1. Prognostic approach to Class III malocclusion through case-based reasoning.
- Author
-
Auconi P, Ottaviani E, Barelli E, Giuntini V, McNamara JA, and Franchi L
- Subjects
- Cephalometry, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Mandible, Palate, Prognosis, Malocclusion, Malocclusion, Angle Class III diagnostic imaging
- Abstract
Objective: This investigation evaluates the evidence of case-based reasoning (CBR) in providing additional information on the prediction of future Class III craniofacial growth., Settings and Sample Population: The craniofacial characteristics of 104 untreated Class III subjects (7-17 years of age), monitored with two lateral cephalograms obtained during the growth process, were evaluated., Materials and Methods: Data were compared with the skeletal characteristics of subjects who showed a high degree of skeletal imbalance ('prototypes') obtained from a large data set of 1263 Class III cross-sectional subjects (7-17 years of age)., Results: The degree of similarity of longitudinal subjects with the most unbalanced prototypes allowed the identification of subjects who would develop a subsequent unfavourable skeletal growth (accuracy: 81%). The angle between the palatal plane and the sella-nasion line (PP-SN angle) and the Wits appraisal were two additional craniofacial features involved in the early prediction of the adverse progression of the Class III skeletal imbalance., Conclusions: Case-based reasoning methodology, which uses a personalized inference method, may bring additional information to approximate the skeletal progression of Class III malocclusion., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF