Back to Search Start Over

Use of intravenous iron and risk of anaphylaxis

Authors :
Nicholas Moore
Patrick Blin
Jochen Dress
Antje Timmer
Jacques Benichou
Jonas Reinold
Ron M.C. Herings
Edeltraut Garbe
Ingvild Odsbu
Susana Perez-Gutthann
Nuria Saigi-Morgui
Gunnar Toft
Vera Ehrenstein
Cécile Droz-Perroteau
Andreas J. Bircher
D. S. Rampton
Michael Forstner
Carla Franzoni
Elisabeth Smits
Joan Fortuny
Régis Lassalle
Katherine Rascher
Gero von Gersdorff
Mathias Schaller
Kenneth J. Rothman
Jetty A. Overbeek
Tania Schink
Marie Linder
Bianca Kollhorst
Lawrence Rasouliyan
Lia Gutierrez
RTI Health Solutions
Research Triangle Institute International (RTI International)
University of Cologne
CIC Bordeaux
Université Bordeaux Segalen - Bordeaux 2-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)
Karolinska Institutet [Stockholm]
PHARMO Institute for Drug Outcomes Research
Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS
Leibniz Association
Aarhus University [Aarhus]
Carl Von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam [Amsterdam] (VU)
CHU Rouen
Normandie Université (NU)
Université de Rouen Normandie (UNIROUEN)
University Hospital Basel [Basel]
Università della Svizzera italiana = University of Italian Switzerland (USI)
Royal Free Hospital [London, UK]
General practice
Epidemiology and Data Science
Source :
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, Wiley, 2021, ⟨10.1002/pds.5319⟩, Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 30(10), 1447-1457. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Intravenous Iron Consortium 2021, ' Use of intravenous iron and risk of anaphylaxis : A multinational observational post-authorisation safety study in Europe ', Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 1447-1457 . https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.5319
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

International audience; PURPOSE: This post-authorisation safety study estimated the risk of anaphylaxis in patients receiving intravenous (IV) iron in Europe, with interest in iron dextran and iron non-dextrans. Studies conducted in the United States have reported risk of anaphylaxis to IV iron ranging from 2.0 to 6.8 per 10 000 first treatments. METHODS: Cohort study of IV iron new users, captured mostly through pharmacy ambulatory dispensing, from populations covered by health and administrative data sources in five European countries from 1999 to 2017. Anaphylaxis events were identified through an algorithm that used parenteral penicillin as a positive control. RESULTS: A total of 304 210 patients with a first IV iron treatment (6367 iron dextran), among whom 13–16 anaphylaxis cases were identified and reported as a range to comply with data protection regulations. The pooled unadjusted incidence proportion (IP) ranged from 0.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2–0.9) to 0.5 (95% CI, 0.3–1.0) per 10 000 first treatments. No events were identified at first dextran treatments. There were 231 294 first penicillin treatments with 30 potential cases of anaphylaxis (IP = 1.2; 95% CI, 0.8–1.7 per 10 000 treatments). CONCLUSION: We found an IP of anaphylaxis from 0.4 to 0.5 per 10 000 first IV iron treatments. The study captured only a fraction of IV iron treatments administered in hospitals, where most first treatments are likely to happen. Due to this limitation, the study could not exclude a differential risk of anaphylaxis between iron dextran and iron non-dextrans. The IP of anaphylaxis in users of penicillin was consistent with incidences reported in the literature.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10538569 and 10991557
Volume :
30
Issue :
10
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....e06c312f47a90c0a8bc0e2ccf6427694