Kathryn E. Carlson, Terry L. Sharp, Szeman Ruby Chan, M. Jeyakumar, Nicole Fettig, Michael J. Welch, Amy M. Fowler, John A. Katzenellenbogen, Dong Zhou, Robert D. Schreiber, and Carmen S. Dence
Estrogen receptor-α (ERα) is expressed in most human breast cancers and is an important predictive factor for directing therapy. Compared with patients with ERα-negative tumors, patients with ERα-positive (ERα+) tumors typically have longer overall survival and are more likely to respond to hormone-based therapies designed to decrease endogenous estrogens or block ER transcriptional activity, such as aromatase inhibitors, tamoxifen, or fulvestrant. However, some patients with ERα+ tumors do not respond to endocrine therapy (1). The progesterone receptor gene (PGR) is a classic estrogen-stimulated target gene, and currently both ERα and progesterone receptor (PR) are routinely measured using immunohistochemistry as part of the pathologic assessment of breast cancer (2). Although immunohistochemistry is the current gold standard for detecting steroid hormone receptor expression, noninvasive imaging offers several advantages. For instance, imaging can assess the entire lesion, which is advantageous for tumors with heterogeneous receptor expression that could lead to biopsy sample error. Furthermore, noninvasive imaging is useful for metastatic lesions that may be technically difficult to biopsy or for patients at high risk for biopsy-related complications. Repeated imaging can assess whole-body disease burden over time, as one cannot presume that recurrent or metastatic lesions retain the same steroid hormone expression profile as the primary tumor and discordance occurs in up to 30% of the patients who ultimately have a decreased response to hormonal therapy (3,4). The ability of these nuclear receptors to bind ligand provides a convenient target for the development of imaging agents (5). The estrogen-based radiopharmaceutical 18F-fluoroestradiol (18F-FES) has high specific activity, binding affinity, and selectivity for ERα over the ERβ subtype (6) and has been shown to exhibit high specific uptake by ER-rich target tissues and ERα+ mammary tumors using small-animal models (7,8). For human breast cancer patients, use of 18F-FES PET as a measure of tumoral ERα expression has been validated by the gold standards of immunohistologic and biochemical receptor assays with significant concordance (9–11). 18F-FES imaging has also been shown to be a predictive assay for endocrine therapy since patients with pretreatment 18F-FES standardized uptake values greater than 1.5–2.0 correlate with a positive response to therapy (12,13). Although not as well studied as 18F-FES, progestin-based radiopharmaceuticals such as 18F-fluoro furanyl norprogesterone (18F-FFNP) have been developed for PR imaging as an indicator of a functionally intact ERα signaling pathway (14). Preclinical studies have demonstrated high 18F-FFNP uptake in the uterus and ovaries of estrogen-primed immature female rats (14), and initial results for 18F-FFNP imaging of human breast cancer patients have recently been published (15). The goal of this study was to determine whether changes in tumoral steroid hormone receptor expression as assessed by molecular imaging after endocrine therapy are of predictive value using a preclinical animal model of human luminal breast cancer. Disruption of the gene for the signal transducer and activator of transcription-1 (STAT1) in mice results in a complete lack of responsiveness to interferons and, interestingly, spontaneous development of mammary tumors (16). These adenocarcinomas are remarkably similar to human luminal breast cancers since they express ERα and PR, require ovarian hormones for growth, and have significantly overlapping gene expression profiles (17). Furthermore, the tumors are HER2/neu-negative (17) and have no detectable epidermal growth factor receptor or ERβ protein expression (Szeman Ruby Chan and Robert D. Schreiber, unpublished data, May 29, 2012). In the current study, we performed 18F-FES and 18F-FFNP PET of primary and implanted STAT1-deficient (STAT1−/−) mammary tumors at baseline and in response to fulvestrant, a pure ERα antagonist, to determine whether changes in these imaging bio-markers can serve as an early predictive indicator of the ultimate response to therapy. An imaging approach that successfully predicts tumor response to standard endocrine therapy would be a useful tool for the further evaluation of novel breast cancer treatments.