Search

The role of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) in testicular cancer is well established in both the primary and post-chemotherapy setting. The aim of this study was to report our 2 years oncological outcomes of robotic RPLND. A retrospective review was performed of all patients undergoing robotic RPLND by a single surgeon at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. Demographic, perioperative, and oncologic data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Between September 2014 and June 2020, 141 patients underwent an RPLND [33 (23.4%) were primary, 108 (76.6%) were post-chemotherapy]. 27 (19.1%) patients underwent a robotic bilateral template nerve-sparing RPLND. RPLND indication was primary (i.e. pre-chemotherapy) in 18 (66.7%), and post-chemotherapy in 9 (33.3%) patients. Stage at RPLND was 2A (n = 15, 55.6%), 2B (n = 9, 33.3%), 2C (n = 1, 3.7%) and 3 (n = 2, 7.4%). Median OR time (incision to closure) was 525 min and blood loss was 200 ml. Nerve sparing was performed in all but one case. Six (22.2%) adjuvant procedures were performed including two (7.4%) vascular repairs. Median length of stay was 2 days. Viable tumor was detected in 17 (63%) and teratoma in 9 (33.3%). Median follow-up was 31.3 months. No adjuvant chemotherapy was given. Three patients (11.1%) relapsed: 2 out-of-field and 1 with both in-field and out-of-field disease. Robotic RPLND can be performed safely. Long-term follow-up of series such as ours, enriched with patients with viable disease and/or teratoma, and not treated with adjuvant chemotherapy is required to ensure oncological outcomes are comparable to the open approach., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

We investigated the prognostic utility of pre-chemotherapy neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients with metastatic germ cell tumors (GCTs) undergoing first-line chemotherapy. We utilized two institutional databases to analyze the pretreatment-derived NLR (dNLR). Predictive accuracy was evaluated using the Cox proportional hazard model adjusted for the international germ cell cancer collaborative group (IGCCCG) risk classification. Discriminatory accuracy was evaluated by determining the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). In total, 569 of 690 patients had available dNLR (IGCCCG: good, 64%; intermediate, 21%; poor, 16%). The 5-year and 10-year overall survivals (OSs) for good, intermediate, and poor risk groups were 96.2%, 92.8%, and 62.7% and 93.9%, 90.3%, and 62.7%, respectively. A dNLR of 2 provided the best discriminatory accuracy with an AUROC of 0.58 (95% CI: 0.52-0.65, p = 0.01) for progression-free survival (PFS), whereas for OS, a dNLR of 3 provided the best discriminatory accuracy with an AUROC of 0.62 (95% CI: 0.53-0.70, p < 0.01). A dNLR > 2 was associated with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.99 (95% CI: 1.27-3.12, p < 0.01) for PFS, which lost its effect after adjustment for IGCCCG (HR: 1.44, 95% CI: 0.90-2.30, p = 0.13). For OS, a dNLR >3 was associated with an HR of 3.00 (95% CI: 1.79-5.01, p < 0.01), but lost its effect after adjustment for IGCCCG. Systemic inflammation plays a role in metastatic GCT, but its prognostic utility beyond established algorithms is limited. The general prognostic value of NLR can be seen across a number of tumors, although the consistency and magnitude of the effect differ according to cancer type, disease stage, and treatment received. We identified that an elevated NLR was associated with an adverse PFS and OS, but not independent of the IGCCCG risk classification. dNLRs >2 and >3 were associated with an adverse PFS and OS, respectively, in patients with metastatic GCT receiving first-line chemotherapy, but not independent of the IGCCCG risk classification.

The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) consensus conference on testicular cancer was held on 3-5 November 2016 in Paris, France. The conference included a multidisciplinary panel of 36 leading experts in the diagnosis and treatment of testicular cancer (34 panel members attended the conference; an additional two panel members [CB and K-PD] participated in all preparatory work and subsequent manuscript development). The aim of the conference was to develop detailed recommendations on topics relating to testicular cancer that are not covered in detail in the current ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) and where the available level of evidence is insufficient. The main topics identified for discussion related to: (1) diagnostic work-up and patient assessment; (2) stage I disease; (3) stage II-III disease; (4) post-chemotherapy surgery, salvage chemotherapy, salvage and desperation surgery and special topics; and (5) survivorship and follow-up schemes. The experts addressed questions relating to one of the five topics within five working groups. Relevant scientific literature was reviewed in advance. Recommendations were developed by the working groups and then presented to the entire panel. A consensus vote was obtained following whole-panel discussions, and the consensus recommendations were then further developed in post-meeting discussions in written form. This manuscript presents the results of the expert panel discussions, including the consensus recommendations and a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation. All participants approved the final manuscript.

Objectives: The first consensus report presented by the European Germ Cell Cancer Consensus Group (EGCCCG) in the year 2004 has found widespread approval by many colleagues throughout the world. In November 2006, the group met a second time under the auspices of the Department of Urology of the Amsterdam Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., Methods: Medical oncologists, urological surgeons, radiation oncologists as well as pathologists from several European countries reviewed and discussed the data that had emerged since the 2002 conference, and incorporated the new data into updated and revised guidelines. As for the first meeting, the methodology of evidence-based medicine (EBM) was applied. The results of the discussion were compiled by the writing committee. All participants have agreed to this final update., Results: The first part of the consensus paper describes the clinical presentation of the primary tumor, its treatment, the importance and treatment of testicular intraepithelial neoplasia (TIN), histological classification, staging and prognostic factors, and treatment of stage I seminoma and non-seminoma., Conclusions: Whereas the vast majority of the recommendations made in 2004 remain valid 3 yr later, refinements in the treatment of early- and advanced-stage testicular cancer have emerged from clinical trials. Despite technical improvements, expert clinical skills will continue to be one of the major determinants for the prognosis of patients with germ cell cancer. In addition, the particular needs of testicular cancer survivors have been acknowledged.

Objectives: The first consensus report that had been presented by the European Germ Cell Cancer Consensus Group (EGCCCG) in 2004 has found widespread approval by many colleagues throughout the world. In November 2006, the group met a second time under the auspices of the Department of Urology of the Amsterdam Medical Center, The Netherlands., Methods: Medical oncologists, urologic surgeons, radiation oncologists as well as pathologists from several European countries reviewed and discussed the data that had emerged since the 2002 conference and incorporated the new data into updated and revised guidelines. As for the first meeting the methodology of evidence-based medicine (EBM) was applied. The results of the discussion were compiled by the writing committee. All participants have agreed to this final update., Results: The second part of the consensus paper includes the treatment of metastasised disease, residual tumour resection, salvage therapy, follow-up, and late toxicities., Conclusions: Whereas the vast majority of the recommendations made in 2004 remain valid 3 yr later, refinements in the treatment of early-stage as well as of advanced-stage testicular cancer have emerged from clinical trials. Despite technical improvements, expert clinical skills will continue to be one of the major determinants for the prognosis of patients with germ cell cancer. In addition, the particular needs of testicular cancer survivors have been acknowledged.

Background: Testicular cancer is the most common malignancy in men aged 15-34, and its incidence has been increasing over the past half-century. Survival for stage I testis cancer approaches 100% regardless of management strategy which is often dictated by other factors such as perceived morbidity. Advances in treatment have attempted to decrease morbidity and surveillance is thought to achieve this goal., Methods: An English language literature search of MEDLINE from 1966 to December 2005 and CINAHL from 1982 to December 2005 was conducted using a broad search strategy. Comparative and descriptive original articles on outcomes of seminoma or NSGCT surveillance would be deemed eligible and review articles containing no original data were omitted. One hundred and thirty-eight articles were selected for formal review, during which a database was compiled that documented the first author, publication year, tumor histologic type, study purpose or topic(s), methodology, sample size, median follow-up, and relevant results., Results: Most evidence for the efficacy of surveillance is from descriptive series or non-experimental comparative studies. Relapse occurs in approximately 28% and 17% of surveillance patients in NSGCT and seminoma, respectively, and cause-specific survival is approximately 98% and 100%, respectively. Compliance with surveillance ranges from poor to adequate, however there is no evidence that compliance impacts clinical outcome. Cost analyses have yielded inconsistent results when comparing treatment modalities. There is scant literature on quality of life and psychosocial issues and results are inconsistent. Active surveillance appears to be appropriate and perhaps optimal first line management of clinical stage I seminoma and non-seminomatous germ cell tumors. Further quantitative and qualitative research is warranted to deepen understanding of these issues that may impact treatment decision-making.

Somatic mutations of the KIT gene have been reported in mast cell diseases and gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Recently, they have also been found in mediastinal and testicular germ cell tumours (TGCTs), particularly in cases with bilateral disease. We screened the KIT coding sequence (except exon 1) for germline mutations in 240 pedigrees with two or more cases of TGCT. No germline mutations were found. Exons 10, 11 and 17 of KIT were examined for somatic mutations in 123 TGCT from 93 multiple-case testicular cancer families. Five somatic mutations were identified; four were missense amino-acid substitutions in exon 17 and one was a 12 bp in-frame deletion in exon 11. Two of seven TGCT from cases with bilateral disease carried KIT mutations compared with three out of 116 unilateral cases (P=0.026). The results indicate that somatic KIT mutations are implicated in the development of a minority of familial as well as sporadic TGCT. They also lend support to the hypothesis that KIT mutations primarily take place during embryogenesis such that primordial germ cells with KIT mutations are distributed to both testes.

There continue to be several controversies surrounding the role for retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (RPL) in the management of patients with germ cell cancer of the testis. The initial treatment options for those with clinical stage I disease are surveillance (orchiectomy only), RPL or chemotherapy. Survival rates are similar with RPL and surveillance. Surgical morbidity has been reduced as techniques for RPL continue to improve. The likelihood of early or late (> 2 years) recurrence in the retroperitoneum is almost eliminated by RPL. Fewer follow-up computerized tomography scans of the abdomen are required and there are opportunities to reduce the duration and methods of follow-up, compared with surveillance. For patients with stage II disease, chemotherapy and RPL are equally effective initial treatment options but many patients require a combined approach. Initial RPL should be reserved for patients with smaller volume disease and possibly with lower preoperative marker levels. With RPL, patients are accurately staged and cured most of the time without double treatment. Approximately 30% of those with larger masses will have residual disease after initial chemotherapy and will require RPL as a second treatment. The third indication for RPL is to excise residual retroperitoneal masses following primary chemotherapy. Models to predict the presence of residual viable tumor, rather than necrosis only, at the time of surgery have been developed. If the orchiectomy specimen contained no teratoma, the tumor markers normalize after three or four courses of chemotherapy, and if the residual mass on computerized tomography scan is less than 2 cm in diameter, the rate of viable tumor may be low enough to omit RPL. In this way, the greater morbidity often associated with post-chemotherapy RPL may be avoided.

Purpose: This study was designed to determine the proportion of patients with clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors of the testis (NSGCTT) managed with surveillance after orchidectomy who have more advanced disease and, therefore, require further treatment, the time to progression, the sites of progression, and the efficacy of treatment delayed until progression was recognized., Patients and Methods: One hundred five patients were observed prospectively without further treatment after orchidectomy and full clinical staging. Treatment was given immediately upon detection of marker-positive, clinical, or radiologic evidence of disease., Results: Thirty-seven patients (35.2%) have required further therapy for disease progression, occurring from 2 to 21 months after diagnosis. Thirty-six patients have been successfully treated. Overall, 104 patients (99%) remain alive and free of disease at 12 to 121 months after orchidectomy. Progression occurred in the retroperitoneum in 25 of 37 patients who developed further disease on surveillance. The presence of vascular invasion in the primary tumor was predictive of an increased risk of progression., Conclusion: Surveillance is a valid alternative to immediate retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in patients with clinical stage I NSGCTT but should be recommended only under the close supervision of physicians experienced in the diagnosis and treatment of testicular cancer.

The complications arising from 100 consecutive retroperitoneal lymphadenectomies done for nonseminomatous germ-cell tumours of the testis were reviewed. Thirty procedures were performed with sparing of sympathetic nerve fibres. There were no operative deaths. Complications were not stage-related, and the sympathetic nerve-sparing procedure did not alter their frequency. Long-term follow-up in the same cancer centre allowed documentation of all early and delayed complications as a measure of burden of surgical therapy. Median follow-up for survivors was 44 months. Complications that resulted in delayed hospital discharge or further operative intervention at any time were defined as major; all others, resulting in minimal morbidity to the patient, were documented as minor. Injury to renal vessels occurred in four patients intraoperatively. Delayed complications included small-bowel obstruction requiring laparotomy (six patients), incisional hernia requiring repair (two patients) and urethral stricture requiring urethroplasty (one patient). There were 49 complications (14 major, 35 minor) in 35 patients. The authors conclude that the majority of complications after retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy are minor and cause little morbidity. This information is useful when comparing surgery to alternative therapy with similar outcomes. The overall burden of treatment becomes all-important in the selection of optimal therapy.

The principal morbidity of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy is the potential loss of ejaculation and, therefore, fertility owing to damage of the retroperitoneal sympathetic nerves that form the superior hypogastric plexus. We describe the results of our retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy when individual nerves from the sympathetic ganglia are identified and preserved while still performing a thorough bilateral retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. The nerve-sparing procedure was technically feasible in 20 of 30 consecutive patients and it was only impractical with extensive gross disease. Of the 20 patients 18 (90 per cent) ejaculate, including 8 with bulky (5 cm. or more) residual retroperitoneal disease who underwent a successful nerve-sparing operation. All 12 patients (100 per cent) with nonbulky disease ejaculate. With short followup, no retroperitoneal recurrences have been detected. This technique is an alternative to limited dissection designed to spare nerves using boundaries based on the patterns of metastatic involvement.