Search

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is an opportunistic infection that affects immunocompromised solid organ transplant patients. Defining the imbalance between host and virus factors that predispose to its occu...

Purpose of Review Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT). New strategies and methods for prevention and management of CMV infection are urgently needed. We aim to review the new developments in diagnostics, prevention, and management strategies of CMV infection in Allo-HSCT recipients. Recent Findings The approval of the novel anti-CMV drug letermovir in 2017 has led to an increase in the use of antiviral prophylaxis as a preferred approach for prevention in many centers. Real-world studies have shown efficacy similar to the clinical trial. CMV-specific T cell-mediated immunity assays identify patients with immune reconstitution and predict disease progression. Phase 2 trials of maribavir have shown its efficacy as preemptive therapy and treatment of resistant and refractory CMV infections. Adoptive T cell therapy is an emerging option for treatment of refractory and resistant CMV. Of the different CMV vaccine trials, PepVax has shown promising results in a phase 1 trial. Summary CMV cell-mediated immunity assays have potential to be used as an adjunctive test to develop individualized management plan by identifying the patients who develop immune reconstitution; however, further prospective interventional studies are needed. Maribavir and adoptive T cell therapy are promising new therapies for treatment of CMV infections. CMV vaccine trials for prevention are also under way.

Two transplant recipients (1 kidney and 1 hematopoietic stem cell) received maribavir (MBV) after cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection clinically resistant to standard therapy. Both patients achieved CMV DNA clearance within 30 and 18 days; however, the UL97 C480F variant emerged, causing recurrent CMV infection after a cumulative 2 months of MBV and 15 or 4 weeks of ganciclovir treatment, respectively. C480F was not detected under ganciclovir before MBV treatment. Recombinant phenotyping showed that C480F conferred the highest level of MBV resistance and ganciclovir cross-resistance, with impaired viral growth. Clinical follow-up and genotypic and phenotypic studies are essential for the assessment and optimization of patients with suspected MBV resistance.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) challenges physicians who care for immunocompromised transplant recipients. Antiviral drugs are the cornerstone in the prevention and treatment of CMV disease, but they have t...

This review focuses on recent advances in the field of cytomegalovirus (CMV). The 2 main strategies for CMV prevention are prophylaxis and preemptive therapy. Prophylaxis effectively prevents CMV infection after solid organ transplantation (SOT) but is associated with high rates of neutropenia and delayed-onset postprophylaxis disease. In contrast, preemptive therapy has the advantage of leading to lower rates of CMV disease and robust humoral and T-cell responses. It is widely used in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients but is infrequently utilized after SOT due to logistical considerations, though these may be overcome by novel methods to monitor CMV viremia using self-testing platforms. We review recent developments in CMV immune monitoring, vaccination, and monoclonal antibodies, all of which have the potential to become part of integrated strategies that rely on viral load monitoring and immune responses. We discuss novel therapeutic options for drug-resistant or refractory CMV infection, including maribavir, letermovir, and adoptive T-cell transfer. We also explore the role of donor factors in transmitting CMV after SOT. Finally, we propose a framework with which to approach CMV prevention in the foreseeable future.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) viraemia continues to be a frequent complication in the post-haemopoietic stem cell transplantation period despite a low incidence of CMV end-organ disease. Several significant advances in the understanding and management of CMV infection have occurred in the last few years including improved diagnostics, monitoring of CMV immunity, availability of novel anti-CMV drugs, and emerging use of immunotherapies including CMV-specific T-cell infusions. In addition to reviewing these advances we also explore some of the more practical prescribing issues of the older and newer CMV drugs including cost, toxicity and drug interactions to help clinicians navigate this new era of CMV management.

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplantation with lung transplant recipients being at highest risk. This article sumarizes recent findings in the pathophysiology of HCMV, especially its effects in lung transplant recipients; the current and new modalities for treatment and prevention of infection; and the latest guidelines for prevention and management of HCMV in lung transplant recipients. Recent findings include moves towards standardization for monitoring and treating HCMV and approval of a new agent, letermovir, for prevention of HCMV reactivation in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients now in clinical trials for solid organ transplant recipients, and updates on the late stage development of maribavir. The newest innovations include promising vaccine candidates as well as adoptive cell-mediated immunity through the use of virus-specific cytotoxic T cells. Finally, assays evaluating HCMV immune function to aid in the evaluation of individual patient’s ability to have a cell-mediated immune response to CMV are being developed. In the past 15 years major advances in diagnosis, prevention, management and risk evaluation in patients with HCMV have occurred, and research continues, which will impact outcomes in the transplant population.

Purpose of Review CMV DNA polymerase inhibitors such as ganciclovir and foscarnet have dramatically reduced the burden of CMV infection in the HCT recipient. However, their use is often limited by toxicities and resistance. Agents with novel mechanisms and favorable toxicity profiles are critically needed. We review recent developments in CMV antivirals and immune-based approaches to mitigating CMV infection. Recent Findings Letermovir, an inhibitor of the CMV terminase complex, was approved in 2017 for primary CMV prophylaxis in adult seropositive allogeneic HCT recipients. Maribavir, an inhibitor of the CMV UL97 kinase, is currently in two phase 3 treatment studies. Adoptive immunotherapy using third-party T cells has proven safe and effective in preliminary studies. Vaccine development continues, with several promising candidates currently under study. Summary No longer limited to DNA polymerase inhibitors, the prevention and treatment of CMV infections in the HCT recipient is a rapidly evolving field which should translate into improvements in CMV-related outcomes.

Purpose of review This review is an overview of recent advances in diagnostics, therapies, and prevention strategies for cytomegalovirus (CMV), focusing on solid-organ transplant and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Recent findings A randomized trial of prophylaxis vs preemptive therapy in donor-seropositive, recipient-seronegative liver transplant recipients found significantly less CMV disease in the preemptive group. Maribavir has shown promise for the treatment of resistant/refractory CMV and for uncomplicated CMV DNAemia. A post hoc mortality analysis, as well as emerging reports of real-world and off-label use, have expanded the spectrum of clinical experience with letermovir. The first interventional trials using CMV cell-mediated immune assays have been published and showed promising results for delineating antiviral strategies. New data from additional interventional trials are expected soon. Summary The past 1-2 years have seen major developments in the area of CMV management in transplant recipients. Expanding diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities provide a foundation for optimizing strategies in the future, to reduce morbidity and mortality from CMV.

Maribavir is a benzimidazole riboside with activity against cytomegalovirus (CMV). The safety and efficacy of maribavir for preemptive treatment of CMV infection in transplant recipients is not known.In a phase 2, open-label, maribavir dose-blinded trial, recipients of hematopoietic-cell or solid-organ transplants (≥18 years of age, with CMV reactivation [1000 to 100,000 DNA copies per milliliter]) were randomly assigned to receive maribavir at a dose of 400, 800, or 1200 mg twice daily or the standard dose of valganciclovir for no more than 12 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the percentage of patients with a response to treatment, defined as confirmed undetectable CMV DNA in plasma, within 3 weeks and 6 weeks after the start of treatment. The primary safety end point was the incidence of adverse events that occurred or worsened during treatment.Of the 161 patients who underwent randomization, 159 received treatment, and 156 had postbaseline data available - 117 in the maribavir group and 39 in the valganciclovir group. The percentage of patients with postbaseline data available who had a response to treatment within 3 weeks was 62% among those who received maribavir and 56% among those who received valganciclovir. Within 6 weeks, 79% and 67% of patients, respectively, had a response (risk ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.95 to 1.51). The percentages of patients with a response to treatment were similar among the maribavir dose groups. Two patients who had a response to treatment had a recurrence of CMV infection within 6 weeks after starting maribavir at a dose of 800 mg twice daily; T409M resistance mutations in CMV UL97 protein kinase developed in both patients. The incidence of serious adverse events that occurred or worsened during treatment was higher in the maribavir group than in the valganciclovir group (52 of 119 patients [44%] vs. 13 of 40 [32%]). A greater percentage of patients in the maribavir group discontinued the trial medication because of an adverse event (27 of 119 [23%] vs. 5 of 40 [12%]). A higher incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events was reported with maribavir, and a higher incidence of neutropenia was reported with valganciclovir.Maribavir at a dose of at least 400 mg twice daily had efficacy similar to that of valganciclovir for clearing CMV viremia among recipients of hematopoietic-cell or solid-organ transplants. A higher incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events - notably dysgeusia - and a lower incidence of neutropenia were found in the maribavir group. (Funded by ViroPharma/Shire Development; EudraCT number, 2010-024247-32.).

Maribavir is an investigational drug being evaluated in transplant recipients with cytomegalovirus infection. To understand potential drug‐drug interactions, we examined the effects of multiple doses of maribavir on cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 and P‐glycoprotein (P‐gp) activity using probe substrates in healthy volunteers. During this phase 1 open‐label study (NCT02775240), participants received the probe substrates digoxin (0.5 mg) and dextromethorphan (30 mg) before and after maribavir (400 mg twice daily for 8 days). Serial plasma samples were analyzed for digoxin, dextromethorpha, dextrorphan, and maribavir concentrations. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated (noncompartmental analysis) and analyzed with a linear mixed‐effects model for treatment comparison to estimate geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and 90% confidence intervals (CIs). CYP2D6 polymorphisms were genotyped using polymerase chain reaction. Overall, 17 of 18 participants (94.4%) completed the study. All participants were genotyped as CYP2D6 intermediate/extensive metabolizers. GMR (90%CI) of digoxin Cmax, AUClast, and AUC0‐∞ with and without maribavir was 1.257 (1.139‐1.387), 1.187 (1.088‐1.296), and 1.217 (1.110‐1.335), respectively, outside the “no‐effect” window (0.8‐1.25). GMR (90%CI) of dextromethorphan AUClast and AUClast ratio of dextromethorphan/dextrorphan were 0.877 (0.692‐1.112) and 0.901 (0.717‐1.133), respectively, marginally outside the no‐effect window, although large variability was observed in these pharmacokinetic parameters. Pharmacokinetic parameters of dextrorphan were unaffected. Maribavir inhibited P‐gp activity but did not affect CYP2D6 activity. Maribavir's effect on the pharmacokinetics of P‐gp substrates should be evaluated individually, and caution should be exercised with P‐gp substrates with narrow therapeutic windows.

The natural history of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in transplant patients has been well established. This virus may originate from the recipient, the donor or both. When pre-transplant IgG antibodies in the recipient are taken into account, three types of infection are possible: primary, reactivation or reinfection. The risks of high viral load and end-organ disease are highest after primary infection and lowest after reactivation. Serial monitoring of patients by quantitative polymerase chain reaction for CMV DNA allows antiviral drugs to be deployed for pre-emptive therapy or an antiviral drug may be given prophylactically. Both of these strategies are effective, but pre-emptive therapy has the advantage that randomised allocation of a new drug or placebo given prophylactically may show a reduced need for pre-emptive valganciclovir. In this review, I will consider what has been learned from use of ganciclovir and valganciclovir and apply this information to clinical trials that have evaluated maribavir, brincidofovir and letermovir. In addition, pre-emptive therapy has the advantage of facilitating the discovery of vaccines against CMV using a pharmacodynamic approach. Briefly, patients awaiting transplantation are given vaccine or placebo pre-transplant. When they proceed to transplantation, various parameters of viral load can be compared to determine if the vaccine has an effect against CMV when compared to patients randomised to receive placebo. If there is evidence of control of CMV, this can be related to immune responses induced by the vaccine to define a correlate of protection. This review will summarise the published evidence available.

A number of synthetic compounds, such as the nucleoside analog ganciclovir, its L-valine ester (a metabolic precursor of ganciclovir) and pyrophosphate analog foscarnet, are permitted for the treatment of HCMV-related diseases in the WHO European Region. The viral DNA- polymerase is used by all these drugs as a bio-target. However, the usage of standard anti-CMV therapy is accompanied by severe side effects, as well as the development of drug resistance in the virus, mainly in conditions of immunodeficiency. In this review, we focused on viral proteins of interest as new potential targets and their inhibitors, such as the inhibitor of human CMV terminology, lethermovir, which showed great activity in the third phase of clinical trials, inhibitors of viral cyclin-dependent kinase (maribavir, cyclopropavir ) and a number of compounds exhibiting anti-HCMV-activity, undergoing only preclinical trials in the experiment. Inclusion of new anti-CMV agents that are active against GСV/PFA/CDV-resistant strains of CMV into standard prophylactic and therapeutic regimens, will allow to increase the effectiveness of anti-CMV therapy, including in cases when standard therapy is ineffective. Areas covered: the international databases such as A MEDLINE, PubMed, eLIBRARY.RU, ClinicalTrials.gov., etc. with the purpose of obtaining information on compounds showing selective action against the human cytomegalovirus, the most promising for the development of drugs.

Answer: Disseminated varicella-zoster virus. The patient was prescribed oral valaciclovir when the lesions first appeared, and after 7 days of treatment, most of lesions resolved. PCR of swabs from the lesions was positive for varicella-zoster virus (VZV) DNA. Stains and culture for bacteria, fungi

Congenital cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection may cause significant fetal malformation, lifelong disease, and, in severe cases, fetal or neonatal death. Placental infection with HCMV is the major mechanism of mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) and fetal injury. Thus, any pharmaceutical antiviral interference to reduce viral load may reduce placental damage, MTCT, and fetal disease. However, there is currently no licensed HCMV antiviral for use during pregnancy. In this study, aciclovir and the HCMV-specific antivirals letermovir, maribavir, and cidofovir were compared with ganciclovir for antiviral effects in model systems of pregnancy, including first-trimester TEV-1 trophoblast cell cultures and third-trimester ex vivo placental explant histocultures. HCMV-infected trophoblasts at 7 days postinfection (dpi) showed an EC(50) of 21 μM for aciclovir, 0.0007 μM for letermovir, 0.11 μM for maribavir, and 0.29 μM for cidofovir, relative to 0.42 μM for ganciclovir. Antivirals added at 10 μM showed no cytotoxic effects and did not affect trophoblast cell proliferation (P > 0.9999). Multiple-round HCMV replication measured at 7 dpi showed letermovir, maribavir, and cidofovir treatment inhibited immediate early, early, and true late viral protein expression as assayed on Western blots. Antiviral treatment of HCMV-infected placental explants showed significant inhibition (P 0.9999). In ex vivo model systems, recently trialed HCMV antivirals letermovir and maribavir were effective at inhibiting HCMV replication. They partly fulfil requirements for use as safe and effective therapeutics during pregnancy to control congenital HCMV. Clinical trials of these newer agents would assist assessment of their utility in pregnancy.

International audience; Background: Congenital cytomegalovirus infection can lead to severe sequelae. When fetal infection is confirmed, we hypothesize that fetal treatment could improve the outcome. Maternal oral administration of an effective drug crossing the placenta could allow fetal treatment. Letermovir (LMV) and Maribavir (MBV) are new CMV antivirals, and potential candidates for fetal treatment.Methods: The objective was to investigate the placental transfer of LMV and MBV in the ex vivo method of the human perfused cotyledon. Term placentas were perfused, in an open-circuit model, with LMV or MBV at concentrations in the range of clinical peak plasma concentrations. Concentrations were measured using ultraperformance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. Mean fetal transfer rate (FTR) (fetal (FC) /maternal concentration), clearance index (CLI), accumulation index (AI) (retention of each drug in the cotyledon tissue) were measured. Mean FC were compared with half maximal effective concentrations of the drugs (EC50(LMV) and EC50(MBV)).Results: For LMV, the mean FC was (± standard deviation) 1.1 ± 0.2 mg/L, 1,000-fold above the EC50(LMV). Mean FTR, CLI and AI were 9 ± 1%, 35 ± 6% and 4 ± 2% respectively. For MBV, the mean FC was 1.4 ± 0.2 mg/L, 28-fold above the EC50(MBV). Mean FTR, CLI and AI were 10 ± 1%, 50 ± 7% and 2 ± 1% respectively.Conclusions: Drugs' concentrations in the fetal side should be in the range for in utero treatment of fetuses infected with CMV as the mean FC was superior to the EC50 for both molecules.

Serious viral infections usually occur within the first six months following allogeneic hematopoietic transplant (AlloHCT) [1]...

In this multicenter, dose-ranging study of maribavir for the treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections deemed refractory or resistant to current antivirals, 67% of patients achieved clearance of CMV viremia within 6 weeks, with responses maintained for up to 24 weeks., Background Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections that are refractory or resistant (RR) to available antivirals ([val]ganciclovir, foscarnet, cidofovir) are associated with higher mortality in transplant patients. Maribavir is active against RR CMV strains. Methods Hematopoietic-cell or solid-organ transplant recipients ≥12 years old with RR CMV infections and plasma CMV deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) ≥1000 copies/mL were randomized (1:1:1) to twice-daily dose-blinded maribavir 400, 800, or 1200 mg for up to 24 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with confirmed undetectable plasma CMV DNA within 6 weeks of treatment. Safety analyses included the frequency and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Results From July 2012 to December 2014, 120 patients were randomized and treated (40 per dose group): 80/120 (67%) patients achieved undetectable CMV DNA within 6 weeks of treatment (95% confidence interval, 57–75%), with rates of 70%, 63%, and 68%, respectively, for maribavir 400, 800, and 1200 mg twice daily. Recurrent on-treatment CMV infections occurred in 25 patients; 13 developed mutations conferring maribavir resistance. Maribavir was discontinued due to adverse events in 41/120 (34%) patients, and 17/41 discontinued due to CMV infections. During the study, 32 (27%) patients died, 4 due to CMV disease. Dysgeusia was the most common TEAE (78/120; 65%) and led to maribavir discontinuation in 1 patient. Absolute neutrophil counts

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) can cause severe disease in patients with compromised or immature immune systems. Currently approved pharmacotherapies for the treatment of systemic HCMV infections [ganciclovir (GCV), cidofovir (CDV), foscarnet] are limited by a high incidence of adverse effects and/or the development of drug resistance. Given that many of these drugs have the same viral target (HCMV-encoded DNA polymerase), cross-resistance is relatively common. The primary means to combat drug resistance is combination pharmacotherapy using therapeutics with different molecular mechanisms of action with the expectation that those combinations result in an additive or synergistic enhancement of effect; combinations that result in antagonism can, in many cases, be detrimental to the outcome of the patient. We therefore tested select combinations of approved (GCV, CDV, letermovir (LMV)) and experimental (brincidofovir (BCV), cyclopropavir (CPV), maribavir (MBV), BDCRB) drugs with the hypothesis that combinations of drugs with different and distinct molecular mechanisms of action will produce an additive and/or synergistic enhancement of antiviral effect against HCMV in vitro. Using MacSynergy II (a statistical package that measures enhancement or lessening of effect relative to zero/additive), select drug combination studies demonstrated combination indices ranging from 160 to 372 with 95% confidence intervals greater than zero indicating that these combinations elicit a synergistic enhancement of effect against HCMV in vitro. These data suggest that administration of a viral DNA polymerase inhibitor, MBV, and/or a viral terminase inhibitor in combination has the potential to address the resistance/cross-resistance problems associated with currently available therapeutics.

The human cytomegalovirus (CMV) UL97 kinase inhibitor maribavir is in Phase III clinical trials as antiviral therapy, including use for infections refractory or resistant to standard therapy. To assess its activity in combination with approved and experimental CMV antivirals, and with the mTor inhibitor rapamycin (sirolimus), drug effects were tested by in vitro checkerboard assays and the data were analyzed using a three dimensional model based on an independent effects definition of additive interactions. Baseline virus and representative drug-resistant mutants were tested. According to the volume of synergy at 95% confidence, maribavir showed additive interactions with foscarnet, cidofovir, letermovir and GW275175X when tested against wild type and mutant viruses, strong antagonism with ganciclovir, and strong synergy with rapamycin, the latter suggesting a potentially useful therapeutic combination.

Patients treated with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) are at risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation and disease, which results in increased morbidity and mortality. Although universal antiviral prophylaxis against CMV improves outcomes in solid organ transplant recipients, data have been conflicting regarding such prophylaxis in patients undergoing allogeneic HCT. We conducted a systematic review of randomized trials of prophylactic antivirals against CMV after allogeneic HCT to summarize the evolution of the field over the last 35 years and evaluate the prophylactic potential of antiviral agents against CMV after allogeneic HCT. Electronic databases were queried from database inception through 31 December 2017. For included studies, incidence of CMV infection and all-cause mortality were collected as primary outcomes; CMV disease incidence, use of preemptive therapy, and drug toxicities were collected as secondary outcomes. Nineteen clinical trials conducted between 1981 and 2017 involving a total of 4173 patients were included for review. Prophylactic strategies included use of acyclovir, valacyclovir, ganciclovir, maribavir, brincidofovir, and letermovir compared with placebo or a comparator antiviral. Fourteen trials that compared antiviral prophylaxis with placebo demonstrated overall effectiveness in reducing incidence of CMV infection (odds ratio [OR], 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42-0.58), CMV disease (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.40-0.80), and use of preemptive therapy (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.42-0.62; 6 trials); however, none demonstrated reduction in all-cause mortality (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.78-1.18) except the phase 3 trial of letermovir (week-24 OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.38-0.98). Additional research is warranted to determine patient groups most likely to benefit from antiviral prophylaxis and its optimal deployment after allogeneic HCT.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Transplant recipients are at risk for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and associated morbidity and mortality. We summarize recently introduced or currently investigated modalities for prevention and treatment of CMV infection in hematopoietic cell (HCT) and solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. RECENT FINDINGS: Letermovir was recently approved for CMV prevention in HCT recipients. Data from real world studies support its role to improve outcomes in this population. Letermovir is currently under investigation for broader patient populations and indications. Maribavir is in late stages of development for CMV treatment and may provide a safer alternative to currently available anti-CMV drugs. Promising CMV vaccine candidates and adoptive cell therapy approaches are under evaluation. CMV immune monitoring assays are predicted to play a more central role in our clinical decision making. SUMMARY: In recent years, major advances have been made in CMV prevention and treatment in transplant recipients. Rigorous research is ongoing and is anticipated to further impact our ability to improve outcomes in this population.

Herpesviruses thymidine kinase (TK) and protein kinase (PK) allow the activation of nucleoside analogues used in anti-herpesvirus treatments. Mutations emerging in these two genes often lead to emergence of drug-resistant strains responsible for life-threatening diseases in immunocompromised populations. In this review, we analyze the binding of different nucleoside analogues to the TK active site of the three α-herpesviruses [Herpes Simplex Virus 1 and 2 (HSV-1 and HSV-2) and Varicella-Zoster Virus (VZV)] and present the impact of known mutations on the structure of the viral TKs. Furthermore, models of β-herpesviruses [Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) and human herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6)] PKs allow to link amino acid changes with resistance to ganciclovir and/or maribavir, an investigational chemotherapeutic used in patients with multidrug-resistant HCMV. Finally, we set the basis for the understanding of drug-resistance in γ-herpesviruses [Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and Kaposi's sarcoma associated herpesvirus (KSHV)] TK and PK through the use of animal surrogate models.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains a common complication after allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation. Letermovir is an antiviral drug that inhibits the CMV-terminase complex. METHODS: In this phase 3, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned CMV-seropositive transplant recipients, 18 years of age or older, in a 2:1 ratio to receive letermovir or placebo, administered orally or intravenously, through week 14 after transplantation; randomization was stratified according to trial site and CMV disease risk. Letermovir was administered at a dose of 480 mg per day (or 240 mg per day in patients taking cyclosporine). Patients in whom clinically significant CMV infection (CMV disease or CMV viremia leading to preemptive treatment) developed discontinued the trial regimen and received anti-CMV treatment. The primary end point was the proportion of patients, among patients without detectable CMV DNA at randomization, who had clinically significant CMV infection through week 24 after transplantation. Patients who discontinued the trial or had missing end-point data at week 24 were imputed as having a primary end-point event. Patients were followed through week 48 after transplantation. RESULTS: From June 2014 to March 2016, a total of 565 patients underwent randomization and received letermovir or placebo beginning a median of 9 days after transplantation. Among 495 patients with undetectable CMV DNA at randomization, fewer patients in the letermovir group than in the placebo group had clinically significant CMV infection or were imputed as having a primary end-point event by week 24 after transplantation (122 of 325 patients [37.5%] vs. 103 of 170 [60.6%], P

Because ganciclovir resistance mutations in the cytomegalovirus UL97 gene most commonly occur at codons 460, 520 and 590-607, diagnostic genotyping for drug resistance has often omitted the analysis of codons below 440. However, the UL97 kinase inhibitor maribavir selects for distinctive resistance mutations at codons 409 and 411, and ganciclovir/maribavir resistance mutations have also been described in the ATP binding region starting at codon 335. Expanded genotypic testing of UL97 codons 335-440 in 1535 clinical specimens disclosed 10 uncharacterized sequence variants that were phenotyped for ganciclovir and maribavir susceptibility. Notable findings included low-grade ganciclovir resistance conferred by amino acid substitutions K359N and E362D, decreased maribavir susceptibility of L348V, and maribavir hypersensitivity of V345I and E362D. Recently published substitutions F342Y and K359E/Q were also confirmed. The data indicate that mutations in the UL97 ATP binding region may arise in clinical specimens to affect the interpretation of ganciclovir and maribavir resistance. This region should now be included in the standard diagnostic genotyping of UL97, especially with the introduction of maribavir into therapeutic use.

BKV is ubiquitous with 80-90% seropositivity. BKV establishes latency in kidney tubular epithelial/urothelial cells but is shed in urine. Reactivation may cause interstitial nephritis (BKV-IN) after renal transplant (Ktxp) and hemorrhagic cystitis (HC) and/or BKV-IN after allo-HSCT. BKV-HC occurs 2-8 wks after HSCT. Diagnosis requires: cystitis, macroscopic hematuria and urine (U) BK VL >7log10 copies/ml. High-level BK viruria occurs in >80% post allo-HSCT but only 5-20% develop HC. Plasma (PL) VLs are elevated in 60% and declining PL-VL correlates with improvement. Re-activation risk factors include young age, male sex; high risk donor; HSCT conditioning with CTX, busulfan, TBI; and grade 2-4 GVHD. Therapy is supportive. There are no FDA approved agents for BKV. Cidofovir (CDV), leflunomide, and FQs have in-vitro BKV activity but clinical use is not supported by rigorous trials. Pooled IVIg contains BKV antibodies. Reduction of immunosuppression improves BKV-IN in Ktxp recipients but is ineffective in allo-HSCT BKV-HC. For >30 years 1st line therapy for malaria has been Artesunate (ART), an artemisinin derivative with a good safety profile. ART has an antiviral spectrum including herpesviruses, HBV, HCV, HIV and BKV. ART inhibits BKV replication in human renal tissue culture via activation of transcription factors NF-κB / Sp-1 and concentration dependent down regulation of phosphorylation by kinase PI3K without cellular cytotoxicity. In-vitro, ATV is synergistic and/or additive with CDV, GCV and Maribavir. Case reports/series of ART use in CMV, HHV6, and resistant HSV-2, are published. CASE: A 22yo M w R/R (see table) T/HRLBCL IIIB underwent a haplo-SCT in PR. At week +8 he developed gross hematuria, cystitis (9-10/10 pain), and urinary outlet obstruction. U-/PL-BK VLs were >100,000,000/ 7.9 mg/dl). PL-BKV VL rose to 196,537copies/ml and both ureters obstructed necessitating bilateral nephrostomy drains. We requested ART via an eIND from the FDA and current US manufacturer. ART load (2.4 mg/kg IV Q 12H x2) followed by 2.4 mg/kg/d administered x 14 d. Cystitis pain fell from 9-10 to 0-2/10 by day 4. U-/PL-BKV VLs fell to 91,980 / There was a strong temporal association between ART treatment and clinical response. CDV and IVIg therapy may also have contributed to the observed improvement. ART therapy may be an emerging option for BKV-IN and HC and further research is warranted.

Introduction In transplant recipients, CMV infection RR to prior antiviral Tx is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Existing antivirals are not approved for RR CMV infection and are limited by their toxicities. A prior Phase 2 dose-ranging study of MBV for RR CMV (67% of patients [pts] achieved undetectable CMV DNA within 6 wks) motivated initiation of a Phase 3 trial with the concept of an investigator-assigned (IA) Tx comparator arm. Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of MBV compared with IA anti-CMV therapies in HSCT/SOT recipients with RR CMV infection. Methods In this Phase 3, randomized, open-label, multicenter, active-controlled study (NCT02931539), HSCT/SOT recipients (≥12 years old) with RR CMV infection are randomized 2:1 to MBV (400 mg BID) or IA Tx (ganciclovir [GCV], valganciclovir [VGC], foscarnet [FSC], cidofovir [CDV]) for 8 wks. Pts in the IA Tx group discontinuing Tx early (lack of response and/or intolerance; investigator discretion) are assessed Wks 3–7 to enter MBV rescue arm. Pts are followed for 12 wks after the 8-wk Tx period. Inclusion criteria include: documented CMV infection with screening value ≥2730 IU/mL / ≥910 IU/mL (whole blood / plasma) in 2 consecutive tests ≥1 day apart; current refractory CMV infection: documented failure to achieve >1 log10 decrease in CMV DNA after ≥14 days of the same anti-CMV Tx. Pts with ≥1 genetic mutation associated with GCV/VGC, FSC or CDV resistance must also meet refractory criteria. Pts with tissue invasive CMV disease with CNS involvement including the retina, eg CMV retinitis, are excluded. A central specialty laboratory quantifies plasma CMV DNA (COBAS ‘AmpliPrep/TaqMan' CMV test). The primary efficacy endpoint is confirmed CMV viremia clearance (defined as plasma CMV DNA concentrations Results Planned enrollment is 351 pts across ∼140 sites (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific). Study start, Dec 2016; completion ∼Sep 2020. Conclusions The comparator arm of this Phase 3 study is valid for evaluating efficacy and safety of MBV for RR CMV compared with available anti-CMV Tx, whilst allowing for personalized Tx for pts in the comparator group.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a significant complication in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients. Four antiviral drugs are used for preventing or treating CMV: ganciclovir, valganciclovir, foscarnet, and cidofovir. With prolonged and repeated use of these drugs, CMV can become resistant to standard therapy, resulting in increased morbidity and mortality, especially in HCT recipients. Antiviral drug resistance should be suspected when CMV viremia (DNAemia or antigenemia) fails to improve or continue to increase after 2 weeks of appropriately dosed and delivered antiviral therapy. CMV resistance is diagnosed by detecting specific genetic mutations. UL97 mutations confer resistance to ganciclovir and valganciclovir, and a UL54 mutation confers multidrug resistance. Risk factors for resistance include prolonged or previous anti-CMV drug exposure or inadequate dosing, absorption, or bioavailability. Host risk factors include type of HCT and degree of immunosuppression. Depending on the genotyping results, multiple strategies can be adopted to treat resistant CMV infections, albeit no randomized clinical trials exist so far, after reducing immunosuppression (if possible): ganciclovir dose escalation, ganciclovir and foscarnet combination, and adjunct therapy such as CMV-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte infusions. Novel therapies such as maribavir, brincidofovir, and letermovir should be further studied for treatment of resistant CMV.

Introduction: Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a major contributor of morbidity and mortality, and its management is essential for the successful outcome of solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell t...

In a Phase 2 clinical trial, 120 subjects with cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection refractory or resistant to standard therapy were randomized equally to 3 doses of oral maribavir treatment, and 70% achieved undetectable plasma CMV DNA within 12 weeks. At study entry, standard diagnostic UL97 genotyping was available for 71 subjects, with 60 (85%) revealing well-characterized ganciclovir resistance mutations that did not preclude a therapeutic response to maribavir. Central laboratory testing of a range of UL97 codons (288-468) not fully covered by standard genotyping was done on 93 subjects at baseline. This detected no previously known maribavir resistance mutations, but identified atypical mutations in 3 subjects, including a P-loop substitution F342Y, and ATP-binding region substitutions K359E/Q. By recombinant phenotyping, K359E and K359Q each conferred a nearly 4-fold increased ganciclovir 50% inhibitory concentration (EC50) without maribavir resistance, whereas F342Y conferred a 6-fold increased ganciclovir EC50 and a 4.5-fold increased maribavir EC50. The subject with F342Y detected at baseline did not achieve plasma CMV DNA clearance after 12 weeks of maribavir therapy and later developed an additional UL97 substitution H411Y known to confer 12- to 20-fold increased MBV EC50 by itself. The combination of F342Y and H411Y was shown to increase the maribavir EC50 by 56-fold. Diagnostic genotyping of UL97 should be expanded to cover the ATP-binding region beginning at codon 335 to enable the detection of atypical resistance mutations and further correlation of their clinical significance.

International audience; Prophylactic or preemptive treatment strategies are required to prevent human cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections in transplant recipients. However, treatment failure occurs when CMV resistant-associated variants (RAVs) are selected. Although the diversity of CMV is lower than that of RNA viruses, CMV appears to show some genetic instability, with possible minor emerging resistance that may be undetectable by Sanger sequencing. We aimed to examine CMV-resistance mutations over time by ultra-deep sequencing (UDS) and Sanger sequencing in a kidney transplant recipient experiencing CMV infection. This patient showed a transient response to three different antiviral drugs (valganciclovir, foscarnet, and maribavir) and four episodes of CMV resistance over two years. The full-length UL97 (2.3kpb) and partial UL54 (2.4kpb) CMV genes were studied by UDS and Sanger sequencing and linkage mutations calculated to determine RAVs. We detected four major and five minor resistance mutations. Minor resistant variants (2-20%) were detected by UDS, whereas major resistance substitutions (>20%) were identified by both UDS and Sanger method. We detected cross-resistance to three drugs, despite high CMV loads, suggesting that the fitness of the viral mutants was not impaired. In conclusion, CMV showed complex dynamic of resistance under antiviral drug pressure, as described for highly variable viruses. The emergence of successive RAVs constitutes a clinically challenging complication and contributes to the difficulty of therapeutic management of patients.

We have recently shown that the artemisinin derivative artemisone, which was screened against malaria in human clinical studies, is a potent inhibitor of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV). Here we evaluated the antiviral effect of artemisone when employed in 2-drug combinations with approved and experimental anti-HCMV agents. Using the Chou-Talalay method, we found that in-vitro combination of artemisone with cidofovir, brincidofovir, or with the HCMV UL97 inhibitor maribavir resulted in antiviral synergism and the combination of artemisone with ganciclovir or with the viral terminase inhibitors letermovir and BDCRB resulted in moderate synergism. Importantly, the combination of artemisone with maribavir demonstrated synergistic antiviral activity ex-vivo, in a clinically-relevant multicellular model of human placental tissues maintained in organ culture. Our findings provide the basis for the use of artemisone in synergistically acting drug combinations, to enhance viral control and reduce antiviral drug toxicities.

The prevention and treatment of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infections is based on the use of antiviral agents that currently target the viral DNA polymerase and that may cause serious side effects. The search for novel inhibitors against HCMV infection led to the discovery of new molecular targets, the viral terminase complex and the viral pUL97 kinase. The most advanced compounds consist of letermovir (LMV) and maribavir (MBV). LMV inhibits the cleavage of viral DNA and its packaging into capsids by targeting the HCMV terminase complex. LMV is safe and well tolerated and exhibits pharmacokinetic properties that allow once daily dosing. LMV showed efficacy in a phase III prophylaxis study in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients seropositive for HCMV. LMV was recently approved under the trade name Prevymis™ for prophylaxis of HCMV infection in adult seropositive recipients of an allogeneic HSCT. Amino acid substitutions conferring resistance to LMV selected in vitro map primarily to the pUL56 and rarely to the pUL89 and pUL51 subunits of the HCMV terminase complex. MBV is an inhibitor of the viral pUL97 kinase activity and interferes with the morphogenesis and nuclear egress of nascent viral particles. MBV is safe and well tolerated and has an excellent oral bioavailability. MBV was effective for the treatment of HCMV infections (including those that are refractory or drug-resistant) in transplant recipients in two phase II studies and is further evaluated in two phase III trials. Mutations conferring resistance to MBV map to the UL97 gene and can cause cross-resistance to ganciclovir. MBV-resistant mutations also emerged in the UL27 gene in vitro and could compensate for the inhibition of pUL97 kinase activity by MBV. Thus, LMV and probably MBV will broaden the armamentarium of antiviral drugs available for the prevention and treatment of HCMV infections.

Introduction Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant recipients. Ganciclovir-resistant (gan-R) CMV is an emerging concern associated with potent immunosuppression and increased durations of antiviral exposure. Limited data exists regarding efficacy of maribavir and letermovir for treatment and secondary prophylaxis in resistant CMV. Case Report We report a series of 3 lung transplant recipients with gan-R CMV infection treated with maribavir or letermovir between June 1, 2015 and June 1, 2020. Maribavir and letermovir were initiated as monotherapy for CMV treatment in 3 and 1 patients, respectively, with maribavir dosing per institutional study protocol. Patient A was transitioned to letermovir prophylaxis following maribavir treatment. Patient C was transferred to an outside hospital for CMV T-cell therapy and was not discharged on antiviral prophylaxis. Both maribavir and letermovir were well-tolerated by patients. Summary Maribavir 200 mg twice daily resulted in CMV viral suppression in one patient. Patients B and C received much shorter durations of maribavir treatment, which may have been associated with delayed quantitative viral reduction as described in the literature, and subsequent transition to alternative therapy. Further research is needed to evaluate the impact of salvage therapy with maribavir or letermovir on patient outcomes.

Despite a remarkable reduction in the past decades, cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients remains a feared complication, still associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Today, first line treatment of CMV infection/reactivation is still based on dated antiviral compounds Ganciclovir (GCV), Foscarnet (FOS) and Cidofovir (CDF) with their burdensome weight of side effects. Maribavir (MBV), Letermovir (LMV) and Brincidofovir (BDF) are three new promising anti-CMV drugs without myelosuppressive properties or renal toxic effects that are under investigation in randomized phase II and III trials. Adoptive T-cell therapy (ATCT) in CMV infection possesses a strong rationale, demonstrated by several proof of concept studies; its feasibility is currently under investigation by clinical trials. ATCT from third-party and naïve donors could meet the needs of HSCT recipients of seronegative donors and cord blood grafts. In selected patients such as recipients of T-cell depleted grafts, ATCT, based on CMV-specific host T-cells reconstitution kinetics, would be of value in the prophylactic and/or preemptive CMV treatment. Vaccine-immunotherapy has the difficult task to reduce the incidence of CMV reactivation/infection in highly immunocompromised HSCT patients. Newer notions on CMV biology may represent the base to flush out the Troll of transplantation.

Background Ganciclovir has demonstrated immunosuppressive effects in vitro which may lead to delayed cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific immune reconstitution when the drug is given prophylactically. Maribavir is a new and more potent anti-CMV drug that is under evaluation for therapeutic use in transplant recipients. Objectives The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential effect of maribavir on CMV-specific T cell function in comparison to ganciclovir. Study design In ten immunocompetent CMV seropositive donors, maribavir and ganciclovir were compared over a broad range of concentrations (0.2–500μM) regarding their effects on lymphoproliferation, CMV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ cytokine expression, T cell multifunctionality, degranulation and apoptosis. Results Maribavir inhibited lymphocyte proliferation at concentrations of 50μM and above, however, cytokine expression, cellular degranulation and multifunctionality of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in response to CMV lysate and pp65 peptide mix were not impaired except at the highest concentration of 500μM. Ganciclovir inhibited lymphoproliferative responses starting at 10μM. As with maribavir, other cellular responses following stimulation with CMV lysate and pp65 peptide mix were only impaired at the highest concentration of 500μM of ganciclovir. Neither maribavir nor ganciclovir showed induction of lymphocyte apoptosis. Conclusions Maribavir exhibits a low potential to suppress CMV-specific T cell function. This finding supports the use of higher doses in the prophylactic setting than originally proposed.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) drug resistance mutation maps are updated with recent information for polymerase inhibitors, the terminase inhibitor letermovir and the UL97 kinase inhibitor maribavir. Newly mapped mutations and their phenotypes provide more detail on cross-resistance properties and suggest the need to expand the CMV gene regions covered in diagnostic testing. Next-generation deep sequencing technology offers a more sensitive, higher resolution view of emerging antiviral resistance and is recommended for use in clinical trials. Issues of standardization and diagnostic utility in comparison with traditional Sanger sequencing remain unresolved. Quality control is important for the accurate and reproducible detection of mutant viral populations in clinical specimens.

Background Double-stranded (ds) DNA virus infections often occur concomitantly in immunocompromised patients. We performed a systematic search of published in vitro activity for nine approved and investigational antivirals to understand the spectrum of in vitro activity against dsDNA viruses. Methods A literature search was performed (PubMed and the WoS Core Collection) using keywords related to: 1) targeted approved/developmental antivirals (acyclovir, artesunate, brincidofovir, cidofovir, cyclopropavir (filociclovir), foscarnet, ganciclovir, letermovir, and maribavir); 2) pathogenic dsDNA viruses; 3) in vitro activity. We summarized data from 210 publications. Results Activity against ≤3 viruses was documented for maribavir (cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus), and letermovir, while activity against > 3 viruses was shown for ganciclovir, cidofovir, acyclovir, foscarnet, cyclopropavir, artesunate, and brincidofovir. The EC50 values of brincidofovir were the lowest, ranging from 0.001 to 0.27 μM, for all viruses except papillomaviruses. The next most potent agents included cidofovir, ganciclovir, foscarnet, and acyclovir with EC50 values between 0.1 μM and >10 μM for cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex virus, and adenovirus. Conclusion Most of the identified antivirals had in vitro activity against more than one dsDNA virus. Brincidofovir and cidofovir have broad-spectrum activity, and brincidofovir has the lowest EC50 values. These findings could assist clinical practice and developmental research.

Summary Cytomegalovirus is one of the most important infections to occur after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and an increasing number of reports indicate that cytomegalovirus is also a potentially important pathogen in patients treated with recently introduced drugs for hematological malignancies. Expert recommendations have been produced by the 2017 European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia (ECIL 7) after a review of the literature on the diagnosis and management of cytomegalovirus in patients after HSCT and in patients receiving other types of therapy for haematological malignancies. These recommendations cover diagnosis, preventive strategies such as prophylaxis and pre-emptive therapy, and management of cytomegalovirus disease. Antiviral drugs including maribavir and letermovir are in development and prospective clinical trials have recently been completed. However, management of patients with resistant or refractory cytomegalovirus infection or cytomegalovirus disease is a challenge. In this Review we summarise the reviewed literature and the recommendations of the ECIL 7 for management of cytomegalovirus in patients with haematological malignancies.

Epstein⁻Barr virus (EBV) infects up to 95% of the adult human population, with primary infection typically occurring during childhood and usually asymptomatic. However, EBV can cause infectious mononucleosis in approximately 35⁻50% cases when infection occurs during adolescence and early adulthood. Epstein⁻Barr virus is also associated with several B-cell malignancies including Burkitt lymphoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease. A number of antiviral drugs have proven to be effective inhibitors of EBV replication, yet have resulted in limited success clinically, and none of them has been approved for treatment of EBV infections. ispartof: Cancers vol:10 issue:6 pages:197-197 ispartof: location:Switzerland status: published

Over the past 25 years, several randomized controlled trials have investigated the efficacy of different antiviral agents for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. We performed a systematic literature review, conventional meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis using a random-effects model and risk ratios (RRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as effect estimates. Fifteen randomized controlled trials were identified, including 7 different antiviral agents: acyclovir, ganciclovir, maribavir, brincidofovir, letermovir, valacyclovir, and vaccine. Twelve trials used placebo as comparator while 3 trials compared different antiviral agents. We found evidence for CMV disease and infection being significantly reduced by antiviral prophylaxis, with an RR of .66 (95% CI, .48 to .90) and .63 (95% CI, .50 to .79). Across the network, ganciclovir showed the best relative efficacy for CMV disease while letermovir provided first rank of being the best option for CMV infection. The risk for death was not significantly influenced by antiviral prophylaxis in the meta-analysis, with an RR of .92 (95% CI, .78 to 1.08), as well as in the network meta-analysis. In terms of safety, letermovir was at least similar in comparison with placebo and most agents while both letermovir and acyclovir showed significantly reduced risk for serious adverse events compared with ganciclovir, with RRs of .55 (95% CI, .30 to 1.00) for letermovir and .63 (95% CI, .42 to .93) for acyclovir. With a probability of 81%, letermovir appears to be the best option in terms of safety. Future randomized head-to-head comparisons are needed to evaluate the definite efficacy and safety of different prophylactic strategies.

The development of cytomegalovirus (CMV) drug resistance has become an emerging clinical challenge. In kidney transplant recipients (KTR), CMV infection is a risk factor for acute rejection, has a detrimental effect on patient survival, and predisposes patients to secondary opportunistic infections. We report here the case of a kidney transplant patient on valganciclovir prophylaxis who developed recurrent CMV infections, complicated by UL97 ganciclovir (GCV) resistance. Our patient underwent unsuccessful treatment courses with high dose GCV, foscarnet and cidofovir. Compassionate use maribavir was initiated and resulted in full recovery. Through this case report and literature review, we highlight potential strategies for the successful management of CMV resistance.

Introduction Maribavir, a potent and orally bioavailable antiviral, is being evaluated in Phase 3 trials for the treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections in transplant patients. Often numerous concomitant medications are administered to these patients to manage their comorbidities. A thorough evaluation of maribavir potential for drug–drug interactions (DDIs) is warranted and required for the regulatory approval. Objectives To thoroughly evaluate potential DDIs for maribavir. Methods Extensive in vitro studies were conducted to evaluate the potential involvement of cytochrome P450s (CYPs), uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) and transporters on the disposition of maribavir, as well as the inhibitory and induction effect of maribavir on these enzymes and transporters. Clinical Phase 1 studies included a human mass-balance study, two probe-cocktail studies, and five DDI studies with ketoconazole, rifampin, antacid, voriconazole, and tacrolimus. Results Maribavir is metabolized primarily in the liver through CYP3A4 (70–85%) and CYP1A2 (15–30%). Renal clearance is a minor route ( Conclusions Maribavir has low risk for DDI. Inhibitors of CYP3A4 and/or P-gp may increase maribavir exposure, but dose adjustment of maribavir is not necessary. Potent inducers of CYP3A4 and P-gp decrease maribavir exposure, necessitating maribavir dose increase. Maribavir may increase exposure of immunosuppressants, such as tacrolimus. Therefore, monitoring of concomitant immunosuppressants' blood concentration should be considered at initiation, co-administration, and discontinuation of maribavir. Maribavir is not expected to interact with other concurrent medications.

The purpose of this study is to provide updated information on diagnosis of cytomegalovirus (CMV) drug resistance, treatments for drug-resistant infection and potential uses of experimental antiviral compounds.For established CMV antivirals, uncommon viral UL97 kinase and UL54 DNA polymerase drug resistance mutations are sporadically described that expand an extensive existing database. Some novel mutations reported from treated patients have no drug-resistant phenotype and may be genotyping artefacts. Next-generation sequencing technology may enable earlier detection of emerging resistance mutations in treated patients. Management options for drug-resistant infection include optimization of host defenses, antiviral dose escalation, substitutions or combinations of standard or experimental antivirals. Maribavir and letermovir have antiviral targets distinct from the classic DNA polymerase. UL97 mutations elicited by ganciclovir and maribavir are different, although a single p-loop mutation can confer significant cross-resistance. High-grade resistance mutations in the UL56 terminase gene are readily selected in vitro under letermovir and await clinical correlation.Technical advancements can enhance the accurate and timely genotypic detection of drug resistance. Antivirals undergoing clinical trial offer the prospect of new viral targets and drug combinations, but unresolved issues exist with regard to their therapeutic potential for drug-resistant CMV and their genetic barriers to resistance.

BackgroundCytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a leading cause of illness and death in patients who have undergone allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation. Available treatments are restricted by clinically significant toxic effects and drug resistance. MethodsIn this phase 2 study, we evaluated the effect of letermovir (also known as AIC246), a new anti-CMV drug with a novel mechanism of action, on the incidence and time to onset of prophylaxis failure in CMV-seropositive recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplants from matched related or unrelated donors. From March 2010 through October 2011, we randomly assigned 131 transplant recipients in a 3:1 ratio to three sequential study cohorts according to a double-blind design. Patients received oral letermovir (at a dose of 60, 120, or 240 mg per day, or matching placebo) for 12 weeks after engraftment. The primary end point was all-cause prophylaxis failure, defined as discontinuation of the study drug because of CMV antigen or DNA detection,...

Methylenecyclopropane nucleoside (MCPN) analogs are being investigated for treatment of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection because of favorable preclinical data and limited ganciclovir cross-resistance. Monohydroxymethyl MCPNs bearing ether and thioether functionalities at the purine 6 position have antiviral activity against herpes simplex virus (HSV) and varicella-zoster virus (VZV) in addition to HCMV. The role of the HCMV UL97 kinase in the mechanism of action of these derivatives was examined. When tested against a kinase-inactive UL97 K355M virus, a moderate 5- to 7-fold increase in 50% effective concentration (EC 50 ) was observed, in comparison to a 13- to 25-fold increase for either cyclopropavir or ganciclovir. Serial propagation of HCMV under two of these compounds selected for three novel UL97 mutations encoding amino acid substitutions D456N, C480R,and Y617del. When transferred to baseline laboratory HCMV strains, these mutations individually conferred resistance to all of the tested MCPNs, ganciclovir, and maribavir. However, the engineered strains also demonstrated severe growth defects and abnormal cytopathic effects similar to the kinase-inactive mutant. Expressed and purified UL97 kinase showed in vitro phosphorylation of the newly tested MCPNs. Thus, HCMV UL97 kinase is involved in the antiviral action of these MCPNs, but the in vitro selection of UL97-defective viruses suggests that their activity against more typical ganciclovir-resistant growth-competent UL97 mutants may be relatively preserved.

Introduction Maribavir, a potent and orally bioavailable antiviral, is being evaluated in Phase 3 trials for the treatment of CMV infections in transplant patients and received FDA Breakthrough Therapy designation. A thorough understanding of the clinical pharmacology of maribavir is necessary to guide the appropriate use of the drug in transplant patients who often have multiple comorbidities and require complex concurrent medication regimens. Objectives To summarize the clinical pharmacology data of maribavir. Methods Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessments were performed in sixteen Phase 1 studies and three Phase 2 studies. Data were summarized to characterize maribavir's disposition (absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion) in healthy adult subjects and special populations (HIV-infected, hepatically impaired, renally impaired, and organ transplant recipients). A definitive QT study was conducted to evaluate the cardiac repolarization effect. The drug interaction risks were assessed using both nonclinical and clinical studies. Results Maribavir is primarily eliminated through the CYP3A4 pathway and has a half-life of 5–7 hours. Co-administration with food or antacid, or crushing the tablet, had no impact on maribavir's exposure. Maribavir binds to plasma proteins with unbound fraction estimated at 1.5% and can penetrate the blood–retinal barrier. No pharmacokinetic difference is found among healthy subjects, transplant patients, subjects with severe renal impairment, or moderate hepatic impairment. Maribavir's exposure is increased by 46% by ketoconazole and decreased by 61% by rifampin. Maribavir increases tacrolimus exposure by 51%, does not affect voriconazole exposure, and is not expected to affect exposures of most other concurrent medications. Maribavir has no effects on QT intervals. Conclusions Extensive clinical pharmacology data have been generated to support the clinical use and dose of maribavir for the treatment of CMV infections in transplant recipients. Maribavir can be taken with or without food. No maribavir dose adjustment is needed in patients with mild-to-moderate hepatic impairment or renal impairment or with concurrent medications, except for CYP3A4 inducers.

Background Limited treatment options exist for ganciclovir-resistant CMV disease. Foscarnet can cause renal insufficiency, and maribavir has poor ocular penetration. Letermovir is approved for primary CMV prophylaxis in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, but efficacy in treatment of CMV disease or secondary prophylaxis is not known. Methods We analyzed data from all adult patients at a single center who initiated letermovir for treatment of CMV disease or secondary prophylaxis of CMV retinitis from November 2017 through April 2018. We described patient characteristics, extent of CMV disease, prior antiviral therapies, kinetics of CMV DNAemia, and clinical outcomes. Results Four patients received letermovir for treatment, and one for secondary suppression, of CMV DNAemia and CMV retinitis (table). All patients had proven genotypic resistance with complications and/or clinical failure on prior antivirals. Letermovirdoses ranged from 480 mg to 720 mg daily. Three patients received concomitant CMV immune globulin and intravitreal therapy with foscarnet and/or ganciclovir. No patients developed side effects attributable to letermovir, and expected increases in tacrolimus levels occurred. All five patients demonstrated clinical and retinoscopic improvement (Figure 1), but two patients did not achieve complete resolution of DNAemia (Figure 2). Table: Patient Characteristics A. 66-Year-Old Male B. 50-Year-Old Male C. 46-Year-Old Male D. 66-Year-Old Male E. 43-Year-Old Female CMV risk factor(s) Lung txp Lung txp Heart txp Heart txp Susac syndrome Disease burden CMV syndrome Retinitis CMV syndrome Retinitis CMV syndrome Retinitis Colitis Retinitis Retinitis Previous antivirals C, G/V, M, F G/V, F, M G/V, F C, G/V, F G, F CMV mutations M460V Q578H M460I H520Q, C603W, T503I A594V Current letermovir duration (weeks) 9.5 9.5 7 5 26a aSecondary prophylaxis only. C, CMV Immune globulin; F, foscarnet; G, ganciclovir; M, maribavir; txp, transplant; V, valganciclovir. Conclusion Use of letermovir, often in combination with intravitreal therapy, was associated with sustained clinical improvement in five patients with CMV retinitis. Treatment doses of up to 720 mg were well tolerated. Despite marked improvement of ocular disease, two patients did not achieve sustained suppression of DNAemia. Disclosures C. R. Wolfe, Merck: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee.

Introduction: Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infections are still significant causes of morbidity and mortality in transplant recipients. Approved compounds ganciclovir (GCV), foscarnet (FOS) and cidofovir (CDV) are limited by toxicity and evolving resistance in patients with impaired cell-mediated immunity. New substances with new mechanisms of action and lesser toxicity issues are required. Maribavir (MBV) is a benzimidazole l-riboside and acts as a competitive inhibitor of the HCMV UL97 protein. MBV was discovered at the University of Michigan and originally developed by GlaxoSmithKline. In 2003, the substance was licensed to ViroPharma. The drug is orally applicable and exhibited antiviral potency against different HCMV strains including strains resistant to GCV, CDV and FOS. Areas covered: This article examines the published pharmacokinetic, safety and efficacy data from Phase I, Phase II and Phase III studies as well reports of antiviral resistance. Expert opinion: Although MBV exhibits a desired new ...

Human cytomegalovirus UL97 kinase mutations that commonly confer ganciclovir resistance cluster in different parts of the gene than those conferring resistance to maribavir, an experimental UL97 kinase inhibitor. The drug resistance, growth, and autophosphorylation phenotypes of several unusual UL97 mutations in the kinase catalytic domain were characterized. Mutations V466G and P521L, described in clinical specimens from ganciclovir-treated subjects, conferred a UL97 kinase knockout phenotype with no autophosphorylation, a severe growth defect, and high-level ganciclovir, cyclopropavir, and maribavir resistance, similar to mutations at the catalytic lysine residue K355. Mutations F342S and V356G, observed after propagation under cyclopropavir in vitro , showed much less growth attenuation and moderate- to high-level resistance to all three drugs while maintaining UL97 autophosphorylation competence and normal cytopathic effect in cell culture, a novel phenotype. F342S is located in the ATP-binding P-loop and is homologous to a c-Abl kinase mutation conferring resistance to imatinib. UL97 mutants with relatively preserved growth fitness and multidrug resistance are of greater concern in antiviral therapy than the severely growth-impaired UL97 knockout mutants. Current diagnostic genotyping assays are unlikely to detect F342S and V356G, and the frequency of their appearance in clinical specimens remains undefined.