1. Use of non-contrast MR in diagnosing secondary lymphedema of the upper extremities
- Author
-
Anna Rose Johnson, Martin P. Smith, Ryoko Hamaguchi, Leo L. Tsai, Geunwon Kim, Kevin J. Donohoe, and Dhruv Singhal
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Secondary lymphedema ,Upper Extremity ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Breast cancer ,Positive predicative value ,mental disorders ,medicine ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Lymphedema ,Honeycombing ,Aged ,business.industry ,Lymphography ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,eye diseases ,chemistry ,Lymphedema clinic ,Thickening ,Radiology ,medicine.symptom ,business ,Indocyanine green ,Lymphoscintigraphy - Abstract
Purpose The purpose of the study is to determine if a combination of dermal thickening and subcutaneous fluid honeycombing on non-contrast MRI, termed the dermal rim sign (DRS), can be diagnostically analogous to dermal backflow seen on lymphoscintigraphy in patients with secondary upper extremity lymphedema. Materials and methods Upper extremity MRI and lymphoscintigraphy were performed on patients referred to a multidisciplinary lymphedema clinic for suspicion of secondary lymphedema. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of DRS on MRI in detecting dermal backflow on lymphoscintigraphy and the correlation between DRS, Indocyanine Green (ICG) lymphography, bioimpedence L-Dex® ratio and MRI Lymphedema Staging were calculated. Weighted interobserver agreements on the presence and location of DRS on MRI were calculated. Results Of the 45 patients in the study, 91.1% (41/45) of patients had history of breast cancer. The average age was 58.4 ± 10.5 years, with a mean symptom duration of 4.7 ± 4.4 years. The mean BMI was 30.5 ± 7.0 kg/m2. Interobserver agreement on the presence and the extent of DRS on MRI was 0.93 [95% confidence-interval: 0.80–1]. DRS was present in 97% (32/33) of patients who demonstrated dermal backflow on lymphoscintigraphy. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of DRS were 96.6% [81.7%–99.9%], and 75.0% [47.6%–92.7%], 87.5% [74.9%–94.3%], and 92.3% [63.1%–98.8%]. DRS was associated with severity on ICG lymphography and bioimpedance (both p Conclusions DRS on non-contrast MRI is highly predictive of dermal backflow and correlates with clinical measures of lymphedema severity. DRS may be used as an independent diagnostic biomarker to identify patients who would benefit from dedicated exams.
- Published
- 2021