Search

PurposeWe aimed to assess the real-world efficacy of nab-paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer patients.Materials and MethodsThis is a retrospective study performed in two tertiary referral hospitals in Korea. Patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with nab-paclitaxel (Abraxane®) between March 2016 and March 2020 were enrolled.ResultsA total of 102 patients with metastatic breast cancer were included. Patients were heavily pre-treated with a median of four prior lines of chemotherapy (5 lines when including endocrine therapy in hormone-receptor-positive patients), and 66 patients (64.7%) were exposed to taxanes in the metastatic setting. According to St. Gallen molecular subtypes, 36 patients (35.3%) were luminal A, 28 (27.5%) were luminal B, 18 (17.7%) were human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive and 20 (19.6%) had triple-negative disease. Fifty patients (49.0%) were treated with a 3-weekly regimen (260 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks), and 52 (51.0%) were treated with a weekly regimen (100 mg/m2 every week). Objective response rate was 22.9%. After a median follow-up of 22.0 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.6 to 4.8) and median overall survival was 8.7 months (95% CI, 7.5 to 11.2). Patients treated with weekly regimen had longer PFS compared to 3-weekly regimen (5.5 vs. 2.3 months, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed the treatment regimen as an independent prognostic factor for PFS. There was no grade 3 or 4 hypersensitivity reaction.ConclusionThis real-world data shows that nab-paclitaxel is a reasonable treatment option in heavily pre-treated and/or taxane-exposed metastatic breast cancer patients.

Endocrine therapy (ET) remains the mainstay of treatment for steroid hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Tumor resistance to hormone therapy has led to the development of novel endocrine drug combinations, transforming the landscape of MBC management. The options for ET are expanding, with promising agents in the pipeline. Although MBC remains incurable, many patients can enjoy years of survival with good quality of life by cycling through the many available agents. With the plethora of available agents and rapid approvals, clinicians look to evidence-based guidelines to assist in treatment selection to maximize patient well-being. In this review, we provide a contemporary review of the advances in ET and a suggested algorithm to guide clinicians in daily management of patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative MBC. We will discuss landmark trials and highlight their impact in reshaping treatment approaches. Finally, we will provide a glimpse into advances on the horizon and the promise they bring to improve outcomes in patients with advanced breast cancer.

Oligometastatic breast cancer (OMBC) is a heterogeneous disease with intrinsic biological diversity. It is increasingly accepted in clinical practice that patients with OMBC could be treated with the expectation of long-term disease remission. Local ablative treatments, such as radiotherapy or surgery have a role in this setting. At present, patients that may benefit are characterised by low tumour burden, long disease-free interval and the capacity to completely ablate all sites of disease. In the future, biological or genomic classifiers may help predict which patients may benefit the most from local ablative treatments. This review provides an overview of the proposed classifications of oligometastatic disease and outlines the standard systemic treatment options of endocrine therapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy. The evidence for localized treatment with stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is presented. We discuss current active trials in oligometastatic cancer and discuss potential future directions for the use of SABR in the treatment of OMBC., Highlights • The oligometastatic disease state is being increasingly recognised in breast cancer. • Breast cancer is a heterogenous disease with varied subtypes and treatment paths. • Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy in addition to systemic therapy has merit. • Evidence suggests benefit for cure, stable disease maintenance, and symptom control. • Study of targeted strategies to treat oligometastatic breast cancer is encouraged.

Background The use of endocrine therapy for early-stage breast cancer, particularly aromatase inhibitor therapy has been associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis and fracture in clinical trials. We sought to validate this observation in real-world practice. Methods We used health administrative data collected from post-menopausal women (aged ≥66 years) who were diagnosed with breast cancer and started on adjuvant endocrine therapy from 2005 to 2012. Patients were classified by use of either an aromatase inhibitor or tamoxifen and followed until 2017 for a new diagnosis of an osteoporotic fracture. A multivariable analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model was adjusting for age, medical co-morbidities, medication use and duration of endocrine therapy. Results We identified 12,077 patients of whom 73% were treated with an aromatase inhibitor as compared to 27% with tamoxifen. Our multivariable analysis did not demonstrate any significant difference in the rate of osteoporotic fracture between patients treated with an aromatase inhibitor when compared with tamoxifen [Hazard ratio (HR) = 1.09; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.96–1.23, p-value = 0.18]. The 5-year rate of osteoporotic fracture for patients treated with either an aromatase inhibitor or tamoxifen was 7.5% and 6.9%, respectively. A completed sensitivity analysis did observe a decreased risk of fracture associated with tamoxifen usage over time. Conclusion We could not detect a significant difference in the rate of osteoporotic fracture among patients treated with an aromatase inhibitor versus tamoxifen. Nonetheless, the risk with tamoxifen was numerically lower and significantly decreased when accounting for total duration of endocrine therapy., Highlights • Our real-world study investigated the osteoporotic fracture risk among early-stage post-menopausal breast cancer patients. • No significant difference in fracture rates was observed among patients treated with aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen. • The risk of osteoporotic fracture decreased with tamoxifen usage over time. • Bone health should be carefully monitored and optimized among breast cancer patients recieving endocrine therapy.

This report examined the benefits and risks of palbociclib plus endocrine therapy (ET) in men with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Palbociclib was evaluated using three independent data sources: real-world data from pharmacy and medical claims, a de-identified real-world data source derived from electronic health records (EHRs), and a global safety database. From medical and pharmacy records, 1,139 men with MBC were identified; in the first-line setting, median duration of treatment was longer with palbociclib plus ET (n = 37, 8.5 months, 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.4-13.0) than ET alone (n = 214, 4.3 months, 95% CI, 3.0-5.7) and specifically, was longer with palbociclib plus letrozole (n = 26, 9.4 months, 95% CI, 4.4-14.0) than letrozole alone (n = 63, 3.0 months, 95% CI, 1.8-4.8). In the EHR-derived database, 59 men received treatment for MBC; real-world response across all lines of therapy in the metastatic setting was reported in 4 of 12 patients (33.3%) in the palbociclib plus ET group vs. 1 of 8 (12.5%) patients in the ET group. Review of the global safety database did not identify any new safety signals in palbociclib-treated men. Real-world data indicated that men with MBC benefit from palbociclib plus ET, with a safety profile consistent with previous observations in women with MBC. Collective data on palbociclib in women and men in this report, including clinical trial data, real-world data, and a well-established risk/benefit profile, led to US approval of an expansion of the palbociclib indication to include men with MBC.

Background Risk assessment on the molecular level is important in predictive pathology to determine the risk of metastatic disease for ERpos, HER2neg breast cancer. The gene expression test EndoPredict (EP) was trained and validated for prediction of a 10-year risk of distant recurrence to support therapy decisions regarding endocrine therapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy. The EP test provides the 12-gene Molecular Score (MS) and the EPclin-Score (EPclin), which combines the molecular score with tumor size and nodal status. In this project we investigated the correlation of 12-gene MS and EPclin scores with classical pathological markers. Methods EndoPredict-based gene expression profiling was performed prospectively in a total of 1652 patients between 2017 and 2020. We investigated tumor grading and Ki67 cut-offs of 20% for binary classification as well as 10% and 30% for three classes (low, intermediate, high), based on national and international guidelines. Results 410 (24.8%) of 1652 patients were classified as 12-gene MS low risk and 626 (37.9%) as EPclin low risk. We found significant positive associations between 12-gene MS and grading (p p = 0.001), 12-gene MS and Ki67 (p p 20% were classified as low risk by EPclin. Same differences were seen comparing EP test results and tumor grading. Conclusion In this study we could show that EP risk scores are distributed differentially among Ki67 expression groups, especially in Ki67 low and high tumors with a substantial proportion of patients with EPclin high risk results in Ki67 low tumors and vice versa. This suggests that classical pathological parameters and gene expression parameters are not interchangeable, but should be used in combination for risk assessment.

Dimple Butani,1 Nidhi Gupta,2 Gaurav Jyani,1 Pankaj Bahuguna,1 Rakesh Kapoor,3 Shankar Prinja1 1Department of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India; 2Department of Radiation Oncology, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India; 3Department of Radiation Oncology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, IndiaCorrespondence: Shankar PrinjaDepartment of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, IndiaTel +91 9872871978Email shankarprinja@gmail.comBackground: Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer among women in India. Treatment with hormone therapy reduces recurrence. We undertook this cost-effectiveness study to ascertain the treatment option offering the best value for money.Methods: The lifetime costs and health outcomes of using tamoxifen, AI and switch therapy were measured in a cohort of 50-year-old women with HR-positive early stage breast cancer. A Markov model of disease was developed using a societal perspective with a lifetime study horizon. Local, contralateral, and distant recurrence were modelled along with treatment related adverse effects. Primary data collected to obtain estimates of out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE) and utility weights. Both health system cost and OOPE were included. The future costs and consequences were discounted at 3%. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was used.Results: The lifetime cost of hormone therapy with tamoxifen, AI and switch therapy was to be ₹1,472,037 (I$ 68,947), ₹1,306,794 (I$ 61,208) and ₹1,281,811 (I$ 60,038). The QALYs lived per patient receiving tamoxifen, AI and switch were 13.12, 13.42 and 13.32. tamoxifen was found to be more expensive and less effective. As compared to switch therapy, AI for five years incurred an incremental cost of ₹259,792 (I$12,168) per QALY gained. At the willingness to pay equals to per capita GDP of India, there is 55% probability of AI therapy to be cost-effective compared to switch therapy.Conclusion: In postmenopausal women with HR-positive early-stage breast cancer, switch therapy is recommended for use on the basis of cost-effectiveness.Keywords: cost-effectiveness, aromatase inhibitor, tamoxifen, endocrine therapy, breast cancer

Purpose The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate outcomes of surgery compared to primary endocrine therapy (PET) in patients with non-advanced, operable invasive breast cancer, and to determine if PET as initial therapy may safely postpone surgery. Methods The MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library were searched from database inception to July 2020 to identify eligible studies. Inclusion criteria were experimental or observational studies with at least one arm treated with PET and a second arm treated with surgery with or without PET. Local recurrence or progression of disease was defined as either failure of non-operative management (tumor failing to decrease in size and/or continuous local or distant tumor growth) or relapse of breast tumor after tumor downsizing following PET. Effect estimates were expressed in hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals (HR (95% CI)). Results The analysis included six studies with 1499 unique patients. The median time to local progression of disease was 2.3 years. Patients treated with PET alone without surgery had a higher risk of local recurrence and or progression [HR (95% CI): 1.76 (1.33, 2.31); I2 = 84%; p

Background Surgical delays are associated with invasive cancer for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). During the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) was used as a bridge until postponed surgeries resumed. This study sought to determine the impact of NET on the rate of invasive cancer for patients with a diagnosis of DCIS who have a surgical delay compared with those not treated with NET. Methods Using the National Cancer Database, the study identified women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) DCIS. The presence of invasion on final pathology was evaluated after stratifying by receipt of NET and by intervals based on time from diagnosis to surgery (≤30, 31–60, 61–90, 91–120, or 121–365 days). Results Of 109,990 women identified with HR+ DCIS, 276 (0.3%) underwent NET. The mean duration of NET was 74.4 days. The overall unadjusted rate of invasive cancer was similar between those who received NET ((15.6%) and those who did not (12.3%) (p = 0.10). In the multivariable analysis, neither the use nor the duration of NET were independently associated with invasion, but the trend across time-to-surgery categories demonstrated a higher rate of upgrade to invasive cancer in the no-NET group (p < 0.001), but not in the NET group (p = 0.97). Conclusions This analysis of a pre-COVID cohort showed evidence for a protective effect of NET in HR+ DCIS against the development of invasive cancer as the preoperative delay increased, although an appropriately powered prospective trial is needed for a definitive answer. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-021-10883-5.

Background The benefit of adjuvant cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors with endocrine therapy (ET) in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor 2 receptor-negative (HR+/HER2-) early breast cancer (EBC) is uncertain. Hence, we performed a meta-analysis to determine the efficacy and safety of adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors plus ET and to identify potential preferred subpopulations for this regimen. Methods A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane databases up to Jan 15, 2021. Hazard ratios (HRs) for invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and risk ratios (RRs) for grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) and treatment discontinuation were extracted. Analysis with predefined subgroup variables was done. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed to assess the conclusiveness of survival outcomes. Results Three trials were eligible (N = 12647). Compared with ET, adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors with ET prolonged IDFS in patients with HR+/HER2- EBC (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.76–0.98, p = 0.03, I2 = 19%), with positive therapeutic responses observed in patients with N2/N3 nodal status (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.71–0.97, p = 0.02, I2 = 0%). None of the cumulative z-curves crossed the trial monitoring boundaries in TSA, and no reliable conclusion could be drawn. The combination treatment carried a higher risk of grade 3/4 AEs (RR 4.14, 95% CI 3.33–5.15, p, Highlights • Primary results from clinical trials investigating adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors were inconsistent. • The meta-analysis demonstrated potential IDFS benefit of adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors with endocrine therapy in HR+/HER2-early breast cancer patients. • A statistically significantly improved IDFS was observed in patients with N2/N3 nodal status. • Overall evidence favoring the use of adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors remained inadequate.

Hormone receptor testing mainly serves the purpose of guiding treatment choices for breast cancer patients. Patients with estrogen receptor (ER)‐positive breast cancers show significant response to endocrine therapy. However, the methods to define ER status and eligibility for treatment remain controversial. Despite recent guidelines considering staining ≥1% of tumor nuclei by immunohistology as ER‐positive, it has raised concerns on the benefit of endocrine therapy for tumors with ER 1%‐10% expression, termed “ER‐low positive”. This subgroup accounts for 3% to 9% of all patients and is likely to have unique molecular features, and therefore distinct therapeutic response to endocrine therapy compared with ER‐high positive tumors. The latest guidelines did not provide detailed descriptions for those patients, resulting in inconsistent treatment strategies. Consequently, we aimed to resolve this dilemma comprehensively. This review discusses molecular traits and recent ER‐low positive breast cancer innovations, highlighting molecular‐targeted treatment rather than traditional unified endocrine therapy for future basic and clinical research., This review discusses molecular traits and recent ER‐low positive breast cancer innovations, highlighting molecular‐targeted treatment rather than traditional unified endocrine therapy for future basic and clinical research.

Purpose To identify prognostic factors of invasive–disease free survival (iDFS) in women with non-metastatic hormone receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC) in daily routine practice. Methods We performed a retrospective study using data from the Côte d’Or breast and gynecological cancer registry in France. All women diagnosed with primary invasive non-metastatic HR + BC from 1998 to 2015 and treated by endocrine therapy (ET) were included. Women with bilateral tumors or who received ET for either metastasis or relapse were excluded. We performed adjusted survival analysis and Cox regression to identify prognostic factors of iDFS. Results A total of 3976 women were included. Age at diagnosis, ET class, SBR grade, treatment, stage and comorbidity were independently associated with iDFS. Women who had neither surgery nor radiotherapy had the highest risk of recurrence (HR = 3.75, 95%CI [2.65–5.32], p, Highlights • Treatment with AI was associated with a lower risk of recurrence. • Comorbidities are strong predictor of iDFS in breast cancer. • Radiotherapy after BCS was associated with a lower recurrence risk. • Age, comorbidity and histological type predict the choice of endocrine therapy.

Background The COVID-19 pandemic has required new treatment paradigms to limit exposures and optimize hospital resources, including the use of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NAET) as bridging therapy for HR+/HER2-invasive tumors and DCIS. While this approach has been used in locally advanced disease, it is unclear how it may affect outcomes in resectable HR+/HER2- tumors. Methods Women ≥18 years diagnosed with in situ (Tis) or non-metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer from March-May 2019 and 2020 were included. Fisher’s exact test and two-sample t test were used to compare baseline characteristics and surgical outcomes between strata. Sub-analysis was performed between patients who received primary surgery vs a bridging NAET approach. Results Despite similar clinical characteristics, patients in 2019 were more likely to have a surgery-first approach (75% vs 42%, P-value = .0007), receive surgery sooner (22 vs 29 days, P-value < .001), and within 60 days from diagnosis date (100% vs 85%, P-value = .0301). Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy was a more prevalent approach in 2020 (48% vs 7%, P-value < .0001). Rates of clinical to pathologic up-staging remained consistent across primary surgery vs bridging NAET subgroups ( P-value = .9253). Discussion Pandemic-driven treatment protocols provide a unique opportunity to assess the utility of bridging endocrine therapy for resectable HR+/HER2- tumors. Differences in clinical and pathologic staging were similar across groups and did not appear to be affected by receipt of NAET. Our limited cohort demonstrates this strategic therapeutic avenue can optimize health care utilization and may be a reasonable approach when delaying surgery is preferred.

AIMS To examine our hypothesis that a higher number of touching tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) detected in a setting such as an active surveillance clinical trial correlates with upgrading to high-grade DCIS (HG-DCIS) in the subsequent excisional biopsy. METHODS AND RESULTS The clinical inclusion criteria of the Comparison of Operative versus Monitoring and Endocrine Therapy (COMET) trial were applied to women who were mammographically screened between 2007 and 2017. In the core needle biopsy, touching TILs were assessed by counting the number of TILs touching the ductal basement membrane or away from it by one lymphocyte thickness. The highest number of TILs around a single involved duct and the average number among involved ducts were recorded. DCIS was graded as low or intermediate. Twenty-six of 129 (20.2%) cases had upgrading [14 (10.9%) to pure HG-DCIS, and 12 (9.3%) to invasive carcinoma, two of them with concurrent HG-DCIS]. An increased average number of touching TILs and intermediate-grade DCIS correlated with upgrading to HG-DCIS in 11 of 16 (68.8%) cases, and a decreased average number of touching TILs and low-grade DCIS correlated with no upgrading in 89 of 113 (78.8%) cases [accuracy of 0.775; area under the curve (AUC) of 0.746]. An increased highest number of touching TILs and intermediate-grade DCIS correlated with upgrading to HG-DCIS in 12 of 16 (75%) cases, and a decreased highest number of touching TILs and low-grade DCIS correlated with no upgrading in 82 of 113 (72.6%) cases (accuracy of 0.7287; AUC of 0.734). A highest number of touching TILs of ≥10 correlated with upgrading to invasive carcinoma and/or HG-DCIS (P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS Intermediate-grade and touching TILs may be good variables to examine in the COMET trial and to correlate with the risk of upgrading.

The luminal HER2-negative subtype is the dominant variant of metastatic breast cancer; modern combined endocrine therapy with CDK4/6 inhibitors due to significantly change the prognosis of the disease, not only for increasing progression free survival, but also for significantly prolonging the life expectancy of patients. This review presents the features of the mechanism of action of CDK4/6 inhibitors, the most significant and updated results of large, randomized trials with ribociclib (MONALEESA-2, MONALEESA-3, and MONALEESA-7) assessing the efficacy and safety of combined endocrine therapy with various endocrine partners in a population of premenopausal women and menopausal patients. The prospects for the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors for therapy patients with visceral crisis are shown.

Background Combination CDK4/6 inhibitor and endocrine therapy has been shown to significantly improve progression‐free survival (PFS) in patients with hormone receptor (HR)‐positive, HER2‐negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC). The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the real‐world benefit of first‐line combination therapy in this cohort and to correlate treatment efficacy with neutropenia, a common toxicity of CDK4/6 inhibitors. Methods This study included HR‐positive, HER2‐negative advanced or mBC patients who were treated with palbociclib plus endocrine therapy, mainly letrozole, between 1 January 2015 and 1 March 2018. Progression‐free survival (PFS) was determined using Kaplan–Meier analysis. The predictive value of absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for PFS were explored using Cox regression models. Both ANC and NLR were used as a time‐dependent variable. Results In total, 165 patients were included with median PFS of 24.19 months (95% CI 18.93–NR). Median PFS for patients with bone‐only metastases (n = 54) was not reached (95% CI 18.21–NR). Among patients with all other metastases (n = 111), median PFS was 24.19 months (95% CI 16.33–33.82). Lower ANC was correlated with decreased risk of progression (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.71–0.97, p = 0.008). There was no significant association between NLR and the risk of disease progression (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.97–1.18, p = 0.203). Conclusion The effectiveness of palbociclib and endocrine therapy in the treatment of HR‐positive, HER2‐negative mBC in the real‐world setting is similar to the efficacy reported in the PALOMA‐2 trial. Patients with lower neutrophil count may have a lower risk of early disease progression., The real‐world benefit of combination CDK4/6 inhibitor and endocrine therapy is similar to that reported in clinical trials. Treatment‐related neutropenia, assessed by absolute neutrophil count (ANC), may be correlated with lower risk of disease progression and a lower ANC threshold for dose reduction may be warranted.

A number of organizations are producing resource stratified guidelines (RSGs) for cancer. Despite using similar definitions of resource levels, systemic treatment recommendations often differ between organizations. We systematically searched for RSGs focusing on solid tumors. We qualitatively compared the methods used to generate guidelines using the AGREE-II appraisal tool. We extracted systemic treatment recommendations and assessed interguideline concordance using the Gwet AC1 coefficient, stratified by resource level, treatment setting and cancer type. We identified 69 RSGs cancer covering 15 solid tumors produced by four organizations. Despite using common resource-level definitions (Basic, Core/Limited, Enhanced and Maximal), recommendations differed between organizations. Concordance for chemotherapy recommendations was poor in Basic (58.3%, Gwet 0.20), fair in Core (58.3%, Gwet 0.32) and excellent in Enhanced (92.4%, Gwet 0.92) and Maximal settings (95.4%, Gwet 0.95). Concordance rates for endocrine therapy were good in Basic (80% Gwet 0.61), and excellent in Core (90%, Gwet 0.87), Enhanced (90%, Gwet 0.89) and Maximal settings (90%, Gwet 0.89). There was moderate to excellent concordance in targeted therapy recommendations across all resource levels. Differences in recommendations appeared driven by different opinions among the chosen panel of experts regarding what is resource appropriate. Overall, we found that countries looking to base treatment and health-policy on RSGs will find conflicting information depending on which guidelines are used, particularly for chemotherapy in Basic and Core settings. Improved transparency regarding the methods used to determine the value of a therapy for a given resource level is needed.

Background The sensitivity to endocrine therapy assay (SET2,3) predicts treatment outcomes in Stage II-III breast cancer. SET2,3 measures transcription related to estrogen and progesterone receptors (SETER/PR index) and the molecular subtype (RNA4: ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, AURKA) from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sections. Methods We designed a nested study across 3 pathology laboratories, each testing 60 breast cancers twice in controlled batches. Laboratories macrodissected and directly homogenized the unstained FFPE tumor sections, then performed the QuantiGene Plex bead-based hybridization assay. SET2,3 was calculated centrally using predefined statistical R-scripts and applying pre-defined cutpoints. Concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) was calculated from continuous measurements and Kappa statistic from categorical results. A mixed-effects model estimated contributions to bias (fixed effects) and variance (random effects) from the replicated design. Results Intralaboratory (CCC 0.96–0.99) and interlaboratory (CCC 0.98–0.99) SET2,3 results were concordant, with rates of agreement for high/low categorization within (Kappa 0.83–0.93) and between laboratories (Kappa 0.87–0.88). The relative contributions to overall variance of SET2,3 measurements were 96.90% from biological differences between cancers, 0.67% from interlaboratory variability, and 2.44% from residual causes including intralaboratory replicates. Similar results were obtained with SETER/PR, the baseline prognostic index calculated using pathological or clinical tumor and nodal staging information, and the 4 individual genes (ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, and AURKA). Conclusion Intra- and interpathology laboratory measurements of SET2,3 and its components were highly reproducible when tested from FFPE tumor sections.

To explore the efficacy and safety of palbociclib combined with endocrine therapy (ET) in advanced breast cancer (ABC). We conducted a retrospective study involving patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) ABC who received palbociclib combined with ET in the first- to third-line at three centers in China between January 2018 and October 2020. A total of 151 patients were included in this study. The median age of the patients at palbociclib initiation was 56 years (range 30-86 years) with a median follow-up of 10.9 months (range 2.0-41.2 months). Among these patients, 88 patients received palbociclib combined with ET as first-line therapy, and achieved a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 19.8 months and an objective response rate (ORR) of 40.9%, meanwhile, in the first-line setting, 62 patients received palbociclib at an initial dose of 125 mg, achieving a mPFS of 20.9 months and an ORR of 46.8%. There were 39 and 24 patients who received palbociclib combined with ET as second- and third-line therapy, the mPFS were 10.0 months and 6.1 months, respectively. The most common and serious adverse events (AEs) were leukopenia and neutropenia. A total of 64 patients (42.4%) underwent palbociclib dose reduction due to AEs. Palbociclib combined with ET is an effective therapeutic regimen for HR+/HER2- ABC, particularly in the first-line setting with palbociclib initial dose of 125 mg, and AEs were manageable.

Although there are some original articles related to the application of 18F-FES imaging in breast cancer patients, the heterogeneity of estrogen receptor (ER) based on 18F-FES uptake and its clinical significance are still vague. This review will mainly discuss heterogeneity of ER expression based on 18F-FES tracer and its clinical significance. A literature search on the PubMed and Web of Sciences, including relevant papers in the field of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging. We have collected the date from prospective or retrospective studies in which 18F-FES tracer was used to characterize ER status of lesions. Data from many articles have provided evidences for inter-patient and intra-patient heterogeneity of ER in breast cancer patients based on 18F-FES PET imaging, and it can be found that inconsistent FES uptake is influential in identifying endocrine therapy responder, evaluating treatment effect, and predicting prognosis in breast cancer patients. 18F-FES PET imaging is expected to non-invasively and comprehensively characterize inter-patient and intra-patient heterogeneity of ER, and reveal the correlation between this heterogeneity and clinical decision-making.

Background Adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) in patients with breast cancer (BC) increases the risk of becoming less physically active. Physical inactivity is associated with a higher risk of treatment-related side effects and mortality. This study investigated whether supervised exercise increased the proportion of patients adhering to the national physical activity (PA) guideline during adjuvant ET in overweight or obese BC patients. Methods This multicentre single-arm clinical trial included patients with BC participating in a 12-week supervised exercise intervention. An accelerometer measured moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA) at baseline (T0), after 12 (T1) and 26 weeks (T2). The primary endpoint was change in the proportion of patients with weekly ≥150 min of MVPA at T1 compared to T0. Secondary endpoints were adherence to PA guideline at T2, metabolic syndrome (MetS), body composition, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and BC-specific functioning and symptoms, self-reported PA, self-efficacy, exercise motivation and satisfaction with life. Results 141 patients with a median age of 61 years and a mean BMI of 31.3 participated. Adherence to the PA guideline increased from 38.3% at T0, to 40.4% at T1 (p = .112) and 44.7% at T2 (p = .003). MetS, body composition, HRQoL, BC-specific functioning and symptoms (i.e. fatigue, dyspnoea), self-reported PA, self-efficacy, exercise motivation and satisfaction with life improved significantly over time. Conclusions Supervised exercise increased the proportion of BC patients adhering to the PA guideline over time. Furthermore, MetS, body composition, HRQoL and symptoms improved. Our findings highlight the clinical relevance of supervised exercise during ET in overweight BC patients. Clinical trial information (NCT02424292)., Highlights • Overweight breast cancer patients on endocrine therapy can be motivated for supervised exercise. • Supervised exercise increases adherence to the physical activity guideline. • Metabolic syndrome and quality of life improved due to our intervention. • Participation in supervised exercise induces persistent clinical improvements.

Introduction OncotypeDX© Recurrence Score (RS) is a multigene panel used to aid therapeutic decision making in early-stage, estrogen receptor positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer. Aim To compare responses to neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) in patients with ER+/HER2-breast cancer following substratification by RS testing. Methods This systematic review was performed in accordance to the PRISMA guidelines. Studies evaluating pathological complete response (pCR), partial response (PR), and successful conversion to breast conservation surgery (BCS) rates following NET guided by RS were retrieved. Dichotomous outcomes were reported as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) following estimation by Mantel-Haenszel method. Results Eight prospective studies involving 691 patients were included. The mean age was 62.6 years (range 25–85) and the mean RS was 14.5 (range 0–68). Patients with RS 30 (OR: 1.27, 95% CI: 0.64–2.49, P = 0.490) respectively. Only 22 patients achieved pCR (2.8%) and RS group failed to predict pCR following NET (P = 0.850). Conclusion Estimations from this analysis indicate that those with low-intermediate RS on core biopsy are four times more likely to respond to NET than those with high-risk RS. Performing RS testing on diagnostic biopsy may be useful in guiding NET prescription., Highlights • Using the 21-gene assay (RS) on core biopsy is useful to guide neoadjuvant therapies. • Low-intermediate RS are four times as likely to respond to endocrine therapies. • Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) failed to increase breast conservation rates. • Following RS, NET is useful for treating early estrogen receptor positive cancers.

Purpose Breast cancer in the elderly has become a public health concern; there is a need to re-design its treatment with a view to de-escalation. Our paper sets out the rationale for a phase 3 randomized trial to evaluate less burdensome adjuvant procedures that remain effective and efficient. Materials and methods For low-risk breast cancer in the elderly, adjuvant treatment has been adjusted in order to make it more suitable and efficient. Hypofractionated radiation therapy based on accelerated or non-accelerated regimens as well as accelerated and ultra-accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) protocols were reviewed. Withdrawal of radiation (RT) or endocrine therapies (ET) from the adjuvant procedure were also investigated. Based on molecular and APBI classifications, inclusion criteria were discussed. Results Phase 3 randomized trials which compared standard vs. accelerated/non-accelerated hypofractionated regimens confirmed that the latter were non-inferior in terms of local control. Similarly, except for intraoperative-based techniques, APBI achieved non-inferior local control rates compared to whole breast irradiation for low-risk breast cancer. In phase 2 prospective trials using ultra APBI, encouraging results were observed regarding oncological outcome and toxicity profile. In phase 3 trials, adjuvant ET without RT significantly increased the rate of local relapse with no impact on overall survival while RT alone proved effective. Elderly patients aged 60 or more with low-risk, luminal A breast cancer were chosen as the target population in a phase 3 randomized trial comparing APBI + 5-year ET vs. uAPBI (16 Gy 1f) alone. Conclusion To investigate de-escalation adjuvant treatment for elderly breast cancer patients, we have defined a road map for testing more convenient strategies. This EPOPE phase 3 randomized trial is supported by the GEC-ESTRO breast cancer working group.

Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) is recommended after hormone receptor-positive breast cancer to reduce risk of recurrence, but adherence is sub-optimal in many women. Behavioral interventions have been ineffective in improving adherence rates to AET. This qualitative descriptive study investigates factors that support women in AET use and suggestions for interventions to improve AET use and management. Interviews with women who persisted with AET (n = 23), women who discontinued AET (n = 15), and healthcare providers (HCPs, oncologists, oncology residents, and pharmacists, n = 9) were conducted, transcribed, and described using thematic analysis. Data collection stopped once saturation occurred (i.e., no new codes or themes emerged during interviews). Two researchers created codes and developed themes in an iterative process, a third researcher verified the representativeness of final themes. This study was approved by the Health Research Ethics Board of Alberta (ID: HREBA.CC-17-0513). Women who persisted described being prepared for side effects and having self-management strategies, strong rationale for AET use, supportive HCPs, and available resources as relevant factors. Women who discontinued described feeling overwhelmed by side effects, information needs, drawbacks of AET, helpful/unhelpful experiences with HCPs, and contextual factors as relevant to their discontinuation. HCPs described health system-related and patient-related barriers, side effect management, and patient-provider interactions as relevant to supporting AET use. The considerable overlap in themes among the three groups suggests broad recognition of salient factors relevant to AET use and that associated strategies to improve use may be acceptable to patients and providers alike. Factors supporting AET use could include the following: education (which may be necessary but insufficient), developing a strong personal rationale for use, being prepared for side effects, having side effect management strategies, reciprocal communication between patients and HCPs, and accessible resources.

Multiparametric assays for risk stratification are widely used in the management of both node negative and node positive hormone receptor positive invasive breast cancer. Recent data from multiple sources suggests that different tests may provide different risk estimates at the individual patient level. The TEAM pathology study consists of 3284 postmenopausal ER+ve breast cancers treated with endocrine therapy Using genes comprising the following multi-parametric tests OncotypeDx®, Prosigna™ and MammaPrint® signatures were trained to recapitulate true assay results. Patients were then classified into risk groups and survival assessed. Whilst likelihood χ2 ratios suggested limited value for combining tests, Kaplan–Meier and LogRank tests within risk groups suggested combinations of tests provided statistically significant stratification of potential clinical value. Paradoxically whilst Prosigna-trained results stratified Oncotype-trained subgroups across low and intermediate risk categories, only intermediate risk Prosigna-trained cases were further stratified by Oncotype-trained results. Both Oncotype-trained and Prosigna-trained results further stratified MammaPrint-trained low risk cases, and MammaPrint-trained results also stratified Oncotype-trained low and intermediate risk groups but not Prosigna-trained results. Comparisons between existing multiparametric tests are challenging, and evidence on discordance between tests in risk stratification presents further dilemmas. Detailed analysis of the TEAM pathology study suggests a complex inter-relationship between test results in the same patient cohorts which requires careful evaluation regarding test utility. Further prognostic improvement appears both desirable and achievable.

Background Previous studies have suggested that metformin might improve survival outcomes in patients with breast cancer. However, findings on the efficacy of metformin with chemotherapy or endocrine therapy are inconsistent. Objective To clarify the efficacy of metformin with chemotherapy or endocrine therapy in breast cancer patients according to the treatment setting, including neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and metastasis/recurrence. Methods We systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and EMBASE from inception through July 2020. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and hypoglycemia rate were the primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included severe adverse events (SAEs) and relapse-free survival. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach and performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of metformin with chemotherapy and endocrine therapy in patients with breast cancer. Results Our systematic review included 412 participants from 5 trials. Metformin showed little to no difference in OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.13; 95% CI = 0.71-1.81; certainty of evidence [COE], moderate) and PFS (HR = 1.14; 95% CI = 0.86-1.50; COE, moderate) in patients with metastasis/recurrence. The evidence was very uncertain about the effect of metformin on survival outcomes in patients who received metformin with neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment. Metformin showed little to no difference in hypoglycemia and SAEs. Conclusion and Relevance Metformin should be discouraged routinely in nondiabetic patients with metastatic/recurrent breast cancer. Further RCTs are needed to verify whether metformin with chemotherapy or endocrine therapy results in significant clinical benefits in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting.

Objectives\ud \ud Approximately 20% of UK women aged 70+ with early breast cancer receive primary endocrine therapy (PET) instead of surgery. PET reduces surgical morbidity but with some survival decrement. To complement and utilize a treatment dependent prognostic model, we investigated the cost-effectiveness of surgery plus adjuvant therapies versus PET for women with varying health and fitness, identifying subgroups for which each treatment is cost-effective.\ud \ud \ud Methods\ud \ud Survival outcomes from a statistical model, and published data on recurrence, were combined with data from a large, multicenter, prospective cohort study of over 3400 UK women aged 70+ with early breast cancer and median 52-month follow-up, to populate a probabilistic economic model. This model evaluated the cost-effectiveness of surgery plus adjuvant therapies relative to PET for 24 illustrative subgroups: Age {70, 80, 90} × Nodal status {FALSE (F), TRUE (T)} × Comorbidity score {0, 1, 2, 3+}.\ud \ud \ud Results\ud \ud For a 70-year-old with no lymph node involvement and no comorbidities (70, F, 0), surgery plus adjuvant therapies was cheaper and more effective than PET. For other subgroups, surgery plus adjuvant therapies was more effective but more expensive. Surgery plus adjuvant therapies was not cost-effective for 4 of the 24 subgroups: (90, F, 2), (90, F, 3), (90, T, 2), (90, T, 3).\ud \ud \ud Conclusion\ud \ud From a UK perspective, surgery plus adjuvant therapies is clinically effective and cost-effective for most women aged 70+ with early breast cancer. Cost-effectiveness reduces with age and comorbidities, and for women over 90 with multiple comorbidities, there is little cost benefit and a negative impact on quality of life.

Background We evaluated patient‐reported outcomes (PRO) during neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plus external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) followed by either adjuvant continuous ADT (CADT) or intermittent ADT (IADT) for patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (Pca). Methods A multicenter, randomized phase III trial enrolled 303 patients with locally advanced Pca. The patients were treated with 6 months (M) of ADT followed by 72 Gy of EBRT, and were randomly assigned to CADT or IADT after 14 M. The PROs were evaluated at sic points: baseline, 6 M, 8 M, 14 M, 20 M, and 38 M using FACT‐P questionnaires and EPIC urinary, bowel, and sexual bother subscales. Results The FACT‐P total scores were significantly better (p, The quality of life was significantly favorable in intermittent androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) on FACT‐P total score, physical well‐being and functional score than those is continuous ADT in adjuvant hormone therapy for locally advanced prostate cancer.

Background The BYLieve trial (NCT03056755) confirmed efficacy and safety of alpelisib with fulvestrant for hormone receptor–positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor‐2–negative (HER2−), PIK3CA‐mutated advanced breast cancer (ABC), after cyclin‐dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) as immediate prior therapy. Further analyses were performed to compare efficacy from BYLieve with effectiveness of standard treatment in the real‐world setting. Materials and Methods Patients who progressed on a CDK4/6i plus AI and were treated with alpelisib with fulvestrant in BYLieve were matched with a real‐world patient cohort who received standard‐of‐care from a deidentified clinico‐genomics database (CGDB). Primary and secondary endpoints were to compare progression‐free survival (PFS), estimated by the Kaplan‐Meier method, and the proportion of patients remaining progression‐free at 6 months, respectively, between the two cohorts. Results A total of 855 patients with PIK3CA‐mutant disease who had prior CDK4/6i plus hormone therapy were selected from the CGDB; further matching to 120 patients from BYLieve selected 95 patients without exposure to HER2‐targeting agents, clinical study drug, or alpelisib. In unadjusted and postmatching results, primary and secondary endpoints favored treatment with alpelisib with fulvestrant in BYLieve more than standard treatments in the real‐world cohort. Postadjustment, median PFS for patients treated with alpelisib in BYLieve was 7.3 versus 3.7 months in the real‐world cohort, and 6‐month PFS was 54.6% versus 40.1%, respectively. Conclusion Matched/weighted analysis comparing BYLieve with the real‐world setting further supports the clinical benefit of alpelisib with fulvestrant for treatment of HR+, HER2−, PIK3CA‐mutant ABC after CDK4/6i treatment. Implications for Practice Approximately 40% of patients with hormone receptor–positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor‐2–negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC) have PIK3CA‐mutated tumors, which have been associated with endocrine therapy resistance. Alpelisib, an α‐selective phosphatidylinositol‐3‐kinase inhibitor, demonstrated significantly improved progression‐free survival in SOLAR‐1 and demonstrated clinical efficacy in BYLieve when combined with fulvestrant. Data are limited in comparing the efficacy of alpelisib combined with fulvestrant with effectiveness of standard therapy after CDK4/6i treatment. Using real‐world data, this is the first analysis comparing alpelisib combined with fulvestrant with standard treatments for HR+, HER2−, PIK3CA‐mutant ABC in the post‐CDK4/6i setting., This article reports the efficacy of treatment with alpelisib combined with fulvestrant in a cohort of patients with PIK3CA‐mutated breast cancer compared with the effectiveness of real‐world standard treatments in the post‐CDK4/6i setting using data from a deidentified clinico‐genomics database (CGDB).

PURPOSETo develop guideline recommendations concerning optimal neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer.METHODSASCO convened an Expert Panel to conduct a systematic review of the literature on neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer and provide recommended care options.RESULTSA total of 41 articles met eligibility criteria and form the evidentiary basis for the guideline recommendations.RECOMMENDATIONSPatients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy should be managed by a multidisciplinary care team. Appropriate candidates for neoadjuvant therapy include patients with inflammatory breast cancer and those in whom residual disease may prompt a change in therapy. Neoadjuvant therapy can also be used to reduce the extent of local therapy or reduce delays in initiating therapy. Although tumor histology, grade, stage, and estrogen, progesterone, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression should routinely be used to guide clinical decisions, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of other markers or genomic profiles. Patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who have clinically node-positive and/or at least T1c disease should be offered an anthracycline- and taxane-containing regimen; those with cT1a or cT1bN0 TNBC should not routinely be offered neoadjuvant therapy. Carboplatin may be offered to patients with TNBC to increase pathologic complete response. There is currently insufficient evidence to support adding immune checkpoint inhibitors to standard chemotherapy. In patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive (HR-positive), HER2-negative tumors, neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be used when a treatment decision can be made without surgical information. Among postmenopausal patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative disease, hormone therapy can be used to downstage disease. Patients with node-positive or high-risk node-negative, HER2-positive disease should be offered neoadjuvant therapy in combination with anti-HER2-positive therapy. Patients with T1aN0 and T1bN0, HER2-positive disease should not be routinely offered neoadjuvant therapy. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines .

We sought to determine the association between ‘trouble sleeping’, alcohol intake, hot flashes, and quality of life (QOL) in early-stage breast cancer survivors attending the Sydney Cancer Survivorship Clinic (SCSC). Survivors who had completed primary adjuvant treatment completed questionnaires assessing the following: symptoms, QOL (mean global score on FACT-G), and alcohol intake (drinks per day for past week), on the first visit to SCSC. Trouble sleeping and hot flashes were scored from 0 (no trouble at all) to 10 (worst I can imagine), with scores ≥ 4 classified as at least moderate and ≥ 7 severe. 238 breast cancer survivors attended SCSC from September 2013 to May 2019, with data available for 227 (median age 53 years; 70% on endocrine therapy). Trouble sleeping was at least moderate in 54% and severe in 19%. 47% reported consuming alcohol (mean 4.9 drinks/week). Scores for trouble sleeping were no different between survivors reporting alcohol consumption and not (mean 4.13 vs. 3.6; p = 0.17). Survivors reporting at least moderate trouble sleeping (vs. less than moderate) were no more likely to drink alcohol (OR 1.74, 95% CI 0.96–3.14, p = 0.067) but had poorer mean QOL scores (69.1 vs. 78.3; p = 0.0006). Survivors reporting at least moderate hot flashes (vs. less than moderate) were more likely to report at least moderate trouble sleeping (OR 3.78, 95% CI 2.02–6.71, p < 0.0001) and had worse mean QOL scores (68 vs. 78; p = 0.001). Trouble sleeping is common amongst breast cancer survivors and associated with hot flashes and poorer QOL, but not with self-reported alcohol consumption.

Endocrine therapy is widely used to treat cancers whose growth is dependent on hormonal stimulation, most commonly breast, prostate and endometrial cancers. The principles behind its use, indications, different medications available and some of the evidence to support its use are described. Endocrine therapies avoid the toxicities associated with chemotherapy, but do have recognized side effects that can impact on quality of life.

Radiotherapy is a critical tool for reducing locoregional recurrence, extending survival, and palliating symptoms in patients with breast cancer. With an ever-expanding armamentarium of systemic agents available, and an increasing trend toward the use of hypofractionated radiation regimens, it can be difficult to determine the safety of concurrent therapy. In particular, new targeted agents in both the adjuvant and metastatic setting have limited prospective or long-term data demonstrating safety when delivered concurrently with radiotherapy. Other systemic agents, including chemotherapy and endocrine therapy, are also important components of the overall treatment strategy for localized and metastatic breast cancer, and are often delivered concurrently with radiation in certain clinical scenarios. This review explores the safety, efficacy, and pitfalls of delivering radiation in conjunction with systemic therapies for breast cancer.

Purpose: Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are widely prescribed for postmenopausal women with breast cancer and are known to cause musculoskeletal pain. This study aimed to identify factors associated with AI continuation intention among breast cancer survivors (BCS). Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted on 123 BCS (stages I–III), who had been taking AIs for at least 6 weeks. Participants were recruited from a cancer center in Goyang, Korea, from September to November 2019. Descriptive statistics, Welch analysis of variance, Pearson correlation coefficients, and simple linear regression were used for the analysis.Results: Belief in endocrine therapy was a significant predictor of AI continuation intention (β=.66, p

Kathleen Beusterien,1 Martine C Maculaitis,2 Bernadette Hallissey,1 Michael M Gaschler,2 Mary Lou Smith,3 Ernest H Law4 1Kantar, Health Division, Horsham, PA, USA; 2Kantar, Health Division, New York, NY, USA; 3Research Advocacy Network, Plano, TX, USA; 4Pfizer Oncology, Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USACorrespondence: Ernest H LawGlobal Health Economics & Outcomes Research (Breast) Oncology, Patient & Health Impact, Pfizer Inc., 235 E 42nd Street (Office: 219/06/86), New York, NY, 10017, USATel +1 212 733-0785Email ernest.law@pfizer.comPurpose: Several adjuvant phase III trials are evaluating cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) in hormonal receptor positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) early-stage breast cancer (eBC). This study examines preferences for this combination regimen and ET alone among patients, oncologists, and payers in the United States.Methods: A web-based questionnaire, including a discrete choice experiment (DCE), was administered to patients, practicing oncologists, and payers. In the DCE, respondents selected between hypothetical treatment profiles with attributes associated with ET monotherapy and CDK4/6i + ET regimens. Each treatment alternative was defined by the following attributes: 5-year invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), nausea, diarrhea, neutropenia, alopecia, dosing schedule, and electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring. Payers had the additional attribute of annual per-patient treatment cost. Hierarchical Bayesian models were used to estimate relative preference weights for each attribute-level and relative attribute importance.Results: For patients (n=300) and oncologists (n=200), iDFS was most important (2 to 3 times more important than the next most important attribute), followed by neutropenia and diarrhea risks for patients and oncologists, respectively. Patients and oncologists required an improvement in iDFS of 8.0 and 5.6 percentage-points, respectively, to accept an increase in diarrhea risk from 11% to 81%. Payers (n=60) viewed annual per-patient cost as most important for treatment access decision-making, closely followed by iDFS. Payers required an improvement in iDFS of 21.8 percentage-points to accept an increase in cost from $5,100 to $149,400. Across all stakeholder groups, dosing schedule, alopecia risk, and ECG monitoring were perceived as least important.Conclusion: Patients, oncologists, and payers expect a large absolute risk reduction in efficacy to offset the potential risks and costs of adding a CDK4/6i to current standard of care. An open discussion between all stakeholders is necessary to ensure that decision-making, whether at patient- or system-level, is informed by preferences for novel treatments, like CDK4/6is.Keywords: cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors, endocrine therapy, treatment preferences, stage II/III breast cancer

Background Loss to follow-up (LTFU) during post-operative surveillance of breast cancer patients is detrimental. The pattern of LTFU and its risk factors in Chinese breast cancer patients remains unknown. Method Eligible non-metastatic breast cancer patients who underwent surgery at our institution between 2009 and 2012 were included. The clinicopathological features, as well as the LTFU status, were retrieved from the REDCap database. LTFU was defined as the absence of patients for at least 12 months since her last contact. 5-year LTFU was defined as the LTFU status of each patients at 5 years after surgery. The incidence and potential risk factors of LTFU were analyzed. A LTFU-risk score was developed to quantify the risk of LTFU. Results A total of 1536 patients with breast cancer were included, and 411(26.8%) patients were 5-year LTFU. 198 patients were LTFU in the first year. Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that age (younger and older), a lack of medical insurance, longer distance from residence to the hospital, pathology (DCIS/Paget’s/Phyllodes), lymph node metastasis, the absence of endocrine therapy and fewer than five contact numbers were significantly and independently associated with the risk of LTFU. A LTFU-risk score was developed and was predictive of LTFU. Conclusions A series of risk factors were significantly associated with post-operative LTFU of breast cancer patients. Patients with different risks of LTFU could possibly be identified, and surveillance plans could be individualized for different patients, so as to effectively reduce the overall LTFU rate, and optimize the allocation of medical resources., Highlights • The first research investigating loss to follow-up in patients with breast cancer in China, its patterns and risk factors. • A LTFU (loss to follow-up)-risk score which could be used to predict the risk of LTFUwas developed. • The LTFU-risk score stratified the risk of LTFU, assisting the development of individualized surveillance plans.

A 78-year-old man with metastatic prostate cancer was referred to the hospital 5 weeks after the initiation of systemic therapy with goserelin (GnRH agonist) because of a significant increase in alkaline phosphatase (ALP) concentration despite clinical improvement. Further workup revealed a decrease in prostate-specific antigen levels and a lack of radiological signs of disease progression. Subsequently, the ALP dropped spontaneously. This case report is an example for an early ALP flare after initiation of endocrine therapy in patients with bone metastasis which is consistent with a treatment response. Clinicians should be familiar with the ALP flare phenomenon in this setting, which does not reflect disease progression or treatment failure, in order to prevent unnecessary investigations, hospital admissions, or even erroneous termination of successful therapy.

Background: Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) is an approach that allows real-time evaluation of drug efficacy as well as investigation of the biological and molecular changes that occur after estrogenic deprivation. This evaluation is mainly performed in surgical specimens after NET and it has been used as a research tool to obtain prognostic and predictive information using tumour response to decide adjuvant treatment. In this setting, there are not many validated biomarkers to predict response beyond Ki67 expression and Preoperative Prognostic Index (PEPI score) in NET. The aim of this study is to determine if the tumour cellularity size (TCS) in surgical specimen after NET correlates with PEPI score and Ki67 expression. Methods: Retrospective study of postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor (ER) positive/HER2 negative resectable breast cancer, treated with an aromatase inhibitor for at least 4 months prior to surgery. Pathological characterization of tumour specimens: Evaluation of the percentage of residual tumour cellularity of formalin fixed paraffin embedded surgical specimens and immunohistochemistry characterization of ER and Ki67. Tumour cellularity size: calculated by combining the percentage of residual tumour cellularity and tumour pathological size. Results: N=104. Tumour characteristics at surgery and breakdown for the calculated PEPI score: table 1. Correlation between the percentage of Ki67 positive cells at surgery and TCS: (r=0.2503) p=0.04 (95% CI, 0.0014 to 0.4700). Correlation between TCS and PEPI score: (r=0.2582) p=0.05 (95% CI, -0.0131 to 0.4940). Conclusions: Tumour cellularity size is a promising biomarker to determine response and prognosis after NET. There is a need to find other biomarkers to predict response after NET. Table 1Pathology/Biomarker statusPEPI score RFS pointsNo. of patientspTNot available (NA)1pT1/T20102pT3/T431pNNA7Negative075Positive322KI67 levelNA10%-2.7%039>2.7%-7.3%131>7.3%-19.7%119>19.7%-53.1%213>53.1%31ER-status Allred scoreNA120-2303-8092PEPI scoreNA190281342533495561PEPI groupNot calculated19I (0 score)28II (1-3 score)42III (≥4 score)15 Citation Format: Joanna Ines Lopez Velazco, María Otaño, Lide Larburu, Ainhara Lahuerta, Kepa Elorriaga, Virginia Segur, Juan Carlos Irizabal, Ana Martínez, Lourdes Jáuregui, Maria M. Caffarel, Ander Urruticoechea. Tumour cellularity size as a biomarker to predict response after neoadjuvant endocrine therapy: Correlation analysis between Ki67 expression and PEPI score [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-39.

Background:Increased body mass index (BMI) and metabolic syndrome are associated with an increased risk of breast cancer recurrence. The mechanism(s) responsible for this increased risk are not known, though multiple mechanisms including resistance to endocrine therapy have been proposed. We sought to determine whether obesity and/or metabolic syndrome were associated with intrinsic tumor risk as determined by the Oncotype recurrence score (RS), or with resistance to neoadjuvant endocrine therapy, as determined by Ki67 response after short-term presurgical treatment. Methods:To investigate whether BMI was associated with increased intrinsic recurrence risk, we analyzed a cohort of 779 patients treated at Vanderbilt for early stage breast cancer and who had Oncotype test results. Medical records were reviewed to record BMI at the time of breast cancer diagnosis. We compared the Oncotype RS between patients with BMI greater or less than 27, and in normal, overweight, and obese ranges. To investigate whether the increase in breast cancer recurrence risk associated with obesity could be identified by a surrogate marker of short-term response to endocrine therapy, we analyzed data from a presurgical trial of endocrine therapy in early stage breast cancer patients previously completed at Vanderbilt. In this study patients were treated with 1-2 weeks of letrozole prior to surgery, then the surgical specimen was analyzed for Ki67. The original goal of the study was to compare endocrine sensitive tumors with endocrine resistant tumors as a platform for discovery of resistance mechanisms to endocrine therapy. We retrospectively analyzed medical records for 143 patients in that study who had post-treatment Ki67 values available, and for whom BMI at the time of surgery could be obtained. We also reviewed medical records for components of the metabolic syndrome (hypertension, hyperglycemia or anti-hyperglycemic medications, low HDL, high triglycerides or statin use, and BMI > 30 as a surrogate for waist circumference). Metabolic syndrome was defined as 3 or more of the 5 components. For endocrine therapy response, a cutoff of 1 for the natural log Ki67 expression was defined as sensitive (approximately 2.5%) and tumors with natural log of Ki67 expression between 1 and 2 (approximately 7.5%) were categorized as intermediate sensitivity. Results:We did not find any significant association between BMI and recurrence score and the distribution of risk scores was similar across all BMI groups. We did not observe any correlation between RS and BMI. However we did observe a difference in the proportion of endocrine sensitive and resistant tumors in overweight and obese groups (only a minority of patients in this cohort, 18%, had normal weight). In patients with overweight, 70% of the tumors had a post-treatment Ki67 level classified as sensitive, whereas only 40% of the tumors in patients with obesity were endocrine sensitive (chi square = 0.0518). Similarly, 72% of patients without metabolic syndrome had sensitive tumors, but only 51% of patients with metabolic syndrome had sensitive tumors (relative risk 1.408, chi square = 0.0154). Conclusions:Our findings suggest that the association between obesity and/or metabolic syndrome and increased recurrence risk is not reflected in tumor-intrinsic properties present at the time of diagnosis. Rather, the effect of obesity and metabolic syndrome appears to be in response to treatment, at least as measured by a short-term surrogate marker of long-term endocrine sensitivity. Importantly, this suggests that interventions to reverse obesity and/or metabolic syndrome may be effective in improving outcomes for breast cancer recurrence, at least in part by improving sensitivity to endocrine therapy. Citation Format: Riley Bergman, Yvonne Berko, Brent Rexer. Association of factors of the obesity phenotype with breast cancer recurrence risk measured by oncotype recurrence score and short-term response to neoadjuvant endocrine therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-18.

Background: Breast cancer (BC) accounts for 30% of female cancer, is the most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide and the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths among females. The majority (79%) of breast cancers express the estrogen receptor (ER+) and 91% of them are diagnosed at an early stage. But it is also known that late recurrence (5 years or more after diagnosis) represents about 50% of all recurrences of ER+ BC. Identify those patients who are at greatest risk for late recurrence and develop strategies to prevent it has emerged as a major unmet need in ER+ BC. In an attempt to reduce late recurrences, several studies have recently proposed that endocrine therapy (ET) prolonged beyond five years would achieve this goal. Conversely, extended ET increases the rates of side-effects, compared to conventional ET. Therefore, selecting patients who would really benefit from extended ET is crucial, as this would spare low-risk patients from potentially greater side effects and impacts in quality of life, restricting the treatment only for those who really could take advantage of this approach. That is why, currently, the subject late recurrence is being studied so much. CTS 5 (Clinical Treatment Score after 5 years) is a simple clinical-pathological tool developed to estimate the residual risk of distant recurrence after 5 years of ET. Objective: To assess the prognostic and predictive impact of CTS5 in overall survival (OS) of ER+BC patients treated with conventional or extended ET in a Brazilian Cancer Center. Study design and statistical analysis: A retrospective cohort study was conducted, selecting, through administrative databases of AC Camargo Cancer Center, 1085 ER+ BC patients with at least 5 years of adjuvant ET. Patients who missed follow-up before completing ET were excluded, but we kept those who presented any event related to illness or treatment. Statistical analysis includes a Kaplan-Meier analysis and the Log Rank test. Prognostic factors were assessed using univariate and multivariate Cox analysis. Results: The demographic and clinical characteristics of patients are described in table 1. In this cohort, continuous CTS5 was a significant predictor for OS (HR = 4,49 [3.12-6.46], p Conclusion: In this cohort, composed of real-life Brazilian women with ER+/ HER2- BC, irrespective of menopausal status, CTS5 proved to be an excellent predictor of OS. In addition, it was shown to be a predictor of response to extended ET. CTS5 score can identify a group of high-risk patients who benefits from extended ET. We consider that it would be of great value to expand the study population and follow-up, especially to analyze whether this tool also has a predictive value in contraindicating extended ET in low- risk and intermediate-risk patients. Table 1. Demographic and Clinical CharacteristicsCharacteristicNo. (%)Age, yearsMedian53IQR26-91< 50 years446 (41.1)>50 years639 (58.9)Tumor size, mm≤ 10285 (24.1)10-20458 (38.7)20-50378 (31.9)>5060 (5.1)GradeWell142 (11,9)Intermediate385 (32,5)Poor654 (55,2)Nodal status (No. of positive nodes)0756 (64.0)1 -3305 (25.8)≥4120 (10.2)ChemotherapyAdjuvant592 (50.1)Neoadjuvant118 (10.0)Endocrine TerapyET 5 years1060 (89,7)ET extendend100 (8.4)ET for less than 5 years.21 (1,8)CTS5Low587 (49.6)Intermediate344 (29.1)High250 (21.1)RecurrenceDistant147 (12,4)Local 39 (3,3) Citation Format: Lucas Vian, Ronaldo Souza, Vladmir Claudio Cordeiro de Lima, Daniella Yumi Tsuji Honda, Samara Theodoro Pacheco, Caio Dabbous de Liz, Luciana Beatriz Mendes Gomes, Bruno Cezar Mendonça Uchôa Júnior, Paula Tavares Guimarães, Celso Silva e Souza Filho, Andréa Paiva Guimarães, Maria Fernanda Evangelista Simões, Mauro Daniel Spina Donadio, Angelo Bezerra de Souza Fêde, Augusto Obuti Saito, Adriana Regina Gonçalves Ribeiro, Joyce Maria Lisboa Maia, Iara Karoline Freire Lustosa, Fabricio de Souza Castro, Monique Celeste Tavares, Marcelle Goldner Cesca, Marcelo Corassa, Noam Falbel Pondé, Solange Sanches. Cts5 tested in a Brazilian population: A tool that can predict global survival in early breast cancer ER+/HER2-, as well as the response to extended endocrine therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS6-25.

The Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) and Adherence Starts with Knowledge (ASK-12) questionnaire were originally developed and validated in Western populations to assess beliefs and barriers to medication adherence. The study aim is to validate the BMQ and ASK-12 questionnaire for use in a Singapore population with early stage breast cancer. English-speaking women on adjuvant endocrine therapy ( n = 157) were recruited. The BMQ-Specific showed good internal consistency with structural validity. The internal consistency of BMQ-General and ASK-12 Behaviour scale improved with the new factor structure obtained from exploratory factor analysis. Further studies are needed to confirm these factor structures.

Endocrine therapy is underutilized to reduce breast cancer incidence among women at increased risk. Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) assessing 77 breast cancer genetic susceptibility loci personalizes risk estimates. We examined effect of personalized PRS breast cancer risk prediction on intention to take and endocrine therapy uptake among women at increased risk. Eligible participants had a 10-year breast cancer risk ≥5% by Tyrer–Cuzick model [International Breast Cancer Intervention Study (IBIS)] or ≥3.0 % 5-year Gail Model risk with no breast cancer history or hereditary breast cancer syndrome. Breast cancer risk was estimated, endocrine therapy options were discussed, and endocrine therapy intent was assessed at baseline. After genotyping, PRS-updated breast cancer risk estimates, endocrine therapy options, and intent to take endocrine therapy were reassessed; endocrine therapy uptake was assessed during follow-up. From March 2016 to October 2017, 151 patients were enrolled [median (range) age, 56.1 (36.0–76.4 years)]. Median 10-year and lifetime IBIS risks were 7.9% and 25.3%. Inclusion of PRS increased lifetime IBIS breast cancer risk estimates for 81 patients (53.6%) and reduced risk for 70 (46.4%). Of participants with increased breast cancer risk by PRS, 39 (41.9%) had greater intent to take endocrine therapy; of those with decreased breast cancer risk by PRS, 28 (46.7%) had less intent to take endocrine therapy (P < 0.001). On multivariable regression, increased breast cancer risk by PRS was associated with greater intent to take endocrine therapy (P < 0.001). Endocrine therapy uptake was greater among participants with increased breast cancer risk by PRS (53.4%) than with decreased risk (20.9%; P < 0.001). PRS testing influenced intent to take and endocrine therapy uptake. Assessing PRS effect on endocrine therapy adherence is needed.Prevention Relevance: Counseling women at increased breast cancer risk using polygenic risk score (PRS) risk estimates can significantly impact preventive endocrine therapy uptake. Further development of PRS testing to personalize breast cancer risk assessments and endocrine therapy counselling may serve to potentially reduce the incidence of breast cancer in the future.

Endocrine therapy is the primary treatment for the most common types of breast cancer. Endocrine agents work by inhibiting the tumor-stimulating effects of estrogen in hormone-sensitive tumors. A new class of targeted drugs synergize with endocrine agents to improve survival for patients with metastatic disease. Endocrine therapy is continued for years, and long-term survival is common, although toxicities often occur due to the alteration of the physiologic effects of estrogen. It is important, therefore, that primary care providers remain knowledgeable about patient needs during and after treatment.

Athirah Saiful Bahri, Tuan Mazlelaa Tuan Mahmood, Siti Azdiah Abdul-Aziz, Mohd Makmor-Bakry, Noraida Mohamed Shah Centre of Quality Management of Medicines, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaCorrespondence: Noraida Mohamed ShahCentre of Quality Management of Medicines, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Raja Muda Abdul Aziz, Kuala Lumpur, 50300, MalaysiaTel +60 3 9289 8038Email noraida_mshah@ukm.edu.myContext: Globally, breast cancer is the most common cancer affecting women, and adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) is part of its treatment modality, which improves patients’ outcome. However, there are concerns on side effects related to its use, which may affect treatment adherence.Purpose: This study was conducted to explore attitude and practice on using AET among breast cancer patients in Malaysia.Patients and Methods: Postmenopausal breast cancer patients on at least 3 months of AET attending the outpatient oncology clinic at a tertiary care hospital were interviewed. Patients underwent in-depth interviews exploring their attitude and practices while on AET using a semi-structured interview guide. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis.Results: There were four main themes for attitude toward the use of AET: 1) benefits of using AET, 2) concerns on taking AET, 3) beliefs on alternative treatment, and 4) beliefs toward the doctor. For practice, six themes were obtained: 1) correct use of AET, 2) appointment adherence, 3) information-seeking behavior, 4) counseling services obtained, 5) experienced side effects of AET, and 6) usage of complementary and alternative medicines.Conclusion: Several themes concerning attitude and practice of breast cancer patients receiving AET were identified, which may be addressed during treatment consultations in clinical practice.Keywords: adjuvant endocrine therapy, breast cancer, interview, attitude, practice

Adjuvant endocrine therapy has transformed outcomes for patients with early-stage, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer; however, the optimal duration remains undefined. In a recent issue of The New England Journal of Medicine, Gnant et al. report the results of the ABCSG-16/SALSA trial that investigated the optimal duration of extended adjuvant aromatase inhibition and found that 5 years was not more beneficial than a 2-year extension. 1

Analysis of breast cancer prognostic and predictive factors is still nowadays poorly accurate and standardized. The advent of multi-gene expression profiles (MGEPs) has improved the prediction of breast cancer outcome, particularly regarding early luminal breast cancers (LBCs). The availability in our Institute of EndoPredict® (EP), a last-generation prognostic gene signature assay, has prompted us to study a series of LBCs, firstly verifying its reproducibility on six routine representative cases, either presenting non-optimal preanalytical conditions or different tumor samples from the same patient; secondly, correlating EP results on 8 retrospectively recruited samples with patients' follow-up; thirdly, applying prospectively EP on 100 routinely diagnosed cases, assessing the oncologists' and pathologists' attitude toward it. The complete reproducibility of EP on all the samples investigated in the first phase allowed to state that EP overcomes the detrimental effects of an inaccurate pre-analytic phase, determining the most appropriate prognostic and predictive parameters of breast cancer. The second phase confirmed EP as a fundamental tool in guiding therapeutic decision, improving the classical bio-pathological characterization and recovering 38% patients' inadequately managed. Finally, the study disclosed how oncologists sometimes inadequately requested EP, but also how it allows a better stratification of breast cancer otherwise considered poorly aggressive and not requiring an EP test, such as G1 neoplasms or tubular histotype. In conclusion, the introduction of EP test in an Anatomic Pathology Department emerges as a useful tool in routine breast cancer diagnosis, both for the characterization of individual cases and, as a result, for more appropriate therapeutic choices.

Purpose Abemaciclib in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) has demonstrated significant efficacy benefits in HR+ , HER2− advanced breast cancer patients in the Phase 3 studies MONARCH 2 (fulvestrant as ET) and MONARCH 3 (letrozole or anastrozole as ET). Here, we report age-specific safety and efficacy outcomes. Methods Exploratory analyses of MONARCH 2 and 3 were performed for 3 age groups ( Results Pooled safety data were available for 1152 patients. Clinically relevant diarrhea (Grade 2/3) was higher in older patients receiving abemaciclib + ET (p-value, 0.695; MONARCH 3: interaction p-value, 0.634). Estimated hazard ratios ranged from 0.523–0.633 (MONARCH 2) and 0.480–0.635 (MONARCH 3). Conclusions While higher rates of adverse events were reported in older patients, they were manageable with dose adjustments and concomitant medication. Importantly, a consistent efficacy benefit was observed across all age groups. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02107703 (first posted April 8, 2014) and NCT02246621 (first posted September 23, 2014).