Search

BACKGROUND: Patients with von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) disease have a high incidence of renal cell carcinoma owing to VHL gene inactivation and constitutive activation of the transcription factor hypoxia-inducible factor 2α (HIF-2α). METHODS: In this phase 2, open-label, single-group trial, we investigated the efficacy and safety of the HIF-2α inhibitor belzutifan (MK-6482, previously called PT2977), administered orally at a dose of 120 mg daily, in patients with renal cell carcinoma associated with VHL disease. The primary end point was objective response (complete or partial response) as measured according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, by an independent central radiology review committee. We also assessed responses to belzutifan in patients with non–renal cell carcinoma neoplasms and the safety of belzutifan. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 21.8 months (range, 20.2 to 30.1), the percentage of patients with renal cell carcinoma who had an objective response was 49% (95% confidence interval, 36 to 62). Responses were also observed in patients with pancreatic lesions (47 of 61 patients [77%]) and central nervous system hemangioblastomas (15 of 50 patients [30%]). Among the 16 eyes that could be evaluated in 12 patients with retinal hemangioblastomas at baseline, all (100%) were graded as showing improvement. The most common adverse events were anemia (in 90% of the patients) and fatigue (in 66%). Seven patients discontinued treatment: four patients voluntarily discontinued, one discontinued owing to a treatment-related adverse event (grade 1 dizziness), one discontinued because of disease progression as assessed by the investigator, and one patient died (of acute toxic effects of fentanyl). CONCLUSIONS: Belzutifan was associated with predominantly grade 1 and 2 adverse events and showed activity in patients with renal cell carcinomas and non–renal cell carcinoma neoplasms associated with VHL disease. (Funded by Merck Sharp and Dohme and others; MK-6482-004 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03401788.)

INTRODUCTION: Metastatic prostate cancer is a heterogeneous disease characterized by clinical and genomic heterogeneity. Many prostate cancers harbor mutations causing DNA repair deficiency, specifically homologous recombination deficiency, sensitizing to drugs that inhibit poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP). PARP is an enzyme that is involved in single-stranded DNA repair and is the target of newly approved treatments for metastatic prostate cancer. AREAS COVERED: Here, the authors’ review the clinical trials leading to the recent approvals of two PARP inhibitors (PARPi), olaparib and rucaparib, specifically TOPARP-A, TOPARP-B, PROfound and TRITON-2. They also compare the different FDA approvals for both of these medications and outline the safety of this class of drugs in prostate cancer. EXPERT OPINION: Because PARPi are particularly effective in men with somatic or germline alterations in BRCA1 and BRCA2, we recommend that all men be tested for DNA alterations with next-generation sequencing in tumor cells obtained from either tissue or blood. We also recommend that olaparib or rucaparib be considered relatively early in the treatment sequence in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. Other DNA alterations might also sensitize to PARPi though the response rates are lower, so other standard therapies should be prioritized first.

PURPOSE In this phase II response-adaptive trial, we investigated the rational application of immune checkpoint blockade in renal cell carcinoma (RCC; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03203473 ). METHODS We enrolled patients with metastatic RCC with no prior checkpoint inhibitor exposure. All patients received nivolumab alone with subsequent arm allocation based on response. Patients with a confirmed partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) within 6 months discontinued nivolumab and were observed (arm A). Patients with stable disease or progressive disease (PD) after no more than 6 months of nivolumab received two doses of ipilimumab (arm B). The primary endpoints were the proportion of patients with PR/CR at 1 year after nivolumab discontinuation (arm A) and proportion of nivolumab nonresponders who converted to PR/CR after ipilimumab (arm B). RESULTS Overall, 83 patients initiated treatment, of whom 96% had clear-cell histology, 51% were treatment naïve, and 67% had intermediate/poor-risk disease. Median follow-up was 19.5 months. Within 6 months, induction nivolumab resulted in a confirmed PR in 12% of patients (n = 10). Fourteen patients were not allocated to a study arm (seven because of toxicity, seven because of PD). Twelve patients (14%) were allocated to arm A and discontinued nivolumab, of whom five (42%; 90% CI, 18% to 68%) remained off nivolumab at ≥ 1 year. Of 57 patients (69%) allocated to arm B, two patients converted to a confirmed PR (4%; 90% CI, 1% to 11%), and no CRs were observed. CONCLUSION In this study, nivolumab followed by two doses of ipilimumab resulted in no CRs and a low PR/CR conversion. The number of patients evaluated for nivolumab discontinuation was too small to assess the value of this approach. Currently, our data do not support a response-adaptive strategy for checkpoint blockade in advanced RCC.

Background Genomic biomarkers that predict response to anti‐PD1 therapy in prostate cancer are needed. Frameshift mutations are predicted to generate more neoantigens than missense mutations; therefore, we hypothesized that the number or proportion of tumor frameshift mutations would correlate with response to anti‐PD1 therapy in prostate cancer. Methods To enrich for response to anti‐PD1 therapy, we assembled a multicenter cohort of 65 men with mismatch repair‐deficient (dMMR) prostate cancer. Patient characteristics and outcomes were determined by retrospective chart review. Clinical somatic DNA sequencing was used to determine tumor mutational burden (TMB), frameshift mutation burden, and frameshift mutation proportion (FSP), which were correlated to outcomes on anti‐PD1 treatment. We subsequently used data from a clinical trial of pembrolizumab in patients with nonprostatic dMMR cancers of various histologies as a biomarker validation cohort. Results Nineteen of 65 patients with dMMR metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer were treated with anti‐PD1 therapy. The PSA50 response rate was 65%, and the median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 24 (95% confidence interval 16–54) weeks. Tumor FSP, more than overall TMB, correlated most strongly with prolonged PFS and overall survival (OS) on anti‐PD1 treatment and with density of CD8+ tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes. High FSP similarly identified patients with longer PFS as well as OS on anti‐PD1 therapy in a validation cohort. Conclusion Tumor FSP correlated with prolonged efficacy of anti‐PD1 treatment among patients with dMMR cancers and may represent a new biomarker of immune checkpoint inhibitor sensitivity. Implications for Practice Given the modest efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) in unselected patients with advanced prostate cancer, biomarkers of ICI sensitivity are needed. To facilitate biomarker discovery, a cohort of patients with DNA mismatch repair‐deficient (dMMR) prostate cancer was assembled, as these patients are enriched for responses to ICI. A high response rate to anti‐PD1 therapy in these patients was observed; however, these responses were not durable in most patients. Notably, tumor frameshift mutation proportion (FSP) was identified as a novel biomarker that was associated with prolonged response to anti‐PD1 therapy in this cohort. This finding was validated in a separate cohort of patients with nonprostatic dMMR cancers of various primary histologies. This works suggests that FSP predicts response to anti‐PD1 therapy in dMMR cancers, which should be validated prospectively in larger independent cohorts., Biomarkers of immune checkpoint inhibition sensitivity are needed. This article reports on genomic biomarkers that may predict response to anti‐PD1 therapy in prostate cancer.

Recently, mutations in speckle-type pox virus and zinc finger protein (SPOP) gene (mutant SPOP [mtSPOP]) have been associated with improved outcomes to abiraterone in the castration-resistant setting. We hypothesized that mtSPOP would be associated with improved outcomes to systemic therapy in men with de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (d-mCSPC). Retrospective data of newly diagnosed d-mCSPC patients were collected from four institutions. Eligibility criteria included standard androgen deprivation therapy without intensification, and SPOP mutational status (mtSPOP or wild-type SPOP [wtSPOP]) determination by targeted next-generation sequencing from tumor biopsies. A total of 121 men (25 mtSPOP [21%] and 96 wtSPOP [79%]) were included. After adjusting for covariates, mtSPOP was significantly associated with better median progression-free survival (35 vs 13 mo; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.47; p = 0.016) and overall survival (97 vs 69 mo; adjusted HR 0.32; p = 0.027), with similar HR and p value on the univariate analysis. These findings, upon external validation, may assist with counseling and prognostication in the clinic, and inform the design of future clinical trials in this setting. Patient summary : Presence of tumor mutation in speckle-type pox virus and zinc finger protein (SPOP) gene was associated with improved survival outcomes in men with de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer receiving standard androgen deprivation therapy.

PURPOSE In prostate cancer, inactivating CDK12 mutations lead to gene fusion–induced neoantigens and possibly sensitivity to immunotherapy. We aimed to clinically, pathologically, and molecularly characterize CDK12-aberrant prostate cancers. METHODS We conducted a retrospective multicenter study to identify patients with advanced prostate cancer who harbored somatic loss-of-function CDK12 mutations. We used descriptive statistics to characterize their clinical features and therapeutic outcomes (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] responses, progression-free survival [PFS]) to various systemic therapies, including sensitivity to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase and PD-1 inhibitors. RESULTS Sixty men with at least monoallelic (51.7% biallelic) CDK12 alterations were identified across nine centers. Median age at diagnosis was 60.5 years; 71.7% and 28.3% were white and nonwhite, respectively; 93.3% had Gleason grade group 4-5; 15.4% had ductal/intraductal histology; 53.3% had metastases at diagnosis; and median PSA was 24.0 ng/mL. Of those who underwent primary androgen deprivation therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive disease (n = 59), 79.7% had a PSA response, and median PFS was 12.3 months. Of those who received first-line abiraterone and enzalutamide for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC; n = 34), 41.2% had a PSA response, and median PFS was 5.3 months. Of those who received a first taxane chemotherapy for mCRPC (n = 22), 31.8% had a PSA response, and median PFS was 3.8 months. Eleven men received a PARP inhibitor (olaparib [n = 10], rucaparib [n = 1]), and none had a PSA response (median PFS, 3.6 months). Nine men received a PD-1 inhibitor as fourth- to sixth-line systemic therapy (pembrolizumab [n = 5], nivolumab [n = 4]); 33.3% had a PSA response, and median PFS was 5.4 months. CONCLUSION CDK12-altered prostate cancer is an aggressive subtype with poor outcomes to hormonal and taxane therapies as well as to PARP inhibitors. A proportion of these patients may respond favorably to PD-1 inhibitors, which implicates CDK12 deficiency in immunotherapy sensitivity.

Introduction Locally advanced penile cancer is rare, with few reported studies on the therapeutic role of chemoradiotherapy. We sought to characterize the efficacy and toxicity of definitive chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced, node-positive, squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Materials and Methods Six patients who had refused or were ineligible for surgical resection of clinically staged node-positive squamous cell penile cancer were treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy using either weekly cisplatin or 2 cycles of mitomycin C/5-fluorouracil. The mean radiation dose to the primary sites, involved lymph nodes, involved nodal basins, and uninvolved nodal basins was 57.2, 55.0, 49.7, and 42.3 equivalent dose delivered in 2-Gy fractions. Results With a median follow-up of 7.2 years, 4 of the 6 patients were recurrence-free and 2 had developed recurrence. One of the latter died of penile-specific complications after salvage surgery to treat the recurrence. Of the 6 patients, 4 experienced long-term penectomy-free survival. No patient developed distant metastasis after therapy. The 4 patients with durable penectomy-free survival reported excellent urologic, sexual, and bowel function, as assessed by various validated patient-reported outcome surveys and subjective reports. One of the 2 patients with recurrence was successfully salvaged with penectomy. Lymphedema and stricture were not reported by any of the patients. Conclusions Definitive chemoradiotherapy is an effective organ-sparing treatment of node-positive penile cancer, with durable disease control and maintenance of quality of life. This treatment option should be offered to carefully counseled patients within the context of expert multidisciplinary teams and should be incorporated into expert consensus treatment guidelines.

Purpose: Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is frequently associated with inactivation of the von Hippel–Lindau tumor suppressor, resulting in activation of HIF-1α and HIF-2α. The current paradigm, established using mechanistic cell-based studies, supports a tumor promoting role for HIF-2α, and a tumor suppressor role for HIF-1α. However, few studies have comprehensively examined the clinical relevance of this paradigm. Furthermore, the hypoxia-associated factor (HAF), which regulates the HIFs, has not been comprehensively evaluated in ccRCC. Experimental Design: To assess the involvement of HAF/HIFs in ccRCC, we analyzed their relationship to tumor grade/stage/outcome using tissue from 380 patients, and validated these associations using tissue from 72 additional patients and a further 57 patients treated with antiangiogenic therapy for associations with response. Further characterization was performed using single-cell mRNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), RNA-in situ hybridization (RNA-ISH), and IHC. Results: HIF-1α was primarily expressed in tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), whereas HIF-2α and HAF were expressed primarily in tumor cells. TAM-associated HIF-1α was significantly associated with high tumor grade and increased metastasis and was independently associated with decreased overall survival. Furthermore, elevated TAM HIF-1α was significantly associated with resistance to antiangiogenic therapy. In contrast, high HAF or HIF-2α were associated with low grade, decreased metastasis, and increased overall survival. scRNA-seq, RNA-ISH, and Western blotting confirmed the expression of HIF-1α in M2-polarized CD163-expressing TAMs. Conclusions: These findings highlight a potential role of TAM HIF-1α in ccRCC progression and support the reevaluation of HIF-1α as a therapeutic target and marker of disease progression.

BACKGROUND Small cell neuroendocrine (NE) carcinomas of the prostate classically lose androgen receptor (AR) expression, may harbor loss of the RB1, TP53, and PTEN tumor suppressor genes, and are associated with a poor prognosis. However usual-type adenocarcinomas may also contain areas of NE differentiation, and in this context the molecular features and biological significance are less certain. METHODS We examined the molecular phenotype and oncologic outcomes of primary prostate adenocarcinomas with ≥5% NE differentiation (≥5% chromogranin A-positive NE cells in any given tumor spot on tissue microarray) using three independent study sets: a set of tumors with paneth cell-like NE differentiation (n = 26), a retrospective case-cohort of intermediate- and high-risk patients enriched for adverse outcomes (n = 267), and primary tumors from a retrospective series of men with eventual castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer (CRPC) treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide (n = 55). RESULTS Benign NE cells expressed significantly lower quantified AR levels compared with paired benign luminal cells (P

Purpose: PARP inhibitors (PARPi) are efficacious in multiple cancers harboring germline (and possibly somatic) BRCA1/2 mutations. Acquired reversions can restore BRCA1/2 function, causing resistance to PARPi and/or platinum-based chemotherapy. The optimal method of identifying patients with germline, somatic, and/or reversion mutations in BRCA1/2 has not been established. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) provides a platform to identify these three types of BRCA1/2 mutations. Experimental Design: Patients with advanced breast, ovarian, prostate, or pancreatic cancer were tested using a clinically validated 73-gene cfDNA assay that evaluates single-nucleotide variants and insertion–deletion mutations (indels) in BRCA1/2, and distinguishes somatic/reversion from germline mutations with high accuracy. Results: Among 828 patients, one or more deleterious BRCA1/2 mutations were detected in 60 (7.2%) patients, including germline (n = 42) and somatic (n = 18) mutations. Common coexisting mutations included TP53 (61.6%), MYC (30%), PIK3CA (26.6%), BRAF (15%), and ESR1 (11.5%). Polyclonal reversion mutations (median, 5) were detected in 9 of 42 (21.4%) germline BRCA1/2-mutant patients, the majority (77.7%) of whom had prior PARPi exposure (median duration, 10 months). Serial cfDNA demonstrated emergence of reversion BRCA mutations under therapeutic pressure from initial PARPi exposure, which contributed to subsequent resistance to PARPi and platinum therapy. Conclusions: cfDNA NGS identified high rates of therapeutically relevant mutations without foreknowledge of germline or tissue-based testing results, including deleterious somatic BRCA1/2 mutations missed by germline testing and reversion mutations that can have important treatment implications. Further research is needed to confirm clinical utility of these findings to guide precision medicine approaches for patients with advanced malignancies.

Purpose: Radium-223 is approved for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) based on improved overall survival, and delay in skeletal related events. However, it is not associated with PSA or radiographic response, which poses a challenge in real-time assessment of its efficacy. Surrogate markers of treatment outcomes may facilitate tailoring treatment duration with radium-223, by limiting the duration of therapy with radium-223 in these patients. Here, we sought to investigate the utility of bone metabolic markers (BMMs) as surrogate markers of response to radium-223 in mCRPC. Patients and Methods: A prospective phase II trial of radium-223 plus enzalutamide (RE) versus enzalutamide alone was designed to assess surrogacy of BMMs with respect to response to radium-223. Enzalutamide was used as a comparator in lieu of placebo due to the progressive disease. Co-primary endpoints were relative change in serum BMM N-telopeptide (NTP) levels from baseline to 6 months between the two arms and safety and feasibility of the combination. Results: Thirty-nine men were randomized to RE (n = 27) or enzalutamide (n = 12). Combination was safe and feasible. Primary endpoint was met. A statistically significant relative change to NTP ratios between arms (0.64, 95% confidence interval, 0.51–0.81; P = 0.00048) favored RE versus enzalutamide. Overall, BMMs decreased with the RE therapy compared with enzalutamide. Improved PSA response rate in RE versus enzalutamide (P = 0.024), correlated with decline in BMMs. Conclusions: BMMs declined significantly with combination therapy, and were associated with improved outcomes. Upon external validation, BMMs may emerge as surrogate markers to monitor treatment with radium-223 in real-time.

Cabozantinib is an oral, tyrosine-kinase inhibitor with potent activity against VEGFR2 and MET, along with multiple other tyrosine kinases involved in cancer development and progression. Herein, we will focus on preclinical and clinical studies leading to the approval of cabozantinib in advanced renal cell carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma. Covered studies include NCT01100619, CABOSUN, METEOR, NCT00940225 and the CELESTIAL trial. Finally, we review future directions of cabozantinib development by highlighting some ongoing clinical trials.

BACKGROUND Guidelines have changed recently to include genetic counseling (GC) and/or genetic testing (GT) for all men with aggressive prostate cancer (PCa). This study aimed to identify what information men with PCa desire before and from GC. METHODS Focus groups were conducted with men who have PCa. Audio recordings were analyzed for themes related to GT, the information they desired from health care providers, and implications for family members. RESULTS Thirty-seven men with PCa participated in seven focus groups. Nearly all men felt GT was beneficial and impactful for their family and themselves. Most men were unaware of the risks to female relatives associated with hereditary cancer. Participants discussed that genetics should be incorporated at an appropriate time of their diagnostic journey. CONCLUSION This study showed that men valued GC and GT for personal and familial implications, and often did not associate PCa genetics with risk for female relatives to develop cancer. Consideration should be given to the GC timing in regard to where men are in their treatment process. Providers referring patients can leverage patient motivations and utilize their relationship with the patient to determine the appropriate timing and personalize discussion with the patient regarding GC and GT.

BACKGROUND: In a single-group, phase 1b trial, avelumab plus axitinib resulted in objective responses in patients with advanced renal-cell carcinoma. This phase 3 trial involving previously untreated patients with advanced renal-cell carcinoma compared avelumab plus axitinib with the standard-of-care sunitinib. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients in a 1:1 ratio to receive avelumab (10 mg per kilogram of body weight) intravenously every 2 weeks plus axitinib (5 mg) orally twice daily or sunitinib (50 mg) orally once daily for 4 weeks (6-week cycle). The two independent primary end points were progression-free survival and overall survival among patients with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)–positive tumors. A key secondary end point was progression-free survival in the overall population; other end points included objective response and safety. RESULTS: A total of 886 patients were assigned to receive avelumab plus axitinib (442 patients) or sunitinib (444 patients). Among the 560 patients with PD-L1–positive tumors (63.2%), the median progression-free survival was 13.8 months with avelumab plus axitinib, as compared with 7.2 months with sunitinib (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47 to 0.79; P

PURPOSE Our objective was to evaluate operating characteristics, particularly specificity and positive predictive value (PPV), by mapping plasma miR371 expression to actual clinical events in patients with a history of germ cell tumor. PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred eleven male patients with a history of or newly diagnosed germ cell tumors were evaluable. Biospecimens obtained before confirmed clinical events were analyzed for miR371 expression with blinding of providers and laboratory personnel to analytic results or clinical status, respectively. Cases (patients with clinically confirmed active germ cell malignancy [aGCM]) and controls (patients with no clinically confirmed aGCM) were assigned over the course of the management. Patients were assigned risk status (high, low, or moderate) based on the composite clinical picture at time points in management. RESULTS Considering all cases and controls and results of prospectively obtained biosamples analyzed for miR371 expression, 46 (35%) of 132 samples had clinically confirmed aGCM over the course of management; 44 (96%) of these 46 patients had plasma miR371 expression (true positives) with no false positives. Two (4%) of 46 patients had no miRNA expression despite pathologic confirmation of aGCM (false negatives). Plasma miR371 expression in confirmed aGCM had a specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 100%, 96%, 100%, and 98%, respectively. Interpretation of sensitivity and negative predictive value is limited by modest follow-up. Specificity and sensitivity were 100% and 98%, 100% and 92%, and 100% and 97% in the low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups, respectively, with a median follow-up time of 15 months. CONCLUSION Plasma miR371 expression predicts aGCM with high specificity and positive predictive value. Although other operating characteristics of miR371 await longer follow-up for more complete definition, the findings of a highly specific liquid biopsy strongly support moving forward with large-scale, real-world clinical trials to further define full operating characteristics and to identify clinical utility and areas of patient benefit.

Background: Both novel hormonal therapies and docetaxel are approved for treatment of metastatic prostate cancer (mPC, in castration sensitive or refractory settings). Present knowledge gaps include lack of real-world data on treatment patterns in patients with newly diagnosed mPC, and comparative effectiveness of novel hormonal therapies (NHT) versus docetaxel after treatment with a prior NHT. Methods: Herein we extracted patient-level data from a large real-world database of patients with mPC in United States. Utilization of NHT or docetaxel for mPC and comparative effectiveness of an alternate NHT versus docetaxel after one prior NHT was evaluated. Comparative effectiveness was examined via Cox proportional hazards model with propensity score matching weights. Each patient’s propensity for treatment was modeled via random forest based on 22 factors potentially driving treatment selection. Results: The majority of patients (54%) received only androgen deprivation therapy for mPC. In patients treated with an NHT, alternate NHT was the most common next therapy and was associated with improved median overall survival over docetaxel (abiraterone followed by docetaxel vs. enzalutamide (8.7 vs. 15.6 months, adjusted hazards ratio, aHR 1.32, p = 0.009, and enzalutamide followed by docetaxel vs. abiraterone (9.7 vs. 13.2 months aHR 1.40, p = 0.009). Limitations of the study include retrospective design.

There are many treatment options available for men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Yet, biomarkers predictive of differential response to treatment are currently unavailable. A recent translational study suggested that SLCO2B1 genotype could predict response to abiraterone acetate for men with advanced prostate cancer. Here, we investigate whether germline variants in SLCO2B1 are predictive of response to first-line abiraterone acetate in men with new mCRPC. Clinical data and samples were analyzed from a prospective prostate cancer registry at the University of Utah (Salt Lake City, UT). Genotyping was performed using the Illumina OmniExpress genotyping platform. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) on first-line abiraterone acetate in men with mCRPC. We performed a prespecified multivariate Cox regression analysis to assess the independent predictive value of rs12422149 and rs1789693 on PFS on abiraterone acetate. Of 401 men with advanced prostate cancer genotyped, 323 were homozygous wild-type for rs12422149 (80.5%), 74 were heterozygous (18.5%), and 4 were homozygous variant (1.0%). In a multivariate analysis of 79 men treated with first-line abiraterone acetate for mCRPC, men heterozygous for rs12422149 had significantly improved median PFS compared with the homozygous wild-type group (8.9 months vs. 6.3 months; HR, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.23–0.94; P = 0.03). No significant difference in median PFS was seen by rs1789693 genotype. In this first clinical validation of translational data reported by Mostaghel and colleagues, germline variant alleles in rs12422149 of SLCO2B1 are common and predict improved response to first-line abiraterone acetate in men with mCRPC.

Given the underrepresentation of older patients in registration trials for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), data to support the use of any particular systemic therapy over others, based on age, is limited. This is further complicated by clinical trials not commonly reporting adverse events by age. Thus, recommendations on treatment of older patients with mRCC are generally extrapolated from data on younger patients enrolled in these trials, which may not be ideal as many older patients are frail, have age-related organ dysfunction, or have multiple medical co-morbidities. In the last decade, the treatment landscape for mRCC has drastically changed with the approval of more than ten targeted therapies, as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors. Thus, treatment selection and sequencing of treatments can be especially challenging for clinicians. We begin this review by analyzing the available efficacy and toxicity data of these treatments in younger and older patients. We also discuss a network meta-analysis that compares the efficacy of these agents in older patients with mRCC. Utilizing this data, we suggest that nivolumab plus ipilimumab and cabozantinib may be favored for first-line treatment of specific populations of older patients. For salvage treatment, we suggest that cabozantinib may be the preferred agent for older patients.

Historically, tumor biopsies and clinical laboratory testing have been the gold standard for diagnosis and prognosis in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Genomic profiling in mRCC has traditionally been performed on tumor tissue; however, challenges and limitations in obtaining tissue biopsies led to the discovery of alternative biological specimens, namely circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA). Rapidly evolving technologies, with increased sensitivity and specificity, have been used to query cfDNA in the clinical research setting. These investigations are rapidly establishing cfDNA and liquid biopsies as valuable complementary specimens to the gold standard, and in some instances surpassing these with unique insight into the contemporary genomic landscape and tumor heterogeneity. In this review, we will discuss recent research into the prognostic, diagnostic, and predictive utility of liquid biopsies in mRCC. We will explore their potential role in precision treatment of mRCC and conclude with what is needed in order to translate them to clinical practice.

Over the past few decades, the classification system of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) variants has witnessed tremendous and ongoing refinement driven by genomic profiling and morphological correlation that have provided valuable insights into tumor biology and characterization of this heterogeneous subset of tumors. The importance of accurate classification cannot be understated given the downstream impact on treatment decisions, risk stratification, and need for genetic testing. While the morphologic heterogeneity across these tumors is increasingly being recognized, all non-clear-cell RCCs are commonly categorized under one therapeutic category with management strategies that largely derive from clear-cell RCCs. As research in metastatic RCC progresses, there is a growing focus on rare subtypes and unclassified tumors, which is rapidly changing the treatment paradigm for non-clear-cell RCC. This review focuses on the histomorphologic diagnostic challenges of unclassified RCCs discussing the utility of contemporary diagnostic tools. It further discusses the current state of knowledge and guidelines for management of this class of tumors.

Lessons Learned Background Previously, we showed the combination of radium-223 and enzalutamide to be safe and associated with improved efficacy based on a concomitant decline in serum bone metabolism markers compared with enzalutamide alone in a phase II trial of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) [1]. Methods Secondary endpoints were not included in our initial report, and we include them herein, after a median follow-up of 22 months. These objectives included long-term safety, prostate-specific antigen (PSA)–progression-free survival (PFS), and radiographic progression-free survival; PSA-PFS2 (time from start of protocol therapy to PSA progression on subsequent therapy); time to next therapy (TTNT); and overall survival (OS). Survival analysis and log-rank tests were performed using the R statistical package v.4.0.2 (https://www.r-project.org). Statistical significance was defined as p Results Of 47 patients (median age, 68 years), 35 received the combination and 12 enzalutamide alone. After a median follow-up of 22 months, final safety results did not show any increase in fractures or other adverse events in the combination arm. PSA-PFS2 was significantly improved, and other efficacy parameters were numerically improved in the combination over the enzalutamide arm. Conclusion The combination of enzalutamide and radium-223 was found to be safe and associated with promising efficacy in men with mCRPC. These hypothesis-generating results portend well for the ongoing phase III PEACE III trial in this setting.

Purpose Progression from metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) to a castration-resistant (mCRPC) state heralds the lethal phenotype of prostate cancer. Identifying genomic alterations associated with mCRPC may help find new targets for drug development. In the majority of patients, obtaining a tumor biopsy is challenging because of the predominance of bone-only metastasis. In this study, we hypothesize that machine learning (ML) algorithms can identify clinically relevant patterns of genomic alterations (GAs) that distinguish mCRPC from mCSPC, as assessed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA). Experimental Design Retrospective clinical data from men with metastatic prostate cancer were collected. Men with NGS of cfDNA performed at a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)-certified laboratory at time of diagnosis of mCSPC or mCRPC were included. A combination of supervised and unsupervised ML algorithms was used to obtain biologically interpretable, potentially actionable insights into genomic signatures that distinguish mCRPC from mCSPC. Results GAs that distinguish patients with mCRPC (n = 187) from patients with mCSPC (n = 154) (positive predictive value = 94%, specificity = 91%) were identified using supervised ML algorithms. These GAs, primarily amplifications, corresponded to androgen receptor, Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling, Phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) signaling, G1/S cell cycle, and receptor tyrosine kinases. We also identified recurrent patterns of gene- and pathway-level alterations associated with mCRPC by using Bayesian networks, an unsupervised machine learning algorithm. Conclusion These results provide clinical evidence that progression from mCSPC to mCRPC is associated with stereotyped concomitant gain-of-function aberrations in these pathways. Furthermore, detection of these aberrations in cfDNA may overcome the challenges associated with obtaining tumor bone biopsies and allow contemporary investigation of combinatorial therapies that target these aberrations. Implications for Practice The progression from castration-sensitive to castration-resistant prostate cancer is characterized by worse prognosis and there is a pressing need for targeted drugs to prevent or delay this transition. This study used machine learning algorithms to examine the cell-free DNA of patients to identify alterations to specific pathways and genes associated with progression. Detection of these alterations in cell-free DNA may overcome the challenges associated with obtaining tumor bone biopsies and allow contemporary investigation of combinatorial therapies that target these aberrations.

Purpose: The role of circulating cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) as an adjunct to tissue genomic profiling is poorly defined in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). In this study, we aim to validate previous findings related to genomic alteration (GA) frequency in ctDNA and determine the concordance between ctDNA and tissue-based profiling in patients with mRCC. Experimental Design: Results of 839 patients with mRCC who had ctDNA assessment with a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)-certified ctDNA assay between November 2016 and December 2019 were collected. Tissue-based genomic profiling was collected when available and concordance analysis between blood- and tissue-based testing was performed. Results: ctDNA was assessed in 839 patients (comprising 920 samples) with mRCC. GAs were detected in 661 samples (71.8%). Tissue-based GAs were assessed in 112 patients. Limiting our analyses to a common 73-/74-gene set and excluding samples with no ctDNA detected, a total of 228 mutations were found in tissue and blood. Mutations identified in tissue (34.7%; 42/121) were also identified via ctDNA, whereas 28.2% (42/149) of the mutations identified in liquid were also identified via tissue. Concordance between ctDNA and tissue-based profiling was inversely related to the time elapsed between these assays. Conclusions: This study confirms the feasibility of ctDNA profiling in the largest mRCC cohort to date, with ctDNA identifying multiple actionable alterations. It also demonstrates that ctDNA and tissue-based genomic profiling are complementary, with both platforms identifying unique alterations, and confirms that the frequency of unique alterations increases with greater temporal separation between tests.

PURPOSE Germline mutations in DNA repair (DR) genes and susceptibility genes CDKN2A and HOXB13 have previously been associated with prostate cancer (PC) incidence and/or progression. However, the role and prevalence of this class of mutations in metastatic PC (mPC) are not fully understood. PATIENTS AND METHODS To evaluate the frequency of pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variants (PVs/LPVs) in men with mPC, this study sequenced 38 DR genes, CDKN2A, and HOXB13 in a predominantly white cohort of 317 patients with mPC. A PC registry at the University of Utah was used for patient sample acquisition and retrospective clinical data collection. Deep target sequencing allowed for germline and copy number variant analyses. Validated PVs/LPVs were integrated with clinical and demographic data for statistical correlation analyses. RESULTS All pathogenic variants were found in men self-reported as white, with a carrier frequency of 8.5% (DR genes, 7.3%; CDKN2A/ HOXB13, 1.2%). Consistent with previous reports, mutations were most frequently identified in the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2. It was also found that 50% of identified PVs/LPVs were categorized as founder mutations with European origins. Correlation analyses did not support a trend toward more advanced or earlier-onset disease in comparisons between carriers and noncarriers of deleterious DR or HOXB13 G84E mutations. CONCLUSION These findings demonstrate a lower prevalence of germline PVs/LPVs in an unselected, predominantly white mPC cohort than previously reported, which may have implications for the design of clinical trials testing targeted therapies. Larger studies in broad and diverse populations are needed to more accurately define the prevalence of germline mutations in men with mPC.

Background: First-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has incrementally evolved over the past decade. Most recently, promising clinical trials for first-line cabozantinib, nivolumab plus ipilimumab, and bevacizumab plus atezolizumab were reported. However, the comparator arm in all of these trials was sunitinib, so no head-to-head comparison exists for contemporary first-line treatments. Objective: To provide an indirect comparison of first-line treatments for mRCC that are currently approved or likely soon to be approved. Methods: Pivotal phase 2/3 clinical trials comparing currently approved first-line agents and novel regimens of nivolumab plus ipilimumab and bevacizumab plus atezolizumab were included if they reported overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), or objective response rate (ORR). Network meta-analysis of OS, PFS, and ORR was conducted in the context of Bayesian hierarchical log-linear models with both within and between study variance components. Results: For OS, evidence suggests nivolumab plus ipilimumab may be the best first-line treatment available for mRCC (probability best 52%). In contrast, cabozantinib may be superior to other first-line treatments for PFS (probability best 69%) and ORR (probability best 95%). Conclusion: For first-line treatment of mRCC, cabozantinib appears superior to other agents for PFS and ORR, whereas, nivolumab plus ipilimumab may be the best treatment for OS. No single agent was superior to comparators across all endpoints. First-line treatment for mRCC should be tailored to individual cases based on the unique characteristics of each treatment regimen.

Background Antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome (AAWS), manifested as a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline after discontinuation of a first-generation antiandrogen has been well characterized. The objective of the present study was to assess the incidence of AAWS with enzalutamide in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Patients and Methods Patients from a single-institution cohort with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who had discontinued enzalutamide after PSA or radiographic progression were included. AAWS after enzalutamide was defined as any PSA decline after discontinuation of enzalutamide. The baseline patient, disease, and treatment characteristics were compared between patients with and without AAWS after enzalutamide. Statistical analysis of the baseline characteristics included descriptive statistics using the Wilcoxon rank sum test and the Fisher exact test. The median duration of enzalutamide therapy was compared using the log-rank test, and the progression-free survival of the patients with AAWS was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results Of 47 eligible patients, 5 experienced AAWS after enzalutamide discontinuation. The PSA response in these 5 patients was 84%, 32%, 17%, 15%, and 15%. The median AAWS response time until subsequent PSA progression was 3.3 months. No patient, disease, or treatment characteristics differed among the patients with and without AAWS after enzalutamide discontinuation. Conclusion To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest reported cohort documenting the incidence and characterization of AAWS after enzalutamide to date. The AAWS frequency after enzalutamide was low and of short duration. No patient- or disease-related characteristics were associated with AAWS with enzalutamide. The occurrence of AAWS after enzalutamide was not clinically meaningful. Thus, accounting for this phenomenon in clinical practice or trial designs could be unnecessary.

In the original version of [this article][1] ([1][2]), the wrong files were supplied for Figs. 5B and C. The figures and related article text have been corrected in the latest online HTML and PDF versions of this article. The authors regret these errors. 1. 1.[↵][3]1. Cowman SJ, 2. Fuja

5058 Background: Emerging data suggest differences in the tumor genomic profile of AA compared with CA men with aPC. We hypothesized that there will be significant differences in the tumor genomic landscape between AA and Ca pts as detected by cfDNA CGP. Methods: Pts with aPC and available cfDNA CGP by the Guardant (G360) 73 gene panel were included. In addition, G360 74 gene panel was used to identify CDK12 mutation (not detected in 73 gene panel) in an independent cohort of aPC pts. Barnard’s test was used to evaluate the association between genetic mutation and gene. Genomic landscape was also compared by a Bayesian Network (BN) machine learning approach. Results: A total of 552 pts (125 AA, 427 CA) tested by G360 73 gene panel were included. Multiple genomic aberrations were enriched in AA patients (Table). In the independent cohort of 261 aPC patients (AA=106 pts, CA=155 pts) tested by G360 74 gene panel, CDK12 mutation was significant enriched in AA pts. (9.4% vs. 1.9%, p=0.006). Machine learning analysis supported these results, and will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: These hypothesis generating data suggest significant differences in the tumor genomic profile between AA and CA pts with aPC. Identification of molecular drivers of tumor progression enriched in AA pts may allow development of tailored systemic therapy for these men, and decrease disparities in disease related outcomes. Data need external validation. PB,RR,MAB contributed equally to this work.[Table: see text]

4555 Background: Inactivation of VHL leads to aberrant stabilization and accumulation of HIF-2α, which drives tumor growth. Patients (pts) with VHL disease are at risk for ccRCC, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs), and hemangioblastomas. Repeated surgeries are often needed to control ccRCC and other VHL disease manifestations. Prior results of this ongoing open-label phase 2 study (NCT03401788) showed activity with belzutifan in VHL disease. Updated results are presented. Methods: Adults with germline VHL alterations, measurable and localized/nonmetastatic ccRCC, no prior systemic anticancer therapy, and ECOG PS 0 or 1 received belzutifan 120 mg once daily until progression, intolerable toxicity, or decision to withdraw. The primary end point is ORR of VHL-associated ccRCC tumors per RECIST v1.1 by independent review committee (IRC). Secondary end points include DOR, time to response (TTR), PFS, and safety. Results: As of June 1, 2020, 61 pts enrolled. Most pts (82%) had ECOG PS 0, and the median number of prior tumor reduction procedures (eg, partial nephrectomy, craniotomy, radiation therapy) per pt was 5 (range, 0-15). Lesions outside the kidney (non-RCC tumors) evaluable by IRC included pNETs (33%) and CNS hemangioblastomas (82%). Median follow-up was 69 wk (range, 18-105), median duration of treatment was 68 wk (range, 8-105), and 56 pts (92%) remain on therapy. There were 22 confirmed responses (ORR, 36% [95% CI, 24-49]) and 7 (11%) unconfirmed responses (documented at 1 time point, to be confirmed at subsequent time point); all were PRs. In pts with confirmed PR, median DOR was not reached (range, 12+ to 62+ wk), median TTR was 31 wk (range, 12-61), and 56 pts (92%) had some reduction in the sum of all target lesion diameters. PFS rate at 52 wk was 98% (95% CI, 89-100). For non-RCC tumors, ORR was 80% (16/20; 1 CR) in pNETs and 32% (16/50; 1 CR) in CNS hemangioblastomas. Of 16 pts with evaluable retinal hemangioblastomas at baseline, 11 (69%) showed improvement per IRC. In those 16 pts, 29 eyes were monitored for retinal hemangioblastomas: 16 eyes (55%) showed improvement, 12 (41%) were stable, and no evaluation was available for 1 eye (3%). All 61 pts (100%) had at least one AE. The most common all-cause AE was anemia (90%), which is considered an on-target toxicity. Treatment-related AEs (TRAE) were reported by 60 pts (98%), and 8 pts (13%) had a grade 3 TRAE. No pts had grade 4/5 TRAEs. One pt discontinued treatment because of a TRAE (grade 1 dizziness). Conclusions: Belzutifan demonstrates clinical benefit and has a favorable safety profile in patients with VHL disease–associated ccRCC, pNETs, and hemangioblastomas. Clinical trial information: NCT03401788.

4580 Background: Despite advances in the treatment of clear cell RCC, there is a paucity of data to guide management of nccRCC due to the heterogeneity and rarity of these tumors. The clinical activity of new combination therapies (including immunotherapy (IO), anti-vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (VEGF), and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors) in metastatic nccRCC is not known. Methods: In this multicenter retrospective analysis, we explored the efficacy of combination systemic therapies in patients with nccRCC. Baseline and follow-up demographic, clinical, treatment, and radiographic data were collected. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) assessed by investigator review. Secondary endpoints include progression- free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), median duration of response (DOR), overall survival (OS), and biomarker correlates. Results: Among 66 included patients, median age was 59 yr; 60% were male and 62% white. Histologies included papillary (38%), chromophobe (17%), unclassified (24%), translocation (12%), and other (9 %). Sarcomatoid and/or rhabdoid differentiation was present in 18%, 70% had prior nephrectomy, 86% were IMDC intermediate/poor risk, 29% and 32% had liver and bone metastasis respectively. 67% received combination treatment in the first line. Comparison of outcomes based on treatment regimen is shown in the table. Conclusions: Antitumor activity was observed with novel combinations in nccRCC which warrants further prospective studies. Response rates and survival with combination therapy in this dataset remain inferior to rates seen in clear cell RCC.[Table: see text]

Background Statins compete with DHEAS for influx through the SLCO2B1 transporter, which may prolong time to progression (TTP) on androgen deprivation therapy. Abiraterone acetate (AA) may also undergo SLCO-mediated transport. Based on preclinical findings showing antagonism, we hypothesized that statins may compete with AA for influx via SLCO2B1 and could negatively impact drug efficacy. Methods We queried two institutional clinical databases (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute [DFCI], Johns Hopkins University [JHU]) for CRPC patients treated with AA. Treatment duration was a surrogate for TTP. Associations between statin use and AA duration were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable Cox regression modeling adjusted for known prognostic factors. Results Of the 224 DFCI and 270 JHU patients included, the majority (96%) had metastatic disease. Nearly half (41% and 45%) were statin users. In the DFCI cohort, there was a trend toward longer AA duration in statin users: 14.2 versus 9.2 months (HR 0.79, 95%CI: 0.57-1.09, P = 0.14). There was no association between statin use and AA duration in the JHU cohort: 8.3 versus 8.0 months (HR 0.89, 95%CI: 0.69-1.16, P = 0.38) in the statin users versus non-users, except for a trend in patients that had not previously received docetaxel or enzalutamide (HR 0.79; 95%CI: 0.57-1.10). Conclusions Contrary to our initial hypothesis, there was a trend toward longer (rather than shorter) AA duration in statin users in the entire DFCI cohort and in the enzalutamide- and docetaxel-naive JHU patients. Together, these results do not support the hypothesis that statins interfere with AA efficacy.

Objectives To evaluate and compare the efficacy of sequential treatment with abiraterone followed by enzalutamide or vice versa for castration-resistant prostate cancer. Methods We retrospectively evaluated data on 198 consecutive chemotherapy-naive patients who had received both abiraterone and enzalutamide for castration-resistant prostate cancer at Kyoto University Hospital (including satellite hospitals) and at Johns Hopkins Cancer Center. Prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival and overall survival in patients treated with sequential abiraterone-to-enzalutamide versus enzalutamide-to-abiraterone without intervening therapies were compared. Results Overall, 113 patients were treated with the abiraterone-to-enzalutamide sequence and 85 with the enzalutamide-to-abiraterone sequence. Median prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival was not significantly different between abiraterone and enzalutamide in the first-line setting (hazard ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.66–1.19, P = 0.412), but there was an advantage favoring enzalutamide compared with abiraterone in the second-line setting (hazard ratio 0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.49–0.91, P = 0.009). Furthermore, the combined prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival was significantly longer in the abiraterone-to-enzalutamide sequence than in the enzalutamide-to-abiraterone sequence (hazard ratio 0.56, 95% confidence interval 0.41–0.76, P

// Andrew W. Hahn 1 , David M. Gill 1 , Benjamin Maughan 2 , Archana Agarwal 3 , Lubina Arjyal 2 , Sumati Gupta 2 , Jessica Streeter 4 , Erin Bailey 4 , Sumanta K. Pal 5 , Neeraj Agarwal 2 1 Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA 2 Division of Medical Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA 3 Department of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA 4 Department of Pharmacy, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA 5 Department of Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA Correspondence to: Neeraj Agarwal, email: neeraj.agarwal@hci.utah.edu Keywords: circulating tumor DNA NGS, tumor tissue NGS, correlation, metastatic renal cell carcinoma Received: January 25, 2017 Accepted: March 25, 2017 Published: April 04, 2017 ABSTRACT Introduction: Tumor tissue and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing are frequently performed to detect genomic alterations (GAs) to help guide treatment in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), especially after progression on standard systemic therapy. Our objective was to assess if GAs detected by ctDNA NGS are different from those detected by tumor tissue NGS, specifically in patients with mRCC, and if these platforms are interchangeable or complimentary. Results: When controlling for genes tested by both platforms, the median mutation rate for ctDNA was similar to tissue (median 3.0 vs. 1.0, p = 0.14). However, the concordance rate between the two platforms was only 8.6%. When comparing GAs by molecular pathway, GAs in tumor tissue were more common for the DNA repair and epigenetic pathways. Materials and Methods: Results of NGS testing from tumor tissue and ctDNA from 19 sequential mRCC patients were compared. GAs in each were statistically evaluated using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The Fischer’s exact test was used to compare the incidence of mutations in selected molecular pathways. Conclusions: When controlling for genes tested by both platforms, similar number of GAs were detected by both tissue and ctDNA based NGS. However, there was discordance in the type of GAs detected suggesting that ctDNA NGS may be more reflective of dynamic tumor genomic heterogeneity. Hence, these two platforms may be considered complementary to each other, rather than interchangeable, for assessment of tumor GAs to guide selection of targeted clinical trial therapies.

Purpose Hand-foot syndrome is a common dose limiting toxicity of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors used for treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The effect of treatment dose reductions, in the context of hand-foot syndrome, on survival outcomes is reported. Methods This was a retrospective case series of patients receiving vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors from 1 January 2004 to 31 October 2013. The main outcomes were progression-free and overall survival in these patients experiencing hand-foot syndrome and undergoing treatment dose reductions. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted utilizing Kaplan-Meier method and COX Proportional Hazard model with landmark analyses at 2 months. Results Of the 120 patients evaluated, treatment dose reductions for any reason were required in 68 (56.7%) patients. The most common reasons for treatment dose reductions were mucositis, hand-foot syndrome, and fatigue. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were significantly longer in patients with hand-foot syndrome with or without treatment dose reductions as compared to those without hand-foot syndrome. Conclusions An improvement in survival outcomes was observed in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients with treatment-associated hand-foot syndrome despite treatment dose reductions. These data need validation in a larger cohort to confirm the hypothesis that treatment dose reductions in the setting of hand-foot syndrome do not negatively impatient survival.

The optimal treatment sequences to maximize the clinical benefit for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have not been defined. A new prospective, randomized trial on optimal sequencing of enzalutamide and abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in mCRPC investigated whether one regimen resulted in superior outcomes.

Lessons Learned HyperAcute Renal immunotherapy was well tolerated and demonstrated antitumor activity in patients requiring salvage-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). HyperAcute Renal immunotherapy was safely administered with concomitant salvage-line treatments for mRCC, and it may be a candidate for inclusion in novel combinations for salvage treatment of mRCC because of its unique mechanism of action. Background HyperAcute Renal (HAR) immunotherapy exploits a naturally occurring barrier to xenotransplantation and zoonotic infections in humans to immunize patients against metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) cells. HAR consists of two allogeneic renal cancer cell lines genetically modified to express α(1,3)Gal, to which humans have an inherent pre-existing immunity. Methods Patients with refractory mRCC were eligible for this phase I dose-escalation trial. Concomitant treatment was permitted after the initial 2 months of HAR monotherapy. HAR was injected intradermally weekly for 4 weeks then biweekly for 20 weeks, totaling 14 immunizations. The primary endpoint was safety and determination of a maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Results Among 18 patients enrolled, two grade 3 adverse events (AEs) were attributed to HAR, lymphopenia and injection site reaction, and no grade 4/5 AEs occurred. The recommended phase II dose (RP2D) was 300 million cells. One patient had a partial response and eight patients had stable disease, for a disease control rate of 50% (9/18). Median overall survival with low-dose HAR was 14.2 months and was 25.3 months with high-dose HAR. Conclusion In pretreated mRCC, HAR immunotherapy was well tolerated and demonstrated antitumor activity. HAR immunotherapy may be a candidate for inclusion in novel combinations for salvage treatment of mRCC.

Nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) comprises a relatively narrow niche of advanced prostate cancer, but the treatment landscape for men with nmCRPC has drastically changed over the past year. Prior to the SPARTAN and PROSPER trials, men with nmCRPC were commonly treated with first-generation androgen receptor antagonists, such as bicalutamide or flutamide, or with estrogens or ketoconazole, none of which were associated with any proven survival benefit. The SPARTAN trial evaluated apalutamide versus placebo for men with nmCRPC and found that apalutamide significantly improved metastasis-free survival (MFS), the primary endpoint of this trial. Similarly, the PROSPER trial showed that enzalutamide significantly improved MFS compared with placebo for men with nmCRPC. In both trials, the data for overall survival was immature at the time of analysis. The SPARTAN and PROSPER trials led to the approval of apalutamide and enzalutamide, respectively, for men with nmCRPC. More recently, the phase 3 trial ARAMIS showed that darolutamide, a novel androgen receptor antagonist, also improves MFS compared with placebo for men with nmCRPC, and this trial is expected to garner regulatory approval for darolutamide in the nmCRPC setting. Novel imaging modalities are becoming more prevalent for the diagnostic evaluation of men with prostate cancer and are more sensitive than conventional bone or CT scans for detection of oligometastatic disease that previously was undetected. These modalities are likely to reduce the incidence and prevalence of nmCRPC in the near future. Ultimately, the treatment options for men with nmCRPC have significantly improved over the past 2 years.

Background First-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is rapidly changing. It currently includes VEGF targeted therapies (TT), multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), mTOR inhibitors, and immunotherapy. To optimize outcomes for individual patients, genomic markers of response to therapy are needed. Here, we aim to identify tumor-based genomic markers of response to VEGF TT to optimize treatment selection. Methods From an institutional database, primary tumor tissue was obtained from 79 patients with clear cell mRCC, and targeted sequencing was performed. Clinical outcomes were obtained retrospectively. Progression-free survival (PFS) on first-line VEGF TT was correlated to genomic alterations (GAs) using Kaplan-Meier methodology and Cox proportional hazard models. A composite model of significant GAs predicting PFS in the first-line setting was developed. Results Absence of VHL mutation was associated with inferior PFS on first-line VEGF TT. A trend for inferior PFS was observed with GAs in TP53 and FLT1 C/C variant. A composite model of these 3 GAs was associated with inferior PFS in a dose-dependent manner. Conclusion In mRCC, a composite model of TP53 mutation, wild type VHL, and FLT1 C/C variant strongly predicted PFS on first-line VEGF TT in a dose-dependent manner. These findings require external validation.

Background Targeted therapies have shown promise for men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Due to the difficulty with obtaining tumor tissue in bony metastases, liquid biopsies are a promising alternative to guide treatment selection. While concurrent tissue next-generation sequencing (tNGS) and liquid biopsy has high concordance, it is unknown whether the genomic landscape of metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) changes over time or treatment. Herein, we hypothesize that the genomic landscape of mPC evolves with new treatments and/or time between tests. Patients and Methods Men with mPC from the University of Utah with matched tNGS and liquid biopsy were included. Clinical data was collected retrospectively. Exonic regions from 69 genes covered by both platforms were included for analysis. Paired t tests were used to assess number of genomic alterations (GAs) between testing platforms. Number of alterations was assessed by time and number of treatments between testing by multivariate nonparametric trend tests. Results 101 men with mPC were eligible and included. In men with no new treatments and ≤ 1 year between tests, a similar number of GAs were detected in both tests (2.0 vs. 2.2). In contrast, men with ≥ 1 new treatment between tests had significantly more GAs after treatment (5.0 vs. 2.4, p = 0.005). Total number of GAs was correlated with number of new treatments between testing (p = 0.003) and not time between testing (p = 0.76). Conclusion The genomic landscape of mPC evolves with subsequent therapies. This finding suggests that contemporary tumor genomic profile upon disease progression may optimize guidance towards subsequent therapy selection.

Background Sipuleucel-T is an autologous cellular immunotherapy indicated for patients with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Since radiation therapy (RT) can suppress bone marrow function and immune responses, previous studies evaluating sipuleucel-T excluded patients who received RT less than or equal to 28 days prior to sipuleucel-T therapy. Recent evidence suggests that RT may act synergistically with immunotherapy to enhance and broaden antitumor immune response. Methods Patients who met standard criteria for sipuleucel-T were randomized to receive sipuleucel-T alone (Arm A) or sipuleucel-T initiated 1 week after completing sensitizing RT to single metastatic site (Arm B). RT was delivered at 300cGy/day to 3000 cGy total. The primary endpoint was the ability to safely combine sipuleucel-T preceded by RT and generate sipuleucel-T with adequate product immune activation parameters. Secondary endpoints included the measurement of systemic immune responses to prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP), a target for sipuleucel-T immune therapy and PA20204 (recombinant fusion protein utilized in the generation of sipuleucel-T). Results 51 pts were enrolled, 2 did not receive any sipuleucel-T because of vascular access problems and were excluded. 24 were treated on Arm A, 25 on Arm B. 47/49 patients received all 3 sipuleucel-T infusions. Median age was 66 yrs (range 45–90). Sipuleucel-T product parameters including: total nucleated cell (TNC) count, antigen presenting cell (APC) count were similar in both groups. Cumulative APC upregulation was higher in Arm A. 1 patient in Arm A demonstrated PSA response. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 2.46 months on Arm A and 3.65 months on Arm B (p = 0.06). Both arms showed similar increases in humoral responses to PA2024 and PAP. IFN-ƴ ELISPOT T-cell activation responses to PA20204 were observed in both arms, but were more robust in the Arm A (p = 0.028). Both arms were well-tolerated, with fatigue as the most common grade 2 adverse event (1 patient in Arm A and 3 patients in Arm B). Conclusions Sensitizing RT completed 1 week before generation of sipuleucel-T did not affect the majority of product parameters and the ability to deliver sipuleucel-T therapy. RT did not enhance the humoral and cellular responses associated with sipuleucel-T therapy.

156 Background: AA have substantially higher prostate cancer incidence rates, are diagnosed at a younger age and with a more advanced stage as compared to Ca. However, after adjusting for known prognostic factors, AA have an increased overall survival. We hypothesized that these differences might be due to the underlying changes in the genomic landscape which can be revealed by liquid biopsy. Methods: Real world comprehensive genomic profiling of ctDNA from aPCa patients from two institutions. The first ctDNA results as reported by Guardant 360 panel (Redwood City, CA) were included. Association between genetic mutation and gene were tested using Barnard’s test. To account for multiple testing, we used Benjamini-Hochberg’s False Discovery Rate adjustment across all tests to determine thresholds for false discovery rates. Same analysis was performed using a Bayesian Network Machine learning approach. Results: Overall, 361 patients with aPCa (81 AA and 280 Ca) were included in the analysis. Pathogenic genomic alterations were found in 87.0% of the cases, more frequently TP53 (42.4%), AR (34.1%), PIK3CA (13.9%), BRAF (12.7%), NF1 (10.8%) and MYC (10.0%). Targetable alterations of interest included DNA repair genes [BRCA 2 (7.8%), BRCA 1 (4.4%), ATM (6.4%), CDK12 (2.2%)], PIK3CA/mTOR/AKT (19.1%), PTEN (3.3%) and NTRK (1.9%). MSI-high was found in 4 patients. AA as compared to Ca had a significantly higher prevalence of CDK12 (20.7% vs. 3.8%, p=0.016) and GNA11 mutations (3.7% vs. 0.4%, p=0.0225). BayesNet analysis also supported these results (table). Conclusions: In this dataset, liquid biopsy of ctDNA was useful for genetic characterization of aPCa and reveal differences in the molecular phenotype of AA and Ca in aPCa with potential clinical implications. These findings support ongoing research on the clinical utility of non-invasive genotyping and therapeutic response monitoring with a focus on AA population. [Table: see text]

334 Background: Immune therapy combinations are now standard first-line therapy for pts with mccRCC. Cabo modulates key components of the immune system such as decreasing regulatory T-cells and increasing T-effector cell populations and is approved for treatment of mRCC. We hypothesize that Ave + Cabo will be safe and show clinical activity in mccRCC. Methods: Prospective phase I clinical trial using a 3+3 design with three planned dose cohorts: Cabo 20mg/day, 40mg/day and 60mg/day + Ave (10mg/kg q2weeks) in each arm. The primary endpoint was safety and identification of the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Key secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR) and radiographic progression free survival (PFS). No dose modifications were allowed for Ave but dose delays were permitted. Dose reductions were allowed for Cabo. There were an additional 3 patients included in the final dose cohort as a confirmation of the RP2D. RECIST 1.1 was used to determine ORR. Treatment beyond progression was allowed. Results: Twelve patients with newly diagnosed mccRCC were enrolled from 08/2018 through 03/2020. Three patients were enrolled into the 20 and 40mg cohorts each, six patients enrolled in the 60mg cohort. IMDC risk: favorable 4 patients, intermediate 6 patients, poor 2 patients. No dose limiting toxicities were observed in any cohort. Only one SAE related to study treatment was observed, thromboembolism, after the DLT period. Immune related adverse events (irAE) occurred in six patients (50%) and included hypothyroidism, colitis, nephritis, allergic rhinitis and rash. Six patients required dose reductions of cabozantinib after the DLT period: one in the 40mg cohort and five in 60mg cohort, most frequently due to oral mucositis and hand foot syndrome. One patient discontinued Ave due to irAE (nephritis). No patients discontinued Cabo due to toxicity. The ORR was 33% (all PR). The clinical benefit rate (CR+PR+SD) was ~ 92%. One patient experienced PD on the first scan and then continued on the protocol treatment without further progression at the time of this report (follow up to date ~ 7 months). Seven of 12 pts are still on protocol treatment. Conclusions: Ave + Cabo in mccRCC is safe and preliminarily efficacious. Even though the DLT was not met in any of the cohorts, based on dose reduction required in 5 of 6 pts in the Cabo 60 mg cohort after the DLT period, the recommended RP2D dose for the combination is Cabo 40mg/day and Ave 10mg/kg q2 weeks. Safety and efficacy data will be elaborated in the meeting. * NA & BLM: equal contribution Clinical trial information: NCT03200587 .

135 Background: We previously reported that treatment with EZ+RA was associated with a decline in serum bone metabolism markers (BMM), which correlated with improved outcomes compared to EZ alone (Agarwal N et al, Clinical Cancer Research, 2020, PMID 31937614). Here we report the final efficacy and safety results for this trial. Methods: In this phase 2 trial (NCT02199197), patients (pts) with progressive mCRPC were treated with EZ (160 mg daily) ±RA (standard dose of 55 kBq/kg IV Q4 weeks x 6), until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. Primary objectives of change in bone markers and safety have been reported previously. Secondary objectives included comparison of PSA progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and long term safety in all pts receiving RA+EZ vs EZ alone. Post hoc analysis included comparison of PSA-PFS2 (defined as time from start of protocol therapy to PSA progression on subsequent therapy or death whichever occurred earlier), time to subsequent/next therapy (TTNT), and long term safety. Survival analysis and log-rank tests was performed using the R statistical package v.4.0.2 ( https://www.r-project.org ). Statistical significance was defined as P

347 Background: We have previously demonstrated the feasibility of ctDNA assessment in mRCC and preliminarily showed agreement between ctDNA and tissue-based genomic findings (Zengin et al ESMO 2020). Our data suggested that the degree of agreement is dependent upon the temporal separation of blood and tissue samples. We sought to further explore this temporal impact in a separate validation cohort. Methods: Patients (pts) with mRCC who underwent ctDNA genomic profiling were identified. ctDNA analysis was performed using a CLIA-certified 73-74 gene panel (Guardant360). From this cohort we identified a subset of pts who also underwent tissue-based genomic profiling using either a whole exome sequencing platform (GemExtra [TGen, Phoenix, AZ]) or a targeted next generation sequencing platform (Foundation Medicine [Cambridge, MA] or Tempus [Chicago, IL]). Only alterations covered by both assays were included for the current analysis. The difference in the proportion of alterations detected on tissue and ctDNA was compared between these cohorts and at a 6-mo landmark using the χ2 test. Results: In total, ctDNA and tissue based genomic profiling was assessed in 112 pts (M:F, 81:31); with most common histology was clear cell (85.7%). Median time between ctDNA and tissue assessments was 9.8 months (IQR 1.15-23.7). When examining paired samples in which >1 ctDNA alteration was detected, 32% (43/133) of alterations detected on tissue were also detected in ctDNA. This proportion increased to 43% (29/67) when samples collected within 6 months of each other, and was 51% (28/55) in samples collected within 3 months of each other. There was no significant difference in the frequency of shared mutations between the cohorts (P=0.09; Table). Conclusions: Our study confirms that ctDNA and tissue-based genomic profiling continue to provide consistently high levels of agreement. Notably, the percentage of samples with ≥1 ctDNA alteration detected was significantly lower in both cohorts compared to previous studies in RCC. More shared alterations were found on ctDNA when both ctDNA and tissue-based assessment were obtained at closer intervals. [Table: see text]

333 Background: Patients (pts) with VHL disease are at risk of developing benign and malignant tumors, including ccRCC, pancreatic lesions tumors, CNS hemangioblastomas, and retinal lesions. Inactivation of VHL leads to stabilization of HIF-2α, which drives tumor growth. In a phase 1/2 study, MK-6482, a potent, selective, oral small molecule HIF-2α inhibitor, demonstrated favorable safety and antitumor activity in advanced ccRCC. We present results of the open-label phase 2 study of MK-6482 for VHL disease–associated ccRCC (NCT03401788). Methods: Adults with germline VHL alterations, measurable, localized/non-metastatic ccRCC, no prior systemic anticancer therapy, and ECOG PS 0/1 received MK-6482 120 mg once daily until progression, intolerable toxicity, or decision to withdraw. Primary end point: ORR of VHL-associated ccRCC tumors per RECIST v1.1 by independent review committee (IRC). Secondary end points: DOR, time to response (TTR), PFS, and safety. Results: As of June 1, 2020, 61 pts enrolled. The majority (82%) of pts had ECOG PS 0, and median number of prior surgeries per pt was 5 (range, 1-15). Lesions outside the kidney (non-RCC tumors) evaluable by IRC included pancreatic lesions (100%) and CNS hemangioblastomas (70%). Median duration of treatment was 68 wk (range, 8-105), and 92% of pts remain on therapy. There were 22 confirmed responses (ORR, 36% [95% CI, 24%-49%]) and 7 (11%) unconfirmed (documented at 1 time point, to be confirmed at subsequent time point) responses; all PRs. In pts with confirmed PR, median DOR was not reached (range, 12-62 wk) and median TTR was 31 wk (range, 12-61); 14 (64%) pts had response duration of ≥26 wk. 56 pts (92%) had any decrease in size of target lesions. PFS rate at 52 wk was 98% (95% CI, 89%-100%). Overall, pretreatment median linear growth rate of ccRCC tumors was +3.6 mm/y (range, −3.4 to +33.1), compared with −4.5 mm/y (range, −12.8 to +5.1) while on treatment. For non-RCC tumors, ORR in pancreatic lesions was 64% (39/61, including 4 CRs) and in CNS hemangioblastomas was 30% (13/43, including 5 CRs). Median (range) TTR was 35 wk (11-60) and 12 wk (10-60) for pancreatic lesions and CNS hemangioblastomas, respectively. 11/16 (69%) pts with evaluable retinal lesions at baseline showed improvement. Of those 16 pts, 29 eyes were followed for retinal lesions; 16 eyes (55%) showed improvement, 12 (41%) remained stable, and no follow-up evaluation was available for 1 (3%) eye. Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 98% of pts, none grade 4/5. Most common TRAE was anemia (87%), considered to be an on-target toxicity. One pt discontinued treatment due to a TRAE (grade 1 dizziness). As of data cutoff, 1 pt (2%) required surgery for ccRCC tumors after treatment. Conclusions: MK-6482 is an active and well-tolerated therapy for VHL disease–associated ccRCC, pancreatic lesions, as well as CNS and retinal hemangioblastomas. Clinical trial information: NCT03401788 .

BACKGROUND There are no validated clinical decision tools to aid optimal treatment selection in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Frequently, abiraterone and enzalutamide are used prior to chemotherapy in mCRPC, given the more favorable safety profiles. However, there is no published data on clinical outcomes regarding best sequencing of these two agents. METHODS A retrospective analysis of consecutive mCRPC patients treated with enzalutamide and abiraterone at Johns Hopkins was conducted. Patients were treated with sequential enzalutamide and abiraterone, in either order. The combined progression-free survival (PFS: PFS1 + PFS2) of abiraterone-to-enzalutamide was compared to the reverse sequence, where PFS1 and PFS2 represented clinical/radiographic progression-free survival on the first and second agents, respectively. Overall survival (OS) from the start of the first therapy to death and PSA response rates (defined as ≥50% PSA declines at any time) were also compared between groups. Outcomes were adjusted using propensity score-weighted multivariable Cox analyses. RESULTS Eighty-one patients who satisfied our entry criteria were identified: 65 in the abiraterone-to-enzalutamide group and 16 in the enzalutamide-to-abiraterone group. There were no significant baseline differences between groups. Multivariable analysis suggested a difference between groups favoring the abiraterone-to-enzalutamide sequence with respect to combined PFS (HR 0.37, 95%CI 0.22–0.64, P