1. Factors Affecting Soft and Hard Tissues Around Two-Piece Transmucosal Implants: A 3-Year Prospective Cohort Study
- Author
-
Chiara Pirani, Fausto Zamparini, Carlo Prati, Luigi Canullo, Daniele Botticelli, Maria Giovanna Gandolfi, Prati C., Zamparini F., Canullo L., Pirani C., Botticelli D., and Gandolfi M.G.
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Radiography ,Bleeding on probing ,Dentistry ,Esthetics, Dental ,hyperbolic neck ,Bone tissue ,single implant ,Crown (dentistry) ,03 medical and health sciences ,Dental Implants, Single-Tooth ,0302 clinical medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Single-Blind Method ,Prospective Studies ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Prospective cohort study ,Survival rate ,prospective cohort study ,transmucosal placement ,business.industry ,Dental Implantation, Endosseous ,Soft tissue ,030206 dentistry ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,Dental Implantation, Endosseou ,flapless procedure ,Prospective Studie ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Female ,Implant ,Oral Surgery ,medicine.symptom ,business ,Human - Abstract
Purpose:This 3-year study aimed to evaluate hard and soft tissue modification around a two-piece implant characterized by a transmucosal hyperbolic neck in healthy consecutive patients with a need for single-tooth replacement. Materials and Methods: Two-piece implants (n = 66) were placed with a flapless technique in 56 patients (27 men; 29 women; mean age 55 ± 9 years): 16 immediately after root extraction (immediate group), 20 after 8 to 12 weeks (early group), and 30 after 10 or more months (delayed group). The transmucosal hyperbolic neck was exposed 1 to 1.5 mm above gingival level. Customized abutments were positioned 3 months later with the implant-abutment connection located approximately 1 to 1.5 mm above soft tissue level. Provisional cemented resin crowns were designed with the finishing line at the hyperbolic neck and then positioned to avoid excessive compression of soft tissue, to guide gingival contours. Twenty days later, a definitive metal-ceramic crown was cemented. In all patients, the gingival biotype (thin or thick) was also evaluated. The primary outcomes were as follows: 36-month implant survival rate, peri-implant marginal bone level (MBL, in mm) changes observed in single-blind on radiographs at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months (T1, T3, T6, T12, T24, and T36), and pink esthetic score (PES) at T6, T12, and T36 to analyze soft tissue adaptation after loading and crown application. The secondary outcomes were as follows: plaque score and bleeding on probing (BOP). Linear regression models and multilevel mixed logistic regression were used to detect any statistical difference of MBL according to operative parameters. Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) on ranks was performed to assess statistical differences of PES at T6, T12, and T36. Results: The survival rate was 100%. The dropout rate was 1.79%. No infections, mucositis, or peri-implantitis were reported. Implants placed in thick-biotype tissues showed a statistically different lower bone loss at 36 months with respect to the thin biotype (P
- Published
- 2020