1. Perceptions on Use of the Subjective Global Assessment Before and After It Became Part of Regular Practice
- Author
-
Celia Laur, Bridget Davidson, and Heather H. Keller
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Attitude of Health Personnel ,030309 nutrition & dietetics ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Nutritional Status ,Medicine (miscellaneous) ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Nursing ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,Perception ,Acute care ,Outcome Assessment, Health Care ,medicine ,Humans ,Nutritionists ,Baseline (configuration management) ,Qualitative Research ,reproductive and urinary physiology ,Aged ,media_common ,0303 health sciences ,Nutrition and Dietetics ,business.industry ,Malnutrition ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Hospitals ,female genital diseases and pregnancy complications ,Nutrition Assessment ,Practice Guidelines as Topic ,Female ,030211 gastroenterology & hepatology ,Training needs ,Thematic analysis ,business ,Delivery of Health Care ,Qualitative research ,Overall efficiency - Abstract
Background Subjective global assessment (SGA) is a standardized diagnostic tool for malnutrition and identifies those who would benefit from nutrition treatment. SGA has been validated in several patient populations; however, implementation in clinical practice is inconsistent. The objective of this study was to understand and contrast the perceptions on use of SGA before and after it became a regular practice for hospital dietitians. Methods The More-2-Eat implementation project provided the opportunity to undertake this qualitative study, as 5 hospitals adopted INPAC (Integrated Nutrition Pathway for Acute Care), which includes the use of SGA. Between 2015 and 2018, interviews were conducted with dietitians at baseline (n = 9), a year after implementation (n = 18), and a year after project completion (n = 6). Thematic analysis was conducted. Results Themes before SGA adoption included a desire for a malnutrition diagnosis and care planning; lacking comfort in use of SGA; and reflecting on SGA training needs. After a year of implementing INPAC and a year after project completion, themes described becoming a better clinician; allowing dietitians to see the right people, sooner; recognizing the variability in the treatment path for mildly/moderately malnourished (SGA B) patients; improving overall efficiency in delivery of care; and establishing policy and procedures to sustain and spread use of SGA. Conclusion Initially, dietitians were hesitant to use SGA. Adoption through a focused implementation study and experience with implementation of SGA changed these perceptions. Understanding these perceptions before and after use may support adoption of this useful diagnostic tool.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF