1. Immunohistochemistry and alternative FISH testing in breast cancer with HER2 equivocal amplification
- Author
-
Sally Agersborg, Shiping Jiang, Robert Gasparini, Christopher Mixon, Gregory Hess, Sramila Aithal, Thanh Nguyen, Sucha Sudarsanam, Lawrence M. Weiss, Maher Albitar, Forrest Blocker, and Wayne Chen
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Oncology ,Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Receptor, ErbB-2 ,Breast Neoplasms ,Palbociclib ,Equivocal ,03 medical and health sciences ,Breast cancer ,0302 clinical medicine ,FISH ,HER2 ,Internal medicine ,Biomarkers, Tumor ,medicine ,Humans ,HER2 Amplification ,In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Significant difference ,Gene Amplification ,medicine.disease ,Clinical Trial ,Immunohistochemistry ,030104 developmental biology ,Receptors, Estrogen ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,%22">Fish ,Female ,Receptors, Progesterone ,business ,IHC ,Fluorescence in situ hybridization - Abstract
Purpose While HER2 testing is well established in directing appropriate treatment for breast cancer, a small percentage of cases show equivocal results by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Alternative probes may be used in equivocal cases. We present a single community-based institution’s experience in further evaluating these cases. Patients and methods Between 2014 and 2016, 4255 samples were submitted for HER2 amplification testing by alternative probes, TP53, RAI1, and RARA. Of the patients tested by FISH, 505/3908 (12.9%) also had IHC data. Results Most (73.9%) FISH equivocal cases remained equivocal after IHC testing. However, 50.5% of equivocal cases were classified as HER2 amplified by alternative probes. Most cases were positive by more than one probe: 78% of positive cases by RAI1 and 73.9% by TP53. There was a significant difference between IHC and FISH alternative testing (p
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF