1. Use of intravenous iron and risk of anaphylaxis
- Author
-
Nicholas Moore, Patrick Blin, Jochen Dress, Antje Timmer, Jacques Benichou, Jonas Reinold, Ron M.C. Herings, Edeltraut Garbe, Ingvild Odsbu, Susana Perez-Gutthann, Nuria Saigi-Morgui, Gunnar Toft, Vera Ehrenstein, Cécile Droz-Perroteau, Andreas J. Bircher, D. S. Rampton, Michael Forstner, Carla Franzoni, Elisabeth Smits, Joan Fortuny, Régis Lassalle, Katherine Rascher, Gero von Gersdorff, Mathias Schaller, Kenneth J. Rothman, Jetty A. Overbeek, Tania Schink, Marie Linder, Bianca Kollhorst, Lawrence Rasouliyan, Lia Gutierrez, RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Institute International (RTI International), University of Cologne, CIC Bordeaux, Université Bordeaux Segalen - Bordeaux 2-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Karolinska Institutet [Stockholm], PHARMO Institute for Drug Outcomes Research, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Leibniz Association, Aarhus University [Aarhus], Carl Von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam [Amsterdam] (VU), CHU Rouen, Normandie Université (NU), Université de Rouen Normandie (UNIROUEN), University Hospital Basel [Basel], Università della Svizzera italiana = University of Italian Switzerland (USI), Royal Free Hospital [London, UK], General practice, and Epidemiology and Data Science
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,severe hypersensitivity reactions ,Epidemiology ,Iron ,Pharmacy ,01 natural sciences ,Cohort Studies ,010104 statistics & probability ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,anaphylaxis ,cohort study ,Humans ,Pharmacology (medical) ,Cumulative incidence ,030212 general & internal medicine ,0101 mathematics ,IV iron ,Anaphylaxis ,Dextran ,business.industry ,Original Articles ,medicine.disease ,Severe hypersensitivity reactions ,Confidence interval ,3. Good health ,Penicillin ,Europe ,dextran ,Ambulatory ,Observational study ,Administration, Intravenous ,Original Article ,[SDV.SPEE]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologie ,business ,Cohort study ,multidatabase ,Multidatabase ,medicine.drug - Abstract
International audience; PURPOSE: This post-authorisation safety study estimated the risk of anaphylaxis in patients receiving intravenous (IV) iron in Europe, with interest in iron dextran and iron non-dextrans. Studies conducted in the United States have reported risk of anaphylaxis to IV iron ranging from 2.0 to 6.8 per 10 000 first treatments. METHODS: Cohort study of IV iron new users, captured mostly through pharmacy ambulatory dispensing, from populations covered by health and administrative data sources in five European countries from 1999 to 2017. Anaphylaxis events were identified through an algorithm that used parenteral penicillin as a positive control. RESULTS: A total of 304 210 patients with a first IV iron treatment (6367 iron dextran), among whom 13–16 anaphylaxis cases were identified and reported as a range to comply with data protection regulations. The pooled unadjusted incidence proportion (IP) ranged from 0.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2–0.9) to 0.5 (95% CI, 0.3–1.0) per 10 000 first treatments. No events were identified at first dextran treatments. There were 231 294 first penicillin treatments with 30 potential cases of anaphylaxis (IP = 1.2; 95% CI, 0.8–1.7 per 10 000 treatments). CONCLUSION: We found an IP of anaphylaxis from 0.4 to 0.5 per 10 000 first IV iron treatments. The study captured only a fraction of IV iron treatments administered in hospitals, where most first treatments are likely to happen. Due to this limitation, the study could not exclude a differential risk of anaphylaxis between iron dextran and iron non-dextrans. The IP of anaphylaxis in users of penicillin was consistent with incidences reported in the literature.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF