Back to Search Start Over

Comparisons of Outcomes between Patients with Direct and Indirect Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Authors :
Chi-Hsien Huang
Hsin-Hsien Li
Han-Chung Hu
Shaw-Woei Leu
Ko-Wei Chang
Li-Chung Chiu
Kuo-Chin Kao
Huang-Pin Wu
Tzu-Hsuan Chiu
Shih-Wei Lin
Feng-Chun Tsai
Li-Pang Chuang
Chung-Chi Huang
Source :
Membranes, Vol 11, Iss 644, p 644 (2021), Membranes, Volume 11, Issue 8
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
MDPI AG, 2021.

Abstract

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a heterogeneous syndrome caused by direct (local damage to lung parenchyma) or indirect lung injury (insults from extrapulmonary sites with acute systemic inflammatory response), the clinical and biological complexity can have a profound effect on clinical outcomes. We performed a retrospective analysis of 152 severe ARDS patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Our objective was to assess the differences in clinical characteristics and outcomes of direct and indirect ARDS patients receiving ECMO. Overall hospital mortality was 53.3%. A total of 118 patients were assigned to the direct ARDS group, and 34 patients were assigned to the indirect ARDS group. The 28-, 60-, and 90-day hospital mortality rates were significantly higher among indirect ARDS patients (all p &lt<br />0.05). Cox regression models demonstrated that among direct ARDS patients, diabetes mellitus, immunocompromised status, ARDS duration before ECMO, and SOFA score during the first 3 days of ECMO were independently associated with mortality. In indirect ARDS patients, SOFA score and dynamic compliance during the first 3 days of ECMO were independently associated with mortality. Our findings revealed that among patients receiving ECMO, direct and indirect subphenotypes of ARDS have distinct clinical outcomes and different predictors for mortality.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20770375
Volume :
11
Issue :
644
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Membranes
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....39f1216f74701e77699300778eed8db1