1. Vessel fractional flow reserve (vFFR) for the assessment of stenosis severity: the FAST II study
- Author
-
Kaneshka Masdjedi, Wijnand K den Dekker, Eric Van Belle, Ernest Spitzer, Ziad A. Ali, Felix Zijlstra, Jeroen Wilschut, Nobuhiro Tanaka, Axel Linke, Sina Porouchani, Felix Woitek, Eric Boersma, Joost Daemen, Roberto Diletti, Nicolas M. Van Mieghem, Antonio L. Bartorelli, and Cardiology
- Subjects
Coronary angiography ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Constriction, Pathologic ,Fractional flow reserve ,Coronary Angiography ,Severity of Illness Index ,Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ,Clinical Research ,Predictive Value of Tests ,Internal medicine ,Humans ,Medicine ,Prospective Studies ,business.industry ,Coronary Stenosis ,Percutaneous coronary intervention ,medicine.disease ,Coronary Vessels ,Predictive value ,Pressure wire ,Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial ,Stenosis ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Conventional PCI ,Cardiology ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Artery - Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is superior to angiography-guided PCI. The clinical uptake of FFR has been limited, however, by the need to advance a wire in the coronary artery, the additional time required and the need for hyperaemic agents which can cause patient discomfort. FFR derived from routine coronary angiography eliminates these issues. AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance and accuracy of three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography (3D-QCA)-based vessel FFR (vFFR) compared to pressure wire-based FFR (≤0.80). METHODS: The FAST II (Fast Assessment of STenosis severity) study was a prospective observational multicentre study designed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of vFFR compared to the reference standard (pressure wire-based FFR ≤0.80). A total of 334 patients from six centres were enrolled. Both site-determined and blinded independent core lab vFFR measurements were compared to FFR. RESULTS: The core lab vFFR was 0.83±0.09 and pressure wire-based FFR 0.83±0.08. A good correlation was found between core lab vFFR and pressure wire-based FFR (R=0.74; p
- Published
- 2022