Search

Background and objective Anemia is a common prognosis of chronic kidney disease (CKD). It is predominantly managed with synthetic erythropoietin. The principal objective of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of the use of short-acting erythropoietin with the long-acting one to maintain serum hemoglobin (Hb) concentration within the range of 10.5-12 g/dL. Method This was a retrospective cohort study involving patients diagnosed with stage 5 CKD according to the Saudi Society of Nephrology and Transplantation conducted at eight tertiary care centers in the Tabuk region, Saudi Arabia. We compared the cost-effectiveness of long-acting erythropoietin with the short-acting one. The decision analysis model and Markov model were established to simulate a cohort of 55-year-old patients to estimate the incremental cost and quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) for chronic hemodialysis patients (CHP) treated with either darbepoetin-alfa or epoetin-beta for at least nine months. The incremental cost per QALY was the main outcome marker for using both medications. Serum HB levels were monitored on a monthly basis and costs were calculated. Results A total of 291 CHP met our inclusion criteria; 194 of them were treated with darbepoetin-alfa while 97 were treated with epoetin-beta. The mean age was 56.3 ± 11.2 years for the darbepoetin-alfa group and 55.2 ± 7.8 years for the epoetin-beta cohort. The baseline serum Hb was 10.68 ± 0.98 g/dL for darbepoetin-alfa patients and 11.63 ± 0.32 g/dL for the epoetin-beta group (p=0.003). We observed a significant difference between the percentage of patients successfully treated with epoetin-beta and those managed with darbepoetin-alfa (80.4% vs. 63.92%, p=0.01) with considerably less cardiovascular side effects. The average annual cost per patient was estimated at $919.47 and $12,319.41 for epoetin-beta and darbepoetin-alfa respectively. Also, the average effectiveness was 0.58 for darbepoetin-alfa vs. 0.61 for epoetin-beta. The average cost-effectiveness ratio was $980.25 and $15,023.66 with an incremental cost difference of -$966 in favor of epoetin-beta compared to darbepoetin-alfa. Conclusion Based on our findings, treating anemia in hemodialysis patients using epoetin-beta is very cost-effective compared to managing them with darbepoetin-alfa.

Autoimmune haemolytic anaemia (AIHA) is an uncommon condition characterized by increased destruction of erythrocytes associated with reticulocytosis in the great majority of cases. We present the case of a 68-year-old woman with jaundice and malaise. Investigation revealed AIHA with reticulocytopenia. The patient failed to respond to prednisolone or to rituximab. Azathioprine and epoetin beta were subsequently started, the prednisolone dose was increased, and the patient began to respond after 1 month. In AIHA, reticulocytopenia is a very rare presentation and a sign of great severity and poor outcome. The scarcity of therapeutic options in refractory cases poses a major challenge for physicians. LEARNING POINTS: Autoimmune haemolytic anaemia is a rare disorder characterized by decompensated acquired haemolysis caused by the host’s immune system acting against its own red cell antigens. Concomitant presentation with reticulocytopenia is very rare and a sign of great severity and poor outcome. Treatment options in refractory cases still greatly rely on individual experience and expert opinion.

Background: Anemia is one of the most prevalent complications in patients with chronic kidney disease, which is believed to be caused by the insufficient synthesis of erythropoietin by the kidney. This phase III study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of CinnaPoietin® (epoetin beta, CinnaGen) with Eprex® (epoetin alfa, Janssen Cilag) in the treatment of anemia in ESRD hemodialysis patients. Methods: In this randomized, active-controlled, double-blind, parallel, and non-inferiority trial, patients were randomized to receive either CinnaPoietin® or Eprex® for a 26-week period. The primary endpoints of this study were to assess the mean hemoglobin (Hb) change during the last 4 weeks of treatment from baseline along with the evaluation of the mean weekly epoetin dosage per kilogram of body weight that was necessary to maintain the Hb level within 10–12 g/dL during the last 4 weeks of treatment. As the secondary objective, safety was assessed along with other efficacy endpoints. Results: A total of 156 patients were included in this clinical trial. There was no statistically significant difference between treatment groups regarding the mean Hb change (p = 0.21). In addition, the mean weekly epoetin dosage per kg of body weight for maintaining the Hb level within 10–12 g/dL showed no statistically significant difference between treatment arms (p = 0.63). Moreover, both products had comparable safety profiles. However, the incidence of Hb levels above 13 g/dL was significantly lower in the CinnaPoietin® group. Conclusion: CinnaPoietin® was proved to be non-inferior to Eprex® in the treatment of anemia in ESRD hemodialysis patients. The trial was registered in Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03408639).

Background Reduced quality of life during chemotherapy is often due to fatigue and dyspnea caused by chemotherapy-induced anemia. In breast cancer patients the incidence is estimated to be above 50% and rising during the course of treatment resulting as well in therapy delays. Despite red blood cell transfusion the administration of erythrocyte stimulating factors (ESF) serves as a treatment option. In comparison with conventional chemotherapy intense dose dense regimens have proven to be beneficial in high-risk breast cancer patients, but higher incidences of anemia have been reported. In the GAIN trial two dose dense regimens were evaluated and patients received either Darbepoetin alfa or Epoetin beta. The aim of this subanalysis was to analyse the efficacy and safety of the application of two different ESF during adjuvant chemotherapy for primary node positive breast cancer. Methods Patients were randomly assigned to receive three courses each of epirubicin (E), paclitaxel (T), cyclophosphamide (C) all given at 2-week intervals i.v. (idd ETC-regimen) or ddEC followed by paclitaxel weekly (Tw) plus capecitabine (X)(EC-TX-regimen).All patients received either primary prophylaxis with Epoetin beta (Epo) (450IE/kg weekly) or Darbepoetin alfa (D) (4,5μg/kg biweekly).Allocation happened alternately by date of randomization. Patient outcome (rate of anemia and thromboembolic events, disease free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS)), overall and by regimen were compared according to ESF type applied and in subgroups defined by age. Results 2994 patients were randomized to receive one of the dose dense chemotherapies and of these 1482 patients were given Darbepoetin alfa and 1512 received Epoetin beta. In the trial 84.7% of patients suffered from anemia in the Darbepoetin as well as in the Epoetin group and grade 3/4 anemia was observed in 3.6% vs 3.1% of patients, respectively. In the ETC arm anemia rates, especially grade 3/4 were slightly higher, but there was no significant difference within the treatment arms according to ESF applied (anemia any grade: D 86.1% vs. Epo 87.2%; EC-TX: D 83.2% vs. Epo 82.3%). In the ETC arm anemia was most frequently observed in patients aged 60+ years, but there was no significant difference between the ESF (D 90.5% vs. Epo 89.8%). No significant differences in the incidence of anemia by ESF treatment were observed in various age groups of the EC-TX arm. Thromboembolic events occurred in 9.1% in the Darbepoetin group and in 10.1% of patients treated with Epoetin (p=0.355). Interestingly there were more thromboembolic events in the EC-TX arm compared to the ETC arm (p OS and DFS analyses showed no difference between ESF treatment overall as well as stratified by chemotherapy regimen. Conclusion High risk breast cancer patients treated with two different dose dense chemotherapy schedules have comparable incidences of anemia, thromboembolic events and a similar long term outcome if they receive a preventive treatment with either Darbepoetin alfa or Epoetin beta. The trial is financially supported by Amgen and Roche. Citation Format: van Mackelenbergh M, Loibl S, Jackisch C, Lück H-J, Schneeweiss A, Tesch H, Harbeck N, Schmatloch S, Fehm T, Huober J, Müller V, Bauerfeind I, Untch M, von Minckwitz G, Nekljudova V, Möbus V. Efficacy and safety of darbepoetin alfa or epoetin beta in 2994 high risk early breast cancer patients participating in the German adjuvant intergroup node-positive study (GAIN) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-11-04.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-gene polymorphism is a possible predisposing factor of erythropoietin response under hypoxic conditions. However, it is not completely clear whether the ACE insertion/deletion (I/D) genotype has an impact on anemia in patients with permanent kidney failure. A 9-month prospective trial was conducted on 53 patients on hemodialysis aimed at determining the beneficial effect of oral vs intravenous iron in anemia management with recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEpo), and identifying a possible association of the ACE gene I/D polymorphism with the response to rHuEpo. Patients were randomly allocated to receive 50-100 mg daily of ferrous gluconate orally (N=26) or intravenously every two weeks (N=27), together with rHuEpo-beta (200 IU/kg) subcutaneously, to achieve a hemoglobin increase to 105 g/L; subsequently the rHuEpo dose was adjusted at one or two week intervals. In 34 patients who regularly received ACE-inhibitor (ACEi) medication, genotyping for ACE-gene I/D polymorphism was performed using PCR, gel analysis and appropriate restriction digestion. After prolonged rHuEpo treatment, 24.5% of patients attained the targeted 9 th -month hemoglobin concentration (105 g/L). Of these, 6/26 of patients received elemental iron orally and 7/27 received it intravenously. We observed an association between homozygous DD (deletion) of the ACE gene and a remarkable early increase in blood hemoglobin (p=0.028), erythrocyte count (p=0.020) and hematocrit (p=0.043) after reduction of the dose of rHuEpo (F=3.95; p=0.029), irrespective of the iron repletion mode (p=0.960). This is the first report on DD genotype as a linkage marker for the optimization of rHuEpo dose for anemia management in hemodialysis patients. DOI: 10.2298/ABS160303051S Received: March 3, 2016; Revised: March 31, 2016; Accepted: April 5, 2016; Published online: May 18, 2016 How to cite this article: Savin M, Hadzibulic E, Damjanovic T, Santric V, Stankovic S. Association of I/D angiotensin-converting enzyme genotype with erythropoietin stimulation in kidney failure. Arch Biol Sci. 2017;69(1):15-22.

Background In patients with chronic heart failure and chronic kidney disease, correction of anemia with erythropoietin‐stimulating agents targeting normal hemoglobin levels is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Emerging data suggest a direct effect of erythropoietin on fibroblast growth factor 23 ( FGF 23), elevated levels of which have been associated with adverse outcomes. We investigate effects of erythropoietin‐stimulating agents in patients with both chronic heart failure and chronic kidney disease focusing on FGF 23. Methods and Results In the EPOCARES (Erythropoietin in CardioRenal Syndrome) study, we randomized 56 anemic patients (median age 74 [interquartile range 69–80] years, 66% male) with both chronic heart failure and chronic kidney disease into 3 groups, of which 2 received epoetin beta 50 IU /kg per week for 50 weeks, and the third group served as control. Measurements were performed at baseline and after 2, 26, and 50 weeks. Data were analyzed using linear mixed‐model analysis. After 50 weeks of erythropoietin‐stimulating agent treatment, hematocrit and hemoglobin levels increased. Similarly, C‐terminal FGF 23 levels, in contrast to intact FGF 23 levels, rose significantly due to erythropoietin‐stimulating agents as compared with the controls. During median follow‐up for 5.7 (2.0–5.7) years, baseline C‐terminal FGF 23 levels were independently associated with increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio 2.20; 95% CI , 1.35‐3.59; P =0.002). Conclusions Exogenous erythropoietin increases C‐terminal FGF 23 levels markedly over a period of 50 weeks, elevated levels of which, even at baseline, are significantly associated with an increased risk of mortality. The current results, in a randomized trial setting, underline the strong relationship between erythropoietin and FGF 23 physiology in patients with chronic heart failure and chronic kidney disease. Clinical Trial Registration URL : http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT 00356733.

OBJECTIVES Posttransplant anemia affects 30% to 45% of kidney transplant recipients and is associated with increased morbidity. However, there is lack of evidence about safe hemoglobin levels after erythropoietin treatment. Studies are needed to better understand the potential benefits and risks, as well as to define safe target hemoglobin ranges in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this single-center exploratory, open-label randomized controlled trial, kidney trans-plant recipients with anemia 3 months posttransplant were either treated with epoetin beta to a hemoglobin target level of 11.5 to 13.5 g/dL (n = 28) or given no treatment (n = 27). Treatment effects on graft function and health quality of life were assessed. RESULTS After 2 years, hemoglobin concentrations were significantly higher in the epoetin beta treatment group than in the no treatment group (12.3 ± 0.18 vs 9.99 ± 0.22 g/dL; P < .0001). Estimated glomerular filtration rate, calculated by Modified Diet in Renal Disease 7, declined by 1.7 mL/min (interquartile range, -6 to 4.24) in the epoetin treatment group and by 4.16 mL/min (interquartile range, -12.42 to 2.78) in the no treatment group (P = .32). Rate of progression, determined by estimated glomerular filtration rate slope, was not significantly different between groups (-0.09 ± 0.1 vs -0.12 ± 0.15 mL/min for treated vs not treated; P = .78). Moreover, we observed no significant differences in proteinuria and blood pressure. Treated patients had greater improvements in the vitality and mental health domains of the Medical Outcomes Short Form Health Survey quality of life scores. CONCLUSIONS Treatment of anemia in kidney transplant recipients to a hemoglobin level of 11.5 to 13.5 g/dL with erythropoietin improves some quality of life scores. The treatment was safe and not associated with adverse outcomes. There were no changes in rate of decline of graft function.

This multicenter study was designed to assess the hemoglobin (Hb) stability and conversion ratio of the switch from epoetin beta to darbepoetin alfa in Taiwanese hemodialysis (HD) patients. A total of 135 HD patients were enrolled and randomized with intravenous darbepoetin alfa or epoetin beta. The study duration was 24 weeks. Equivalent doses and conversion ratios were assessed with respect to Hb stratification: low Hb (≥8.0 g/dL to ≤10.0 g/dL) and high Hb (>10.0 g/dL to ≤11.0 g/dL). The results showed stable Hb levels in the study period. At week 24, the conversion ratio was higher for high Hb than low Hb (296.4 IU/dose epoetin beta: 1 µg/dose darbepoetin alfa. vs. 277.2 IU/dose epoetin beta: 1 µg/dose darbepoetin alfa). In conclusion, the conversion ratio in the present study was higher than 1 µg: 200 IU for darbepoetin alfa: epoetin for treating anemia in Taiwanese HD patients.

Background: Early anemia of prematurity (EAP) is a serious issue of contemporary neonatology due to increasing survivability of premature infants. One of the most efficient preventive methods is extreme prematurity prevention. At the same time, efficacy of different methods of EAP therapy remains undetermined. Objective: Our aim was to compare efficacy of erythrocyte-containing donor blood components (packed red cells, erythrocytic suspension) and recombinant epoetin beta for treating premature infants with EAP. Methods: The retrospective cohort study provided analysis of data of premature infants (gestation age — 27–32 weeks) born with very low (VLBW) and extremely low birth weight (ELBW) and EAP (hemoglobin < 110 g/l, hematocrit < 27%, reticulocyte share < 20‰, normochromia, normocytosis; all criteria must have been met). We determined primary hematological morphological parameters and population structure of umbilical (at birth) and peripheral blood (after 30 days of treatment) leukocytes. Results: 32 premature infants with EAP underwent donor blood component transfusions, 26 — recombinant epoetin beta injections. The groups were comparable in terms of the primary clinical laboratory parameters. In the donor blood component group, we observed lower hemoglobin concentration (108 ± 17 vs. 119 ± 16 g/l in the epoetin beta group; p = 0.07) and reticulocyte share (3.7 ± 1.5 vs. 8.7 ± 1.7‰, respectively; p = 0,053) at the age of 1 month. We revealed a drop in cell immunity parameters in the setting of donor blood component transfusions: CD4+ lymphocyte share — down to 32,2 ± 14,0% (in the epoetin beta group; p = 0.055); CD8+ lymphocyte share — down to 21,2 ± 7,1% (in the epoetin beta group; p = 0.050). Conclusion: Epoetin beta is more efficient in terms of EAP correction in premature infants with VLBW and ELBW that erythrocyte-containing donor blood component transfusions. The latter are characterized by adverse effect on cell immunity parameters.

Background There is limited data showing that early treatment for anemia could prolong renal survival in non-dialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. We therefore investigated the relationship between hemoglobin (Hb) levels at initiation of epoetin beta therapy and renal outcome in non-dialysis CKD patients with anemia. Methods In this prospective, multi-center, observational study, non-dialysis CKD patients with anemia who were naïve to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) were divided into three groups based on their Hb levels at initiation of epoetin beta therapy (Group I: 10 ≤ Hb

Background: Clinicians providing dialysis care have numerous erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) available for treating anemia. We sought to provide a contemporary description of ESA types used in hemodialysis (HD) settings in nine European countries. Methods: Our study uses Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study phase 5 (2012–2015) data from nine European countries (Belgium, France, ­Germany, Italy, Russia, Spain, Sweden, Turkey, and the United Kingdom). A total of 164 facilities and 3,281 patients contributed cross-sectional data. ESA types captured included short-acting epoetins (e.g., epoetin alfa, beta, etc., including biosimilars), darbepoetin alfa, and continuous erythropoietin receptor agonist (CERA; methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta). Results: We observed broad variability across countries in prescription of ESA types: prescription of epoetin alfa or epoetin beta ranged from 22% (France) to 78% (Russia), darbepoetin alfa prescription ranged from 13% (Russia) to 53% (UK), and CERA prescription ranged from Conclusion: A variety of short- and long-acting ESAs are commonly used in European HD facilities to maintain hemoglobin at remarkably similar levels with each ESA type. The availability of numerous ESA options for managing anemia has allowed European providers to optimize anemia management according to the particular circumstances of each patient.

The article describes the ways to cost optimization of anemia treatment CKD - HD patients. Aims. dinical and economic analysis treatment of Anemia CKD VHD PTS with using long action Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents (ESA). Methods. We calculated the true cost of anemia therapy with darbepoetin alfa compared to the methoxypolyethyleneglycol - epoetin beta. Results. It was established that average cost of therapy with methoxypolyethyleneglycol - epoetin beta was lower than darbepoetin alfa provided declared, wholesale or retail prices of25 - 60%. Conclusions. The methoxypolyethyleneglycol - epoetin beta haspharmacoeconomics advantages in comparison with the darbepoetin alfa in treatment of anemia CKD V HD patients.

Renal anemia is caused by the deficiency of endogenous erythropoietin (Epo) due to renal dysfunction. We think that it is possible to slow the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in case we initiate Epo early in pre-dialysis patients, especially in the non-diabetic population. Erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) treatments targeting mild anemia (10-12 g/dl) can decrease the risk of occurrence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with hypertension, diabetes mellitus and congestive heart failure. As the large randomized controlled trials such as Cardiovascular Risk Reduction by Early Anemia Treatment with Epoetin Beta, Correction of Hemoglobin and Outcomes in Renal Insufficiency and Trial to Reduce Cardiovascular Events with Aranesp Thearpy in the Western countries suggested, we do not recommend high doses of ESA to achieve the target hemoglobin (Hb) level. The target Hb of >13 g/dl might lead to increase in the risk of CVD although maintaining a high Hb of >12 g/dl without ESA is not harmful for CKD patients. It is desirable to determine the target Hb in dialysis patients depending on their ages. Renal anemia should be monitored constantly to start ESA and iron replacement therapy at an appropriate time, while avoiding their excess in order to minimize the occurrence of CVD and other complications. Taken all the international guidelines and our clinical experiences together, we should consider administration of ESA when the Hb level becomes

Background and objectives The study was conducted to identify a conversion factor for switching from previous erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) to continuous erythropoietin receptor activator–methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta (C.E.R.A.) and to document the efficacy and long-term safety of C.E.R.A. in pediatric patients with anemia of CKD undergoing hemodialysis. Design, setting, participants, & measurements In this open-label, multicenter study, patients aged 6–17 years, with stable chronic anemia of CKD, undergoing hemodialysis received C.E.R.A. every 4 weeks, at a starting dose determined by previous weekly epoetin alfa/beta or darbepoetin dosing. After a 16-week dose-titration and a 4-week evaluation period, patients with stable hemoglobin could enter a 1-year optional safety extension. Results A total of 64 patients were enrolled. A conversion factor (4 µg every 4 weeks for each weekly dose of 125 IU epoetin alfa/beta or 0.55 µg darbepoetin) was identified that allowed patients to maintain hemoglobin within target levels on switching to C.E.R.A. from another ESA. Using this conversion factor, the adjusted mean change in hemoglobin from baseline to evaluation was −0.09 g/dl (95% confidence interval, −0.45 to 0.26); 81% of patients maintained hemoglobin within 10.0–12.0 g/dl and 75% maintained hemoglobin within 1.0 g/dl of baseline. Results were consistent across age groups (6–11 and 12–17 years) and previous ESA. Thirty-seven patients entered the safety extension period and 17 completed 73 weeks of treatment. Most withdrawals were for kidney transplantation. A total of 70% of patients had hemoglobin within 10.0–12.0 g/dl at last observation, and 62% were within ±1.0 g/dl of baseline. Safety was similar to studies in adult patients, with no new signal detected. Conclusions Using a defined conversion factor, 4-weekly C.E.R.A. was efficacious in maintaining hemoglobin levels in pediatric patients with stable anemia of CKD undergoing hemodialysis, switching from maintenance treatment with epoetin alfa/beta or darbepoetin. Safety was consistent with the known C.E.R.A. safety profile in adults.

The effect of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) on dialysis initiation in advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients is not clear. We retrospectively analyzed the outcome of dialysis initiation in a stage 5 CKD cohort with ESA reimbursement limited to the maximal standardized monthly ESA dose equivalent to epoetin beta 20,000 U by the National Health Insurance program. Totally 423 patients were followed up for a median of 1.37 year. A time-dependent Cox regression model, adjusted for monthly levels of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and hemoglobin, was constructed to investigate the association between ESA and outcome. The standardized monthly ESA dose in ESA users was 16,000 ± 3,900 U of epoetin beta. Annual changes of hemoglobin were −0.29 ± 2.19 and −0.99 ± 2.46 g/dL in ESA users and ESA non-users, respectively (P = 0.038). However, annual eGFR decline rates were not different between ESA users and non-users. After adjustment, ESA use was associated with deferred dialysis initiation (hazard ratio 0.63, 95% confidence interval 0.42–0.93, P = 0.021). The protective effect remained when the monthly ESA doses were incorporated. Our data showed that restricted use of ESA was safe and associated with deferred dialysis initiation in stage 5 CKD patients.

Epoetin beta pegol is a continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (CERA) with a long half-life. Although CERA has been shown to maintain adequate hemoglobin (Hb) levels at prolonged dosing intervals, the optimal dosing schedule remains unclear. We therefore compared the efficacy of maintaining hemoglobin levels with administration of twice-monthly CERA (TWICE) versus once-monthly CERA (ONCE). Twenty hemodialysis patients receiving epoetin beta (EPO) were enrolled in this crossover study. Patients were assigned to either the TWICE or the ONCE group based on matching Hb levels and EPO doses. After 6 months of treatment, the CERA dosage was interchanged between the groups and the study was continued for an additional 6 months. The effect of the different regimens on iron metabolism was also assessed during the first 6 months of the study. Hb levels significantly increased in the TWICE group, allowing for a reduction in CERA dosage, while the dose of CERA required to maintain Hb levels in the ONCE group remained unchanged. After the interchange, a decrease in Hb levels with incremental increase in CERA dosage was observed in the TWICE→ONCE group, with the opposite effect observed in the ONCE→TWICE group. Although increases in ferritin and hepcidin-25 levels in the ONCE group were noted at one month, they disappeared at 6 months. Although Hb levels were maintained in both the ONCE and TWICE groups, a twice-monthly administration was advantageous, as it required a lower dose of CERA.

Introduction There is scant real-world information on switching treatment for anemia associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) from methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta (PEG-Epo) to darbepoetin alfa (DA). TRANSFORM was a multi-center, observational study designed to describe the time course of hemoglobin (Hb) concentration (primary outcome measure) and other parameters of clinical management of anemia in European hemodialysis patients in clinical practice before and after a switch from PEG-Epo to DA. Methods Eligible subjects were adult patients with CKD dialyzed at European dialysis centers for ≥26 weeks and treated with PEG-Epo for ≥14 weeks immediately prior to being switched to DA and no earlier than January 2011. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent doses and Hb values were recorded for the 14-week pre-switch and 26-week post-switch periods. Results Of the 1,027 eligible patients enrolled at 42 hemodialysis centers in 7 European countries, 785 were included in analyses. Mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) Hb was generally stable: 11.19 (11.11, 11.26), 11.48 (11.40, 11.57), and 11.29 (11.20, 11.37) g/dL at month −1 pre-switch and months 3 and 6 post-switch, respectively. The geometric mean (95% CI) PEG-Epo dose at month −1 was 27.4 (26.0, 28.8) µg/week; DA dose was 29.4 (27.9, 30.9), 23.3 (21.9, 24.9), and 25.6 (24.1, 27.1) µg/week at months 1, 4, and 6, respectively. The geometric mean (95% CI) dose ratio at switching was 1.06 (1.01, 1.11). When stratifying by dose-ratio categories 1.2 at switching, mean DA dose and Hb converged within narrow ranges by month 6 post-switch: 23.9–27.0 µg/week and 11.1–11.5 g/dL, respectively. Hb excursions

Although erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are effective at treating anemia, the association between hemoglobin (Hb) levels and survival is still unclear, especially for the incident Japanese hemodialysis (HD) population. The Japan Erythropoietin Treatment (JET) Study is an open multi-center, prospective, observational study designed to evaluate the relationship between the maintenance of Hb levels and new HD patient prognosis after the first administration of epoetin beta. Landmark analyses were performed to examine the relationship between Hb levels at 6 months and survival. Among a total of 10,310 patients, 6631 completed the initial 6 months of epoetin beta treatment (induction phase) and were followed up for a further 2.5 years (maintenance phase). Three-year survival rate of patients with

Inadequate iron availability limits the response to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) and hepcidin is a key regulator of iron metabolism. However, there is little information concerning time-dependent changes in hepcidin in response to the change of accelerated iron demand due to ESA-induced erythropoiesis. In this study, iron-related parameters, including hepcidin levels, were explored in comparison to patients receiving continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (CERA) and epoetin beta (EPO) treatment. Ninety-four patients were randomized to receive monthly CERA (N = 47) or EPO three times/week (N = 47). After the titration period, hemoglobin levels and iron-related parameters were examined. Data for 71 patients were evaluated (CERA, N = 34; EPO, N = 37). Compared with EPO treatment, CERA treatment caused significant decreases within 1 week in hepcidin (-93.5 ± 46.9 vs. -1.3 ± 38.3 ng/mL, P < 0.01), reticulocyte hemoglobin equivalent (Ret-He) (-4.03 ± 2.64 vs. -1.13 ± 1.41 pg, P < 0.01), ferritin (-58.9 ± 30.5 vs. -12.2 ± 23.8 ng/mL, P < 0.01) and transferrin saturation (-13.2 ± 9.1 vs. 1.0 ± 11.9%, P < 0.01) and significant increases within 2 weeks in the levels of hemoglobin (0.42 ± 0.38 vs. -0.02 ± 0.48 g/dL, P < 0.01). In conclusion, hepcidin, Ret-He, ferritin and transferrin saturation levels decreased within 1 week and hemoglobin increased within 2 weeks after CERA administration. Time course of iron-related parameters including hepcidin demonstrated accelerated iron utilization appropriately according to ESA-induced erythropoiesis.

In a multicenter, prospective, observational study of 279 kidney transplant recipients with anemia, the efficacy and safety of once-monthly continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (C.E.R.A.) were assessed to a maximum of 15 months. The main efficacy variable was the proportion of patients achieving a hemoglobin level of 11-12 g/dL at each of visits between months 7 and 9. At study entry, 224 patients (80.3%) were receiving erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) therapy including darbepoetin alfa (98), epoetin beta (61), and C.E.R.A. (45). The mean (SD) time between C.E.R.A. applications was 34.0 (11.9) days. Among 193 patients for whom efficacy data were available, mean (SD) hemoglobin was 11.1 (0.99) g/dL at study entry, 11.5 (1.1) g/dL at month 7, 11.6 (1.3) g/dL at month 9, and 11.4 (1.1) g/dL at month 15. During months 7–9, 20.7% of patients had all hemoglobin values within the range 11-12 g/dL and 64.8% were within 10–13 g/dL. Seven patients (2.5%) discontinued C.E.R.A. due to adverse events or serious adverse events. In this observational trial under real-life conditions, once-monthly C.E.R.A. therapy achieved stable hemoglobin levels in stable kidney transplant recipients with good tolerability, and with no requirement for any dose change in 43% of patients.

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are standard therapy for chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with renal anemia. However, few studies have compared the effects of different ESAs on anemia in identical pre-dialysis CKD patients.Seventy-nine patients who switched from epoetin beta to darbepoetin alfa (Group 1), and 82 patients who switched from darbepoetin alfa to epoetin beta pegol (Group 2) were enrolled in this study. Clinical and laboratory parameters were assessed for 6 months before and after switching ESAs. The prevalence of adverse events, the dose conversion ratio of ESAs, and the frequency of ESA administration were also analyzed.Analysis of variance showed that switching ESAs did not significantly change hemoglobin levels for the study duration in both groups (mean hemoglobin 10.3-10.5 g/dL in Group 1 and 10.4-10.7 g/dL in Group 2). Estimated glomerular filtration rate, blood pressure, transferrin saturation, ferritin, and albumin remained constant in both groups. The prevalence of adverse effects was quite low (0-3.8 %) during both 6-month study periods. The mean dose conversion ratio for epoetin beta:darbepoetin alfa was 163.7 units:1 μg and for darbepoetin alfa:epoetin beta pegol was 1.08 μg:1 μg. The intervals of ESA administration significantly differed (epoetin beta pegoldarbepoetin alfaepoetin beta).Epoetin beta, darbepoetin alfa, and epoetin beta pegol are effective and well-tolerated agents for managing anemia in Japanese pre-dialysis CKD patients. The intervals of ESA administration to maintain a patient's target hemoglobin were longer in the order of epoetin beta pegoldarbepoetin alfaepoetin beta.

The impact of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in chemotherapy-induced anemia has been a constant topic of debate over recent years. We prospectively assessed the efficacy of epoetin beta (Epo-b) in improving hemoglobin (Hb) levels and outcome in patients within an open label, randomized clinical phase II trial with advanced or metastatic gastric/esophagogastric cancer.Previously untreated patients were randomized to receive 3-weekly cycles of capecitabine (1000 mg/m(2) bid) for 14 days plus on day 1 either irinotecan 250 mg/m(2) or cisplatin 80 mg/m(2). Epo-b (30000 IU once weekly) was initiated in patients with Hb11 g/dl and continued until Hb ≥12 g/dl was reached. If after 4 weeks the Hb increase was0.5 g/dl, Epo-b was increased to 30000 IU, twice weekly.Of 118 patients enrolled, 32 received Epo-b treatment; of these, 65 % achieved an increase in Hb levels of at least 2 g/dl, with 74 % achieving the target Hb of ≥12 g/dl. Within the study population, patients receiving Epo-b showed better overall survival (median 14.5 vs. 8.0 months, P = 0.056) as well as a significantly improved disease control rate (78 vs. 55 %, P = 0.025). Patients in the irinotecan group profited significantly (P0.05) in terms of progression-free survival and overall survival under Epo-b treatment (median 6.5 vs 4.1 months and median 15.4 vs 8.4 months, respectively).Epo-b was effective in raising Hb levels in patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer. Patients receiving Epo-b had a significantly increased response to chemotherapy and a clear trend to improved survival.

Erythropoiesis‐stimulating agents (ESA) reduce the need for transfusions and improve the quality of life in patients receiving chemotherapy, but several clinical trials have suggested that ESA might have a negative impact on survival. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ESA, epoetin beta and darbepoetin alfa, including their impact on overall survival and thromboembolic events, we conducted an individual data‐based meta‐analysis of three randomized, placebo‐controlled trials studying Japanese patients with chemotherapy‐induced anemia. All trials were conducted in compliance with Good Clinical Practice. A total of 511 patients with solid tumor or lymphoma (epoetin beta or darbepoetin alfa, n = 273; placebo, n = 238) were included. The ESA significantly reduced the risk of transfusion (relative risk, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.29–0.76). No significant effect of the ESA on overall survival was observed (unadjusted hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.75–1.34). A prespecified subgroup analysis showed no strong interaction between the baseline hemoglobin concentration and the effect of ESA on overall survival. Among the ESA‐treated patients, the highest hemoglobin achieved during the treatment period in each patient had no impact on mortality. No increase in thromboembolic events was observed in the ESA‐treated patients (0.7% vs 1.7% placebo). The ESA reduced the risk of transfusion without a negative impact on the survival of patients with chemotherapy‐induced anemia.

Anti-erythropoietin (anti-EPO) antibody-related pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) is a rare but serious complication that can occur during the administration of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. Treatment with the calcineurin inhibitor cyclosporine has shown benefits in patients with anti-EPO PRCA. The efficacy of tacrolimus, another calcineurin inhibitor, in patients with anti-EPO PRCA has not been determined. The present report is the first our knowledge to describe the successful treatment of a patient with anti-EPO PRCA using tacrolimus. A 73-year-old man was markedly anemic 8 months after starting epoetin beta treatment. He was diagnosed with anti-EPO PRCA. Cyclosporine was started, but he experienced side effects. He was switched from cyclosporine to tacrolimus. No side effects were observed, and his anti-EPO PRCA was improved 6 months later, despite the persistence of anti-EPO antibodies. Tacrolimus was continued until the disappearance of the antibodies. Following the cessation of tacrolimus, PRCA did not relapse. Antibody remained detectable at the time of clinical remission, indicating that immunosuppressive therapy should be continued while monitoring the antibody titer. When the antibody titer decreases to the negative range, cessation of the immunosuppressive therapy does not result in disease relapse.

Background: We investigated the efficacy, safety and tolerability of once-monthly administration of C.E.R.A. in erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) naive predialysis patients with CKD for anemia treatment, Study Design: Single arm, open label study., Methods: A total of 75 patients (mean (SD) age was 52.8 (16.4) years, 76.0% were female) were included in this study conducted between 12 August 2008 and 30 October 2009 in 9 centers across Turkey. The mean change in Hb concentration (g/dL) between baseline (week 0) and the efficacy evaluation period (EEP) was the primary efficacy parameter evaluated in three consecutive periods including a dose titration period (DTP; with initial 1.2 mu g/kg dose of C.E.R.A., subcutaneously, 28 weeks), EEP (8 weeks) and a long-term safety period (16 weeks)., Results: Our analysis revealed an improvement in Hb levels from baseline value of 9.4 (0.4) g/dL to time adjusted average level of 11.4 (0.7) g/dL in EEP in the per protocol (PP) population and from 9.3 (0.5) g/dL to 11.1 (1.0) g/dL in intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Mean (SD) change in Hb levels from baseline to EEP was 2.0 (0.7) g/dl in the PP population (primary endpoint) and 1.7 (1.1) g/dL in the ITT population. The percentage of patients whose Hb concentrations remained within the target range of 10.0-12.0 g/dL throughout the EEP was 43.9% (95% CI: 28.5-60.3%) in the PP population and 38.7% (95% CI: 27.6% to 50.6%) in the ITP population. A total of 206 adverse events (AE) were reported in 77.0% of patients with hypertension (20%) as the most frequent AE., Conclusion: Once-monthly subcutaneous C.E.R.A. administration is effective and safe in the treatment of anemia in pre-dialysis patients with CKD, who are not currently treated with ESAs.

To compare the efficacy and safety of epoetin theta and epoetin beta in anemic patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) not yet receiving dialysis and previously on stable maintenance therapy with epoetin beta.In this multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blind, non-inferiority study, 288 patients were treated subcutaneously (s.c.) for 24 weeks with epoetin theta (n = 193) or epoetin beta (n = 95). The primary efficacy endpoint was change in hemoglobin (Hb) from a 2-week baseline period to end of treatment (12-week efficacy evaluation period [EEP], weeks 15-26). The non-inferiority limit was 1.0 g/dL (2-sided alpha = 0.05). Weekly doses of epoetin required to maintain Hb levels, dose changes, safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity were also evaluated.EudraCT No. 2005-000142-37.Mean Hb values were comparable in both groups at baseline and during the 24-week treatment period. The estimated treatment difference between groups from baseline to EEP was 0.01 g/dL (95% confidence interval: -0.20, 0.22; p = 0.9207 (ANCOVA)), indicating that epoetin theta was non-inferior to epoetin beta. The weekly doses of epoetin theta or epoetin beta were nearly the same and the change from baseline to EEP in patients who switched to epoetin theta (36.6 to 30.0 IU/kg(BW)) was comparable to those continuing epoetin beta therapy (37.7 to 28.3 IU/kg(BW)). The profile and the frequency of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were comparable in both groups (17.1% epoetin theta; 14.7% epoetin beta). The most common ADR was hypertension. No patient developed anti-erythropoietin antibodies.Epoetin theta (s.c.) has efficacy comparable with epoetin beta (s.c.) in pre-dialysis patients with renal anemia based on Hb changes from baseline to end of treatment (non-inferiority). The safety profile was also comparable. Patients could be switched from maintenance treatment with epoetin beta to epoetin theta without relevant dose changes.

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are approved to treat anemia in patients with non-myeloid malignancies receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. ESAs reduce transfusion rates, but some clinical studies suggest that ESAs may reduce survival or increase disease progression. This study-level meta-analysis examined the effects of darbepoetin alfa, epoetin alfa or epoetin beta on mortality, disease progression and transfusion incidence in patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies, using randomized, controlled trials of patients receiving chemotherapy and ESAs or standard of care. The odds ratio (OR) for mortality was 1.04 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81–1.34, random-effects model, 10 studies); the risk difference was − 0.01 (95% CI, − 0.03–0.02). The OR for disease progression was 1.02 (95% CI 0.81–1.30, random-effects model, five studies). A lower proportion of ESA-treated patients than controls received transfusions (seven studies). In this meta-analysis, ESAs reduced transfusions with no clear effect on mortality or disease progression in patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies receiving chemotherapy.

Recombinant human erythropoietin (epoetin) has been available for the treatment of renal anemia for more than 20 years, and within the last decade two molecularly engineered analogues darbepoetin alfa and pegylated epoetin beta were introduced as longer-acting erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. Recently, newer strategies for correcting anemia have been explored, some of which remain in the laboratory while others are translating across into clinical trials. Peginesatide has completed phase 3 clinical trials for the treatment of anemia associated with chronic kidney disease; this molecule is immunologically distinct from the erythropoietic proteins, with no cross-reactivity with anti-erythropoietin antibodies. HIF (hypoxia inducible factor) stabilization involves the pharmacologic inhibition of prolyl hydroxylation of HIF-α (the major transcription factor controlling erythropoietin gene expression), thereby preventing its degradation in the proteasome. Hepcidin is the master regulator of iron metabolism, and this peptide is upregulated in inflammatory conditions, including uremia; its antagonism has been shown to cause amelioration of inflammatory anemia in animal models. For the time being, erythropoiesis-stimulating agent therapy remains the mainstay of anemia management in chronic kidney disease, but it is possible that one or more of the strategies discussed in this review may have a future role in the treatment of this condition.

SummaryErythropoietin improves myocardial function and enhances re-endothelialisation. Aim of this study was to analyse progenitor cell mobilisation and restenosis in patients from the Regeneration of Vital Myocardium in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction by Erythropoietin (REVIVAL-3) study. Patients with STEMI undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were randomly assigned to Epoetin beta (EPO) (n=68) or placebo (n=70). Drug-eluting stents (DES) were utilised in 93% of patients receiving EPO and in 95% of patients receiving placebo (p=0.83). Serial venous blood samples were drawn; CD133+ progenitor cells were quantified by four-colour flow cytometry and cytokines interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 and tumour necrosis factor (TNF) alpha were analysed by cytometric bead array. Fortyeight hours after PCI a significant increase in CD133+ progenitor cells was observed in the EPO group. Yet, no differences in plasma cytokines were found. Quantitative coronary angiography after six months revealed an increase in segment diameter stenosis in the EPO group (32 ± 19% vs. 26 ± 14%, p=0.046). However, this increase in neointima generation was not associated with progenitor cell mobilisation. EPO in patients with STEMI treated with PCI is associated with an increase in diameter stenosis that is not associated with circulating progenitor cells.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00390832

Patient group It is estimated that 15–30% of geriatric cats will develop chronic kidney disease (CKD), and that 30–65% of these cats will develop anemia as their renal disease worsens. Anemia of renal disease is multifactorial in its pathogenesis, but the main cause is reduced production of erythropoietin, a renal hormone that controls the bone marrow's production of red blood cells, as kidney disease progresses. Practical relevance It is important to recognize the presence of anemia of renal disease so that adequate treatment may be instituted to improve quality of life and metabolic function. Erythrocyte-stimulating agents (ESAs), such as epoetin alfa, epoetin beta and darbepoetin alfa, have been developed to counteract the effects of decreased erythropoietin production by the kidneys. These treatments, which are the focus of this review, have 83% similarity in amino acid sequence to the feline hormone. On average, the target packed cell volume (>25%) is reached within 3–4 weeks of ESA therapy. Clinical challenges The use of ESAs has been associated with a number of complications, such as iron deficiency, hypertension, arthralgia, fever, seizures, polycythemia and pure red cell aplasia (PRCA). Darbepoetin has a prolonged half-life compared with epoetin and thus can be given only once a week, instead of three times a week. The incidence of PRCA appears to be decreased with darbepoetin use when compared with epoetin use in cats. Evidence base There is limited published evidence to date to underpin the use of ESAs in cats. This review draws on the relevant publications that currently exist, and the authors’ personal experience of using these therapies for over 5 years.

The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence and efficacy of renal anemia treated with epoetin in maintenance kidney transplant recipients in Slovenia. By the end of 2009, 107 out of 537 patients (19.9%) had been treated with epoetin. A cohort of 49 patients (45.8%) were analyzed in detail: 11 patients received epoetin alpha, 18 epoetin beta, 10 darbepoetin alpha, and 10 patients received methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta. The median epoetin dose was 0.36 µg/kg body weight per week. The median serum laboratory parameters were as follows: hemoglobin 120 g/L, hematocrit 0.36, ferritin 332 ng/mL, transferrin saturation 34%, serum creatinine 145 µmol/L, serum albumin 41 g/L, intact parathyroid hormone 79 ng/L, and C-reactive protein 3 mg/L. We concluded that the prevalence of renal anemia in kidney transplant recipients treated with epoetin was approximately 20%, and laboratory parameters suggested that the treatment of renal anemia in this study cohort was optimal.

Background: Anemia is the most frequent cytopenia in Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS). Epoetin alfa, Epoetin beta and Darbepoetin alfa (ESA) have been investigated in several studies as useful to treat anemia in this category of patients. Available preclinical data support oxidative stress and hemolysis contributing to ESA resistance but not clinical data is today available. G6PD deficiency is an X-linked condition characterized by a markedly reduced capability to protect red blood cells from oxidative stresses. In the island of Sardinia the prevalence is reported to be as high as 12%. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all MDS patients who had received ESA in our centre. Diagnosis of MDS was made according to WHO criteria. Patients were stratified based on International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS). At diagnosis baseline EPO level and G6PD quantitative estimation were detected. G6PD deficiency was defined as an enzyme dosage of less than 0.96 UI/g of Hb in the peripheral blood. Red blood cell (RBC) transfusions requirement before starting treatment was evaluated. Erythroid hematologic improvement (HI-E) was evaluated according to the International Working Group (IWG) response criteria ( Cheson et al JCO 2006). Results: Thirty patients met the above specified criteria. Table 1 showed patients’ characteristics. Of them 7 were G6PD-defiecient and 23 had normal G6PD level values. Twenty four patients (80%) achieved an HI-E (14 major and 10 minor). In the G6PD-deficient group HI-E was observed in 7 over 7 patients ( major in 4 and minor in 3). In the control group HI-E was observed in 17 over 23 patients (major in 10 minor in 7). (P= 0.29). Conclusions: We evaluated 30 MDS lowrisk and Int I IPSS patients who received ESA in the last 20 years in our centre. Despite the common belief that oxidative stress and hemolysis may contribute to ESA resistance, no statistically significant difference to potentially resistance to ESA treatment in G6PD deficiency have been observed. We conclude that G6PD-deficiency does not contraindicate the use of ESA in this setting of patients.

This study assessed plasma N-terminal prohormone brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) as a prognostic marker of cardiovascular risk in patients with chronic kidney disease stages 3-4 and anaemia treated with epoetin beta to two haemoglobin target ranges.Of 603 patients enrolled in the Cardiovascular Risk Reduction by Early Anaemia Treatment with Epoetin Beta (CREATE) trial (baseline creatinine clearance 15-35 mL/min; haemoglobin 11.0-12.5 g/dL), 291 were included in this sub-study. Patients received subcutaneous epoetin beta either immediately after randomisation (target 13.0-15.0 g/dL; Group 1), or after their haemoglobin levels had fallen10.5 g/dL (target 10.5-11.5 g/dL; Group 2). Chronic heart failure New York Heart Association class III-IV was an exclusion criterion. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00321919)Cardiovascular event rates were higher in patients with baseline NT-proBNP400 vs. ≤ 400 pg/mL (39 vs. 13 events; p = 0.0002). Dialysis was initiated in 68 vs. 42 patients with NT-proBNP400 vs. ≤ 400 pg/mL (p = 0.0003). Amongst patients with NT-proBNP400 pg/mL, there was no significant difference between treatment groups in risk of cardiovascular events (HR = 0.57; p = 0.08) or time to dialysis (HR = 0.65; p = 0.08). The overall interpretation of this substudy is, however, limited by its relatively small sample size which, together with low clinical event rates, result in a lack of statistical power for some analyses and should be viewed as being hypothesis-generating in nature.In chronic kidney disease patients with mild-to-moderate anaemia, elevated baseline plasma NT-proBNP levels are associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular events and an accelerated progression towards end-stage renal disease.

INTRODUCTION: Recombinant human erythropoietin (r-HuEPO) is used to treat symptomatic anaemia due to chemotherapy. A new r-HuEPO, Epoetin theta (Eporatio®), was investigated and compared to placebo and Epoetin beta in a randomised, double-blind clinical trial in adult cancer patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy, using a fixed weekly starting dose of 20,000 IU Epoetin theta. The primary efficacy endpoint was the responder rate (complete Hb response, Hb increase ≥ 2 g/dL). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: 223 patients were randomised to s.c. treatment for 12 weeks with either Epoetin theta (n = 76) once per week, Epoetin beta (n = 73) three times per week or placebo (n = 74). The starting dose was 20,000 IU once weekly Epoetin theta or 450 IU/kg(BW) per week Epoetin beta administered in 3 equal weekly doses. RESULTS: In the Epoetin theta group were significantly more responders than in the placebo group (65.8 vs. 20.3%, P < 0.0001). Epoetin beta was also more effective than placebo (71.2 vs. 20.3%, P < 0.0001). The mean weekly dose at the time of complete Hb response was lower in the Epoetin theta group (30,000 IU) than in the Epoetin beta group (42,230 IU). Epoetin theta was clearly more effective than placebo. CONCLUSION: This small study showed, that Epoetin theta is a safe and effective treatment of symptomatic anaemia due to platinum-based chemotherapy in cancer patients.

An elderly patient with pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) with antierythropoietin (anti-EPO) antibodies is described. PRCA due to alloimmunization is a rare and severe complication of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHu-EPO) therapy. Most reported patients with PRCA were cured primarily by immunosuppressive drug therapy. The patient in this case, however, did not want to receive any immunosuppressive drugs. Therefore, rHu-EPO injection was simply discontinued, the severe anemia gradually improved, and the hemoglobin approached normal range. This case is very rare and significant in that there have been few such elderly patients with rHu-EPO-induced PRCA in whom PRCA remission was achieved, with decreasing antibody titers, after cessation of rHu-EPO alone. Further cases are needed to assess how PRCA should be treated in patients with anti-EPO antibodies.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of epoetin-beta on anemia and sustained viral response in patients with chronic hepatitis C receiving treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin. Forty-two Caucasian patients with chronic hepatitis C infection, treated with pegylated interferon alpha-2a or alpha-2b plus ribavirin, who experienced at least a 2 log decline in HCV-RNA in the first month of therapy and a > or =2.5 g/dl hemoglobin drop from baseline, were recruited. They were divided into two groups: 22 patients received epoetin-beta 30,000 U administered s.c. q.w. (group A) and 20 patients received a reduced ribavirin dose of 600 mg daily (group B). The end-of-treatment response was 95.4% (21/22) in group A and 80% (16/20) (P = 0.2) in group B. Sustained viral response in group A was 81.8% (18/22), statistically higher than in group B (45%, 9/20) (P = 0.03). Mean corpuscular volume of erythrocytes was statistically lower in group A than in group B 4 weeks after starting epoetin-beta or reduced ribavirin dose (P < 0.001), end-of-treatment (P < 0.001) and after 6 months follow-up (P < 0.001). A negative correlation between the levels of ferritin serum was found in group A at the baseline and mean corpuscular volume value after 1 month of combination antiviral therapy (r = -0.45; P = 0.35), 4 weeks after starting epoetin-beta (r = -0.43; P = 0.04) and after 6 months follow-up (r = -0.45; P = 0.03). Administration of epoetin-beta increases sustained viral response rates among patients developing anemia, because the standard dose of ribavirin is maintained, thereby reducing the side-effects of antiviral treatment.

Anemia is common during anticancer treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the response and safety of treatment with epoetin-beta (EB) in patients with neoadjuvant therapy prior to primary digestive tract tumor surgery. In this open-label, single-arm study, patients (n = 22) with hemoglobin (Hb) levels below 11 g/dl who received epoetin-beta 450 IU/kg (30,000 IU) weekly until the hemoglobin level reached 12 g/dl. After treatment with EB, a mean absolute increment of 2.6 g/dl was attained. The mean hemoglobin values during the study were pretreatment 10.1 g/dl, half-way through treatment 12.3 g/dl, 4 weeks after concomitant radiochemotherapy 12.7 g/dl, the week prior to surgery 12.5 g/dl, and after surgery 10.9 g/dl. No patient required transfusion before or after surgery. The probability or risk of postoperative complications was 27.3%, and included one rectovaginal fistula, one parastomal hernia, one case of ileus and two surgical wound infections. In this series, downstaging was observed in 81.8% of patients, and downsizing in 90.9%. Most interestingly, histopathological complete response rate was achieved by 18.2%. Epoetin-beta (EB) treatment in our series of patients with digestive malignancies subjected to neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy proved effective and safe, avoiding the need for transfusion during surgery.

BACKGROUND Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents have improved the outcome and quality of life in patients with chronic kidney disease. OBJECTIVE We investigated the efficacy and safety of conversion of hemodialysis patients from epoetin beta to darbepoetin alfa administered once a month. PATIENTS AND METHODS The study included 26 patients. Their mean age was 47.0 6 17.13 years with a mean hemodialysis duration of 55.8 ± 14.0 months. The study was carried out in 2 consecutive phases of 12 weeks each. The mean initial dose of darbepoetin was 57 ± 10.0 mg biweekly. After maintaining target hemoglobin (Hgb) levels—(11–12 g/L)—with the biweekly injections, we shifted our patients to a once-monthly dose schedule. RESULTS The mean weekly darbepoetin dose increased from 28.75 ± 4.2 mg during the biweekly phase to 38.5 ± 3.9 mg after switching to the monthly protocol (the mean conversion ratio changed from 309:1 to 256:1). The mean Hgb level was 10.81 ± .86 g/L at the start of the study and 10.86 ± .76 g/L at the end of 6 months. CONCLUSION Our experience with darbepoetin alfa reveals that it is effective and safe for the treatment of anemia in hemodialysis patients even at monthly dose intervals.

Purpose, patients and methods This retrospective analysis of the BRAVE study evaluated the impact of baseline risk factors and antithrombotic therapy on the risk of thrombovascular events (TVEs) in patients receiving epoetin compared to patients not receiving epoetin. Results Baseline risk factors have a significant impact on TVE risk under epoetin therapy. More than 2 risk factors increased the risk of TVEs in patients receiving epoetin (hazard ratio [HR] 2.89, confidence interval [CI] 1.04–8.02, p value [ p ] = 0.04). In patients on epoetin without antithrombotic therapy, the risk for TVEs was higher (HR 4.11, CI 1.37–12.4, p = 0.01) compared to those who received antithrombotics (HR 1.37, CI 0.59–3.18, p = 0.45). Conclusions Our analysis has identified several risk factors which may impact the risk of TVEs under epoetin therapy. These data suggest that antithrombotic therapy may have the potential to reduce the risk of TVEs under epoetin therapy. These findings are hypothesis-generating and need to be confirmed in a prospective, randomised study.

Background: Epoetin-β is used to treat patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy to alleviate the symptoms of anaemia, reduce the risk of blood transfusions and improve quality of life (QoL). Methods: This meta-analysis of all 12 randomised, controlled studies of epoetin-β evaluated the impact of therapy at different Hb-initiation levels and to different target Hb levels on overall survival, tumour progression and thromboembolic events (TEE). An analysis of risk factors pre-disposing patients to TEEs under epoetin-β therapy was also performed. A total of 2297 patients are included in the analysis. Results: Analyses based on various Hb-initiation levels indicate no detrimental impact on survival (HR 0.99; 95% CI 0.70, 1.40) and a favourable impact on disease progression (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.57, 0.94) when epoetin-β was used within its licensed indication (Hb initiation ⩽10 g dl−1) or the EORTC recommended level of 11 g dl−1. An increased risk of TEEs is seen for all Hb-initiation level strata and a detrimental impact on survival is seen when initiating epoetin-β therapy at Hb levels >11 g dl−1. We observe no association between high target Hb levels (⩾13 g dl−1) and an increased risk of mortality, disease progression or TEEs with epoetin-β compared with control. Conclusion: The results of this analysis indicate that epoetin-β therapy has no detrimental impact on survival or tumour progression when initiated at Hb levels up to 11 g dl−1. Furthermore, there is no evidence to suggest that high Hb values achieved during epoetin-β therapy are associated with an increased mortality, disease progression or TEE rate.

We estimated the efficacy of oral iron therapy during treatment with rhEPO in patients undergoing cardiac surgery who were contraindicated for autologous blood donation. Seventy-six patients were enrolled in this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial and assigned to the 2 treatment groups (5x500 U/kg body weight rhEPO or placebo intravenously over 14 d before surgery). During the treatment period all patients received 300 mg Fe2+ (iron glycine sulfate) orally per day. rhEPO therapy produced significant increases in hemoglobin concentration (Hb), reticulocyte count, hematocrit (Hct) and the hypochromic red blood cells (HRBC), and a decrease in transferrin saturation (41%) compared to the placebo group before surgery. However, the preoperative increase in HRBC was independent of the baseline ferritin and even correlated positively with the preoperative increase in Hct (r=0.47, p

A multicenter randomized controlled study was undertaken in order to determine whether epoetin beta (EPO) ameliorates the anemia in aplastic anemia (AA) patients treated with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Enrolled patients were randomized into 3 groups: group C receiving G-CSF alone as the control; group L receiving G-CSF and 200 IU/kg of EPO; group H receiving G-CSF and 400 IU/kg of EPO. Throughout the study, the dose and the administration interval of G-CSF were adjusted to maintain neutrophil counts between 1000 and 5000 microliters EPO was administered subcutaneously for 12 wk as the first step in treatment and when favorable effects were observed over this period, treatment was continued for another 12 wk as the second step in treatment. Significant erythroid responses were defined as increases in untransfused hemoglobin values > 1.0 g/dl or > 50% decreases in RBC transfusion requirements over the treatment period. Of 131 patients enrolled, 88 patients allocated to groups L and H were evaluated for toxicity to EPO and 110 were evaluated for erythroid responses. Four of the 31 patients (12.9%) in group C, 6 of the 41 patients (14.6%) of group L, and 14 of the 38 patients (36.8%) of group H showed erythroid responses in the first step in treatment. The erythroid responses of group H were significantly higher than those of the other 2 groups (p < 0.05). The significant effects of EPO were due to erythroid responses in non-severe AA. Responding patients were significantly different from non-responders with regard to disease severity, hemoglobin concentration, reticulocyte count, serum endogenous erythropoietin levels and serum transferrin receptors; non-severe AA patients were more likely to respond to EPO, and responding patients had lower serum EPO and higher hemoglobin concentration, reticulocyte count and serum transferrin receptors than non-responders. The response rate increased in the second step in treatment, suggesting that long-term treatment improved the efficacy of EPO. No serious side-effects were observed. From these results, we conclude that EPO given in combination with G-CSF is a safe and effective alternative for the treatment of anemia of a subset of AA patients.

French and international clinical practice guidelines recommend a minimum hemoglobin level of 11 g/dl in patients with chronic kidney disease. Previous studies implemented between 1996 and 2003 showed that only 35 to 55% the patients reach this target. Dialysis NeoRecormon Epidemiology (DiaNE) is a one-year French multicentric observational study designed to follow a cohort of 1200 patients with ESRD treated with epoetin beta to assess the management of anemia in routine nephrologic practice. From December 2003 to September 2004, 1241 hemodialysis patients were recruited by 229 centers. At baseline, 64.4% of patients had hemoglobin levels greater than 11 g/dl. The proportion of patients with hemoglobin levels greater than 11 g/dl at the end of the study was 71.6%. These results could be partly explained by iron deficiency: 46% of patients had a serum ferritin between 200 and 500 microg/l and about one third of patients had a transferrin-iron saturation percentage greater or equal to 30% at baseline and at the end of the study. Epoetin beta was administrated by subcutaneous route in 65.5% of patients with similar efficacy and with less mean doses than intravenous route (114.6+/-81.5 IU/kg versus 146.5+/-124.3 IU/kg at the end of the study). In conclusion, the management of anemia in hemodialysis patients is not optimal but is slightly better than the management observed between 1996 and 2003. Iron and inflammatory status should be taken into account to improve the efficacy of anemia therapy using erythropoietin-stimulating agents.

The anaemia of chronic disease is a concomitant phenomenon of various chronic intectious, neoplastic and autoimmune diseases. Whenever possible, the treatment of the underlying disease is the treatment of choice. When this is not feasible at present blood transfusion, iron therapy and the use of erythropoietic agents are further treatment options. Blood transfusions are reserved for the short-term use in the case of life-threatening anaemia (Hb 100 μg/L) without functional iron deficiency should not be treated with iron. The erythropoietic stimulation with the currently available agents epoetin alfa, epoetin beta and darbepoetin can result in a nearly 100% therapeutic response provided the individual iron requirements are considered. Using erythropoietin in combination with iron in patients with RA und ACD, it has been shown that besides the correction of the haemoglobin deficit also disease activity as well as health-related quality of life could be approved. The risk-benefit ratio of the treatment of ACD regarding the underlying disease has, however, not been fully evaluated so far. This is also true for the use of iron and erythropoietin in the treatment of ACD. Further therapeutic options such as the use of iron chelating agents or other agents with an influence on the regulation of the cellular iron metabolism are in preclinical evaluation. It can, however, already be stated with regard to an appropriate management of patients with rheumatic diseases, regardless of the underlying disease, that ACD can be treated effectively.

Administration of Erythropoietin Receptor Agonists (ERAs) is indicated as standard of care for treatment of anaemia in cancer patients. Considering the Italian setting, only limited information is available on the economic impact of ERAs epoetin alfa, epoetin beta and darbepoetin alfa in the treatment of anaemic cancer patients. So, this analysis was conducted to compare cost per patient of each of these agents. Data for this retrospective study were derived from the administrative database of a middle-sized (half a million beneficiaries) Local Health Unit in Northern Italy. A sample was built by selecting all patients who, between 2005 and 2006, had a cancer diagnosis and had received at least two prescription for ERA. The study evaluated durations of treatments and weekly costs associated with either treatment. The original sample consisted of 322 patients (mean age: 65.6 years, 52.5% females). The mean duration of treatment was 7.52 weeks for epoetin alfa and 8.68 weeks for darbepoetin alfa (p = 0.16). The annual mean cost of treatment was €2,413.23/patient treated with epoetin alfa and €3,492.23/patient (+45%) treated with darbepoetin alfa (p < 0.001). Based on data from an Italian Local Health Unit, we performed an analysis focused on the use of ERAs in the treatment of anemia in cancer patients. Analysis results were interesting, particularly as attempt to estimate the annual mean cost of treatment between epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa, which resulted consistent with a previous European study. This evaluation showed that epoetin is a cost-saving strategy compared with darbepoetin alfa in the treatment of cancer patients anaemia. An important limitation was that patient records did not provide an indicator of disease severity.

Iain RJ Macpherson, Colin R Lindsay, Nicholas S ReedBeatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United KingdomAbstract: Anemia is a common complication of systemic anti-cancer treatment. In this context epoetin beta, like other erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), has demonstrable efficacy in raising Hb concentration and reducing the requirement for red cell transfusion. Consequently ESA therapy has gained increasing prominence in the management of chemotherapy-related anemia. However, recent trial data have suggested a higher rate of thromboembolic events, enhanced tumor progression and reduced survival in some patients with cancer who receive ESA therapy. In response, regulatory authorities have mandated increasingly restrictive label changes. In light of these new developments we consider the current role of epoetin beta in the management of chemotherapy-related anemia.Keywords: anemia, cancer, erythropoietin, epoetin, chemotherapy

Objective: The efficacy and safety of weekly administration of epoetin beta (EPO) for chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) patients was evaluated. Methods: One hundred and twenty-two patients with lung cancer or malignant lymphoma undergoing chemotherapy were randomized to the EPO 36 000 IU group or the placebo group. Hematological response and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion requirement were assessed. Quality of life (QOL) was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia (FACT-An) questionnaire. Results: Mean change in hemoglobin level with EPO increased significantly over placebo (1.4+1.9 g/dl versus 20.8+1.5 g/dl; P , 0.001). The proportion of patients with change in hemoglobin level 2.0 g/dl was higher for EPO than those for placebo (P , 0.001). After 4 weeks of administration, the proportion of RBC transfusion or hemoglobin level ,8.0 g/dl was significantly lower for EPO than those for placebo (P ¼ 0.046). The changes in the FACT-An total Fatigue Subscale Score (FSS) were less deteriorated with EPO than those with placebo. Progressive disease (PD) did not influence the change in hemoglobin level but there was less decrease in FSS in non-PD patients. No significant differences in adverse events were observed. Thrombovascular events and pure red cell aplasia related to EPO were not observed. Retrospective analysis of survival showing the hazard ratio of EPO to placebo was 0.94. Conclusion: Weekly administration of EPO 36 000 IU significantly increased hemoglobin level and ameliorated the decline of QOL in CIA patients over the 8-week administration period.

Erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) are the main tool to achieve anemia correction in CKD patients. At present six different ESAs are available: epoetin alpha, epoetin beta, epoetin omega, epoetin delta, darbepoetin alpha, and very recently CERA. From one side the patent of older ESAs have expired, and biosimilars (for the moment only of epoetin alpha) have been approved for use in Europe by the European Medicines Agency. However, a number of issues about bioequivalence and how to test it are still to be solved completely. In the mean time pharmaceutical research has kept on working, developing new ESAs and alternative strategies for stimulating erythropoiesis. In this review we present and discuss these points.

Udgivelsesdato: 2008-Nov BACKGROUND: Extending the administration interval of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) represents an opportunity to improve the efficiency of anaemia management in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, effective haemoglobin (Hb) maintenance can be challenging with epoetin alfa and epoetin beta administered at extended intervals. C.E.R.A., a continuous erythropoietin receptor activator, has a unique pharmacologic profile and long half-life ( approximately 130 h), allowing administration at extended intervals. Phase III results have demonstrated that C.E.R.A. administered once every 4 weeks effectively maintains stable Hb levels in patients with CKD on dialysis. METHODS: STRIATA (Stabilizing haemoglobin TaRgets in dialysis following IV C.E.R.A. Treatment for Anaemia) was a multicentre, open-label randomized phase III study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous C.E.R.A. administered once every 2 weeks (Q2W) for Hb maintenance following direct conversion from darbepoetin alfa (DA). Adult patients on dialysis receiving stable intravenous DA once weekly (QW) or Q2W were randomized (1:1) to continue their current DA regimen (n = 156) or receive intravenous C.E.R.A. Q2W (n = 157) for 52 weeks. Doses were adjusted to maintain Hb levels within +/- 1.0 g/dl of baseline and between 10.0 and 13.5 g/dl. The primary endpoint was the mean Hb change between baseline and the evaluation period (weeks 29-36). RESULTS: Most patients (>80%) received DA QW before randomization. The mean (95% CI) difference between C.E.R.A. and DA in the primary endpoint was 0.18 g/dl (-0.05, 0.41), within a pre-defined non-inferiority limit. C.E.R.A. was clinically non-inferior to DA (P < 0.0001) in maintaining Hb levels. Both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Stable Hb levels were successfully maintained in patients on haemodialysis directly converted to Q2W intravenous C.E.R.A. from DA.

T he best-selling oncology drugs in the United States, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), have been taken by about half of all U.S. cancer patients to treat chemotherapy-induced anemia — more than the number receiving radiation therapy. But that is changing. This summer, European and American regulatory authorities stringently restricted who should take ESAs, the most recent in a series of steps taken in response to clinical trials and basic research indicating that ESAs may harm cancer patients. Last year, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services began denying coverage for the use of ESAs in cancer patients not undergoing chemotherapy and in those whose hemoglobin level is 10 g/dL or above. The center has further restricted use of darbepoetin, a second-generation, extendedrelease version, in patients undergoing chemotherapy. ESAs include epoetin alfa (Amgen’s Epogen and Procrit, which is manufactured by Amgen but licensed to Johnson & Johnson’s Ortho Biotech), Amgen’s longer-lasting darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp), and, in Europe, epoetin beta (NeoRecormon). The drugs are recombinant forms of erythropoietin (EPO), a naturally occurring hormone that is produced by the kidneys and controls red blood cell production. For the past 15 years, oncologists have prescribed ESAs to millions of anemic cancer patients in place of blood transfusions, hoping to improve their quality of life. Amgen scientists also reasoned that increasing anemic patients’ hemoglobin levels would help oxygenate tumors, thereby decreasing resistance to chemotherapy and radiation and improving outcomes. But a growing body of research on patients with head and neck, lymphoid, breast, cervical, and non – small-cell lung cancers and multiple myeloma indicates that patients taking ESAs have worse overall survival and tumor control when the drugs are given at hemoglobin levels higher than 12 g/dL. These patients are also more likely than patients who did not receive ESAs to have high blood pressure and thrombovascular events (TVEs). However, a study published in July in the Journal of Clinical Oncology suggested that patients with myelodysplastic syndrome treated long term with ESAs plus a white blood cell growth factor may have a survival advantage if they require few blood transfusions. But studies also show that ESAs reduce the need for transfusions only minimally, if at all, and that they usually do not imp rove patients’ quality of life. Ironically, the drugs were approved in 1993 as a safer alternative to blood transfusions just when the blood supply began to be screened for hepatitis B and C and human immunodeficiency virus, rendering blood much safer, while ESAs’ safety is now seriously questioned. The stakes in this controversy could hardly be higher: a large share of the profi ts of Amgen and Ortho Biotech; thousands of dollars of income for private practice oncologists who prescribe and administer these drugs; and, most important, the safety of cancer patients.