1. Surgical outcome of Mirizzi syndrome: Value of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic procedures
- Author
-
Chun-Nan Yeh, Shang-Yu Wang, Yin-Yi Chu, Jeng-Hwei Tseng, Chun-Yi Tsai, Yi-Yin Jan, Chi-Huan Wu, Keng-Hao Liu, Nai-Jen Liu, and Ta-Sen Yeh
- Subjects
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography ,Hepatology ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Mirizzi Syndrome ,medicine.disease ,Surgery ,Biliary disease ,Treatment Outcome ,Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic ,Laparotomy ,medicine ,Humans ,Referral center ,Laparoscopy ,In patient ,Risk factor ,business ,Laparoscopic cholecystectomy - Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with associated procedures and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) have been the standard treatments for both common and rare biliary diseases. Mirizzi syndrome (MS) is a rare and complex biliary condition. We report our experience with MS treatment and investigate the value of laparoscopic procedures and ERCP in patient management. METHODS From 2004 to 2017, 100 consecutive patients with MS were diagnosed by ERCP and underwent surgery in a referral center. Sixty patients were treated with intended LC, and 40 patients were treated with open cholecystectomy (OC). The clinical manifestations, ERCP and associated procedures, surgical procedures, and postoperative outcomes were investigated. RESULTS The surgical mortality rate was 1%, while the surgical morbidity rate was 15%. The patients treated with intended LC suffered from less morbidity (5%). The percentage of postoperative residual biliary stones was 32% (n = 32), and only three patients underwent re-operation (laparotomy) for stone removal. The laparotomy conversion rate in the intended LC group was 16.7% (10/60). The length of hospitalization for the patients with successful LC was significantly shorter than that for the patients with conversion and intended OC. Csendes classification was a risk factor for conversion from LC to OC (type I vs types II to V, P
- Published
- 2021