1. Effects of high flow nasal cannula on exercise endurance in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- Author
-
Hui-Ling Lin, Shaw-Lang Cheng, Yen-Huey Chen, Huang-Pin Wu, and Chung-Chi Huang
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Medicine (General) ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Hemodynamics ,medicine.disease_cause ,Incremental exercise ,Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,R5-920 ,Internal medicine ,Oxygen therapy ,medicine ,Cannula ,Humans ,Exercise ,COPD ,business.industry ,Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ,General Medicine ,Stroke volume ,medicine.disease ,High flow nasal cannula ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Breathing ,Cardiology ,030211 gastroenterology & hepatology ,business ,Nasal cannula ,Bioelectrical impedance analysis - Abstract
Background: Ventilation limitation has a significant adverse effects on cardiovascular function and tissue oxygenation during exercise in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) improve ventilation by washing out the anatomical dead space and providing oxygen at constant concentration. This study aimed to examine the effects of HFNC on the exercise performance and hemodynamic status in COPD patients. Methods: Fifteen patients with COPD performed two constant load exercise tests (CLET) at the 70% of maximum workload achieved at a previous incremental exercise test on arm ergometer. The CLET were performed with HFNC and with nasal cannula (NC) in random order. The hemodynamics parameters of subjects during exercises were measured by a bioelectrical impedance device. The tissue oxygenation status (oxygenated hemoglobin, deoxygenated hemoglobin (hHb), total hemoglobin) was measured by a near infrared spectrophotometer. Results: The exercise duration was longer for HFNC test than NC test (962.9 ± 281.7 s, vs 823.9 ± 184.9 s, p < 0.05). At the end of CLET, the PetCO2 was lower for HFNC than NC (29.3 ± 5.1 mmHg vs 32.1 ± 5.5 mmHg, p 0.05), stroke volume (NC:73.5 ± 21.0 vs HFNC 67.5 ± 16.3 ml, p > 0.05). The changes of hHb in muscle tissues was significantly lower in HFNC test than that in NC test (p
- Published
- 2022