Search

Leveraging the Follicular Lymphoma Analysis of Surrogacy Hypothesis database of individual patient data from first-line clinical trials, we studied the clinical course of follicular lymphoma (FL) and investigated clinical factors associated with FL outcomes.We examined 2428 patients from 8 randomized trials using multistate survival models with 4 states: induction treatment, progression, death from FL, and death from other causes. We utilized Aalen-Johansen estimator and Cox models to assess the likelihood of FL outcomes and quantify predictors' effects.Two-year progression, FL-related death, and death from other causes estimates were 26.5%, 3.4% and 1.4%, respectively. FL-associated deaths were the primary cause of mortality within 10 years of follow-up. Male sex (hazard ratio: 1.25; 95% confidence interval: 1.05-1.47),4 involved nodal areas (1.51; 1.23-1.86), elevated LDH (1.20; 1.01-1.43), low hemoglobin (1.44; 1.15-1.81), and elevated β-2 levels (1.23; 1.02-1.47) increased risk of progression. CD20-targeting agents reduced risks for progression (0.29; 0.22-0.39), death from FL (0.05; 0.01-0.20), and death from other causes without progression (0.13; 0.05-0.33) and following progression (0.52; 0.30-0.92). Estimated 2-year progression rates were 22.3% and 43.5% with or without CD20-targeting agents, respectively. Two-year FL-associated mortality rate was 8.3% among patients without CD20-targeting agents, 5.4% with B-symptoms, 4.9% with elevated LDH, and 9.1% with low hemoglobin.This study identified independent contributions of baseline clinical factors to distinct outcomes for patients with FL following first-line therapy on a clinical trial. Similar analytical approaches are needed to increase understanding of factors that influence FL outcomes in other settings.

Most patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are diagnosed with early-stage disease and managed with active surveillance. The individual course of patients with early-stage CLL is heterogeneous, and their probability of needing treatment is hardly anticipated at diagnosis. We aimed at developing an international prognostic score to predict time to first treatment (TTFT) in patients with CLL with early, asymptomatic disease (International Prognostic Score for Early-stage CLL [IPS-E]). Individual patient data from 11 international cohorts of patients with early-stage CLL (n = 4933) were analyzed to build and validate the prognostic score. Three covariates were consistently and independently correlated with TTFT: unmutated immunoglobulin heavy variable gene (IGHV), absolute lymphocyte count higher than 15 × 109/L, and presence of palpable lymph nodes. The IPS-E was the sum of the covariates (1 point each), and separated low-risk (score 0), intermediate-risk (score 1), and high-risk (score 2-3) patients showing a distinct TTFT. The score accuracy was validated in 9 cohorts staged by the Binet system and 1 cohort staged by the Rai system. The C-index was 0.74 in the training series and 0.70 in the aggregate of validation series. By meta-analysis of the training and validation cohorts, the 5-year cumulative risk for treatment start was 8.4%, 28.4%, and 61.2% among low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk patients, respectively. The IPS-E is a simple and robust prognostic model that predicts the likelihood of treatment requirement in patients with early-stage CLL. The IPS-E can be useful in clinical management and in the design of early intervention clinical trials.

The overall prognosis of patients with follicular lymphoma has substantially improved over the last decades with a 10-year overall survival of around 80% for the majority of patients. However, for most patients follicular lymphoma it is still a relapsing and remitting disease. Furthermore, certain subsets of patients still have much shorter survival. Currently, there is no established standard how to treat high-risk follicular lymphoma. With advances in the understanding of the biology and pathogenesis of B cell malignancies, a plethora of new compounds have been investigated in FL. These compounds have the potential to increase efficacy if added to current regimens or even replace them. The implementation of these compounds in treatment algorithms is another unsolved issue. This overview highlights major controversies in the treatment of follicular lymphoma and discusses the most recent and relevant clinical trials.

Objective Platinum-based chemotherapy plus the anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody (mAb) cetuximab is used to treat recurrent/metastatic (RM) head-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Recently, we defined Cluster3 gene-expression signature as a potential predictor of favorable progression-free survival (PFS) in cetuximab-treated RM-HNSCC patients and predictor of partial metabolic FDG-PET response in an afatinib window-of-opportunity trial. Another anti-EGFR-mAb (panitumumab) was used as the treatment agent in RM-HNSCC patients in the phase II PANI01trial. PANI01 tumor samples were analyzed using functional genomics to explore response predictors to anti-EGFR therapy. Materials and methods Whole-gene expression and real-time PCR analyses were applied to pre-treatment samples from 25 PANI01 patients. Three gene signatures (Cluster3 score, RAS onco-signature, microenvironment score) and seven selected miRNAs were separately analyzed for association with panitumumab efficacy. Results Cluster3 expression levels had a profile with a significant bimodal separation of samples (P = 3.08 E−13). Higher RAS activation, microenvironment score, and miRNA expression were associated with low-Cluster3 patients. The same biomarkers were separately associated with PFS. Patients with high-Cluster3 had significantly longer PFS than patients with low-Cluster3 (median PFS: 174 versus 51 days; log-rank P = 0.0021). ROC analysis demonstrated accuracy in predicting PFS (AUC = 0.877). Conclusions Despite differences in clinical settings and anti-EGFR inhibitors used for treatment, response prediction by the Cluster3 signature and selected miRNAs was essentially the same. Translation into a useful clinical assay requires validation in a broader setting.

Background The first-line treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the combination of rituximab with CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) chemotherapy, curing approximately 60% of patients. Many clinical trials have been carried out over the last 10 years trying to improve the results of this treatment, but the appropriateness of their planning strategies could be rediscussed. Patients and methods Reports of phase III trials evaluating the addition of molecularly targeted agents or new monoclonal antibodies to the classic R-CHOP backbone in first-line induction or maintenance treatment were reviewed. The trial design, primary end point, number of patients enrolled, patient selection criteria, treatment schedule and results were registered for each one. In addition, the phases I and II trials which preceded these phase III trials were also reviewed. Results Among six phase III trials with results, only one trial evaluating lenalidomide maintenance after response to R-CHOP induction was positive and reached its primary end point. The other five trials did not show an improved outcome with the addition of the new agent. The preceding phases I and II trials were very heterogeneous in their end points and design. Even though most of these trials were considered positive, thus encouraging further investigation, so far they failed to predict the results of the subsequent phase III trials. Conclusion The standard of care for DLBCL is still R-CHOP. Phase I/II trials failed to predict the results of subsequent phase III trials evaluating non-chemotherapeutic agents added to R-CHOP. The methodology of phase II trials evaluating new agents in DLBCL needs to be better defined in the future.

Background With the introduction of the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab, the outcome of patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) has greatly improved over the last two decades. First-line prolonged rituximab monotherapy is effective, achieving long-term remission and prolonged failure-free survival in some patients. Additionally, rituximab has been shown to synergize with chemotherapeutic and novel targeted agents alike with measurable gains in duration of response. As such, rituximab has made its mark in the treatment of FL and remains a valid agent despite the availability of newer monoclonal antibodies. This review summarizes the evolving role of rituximab as the first available anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, emphasizing its clear activity as a single agent and in combination with chemotherapy or molecular targeted agents, and setting the standard for the development of new anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies. Conclusion We provide data that support the ongoing use of rituximab as a therapeutic partner for novel agents in future clinical trials exploring chemotherapy-free alternatives.

Standard conditioning regimens for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) are often not tolerated by elderly patients, on one hand. Single high-dose melphalan, on the other hand, has been shown to be safe and active as a pretransplant preparative regimen in elderly patients. Y90 -Ibritumomab tiuxetan (Y90 -IT) is well tolerated and feasible in the transplantation setting. We therefore investigated the combination of high-dose melphalan and Y90 -IT as a conditioning regimen for patients ≥65 years of age. Patients with relapsed or resistant CD20-positive lymphoma in remission after salvage chemotherapy could be enrolled. High-dose therapy consisted of standard dose Y90 -IT (0.4-mCi/kg body weight) followed by melphalan at escalating doses (100, 140, 170 and 200 mg/m2 ) and ASCT. The primary objective was to identify the maximum tolerated dose; secondary end points were complete response (CR) rate 100 days after transplantation and toxicity. Twenty patients (median age 72 years) were included. No DLT occurred at any dose level. Thirteen patients completed the treatment, 11 were evaluable for response. Seven patients did not complete treatment because of mobilization failure (n = 3), progressive disease (n = 2), worsening of cardiac function (n = 1), and grade 3 dyspnea (n = 1). Seven patients achieved a CR/complete remission/unconfirmed (CRu) and 2 had stable disease. Five out of 7 responding patients were still alive more than 3 years after transplantation. The 2 patients with SD had a long-term survival of 3 and 5 years, respectively. Nonhematological grade 3 or higher treatment related adverse events (AEs) were infection (n = 6), including 2 cases of febrile neutropenia, diarrhea (n = 3), mucositis, anorexia, viral hepatitis, hypokalemia, dehydration, and multiorgan failure (n = 1 for each). The combination of Y90 -IT and high-dose melphalan is feasible before ASCT for elderly patients, with promising activity and manageable toxicity.

Introduction: Most patients with newly diagnosed FL treated with rituximab (R) alone or R + chemotherapy will experience prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival (OS), but it remains unclear what factors have the greatest influence on FL-associated and other causes of death in this patient population. We utilized individual patient data from 13 first-line randomized clinical trials from the FLASH database to perform a comprehensive multistate survival analysis to examine and quantify the relationships between clinical characteristics, treatment response, and early, intermediate, and late FL outcomes. Methods: The multistate survival analysis model defined states for "Alive after beginning Induction Treatment (TX)", "Alive after beginning Maintenance TX", "Death due to FL", and "Death from Other Causes" (Figure 1). We used the Aalen-Johansen estimator, a generalization of the Kaplan-Meier estimator, to calculate the likelihood of being in each model state and estimate the course of FL over time. Making no assumptions on the probability distributions and capable of coping with censored observations, the Aalen-Johansen estimator is a convenient and reliable nonparametric estimator for clinical data. Results: Among 7,465 FL patients with median age 56 (range 18-90) years, 49.2% were female; 28.7% Stage I-III, 71.3% Stage IV, and FLIPI was 0-1 (20.0%), 2 (36.8%), ≥ 3 (43.2%). Following initiation of induction treatment, 2-, 5- and 10-year death rates were 1.7%, 3.8%, and 5.8% due to FL, and 0.7%, 2.1%, and 4.8% from other causes (Figure 2). Death rates at 2, 5, and 10 years due to FL and other causes for subgroups based on clinical characteristics and treatment response are shown in Table 1. Notably, patients > 70 years and patients with FLIPI ≥ 3 had worse outcomes and patients achieving CR at 18, 24, and 30 months experienced improved outcomes. Conclusion: This is the largest study using data from randomized trials to quantify the impact of clinical factors on early, intermediate and late mortality by cause of death. We demonstrated that age > 70 years and FLIPI ≥ 3 were linked to increased FL-associated death and response to TX distinguished patients with favorable and poor outcomes. Future analyses should quantify the impact of predictors on the rate/time of FL outcomes in multivariable models. Disclosures Salles: Roche, Janssen, Gilead, Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Educational events; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Educational events; BMS: Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis, Servier, AbbVie, Karyopharm, Kite, MorphoSys: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Educational events; Epizyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; Autolus: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Educational events. Hoster:Janssen: Research Funding; Roche Pharma AG: Other: Travel Support. Hiddemann:Bayer: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Vector Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Herold:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Morschhauser:Servier: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Janssen: Honoraria; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy; BMS: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Rummel:Roche Pharma AG: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Sandoz: Honoraria. Kimby:AbbVie,: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jansen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Other: educational lectures. Vitolo:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Juno Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Gyan:Pfizer: Honoraria. Ladetto:Celgene: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Acerta: Honoraria; Sandoz: Honoraria. Nielsen:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Employment, Equity Ownership. Flowers:AstraZeneca: Consultancy; BeiGene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group: Research Funding; Burroughs Wellcome Fund: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Optimum Rx: Consultancy; V Foundation: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics/Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Denovo Biopharma: Consultancy; Acerta: Research Funding; National Cancer Institute: Research Funding; Millenium/Takeda: Research Funding; Genentech, Inc./F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy

In the last decades, the survival of many patients with cancer improved thanks to modern diagnostic methods and progresses in therapy. Still for several tumours, especially when diagnosed at an advanced stage, the benefits of treatment in terms of increased survival or quality of life are at best modest when not marginal, and should be weighed against the potential discomfort caused by medical procedures. As in other specialties, in oncology as well the dialogue between doctor and patient should be encouraged about the potential overuse of diagnostic procedures or treatments. Several oncological societies produced recommendations similar to those proposed by other medical disciplines adhering to the Choosing Wisely (CW) campaign. In this review, we describe what was reported in the medical literature concerning adequacy of screening, diagnostic, treatment and follow-up procedures and the potential impact on them of the CW. We only marginally touch on the more complex topic of treatment appropriateness, for which several evaluation methods have been developed (including the European Society for Medical Oncology-magnitude of clinical benefit scale). Finally, we review the possible obstacles for the development of CW in the oncological setting and focus on the strategies which could allow CW to evolve in the cancer field, so as to enhance the therapeutic relationship between medical professionals and patients and promote more appropriate management.

Summary Background We previously reported the 5-year results of the phase 3 IBCSG 23-01 trial comparing disease-free survival in patients with breast cancer with one or more micrometastatic (≤2 mm) sentinel nodes randomly assigned to either axillary dissection or no axillary dissection. The results showed no difference in disease-free survival between the groups and showed non-inferiority of no axillary dissection relative to axillary dissection. The current analysis presents the results of the study after a median follow-up of 9·7 years (IQR 7·8–12·7). Methods In this multicentre, randomised, controlled, open-label, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial, participants were recruited from 27 hospitals and cancer centres in nine countries. Eligible women could be of any age with clinical, mammographic, ultrasonographic, or pathological diagnosis of breast cancer with largest lesion diameter of 5 cm or smaller, and one or more metastatic sentinel nodes, all of which were 2 mm or smaller and with no extracapsular extension. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) before surgery (mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery) to no axillary dissection or axillary dissection using permuted blocks generated by a web-based congruence algorithm, with stratification by centre and menopausal status. The protocol-specified primary endpoint was disease-free survival, analysed in the intention-to-treat population (as randomly assigned). Safety was assessed in all randomly assigned patients who received their allocated treatment (as treated). We did a one-sided test for non-inferiority of no axillary dissection by comparing the observed hazard ratios (HRs) for disease-free survival with a margin of 1·25. This 10-year follow-up analysis was not prespecified in the trial's protocol and thus was not adjusted for multiple, sequential testing. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00072293. Findings Between April 1, 2001, and Feb 8, 2010, 6681 patients were screened and 934 randomly assigned to no axillary dissection (n=469) or axillary dissection (n=465). Three patients were ineligible and were excluded from the trial after randomisation. Disease-free survival at 10 years was 76·8% (95% CI 72·5–81·0) in the no axillary dissection group, compared with 74·9% (70·5–79·3) in the axillary dissection group (HR 0·85, 95% CI 0·65–1·11; log-rank p=0·24; p=0·0024 for non-inferiority). Long-term surgical complications included lymphoedema of any grade in 16 (4%) of 453 patients in the no axillary dissection group and 60 (13%) of 447 in the axillary dissection group, sensory neuropathy of any grade in 57 (13%) in the no axillary dissection group versus 85 (19%) in the axillary dissection group, and motor neuropathy of any grade (14 [3%] in the no axillary dissection group vs 40 [9%] in the axillary dissection group). One serious adverse event (postoperative infection and inflamed axilla requiring hospital admission) was attributed to axillary dissection; the event resolved without sequelae. Interpretation The findings of the IBCSG 23-01 trial after a median follow-up of 9·7 years (IQR 7·8–12·7) corroborate those obtained at 5 years and are consistent with those of the 10-year follow-up analysis of the Z0011 trial. Together, these findings support the current practice of not doing an axillary dissection when the tumour burden in the sentinel nodes is minimal or moderate in patients with early breast cancer. Funding International Breast Cancer Study Group.

Background Randomised trials of rituximab maintenance (MR) for patients with follicular lymphoma support improved progression-free survival (PFS), but the effect on overall survival has been inconclusive. To evaluate the effect of MR on overall survival according to patient and disease characteristics, and to explore certain adverse events, we performed an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis. Methods All investigators of randomised controlled trials that compared MR therapy with observation or treatment only at relapse (no MR) for patients with follicular lymphoma were invited to participate in an IPD meta-analysis. We obtained baseline patient and disease characteristics and time to progression and death for each patient. All analyses took into account the trial and original randomised treatment group. We analysed data in two ways: a two-stage analysis and a multivariate model including patient and disease characteristics. Findings Seven trials including 2315 patients were analysed. Overall survival of patients improved with MR compared with no MR (hazard ratio [HR] 0.79, 95% CI 0.66–0.96). We could not detect any patient or disease characteristics that were associated with a survival benefit with MR. In all of the models, MR had a beneficial effect on overall survival compared with observation for all types of patients, which was not shown in a particular subgroup in which the patient had already received rituximab in the induction phase and received first-line therapy. MR improved PFS compared with observation (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.51–0.64). The risk of adverse events was higher with MR, specifically infection of any grade and grade 3–4 infections. Interpretation Based on IPD from randomised controlled trials, MR improves overall survival consistently in all patients, regardless of patient and disease characteristics when compared with observation, and should be prescribed after a successful induction with R-CVP or R-CHOP for patients with follicular lymphoma. It is still uncertain if that holds when the patient has already received rituximab in his/hers first induction. The effect of MR after bendamustine-rituximab induction compared with rituximab at progression should be further explored.

Purpose Follicular lymphoma (FL) is an indolent cancer, with effective but rarely curative treatment options. As a standard study end point for first-line FL therapy, progression-free survival (PFS) requires extended follow-up (median PFS, > 7 years). To provide patients with earlier access to newer therapies, an earlier end point to expedite clinical trials is needed. Our objective was to formally assess the complete response rate at 30 months (CR30) after initiation of induction therapy as a potential surrogate end point for PFS in first-line FL therapy. Patients and Methods We analyzed individual patient data from 13 randomized multicenter trials of induction and maintenance regimens in first-line FL therapy published after 1990 and with sufficient data to evaluate whether CR30 could predict treatment effects on PFS. Correlation of the CR30 odds ratio with the PFS hazard ratio was evaluated by both linear regression (R2WLS) and bivariate copula (R2Copula) models. Prespecified criteria for surrogacy required either R2WLS or R2Copula ≥ 0.80, with a lower-bound 95% CI > 0.60. Results Data from eight induction and five maintenance randomized trials in 3,837 evaluable patients were analyzed. The prespecified surrogacy threshold was met, with an R2WLS of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.77 to 0.96) and an R2Copula of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.72 to 1.00). Multiple sensitivity and supplemental analyses supported the robustness of the findings. A minimum 11% absolute improvement in CR30 from a 50% control rate predicted a significant treatment effect on PFS (hazard ratio, 0.69). Conclusion This large, prospective, pooled analysis of randomized chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and chemoimmunotherapy trials demonstrates that CR30 is a surrogate end point for PFS in first-line FL treatment trials. Use of this end point may expedite therapeutic development with the intent of bringing novel therapies to this patient population years before PFS results are mature.

The role of both autologous (autoSCT) and allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) in the management of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) remains to be clarified. We conducted a consensus project using the RAND-modified Delphi consensus procedure to provide guidance on how SCT should be used in MCL. With regard to autoSCT, there was consensus in support of: autoSCT is the standard first-line consolidation therapy; induction therapy should include high-dose cytarabine and Rituximab; complete or partial remission should be achieved before autoSCT; Rituximab maintenance following autoSCT is not indicated; and omission of autoSCT in 'low-risk' patients is not indicated. No consensus could be reached regarding: autoSCT in the treatment of relapsed disease following non-transplant therapy; the value of positron emission tomography scanning and minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring; in vivo purging with Rituximab; total body irradiation conditioning for autoSCT; and preemptive Rituximab after autoSCT. For alloSCT, consensus was reached in support of: alloSCT should be considered for patients relapsing after autoSCT; reduced intensity conditioning regimens should be used; allogeneic immunotherapy should be used for MRD eradication after alloSCT; and there is a lack of prognostic criteria to guide the use of alloSCT as first-line consolidation. No consensus was reached regarding the role of alloSCT for relapsed disease following non-transplant therapy.

Rituximab (R) is an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody which has become an essential component for the treatment of B-cell lymphomas. When associated to chemotherapy it improves the outcome of the patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, and other lymphoproliferative diseases in comparison to chemotherapy alone. For patients with newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma achieving at least a partial response to initial immuno-chemotherapy, maintenance R was associated with an improvement in progression-free survival and a meta-analysis of randomized maintenance trials suggests an overall survival advantage. The role of maintenance R in other indolent diseases is less well-defined. In this article, we summarize the data available for this strategy in less frequent subtypes of indolent B-cell lymphomas.

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is one of the lymphomas with the worse prognosis (median survival 3-5years) as it has an aggressive evolution and at the same time is incurable. Biologically it is characterized by the t(11;14)(q13;q32) translocation leading to overexpression of cyclin D1. This review focuses on a number of controversial issues in the management of this disease, as how to stage patients with a disease which often has extranodal localizations, how to recognize the small subgroup of cases with an indolent course, which treatment is suggested for the young and fit or for the elderly, the role of CNS prophylaxis, rituximab maintenance and radiotherapy, the indications to allogeneic transplantation and the place of new active anti-lymphoma drugs.

For patients with advanced indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) or elderly patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), the recently reported results of the German StiL NHL-1 2003 and the international BRIGHT phase III trials showed that, as first-line treatment, the combination of bendamustine and rituximab is at least as effective as rituximab/cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone or rituximab/cyclophosphamide/vincristine/prednisone, possibly with a better therapeutic index. Bendamustine is therefore increasingly used in clinical practice. Because bendamustine has been used for many years in Germany and in Switzerland, our institutions have had extensive experience with bendamustine, both as a single agent and in combination with rituximab. In this comprehensive review, we summarize the most important clinical data from phase II/III trials with bendamustine in patients with indolent NHL and MCL, both in the relapsed/refractory setting and in the first-line setting. In addition, this review provides practical advice on how to optimally manage bendamustine therapy in patients with NHL.

The aim of this project was to define indications for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in follicular lymphoma in Europe. In the absence of evidence-based data, a RAND-modified Delphi procedure was used by an expert panel. After pre-defining statements, these were individually/anonymously scored by each participant using a 9-point scale. Consensus was reached that: 1) high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell rescue is not an appropriate option to consolidate first remission in patients responding to immuno-chemotherapy outside clinical trials; 2) in patients with first chemo-sensitive relapse, high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell rescue is an appropriate option to consolidate remission, especially in patients with a short response after immuno-chemotherapy or with high-risk FLIPI; 3) high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell rescue is also appropriate in second/subsequent chemo-sensitive relapses; 4) allotransplant (preferably a reduced intensity conditioning-allotransplant) should be considered at relapse after high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell rescue. No consensus was reached on the role of high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell rescue in low-risk first relapse, or on when an allotransplant should be preferred over high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell rescue. In the absence of evidence-based data, the consensus method used was a valuable tool to define indications for hematopoietic stem cell transplant in follicular lymphoma.

Central nervous system (CNS) relapse has not been extensively studied in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). We retrospectively analyzed the risk factors and pattern of CNS relapse in consecutive patients with MCL. We identified 142 cases of MCL treated from 1980 to 2011. Median age at diagnosis was 68 years; 82% of patients had advanced stage; extranodal disease was reported in 89% of cases and high serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in 40%. Fourteen patients (10%) did not receive treatment at diagnosis. Chemotherapy was administered to 125 patients (88%), in 21 cases (15%) including drugs penetrating into the CNS or given intrathecally; 49 patients (35%) had rituximab. Ten patients had front-line autologous transplant. After a median follow-up of 7.9 years, CNS relapse occurred in 11 cases (7.8%) at a median of 13.8 months. Actuarial risk of CNS relapse was higher in patients with elevated LDH (p = 0.002), higher International Prognostic Index (IPI) score (p = 0.018) and blastoid histology (p < 0.0001). Blastoid histology retained significance at multivariate analysis. Median survival after CNS relapse was 6.3 months. No front-line treatment reduced the risk of CNS relapse. Our analysis confirms the poor outcome of MCL after CNS relapse and may allow the identification of patients needing prophylaxis of CNS relapse.

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most prevalent indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Most patients present with advanced disease and are incurable with current therapy. The approval of rituximab has revolutionized the treatment of follicular lymphoma when administered in the induction setting for high-tumor burden disease, but the use of rituximab as a maintenance therapy (MR) continues to be a point of controversy. In this article, we review the main data and arguments in favor and against MR in FL. In summary, most studies have demonstrated a significant benefit in progression-free or event-free survival in this notoriously recurrent disease; however, long-term outcomes could not consistently demonstrate to be improved with this intervention. In a meta-analysis of randomized trials overall survival (OS) showed a tendency to improvement when given to patients in relapse, but no single study reached a significant OS advantage. The risk of high-grade transformation does not seem to be reduced in prospective trials. On the other hand, MR clearly increases toxicity without an improvement in quality of life. Finally, MR is expensive, and it is not proven that the delayed relapse time can compensate for these costs. In conclusion, despite the proven increase in progression-free survival, MR can't be recommended as a standard for the treatment of FL.

Rituximab improved the prognosis of all B-cell derived lymphoproliferative diseases, but despite 20years of intensive use, it remains a drug with a number of still obscure characteristics and unanswered questions. These include the mechanism of action and of resistance, the optimal schedule, the interaction with chemotherapy, as well as predictive factors for response rate and duration. Despite being very well tolerated, the question of its long term side effects and the risks of the administration near to a pregnancy have only recently been addressed. Also the indications are still not all clear: rituximab induces remissions as a single agent and improves the effect of chemotherapy, but its use as maintenance or as a substitute for watch and wait is still debated. Also, it is still unclear if its efficacy derives at least partly by reducing the risk of histological transformation in indolent NHL and reducing the risk of CNS relapse in aggressive NHL. Finally, despite of 20years of research, it is still unclear if rituximab can be efficiently substituted by biosimilars or new anti-CD20 antibodies. In this review we address all these questions and analyze the literature addressing these aspects.

Purpose Rituximab maintenance therapy has been shown to improve progression-free survival in patients with follicular lymphoma; however, the optimal duration of maintenance treatment remains unknown. Patients and Methods Two hundred seventy patients with untreated, relapsed, stable, or chemotherapy-resistant follicular lymphoma were treated with four doses of rituximab monotherapy in weekly intervals (375 mg/m2). Patients achieving at least a partial response were randomly assigned to receive maintenance therapy with one infusion of rituximab every 2 months, either on a short-term schedule (four administrations) or a long-term schedule (maximum of 5 years or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity). The primary end point was event-free survival (EFS). Progression-free survival, overall survival (OS), and toxicity were secondary end points. Comparisons between the two arms were performed using the log-rank test for survival end points. Results One hundred sixty-five patients were randomly assigned to the short-term (n = 82) or long-term (n = 83) maintenance arms. Because of the low event rate, the final analysis was performed after 95 events had occurred, which was before the targeted event number of 99 had been reached. At a median follow-up period of 6.4 years, the median EFS was 3.4 years (95% CI, 2.1 to 5.3) in the short-term arm and 5.3 years (95% CI, 3.5 to not available) in the long-term arm (P = .14). Patients in the long-term arm experienced more adverse effects than did those in the short-term arm, with 76% v 50% of patients with at least one adverse event (P < .001), five versus one patient with grade 3 and 4 infections, and three versus zero patients discontinuing treatment because of unacceptable toxicity, respectively. There was no difference in OS between the two groups. Conclusion Long-term rituximab maintenance therapy does not improve EFS, which was the primary end point of this trial, or OS, and was associated with increased toxicity.

Background Follicular lymphoma is characterized by slow growth and an initially high rate of response to treatment, but patients typically relapse and experience progressive disease. Rituximab in combination with chemotherapy has been shown to improve overall survival in patients with follicular lymphoma compared with chemotherapy alone, but data from randomized clinical trials evaluating rituximab maintenance treatment in these patients are limited. We aimed to evaluate the effect of maintenance treatment with rituximab on the overall survival of patients with follicular lymphoma. Methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared rituximab maintenance therapy with observation or treatment at relapse (no maintenance therapy). We searched The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, LILACS, conference proceedings, databases of ongoing trials, and references of published trials. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of the trials and extracted data. Hazard ratios for time-to-event data were estimated and pooled. Results Five trials including 1143 adult patients were included in this meta-analysis. Data for 985 patients with follicular lymphoma were available for the meta-analysis of overall survival. Patients treated with maintenance rituximab had statistically significantly better overall survival than patients in the observation arm or patients treated at relapse (hazard ratio [HR] for death = 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.45 to 0.79). The rate of infection-related adverse events was higher with rituximab maintenance treatment (HR = 1.99, 95% CI = 1.21 to 3.27). Patients with refractory or relapsed (ie, previously treated) follicular lymphoma had a survival benefit with maintenance rituximab therapy (HR for death = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.42 to 0.79), whereas previously untreated patients did not (HR for death = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.37 to 1.25). Conclusions These results suggest that maintenance therapy with rituximab, either as four weekly infusions every 6 months or as a single infusion every 2-3 months, should be added to standard therapy for patients with relapsed or refractory (ie, previously treated) follicular lymphoma after successful induction therapy. The higher rate of infections with rituximab therapy should be taken into consideration when making treatment decisions.

This trial was aimed to explore the efficacy of pegfilgrastim to accelerate neutrophil engraftment after stem cell autotransplant. Twenty patients with multiple myeloma and 20 with lymphoma received pegfilgrastim 6 mg on day +1. Forty cases treated with daily filgrastim starting at median day +7 (5-7), matched by age, sex, diagnosis, high-dose chemotherapy schedule, CD34 + cell-dose, and prior therapy lines, were used for comparison. Median time to neutrophil engraftment was 9.5 vs. 11 days for pegfilgrastim and filgrastim, respectively (p0.0001). Likewise, duration of neutropenia, intravenous antibiotic use, and hospitalization favored pegfilgrastim, while platelet engraftment, transfusion requirement, and fever duration were equivalent in both groups. No grade ≥ 3 toxicities were observed. Patients with lymphoma performed similarly to the entire cohort, while patients with myeloma showed faster neutrophil engraftment and shorter neutropenia but not shorter hospitalization and antibiotic use. The possibility of different outcomes for lymphoma and myeloma suggests that stratification by diagnosis may be useful in future phase III studies.

e18065Background: Previous studies suggested that cisplatin and cetuximab administered concurrently to radiotherapy (RT) improve only marginally the outcome of patients older than 65 years. Methods...

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) has a poor prognosis with often short and incomplete remissions. We aimed to test the efficacy and tolerability of gemcitabine in treating MCL. Gemcitabine was given in doses of 1000 mg/m(2) as a 30 min infusion on days 1 and 8 of each 3 week cycle for a maximum of nine cycles. Eighteen patients with a median age of 70 years were recruited. MCL was newly diagnosed in half of patients and relapsed in the remainder. Fifteen patients had Ann Arbor stage IV. The best-recorded responses were 1 CR (complete remission), 4 PRs (partial responses), 8 SDs (stable diseases) and 4 PDs (diseases progression). The response rate (RR) (CR + PR) was 5 (28%; 95% confidence interval: 7.1, 48.5). The patient achieving a CR had stage IV disease. Most haematological adverse events occurred during the first chemotherapy cycle. Three patients developed non-haematological serious adverse events: dyspnea, glomerular microangiopathy with haemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) and hyperglycaemia. The median time-to-progression and treatment response duration (TRD) was 8.0 (95% confidence interval: 5.5, 9.3) and 10.6 (95% confidence interval: 5.5, 10.9) months, respectively. We conclude that Gemcitabine is well tolerated, moderately active and can induce disease stabilization in patients with MCL.

Esophageal localization of adenoid cystic carcinoma of minor salivary glands is rare; it may occur in the early to mid-sixties' age group and is more frequently encountered in men than women. In the majority of cases, it arises from subepithelial glands of the middle to lower third of the esophagus, a similar distribution as squamous cell carcinoma. Prognosis depends mostly on tumor staging and resectability, which represents the only chance of cure. Due to the extreme rarity of this condition, there is limited experience with systemic therapy for advanced disease. We report a case of a patient with metastatic primary esophageal adenoid cystic carcinoma progressing on platinum- and irinotecan-based regimens, who achieved an objective response with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in combination with cetuximab.

Aims and background To evaluate the outcome of adult patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia in the Italian-speaking part of Switzerland and to identify prognostic factors, time to progression and overall survival. Methods and study design Data of all adult patients diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia from January 1984 to December 2003 were collected retrospectively. Univariate and multivariate analysis for time to progression and overall survival were performed. Results The incidence of acute myeloid leukemia in the adult population in southern Switzerland is 2.6/100,000 per year. Complete clinical and pathological data and follow-up information were available for 128 patients. The median age was 67 years (range, 18 to 94). The median follow-up was 97 months. Median overall survival was 6 months, with a 2-year overall survival of 16%. Median time to progression was 3 months. Thirty-five patients (median age, 80 years) were given best supportive care and/or palliative chemotherapy. The median survival in this subset was 2 months. Of the 93 patients treated with a curative intent, 48 were older than 60 years. The complete remission rate after induction chemotherapy was 80% for patients younger than 60 years and 31% for those older than 60 years (P 1 (P = 0.001) and treatment given before/after 1993 (P = 0.044) were found to be independent prognostic factors for both overall survival and time to progression. Conclusions Most patients with acute myeloid leukemia are older than 60 years, and their outcome is still disappointing. For younger patients, the prognosis is better if they receive high-dose cytarabine as post-remission therapy and if they are treated in the setting of a clinical trial.

Purpose: This phase I infusion rate escalation trial was undertaken to evaluate the maximum applicable infusion rate for rituximab without steroid premedication in patients having received one previous rituximab infusion. Experimental Design: Cohorts of at least three patients were assigned to rituximab with or without concomitant chemotherapy. The initial infusion rate was 200 mg/h in the first cohort, and was increased by 100 mg/h in each subsequent cohort to a maximum of 700 mg/h. In each patient the infusion rate was increased by 100 mg/h every 30 minutes to the total dose (375 mg/m2). In the first six cohorts (21 patients), two well-tolerated rituximab administrations were required; in the 7th cohort (11 patients) one previously well-tolerated rituximab infusion was required. Patients did not receive steroid premedication and were monitored with electrocardiograms (ECG), echocardiograms, Holter ECGs, troponin, and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP). Results: Thirty-two patients were included and 128 cycles were done, 85 at a rate of 700 mg/h. Patients tolerated infusion rates without major side effects. There were no new clinically relevant ECG alterations. Troponin (< 0.1 ng/L) and mean cardiac ejection fraction (65%) remained in the reference range; BNP baseline level increased significantly 24 hours after rituximab administration (from 30.4 to 64.1 ng/L; P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Rituximab can be administered safely at 700 mg/h without steroid premedication in patients having received at least one rituximab dose in the previous 3 months.

Background Addition of the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab to chemotherapy improves response rates and survival in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). However, rituximab induces a transient B-cell depletion and a dose-dependent T-cell inactivation that could impair T-cell immunosurveillance. The impact of rituximab on second primary malignancy (SPM) risk remains unclear so far. We thus carried out a systematic review to compare SPM risk among patients treated or not with rituximab. Patients and methods We retrieved trials from MEDLINE and EMBASE and updated data presented at American Society of Hematology and American Society of Clinical Oncology meetings from 1998 to 2013. We selected randomized, controlled trials addressing newly or relapsed/progressive B-cell NHL in which randomization arms differed only from rituximab administration. Two authors extracted data and assessed the study quality. Results We analyzed nine trials involving 4621 patients. At a median follow-up of 73 months, a total of 169 SPMs were observed in patients randomized to rituximab compared with 165 SPMs in patients not randomized to rituximab (OR = 0.88; 95% CI 0.66–1.19). The proportion of females, histology subtypes, use of rituximab in first line or in maintenance did not influence SPM risk (P = 0.94, P = 0.80, P = 0.87, P = 0.87, respectively). Cumulative exposure through prolonged administration in trials with rituximab maintenance did not contribute to an increased risk of SPM (P = 0.86). Conclusion Our meta-analysis suggests no SPM predisposition among NHL survivors exposed to rituximab at a median follow-up of 6 years.

The outcome of patients with follicular lymphoma has substantially improved in recent years, mainly due to the widespread use of the monoclonal antibody rituximab and partially due to autologous and allogeneic transplantation, and the introduction of new drugs and to the improvement in diagnostic accuracy. The choice of therapy is still based on patient characteristics, extension of disease and clinical prognostic factors. The majority of patients in need of treatment are still treated with cytotoxic agents in combination with rituximab; nevertheless a number of new agents, which are active in this disease, have recently been developed. It has yet to be determined, whether they will partly or completely replace chemotherapy in the near future. This review focuses on the role and the choice of chemotherapy in different clinical situations of follicular lymphoma, in a time when chemotherapy-free treatment becomes more and more of a topic of discussion.

Background: This study was aimed at investigating the clinical features and outcomes of follicular lymphoma ( FL) patients younger than 40 years, which have not been extensively investigated yet. Patients and methods: One hundred and fifty- five patients younger than 40 years were retrospectively studied from a series of 1002 FL patients diagnosed in four different European Oncology Centres ( Barcelona, Spain; Bellinzona, Switzerland; London, UK; Novara, Italy) from 1985 to 2010. Results: Patients younger than 40 had a lower incidence of elevated LDH, high beta2- microglobulin, and a high- risk Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index ( FLIPI) score, whereas bone marrow involvement and bulky and disseminated lymphadenopathy were more frequent. At a median follow- up of 10 years, younger patients, in comparison with those older than 40, had significantly better overall ( OS), cause- specific survival ( CSS), and progression- free survival ( PFS), with 10- year OS rate of 81% versus 51% ( P < 0.0001), 10- year CSS rate of 82% versus 60% ( P < 0.0001), and 10- year PFS of 39% versus 24% ( P = 0.0098). However, there were no significant CSS and PFS differences in comparison with the patients aged 40- 60. In multivariate analysis, having the lymphoma diagnosed in the last two decades and a favourable FLIPI score were associated with a significantly longer PFS and CSS in younger patients, whereas only FLIPI retained statistical significance for OS. Conclusions: In our series, FL patients younger than 40 have a median OS of 24 years and their outcome seems to be improving over time. However, they still have a significantly shorter life expectancy than that of an age- matched general healthy population.

Purpose To evaluate the effect of single-agent rituximab given at the standard or a prolonged schedule in patients with newly diagnosed, or refractory or relapsed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Patients and Methods After induction treatment with the standard schedule (375 mg/m2 weekly × 4), patients who were responding or who had stable disease at week 12 from the start of treatment were randomly assigned to no further treatment (arm A) or prolonged rituximab administration (375 mg/m2) every 8 weeks for four times (arm B). Results The trial enrolled 104 patients. After induction, clinical response was 27% with 2% complete responses. Among patients with detectable t(11;14)-positive cells in blood and bone marrow at baseline, four of 20, and one of 14, respectively, became polymerase chain-reaction–negative after induction. Anemia was the only adverse predictor of response in the multivariate analysis. After a median follow-up of 29 months, response rate and duration of response were not significantly different between the two schedules in 61 randomly assigned patients. Median event-free survival (EFS) was 6 months in arm A versus 12 months in arm B; the difference was not significant (P = .1). Prolonged treatment seemed to improve EFS in the subgroup of pretreated patients (5 months in arm A v 11 months in arm B; P = .04). Thirteen percent of patients in arm A and 9% in arm B presented with grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicity. Conclusion Single-agent rituximab is active in MCL, but the addition of four single doses at 8-week intervals does not seem to significantly improve response rate, duration of response, or EFS after treatment with the standard schedule.

We retrospectively analysed toxicities and clinical results of 61 Hodgkin's lymphoma patients treated with chlorambucil, vinblastine, procarbazine, doxorubicin, bleomycin, vincristine and etoposide (ChlVPP/ABVVP), delivered in a weekly alternate schedule. Of 61 patients, 33 were in stages III-IV, 21 in stage IIB and seven in stage IIA with bulky disease or extranodal presentation. ChlVPP/ABVVP was administered for 6-8 cycles. Involved field radiotherapy (IFRT) (30-35 Gy) was delivered to 31 patients with residual disease after chemotherapy or bulky disease at diagnosis. Of 61 patients, 58 (95%) achieved complete clinical or radiological remission after chemotherapy and IFRT. With a median follow-up of 60 months, 5-year overall survival, relapse- and event-free survival were 78.8% (95% CI 68.2-91.1%), 81% (95% CI 70.6-92.2%) and 71.9% (95% CI 68.2-82.2%) respectively. Grades 3-4 neutropenia was the most relevant haematological toxicity and occurred in 82% of patients. Non-haematological toxicities were mild and reversible. No toxic deaths were recorded. One patient developed secondary acute myeloid leukaemia 1 year after ChlVPP/ABVVP. Due to the retrospective nature of this study, no definitive conclusions could be drawn about the clinical activity of ChlVPP/ABVVP. Nonetheless, clinical results seem better than those reported with standard regimens [ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vincristine, dacarbazine), MOPP (methotrexate, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone), MOPP/ABVD] and as good as those reported using standard or escalated BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine and prednisone), with a lower degree of haematological and non-haematological toxicity. Long-term results of the ongoing randomized trial, comparing ABVD versus high-dose intensity weekly regimens will be useful to confirm our results.

A haematotoxicity model was proposed by Parchment in 1998 to predict the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) in humans of myelosuppressive antitumour agents by combining data from in vitro clonogenic assays on haematopoietic progenitors and in vivo systemic exposure data in animals. A prospective validation of this model in humans was performed with PNU-159548, a novel agent showing selective dose-limiting myelosuppression in animals. PNU-159548 and its main metabolite, PNU-169884, were tested in vitro on murine, canine and human colony forming units-granulocyte macrophages (CFU-GM) and in vivo on mice and dogs. The IC(90x) ratios (IC(x)=concentration inhibiting x% of colony growth) for CFU-GM and drug plasma protein binding were used to adjust the target plasma concentrations versus time curve (AUC) and predict the human MTD. The predicted MTD was compared with values achieved in phase I studies. Canine CFU-GM were 6-fold more sensitive (P0.01) and murine CFU-GM 1.7-fold less sensitive (P0.05) to PNU-159548 treatment than the human progenitors. PNU-169884 behaved similarly to PNU-159548. The predicted MTDs in humans calculated from data in mice and dogs were 15 and 38 mg/m(2), respectively. Overall, 61 patients were treated in two phase I studies, at doses ranging from 1.0 to 16 mg/m(2). Thrombocytopenia was dose-limiting with a MTD of 14 and 16 mg/m(2) in heavily and minimally pretreated/non-pretreated patients, respectively. Adjusting animal MTD data by means of the CFU-GM ratio between species can predict the human MTD with a good quantitative accuracy. Inhibition of common haemopoietic progenitors by PNU-159548 induced neutropenia/thrombocytopenia in animals and thrombocytopenia in patients, probably due to the higher sensitivity to the compound observed in human colony forming units-megakaryocyte (CFU-MK).

Indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHLs) are essentially incurable with current treatments. Rituximab is a specific anti-CD20 chimeric monoclonal antibody against the CD20 antigen, which is stably expressed on most B-cells (from the pre-B-cell stage). Compared with chemotherapy, rituximab has an excellent tolerability profile, making it a good therapeutic option for patients with indolent NHL. In the pivotal study for rituximab, patients with relapsed or refractory indolent or follicular lymphoma (FL) had an overall response rate of 50%. There is evidence that first-line rituximab therapy may be associated with better response rates; in previously untreated FL with a low tumor burden, rituximab monotherapy has produced an overall response rate of 73%. Attempts to improve response rates to rituximab by increasing the dose or frequency of dosing showed that the addition of four extra infusions of rituximab (in addition to the standard treatment schedule) resulted in an overall response rate of 76% in patients with FL. Augmenting rituximab with cytokines is also an option for increasing response rates in patients with indolent NHL. In a trial by the Nordic Lymphoma Study Group in patients with previously untreated or first-relapse indolent NHL, who had stable disease or a partial response after four doses of rituximab, 48% of the patients treated with rituximab plus interferon-alpha2a achieved a complete response. A further option is to combine rituximab with chemotherapy. Interim analyses from the East German Study Group have shown that rituximab plus mitoxantrone, chlorambucil and prednisolone (MCP) resulted in overall response rates of 89% in patients with untreated indolent lymphoma. Rituximab is therefore an excellent treatment option both as first-line and as salvage therapy for patients with indolent NHL.

INTRODUCTION. In classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), the low representation (~5%) of Hodgkin-Reed-Sternberg cells (HRS) challenged tumor genotyping on the tissue biopsy. Cell free DNA (cfDNA) is shed into the blood by tumor cells and can be used as source of tumor DNA for the identification of somatic mutations, track clonal evolution of tumors and detect minimal residual disease during therapy. AIMS. The study aimed at: i) showing that cfDNA mirrors the genetics of HRS cells in cHL patients; ii) characterizing the mutational profile of a large cohort of newly diagnosed and chemorefractory cHL; iii) identifying molecular prognostic subtypes; iv) early detecting residual disease during therapy; and v) longitudinally tracking tumor clonal evolution under different treatment modalities. METHODS. The study included 80 newly diagnosed cHL and 32 chemorefractory cHL. The following biological material was analyzed: i) cfDNA from plasma collected at diagnosis, during ABVD courses, at refractory progression, before and during therapy with brentuximab or nivolumab; and ii) normal germline genomic DNA (gDNA) from granulocytes. For comparative purposes, paired tumor gDNA from microdissected HRS cells of 13 cases was also analyzed. A targeted resequencing panel optimized to include the coding exons and splice sites of 77 genes recurrently mutated in B-cell lymphomas was used for genotyping. Ultra-deep next-generation sequencing (NGS) of the gene panel was performed on NexSeq 500 (Illumina) using the CAPP-seq library preparation strategy (NimbleGen). RESULTS. In cHL patients, cfDNA surrogated gDNA from HRS cells, since it harbored 87.5% of the tumor confirmed mutations. Genes recurrently affected by non-synonymous somatic mutations in >20% of cHL included STAT6 (37.5%), TNFAIP3 (35%), and ITPKB (27.5%) (Fig. 1A). Mutations clustered in major pathways, including NF-κB, PI3K-AKT, cytokine and NOTCH signaling, and immune evasion. ITPKB mutations: i) were quite specific for cHL, being rare or absent in other lymphomas; ii) caused the subcellular delocalization of the protein in primary HRS cells of mutated patients; iii) correlated with clues of PI3K-AKT signaling activation both at gene expression and protein levels; and iv) consistent with the positioning of ITPKB downstream PI3K in the pathway, associate with resistance to PI3K inhibitors. Mutations of CD58, encoding a co-stimulatory molecule for T-cells, associated with short PFS independent of interim PET/CT results, pointing to immune escape genetic lesions as biomarkers of aggressive disease (Fig. 1B). Newly diagnosed and chemorefractory cHL shared a largely overlapping mutational landscape. TP53 mutations were not enriched in refractory cHL as instead commonly found in other types of refractory B-cell tumors. Conversely, more TET2 mutations were documented in refractory cHL, including newly acquired mutation, thus signaling towards aberrant DNA methylation programming as a mechanism of resistance in cHL with potential therapeutic implications. By longitudinal analysis, in patients relapsing under/after chemotherapy or brentuximab vedotin, pre-treatment/relapse tumor pairs branched through the acquisition of phase specific mutations from an ancestral clone, that always persisted (Fig. 1C). Conversely, in patients maintained under nivolumab, clones were cyclically suppressed and replaced by completely novel clones. We utilized the change in circulating tumor cfDNA load from baseline to interim timepoint to predict the best response to ABVD and to complement interim PET/CT in anticipating cure. A drop of 100-fold or 2-log drop in tumor cfDNA after 2 ABVD courses associated with an eventual complete response and cure. All cured patients that were inconsistently judged as interim PET/CT positive turned out to have a >2 log drop in tumor cfDNA. A drop of less than 2-log in tumor cfDNA after 2 ABVD courses associated with an eventual progression. All relapsed patients that were inconsistently judged as interim PET/CT negative turned out to have a Download : Download high-res image (196KB) Download : Download full-size image Figure 1 . Disclosures Stathis: Celgene: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Other: Advisory board; Amgen: Honoraria. Bertoni: Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Cellestia: Research Funding; Menarini: Research Funding; Piqur: Research Funding; Immunogen: Research Funding. Santoro: Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zucca: Bayer: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Role; Jannsen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory role; Takeda: Consultancy, Other: Advisory role; Celltrion Healthcare: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Role; Celltrion Healthcare: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Role; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sandoz: Consultancy, Other: Advisory role; Bayer: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Role; Gilead Science: Consultancy, Other: Advisory role; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jannsen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory role; Roche: Advisory role, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Gilead Science: Consultancy, Other: Advisory role; Takeda: Consultancy, Other: Advisory role; Sandoz: Consultancy, Other: Advisory role. Gaidano: Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Carlo-Stella: ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding.

Lessons Learned Panitumumab shows activity in terms of disease control rate and preventing disease progression but not for tumor shrinkage in head and neck squamous cell cancer for second-line treatment. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) copy number gain, a property of tumor cells that theoretically could identify patients more likely to experience disease response, was common among patients having disease control. Our trial, given the lower toxicity with an every-2-week schedule, provides guidance for future trials, for example, in combinations of immune therapies and anti-EGFR-antibodies. Background The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of panitumumab (anti-epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR] antibody) given as a single agent in platinum-pretreated head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC). Methods Patients with advanced HNSCC previously treated with platinum-containing therapy were included. Panitumumab was administered intravenously every 2 weeks at a dose of 6 mg/kg. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1; secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. A Simon's two-step design was chosen; 4 partial remissions (PR) in the first 32 patients were required for continuing to step two. An exploratory biomarker analysis was performed. Results Thirty-three patients were enrolled. Two patients obtained a PR for an ORR of 6%, and 15 (45%) showed stable disease (SD) for at least 2 months, resulting in a 51% disease control rate. Median PFS was 2.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7–3.7), while median OS was 9.7 months (95% CI: 6.3–17.2). The most frequent adverse drug reactions were cutaneous rash (64%) and hypomagnesemia (55%). Overall, 30% of patients experienced grade 3/4 adverse events. No infusion-related reactions occurred. EGFR copy number gain (CNG) was more frequent in patients who benefitted from panitumumab. Two uncommon KRAS mutations (G48E, T50I) and 3 canonical PIK3CA mutations (all E545K) were detected. High-risk HPV16 was found in 10 patients and EGFR CNG in 13 treated patients. EGFR CNG seems to be more frequent in individuals with at least SD compared with patients with progressive disease (59% vs. 30%). PFS for patients with EGFR CNG was 4.6 months (95% CI: 1.0–9.2 months) and 1.9 months (95% CI: 1.0–3.2 months) for patients without CNG (p = .02). Conclusion Panitumumab monotherapy in pretreated HNSCC patients was well tolerated but moderately active. We observed a considerable disease control rate. Future strategies with this agent comprise right patient selection through the identification of reliable biomarkers and gene signatures predicting response and, considering good tolerability and convenience, combination strategies with novel agents and immune therapeutic agents.

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility and clinical effects of increasing doses of amifostine administered four times in 1 day with high-dose (HD) cyclophosphamide (CTX). Methods: A group of 16 patients with a diagnosis of lymphoma were treated with HD-CTX given at a total dose of 7 g/m2 subdivided into four doses, each preceded by increasing doses of amifostine. A group of 12 lymphoma patients previously treated with the same HD-CTX regimen was used as historical controls. Results: The dose of amifostine was escalated in cohorts of three patients each from 4×570 mg/m2 to 4×910 mg/m2 without severe toxic effects. Further patients were treated at the highest dose level. Side effects included a fall in blood pressure (always less than 20% of baseline value), asymptomatic hypocalcemia (from a median value of 2.4 to 1.7 mmol/l) and a decrease in creatinine clearance (from a median value of 102 to 85 ml/min). The parameters of hematotoxicity for patients treated in the study were not significantly different from those of the historical control patients. Conclusions: Amifostine can be given safely at a dose of 910 mg/m2 four times in 1 day in combination with HD-CTX. With this schedule amifostine did not show a myeloprotective effect.

Background: MCL is characterized by a dismal long term prognosis with a median overall survival of 3-5 years. Rituximab maintenance treatment (MR) improves survival of patients with follicular lymphoma, and its effect was assessed for MCL patients in several trials with inconsistent results. Other agents as bortezomib were also evaluated as maintenance therapy for MCL. Aims: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs in order to assess the effect of maintenance therapy on clinical outcomes of patients with MCL. Methods: We included RCTs that compared any type of maintenance to no maintenance or a different maintenance for patients with MCL, either in first line or relapsed disease. In July 2016 we searched The CochraneLibrary, MEDLINE, conference proceedings, and databases of ongoing trials. Two reviewers independently assessed the qualityof the trials and extracted data. The primary outcome wasall cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included progression free survival (PFS) and infectious adverse events. Relative risk (RR) for dichotomous data and hazard ratio (HR) for time to event datawere estimated and pooled using random-effects model. Results We identified 6 trials that reported relevant outcomes, conducted between the years 1998 to 2012 and randomizing 857 patients with MCL. Most patients were males, with a median age ranging from 57 to 70 years, and predominantly good performance status. Ninety-six percent of the patients received their first line of treatment. MIPI score was reported in three trials: 20 to 42 percent of patients had a high MIPI score. Induction therapy included rituximab in all trials. In five trials chemotherapy induction was applied and consisted of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide (FC) and mitoxantrone (Forstpointner, Blood 2006), cyclophosphamide, vincristine, adriamycin, prednisone (CHOP) or FC in one trial (Kluin-Nelemans et al.), bendamustine (Rummel et al.), DHAP followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) (Le Gouill et al.), and CHOP/cytarabine followed by ASCT (Doorduijn et al.); in one trial rituximab was given alone (Ghielmini et al.). Maintenance consisted of rituximab in five trials and bortezomib in one trial (Doorduijn et al.). The control group received no maintenance in two trials and interferon alfa in one trial. All included trials were judged at low risk of selection bias, none were blinded. No statistically significant effect on mortality rate was shown with rituximab maintenance therapy compared to no maintenance or interferon alfa RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.04, I2 of heterogeneity 57%, 751 patients. The RR of mortality with bortezomib maintenance was 0.67, 95% CI 0.12 to 3.71, but that is based on only 60 patients. PFS improved with rituximab maintenance compared to no maintenance or interferon alfa: HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.75. With bortezomib maintenance vs. no maintenance the HR of event free survival was 0.84, 95% CI 0.32 to 2.20. There was no statistically significant difference in infection rate with or without maintenance (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.69, 419 patients). Conclusions Maintenance therapy improved PFS of patients with MCL, but no survival benefit could be shown. The pooled analysis is based mainly on the results of rituximab maintenance as data of the effect of bortezomib maintenance is scarce. The absence of significant increase of infection rate as opposed to maintenance rituximab in follicular lymphoma might be attributed to the small sample size. Based on these results patients treated for both first line and relapsed/refractory MCL should receive rituximab maintenance after achieving response to induction. Table disease control (*progression free survival, **event free survival) of patients with MCL who responded to induction and treated with rituximab maintenance compared to observation or interferon alfa. Table. disease control (*progression free survival, **event free survival) of patients with MCL who responded to induction and treated with rituximab maintenance compared to observation or interferon alfa. Disclosures Dreyling: Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

The natural history of follicular lymphoma is usually characterized by an indolent course with a high response rate to the first line therapy followed by recurrent relapses, with a time to next treatment becoming shorter after each subsequent treatment line. More than 80% of patients have advanced stage disease at diagnosis. The time of initiation and the nature of the treatment is mainly conditioned by symptoms, tumor burden, lymphoma grading, co-morbidities and patients preference. A number of clinical and biological factors have been determined to be prognostic in this disease, but the majority of them could not show to be predictive of response to treatment, and therefore can’t be used to guide the treatment choice. CD20 expression is the only predictive factor recognized in the treatment of FL and justifies the use of “naked” or “conjugated” anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies as single agent or in combination with chemo- or targeted therapy. Nevertheless, as this marker is almost universally found in FL, it has little role for the choice of treatment. The outcome of patients with FL improved significantly in the last years, mainly due to the widespread use of rituximab, autologous and allogeneic transplantation in young and fit relapsed patients, the introduction of new drugs and the improvement in diagnostic accuracy and management of side effects. Agents as new monoclonal antibodies, immuno-modulating drugs and target therapy have recently been developed and approved for the relapsed setting, while studies to evaluate their role in first line treatment are still ongoing. Here we report our considerations on first line treatment approach and on the potential factors which could help in the choice of therapy.

The proportion of CD34+ cells in the bone marrow (BM) is predictive of the size of progenitor cell mobilisation into the blood (PB). To investigate which other PB and BM parameters may be related to mobilisation, we analysed at steady state PB and BM of 23 patients with relapsed or resistant lymphoma before administering high-dose cyclophosphamide and G-CSF Cell morphology, number of CD34+ cells, and growth in clonogenic assay and in long-term cultures (LTC) were determined and then correlated with mobilisation extent (CD34+ and GM-CFC) and quality (growth of harvested cells in LTC). We found that the good mobilising patients (CD34 > 50 x 10(3)/ml, n=10) had several baseline BM characteristics (number of CD34+ MNC, GM-CFC, BFU-E, production of CFCs in LTC) similar to a group of 12 healthy controls, while patients with reduced mobilisation (CD34 < 50 x 10(3)/ml, n=13) had clearly reduced BM progenitors and LTC growth (p< 0.05). In a multivariate analysis including baseline clinical, blood and bone marrow characteristics, the most significant PB and BM factors independently associated with a higher number and/or quality of mobilised cells were a higher number of CD34+ and GM-CFC in the BM and a higher baseline haemoglobin, platelet, and CD34+ blood count. The capacity to release progenitor cells into the circulation is therefore not predicted by the distribution of morphologically distinguishable cells, marginally predicted by the BM content of highly undifferentiated cells (growth in long term culture), while it is proportional to the number of BM progenitors (CD34+, GM-CFC and BFU-E).

Background: Clinical activity of the anti CD-20 monoclonal antibody Rituximab has been reported in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) and mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL). Patients and methods: 120 patients with bi-dimensionally measurable FL or MCL (R.E.A.L. Classification) were treated with Rituximab 375 mg/m 2 /week for 4 weeks. A central pathology review confirmed the diagnosis of FL in 76 of 78 and of MCL in 39 of 42 cases. The response was evaluated after 8 weeks and confirmed after 12 weeks from the start of treatment. Results: The toxicity of the treatment was, as expected, grade 1-2 fever and rigors during the first infusion and mild asthenia during the treatment period. Serious adverse events, probably or possibly related to the study treatment, included four deaths (3 of cardiac origin, 1 caused by P. carinii pneumonia) and 10 further nonfatal cases, including a permanent agranulocytosis and one case of heart failure. Response rate at week 12 was 52% for FL and 22% for MCL. After treatment, the BCL-2 rearrangement disappeared in 15 of 29 blood but only in 5 of 23 bone marrow samples; BCL-1 disappeared in 5 of 12 blood and 0 of 7 bone marrow specimens, as determined by PCR. Conclusions: Rituximab is an active agent for the treatment of FL, while its efficacy is modest in MCL. The effect in reducing minimal residual disease is more pronounced on the blood than it is on the bone marrow.

Background: The high-dose sequential (HDS) regimen developed in Milan for high-grade lymphomas is very active, but its toxicities are still partly unknown. We evaluated prospectively by doppler-echocardiograpy the cardiotoxicity of this treatment. Patients and methods: Over seven weeks, 20 patients received a sequence of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, etoposide, mitoxantrone and melphalan, each at its maximum tolerable dose, and the latter in conjunction with autologous peripheral stem-cell transplantation. Echocardiography was performed at baseline, before administration of mitoxantrone and 2, 6 and 12 months after transplantation. The following parameters of the left ventricular systolic and diastolic functions were determined: end diastolic (LVD) and end systolic (LVS) dimensions, the ejection fraction (EF), and the Doppler derived diastolic parameters: peak velocity of the early (E) and late (A) transmitral flow, the E: A ratio, deceleration time of the E wave (DT) and isovolumetric relaxation time (IVRT). A group of 20 normal volunteers served as control. Results: At baseline, in comparison to controls, the patients had altered diastolic function (diminished E: A ratio) and, although still within the normal range, a slightly reduced systolic function (EF). During treatment or in the course of follow-up none of the patients showed clinical signs or symptoms of cardiac failure, nor significant changes of systolic or diastolic parameters, apart from a transient increase in the E:A ratio after the first three chemotherapy cycles (from 1.14 to 1.37, P < 0.05). The EF remained constant during, and up to six months after, transplantation, decreasing only slightly after one year (from 62% to 59%, P < 0.05). Using analysis of covariance we showed that the major determinants of baseline cardiac function and of its evolution over time were patient age and gender, with previous treatment with anthracyclines having a minor role. Conclusions: The HDS chemotherapy regimen produced no significant sign of cardiotoxicity up to one year after transplantation in patients with normal baseline cardiac function and no history of cardiac disease, pretreated with up to 550 mg/m 2 of doxorubicin.