Search

We hypothesized that uptitration of β blockade and adjustment of pacing parameters to achieve a prevalence of single chamber atrial inhibited rate-responsive (AAIR) pacing in patients with dual-chamber implantable cardioverter--defibrillators (ICDs) would result in maximization of β-blocker dosage and thus decrease appropriate ICD therapies. We included patients with ischemic or dilated cardiomyopathy and implanted ICDs without contraindications to β blockers and atrioventricular conduction disturbances. Two 6-month periods were compared: clinically guided phase (pacing function set at back-up dual-chamber rate-responsive pacing mode at a lower rate of about 40 beats/min) and pacing-guided phase, during which β-blocker dosage was titrated with a target of achieving90% AAIR pacing (lower rate 60 beats/min). Sixty-one patients (64.2 ± 8.3 years old) were included. During the pacing-guided phase the target of ≥90% AAIR pacing was achieved in 80.3% of patients. Mean metoprolol dose during the clinically guided phase was 96.7 ± 29.4 versus 127.0 ± 39.6 mg/day in the pacing-guided phase (p0.001). Appropriate ICD therapies were recorded in 35 patients (57.4%) during the clinically guided phase versus 20 (32.8%) during the pacing-guided phase (p0.001; 1.15 and 0.48 appropriate ICD therapies per patient, respectively, p0.001). In multivariate analysis, AAIR pacing and β-blocker dose were inversely related to appropriate ICD therapies. In conclusion, a pacing-guided approach for maximizing β-blocker doses guided by maximizing AAIR pacing in patients with ICDs may be beneficial compared to the conventional strategy. This pacing-guided approach led to higher daily β-blocker doses, which were correlated to fewer appropriate ICD therapies.

Objectives We sought to determine the potential of remote ischemic periconditioning (RIPC), and its combination with morphine, to reduce reperfusion injury in primary percutaneous coronary interventions. Background Remote ischemic post-conditioning is implemented by applying cycles of ischemia and reperfusion on a remote organ, which result in release of circulating factors inducing the effects of post-conditioning on the myocardium. Methods A total of 96 patients (59 men) were enrolled. The patients were randomized to groups as follows: 33 to each treatment group (Group A: RIPC; Group B: RIPC and morphine) and 30 to the control group (Group C). Measures of efficacy were achievement of full ST-segment resolution (primary), and reduction of ST-segment deviation score and peak troponin I during hospitalization. Results A higher proportion of patients in Groups A (73%) and B (82%) achieved full ST-segment resolution after percutaneous coronary intervention, compared with control patients (53%) (p = 0.045). Peak troponin I was lowest in Group B, 103.3 ± 13.3 ng/ml, in comparison to peak levels in Group A, 166.0 ± 28.0 ng/ml, and the control group, 255.5 ± 35.5 ng/ml (p = 0.0006). ST-segment deviation resolution was 87.3 ± 2.7% in Group B, compared with 69.9 ± 5.1% in Group A and 53.2 ± 6.4% in the control group (p = 0.00002). In paired comparisons between groups, Group B did better than the control group in terms of both ST-segment reduction (p = 0.0001) and peak troponin I (p = 0.004), whereas Group A differences from the control group did not achieve statistical significance (p = 0.054 and p = 0.062, respectively). Conclusions These findings demonstrate a cardioprotective effect of RIPC and morphine during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for the prevention of reperfusion injury. This is in agreement with observations that the beneficial effect of RIPC is inhibited by the opioid receptor blocker naloxone.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have been reported to inhibit in-stent restenosis. To assess the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on in-stent restenosis and its relation to apoptosis, 86 patients with chronic coronary artery disease who required stent implantation in the left anterior descending coronary artery or a major diagonal branch were studied. Patients were randomized to receive quinapril 40 mg/day orally (n = 43) or a placebo (n = 43). Drug therapy was initiated 1 week before initial stenting and continued for 6 months. Plasma levels of the apoptotic signaling molecules soluble Fas and soluble Fas ligand obtained from blood drawn from the left anterior descending coronary artery were measured just before initial stenting and 6 months later, at the time of repeat coronary angiography. In-stent restenosis was present in 9.3% of patients in the quinapril group and 25.6% of patients in the placebo group (p = 0.047). Mean late luminal loss was 0.56 +/- 0.51 mm in the quinapril group and 0.95 +/- 0.95 mm in the placebo group (p = 0.003). There were no significant differences in plasma soluble Fas or soluble Fas ligand levels at baseline. At 6 months, the change in plasma soluble Fas level was significantly higher in the quinapril group (0.72 +/- 1.24 ng/ml) than in the placebo group (0.28 +/- 0.72 ng/ml) (p = 0.024). The change in plasma soluble Fas ligand levels at 6 months was significantly higher in the quinapril group (7.43 +/- 12.2 pg/ml) than in the placebo group (0.06 +/- 6.8 pg/ml) (p = 0.002). In conclusion, the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor quinapril inhibits in-stent restenosis by stimulating apoptosis after percutaneous intervention.

As shown previously in patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) without symptoms or signs of heart failure, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP) increases rapidly, reaching a maximum within 24-36 h, and then decreases even if AF persists. A study was undertaken to use NTproBNP measurements in patients with AF of unknown time of onset to identify patients with presumed recent onset of the arrhythmia.Two-group open cross-sectional study.Hospitalised patients in cardiology departments of four hospitals.Patients presenting with AF of unknown onset and no signs or symptoms of heart failure were separated into two groups: group A with NTproBNP above the cut-off level and group B with a low NTproBNP level.No therapeutic intervention. All patients underwent transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE).Presence of left atrial thrombus on TEE.In group A (N=43) only two patients (4.7%) were found to have an atrial thrombus on TEE (negative predictive value of raised NTproBNP levels 95.3%) compared with 13 of 43 patients in group B (30.2%; p=0.002). Patients with a higher CHA(2)DS(2)VASc score (p=0.002) and a larger left atrium (p0.001) were more likely to have an atrial thrombus. In the multivariate analysis, NTproBNP below the cut-off level was the most powerful predictor of the presence of thrombus (OR 25.0; p=0.016).The reported strong correlation between raised NTproBNP levels and the absence of atrial thrombi on TEE suggests that the short-term increase in NTproBNP levels after AF onset might be used to assess the age of the arrhythmia and thus the safety of cardioversion in patients with AF of unknown onset and no heart failure.