkant - ORCID: Tom Demeranville & Julie Petro - ROR: Maria Gould & Liz Krznarich A recording of the presentation can be found at:https://youtu.be/NVOp5cmgx1k &nbsp

The presentation gives an introduction to DataCite's mission to provide persistent identifiers (PIDs) for scholarly communication.The first part deals with the PID Graph that connects several PID systems and makes new services such as DataCite Commons possible. The second part is about the projects ORCID DE, re3data and ROR in which DataCite is involved in.The third part is about PID infrastructure in Germany.

While evidence-based medicine has become an indispensable condition not only in the work of doctors, but also in the priorities of patients, for many Ukrainian clinicians and researchers continue to be difficult access to the international scientific world. This article is help in the implementation of this issue. Elsevier is one of the largest scientific publishing houses in the world, annually publishes about a quarter of all articles in scientific journals published in the world and has branches in different countries. Since 1999, Elsevier has launched ScienceDirect, an online publisher's resource database. Based on it in 2004 the largest bibliographic and abstract database Scopus were created. To publish the results of your research in Elsevier journals follow these steps: select a journal to publish, read the rules for submitting and registering papers in this journal, prepare and submit an article, track the status of its consideration, prepare changes for it if necessary. There are a number of scientometric indicators to assess the performance of the authors and the ranking of publications. The Hirsch Index is a characteristic of a scientist’s productivity, based on the number of his publications and the number of citations of these publications; calculated on the basis of the distribution of citations of the researchers works. The citation index of articles is an abstract database of scientific publications, indexes the links indicated in the article lists of publications and provides quantitative indicators of these links. Impact factor is a numerical indicator of the importance of a scientific journal, is a criterion by which the level of scientific research in related fields can be compared, calculated over a three-year period. There are tools to simplify the search and identification of information and authors. DOI (digital object identifier) is a serial number of an electronic document in the global Internet, is supported by the CrossRef association. ORCID is a register of unique identifiers of world scientists, integrated into international scientometric databases, platforms for electronic journals, systems for collecting, storing and exporting scientific data; ORCID supplements/replaces the author's name and first name with a set of numbers.

The first hurdle after installing VIVO is to fill it with an initial set of data about an institution, its researchers and their publications. Done manually it is a cumbersome and time-consuming process. One approach to overcome this is to use open-data containing a persistent identifier(PID) like ROR, ORCID or DOI. The advantage lies in the reduced processing of input data: since data does not need to be disambiguated, the data ingestion process can be reduced to mapping the data to the VIVO ontology. While several tools exist that are able to import one PID-identified object into VIVO, the release of Datacite Commons takes this approach to the next level. Datacite Commons offers an interface to a so-called PID-Graph: a structure of multiple connected data objects each identified by a PID. It makes queries possible that take advantage of the connections between several PIDs like e.g. querying an organization (identified by a ROR iD) and its affiliated persons (identified by their ORCID iD) and subsequently their publications (identified by a DOI), and thus providing a quick data basis for an empty Research Information System. In this talk, we will present a microservice importing data from the Datacite Commons PID-Graph and the ROR API into VIVO ( https://github.com/vivo-community/generate2vivo ). This microservice is based on lifting rules defined using the SPARQL-Generate RDF transformation language, which we will overview beforehand. SPARQL-Generate is an expressive template-based language to generate RDF streams or text streams from RDF datasets and document streams in arbitrary formats (for more information see website https://w3id.org/sparql-generate/ ), Diese Arbeit ist im Projekt TAPIR entstanden. TAPIR wird unter den Förderkennzeichen 01PH20001A und 01PH20001B in der Förderlinie "Qualitätsentwicklungen in der Wissenschaft (Meso-Ebene)" teilweise durch das BMBF gefördert.

This presentation contains the guide for the Hands-on tutorial at the Brokerage Event Towards a FAIR Compliant Commons in the ASREN Region, which is part of the program of the 16th International Open Repositories Conference (OR2021).

Over the past year Jisc has led a project examining the role 5 key persistent identifiers (PIDs) can play in the open access landscape. We present an overview of those PIDs along with a discussion of how embedding them within the wider open research workflows will have a positive impact on data and metadata, enabling the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) principles. The PIDs are: Works & Data (DOI), People (ORCID), Organisations (ROR), Funding (GrantID), Projects (RAiD) Ensuring this information is available impacts broadly across data curation and management, particularly: Addressing inequality: broadening the benefits of data-driven science to more and diverse stakeholders by ensuring that within data and the associated works, the contribution of researchers, their funding, organisations and the narrative of the projects being undertaken are described in a discoverable and reusable way that can be made accessible to global networks through agreed standards. Persistently identifying this information willprotect the integrity of research data– ensuring correct attribution and accountability as well as enabling recognition of more contributions and roles for researchers allowing provenance to be established where lesser-known output is the basis for more established later “keystone” work. Increasing Effectiveness: By making it easier to share and re-use factual metadata, these PIDs can free up time to generate more value-additive qualitative, narrative and / or contextual information. Machine to machine processes decrease costs – effort, attention and financial

Presentation explores why some aspects of scholarly publishing areso expensive and shows how PIDs (Persistent Identifiers) can be used to reduce cost without detrimental impact on provenance.

Diese Einführung in die Welt der persistenten Identifiers (PIDs) beschreibt PIDs, ihre Funktionsweise und warum sie für die Forschungscommunity wichtig sind. Die eindeutige Identifizierung von Forschungsoutput sowie sämtlichenbeitragenden Personen und Organisationen durch PIDs, wie DOI, ORCID, ROR stärken Vertrauen und Transparenz in der Forschung. Die Verknüpfungen zwischen den PIDs mit ihren Metadatenund die Interoperabilität ihrer offenen Systeme unterstützen die FAIR Prinzipien. Abschließend beantwortet der Vortrag die Frage: Wie wird man zumPID-Freund?&nbsp

What do you think of when you hear the word RAID? Johnny Depp style pirates battling it out on the high seas? RAIDing the refrigerator Nigella Lawson style? Spraying a can of RAID on some pesky biting bugs? Whatever it is, it infers you will be “doing” something. RAID in the identifier world applies best to “doing” things. It’s an identifierthat puts research projects at the centre of the research world. At its core, RAID is a Handle which acts like a web address for a project or group of activities, and it comes with an “envelope” which contains a record of events and entities related to the project or activity. Examples of things that are related to a project include Data Management Plans, research publications, datasets, researchers, institutions, grants etc. RAID can record all of these related entities in the envelope using their appropriate PIDs (DOIs, ORCIDs etc). There is significant interest in RAID internationally and in this session, we will unpack RAID and answer such questions as: What are the use cases for RAID? Who benefits from RAID? What’s the difference between a Grant Identifier (DOI) and a RAID? Do you need both? Who manages RAID and how many are using it? How does RAID interact with ORCIDs, DOIs and other identifiers? How is RAID being used in the research Openness Profile? What are the plans for the RAID identifier service going forward in terms of technical, governance and community aspects? RAID is flagged for ISO certification in May 2021. This is an opportunity to hear more about RAID and how you may wish to use it.

Vortrag auf dem PIDapalooza 2021.Die Sitzung beginnt mit einem Toast auf PIDs. Alle Teilnehmer*innen der Sitzung werden gebeten, einen PID-bezogenen Smoothie zur Sitzung mitzubringen, um bei harter Arbeit gemeinsam etwas zu trinken. Die Arbeit beginnt mit einem kurzen Vortrag, der darauf zurückblickt, was hinsichtlich PIDs wie ORCID, DOI und ROR in Deutschland geleistet wurde, welche Entwicklungen es aktuell gibt, worauf wir stolz sind und was wir besser machen können. Anschließend werden ausgewählte Ziele für PIDs in Deutschland diskutiert. Diese konntenvon der Community im Vorfeld unter Tricider eingereicht und gevoted. Die 3 Ziele mit den meisten Stimmen wurden zur Session thematisiert.

永続的識別子(PID)について全く知らない人、あるいはPIDの基本について復習したい人のためのビギナーズガイドです。このセッションでは、PIDとは何か、何の役に立つのか、なぜ重要なのかについて解説し、いくつかの重要なPIDについて詳しく紹介します。PIDをよく知る専門家に質問して、あなたも今日からPIDの世界に仲間入りしましょう!

This session aims to bring together interested people from all over the world to talk about PIDs in practice-based arts research. It will start with a brief case study on the experience at the University of Westminster, based in London in the UK, who engaged with their practice-based arts research community (and supplier Haplo) to develop their new open source repository software to identify what this research looks like and how the repository could better reflect it. We will then highlight how various Persistent Identifiers don’t quite fit the practice-research landscape – or where they could do, how and where practitioners require more specific guidance that addresses practice research. Without this, the many benefits of the PID graph/landscape are not available to the practice-based research community. The specific examples we will cover include: ORCID iDs, DOIs, RAID and the CRediT taxonomy., Tom Renner wrote the original submission, Taylor Mudd presented during Pidapalooza

Se você é novo no mundo dos identificadores persistentes ou apenas precisa de uma atualização básica sobre PIDs, esta sessão introdutória é para você! Explicaremos o que é um identificador persistente, o que eles podem fazer e por que são importantes; e compartilharemos informações sobre alguns dos principais PIDs. Nosso experiente e entusiasta palestrante vai responder às suas perguntas e compartilhar as informações necessárias para que você mesmo seja uma pessoa PID! Apresentação no PIDapalooza 2021 - em português https://www.pidapalooza.org/schedule &nbsp

A green circle? Colorful overlapping strips? Blue and Black swooshes? Do you know your PID-ful icons? Welcome to... “Nailed It!” - PID edition. The PIDapaloza conference session (very) loosely based on the award winning Netflix show*, based on the internet phenomenon where ordinary people try to recreate masterpieces… but don’t always get there. I’m Laura Paglione, PID enthusiast. Today YOU will join a team to recreate iconic PID logos. One team will walk away with extreme bragging rights. But all are winners here, as you have a bit of fun while getting more familiar with the symbols of the PIDs we use. * This presentation is absolutely in no way related to or supported by Netflix or its show "Nailed It!"., Presentation document differs slightly from that used during the conference session. The session was interactive. This document was updated to include the audience responses. See related identifiers for a link to the recorded presentation. Pixelated recreation on title slide by Erin Paglione and Jordan Paglione.

Nowadays, there exist many resources available to find the scientific information, both commercial and free. Within the search and analysis of scientific publications, the intensive development of information technologies has led to the qualitative and even revolutionary changes. Despite the saturation of the market with technological tools, software, the tools for the information technologies and communications that surround the scientists, many of them are not used or used not enough because they are little known to the academic community. There is also no unique tool that can meet all the needs of scientists in the process of preparing and reviewing the articles. The main subject of this paper is the review and brief analysis of information resources and systems, identifiers and profiles of scientists. The basic search engines, citation databases, library information retrieval systems are described which can and should be used by a Ukrainian scientist to search for scientific literature. The differences between the search for information in commercial databases and the standard search on the Internet are considered. Examples of practical use of citation databases are given. Results of the research profiles of researchers at the Institute of Geophysics named after S.I. Subbotin testify to the lack of usage of Google Scholar services by scientists and the presence of considerable potential to increase the share of their visibility in world scientific and information flows. Only a third of all members of the Institute have a Google Scholar profile. It is shown that high citation statistics are based not only on the quality and relevance of scientific works, but also on the activity of the researcher in the modern media space. Recommendations are provided for registering and using the international ORCID Researcher (Open Researcher and Contributor ID)., В настоящее время существует большое количество ресурсов для поиска научной информации, как коммерческих, так и бесплатных. В аспекте поиска и анализа научных публикаций интенсивное развитие информационных технологий привело к качественным и даже революционным изменениям. Несмотря на насыщенность рынка технологических инструментов, программного обеспечения, инструментов информационных технологий и коммуникации, окружающих деятельность ученых, многие из них не используются или используются недостаточно, поскольку они не известны академическому сообществу. Не существует также единого инструмента, способного удовлетворить все потребности ученых в процессе подготовки и рецензирования статей. Основным предметом настоящей работы является обзор и краткий анализ информационных ресурсов и систем, идентификаторов и профилей ученых. Описаны основные поисковые системы, базы данных цитирований, библиотечные информационно-поисковые системы, которые может и должен использовать украинский ученый для поиска научной литературы. Рассмотрены различия поиска информации в коммерческих базах данных от стандартного поиска в Интернете. Приведены примеры практического использования баз данных цитирований. Результаты исследования профилей научных сотрудников Института геофизики им. С. И. Субботина свидетельствуют о недостаточном использовании сервисов Google Scholar учеными и наличие значительного потенциала по увеличению доли их видимости в мировых научно-информационных потоках. Только третья часть всех сотрудников Института с ученой степенью имеют профиль в Google Scholar. Показано, что высокая статистика цитирования основывается не только на качестве и актуальности научных трудов, но и на активности исследователя в современном медийном пространстве. Даны рекомендации по регистрации и использованию международного идентификатора исследователей ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID)., На сьогодні існує велика кількість ресурсів для пошуку наукової інформації, як комерційних, так і безкоштовних. В аспектi пошуку та аналізу наукових публікацій інтенсивний розвиток інформаційних технологій привів до якісних та навіть революційних змін. Незважаючи на насиченість ринку технологічних інструментів, програмного забезпечення, інструментів інформаційних технологій і комунікації, що оточують діяльність вчених, багато з них не використовуються або використовуються недостатньо, оскільки вони не відомі академічній спільноті. Не існує також єдиного інструменту, здатного задовольнити всі потреби вчених в процесі підготовки і рецензування статей. Основним предметом цієї статті є огляд та короткий аналіз інформаційних ресурсів і систем, ідентифікаторів і профілів вчених. Описані основні пошукові системи, бази даних цитувань, бібліотечні інформаційно-пошукові системи, які може і повинен використовувати український вчений для пошуку наукової літератури. Розглянуто відмінності пошуку інформації в комерційних базах даних від стандартного пошуку в Інтернеті. Наведено приклади практичного використання баз даних цитувань. Результати дослідження профілів наукових співробітників Інституту геофізики ім. С. І. Субботіна свідчать про недостатнє використання сервісів Google Scholar вченими і наявність значного потенціалу щодо збільшення частки їх видимості у світових науково-інформаційних потоках. Лише третя частина всіх працівників Інституту з науковим ступенем мають профіль в Google Scholar. Показано, що висока статистика цитування ґрунтується не тільки на якості та актуальності наукових праць, а й на активності дослідника в сучасному медійному просторі. Надано рекомендації щодо реєстрації та використання міжнародного ідентифікатора дослідників ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID).

Today DataCite launches a new API that powers the PID Graph, the graph formed by scholarly resources described by persistent identifiers (PIDs) and the connections between them. The API is powered by GraphQL, a widely adopted Open Source technology that enables queries of this graph, ...

Purpose This paper aims to compare guidelines for authors in Croatian scholarly journals regarding six scientific fields (according to Croatian classification) and to show the representation of technical and ethical issues that are explained in guidelines for authors. Design/methodology/approach The aim of the research is to identify elements that are included in guidelines for authors in Croatian scholarly journals from all scientific fields. Fourteen parameters for 200 journals were analyzed (all the journals that had published at least one 2016 issue by the end of February 2017). Findings The parameter that is explained in the most journals is the length of the manuscript (91.5 per cent). The lowest number of journals explains Open Researcher and Contributor ID (1.5 per cent). The highest percentage of journals that explain plagiarism is in the field of natural sciences (44 per cent). As compared to the results of previous researches, there is an increase in the number of ethical questions mentioned in the guidelines for authors of Croatian scholarly journals. Practical implications This paper provides recommendations and suggestions that could help journal editors make guidelines for authors more informative. That could help in advancing editorial process (e.g. peer review process) and in avoiding misconducts (e.g. plagiarism or false attribution of authorship). Originality/value This paper is the first detailed content analysis of guidelines for authors in all Croatian scholarly journals.

Presentation given by Esther Plomp for the PID NL - A workshop on the use of Persistent Identifiers in the Netherlands on the 20th of November in The Hague, The Netherlands. &nbsp

While evidence-based medicine has become an indispensable condition not only in the work of doctors, but also in the priorities of patients, for many Ukrainian clinicians and researchers continue to be difficult access to the international scientific world. This article is help in the implementation of this issue. Elsevier is one of the largest scientific publishing houses in the world, annually publishes about a quarter of all articles in scientific journals published in the world and has branches in different countries. Since 1999, Elsevier has launched ScienceDirect, an online publisher's resource database. Based on it in 2004 the largest bibliographic and abstract database Scopus were created. To publish the results of your research in Elsevier journals follow these steps: select a journal to publish, read the rules for submitting and registering papers in this journal, prepare and submit an article, track the status of its consideration, prepare changes for it if necessary. There are a number of scientometric indicators to assess the performance of the authors and the ranking of publications. The Hirsch Index is a characteristic of a scientist’s productivity, based on the number of his publications and the number of citations of these publications; calculated on the basis of the distribution of citations of the researchers works. The citation index of articles is an abstract database of scientific publications, indexes the links indicated in the article lists of publications and provides quantitative indicators of these links. Impact factor is a numerical indicator of the importance of a scientific journal, is a criterion by which the level of scientific research in related fields can be compared, calculated over a three-year period. There are tools to simplify the search and identification of information and authors. DOI (digital object identifier) is a serial number of an electronic document in the global Internet, is supported by the CrossRef association. ORCID is a register of unique identifiers of world scientists, integrated into international scientometric databases, platforms for electronic journals, systems for collecting, storing and exporting scientific data; ORCID supplements/replaces the author's name and first name with a set of numbers.

While evidence-based medicine has become an indispensable condition not only in the work of doctors, but also in the priorities of patients, for many Ukrainian clinicians and researchers continue to be difficult access to the international scientific world. This article is help in the implementation of this issue.Elsevier is one of the largest scientific publishing houses in the world, annually publishes about a quarter of all articles in scientific journals published in the world and has branches in different countries. Since 1999, Elsevier has launched ScienceDirect, an online publisher's resource database. Based on it in 2004 the largest bibliographic and abstract database Scopus were created.To publish the results of your research in Elsevier journals follow these steps: select a journal to publish, read the rules for submitting and registering papers in this journal, prepare and submit an article, track the status of its consideration, prepare changes for it if necessary.There are a number of scientometric indicators to assess the performance of the authors and the ranking of publications. The Hirsch Index is a characteristic of a scientist’s productivity, based on the number ofhis publications and the number of citations of these publications; calculated on the basis of the distribution of citations of the researchers works. The citation index of articles is an abstract database of scientific publications, indexes the links indicated in the article lists of publications and provides quantitative indicators of these links. Impact factor is a numerical indicator of the importance of a scientific journal, is a criterion by which the level of scientific research in related fields can be compared, calculated over a three-year period.There are tools to simplify the search and identification of information and authors. DOI (digital object identifier) is a serial number of an electronic document in the global Internet, is supported by the CrossRef association. ORCID is a register of unique identifiers of world scientists, integrated into international scientometric databases, platforms for electronic journals, systems for collecting, storing and exporting scientific data; ORCID supplements/replaces the author's name and first name with a set of numbers., В то время как доказательная медицина стала неотъемлемым условием не только работы врачей, но и приоритетов пациентов, для многих украинских клиницистов и исследователей продолжает оставаться сложным выход в международный научный мир. Данная статья призвана помочь в реализации этого вопроса.Elsevier – одно из крупнейших научных издательств мира, ежегодно выпускает около четверти всех статей в издаваемых в мире научных журналах и имеет филиалы в разных странах. Начиная с 1999 года, Elsevier открыло платформу ScienceDirect – онлайновую базу данных ресурсов издательства, на основе которой в 2004 году была создана крупнейшая библиографическая и реферативная база данных и инструмент для отслеживания цитирования статей, опубликованных в научных изданиях, – Scopus.Чтобы опубликовать результаты своей научной деятельности в одном из журналов Elsevier, придерживайтесь следующего алгоритма: выберите журнал для публикации, ознакомьтесь с правилами подачи и оформления работ в данный журнал, подготовьте и подайте статью, отслеживайте статус ее рассмотрения, подготовьте к ней изменения при необходимости.Для оценки производительности работ авторов и рейтинга изданий существует ряд следующих наукометрических показателей. Индекс Гирша – характеристика производительности ученого, основанная на количестве его публикаций и количестве цитирований этих публикаций; рассчитывается на основе распределения цитирований работ исследователя. Индекс цитирования статей – реферативная база данных научных публикаций, индексирует ссылки, указанные в пристатейных списках публикаций, и предоставляет количественные показатели этих ссылок. Импакт-фактор – численный показатель важности научного журнала, является критерием, по которому можно сопоставлять уровень научных исследований в близких областях знаний, рассчитывается за трехлетний период.Для упрощения поиска и идентификации информации и авторов существуют соответствующие инструменты. В частности, идентификатор цифрового объекта DOI – серийный номер электронного документа в глобальной сети Интернет, поддерживается ассоциацией CrossRef; ORCID – реестр уникальных идентификаторов ученых мира, интегрированный в международные наукометрические базы данных, платформы для электронных журналов, системы сбора, хранения и экспорта данных о научной деятельности. ORCID дополняет/заменяет фамилию и имя автора набором цифр., У той час як доказова медицина стала невід'ємною умовою не тільки роботи лікарів, а й пріоритетів пацієнтів, для багатьох українських клініцистів і дослідників продовжує залишатися складним вихід у міжнародний науковий світ. Дана стаття призначена допомогти в реалізації цього питання.Elsevier – одне з найбільших наукових видавництв світу, яке щороку випускає близько чверті всіх статей із видаваних у світі наукових журналів і має філії в різних країнах. Починаючи з 1999 року, Elsevier відкрило платформу ScienceDirect – онлайнову базу даних ресурсів видавництва, на основі якої в 2004 році була створена найбільша бібліографічна і реферативна база даних та інструмент для відстеження цитування статей, опублікованих у наукових виданнях, – Scopus.Щоб опублікувати результати своєї наукової діяльності в одному з журналів Elsevier, дотримуйтесь наступного алгоритму: виберіть журнал для публікації, ознайомтеся з правилами подачі та оформлення робіт в даний журнал, підготуйте і подайте статтю, відстежуйте статус її розгляду, підготуйте до неї зміни за необхідності.Для оцінки продуктивності робіт авторів та рейтингу видань існує ряд наступних наукометричних показників. Індекс Гірша – характеристика продуктивності вченого, заснована на кількості його публікацій і кількості цитувань цих публікацій; розраховується на основі розподілу цитувань робіт дослідника. Індекс цитування статей – реферативна база даних наукових публікацій, яка індексує посилання, зазначені в пристатейних списках публікацій, і надає кількісні показники цих посилань. Імпакт-фактор – чисельний показник важливості наукового журналу. Він є критерієм, за яким можна зіставляти рівень наукових досліджень у близьких областях знань, розраховується за трирічний період.Для спрощення пошуку та ідентифікації інформації й авторів існують відповідні інструменти. Зокрема, ідентифікатор цифрового об'єкта DOI – серійний номер електронного документа в глобальній мережі Інтернет, підтримується асоціацією CrossRef; ORCID – реєстр унікальних ідентифікаторів вчених світу, що інтегрований в міжнародні наукометричні бази даних, платформи для електронних журналів, системи збору, зберігання і експортування даних про наукову діяльність. ORCID доповнює/замінює прізвище та ім'я автора набором цифр.

This presentation was delivered on Day 2 of the Authority Management of People Names workshop at theMobilising Data, Policies and Experts in Scientific Collections Meeting, in Sofia, Bulgaria (12-13 March 2019). &nbsp

The concept of a scientist’s image has been defined in the article. Specific criteria features and functional capabilities of international systems of scientists’ identification have been distinguished and analysed. It has been found out that the registration and creation of profiles in such communication systems is a desirable condition for a scientist’s identification, an effective factor in increasing his professional competence. It has been specified that the mentioned systems provide an effective search for both parallel developers of scientific problems, potential co-authors and opponents and for prospective consumers of their products. At the same time, this is an expanded search for sources of funding for research activities. Emphasis has been placed on the popularization of their own research, the establishment of international relations in order to introduce Ukrainian scientists and the institutions they represented in the world scientific space. The author emphasizes the relevance of promoting the scientific works of domestic scientists to the international and world scientometric databases, which allows not only to share experience, but also to take into account the opinion of foreign researchers for the objectivity of obtaining intermediate and final results of thesis activity and planned research. The author provides a brief description of more popular identifiers (identifier systems), now they are the most important for the scientist's present activities, such as Scopus Author ID, Researcher ID, Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCID), Google Scholar Research Gate; focuses on the need for Crossref registration agencies to provide DOIs (Digital Object Identifiers) for each author’s publication. It is also said in the article that the demonstration and popularization of the scientist's scientific activity takes place through the means of social networks such as Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, etc., У статті визначено поняття іміджу вченого. Проаналізовано й виокремлено певні критеріальні особливості та функціональні можливості міжнародних систем ідентифікації науковців. Встановлено, що реєстрація та створення профілів у таких комунікаційних системах є бажаною умовою ідентифікації вченого, дієвим фактором підвищення його фахової компетентності. З'ясовано, що згадані системи уможливлюють ефективний пошук як паралельних розробників наукової проблематики, потенціальних співавторів та опонентів, так і передбачуваних споживачів наукової продукції. В той же час це й розширений пошук джерел фінансування науково-дослідної діяльності. Акцент зроблено й на популяризації власних досліджень, налагодженні міжнародних зв’язків з метою входження українських науковців та репрезентованих ними установ у світовий науковий простір. Автор наголошує про актуальність просування наукового доробку вітчизняних учених до міжнародних і світових наукометричних баз даних, що дає змогу не тільки ділитися досвідом, а й враховувати думку зарубіжних дослідників задля об'єктивності отримання проміжних і кінцевих результатів дисертаційної діяльності і планових НДР. Автор наводить стислу характеристику більш популярних ідентифікаторів (систем ідентифікаторів), що нині є найбільш важливими для діяльності ученого сьогодення, таких, як: Scopus Author ID ResearcherID Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCID) Google Scholar Research Gate; зосереджує увагу на необхідності присвоєння реєстраційним Crossref агентством ідентифікаторів DOI (Digital Object Identifier) кожній авторськійпублікації. У статті говориться й про те, що демонстрація та популяризація наукової діяльності ученого відбувається засобами соціальних мереж таких, як: Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter та ін.

The GreyGuide - Repository and Portal to Good Practices and Resources in Grey Literature was launched in 2013 as a collaborative effort between GreyNet International and ISTI-CNR, Pisa, Italy. This year GreyGuide celebrates 6 years of work aimed at achieving results in line with the needs of the scientific community. GreyGuide is in continuous evolution both as regards the repository and the portal and will come to serve as GreyNet's web access portal. The GreyGuide manages Open Source Repositories and provides a unique resource in the field of grey literature that is long awaited and which responds to the information needs of a diverse, international grey literature community adhering to Open Science guiding principles. This year activities dealing with the GreyGuide have focused on oupgrading the new version of its Portal; omanaging and upgrading teh portal for the GreyForum Series enabling access to material produced by the speakers; oincluding an ORCID metadata field in the BIO Collection in the GreyGuide Repository; oincluding a DOI metadata field for GL-Conference Papers and RGL Resources in Grey Literaure in the GreyGuide Repository; oAccessGrey Project. GreyGuide is GreyNet's Web Access Portal and Repository With the recent addition of the RGL Collection (Resources in Grey Literature), the acquisition of generic, multidisciplinary, and diverse grey literature documents types is underway. Each new metadata, full-text record is assigned a DOI and system generated citation.

Der Vortrag gibt einen Aus- und Überblick überPIDs für Informationsobjekte im Kontext von Open Science.

Presentation to the EThOS-DataCite UK workshop on 4th December 2017. Providing a background to the Unlocking Theses Data Project and progress on assigning persistent identifiers to doctoral theses in the UK.

This poster was presented at OAI10, 2017 in Geneva, Switzerland. It shows use cases of Persistent Identifiers in High Energy Physics.

Presentation given at THOR Bootcamp Madrid.

International audience; The ORCiD author identifier system is now being implemented by universities across the UK, and by many publishers and funding organisations to help manage researchers' journal articles and other published outputs. Digital object identifiers – DOIs – are also now widely used to uniquely identify research publications.But are ORCiD and DOI identifiers also being used for PhD students and their theses? Or are doctoral theses lagging behind more formally published papers when it comes to identifiers? And if so, why is that?In 2015, the Unlocking Thesis Data project (UTD) brought together the Universities of East London and Southampton, DataCite, and the British Library's EThOS e-theses service, to explore DOIs and ORCiDs for doctoral theses. This paper will describe the level of identifier adoption for research students and theses in the UK, and the work of the UTD project to encourage their use. The project also examined the range of supplementary material and data resulting from doctoral research – and the potential use of identifiers to manage these outputs. As a result of UTD, a small number of UK theses now have DOIs and/or ORCiDs and there are many encouraging signs of wider uptake by universities, students and research organisations.

By their very nature PhD theses break new ground and advance research. They are often the first scholarly output produced by early researchers, and it makes sense to embrace new initiatives like identifiers right at the beginning of the research process. Applying Digital Object Identifiers (DOI) to all theses and encouraging doctoral students to hold an ORCID iD will: - Provide easily citeable theses and data - Grow usage, and support metrics & altmetrics - Embed good data management practice early on - Help track career paths and impact of funding In 2015, the Unlocking Thesis Data project took a snapshot of progress in the application of thesis DOIs and student ORCID iDs across the UK, and recommended some actions for institutions, repository systems, and the British Library's EThOS service.

This document identifies gaps in existing PID infrastructures, with a focus on ORCID and DataCite Metadata and links between contributors, organizations and artefacts. What prevents us from establishing interoperability and overcoming barriers between PID platforms for contributors, artefacts and organisations, and research solutions for federated attribution, claiming, publishing and direct data access? It goes on to propose strategies to overcome these gaps.&nbsp