1. Data documenting the performance of the PT/INR line correction method for reconciling INR discrepancies between central laboratory coagulation analyzers using different thromboplastins during the evaluation of a portable Coagulometer
- Author
-
Megan A. Berman, Peggy A. Mann, Wendy S. Baker, Jaime Unabia, Kathleen J. Albright, Heidi Spratt, and John R. Petersen
- Subjects
Multidisciplinary ,Correction method ,business.industry ,Medicine and Dentistry ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,lcsh:Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics ,Patient care ,Measurement site ,Central laboratory ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,lcsh:R858-859.7 ,Medicine ,Research article ,In patient ,lcsh:Science (General) ,Nuclear medicine ,business ,Anticoagulation clinic ,Coagulation analyzers ,lcsh:Q1-390 - Abstract
The data presented here was produced as part of an evaluation of the performance of the CoaguChek XS point-of-care coagulation analyzer, which is discussed in the research article “POCT PT INR – Is it adequate for Patient Care? A Comparison of the Roche Coaguchek XS vs. Stago Star vs. Siemens BCS in Patients Routinely Seen in an Anticoagulation Clinic” (Baker et al., in press) [1] . An effort to reconcile discrepancies in the patient INR result distributions from different central lab instruments (Stago Star and Siemens BCS) with the PT/INR line method is described (Poller et al., 2010, 2011; Ibrahim et al., 2011) [2] , [3] , [4] . While regression analysis of the ECAA Poller calibrant data provided a linear PT/INR line for all methods, Pearson's chi-squared and one-way repeated measures ANOVA analyses showed that central lab INR measurements continued to exhibit measurement site dependence after the PT/INR line correction was applied. According to paired t-test analysis, only the human thromboplastin dependent methods (CoaguChek XS and Siemens BCS both before and after PT/INR line correction) showed statistically significant agreement (p-value >0.05).
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF