1. Accuracy of the Ultra-Rapid Urease Test for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection
- Author
-
Pilar García-Iglesias, Carmen Loras-Alastruey, Luis Bujanda, Jesús Barrio, Julio Ducons, Miguel Montoro, Andrea Nevárez, Robin Rivera, José María Dedeu-Cuso, Felipe Bory-Ros, Yolanda Ber-Nieto, Reyes Aparcero, Montserrat Forné-Bardera, Belen Madrigal, Mireia Miquel-Planas, Julio Ponce, Eva Zapata, Isabel Mendez, Isabel Vera, Manuel J. Castro, Javier P. Gisbert, Alicia Bejerano, Adrian G. McNicholl, and Olga P Nyssen
- Subjects
Waiting time ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Helicobacter pylori infection ,Biopsy ,Rapid urease test ,Diagnostic accuracy ,Gastroenterology ,Helicobacter Infections ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,McNemar's test ,Internal medicine ,Positive predicative value ,Gastroscopy ,medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Prospective Studies ,Hepatology ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,Helicobacter pylori ,business.industry ,Reproducibility of Results ,Mean age ,Clinical Enzyme Tests ,Middle Aged ,Urease ,030211 gastroenterology & hepatology ,Female ,business - Abstract
Background Rapid Urease Test (RUT) is a simple, cheap and relatively fast method for diagnosing Helicobacter pylori infection. It is therefore the preferred method used for patients undergoing gastroscopy. Most kits require 24 h to give results. The new Ultra-Rapid Urease Test (URUT) kit by Biohit® requires less than 1 h. Objective To determine URUT's diagnostic accuracy. Method Prospective, blind, multi-centre study involving dyspeptic patients. One corpus biopsy and three antral biopsies were obtained during gastroscopy for standard histological analysis, RUT and URUT. The URUT result was checked after 1 min, 5 min, 30 min and 60 min and the RUT was checked over the course of 24 h. Histology was used as the gold standard test. Results 144 patients were included, 68% female, with a mean age of 49 years old; 50% were H. pylori positive. RUT and URUT diagnoses were correct in 85.9% and 90% of the cases, respectively. The mean waiting time for a positive RUT result was 6 h. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for RUT were, respectively, 82%, 90%, 89% and 84%. The URUT's results were similar (85%, 94%, 94% and 87%). These figures improved when patients taking PPIs were excluded (RUT: 86%, 91%, 93% and 83%; URUT: 91%, 94%, 96% and 89%). No statistically significant differences were found when comparing RUT and URUT distributions of correct diagnoses (McNemar's Test, p = 0.3) but there was a tendency towards better results with the URUT. Conclusion The URUT is equivalent to (or slightly better than) the traditional RUT in diagnosing H. pylori infection, and provides results in less than an hour.
- Published
- 2017