Search

Background Elbasvir/grazoprevir is a once-daily fixed-dose combination therapy for the treatment of chronic HCV infection, including HCV/HIV coinfection. Objectives To evaluate the pharmacokinetic interaction of elbasvir and grazoprevir with raltegravir or dolutegravir. Methods Three open-label trials in healthy adult participants were conducted. In the raltegravir trials, participants received a single dose of raltegravir 400 mg, a single dose of elbasvir 50 mg or grazoprevir 200 mg, and raltegravir with either elbasvir or grazoprevir. In the dolutegravir trial, participants received a single dose of dolutegravir 50 mg alone or co-administered with once-daily elbasvir 50 mg and grazoprevir 200 mg. Results The raltegravir AUC0-∞ geometric mean ratio (GMR) (90% CI) was 1.02 (0.81-1.27) with elbasvir and 1.43 (0.89-2.30) with grazoprevir. Dolutegravir AUC0-∞ GMR (90% CI) was 1.16 (1.00-1.34) with elbasvir and grazoprevir. The elbasvir AUC0-∞ GMR (90% CI) was 0.81 (0.57-1.17) with raltegravir and 0.98 (0.93-1.04) with dolutegravir. The grazoprevir AUC0-24 GMR (90% CI) was 0.89 (0.72-1.09) with raltegravir and 0.81 (0.67-0.97) with dolutegravir. Conclusions Elbasvir or grazoprevir co-administered with raltegravir or dolutegravir resulted in no clinically meaningful drug-drug interactions and was generally well tolerated. These results support the assertion that no dose adjustments for elbasvir, grazoprevir, raltegravir or dolutegravir are needed for co-administration in HCV/HIV-coinfected people.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated neurocognitive disorders can persist in many patients despite achieving viral suppression while on antiretroviral therapy (ART). Neurocognitive function over 48 weeks was evaluated using a Cogstate test battery assessing psychomotor function, attention, learning, and working memory in 293 HIV-1-infected, ART-experienced, and virologically suppressed adults. The ASSURE study randomized participants 1:2 to remain on tenofovir/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) and ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (ATV/r) or simplify to abacavir/lamivudine + atazanavir (ABC/3TC + ATV). Neurocognitive z-scores were computed using demographically adjusted normative data and were classified as “impaired” (defined as either a z-score ≤ − 2 or having 2 or more standardized individual test z-scores ≤ − 1); while higher scores (equaling better performance) were classified as “normal”. By z-scores, 54.7% of participants had impaired neurocognition at baseline and 50.2% at week 48. There were no significant differences (p

Pre-existing HIV drug resistance can jeopardize first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) success. Changes in the prevalence of drug resistance-associated mutations (DRMs) were analyzed from HIV-infected, ART-naive, U.S. individuals seeking ART treatment from 2000 to 2009. HIV DRM data from 3,829 ART-naive subjects were analyzed by year of sample collection using International Antiviral Society-United States (IAS-USA) and World Health Organization (WHO) “surveillance” DRM definitions; minor IAS-USA-defined DRMs were excluded. IAS-USA DRM prevalence between 2000 and 2009 was 14%, beginning with 8% in 2000 and 13% in 2009. The greatest incidence was observed in 2007 (17%). Overall, IAS-USA-defined non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) DRMs were 9.5%; nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI): 4%, and major protease inhibitor (PI): 3%. The most frequently detected IAS-USA-defined DRMs by class were NNRTI: K103N/S (4%), NRTI: M41L (1.5%), and PI: L90M (1%). Overall, WHO-defined DRM prevalence was 13% (5% in 2000; 13% in 2009). By class, NNRTI prevalence was 6%, NRTI: 6%, and PI: 3.2%. The most frequent WHO-defined DRMs were NRTI: codon T215 (3.0%), NNRTI: K103N/S (4%), and PI: L90 (1%). WHO-defined NNRTI DRMs declined significantly (p = .0412) from 2007 to 2009. The overall prevalence of HIV-1 containing major IAS-USA or WHO-defined DRMs to ≥2 or ≥3 classes was 2% and

Kathleen E Squires,1 Benjamin Young,2,3 Lizette Santiago,4 Robin H Dretler,5 Sharon L Walmsley,6 Henry H Zhao,7 Gary E Pakes,8 Lisa L Ross,8 Mark S Shaefer8 On behalf of the ARIES Study Team 1Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, 2Apex Family Medicine and Research, Denver, CO, 3International Association of Physicians in AIDS Care, Washington DC, USA; 4HOPE Clinic and Wellness Center, San Juan, Puerto Rico; 5ID Specialists of Atlanta, Decatur, GA, USA; 6University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; 7GlaxoSmithKline, 8ViiV Healthcare, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA Purpose: The 144-week results of the open-label, multicenter Atazanavir/Ritonavir Induction with Epzicom Study (ARIES) were stratified by gender to compare treatment responses.Methods: A total of 369 HIV-infected, antiretroviral-naïve subjects receiving once-daily abacavir/lamivudine + atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r) whose HIV-1 RNA was

A retrospective analysis of the randomized controlled DART (Development of AntiRetroviral Therapy in Africa; ISRCTN13968779) trial in HIV-1-positive adults initiating antiretroviral therapy with co-formulated zidovudine/lamivudine plus either tenofovir, abacavir, or nevirapine was conducted to evaluate the safety of initiating standard lamivudine dosing in patients with impaired creatinine clearance (CLcr). Safety data collected through 96 weeks were analyzed after stratification by baseline CLcr (estimated using Cockcroft-Gault) of 30–49 mL/min (n = 168) versus ≥50 mL/min (n = 3,132) and treatment regimen. The Grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (for hematological, hepatic and gastrointestinal events), maximal toxicities for liver enzymes, serum creatinine and bilirubin and maximum treatment-emergent hematology toxicities were comparable for groups with baseline CLcr 30–49 versus CLcr≥50 mL/min. No new risks or trends were identified from this dataset. Substantial and similar increases in the mean creatinine clearance (>25 mL/min) were observed from baseline though Week 96 among participants who entered the trial with CLcr 30–49 mL/min, while no increase or smaller median changes in creatinine clearance ( 150 cells/ mm3) in mean CD4+ cells counts from baseline to Week 96 were also observed for participants who entered the trial with CLcr 30–49 mL/min and those with baseline CLcr ≥50 mL/min. Though these results are descriptive, they suggest that HIV-positive patients with CLcr of 30–49 mL/min would have similar AE risks in comparison to patients with CLcr ≥50 mL/min when initiating antiretroviral therapy delivering doses of 300 mg of lamivudine daily through 96 weeks of treatment. Overall improvements in CLcr were observed for patients with baseline CLcr 30–49 mL/min.

INTRODUCTION Doravirine, a non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor in development for the treatment of patients with human immunodeficiency virus-1 infection, has potential to be used concomitantly in antiretroviral therapy with dolutegravir, an integrase strand transfer inhibitor. The pharmacokinetic interactions between these drugs were therefore assessed. METHODS Oral formulations of doravirine and dolutegravir were dosed both individually and concomitantly once daily in healthy adults. Twelve subjects (six were male), 23-42 years of age, were enrolled and 11 completed this phase I, open-label, three-period, fixed-sequence study per protocol; one subject was discontinued for a positive cotinine test at admission to period 2. In period 1, dolutegravir 50 mg was administered for 7 days. After a 7-day washout, doravirine 200 mg was dosed for 7 days in period 2, followed (without washout) by both doravirine and dolutegravir simultaneously for 7 days in period 3. Plasma samples were taken to determine dolutegravir and doravirine concentrations. RESULTS The steady-state concentration 24 h post-dose (C24) of dolutegravir was not substantially altered by co-administration of doravirine multiple doses; area under the plasma concentration-time curve from dosing to 24 h post-dose (AUC0-24), maximum concentration (C max), and C24 geometric mean ratios were 1.36, 1.43, and 1.27, respectively. The pharmacokinetics of doravirine was not affected by multiple doses of dolutegravir (geometric mean ratios: 1.00, 0.98, and 1.06 for AUC0-24, C24, and C max, respectively). Both drugs were generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION The results of this study demonstrate that concomitant administration of doravirine and dolutegravir in healthy subjects causes no clinically significant alteration in the pharmacokinetic and safety profiles of the two drugs, thereby supporting further evaluation of co-administration of these agents for human immunodeficiency virus-1 treatment.

To the EditorIn a previous issue of this journal [HIV Clinical Trials 2012;13(5):233–244], Squires and colleagues reported the 144-week results of a randomized, open-label, multicenter trial that u...

Objectives HIV treatment guidelines endorse switching or simplification of antiretroviral therapy in therapy-experienced patients with suppressed viraemia; ritonavir discontinuation may also enhance tolerability and reduce long-term adverse events (AEs). This open-label, multicentre, noninferiority study enrolled HIV-1-infected, treatment-experienced adults with confirmed HIV-1 RNA ≤ 75 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL currently receiving tenofovir/emtricitabine + atazanavir/ritonavir (TDF/FTC + ATV/r) for ≥ 6 months with no reported history of virological failure. Methods Participants were randomized 1:2 to continue current treatment or switch to abacavir/lamivudine + atazanavir (ABC/3TC + ATV). Endpoints included the proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA

Treatment-emergent mutations and drug resistance were analyzed in virus from HIV-infected children meeting virologic failure (VF) criteria over 48 weeks following treatment with unboosted fosamprenavir or fosamprenavir/ritonavir-containing regimens in studies APV20002 and APV29005. Both antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naive and ART-experienced patients were enrolled. Patients met VF criteria by either failing to suppress HIV-RNA to

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text., Background: Pharmacokinetics, safety and antiviral activity of twice-daily fosamprenavir with or without ritonavir were evaluated in 2- to 18-year-old protease inhibitor–naïve and -experienced HIV-1–infected children. Methods: Serial pharmacokinetic samples were collected at week 2 and predose samples every 4–12 weeks. Safety and plasma HIV-1 RNA were monitored every 4–12 weeks. Results: Twenty protease inhibitor–naïve 2- to 48 weeks. Twice-daily doses of fosamprenavir/ritonavir 23/3 mg/kg in 2- to

Background The presence of the HLA-B*57:01 allele in HIV-infected subjects is associated with a higher risk of abacavir-associated hypersensitivity reaction (ABC HSR). HLA-B*57:01 allele prevalence varies in different populations, but HLA-B*57:01 testing with immunological confirmation has had a negative predictive value for ABC HSR between 97 and 100%. Methods In the ASSURE study (EPZ113734), the HLA-B*57:01 prevalence in virologically suppressed, antiretroviral treatment–experienced, HIV-infected subjects from the United States, including Puerto Rico, was assessed. Results Three hundred eighty-five subjects were screened; 13 were HLA-B*57:01 positive and 372 were negative. Only HLA-B*57:01-negative, abacavir-naive subjects were eligible to enroll into the ASSURE trial. Eleven of the 13 subjects who possessed the HLA-B*57:01 allele were white, the other 2 were African-American. There was no geographic clustering of HLA-B*57:01-positive subjects, and the incidence correlated roughly with those states with the greatest numbers of subjects screened. Similarly, there was no statistically significant correlation between subjects who possessed or lacked the allele and age, gender, ethnicity or CD4+ T-cell numbers. The incidence of ABC HSR following abacavir initiation was also evaluated. Only 1 of 199 HLA-B*57:01-negative subjects (an African-American male) randomized to receive abacavir-containing treatment developed symptoms consistent with suspected ABC HSR; ABC HSR was not immunologically confirmed. Conclusions These findings confirm the utility of HLA-B*57:01 allele testing to reduce the frequency of ABC HSR. The prevalence of HLA-B*57:01 positivity was higher in white than in African-American subjects. In HLA-B*57:01-negative subjects, suspected ABC HSR is very rare, but should lead to discontinuation of abacavir when ABC HSR cannot be definitively excluded from the differential diagnosis. Trial registration The ASSURE (EPZ113734) study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov registration on April 8th 2010 and the registration number is NCT01102972.

The open-label study ARIES (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00440947) utilized a ritonavir (/r)-boosted protease inhibitor treatment simplification strategy. Antiretroviral-naïve subjects received abacavir/lamivudine (ABC/3TC) + atazanavir/ ritonavir (ATV/r) from baseline through randomization at week 36, then maintained or discontinued ritonavir for an additional 108 weeks. Non-inferiority of the unboosted regimen was demonstrated at week 84. In this optional extension phase, virologic suppression and adverse events were assessed through week 144.Patients were randomized at week 36 if they had confirmed HIV RNA50 copies/mL by week 30 and no previous virologic failure (VF; defined as failure to achieve HIV RNA400 copies/mL or confirmed rebound after achieving HIV RNA ≥400 copies/mL). Three hundred sixty-nine subjects who completed 84 weeks in ARIES participated in the extension phase and maintained their randomized regimen for an additional 60 weeks post randomization.At week 144, 146/189 (77%) versus 132/180 (73%) subjects in the unboosted ATV and ATV/r groups, respectively, maintained HIV RNA50 copies/mL. Post randomization (weeks 36-144), treatment-related grade 2-4 adverse events were more common in the ATV/r-treated (23%) compared to the ATV-treated (13%) group; the most frequently reported was increased serum bilirubin (6% of ATV-treated subjects vs 14 % of ATV/r-treated subjects). During the extension phase, 3% (11/369) of subjects met protocol-defined VF (5 ATV-treated and 6 ATV/ r-treated subjects); one ATV/r-treated subject had treatment-emergent major viral resistance-associated mutations. The median change in fasting triglycerides from baseline to week 144 was significantly different (P=.001) in the ATV-treated (-8.5 mg/dL) compared to the ATV/r-treated (28.5 mg/dL) groups.These long-term study results demonstrate that ATV in combination with ABC/3TC is a potent, well-tolerated regimen in patients who have achieved initial suppression on a ritonavir-boosted regimen.

In HBV/HIV-coinfected patients, the risk of end-stage liver disease and death is increased. This open-label, prospective, pilot study evaluated abacavir/lamivudine/zidovudine twice daily plus tenofovir once daily in HBV/HIV- coinfected antiretroviral-naive subjects. Nine adults (8 males) enrolled, with baseline mean HIV-1 RNA = 4.5 log10 copies/mL, HBV DNA = 9.0 log10 copies/mL, and median CD4 count =158 cells/mm 3 . No subject had baseline ALT >5x ULN. Six subjects completed the study: 1 withdrew due to non-treatment-related toxoplasmosis and 2 were lost-to-follow-up. At week 48, 100% (6/6) of remaining subjects had � 2 log10 decrease in HBV DNA, and 100% (6/6) and 83% (5/6) had HIV- 1 RNA

Background Treatment simplification strategies involving induction with a ritonavir (RTV)-boosted (/r) protease inhibitor regimen followed by simplification (without RTV) are appealing because they may offer sustained virologic suppression while minimizing potential long-term adverse effects associated with RTV. Methods This open-label, randomized, noninferiority study enrolled 515 antiretroviral therapy-naive patients to receive abacavir/lamivudine plus atazanavir/RTV (ATV/r) followed by randomization at week 36 (N = 419) to maintain or discontinue RTV for an additional 48 weeks. Eligibility for randomization required confirmed HIV RNA level below 50 copies/ml and no virologic failure. Protocol-defined virologic failure after week 36 was confirmed rebound of HIV RNA level at least 400 copies/ml. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with HIV RNA level below 50 copies/ml at week 84 (time to loss of virologic response). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00440947. Results At week 84, noninferiority of ATV to ATV/r (95% confidence interval around the treatment difference -1.75 to 12.48%) was demonstrated with 181 of 210 (86%) patients in the ATV group and 169 of 209 (81%) in the ATV/r group maintaining HIV RNA level below 50 copies/ml. During the randomized phase (weeks 36-84), 10 versus 14% of patients in the ATV and ATV/r arms, respectively, experienced a drug-related grades 2-4 adverse event with hyperbilirubinemia being the most frequently reported (4 versus 10%). The overall rate of protocol-defined virologic failure was 2%; no patient had virus that developed a major protease inhibitor mutation. Conclusion ATV in combination with abacavir/lamivudine is a potent and well tolerated regimen in patients who have achieved initial suppression on an induction regimen and represents a viable treatment simplification strategy.

Background HIV clonal genotypic analysis (CG) was used to investigate whether a more sensitive analysis method would detect additional low-abundance mutations compared with population genotyping (PG) in antiretroviral-naive patients who experienced virological failure (VF) during treatment with abacavir/lamivudine/zidovudine and tenofovir. Methods HIV was analysed by PG and CG (771 baseline and 657 VF clones) from subjects with VF (confirmed HIV RNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at 24–48 weeks). Results Fourteen of 123 subjects (11%) met VF criteria; their median baseline HIV RNA was 5.4 log10 copies/mL, and 4.0 log10 copies/mL at VF. By baseline PG, 2/14 had HIV-1 with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) or non-NRTI mutations. By baseline CG, 9/14 had HIV-1 with NNRTI and/or NRTI mutations; 7/9 had study drug-associated mutations. By PG at VF, 10/14 had selected for resistance mutations [2, K65R; 1, M184V; and 7, thymidine analogue mutations (TAMs) ± M184V]. By CG at VF, for subjects with TAMs, T215F was more commonly detected (5/14 samples) than T215Y (2/14). For one subject who selected K65R at VF, both K65R-containing clones and TAM-containing clones (both T215A and T215F) were observed independently but not conjunctively in the same clone in a post-VF sample. Conclusions The majority of subjects with VF had major and minor mutations detected at VF; CG detected additional low-abundance variants at baseline and VF that could have influenced mutation selection pathways. Both PG and CG data suggest TAMs, not K65R selection, are the preferred resistance route, biased towards 215F selection. No HIV clone contained both K65R and T215F/Y mutations, suggesting in vivo antagonism between the two mutations. The once-daily zidovudine usage and high baseline viraemia may also have contributed to rapid selection of HIV with multiple mutations in VFs.

The long-term efficacy of once-daily (qd) fosamprenavir (FPV) 1400 mg boosted by ritonavir 100 mg (FPV/r100) has not been evaluated previously. A 96-week open-label, randomized, multicenter study compared the efficacy/safety of FPV/r100 with FPV 1400 mg boosted by ritonavir 200 mg qd (FPV/r200), plus abacavir/lamivudine 600 mg/300 mg qd, in antiretroviral-naive, HIV-infected patients with viral load (VL)or =1000 copies/ml. Primary endpoints were proportion of patients achieving VL400 copies/ml or discontinuing for drug-related reasons. In the intent-to-treat:exposed (ITT-E) population, missing = failure (M = F), and observed approaches were used to assess between-arm differences in VL responses by Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test and CD4(+) count by Wilcoxon rank-sum test. One hundred and fifteen (115) patients enrolled, with 58 on FPV/r100 (median VL 4.7 log(10) copies/ml; CD4(+) count 259 cells/mm(3)) and 57 on FPV/r200 (median VL 4.9 log(10) copies/ml; CD4(+) count 179 cells/mm(3)). Fewer FPV/r100-treated patients discontinued treatment prematurely (12 vs. 24) and experienced virologic failure (5 vs. 8, none developing major protease inhibitor resistance mutations). At week 96, more FPV/r100-treated patients had VL400 copies/ml [ITT-E,M = F: 78% (45/58) vs. 53% (30/57), p = 0.006; observed: 98% (45/46) vs. 94% (30/32)] and VL50 copies/ml [ITT-E,M = F: 66% (38/58) vs. 53% (30/57); observed: 83% (38/46) vs. 94% (30/32)]. The FPV/r100 and FPV/r200 arms were similar at week 96 regarding median change from baseline in CD4(+) count (+265 vs. +260 cells/mm(3)) and total cholesterol (+33 vs. +35 mg/dl), and in total-cholesterol:HDL-cholesterol ratio (4.0 vs. 4.1) and type/frequency of treatment-related grade 2-4 adverse events, although FPV/r100 was associated with a lower elevation in triglycerides (+27 vs. +48 mg/dl). In conclusion, through 96 weeks, FPV/r100 was more effective and prompted less elevation in triglycerides than FPV/r200.

BACKGROUND: Antiretroviral combinations that reduce the number of pills and dosing frequency have the potential to simplify therapy. We compared 2 regimens dosed as 2 pills once daily. METHODS: This was a randomized, open-label, multicenter study of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus efavirenz, both administered once daily with the abacavir/lamivudine fixed-dose combination in treatment-naive human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected subjects. After reports of early nonresponse, an unplanned interim analysis was performed. Virologic nonresponse was defined as (1) a or =1.0 log(10) copies/mL above the nadir, or (3) for subjects with 2 consecutive HIV-1 RNA measurements 400 copies/mL on 2 consecutive occasions. RESULTS: We randomized 340 subjects. Median baseline HIV-1 RNA level and CD4+ cell count were 4.7 log(10) copies/mL and 251 cells/mm3, respectively; 194 subjects with HIV-1 RNA data from > or =8 weeks were included in the interim analysis. Virologic nonresponse occurred in 50 (49%) of 102 subjects in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate arm, compared with 5 (5%) of 92 of subjects in the efavirenz arm (P

Drug resistance testing is increasingly used to guide treatment decisions in patients infected with HIV-1. A number of rules-based algorithms have been designed to predict drug resistance profiles based on the HIV-1 genotypic data. Drug-resistance mutations in 206 viral samples from protease inhibitor (PI)-experienced subjects with HIV-1 infection were assessed, and the level of susceptibility of the samples predicted using seven unique algorithms. kappa scores were used to compare agreement of results obtained using each of the predictive algorithms with the phenotypic assay results. Good overall agreement between the different algorithms and the phenotypic results was observed. Good or excellent agreement was observed between the results obtained by the predictive algorithms and the phenotypic assay results for ritonavir, indinavir, saquinavir, and nelfinavir. For amprenavir and lopinavir, there were marked differences between the different algorithms, with poor agreement (kappa < 0.40) obtained with four of the seven algorithms for amprenavir. For lopinavir, poor agreement was obtained with three of seven algorithms using the 2.5-fold biological cut-off and four of seven with the clinical cut-off of 10. Atazanavir susceptibility was evaluated for concordance among six algorithms, with a range of 23-50% of the samples maintaining susceptibility. Although this cohort of patients included many who were highly antiretroviral experienced, predictive algorithms demonstrated good agreement with phenotype for several Pls. For those where discordance among algorithms existed, further improvement will likely occur as drug resistance pathways for the more recently approved PIs are elucidated.

One of the major challenges to the successful long-term treatment ofHIV-1 infection is overcoming the development of increasing levelsof antiretroviral resistance that often accompany the failure of suc-cessive treatment regimens. In order to meet this challenge a goodunderstanding of genotypic resistance profiles and the potential forcross-resistance within each class of antiretrovirals is essential. Forthe protease inhibitors (PIs), cross-resistance is complex, as a resultof the large number of mutations involved. Amprenavir and lopinavirare potent PIs used in ritonavir-boosted regimens, often in patientswho have already experienced treatment with other PIs. The resist-ance profiles of these two PIs overlap to a certain extent but also con-tain some important differences that can be exploited in the choice ofoptimal treatment for PI-experienced patients. This article reviewsour own research and that of others, in order to clarify the similaritiesand the differences between the genotypic resistance profiles foramprenavir and lopinavir. Whereas phenotypic data are valuable forunderstanding resistance, HIV-1 genotyping is critical in making theoptimal choice between these two drugs in PI-experienced subjects.

A post hoc analysis of safety data from study protocol NZT40012 assessed the incidence of conditions defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 86 zidovudine-naïve, antiretroviral-experienced patients with HIV-1 infection who responded poorly (plasma HIV-1 RNA1000 copies/mL) despite at least 4 months' treatment with stavudine-containing regimens. Peripheral neuropathy occurred in 21%; other conditions were seen less frequently (candidiasis [13%], herpes zoster [12%], diarrhea lasting1 month [9%], Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia [9%], and wasting syndrome [8%]). The incidence of peripheral neuropathy rose significantly with the number of drugs comprising treatment regimens (or = 4 vs 1-3; P = .013) and tended to be higher in patients with longer exposure to stavudine (29% withor = 24 months' exposure vs 13% with24 months). Because peripheral neuropathy was observed with such high frequency, vigilance for signs and symptoms of this condition appears warranted if stavudine-containing regimens are to be continued.

Factors that contribute to the transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), especially drug-resistant HIV-1 variants remain a significant public health concern. In-depth phylogenetic analyses of viral sequences obtained in the screening phase from antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected patients seeking enrollment in EPZ108859, a large open-label study in the USA, Canada and Puerto Rico (ClinicalTrials.gov {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT00440947","term_id":"NCT00440947"}}NCT00440947) were examined for insights into the roles of drug resistance and epidemiological factors that could impact disease dissemination. Viral transmission clusters (VTCs) were initially predicted from a phylogenetic analysis of population level HIV-1 pol sequences obtained from 690 antiretroviral-naive subjects in 2007. Subsequently, the predicted VTCs were tested for robustness by ultra deep sequencing (UDS) using pyrosequencing technology and further phylogenetic analyses. The demographic characteristics of clustered and non-clustered subjects were then compared. From 690 subjects, 69 were assigned to 1 of 30 VTCs, each containing 2 to 5 subjects. Race composition of VTCs were significantly more likely to be white (72% vs. 60%; p = 0.04). VTCs had fewer reverse transcriptase and major PI resistance mutations (9% vs. 24%; p = 0.002) than non-clustered sequences. Both men-who-have-sex-with-men (MSM) (68% vs. 48%; p = 0.001) and Canadians (29% vs. 14%; p = 0.03) were significantly more frequent in VTCs than non-clustered sequences. Of the 515 subjects who initiated antiretroviral therapy, 33 experienced confirmed virologic failure through 144 weeks while only 3/33 were from VTCs. Fewer VTCs subjects (as compared to those with non-clustering virus) had HIV-1 with resistance-associated mutations or experienced virologic failure during the course of the study. Our analysis shows specific geographical and drug resistance trends that correlate well with transmission clusters defined by HIV sequences of similarity. Furthermore, our study demonstrates the utility of molecular and epidemiological analysis of VTCs for identifying population-specific risks associated with HIV-1 transmission and developing effective local healthcare strategies.

Two novel assays, a restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) assay and an assay based on the 5′-nuclease activity of Taq DNA polymerase, were developed for screening viral variants in lamivudine-treated patients’ sera containing 552 aspartate aspartate motif variants in mixed viral populations. Unlike DNA sequencing, both assays are amenable to high-throughput screening and were shown to be able to quantitatively detect variant virus in the presence of a background of wt virus. As with DNA sequencing, both new assays incorporate a PCR amplification step and are able to detect the relatively low amounts of virus found in lamivudine-treated patients’ sera. However, these assays are far less labor intensive than the DNA-sequencing techniques presently in use. Overall, the RFLP assay was more sensitive than DNA sequencing in detecting and determining the ratios of wt to variant virus. Furthermore, the RFLP assay and 5′-nuclease assay were equally sensitive in the detection of mixed viral species, but the RFLP assay was superior to the 5′-nuclease assay in the quantitation of mixed viral species. These assays should prove useful for further understanding of virological response to therapy and disease progression.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text., Background: Pharmacokinetics, safety and antiviral activity of fosamprenavir (FPV) with ritonavir (RTV) twice daily were evaluated in HIV-1–infected infants and children 4 weeks to

We have developed an in vitro model system quantitating the degradation of extracellular matrix by endothelial cells. Collagen is layered over a reconstituted basement membrane matrix (Matrigel) and the release of laminin contained in the Matrigel into the media by endothelial cells is quantitated by ELISA. The cell-specific release of laminin is consistent and reproducible. Incubating an equivalent number of dead endothelial cells in the same manner results in no release of laminin relative to media controls. The cell-specific laminin release is abolished by removing the exogenous growth factor component of the media and plating the cells in media plus 10% serum. Cells plated onto wells coated with collagen alone do not release laminin into the media, indicating that no de novo synthesis and release of laminin occurs during the time frame of the experiment, and that some factor or combination of factors present in the media supplement is essential for the endothelial cells to release laminin degrading enzymes.

Propensity for developing coronary heart disease (CHD) is linked with Framingham-defined cardiovascular risk factors and elevated inflammatory biomarkers. Cardiovascular risk and inflammatory biomarkers were evaluated in ARIES, a Phase IIIb/IV clinical trial in which 515 antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected subjects initially received abacavir/lamivudine + atazanavir/ritonavir for 36 weeks. Subjects who were virologically suppressed by week 30 were randomized 1:1 at week 36 to either maintain or discontinue ritonavir for an additional 108 weeks. Framingham 10-year CHD risk scores (FRS) and risk category of

Detection of drug resistance is critical for determining antiretroviral treatment options. Ultradeep pyrosequencing (UDPS; 454 Life Sciences) is capable of detecting virus variant subpopulations with much greater sensitivity than population sequencing, which typically has a detection limit around 20%. UDPS of the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) (amino acids 56-120) was performed to detect the key mutations K65R and L74V associated with tenofovir and abacavir use. Plasma specimens from subjects with persistent rebound viremia following suppression on tenofovir (n = 8) or abacavir (n = 9)-based therapy were studied. Samples from a subject treated with zidovudine/lamivudine/efavirenz with a similar loss of virologic response served as a control. HIV-1 plasma RNA was ≥3.68 log(10) copies/ml at all time points sequenced. The median number of UDPS sequences analyzed/time point was 33,246. Among the eight tenofovir-treated subjects, three showed high-frequency (20%) RT K65R at the time of failure, whereas one showed low-frequency (20%) L74V; no low-frequency K65R was detected in these subjects. Among the nine abacavir-treated subjects, three showed low-frequency K65R; no L74V was detected in these patients. No K65R or L74V was detected in the samples from the control subject. At failure, other RT mutations were detected, including low-frequency NNRTI-resistant species detected at ≥1 time point in nine subjects; the key NNRTI mutation K103N, however, was always observed at20% frequency. Although UDPS is useful in the detection of low-frequency subpopulations with transmitted resistance in antiviral-naive patients, it may have less utility in treatment-experienced patients with persistent viremia on therapy.

The ARIES study assessed safety and efficacy of an induction regimen with atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/RTV) + abacavir/lamivudine (ABC/3TC) followed by simplification to ATV + ABC/3TC in antiretroviral-naïve patients.This report includes a noncomparative analysis of all patients in the induction phase of the ARIES study through 36 weeks (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00440947). This open-label study included 515 antiretroviral-naïve,HLA-B*5701-negative patients receiving a regimen of ATV 300 mg, RTV 100 mg, and ABC/3TC 600 mg/300 mg once daily for 36 weeks; eligible patients were then randomized to continue the induction regimen or simplify to ATV 400 mg plus ABC/3TC 600 mg/300 mg once daily.Eighty-six percent (442/515) of patients completed 36 weeks on study; 80% (410/515) achieved HIV RNA50 copies/mL (84% and 76% of patients with baseline HIV RNA ofandor=100,000 copies/mL achieved this endpoint). Virologic failure (VF) was uncommon (3%); treatment-emergent major protease inhibitor and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor mutations were detected in 0/15 and 4/15 patients, respectively. Median CD4+ cell increase was 171 (range, -176 to 718) cells/mm(3). Hyperbilirubinemia (13%), diarrhea (4%), nausea (2%), and rash (2%) were the most frequent drug-related Grade 2-4 adverse events. Few adverse events (3%) led to study discontinuation.Induction with ATV/RTV + ABC/3TC once daily provides an efficacious and well-tolerated regimen for the initial treatment of HIV.

Population genotyping (PG) can underestimate resistance if resistance-containing low abundance variants go undetected. PG and clonal analysis (CA) results were compared in virologic failures (VFs) from a 48-week clinical trial that evaluated once-daily fosamprenavir/ritonavir (FPV/r) 1400 mg/100 mg or atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r) 300 mg/100 mg, each combined with tenofovir/emtricitabine, in antiretroviral-naive patients. VF was defined as confirmed HIV-1 RNA > or =400 copies/ml at > or =24 weeks or viral rebound >400 copies/ml any time following viral suppression. All patients had baseline PG. One hundred and six patients enrolled (53/arm). Baseline resistance mutations were more prevalent in patients receiving FPV/r (10/53) than ATV/r (3/53). Seven patients (7%) were VFs-four on FPV/r and three on ATV/r. In the four FPV/r-treated VFs, baseline HIV TAMs combinations and/or PI mutations were detected in one by PG at VF (RT: L210W + T215C; PR: M46I + L76V) and three others by CA alone (RT: L210W + T215Y; RT: M41L; RT: K65R + K70R; PR: I47V); all four had study drug-associated mutations (CA detecting more HIV-1 resistance mutations than PG). In the three ATV/r VFs, no baseline drug-associated mutations were detected by PG; for one patient CA detected RT: K65R; PR: I84V. Phylogenetic analysis revealed tight clustering for FPV/r-treated VFs with highly related clones, whereas HIV-1 from ATV/r-treated VFs had no outgrowth from baseline of low abundance resistance-containing variants. In conclusion, low-abundance HIV resistance-containing variants were detected in baseline samples from patients with VF. The archived viruses that reemerged under selection pressure and acquired additional mutations were found primarily in patients in the FPV/r arm. Despite this and a baseline resistance imbalance between the two arms, FPV/r and ATV/r provided similar virologic suppression through 48 weeks; however, these findings highlight the necessity for the development of quick and inexpensive methods for detection of minority species to better guide therapy selection.

COL40263 was a pilot 48-week, open-label, multicenter study evaluating the efficacy and safety of once-daily coformulated abacavir/lamivudine/zidovudine plus tenofovir in ART-naive, HIV-infected subjects. We examined the patterns of resistance that were selected on-therapy through 48 weeks in subjects with virologic nonresponse (VF). A total of 123 antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected subjects with plasma HIV-1 RNAor = 30,000copies/ml were enrolled. For subjects with confirmed VF (HIV-1 RNAor = 400 copies/ml at week 24 or later), HIV population genotypic and phenotypic analysis was performed. Of the 123 enrolled subjects, 14 (11%) had confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNAor = 400 copies/ml through week 48. Of these subjects, 3/14 had evidence of drug resistance at baseline: 2/14 had HIV with K103N, Y188F/H/L/Y, and/or T215A and 1/14 had reduced zidovudine susceptibility. At the last time point analyzed, 4/14 subjects had wild-type HIV, while 10/14 subjects had HIV with either thymidine analogue mutations (TAMS) alone (3/10), TAMS + M184V (4/10), M184V only (1/10), or K65R/K (2/10). Matched phenotype was obtained for 13/14 subjects and 8/13 (62%) subjects had reduced susceptibility to one or more study drugs: 2/13 tenofovir, 3/13 abacavir, 4/13 zidovudine, and 7/13 lamivudine. The resistance pattern in COL40263 subjects with VF differs significantly from that reported for tenofovir-containing triple-nucleoside regimens. TAMs were detected in the majority (7/10) of samples from subjects with VF who selected any resistance mutation. These data suggest that TAMs selection is a preferred resistance route of this combination, with zidovudine modulating the resistance pathway against selection for K65R.

Thymidine-sparing triple-nucleoside regimens have exhibited poor virologic response despite apparent phenotypic susceptibility to 2 of 3 regimen components at early time points. Phenotypic resistance masking by wild-type virus may explain this discrepancy.Consistent with this notion were (1) the presence of low level nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor-resistant human immunodeficiency virus in subjects receiving failing first-line regimens consisting of tenofovir (TDF), abacavir (ABC), and lamivudine (3TC); (2) lower fold resistance associated with mixtures versus mutants in a clinical-isolate database; and (3) dose dependent changes in susceptibility to ABC, 3TC, TDF, and didanosine on titration of K65R and/or M184V with wild-type virus. These findings underscore the limitations of stand-alone phenotypic susceptibility measures and emphasize the importance of complementary and/or more sensitive techniques.

While it is known that selection for specific HIV-1 drug resistance-associated mutations (DRM) occurs following ART failure, the patterns of resistance mutations, reduced susceptibility (RS), and replicative capacity (RC) that appear as the number of major NRTI mutations increases have been less well-studied. These changes were examined as a function of the number of major NRTI mutations using patient-derived HIV samples submitted for resistance testing between 2003-2005 (n = 35,222) that were grouped by number of NRTI-DRMs present. In the absence of NRTI-DRMs, few (3.4%) samples had RS to one or more NRTI, 33.6% to one or more NNRTI, and 12.6% to one or more PI. With one NRTI-DRM, 94% had RS to one or more NRTI, 50% to one or more NNRTI, and 33% to one or more PI. Increases in NRTI-DRMs were accompanied by increased prevalence of NNRTI and PI DRMs and RS. With one NRTI-DRM, the mean number of NRTIs with RS was 1.7, while when five NRTI-DRMs were present, RS to > or =5 NRTIs was observed. PI-DRM and RS increased at a slower rate than NNRTI-DRM and RS. RC declined from a mean of 97.8% for samples without NRTI-DRMs to 68.9% with one NRTI-DRM, possibly due to reduced fitness conferred by K65R or M184I/V, to an RC of 43.9% for samples with seven to eight NRTI-DRMs. The relatively high percent of samples with NNRTI-DRM but without NRTI-DRMs may result from selection following virologic failure, and/or transmission of virus uniquely resistant to NNRTI.

Transmission of drug-resistant HIV strains to antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naïve subjects can negatively impact therapy response. As treatment strategies and utilization of antiretroviral drugs evolve, patterns of transmitted mutations may shift.Paired genotypic and phenotypic susceptibility data were retrospectively analyzed for 317 ART-naïve, HIV-infected subjects from 40 small and major metropolitan cities in the Northeastern, Midwestern, Southern, Southwestern, and Northwestern United States during 2003.Using current (January 2007) PhenoSense cutoffs, HIV-from 8% of subjects had reduced susceptibility toor = 1 drug. By class,1% had reduced susceptibility to protease inhibitors (PIs), and 1% had reduced susceptibility to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs); reduced susceptibility toor = 1 non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTIs) was seen in 7% of subjects, with 4% of all subjects having reduced susceptibility to all NNRTIs. IAS-USA-defined NRTI, NNRTI, and/or major PI HIV-drug resistance-associated mutations were detected for 0% of the subjects. HIV risk factors included homosexual contact (74%), heterosexual contact (28%), and injectable drug use/transfusion/other (7%). Reduced susceptibility toor = 1 drug was significantly higher (p = .034) for white subjects than African Americans and Hispanics/others.The high prevalence of drug resistance in these ART-naïve subjects suggests that transmitted resistance is occurring widely within the United States. HIV genotyping and/or phenotyping for antiretroviral-naïve patients seeking treatment should be considered, especially if the therapy will include an NNRTI.

To assess the safety and efficacy of a 4-drug, 3-tablet, once-daily (qd) regimen consisting of abacavir/lamivudine/zidovudine (ABC/3TC/ZDV; 2 tablets) and tenofovir (TDF) in antiretroviral-naïve patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA 30,000 copies/mL at 48 weeks.All participants received ABC/3TC/ZDV (300/150/300 mg) and TDF (300 mg) qd in this pilot, open-label, multicenter study. Intent-to-treat (ITT) analyses were conducted to evaluate virologic and immunologic efficacy.Of the 123 participants enrolled, 52 (42%) prematurely discontinued study for adverse events (14), were lost to follow-up (13), had virologic nonresponse (12), and withdrew for other reasons (13). At week 48, by ITT missing=failure analysis, 41% (51/123) and 51% (63/123) of participants had plasma HIV-1 RNA50 copies/mL and400 copies/mL, respectively; by ITT-observed analysis, 75% (51/68) and 93% (63/68) had plasma HIV-1 RNA50 copies/mL and400 copies/mL, respectively; 11% (14/123) met virologic nonresponse criteria. Median week 48 change in CD4+ cell count from baseline was +127 cells/mm3. Median week 48 changes from baseline for fasting lipids were as follows: cholesterol (-9 mg/dL), HDL (+1 mg/dL), LDL (-9 mg/dL), and triglycerides (-4 mg/dL).A high rate of premature discontinuations contributed to the overall suboptimal virologic response to ABC/3TC/ZDV+TDF qd; however, the regimen was not associated with high rates of virologic failure previously observed with TDF+ABC/3TC.

Background: In recent ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI) studies, high efficacy rates have been observed, with few PI mutations detected. Method: To better understand the types of mutations observed and their phenotypic impact and the likelihood of virologic failure (VF) on a regimen that includes either a ritonavirboosted or unboosted PI, fosamprenavir, a meta-analysis of three studies (NEAT, SOLO, and KLEAN) of 922 ART-naive participants receiving boosted (FPV/r) or unboosted fosamprenavir (FPV) plus abacavir/lamivudine was performed. 70% of participants by the missing and discontinuation equals failure analysis and 95% by the observed analysis had HIV-RNA

The impact of drug resistance-associated mutations on subsequent antiretroviral therapy is an important consideration in managing treatment-experienced, HIV-1-infected patients. Lamivudine (3TC) and emtricitabine (FTC) are structurally related nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) approved for use in HIV-1-infected individuals. To evaluate whether susceptibility differences exist between lamivudine and emtricitabine, the phenotypic impact of common NRTI resistance-associated mutations was compared in HIV-1 from patient samples with paired FTC and 3TC susceptibility results. FTC phenotypic susceptibility was more greatly impacted than 3TC susceptibility in the presence of thymidine analogue mutations (TAMs), as the mean fold-change values were higher for FTC than for 3TC in groups of samples containing TAMs (P < 0.001 for 6 of 7 groups). For samples with K65R, L74I/V, or Q151M mutations, the phenotypic impact was similar, as the mean fold-change was not significantly different between drugs. Although the long-term clinical significance of these differences is unclear, they may suggest differential efficacy in some patients with prior NRTI experience, especially those with HIV harboring TAMs.

HIV-1 drug resistance methodologies are being increasingly utilized to guide treatment decisions; however, information comparing the various assays is limited. Duplicate plasma samples from 70 ART-experienced subjects were analyzed by both the Antivirogram and PhenoSense phenotypic assays and the results compared. HIV genotypes were also obtained and analyzed using seven different resistance algorithms. These results were also compared with the phenotypic assay results. Concordances between the phenotypic tests and between each algorithm, and between the two phenotypic assays were calculated and kappa coefficients (KC) determined. Overall agreement between the two phenotypic assays was good (86.9% concordance; KC 0.621). The highest concordance by drug class was seen for protease inhibitors (93.4%; KC 0.679) and the lowest (79.8%; KC 0.549) for nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Concordance between the two phenotypic assays, when evaluating individual drugs, was good for all drugs tested except for abacavir, zalcitabine, and indinavir. Agreement between the seven algorithms and each phenotypic assay was variable, though most had good or excellent agreement. The highest overall level of agreement for an individual drug was observed when comparing lamivudine susceptibility to either assay. Concordance for abacavir, didanosine, zalcitabine, and saquinavir was generally problematic when comparing one or more phenotypic assays to the drug resistance predictive algorithms. In conclusion, results comparing these two phenotypic tests were mostly similar, but comparisons of the predictive resistance algorithms for specific drugs, as well as to specific phenotypic assays, were more inconsistent.

Objective: To determine if stavudine (a4T)-associated mitochondrial toxicity could be reversed by substitution with another nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor. As apoptosis and dysfunction of electron transport chain (ETC) activities may underlie mitochondrial toxicity, these parameters were also evaluated. Design: The 16 participants (on d4T for >3 years; with lipoatrophy and/or hyperlactatemia) substituted abacavir or zidovudine for stavudine in their antiretroviral regimen. Key parameters including dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans, fat apoptosis, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) content in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), skeletal muscle and fat, as well as skeletal muscle mitochondrial ETC activities were evaluated at study entry and at 48 weeks after the substitution. Methods: Quantitative PCR was used to evaluate mtDNA levels and the presence of deletions/rearrangements; CLIA-validated methods for ETC activities; terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP-digoxigenin nick-end labeling assays to evaluate adipocyte apoptosis; and DEXA scans to measure changes in body fat. Results: MtDNA was depleted at study entry in muscle, adipose tissue and PBMC but levels rebounded with respective mean increases of 141%, 146%, and 369% at week 48. Corresponding fat improvements were noted with DEXA increases of 21%, 11%, and 16% in arm, leg, and trunk, respectively. Quantitative adipocyte apoptosis were significantly increased at baseline (P < 0.01 versus HIV-negative controls), with a significant reduction at week 48 (P < 0.05 versus baseline). Mean values for seven mitochondrial enzyme activities assays at entry indicated substantial loss of function (48% to 85% of controls) with significant improvement of complex I activity by week 48. Conclusions: Substitution of stavudine with abacavir or zidovudine improves mitochondrial indices and fat apoptosis in the setting of lipoatrophy.

Background. Few data are available concerning the impact of antiretroviral resistance in response to antiviral therapy in children. We evaluated the development of antiretroviral genotypic resistance and clinical outcome in a subgroup of children involved in a prospective antiretroviral therapy trial (Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 152). Design. We studied 26 matched case/control pairs. A case was defined as having clinical disease progression during the study period; controls did not have disease progression. Cases and controls were matched by age and CD4 + cell count at baseline. Matched pairs received treatment with zidovudine (9 pairs), didanosine (12 pairs) or combined therapy (5 pairs). Multiple codons of the reverse transcriptase coding region (41, 67, 70, 74, 151, 184, 210, 215 and 219) were analyzed. Patients were evaluated for CD4 + cell count, HIV-1 viral load and HIV-1 biologic phenotype at baseline and clinical endpoint. Results. The presence of mutations associated with resistance after nucleoside antiretroviral therapy (P = 0.039) and syncytium-inducing phenotype (P = 0.031), were significantly associated with increased risk of clinical disease progression. The mean difference in HIV-1 RNA levels between cases and their matched controls after nucleoside antiretroviral therapy was 0.77 logic copies/ml higher for cases (P = 0.003). The median difference between cases and controls for CD4 + cell count after nucleoside antiretroviral therapy was 349 cells/mm 3 lower for cases (P < 0.001). Conclusions. In this small prospective study of HIV-infected children, mutations in the reverse transcriptase coding region, syncytium-inducing viral phenotype, higher HIV-1 RNA load and lower CD4 + cell count were significantly correlated with increased risk of HIV clinical disease progression.

Genotypic correlates of reduced phenotypic susceptibility to amprenavir (APV) and lopinavir (LPV) were examined in 271 HIV isolates from 207 protease inhibitor (PI)-experienced subjects. All samples were from LPV-naive subjects; two were from APV-experienced subjects. Using a fold resistance (FR) of2.5, 179 (66%) were APV susceptible. Using FRs of2.5 and10, 107 (39%) and 194 (72%), respectively, were LPV susceptible. The I84V mutation was the strongest APV resistance marker in PI-experienced subjects in both univariate and multivariate analyses, with an increased relative incidence (RI) of 6.9 with2.5 FR. Mutations L10I (RI, 1.7), M46I (RI, 2.3), and L90M (RI, 1.9, but 65% linked with the I84V) were associated with decreased APV susceptibility in the univariate analysis (p0.001). Mutations L10I, G48V, I54T, I54V, and V82A were significantly associated with decreased LPV susceptibility (p0.001 for each) and had increased RIs of 2.2, 4.4, 13, 4.6, and 3.2, respectively. Decreased susceptibility to LPV (FR,or=10) was significantly associated with prior exposure to the following PIs: ritonavir (RTV) (p0.001), saquinavir (SQV) (p0.001), nelfinavir (NFV) (p = 0.008), and indinavir (IDV) (p = 0.028). Decreased APV susceptibility (FR,or=2.5) was significantly associated with prior exposure to RTV (p = 0.009), NFV (p = 0.003), and IDV (p = 0.021) but not with prior SQV (p = 0.103). These results suggest that APV and LPV have different cross-resistance mutation patterns that may help determine choice of PI therapy after therapy failure.

Objective: Simplification of antiretroviral therapy in patients with suppressed viremia may minimize long-term adverse effects. The study’s primary objective was to determine whether abacavir/lamivudine + atazanavir (ABC/3TC+ATV) was virologically non-inferior to tenofovir/emtricitabine + atazanavir/ritonavir (TDF/FTC+ATV/r) over 24 weeks in a population of virologically suppressed, HIV-1 infected patients. Design: This open-label, multicenter, non-inferiority study enrolled antiretroviral experienced, HIV-infected adults currently receiving a regimen of TDF/FTC+ATV/r for $6 months with no history of virologic failure and whose HIV-1 RNA had been # 75 copies/mL on 2 consecutive measurements including screening. Patients were randomized 1:2 to continue current treatment or simplify to ABC/3TC+ATV. Methods: The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with HIV-RNA,50 copies/mL at Week 24 by the Time to Loss of Virologic Response (TLOVR) algorithm. Secondary endpoints included alternative measures of efficacy, adverse events (AEs), and fasting lipids. Exploratory endpoints included inflammatory, coagulation, bone, and renal biomarkers. Results: After 24 weeks, ABC/3TC+ATV (n=199) was non-inferior to TDF/FTC+ATV/r (n=97) by both the primary analysis (87% in both groups) and all secondary efficacy analyses. Rates of grade 2–4 AEs were similar between the two groups (40% vs 37%, respectively), but an excess of hyperbilirubinemia made the rate of grade 3–4 laboratory abnormalities higher in the TDF/FTC+ATV/r group (30%) compared with the ABC/3TC+ATV group (13%). Lipid levels were stable except for HDL cholesterol, which increased significantly in the ABC/3TC+ATV group. Bone and renal biomarkers improved significantly between baseline and Week 24 in patients taking ABC/3TC+ATV, and the difference between groups was significant at Week 24. No significant changes occurred in any inflammatory or coagulation biomarker within or between treatment groups. Conclusions: After 24 weeks, simplification to ABC/3TC+ATV from TDF/FTC+ATV/r maintained viral suppression was welltolerated, and led to improvements in bone and renal biomarkers and HDL cholesterol. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01102972 GlaxoSmithKline Clinical Study Register 113734

This study examines the association between presence of drug resistance mutations and phenotypic resistance at baseline to virologic response to salvage therapy in a community setting. The study population consisted of 58 antiretroviral drug-experienced patients with HIV-1 infection who had recently switched therapy because of virologic failure. Drug resistance mutations in the reverse transcriptase- and protease-coding regions and phenotypic susceptibility to 13 antiretroviral drugs were assessed at baseline. Plasma HIV-1 RNA levels were assessed at baseline and at subsequent clinic visits. Results showed that three variables were significant in predicting virologic response: HIV-1 levels at baseline, number of protease mutations, and phenotypic sensitivity score for the regimen at baseline. For four drugs there was a significant association between the presence of specific drug resistance mutations and >10-fold phenotypic resistance to that drug. With phenotypic resistance defined as >4-fold resistance, the association between specific drug resistance mutations and phenotypic resistance was significant for seven drugs. Overall, these data show that phenotypic susceptibility and absence of drug resistance mutations, particularly protease mutations, are significant predictors of virologic response. For several drugs, specific combinations of drug resistance mutations are associated with decreased phenotypic susceptibility and might provide useful clinical guidelines in selecting therapeutic options.

Studies have demonstrated that HIV-1 isolated from subjects experiencing virologic failure on stavudine (d4T)-containing regimens often contains thymidine analog mutations (TAMs), consisting of reverse transcriptase (RT) mutations M41L, D67N, K70R, L210W, T215Y/F, and K219Q/E, previously associated only with zidovudine (ZDV) resistance. In clinical study NZT40012, HIV-1 was isolated from 86 ZDV-naive subjects experiencing viremia on d4T-based therapies (plasma HIV-1 RNA > or =1000 copies/ml) and analyzed to examine the association between RT mutations and phenotypic resistance to d4T. Resistance-associated mutations were analyzed from HIV-1 isolated from 85 subjects. Of these, 24 samples (28%) had TAMs, and 30 samples (35%) had either TAMs and/or the Q151M multinucleoside resistance (MNR) mutation. Phenotypic susceptibility to d4T was determined by two commercially available methods. Statistically significant increases (p < 0.001) in phenotypic fold resistance to d4T were observed in virus with at least one TAM or MNR mutation. However, the mean increases in phenotypic resistance were 4-fold for the Antivirogram assay and 3-fold for the Phenosense HIV assay, only slightly above the levels used to designate decreased susceptibility to d4T. Subjects can experience viremia on d4T-containing regimens with virus exhibiting only small increases in IC(50), suggesting that relatively small changes in viral susceptibility to d4T may influence drug efficacy.

This open-label, multicenter, single-arm clinical trial assessed the 48-week efficacy of a twice-daily triple nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor regimen containing a lamivudine (150 mg)-zidovudine (300 mg) combination tablet (COM) and abacavir (ABC; 300 mg) in 87 antiretroviral therapy-experienced, protease inhibitor-naive patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). At baseline, the median plasma HIV-1 RNA level was 3.10 log(10) copies/mL, and the median CD4 cell count was 506 cells/mm(3). An intent-to-treatrcolon;observed analysis showed that, at weeks 24 and 48 of treatment, HIV-1 RNA level was400 copies/mL in 48 (76%) of 63 and 45 (82%) of 55 patients, respectively, and50 copies/mL in 37 (59%) of 63 and 31 (56%) of 55 patients, respectively. Previous zidovudine or lamivudine use and presence at baseline of the M184V reverse-transcriptase mutation did not impact virologic response. Median CD4 cell counts were maintained above baseline throughout the study. COM plus ABC was generally well tolerated.

Objective To assess the correlation between the outgrowth of mutant viruses (viral genetic heterogeneity), highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), and plasma HIV-1 RNA in a population-based observational cohort study. Design The study population consisted of 42 HIV-1-infected individuals receiving at least two nucleotide reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors and one or more protease inhibitors at study entry. There were no restrictions on antiretroviral therapy after enrollment. Methods Plasma samples were obtained from subjects at baseline, at therapy changes, and at quarterly intervals for quantitation of HIV-1 RNA levels and for sequence determination of the entire protease coding region and the first 235 codons of the reverse transcriptase coding region. Data were analyzed using the generalized estimating equation method for longitudinal data and using linear regression analysis. Results With increased time on HAART there were significant increases in the number of total HIV-1 mutations in the regions sequenced (P = 0.010). There were significant correlations between the increases in the plasma HIV-1 RNA levels and the numbers of total mutations and reverse transcriptase mutations (P = 0.007 and 0.021, respectively). Conclusions The number of HIV-1 mutations increased over time. Failure of HAART in this study population was correlated with outgrowth of virus with numerous mutations in the reverse transcriptase and protease coding regions. Phenotypic results correlated with genotypic results, showing decreased susceptibility to antiretrovirals over time in the majority of this population during HAART. Both synonymous and non-synonymous mutations were observed, with a higher incidence of non-synonymous mutations occurring at codons associated with drug resistance.

Early detection of viral mutations, particularly those mutations associated with cross-resistance to antiretroviral drugs, is critical both for understanding the mechanism of drug resistance and for the clinical management of patients infected with HIV-1. One of the frequently observed mutations in the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT)-coding region is ACC --TAC at codon 215, resulting in a change of wild-type threonine (T) to tyrosine (Y); this mutation has been associated with decreased phenotypic susceptibility to zidovudine (ZDV). We describe a technique for the detection of the T215Y mutation using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) amplification of viral sequences and a 5' nuclease assay requiring fluorogenic probes. In addition to detecting the presence of the ACC --TAC mutation at codon 215, this assay provides an increased ability to detect low levels of mutant species in a mixed population, relative to conventional sequencing. Further advantages of this technique include the rapid and high-throughput nature of the assay, the accuracy of the assay relative to conventional DNA sequencing, and the convenience of combining RT-PCR virus amplification with the allelic discrimination assay, without the need for purification of PCR products.