1. Randomised Phase 1b/2 trial of tepotinib vs sorafenib in Asian patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with MET overexpression
- Author
-
Chia Jui Yen, Ho Yeong Lim, Juergen Scheele, J. Straub, Joong-Won Park, Hongming Pan, Tae-You Kim, Shukui Qin, Baek Yeol Ryoo, Dongli Zhou, K. Berghoff, Kun Ming Rau, Hye Jin Choi, Ann Li Cheng, Jee Hyun Kim, and Zhenggang Ren
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Sorafenib ,Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Carcinoma, Hepatocellular ,Hepatocellular carcinoma ,Administration, Oral ,Gastroenterology ,Drug Administration Schedule ,Article ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Asian People ,Piperidines ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Clinical endpoint ,Humans ,Adverse effect ,Trial registration ,Objective response ,Aged ,030304 developmental biology ,0303 health sciences ,business.industry ,Liver Neoplasms ,Middle Aged ,Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-met ,medicine.disease ,Survival Analysis ,Confidence interval ,Up-Regulation ,Pyridazines ,Pyrimidines ,Treatment Outcome ,Oncology ,Molecularly targeted therapy ,Anticancer treatment ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Female ,business ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Background This open-label, Phase 1b/2 study evaluated the highly selective MET inhibitor tepotinib in systemic anticancer treatment (SACT)-naive Asian patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) with MET overexpression. Methods In Phase 2b, tepotinib was orally administered once daily (300, 500 or 1,000 mg) to Asian adults with aHCC. The primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and adverse events (AEs). Phase 2 randomised SACT-naive Asian adults with aHCC with MET overexpression to tepotinib (recommended Phase 2 dose [RP2D]) or sorafenib 400 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was independently assessed time to progression (TTP). Results In Phase 1b (n = 27), no DLTs occurred; the RP2D was 500 mg. In Phase 2 (n = 90, 45 patients per arm), the primary endpoint was met: independently assessed TTP was significantly longer with tepotinib versus sorafenib (median 2.9 versus 1.4 months, HR = 0.42, 90% confidence interval: 0.26–0.70, P = 0.0043). Progression-free survival and objective response also favoured tepotinib. Treatment-related Grade ≥3 AE rates were 28.9% with tepotinib and 45.5% with sorafenib. Conclusions Tepotinib improved TTP versus sorafenib and was generally well tolerated in SACT-naive Asian patients with aHCC with MET overexpression. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01988493.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF