Back to Search Start Over

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Dysphagia

Authors :
Evelyn M Garcia
Kevin J. Chang
Courtney C. Moreno
Drew L. Lambert
Christopher D. Scheirey
Angela D. Levy
Brooks D. Cash
Kathryn J. Fowler
Daniele Marin
Avinash Kambadakone
Laura R. Carucci
David H Kim
Twyla B Bartel
Barry W. Feig
Christine M. Peterson
Expert Panel on Gastrointestinal Imaging
Martin P. Smith
Stefanie Weinstein
Source :
Journal of the American College of Radiology. 16:S104-S115
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2019.

Abstract

This review summarizes the relevant literature for the initial imaging of patients with symptoms of dysphagia. For patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia who have an underlying attributable cause, a modified barium swallow is usually appropriate for initial imaging but for those who have unexplained dysphagia a fluoroscopic biphasic esophagram is usually appropriate. Fluoroscopic biphasic esophagram is usually appropriate for initial imaging in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients who have retrosternal dysphagia. For postoperative patients with dysphagia, fluoroscopic single-contrast esophagram and CT neck and chest with intravenous (IV) contrast are usually appropriate for oropharyngeal or retrosternal dysphagia occurring in the early postoperative period where water-soluble contrast is usually preferred rather than barium sulfate. In the later postoperative period (greater than 1 month), CT neck and chest with IV contrast and fluoroscopic single-contrast esophagram are usually appropriate. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Details

ISSN :
15461440
Volume :
16
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of the American College of Radiology
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........cade009a94064a36f5ce78c96b710722