Back to Search Start Over

European consensus conference on diagnosis and treatment of germ cell cancer: a report of the second meeting of the European Germ Cell Cancer Consensus group (EGCCCG): part I.

Authors :
Krege S
Beyer J
Souchon R
Albers P
Albrecht W
Algaba F
Bamberg M
Bodrogi I
Bokemeyer C
Cavallin-Ståhl E
Classen J
Clemm C
Cohn-Cedermark G
Culine S
Daugaard G
De Mulder PH
De Santis M
de Wit M
de Wit R
Derigs HG
Dieckmann KP
Dieing A
Droz JP
Fenner M
Fizazi K
Flechon A
Fosså SD
del Muro XG
Gauler T
Geczi L
Gerl A
Germa-Lluch JR
Gillessen S
Hartmann JT
Hartmann M
Heidenreich A
Hoeltl W
Horwich A
Huddart R
Jewett M
Joffe J
Jones WG
Kisbenedek L
Klepp O
Kliesch S
Koehrmann KU
Kollmannsberger C
Kuczyk M
Laguna P
Galvis OL
Loy V
Mason MD
Mead GM
Mueller R
Nichols C
Nicolai N
Oliver T
Ondrus D
Oosterhof GO
Ares LP
Pizzocaro G
Pont J
Pottek T
Powles T
Rick O
Rosti G
Salvioni R
Scheiderbauer J
Schmelz HU
Schmidberger H
Schmoll HJ
Schrader M
Sedlmayer F
Skakkebaek NE
Sohaib A
Tjulandin S
Warde P
Weinknecht S
Weissbach L
Wittekind C
Winter E
Wood L
von der Maase H
Source :
European urology [Eur Urol] 2008 Mar; Vol. 53 (3), pp. 478-96. Date of Electronic Publication: 2007 Dec 26.
Publication Year :
2008

Abstract

Objectives: The first consensus report presented by the European Germ Cell Cancer Consensus Group (EGCCCG) in the year 2004 has found widespread approval by many colleagues throughout the world. In November 2006, the group met a second time under the auspices of the Department of Urology of the Amsterdam Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.<br />Methods: Medical oncologists, urological surgeons, radiation oncologists as well as pathologists from several European countries reviewed and discussed the data that had emerged since the 2002 conference, and incorporated the new data into updated and revised guidelines. As for the first meeting, the methodology of evidence-based medicine (EBM) was applied. The results of the discussion were compiled by the writing committee. All participants have agreed to this final update.<br />Results: The first part of the consensus paper describes the clinical presentation of the primary tumor, its treatment, the importance and treatment of testicular intraepithelial neoplasia (TIN), histological classification, staging and prognostic factors, and treatment of stage I seminoma and non-seminoma.<br />Conclusions: Whereas the vast majority of the recommendations made in 2004 remain valid 3 yr later, refinements in the treatment of early- and advanced-stage testicular cancer have emerged from clinical trials. Despite technical improvements, expert clinical skills will continue to be one of the major determinants for the prognosis of patients with germ cell cancer. In addition, the particular needs of testicular cancer survivors have been acknowledged.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0302-2838
Volume :
53
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
European urology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
18191324
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2007.12.024