Back to Search Start Over

Cardioprotective Role of Remote Ischemic Periconditioning in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Authors :
Ilias Rentoukas
Vlasios Pyrgakis
Spyridon Deftereos
Georgios Giannopoulos
Metaxia Driva
Vasiliki Panagopoulou
Andreas Kaoukis
Charalampos Kossyvakis
Sofia Vavetsi
Konstantinos Raisakis
Konstantinos Tsarouchas
Source :
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 3:49-55
Publication Year :
2010
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2010.

Abstract

Objectives We sought to determine the potential of remote ischemic periconditioning (RIPC), and its combination with morphine, to reduce reperfusion injury in primary percutaneous coronary interventions. Background Remote ischemic post-conditioning is implemented by applying cycles of ischemia and reperfusion on a remote organ, which result in release of circulating factors inducing the effects of post-conditioning on the myocardium. Methods A total of 96 patients (59 men) were enrolled. The patients were randomized to groups as follows: 33 to each treatment group (Group A: RIPC; Group B: RIPC and morphine) and 30 to the control group (Group C). Measures of efficacy were achievement of full ST-segment resolution (primary), and reduction of ST-segment deviation score and peak troponin I during hospitalization. Results A higher proportion of patients in Groups A (73%) and B (82%) achieved full ST-segment resolution after percutaneous coronary intervention, compared with control patients (53%) (p = 0.045). Peak troponin I was lowest in Group B, 103.3 ± 13.3 ng/ml, in comparison to peak levels in Group A, 166.0 ± 28.0 ng/ml, and the control group, 255.5 ± 35.5 ng/ml (p = 0.0006). ST-segment deviation resolution was 87.3 ± 2.7% in Group B, compared with 69.9 ± 5.1% in Group A and 53.2 ± 6.4% in the control group (p = 0.00002). In paired comparisons between groups, Group B did better than the control group in terms of both ST-segment reduction (p = 0.0001) and peak troponin I (p = 0.004), whereas Group A differences from the control group did not achieve statistical significance (p = 0.054 and p = 0.062, respectively). Conclusions These findings demonstrate a cardioprotective effect of RIPC and morphine during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for the prevention of reperfusion injury. This is in agreement with observations that the beneficial effect of RIPC is inhibited by the opioid receptor blocker naloxone.

Details

ISSN :
19368798
Volume :
3
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....f9e2f6b7475ccd2895622c3e4bc047b2
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2009.10.015