Search

Introduction: HER2 mutations are reported to occur in 2%-5% of all cases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The clinical outcomes in patients with HER2-mutant NSCLC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus platinum-based chemotherapy as 1st line treatment still remain unclear., Methods: Using the large-scale clinico-genomic database of LC-SCRUM-Asia, the clinico-genomic characteristics and therapeutic outcomes of patients with HER2-mutant NSCLC were investigated., Results: Of the 15,251 patients with NSCLC enrolled in the LC-SCRUM-Asia database, tumor HER2 mutations were detected in 402 patients (2.6 %). The most common subtype of HER2 mutations was exon 20 in-frame insertions (79 %), followed in frequency by mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain other than Exon20ins (10 %) and mutations in extracellular domains (7 %). NSCLCs harboring HER2 mutations showed a higher tumor mutation burden (TMB) as compared with NSCLCs harboring EGFR mutations or ALK fusions (median: 4.22 vs. 2.54 and 2.52 mutation per megabase, respectively). Of the 402 patients, 268 patients had received platinum-based chemotherapy with ICIs (Chemo-ICI, n = 95) or without ICI (Chemo-alone, n = 173) as 1st line treatment. The progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer in the Chemo-ICI group as compared with the Chemo-alone group (median 8.5 vs. 6.3 months; HR [95 %CI]: 0.66 [0.50-0.88]; P < 0.005). Multivariate analysis identified use of ICIs in addition to platinum-based chemotherapy as an independent favorable prognostic factor for PFS. There was no significant difference in the overall survival between the patients of the Chemo-ICI and Chemo-alone groups (median 31.1 vs. 23.3 months; HR [95 %CI]: 0.80 [0.57-1.12], P = 0.20)., Conclusions: Addition of ICIs to platinum-based chemotherapy in 1st line treatment may improve the PFS in patients with HER2-mutant NSCLC. The relatively high TMB might be involved in the prolongation of the PFS in patients with HER2-mutant NSCLC receiving platinum-based chemotherapy with ICIs., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Hibiki Udagawa reports grants from Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd., Amgen K.K., Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. And MSD K.K. and honoraria for lectures from DAIICHI SANKYO COMPANY, LIMITED, CHUGAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., Novartis Pharma K.K., Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., and MSD K.K. outside the current study. Shingo Matsumoto reports grants from Merck, Chugai Pharmaceutical, MSD and Janssen Pharmaceutical and honoraria for lectures from Eli Lilly outside the current study. Hiroki Izumi reports grants from Amgen, Eisai, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co, Bristol-Myers Squibb Japan, Chugai, AstraZeneca, Ono Pharmaceutical Co, MSD and Merck outside the current study. Yuichiro Ohe reports grants from AstraZeneca, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Kirin, Sumitomo, Pfizer, Taiho, Novartis, Takeda, Daiichi-Sankyo and Janssen and honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca, Chugai, Chugai, ONO, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Pfizer, MSD, Taiho, Nippon Kayaku, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Eisai and Daiichi-Sankyo and payment for expert testimony from AstraZeneca, Chugai, ONO, BMS, Kyorin, Celltrion, Amgen, Nippon Kayaku, Boehringer Ingelheim, AnHeart Therapeutics Inc., PharmaMar outside the current study. Terufumi Kato reports grants from Abbvie, Amgen, Arrivent, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BeiGene, BluePrint, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Haihe, Janssen, Merck KGaA, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron and Takeda and honoraria for lectures from Amgen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck KGaA, MSD, Novartis, Ono, Pfizer, Taiho, and Takeda and other from AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Janssen, Merck KGaA, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer outside the current study. His spouse is an employer of Eli Lilly. Kazumi Nishino reports grants from ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., TAIHO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., MSD, AbbVie, DAIICHI SANKYO COMPANY, LIMITED, Amgen, Eisai Co., Ltd., Sanofi K.K., Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Eli Lilly Japan, Merck Biopharma Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd., AstraZeneca, Merus NV, Gilead Sciences, CHUGAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD, Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd and AMGEN and honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly Japan, MSD, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Merck Biopharma Co., Ltd., Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Bristol Myers Squibb, Nippon Kayaku, ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd., CHUGAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD, AMGEN, DAIICHI SANKYO COMPANY, LIMITED, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd. outside the current study. Yuki Sato reports honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca, MSD, Novartis, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Nippon Kayaku, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Takeda, Kyowa Kirin, Daiichi Sankyo and Boehringer Ingelheim outside the current study. Ryo Toyozawa reports grants from Abbvie, Amgen, AnHeart Therapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly Japan, MSD, Novartis Pharma, Pfizer Japan and Takeda Pharmaceutical and honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly Japan, MSD, Nippon Kayaku, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer Japan, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical and Thermo Fisher Scientific outside the current study. Koichi Azuma reports honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca K.K., Ono Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical, MSD, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Takeda Pharmaceutical outside the current study. Tetsuya Sakai reports grants from Amgen, GlaxoSmithKline K.K, Daiichi Sankyo and NEC and honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Takeda, OLYMPUS, Taiho, Chugai, MSD, Merck, Daiichi Sankyo, RIKEN GENESIS and Amco outside the current study. Yuji Shibata reports grants from MSD, Blueprint Medicines Corporation and Novartis and honoraria for lectures from Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Chugai, Takeda, Merck and Eli Lilly Japan outside the current study. Kaname Nosaki reports grants from Takeda, AstraZeneca, MSD K.K, Abbvie, Chugai Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo/UCB Japan and AnHeart Therapeutics and honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharma, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Janssen, Ono Pharmaceutical, Takeda, Novartis and Merck outside the current study. Yoshitaka Zenke reports grants from AstraZeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo, Amgen, GSK, Roche, MSD and Merck and honoraria for lectures from AstraZenca, Lilly, Chugai, Ono, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Takeda, Boheringer-Ingelheim, Taiho, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Nihon Kayaku, Kyowa Kirin and Amgen outside the current study. Shigeki Umemura reports grants from Taiho pharmaceutical, Lilly and MSD and honoraria for lectures from MSD, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Takeda, AstraZeneca and Daiichi sankyo outside the current study. Kiyotaka Yoh reports grants from Abbvie, Amgen, ArriVent Biopharma, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai Pharma, Daiichi sankyo, Lilly, MSD, Taiho and Takeda and consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Abbvie and honoraria for lectures from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharma, Daiichi sankyo, Kyowa kirin, Lilly, MSD, Ono Pharmaceutical and Takeda outside the current study. Masahiro Seike reports grants from Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Taiho Pharmaceutical and Nippon Kayaku and honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Nippon Kayaku, Daiichi-Sankyo, Merck Biopharma, MSD K.K, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Novartis and Amgen inc outside the current study. Koichi Goto reports grants from Amgen K.K., Astellas Pharma Inc., AstraZeneca K.K., Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd., Bristol-Myers Squibb K.K., CHUGAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., DAIICHI SANKYO COMPANY, LIMITED, Eisai Co., Ltd., Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd., Merck Biopharma Co., Ltd., MEDICAL& BIOLOGICAL LABORATORIES CO., LTD., MSD K.K., Novartis Pharma K.K., ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., Pfizer R&D Japan G.K., Sumitomo Pharma Co., Ltd., Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd., Merus N.V. and Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. for the present manuscript. Koichi Goto also reports grants from Amgen Inc., AbbVie GK, AnHeart Therapeutics Inc., Blueprint Medicines Corporation., Craif Inc., Guardant Health Asia, Middle East & Africa, Inc, Haihe Biopharma Co., Ltd., Ignyta,Inc., Life Technologies Japan Ltd., Loxo Oncology, Inc., Lunit Inc., Precision Medicine Asia Co., Ltd., RIKEN GENESIS CO., LTD., Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sysmex Corporation., Turning Point Therapeutics,Inc. and honoraria for lectures from Amgen K.K., Amoy Diagnosties Co.,Ltd., AstraZeneca K.K., Bayer U.S., Bristol-Myers Squibb K.K., CHUGAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., DAIICHI SANKYO COMPANY, LIMITED, Eisai Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Guardant Health Japan Corp., iTeos Therapeutics Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Thermo Fisher Scientific K.K., Merck Biopharma Co., Ltd., Nippon Kayaku Co.,Ltd., Novartis Pharma K.K., ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., Pharma Mar, S.A., RIKEN GENESIS CO., LTD., Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. And Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. And other from Amgen Inc., Amgen K.K., AstraZeneca K.K., Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb K.K., DAIICHI SANKYO COMPANY, LIMITED, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., GlaxoSmithKline K.K., Haihe Biopharma Co., Ltd., Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K. and SYNEOS HEALTH CLINICAL K.K. Other authors report no potential conflict of interest to disclose.., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The combination of platinum-based chemotherapy and an antibody to PD-1 or to its ligand PD-L1, with or without an antibody to CTLA-4, has improved the survival of individuals with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, no randomised controlled trial has evaluated the survival benefit of adding a CTLA-4 inhibitor to platinum-based chemotherapy plus a PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor., Methods: This open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial was conducted at 48 hospitals in Japan. Eligible patients were aged 20 years or older with previously untreated advanced NSCLC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients with known driver oncogenes were excluded. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive platinum-based chemotherapy (four cycles) plus pembrolizumab (pembrolizumab group) or platinum-based chemotherapy (two cycles) plus nivolumab-ipilimumab (nivolumab-ipilimumab group). The primary endpoint was overall survival and assessed in all randomly assigned patients on an intention-to-treat basis. The trial is registered in the Japan Registry for Clinical Trials, jRCTs031210013, and is now closed to new enrolment and is ongoing., Findings: Between patient accrual initiation on April 6, 2021, and discontinuation of the trial on March 30, 2023, 11 (7%) of 148 patients in the nivolumab-ipilimumab group had a treatment-related death. Because of the high number of treatment-related deaths, patient accrual was terminated early, resulting in 295 patients (236 [80%] male and 59 [20%] female) enrolled; the primary analysis was done on the basis of 117 deaths (fewer than the required 329 deaths). By May 25, 2023 (data cutoff), overall survival did not differ significantly between the nivolumab-ipilimumab group and the pembrolizumab group (median 23·7 months [95% CI 17·6-not estimable] vs 20·5 months [17·6-not estimable], respectively; hazard ratio 0·98 [90% CI 0·72-1·34]; p=0·46). Non-haematological adverse events of grade 3 or worse occurred in 87 (60%) of 146 patients in the nivolumab-ipilimumab group and 59 (41%) of 144 patients in the pembrolizumab group. The pembrolizumab group tended to have a better quality of life compared with the nivolumab-ipilimumab group., Interpretation: The safety and efficacy data suggest an unfavourable benefit-risk profile for nivolumab-ipilimumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy relative to pembrolizumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC, although a definitive conclusion awaits an updated analysis of overall survival., Funding: The National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund and Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests YoS has received grants from Chugai Pharmaceutical; and personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Kyowa Kirin, all outside of the submitted work. ShN has received grants from AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical, and MSD; consulting fees from Asahi Kasei Pharma; and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Kyowa Hakko Bio, and MSD, all outside of the submitted work. SS has received grants from AnHeart Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical, MSD, Daiichi Sankyo, Bristol Myers Squibb, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Ono Pharmaceutical, AbbVie, Amgen, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda, Accerise, and Parexel International; and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Kyowa Kirin, Takeda, Nippon Kayaku, Merck, Amgen, AbbVie, Otsuka, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Towa Pharmaceutical, Sysmex, and Eisai, all outside of the submitted work. HidehH has received research fundings from MSD, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ono Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, Chugai Pharmaceutical, and Roche; personal fees from AstraZeneca, MSD, Eli Lilly, Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Roche, Amgen, and Abbvie; and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Roche, Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, and AbbVie (served on the advisory board), all outside of the submitted work. YaY has received personal fees from Taiho Pharmaceutical and Takeda, all outside of the submitted work. HidetH has received grants from IQVIA Services Japan, Eisai, Syneos Health Clinical, EP-CRSU, EPS, Shionogi, Nippon Kayaku, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Takeda, GSK, MSD, Sanofi, Amgen, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, SRL Medisearch, Janssen Pharmaceutical, PRA Health Sciences, CMIC, Astellas Pharma, Pfizer R&D Japan, Ascent Development Services, Labcorp Development Japan, Eisai, Kobayashi Pharmaceutical, Bayer, and Pfizer Japan; royalties or licenses from Sysmex; personal fees from Ono Pharmaceutical, Merck, Daiichi Sankyo, 3H Clinical Trial, AstraZeneca, Novartis Pharma, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly Japan, Amgen, MSD, Sysmex, Pfizer Japan, Takeda, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim; and personal fees for serving on an advisory board from Daiichi Sankyo, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Novocure, Eli Lilly Japan, Gilead Science, and Blueprint Medicine, all outside of the submitted work. KA has received lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Ono Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical, MSD, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Takeda, all outside of the submitted work. SN has received grants from GSK, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Teijin, Kyowa Kirin, Shionogi, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Kyorin, and Nippon Kayaku; personal fees from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo, MSD, Ono Pharmaceutical, Eisai, Kyorin, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Amgen, Merck, Nippon Kayaku, and Kyowa Kirin; and personal fees for serving on advisory boards from AstraZeneca and Daiichi Sankyo, all outside of the submitted work. RM has received personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo, Chugai Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly Japan, MSD, Amgen, and Merck; and personal fees for serving on an advisory board from Daiichi Sankyo, all outside of the submitted work. MY has received grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly Japan, MSD, Nippon Kayaku, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Takeda; and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly Japan, Johnson & Johnson, MSD, Nippon Kayaku, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer Japan, and Taiho Pharmaceutical, all outside of the submitted work. TY has received grants from MSD, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, Takeda, Delta-Fly Pharma, Janssen, AbbVie, Daiichi Sankyo, and Parexel International; and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly Japan, Pfizer Japan, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ono Pharmaceutical, Takeda, Nippon Kayaku, MSD, Novartis, and Merck, all outside of the submitted work. KY has received grants from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Takeda; and personal fees from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin, Lilly, Merck Serono, Novartis, Ono Pharmaceutical, Otsuka, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Takeda, all outside of the submitted work. TakayK has received grants from AstraZeneca, Amgen, MSD, Janssen, Takeda, and Daiichi Sankyo; and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, MSD, Pfizer, and Nippon Kayaku, all outside of the submitted work. HO has received grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, and Taiho Pharmaceutical, all outside of the submitted work. TakasK has received personal fees from MSD, AstraZeneca, Ono Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical, and Bristol Myers Squibb, all outside of the submitted work. KK has received personal fees from AstraZeneca, MSD, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly Japan, and Taiho Pharmaceutical; payment for expert testimony from Eli Lilly Japan; and personal fees for serving on advisory boards from Eli Lilly Japan and AstraZeneca, all outside of the submitted work. YF has received personal fees from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Takeda, and Taiho Pharmaceutical; payment for expert testimony from Chiome Bioscience, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, and Ono Pharmaceutical; and personal fees for serving on advisory boards from AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Micron, and Ono Pharmaceutical, all outside of the submitted work. SM has received grants from AstraZeneca, Takeda, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Sanofi, MSD, Daiichi Sankyo, Ono Pharmaceutical, and Janssen; and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Takeda, Eli Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Novartis, and Taiho Pharmaceutical, all outside of the submitted work. SK has received personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Ono Pharmaceutical, and Guardant Health Japan, all outside of the submitted work. HA reports grants from Amgen and Chugai Pharmaceutical; personal fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly Japan, MSD, Nippon Kayaku, Novartis, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Takeda, and Taiho Pharmaceutical; personal fees for serving on advisory boards from Amgen, MSD, Janssen, and Sandoz; and a role on the WCLC Patient Advocacy Committee, all outside of the submitted work. HK has received grants from Eli Lilly; and personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, MSD, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Eli Lilly Japan, Ono Pharmaceutical, and Takeda, all outside of the submitted work. ToshiK has received grants from Chugai Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly Japan, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ono Pharmaceutical, MSD, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Merck, Daiichi Sankyo, Amgen, AbbVie, Sanofi, Eisai, Labcorp Development Japan, IQVIA Services Japan, Gilead Sciences, Pfizer, and Bayer; consulting fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer Japan, Daiichi Sankyo, Bayer, and AbbVie; and personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly Japan, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ono Pharmaceutical, MSD, Pfizer Japan, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, Nippon Kayaku, Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, Takeda, Bayer, Sawai, Amgen, and Eisai, all outside of the submitted work. HF has received grants from the National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund; and lecture fees from Kyowa Kirin, Chugai Pharmaceutical, and CMIC, all outside of the submitted work. YO reports grants from AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, LOXO, Kirin, Sumitomo, Pfizer, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Novartis, Takeda, Kissei, Daiichi Sankyo, and Janssen; personal fees from AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Pfizer, MSD, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Nippon Kayaku, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Eisai, and Daiichi Sankyo; payment for expert testimony from AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, Kyorin, Celltrion, Amgen, Nippon Kayaku, Boehringer Ingelheim, AnHeart Therapeutics, and PharmaMar; personal fees for serving on an advisory board from Haihe Biopharma; and roles in the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology, Japan Lung Cancer Society, and Japan Clinical Oncology Group, all outside of the submitted work. IO has received grants from the National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund and Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development during the conduct of the study; grants from AstraZeneca, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ono Pharmaceutical, MSD, Eli Lilly, Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, and AbbVie; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, and AbbVie; and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ono Pharmaceutical, MSD, Eli Lilly, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Chugai Pharmaceutical, and Pfizer, all outside of the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Background: The treatment of lung cancer has made dramatic progress in the past decade, but due to the high cost of drugs, the total pharmaceutical cost has been rising explosively. There are currently no data available in Japan on which regimens are used, to what extent they are used, and what their total cost is., Methods: Sixty Japanese centers belonging to the Lung Cancer Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group were surveyed for information about the first-line treatment for advanced lung cancer in practice from July 2021 to June 2022. Three types of cancer were included: driver gene mutation-negative NSCLC, EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC, and extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC)., Results: Recent treatment costs for ICIs or ICI plus chemotherapy were about 20-55 times higher than those for conventional chemotherapy. Of the 3738 patients with driver gene aberration-negative NSCLC, 2573 (68.8%) received treatments with monthly cost of 500 000 Japanese yen (JPY) or more; 2555 (68.4%) received ICI therapy. Of the 1486 patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC, 1290 (86.8%) received treatments with a monthly cost of 500 000 JPY or more; 1207 (81.2%) received osimertinib. ICI treatments with a monthly cost of 500 000 JPY or more were administered to 607 (56.3%) of 1079 patients with ES-SCLC. Elderly NSCLC patients received slightly more high-cost treatment than younger patients., Conclusion: Recent treatments cost many times more than conventional chemotherapy. This study revealed that high-cost treatments were widely used in advanced lung cancer and some of high-cost treatments were used despite the lack of clear evidence. Physicians should pay attention to the cost of treatments they use., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Mobocertinib is a novel, synthetic, orally administered tyrosine kinase inhibitor that inhibits many activated forms of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), including those containing exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) mutations. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of mobocertinib in Japanese patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR ex20ins mutations., Methods: This was a phase 2, open-label study. Patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR ex20ins mutations who had not had previous systemic treatment received mobocertinib 160 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was the confirmed objective response rate. A planned interim analysis was completed for the first 14 patients with a centrally confirmed EGFR ex20ins mutation, with enrollment stopped if the number of patients with an objective response was five or fewer., Results: In total, 33 patients were enrolled into the study (63.6% women; median age: 66 years). At the interim analysis, the objective response rate evaluated by a central independent review committee was 28.6% (4/14, 90% confidence interval: 10.4-54.0); therefore, enrollment was stopped for futility. In the full analysis set, the objective response rate was 18.2% (6/33, 95% confidence interval: 7.0-35.5); of the six responders, one patient (3.0%) had a complete response and five patients (15.2%) had partial responses. The most common treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea, paronychia, stomatitis, and nausea., Conclusion: Although study enrollment was terminated early owing to futility, our results showed modest activity of mobocertinib in Japanese patients with NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins mutations with no additional safety concerns., (© 2024. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited.)

Background: MET exon 14 skipping mutations occur in 3-4% and MET high amplifications occur in < 1% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Crizotinib, a selective ATP-competitive small-molecule inhibitor of c-Met, ALK, and ROS1 tyrosine kinases, has shown activity in cancer models with various types of MET activation., Methods: The Co-MET study is a single-arm phase 2 trial to assess the safety and efficacy of crizotinib in MET inhibitor-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC harboring MET exon 14 skipping mutation (cohort 1) or high MET gene copy number of ≥ 7 (cohort 2). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1 by independent radiology review in cohort 1. The key secondary endpoints were the duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety., Results: A total of 28 patients (23 in cohort 1 and 5 in cohort 2) were enrolled between March 2018 and February 2020. The primary endpoint was met as the ORR (90% confidence interval: CI) in cohort 1 was 38.1% (20.6-58.3). Median DoR, PFS, and OS (95% CI) were 7.6 (1.9-NE), 5.7 (2.1-11.3), 9.1 (4.0-19.9) months, respectively, in cohort 1. ORR in cohort 2 was 40.0% (18.9-92.4). The safety signals were generally consistent with the known safety profile of crizotinib., Conclusions: Crizotinib showed a clinical activity similar to that of tepotinib and capmatinib in patients with NSCLC harboring MET exon 14 skipping mutations., Clinical Trial Information: UMIN000031623., (© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.)

Background: Brigatinib is a next-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeting ALK and ROS1. The Barossa study is a multicenter, phase II basket study of brigatinib in patients with ROS1-rearranged solid tumors. ROS1 TKI-naive patients with ROS1-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were enrolled in cohort 1, and ROS1-rearranged NSCLC patients treated previously with crizotinib were enrolled in cohort 2. Patients with ROS1-rearranged solid tumors other than NSCLC were enrolled in cohort 3., Patients and Methods: Eligible patients received brigatinib at the dose of 180 mg once daily with a 7-day lead-in period at 90 mg. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (RECIST 1.1) assessed by independent central review in cohorts 1 and 2., Results: Between July 2019 and June 2021, 51 patients were enrolled into the study. Of the 51, 47 patients had ROS1-rearranged NSCLC; 28 and 19 of these patients were enrolled in cohort 1 and cohort 2, respectively. The remaining four patients had other ROS1-rearranged solid tumors, including rectal, brain, and pancreas tumor in one patient each, and primary unknown tumor in one patient. The confirmed objective response rate was 71.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 51.3% to 86.8%] in cohort 1 (TKI-naive NSCLC patients) and 31.6% (95% CI 12.6% to 56.6%) in cohort 2 (NSCLC patients treated previously with crizotinib). The median progression-free survival was 12.0 months (95% CI 5.5-22.9 months) in cohort 1 and 7.3 months (95% CI 1.3-17.5 months) in cohort 2. None of the patients in cohort 3 showed any treatment response. Pneumonitis was observed in 9.8% of all the patients., Conclusions: Brigatinib was effective in TKI-naive patients with ROS1-rearranged NSCLC. The safety profile of brigatinib was consistent with that reported from previous studies., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Osimertinib is the standard of care for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-activating mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer. Dose-toxicity has been previously reported, but no dose-response data within the range of 20-240 mg daily (mg/d). Thus, the current 80 mg/d dosing might be too high for elderly Japanese patients with an average body weight of only 50 kg, resulting in excessive toxicity and cost. We therefore initiated a study to investigate whether osimertinib at 40 mg/d is non-inferior to 80 mg/d in patients with advanced or recurrent epidermal growth factor receptor-activating mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer aged ≥70 years, using a regression discontinuity design. Osimertinib is administered at 40 mg/d for body weight ≤50 kg, and 80 mg/d for body weight >50 kg. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival. Sample size is 550 patients, based on a non-inferiority margin of the progression-free survival hazard ratio 1.333, 0.10 one-sided type I error and 80% power., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Pembrolizumab plus epacadostat (indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-1 inhibitor) was well tolerated in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors in part A of the nonrandomized, open-label, phase 1 KEYNOTE-434 study (NCT02862457). We report results from part B, which evaluated epacadostat plus pembrolizumab and chemotherapy in Japanese patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: Eligible patients aged ≥ 20 years had histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IIIB or IV NSCLC with no prior systemic therapy, and ECOG performance status of 0 or 1. Patients received epacadostat 100 mg orally twice-daily, pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every-3-weeks for ≤ 35 cycles, and 4 cycles of chemotherapy (cohort 1: cisplatin plus pemetrexed, non-squamous; cohort 2: carboplatin plus pemetrexed, non-squamous; cohort 3: carboplatin plus paclitaxel, squamous or non-squamous). Primary endpoint was incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Following unfavorable results from other studies, a protocol amendment removed epacadostat from the treatment combination., Results: Of 19 patients, 7 were enrolled in cohort 1, and 6 each in cohorts 2 and 3. Median follow-up was 13.7 (range, 4.2-27.8) months. Five of 17 (29%) DLT-evaluable patients experienced ≥ 1 DLT (cohort 1, n = 1; cohorts 2 and 3, n = 2 each); most commonly maculopapular rash (grade 3, n = 3) and increased alanine aminotransferase (grade 2, n = 1; grade 3, n = 2). All patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (AEs); 58% experienced grade 3 or 4 treatment-related AEs. Objective response rate was 47%., Conclusion: The combination of epacadostat plus pembrolizumab and chemotherapy was found to be tolerable in Japanese patients with advanced NSCLC., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02862457., (© 2023. Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA and its affiliates.)

Objectives: In this study, we explored the clinical outcomes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR Exon20 in-frame insertions (Exon20ins), and the impact of the location of Exon20ins on these clinical outcomes., Materials and Methods: The efficacies of current systemic therapies in NSCLC patients harboring Exon20ins were investigated using a large-scale clinico-genomic database of LC-SCRUM-Asia, and compared with that of amivantamab in the CHRYSALIS trial., Results: Of the 11,397 patients enrolled in LC-SCRUM-Asia, Exon20ins were detected in 189 patients (1.7 %). Treatment with classical EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (classical TKIs) was associated with a significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) in NSCLC patients with Exon20ins as compared with Exon19 deletions and L858R. Post platinum-based chemotherapy, classical TKIs and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were associated with a shorter PFS than with docetaxel in patients with Exon20ins (HR [95 % CI]; TKIs vs docetaxel, 2.16 [1.35-3.46]; ICIs vs docetaxel, 1.49 [1.21-1.84]). Patients treated with amivantamab in the CHRYSALIS trial showed a risk reduction in PFS and overall survival as compared with LC-SCRUM-Asia patients treated with docetaxel, classical TKIs, or ICIs. Among the 189 patients, Exon20ins were classified as near-loop or far-loop insertions in 115 (61 %) and 56 (30 %) patients, respectively. Treatment with osimertinib was associated with a longer PFS in patients with Exon20ins in near-loop as compared with far-loop (median, 5.6 vs. 2.0 months; HR [95 % CI], 0.22 [0.07-0.64])., Conclusions: After platinum-based chemotherapy, classical TKIs and ICIs are less effective in NSCLC patients with Exon20ins, and amivantamab may be a promising targeted therapy. There is a possibility that the location of Exon20ins has an impact on the efficacy of TKIs., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Hibiki Udagawa reports grants from Takeda and Boehringer Ingelheim outside the current study. Shingo Matsumoto reports grants from Chugai Pharmaceutical, MSD and Janssen Pharmaceutical and honoraria for lectures from Merck and Eli Lilly outside the current study. Terufumi Kato reports grants from Abbvie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, BluePrint, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Haihe, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Takeda and Turning Point and honoraria for lectures from Amgen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Pharmaceutical, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Ono, Pfizer, Taiho, and Takeda and other from AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Daiichi-Sankyo, Janssen Pharmaceutical, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and Eli Lilly outside the current study. Hiroshi Yokouchi reports grants from AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Takeda, Daiichi-Sankyo, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Abbvie, Amgen and Taiho and honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca outside the current study. Naoki Furuya reports honoraria for lectures from Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Bristol Myers Squibb, Taiho, Pfizer and Novartis. Ryo Toyozawa reports grants from Abbvie, Amgen, AnHeart Therapeutics, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and Takeda and honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Ono, Pfizer, Taiho, and Takeda outside the current study. Kadoaki Ohashi reports grants from Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly and Novartis and honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Kyowa Kirin and Novartis and other from Momotaro-gene, Genentech and Novartis outside the current study. Kazumi Nishino reports grants from Abbvie, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Daiichi-Sankyo, Janssen Pharmaceutical, Merck, Merus, MSD, Novartis, Ono, Pfizer, Sanofi, Taiho, and Takeda and honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Janssen Pharmaceutical, Merk, Nippon Kayaku, Pfizer and Roche Diagnostics and other from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly and Pfizer outside the current study. Atsushi Nakamura reports honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Taiho, Merck, Nippon Kayaku, Novartis, Pfizer and Thermo Fisher Scientific outside the current study. Eiji Iwama reports honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Chugai, Life Technologies, Novartis, Pfizer and Takeda outside the current study. Seiji Niho reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Kyowa Kirin, Nippon Kayaku, Ono, Shionogi, Taiho and Teijin Pharma and honoraria for lectures from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Janssen Pharmaceutical, Kyorin, MSD, Nippon Kayaku, Novartis, Ono, Pfizer, Taiho and Takeda outside the current study. Tetsuya Sakai reports honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca, Chugai, Merck, MSD, Novartis and Thermo Fisher Scientific outside the current study. Yuji Shibata reports grants from Blueprint, MSD and Novartis and honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Merck, Ono, Pfizer and Takeda outside the current study. Hiroki Izumi reports grants from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Eisai, MSD, Merck, Ono and Takeda outside the current study. Kaname Nosaki reports grants from Abbvie, AnHeart Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, MSD and Takeda and honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Janssen Pharmaceutical, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Ono, Pfizer, Taiho and Takeda and other from Abbvie and Daiichi Sankyo outside the current study. Shigeki Umemura reports honoraria for lectures from Chugai outside the current study. Yoshitaka Zenke reports grants from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo, GSK, Merck, MSD and Roche and honoraria for lectures from Amge, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Kyowa kirin, MSD, Nihon Kayaku, Novartis, Ono, Taiho and Takeda outside the current study. Kiyotaka Yoh reports grants from Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Taiho and Takeda and honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Janssen Pharmaceutical, Kyowa kirin, Novartis and Taiho and other from Boehringer Ingelheim outside the current study. Grace K. M. Low was a full-time employee of Janssen when this study was performed and received long-term incentives from Janssen. She is currently not an employee of Janssen. Jianmin Zhuo is employed by Janssen China. Koichi Goto reports grants from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Blueprint, Craif, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Haihe Biopharma, Ignyta, Janssen Pharmaceutical, KISSEI PHARMACEUTICAL, Kyowa Kirin, Life Technologies Japan, Loxo Oncology, LSI Medience Corporation, MEDICAL&BIOLOGICAL LABORATORIES, Merck, Merus, MSD, Novartis, Ono, Pfizer, Precision Medicine Asia, RIKEN GENESIS, Sumitomo Pharma, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Sysmex Corporation, Taiho, Takeda, Turning Point Therapeutics and Xcoo and honoraria for lectures from Amgen, Amoy Diagnosties Co, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Blueprint, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Guardant Health Inc, Haihe Biopharma, Janssen Pharmaceutical, Medpace Japan, Merck, Nippon Kayaku, Novartis, Ono, Otsuka, RIKEN GENESIS CO, Taiho and Takeda and other from Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly outside the current study., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

The CLIP1-LTK fusion was recently discovered as a novel oncogenic driver in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Lorlatinib, a third-generation ALK inhibitor, exhibited a dramatic clinical response in a NSCLC patient harboring CLIP1-LTK fusion. However, it is expected that acquired resistance will inevitably develop, particularly by LTK mutations, as observed in NSCLC induced by oncogenic tyrosine kinases treated with corresponding tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). In this study, we evaluate eight LTK mutations corresponding to ALK mutations that lead to on-target resistance to lorlatinib. All LTK mutations show resistance to lorlatinib with the L650F mutation being the highest. In vitro and in vivo analyses demonstrate that gilteritinib can overcome the L650F-mediated resistance to lorlatinib. In silico analysis suggests that introduction of the L650F mutation may attenuate lorlatinib-LTK binding. Our study provides preclinical evaluations of potential on-target resistance mutations to lorlatinib, and a novel strategy to overcome the resistance., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objectives: To validate or refute the hypothesis that non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC) with ground-glass areas (GGA+) within the tumour on high-resolution computed tomography are associated with a more favourable prognosis than those without GGA (GGA-)., Methods: We analysed data from a multicentre observational cohort study in Japan including 5005 patients with completely resected pathological stage I NSCLC, who were excluded from the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) 0707 trial on oral adjuvant treatment during the enrolment period. The patients' medical and pathological records were assessed retrospectively by physicians and re-staged according to the 8th tumour, node, metastasis edition., Results: Of the 5005 patients, 2388 (48%) were ineligible for the JCOG0707 trial and 2617 (52%) were eligible but were not enrolled. A total of 958 patients (19.1%) died. Patients with GGA+ NSCLC and pathological invasion ≤3 cm showed significantly better overall survival than others. In patients with tumours with an invasive portion ≤4 cm, GGA+ was associated with better survival. The prognoses of patients with GGA+ T2a and GGA- T1c tumours were similar (5-year overall survival: 84.6% vs 83.1%, respectively). The survival with T2b or more tumours appeared unaffected by GGA, and GGA was not prognostic in these larger tumours., Conclusions: Patients with GGA+ NSCLC on high-resolution computed tomography and ≤4 cm invasion size may have a better prognosis than patients with solid GGA- tumours of the same T-stage. However, the presence or absence of radiological GGA has little impact on the prognosis of patients with NSCLC with greater (>4 cm) pathological invasion., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study extracted clinicopathological features associated with recurrence and evaluated the tumor microenvironment in consecutive cases with resected pathological stage II-III epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant lung adenocarcinoma (EGFR-mt)., Methods: Between January 2008 and November 2018, we retrospectively reviewed 387 consecutive patients with pathological stage II-III lung adenocarcinoma who underwent surgical resection. We examined the EGFR mutation status (wild-type or mutant) and the evaluated clinicopathological features of all patients. In addition, tumor-promoting cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), tumor-associated M2 macrophages (TAMs), and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in the tumor microenvironment of EGFR-mt cells were evaluated by immunohistochemical analysis., Results: EGFR-mt (n = 124, 32 %) had more lymph node and pulmonary metastases than EGFR-wild-type lung adenocarcinoma (EGFR-wt) despite the smaller invasive component size. The disease-free survival (DFS) of patients with EGFR-mt tended to be shorter than that of patients with EGFR-wt. In the analysis according to the predominant subtype, EGFR-mt with papillary-predominant subtype had a significantly shorter 5-year DFS than that of EGFR-wt with papillary-predominant subtype (15.3 % vs. 44.1 %, p < 0.01). We observed no significant differences among the other subtypes. Multivariate analysis of DFS in patients with EGFR-mt revealed that male sex, pathological stage III, lymph node metastasis, pulmonary metastasis in the same lobe and non-acinar and non-lepidic predominant subtypes (papillary, solid, or micropapillary) were independent poor prognostic factors. Immunohistochemical analysis of EGFR-mt revealed that non-acinar- and non-lepidic-predominant subtypes were associated with a higher frequency of podoplanin-positive CAFs (36 % vs. 13 %, p = 0.01) and a higher median number of CD204-positive TAMs (61 vs. 49, p = 0.07) compared to the acinar- or lepidic-predominant subtypes., Conclusions: Non-acinar and non-lepidic predominant subtypes were predictors of recurrence and had an aggressive tumor microenvironment in pathological stage II-III EGFR-mt., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Evidence from the Phase III PACIFIC trial established durvalumab, a monoclonal antibody (mAb) targeting PD-L1, following concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) as a global standard of care for patients with unresectable, stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). There remains an unmet need to improve upon the outcomes achieved with the PACIFIC regimen. Combining durvalumab with other immunotherapies may improve outcomes further. Two such immunotherapies include oleclumab, an mAb targeting CD73, and monalizumab, an mAb targeting NKG2A. Both agents demonstrated antitumor activity in early-phase trials. PACIFIC-9 (NCT05221840) is an international, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, Phase III trial comparing durvalumab plus either oleclumab or monalizumab with durvalumab plus placebo in patients with unresectable, stage III NSCLC and no disease progression following cCRT. Clinical Trial Registration : NCT05221840 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Introduction: NRG1 gene fusions are clinically actionable alterations identified in NSCLC and other tumors. Previous studies have reported that NRG1 fusions signal through HER2 and HER3 but, thus far, strategies targeting HER3 specifically or HER2-HER3 signaling have exhibited modest activity in patients with NSCLC bearing NRG1 fusions. Although NRG1 fusion proteins can bind HER4 in addition to HER3, the contribution of HER4 and other HER family members in NRG1 fusion-positive cancers is not fully understood., Methods: We investigated the role of HER4 and EGFR-HER3 signaling in NRG1 fusion-positive cancers using Ba/F3 models engineered to express various HER family members in combination with NRG1 fusions and in vitro and in vivo models of NRG1 fusion-positive cancer., Results: We determined that NRG1 fusions can stimulate downstream signaling and tumor cell growth through HER4, independent of other HER family members. Moreover, EGFR-HER3 signaling is also activated in cells expressing NRG1 fusions, and inhibition of these receptors is also necessary to effectively inhibit tumor cell growth. We observed that cetuximab, an anti-EGFR antibody, in combination with anti-HER2 antibodies, trastuzumab and pertuzumab, yielded a synergistic effect. Furthermore, pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitors were more effective than tyrosine kinase inhibitors with greater specificity for EGFR, EGFR-HER2, or HER2-HER4, although the relative degree of dependence on EGFR or HER4 signaling varied between different NRG1 fusion-positive cancers., Conclusions: Our findings indicate that pan-HER inhibition including HER4 and EGFR blockade is more effective than selectively targeting HER3 or HER2-HER3 in NRG1 fusion-positive cancers., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Purpose: Patritumab deruxtecan, or HER3-DXd, is an antibody-drug conjugate consisting of a fully human monoclonal antibody to human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (HER3) attached to a topoisomerase I inhibitor payload via a stable tetrapeptide-based cleavable linker. We assessed the efficacy and safety of HER3-DXd in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR )-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: This phase II study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04619004) was designed to evaluate HER3-DXd in patients with advanced EGFR- mutated NSCLC previously treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy and platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC). Patients received HER3-DXd 5.6 mg/kg intravenously once every 3 weeks or an uptitration regimen (3.2 → 4.8 → 6.4 mg/kg). The primary end point was confirmed objective response rate (ORR; RECIST 1.1) by blinded independent central review (BICR), with a null hypothesis of 26.4% on the basis of historical data., Results: Enrollment into the uptitration arm closed early on the basis of a prespecified benefit-risk assessment of data from the phase I U31402-A-U102 trial. In total, 225 patients received HER3-DXd 5.6 mg/kg once every 3 weeks. As of May 18, 2023, median study duration was 18.9 (range, 14.9-27.5) months. Confirmed ORR by BICR was 29.8% (95% CI, 23.9 to 36.2); median duration of response, 6.4 months; median progression-free survival, 5.5 months; and median overall survival, 11.9 months. The subgroup of patients with previous osimertinib and PBC had similar outcomes. Efficacy was observed across a broad range of pretreatment tumor HER3 membrane expression levels and across diverse mechanisms of EGFR TKI resistance. In patients with nonirradiated brain metastases at baseline (n = 30), the confirmed CNS ORR by BICR per CNS RECIST was 33.3% (95% CI, 17.3 to 52.8). The safety profile (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0) was manageable and tolerable, consistent with previous observations., Conclusion: After tumor progression with EGFR TKI therapy and PBC in patients with EGFR -mutated NSCLC, HER3-DXd once every 3 weeks demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy with durable responses, including in CNS metastases. A phase III trial in EGFR- mutated NSCLC after progression on an EGFR TKI is ongoing (HERTHENA-Lung02; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05338970).

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported. The JIPANG study is an open-label phase III trial evaluating the efficacy of pemetrexed plus cisplatin (PemP) versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin (NP) as adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II-IIIA nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we report the long follow-up overall survival (OS) data. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive either PemP or NP. The primary end point was recurrence-free survival (RFS), and the secondary end point included OS. This analysis was performed using data collected 5 years after the last patient enrollment. Among 804 patients enrolled, 783 patients were eligible (384 for NP and 389 for PemP). The updated median RFS was 37.5 months in the NP arm and 43.4 months in the PemP arm with a hazard ratio of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.79 to 1.14). At a median follow-up of 77.3 months, the OS rates at 3 and 5 years were 84.1% and 75.6% versus 87.0% and 75.0% with a hazard ratio of 1.04 (95% CI, 0.81 to 1.34). This long-term follow-up analysis showed that PemP had similar efficacy to NP in both RFS and OS for this population, with one of the longest OS data compared with the historical data.

Introduction: BRAF non-V600E mutations occur in 1% to 2% of NSCLCs. Because of their rarity, the clinical backgrounds and outcomes of cytotoxic chemotherapy or immunotherapy remain unclear, and no targeted therapies are approved for BRAF non-V600E-mutant NSCLC., Methods: In this multi-institutional prospective lung cancer genomic screening project (LC-SCRUM-Asia), we evaluated the clinicogenomic characteristics and therapeutic outcomes of BRAF non-V600E-mutant NSCLC., Results: From March 2015 to November 2021, a total of 11,929 patients with NSCLC were enrolled. BRAF mutations were detected in 380 (3.5%), including the V600E (class I) in 119 (31%) and non-V600E in 261; the non-V600E were functionally classified into class II (122, 32%), class III (86, 23%), and non-classes I to III. Smokers and having concurrent RAS gene family or TP53 mutations were more frequently associated with class II or III than with class I. In patients with class III as compared with class I, the progression-free survival in response to platinum-containing chemotherapies (median, 5.3 versus 11.5 mo, p < 0.01) and the overall survival (median, 14.5 versus 34.8 mo, p < 0.02) were significantly shorter. Furthermore, class IIa mutations were significantly more frequent in our Asian cohort than in previously reported cohorts. The clinicogenomic features associated with class IIa were similar to those associated with class I, and one patient with NSCLC with K601E had a good response to dabrafenib plus trametinib., Conclusions: Patients with NSCLCs with BRAF non-V600E, especially class III, were associated with poorer therapeutic outcomes than those with V600E. Furthermore, patients with NSCLC with class IIa had distinct clinicogenomic features, and further preclinical and clinical studies are needed to evaluate class IIa mutations as a therapeutic target., (Copyright © 2023 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: This first-in-human, dose-escalation and dose-expansion study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and antitumor activity of datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd), a novel trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 (TROP2)-directed antibody-drug conjugate in solid tumors, including advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Patients and Methods: Adults with locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC received 0.27-10 mg/kg Dato-DXd once every 3 weeks during escalation or 4, 6, or 8 mg/kg Dato-DXd once every 3 weeks during expansion. Primary end points were safety and tolerability. Secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR), survival, and pharmacokinetics., Results: Two hundred ten patients received Dato-DXd, including 180 in the 4-8 mg/kg dose-expansion cohorts. This population had a median of three prior lines of therapy. The maximum tolerated dose was 8 mg/kg once every 3 weeks; the recommended dose for further development was 6 mg/kg once every 3 weeks. In patients receiving 6 mg/kg (n = 50), median duration on study, including follow-up, and median exposure were 13.3 and 3.5 months, respectively. The most frequent any-grade treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were nausea (64%), stomatitis (60%), and alopecia (42%). Grade ≥3 TEAEs and treatment-related AEs occurred in 54% and 26% of patients, respectively. Interstitial lung disease adjudicated as drug-related (two grade 2 and one grade 4) occurred in three of 50 patients (6%). The ORR was 26% (95% CI, 14.6 to 40.3), and median duration of response was 10.5 months; median progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.9 months (95% CI, 2.7 to 8.8 months) and 11.4 months (95% CI, 7.1 to 20.6 months), respectively. Responses occurred regardless of TROP2 expression., Conclusion: Promising antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile were seen with Dato-DXd in heavily pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC. Further investigation as first-line combination therapy in advanced NSCLC and as monotherapy in the second-line setting and beyond is ongoing.

The prognostic significance and role of extratumoral alveolar macrophages (exAMs) in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients remain unknown. In this study, we investigated the prognostic impact and gene expression of exAMs in LUAD patients. The density of alveolar macrophages (AMs) in the peri-tumoral lung field (p-exAMs) and distant lung field (d-exAMs) was evaluated in 217 LUAD patients with lymph node metastasis. Patients with high p-exAMs showed significantly shorter recurrence-free (RFS) and shorter overall survival (OS) than those with low p-exAMs (p = 0.02 and p = 0.03, respectively), whereas there was no survival difference between patients with high d-exAMs and those with low d-exAMs. Multivariate analysis revealed that high p-exAMs was an independent predictive factor for RFS (HR: 1.54; 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.10-2.16; p = 0.01). Later, we collected AMs from the tumor periphery and distant segments in 13 resected lungs by bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) procedure and compared mRNA expression. AMs in the tumor periphery expressed significantly higher levels of IL-10 and CCL2 than those in the distant segment (p < 0.01 and p = 0.03, respectively). Additionally, IL-10 and CCL2 significantly induced the growth and migration of the PC9 cells in vitro. This study suggests that p-exAMs should be considered as a tumor-promoting component in the tumor microenvironment., (© 2023 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

Introduction: This study aimed to clarify the correlation between the number of AMs and prognosis and to examine the gene expression of AMs in lung squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC)., Methods: We reviewed 124 stage I lung SqCC cases in our hospital and 139 stage I lung SqCC cases in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort in this study. We counted the number of AMs in the peritumoral lung field (P-AMs) and in the lung field distant from the tumor (D-AMs). Moreover, we performed a novel ex vivo bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) analysis to select AMs from surgically resected lung SqCC cases and examined the expression of IL10, CCL2, IL6, TGFβ, and TNFα (n = 3)., Results: Patients with high P-AMs had significantly shorter overall survival (OS) (p < 0.01); however, patients with high D-AMs did not have significantly shorter OS. Moreover, in TCGA cohort, patients with high P-AMs had a significantly shorter OS (p < 0.01). In multivariate analysis, a higher number of P-AMs were an independent poor prognostic factor (p = 0.02). Ex vivo BALF analysis revealed that AMs collected from the tumor vicinity showed higher expression of IL10 and CCL2 than AMs from distant lung fields in all 3 cases (IL-10: 2.2-, 3.0-, and 10.0-fold; CCL-2: 3.0-, 3.1-, and 3.2-fold). Moreover, the addition of recombinant CCL2 significantly increased the proliferation of RERF-LC-AI, a lung SqCC cell line., Conclusion: The current results indicated the prognostic impact of the number of peritumoral AMs and suggested the importance of the peritumoral tumor microenvironment in lung SqCC progression., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: KRAS G12C is an oncogenic driver mutation, accounting for approximately 14% of Caucasian patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recently, several KRAS G12C-targeted drugs have been developed; however, the clinico-genomic characteristics of NSCLC patients with KRAS G12C remain unclear., Materials and Methods: Based on the large-scale prospective lung cancer genomic screening project (LC-SCRUM-Asia) database, the clinico-genomic characteristics and therapeutic outcomes of NSCLC patients with KRAS G12C were evaluated., Results: From March 2015 to March 2021, 10,023 NSCLC patients were enrolled in LC-SCRUM-Asia. KRAS mutations were detected in 1258 patients (14 %), including G12C in 376 (4.0 %), G12D in 289 (3.1 %) and G12V in 251 (2.7 %). The proportions of males and smokers were higher in patients with KRAS G12C than in those with KRAS non-G12C mutations (males: 73 % vs 63 %, p < 0.001; smokers: 89 % vs 76 %, p < 0.001). KRAS G12C-positive tumors showed a higher tumor mutation burden (TMB) (mean, 8.1 mut/Mb, p < 0.001) and a higher percentage of tumors with programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression ≥50 % (52 %, p = 0.08). The overall survival in patients with KRAS G12C (median, 24.6 months) was not different between patients with other mutation subtypes (G12V: 18.2 months, p = 0.23; G12D: 20.6 months, p = 0.65; other KRAS mutations: 18.3 months, p = 0.20). Among KRAS-mutated patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the progression-free survival in G12C-positive patients (median, 3.4 months) was similar to that in G12V-positive patients (4.2 months, p = 0.90), but significantly longer than that in G12D- (2.0 months, p = 0.02) and other KRAS mutation-positive patients (2.5 months, p = 0.02)., Conclusions: The frequencies of KRAS G12C were lower in Asian than in Caucasian NSCLC patients. Among the KRAS-mutated NSCLC patients, G12C-positive tumors showed increased immunogenicity, such as high TMB and high PD-L1 expression, and potential sensitivity to ICIs., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors, including nivolumab, are essential agents for treating non-small cell lung cancer. However, predictive markers are currently lacking, especially using factors based on patient-reported outcomes., Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study of 244 patients with advanced or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer treated with second- or later-line nivolumab from August 2016 to December 2017. Patient-reported outcomes, including quality of life, were evaluated by the EQ-5D-5L before and during nivolumab treatment. To predict the efficacy of nivolumab during the early treatment phase, we also analyzed the patients' clinical characteristics, responses and immune-related adverse events at 9 weeks of therapy. The primary endpoint was the disease control rate at 25 weeks after the initiation of nivolumab., Results: The objective response and disease control rates at 25 weeks were 18.5 and 41.2%, respectively. The emergence of immune-related adverse events at 9 weeks did not significantly affect the disease control rate at 6 months. The response at 9 weeks and patient-reported quality of life were potentially predictive of disease control at week 25. Disease control on week 9 and patients-reported outcomes were potential predictive factors for the overall survival., Conclusions: This study found no new baseline factors predicting the outcome of nivolumab treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, but response to nivolumab was a robust predictor of overall efficacy. In addition, patient-perceived quality of life could predict the durable efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Introduction: Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) are observed in several cancers and are associated with favorable prognosis. This study aimed to examine the clinicopathological, genetic, and gene expression profiles of lung adenocarcinoma patients with TLS., Methods: A total of 112 patients with pathological stage IB lung adenocarcinoma who underwent complete resection between 2011 and 2015 were enrolled in this study. We investigated whether TLS correlated with prognosis and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Furthermore, the correlation of TLS with tumor mutation burden (TMB) and genetic mutations was evaluated in patients for whom whole-exon sequencing data were available. In addition, using the Cancer Genome Atlas Lung Adenocarcinoma (TCGA-LUAD) dataset, gene expression analysis according to the TLS status was performed., Results: Among the 112 patients, 49 were TLS-positive (TLS+). TLS+ correlated with longer recurrence-free survival (RFS) than TLS-negative cases (TLS-) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.47; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.23-0.88, p = 0.02). In the multivariate analysis, TLS was a better independent prognostic factor for RFS (HR 0.37, 95 %CI 0.18-0.72, p < 0.01). PD-L1 expression was not significantly different between TLS+ and TLS- patients (p = 0.54). TMB in TLS+ was similar to that in TLS- patients (p = 0.39); however, it tended to be lower than that in TLS- especially among smokers (p = 0.07). In gene expression analysis, RNA expression of chemokines related to lymph node formation, such as CXCL13, CCL19 and CCL21, was significantly higher, and biological processes such as positive regulation of humoral immune response and regulation of antigen receptor-mediated signaling pathway were enhanced in TLS+., Conclusions: TLS was a favorable prognostic factor and was not associated with PD-L1 expression in patients with lung adenocarcainoma. Moreover, gene expression analysis indicated that TLS is a site for the generation and regulation of antitumor immune responses., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: We conducted a post-marketing surveillance study to evaluate the clinical tolerability and safety of atezolizumab in Japanese patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: This prospective, observational post-marketing cohort study was conducted in NSCLC patients who received atezolizumab 1200 mg every 3 weeks at 770 facilities in Japan between April 18, 2018, and March 31, 2020 (study number UMIN000031978). Case report forms were completed, recording patient characteristics, treatment details, adverse events, adverse drug reactions (ADRs), their severity, onset and outcomes. Follow-up was for 12 months or until atezolizumab discontinuation., Results: Overall, 2570 patients were included, median age was 69.0 years, and 69.9% were males. ADRs were reported in 29.1% of patients, most commonly pyrexia (4.2%). Grade ≥ 3 ADRs occurred in 9.7% of patients aged <75 and 9.7% of those aged ≥75 years. The incidence of Grade ≥ 3 ADRs was not affected by the number of lines of previous treatment or the presence or history of an autoimmune disorder. Immune-related ADRs of interest that occurred in >1% of patients were interstitial lung disease (ILD; 4.4%), endocrine disorder (4.3%), and hepatic dysfunction (2.8%). ILD was significantly more common in patients with a history of, or concurrent, ILD versus those without (P ≤ 0.001). Risk factors of Grade ≥ 3 ADRs were a history of, or concurrent, ILD. Grade 5 ADRs occurred in 35 patients, 11 of whom had concurrent ILD., Conclusions: This large cohort study confirmed the clinical tolerability of atezolizumab in a real-world group of Japanese patients with NSCLC., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Background: Now that immunotherapy plus chemotherapy (CT) is one standard option in first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), there exists a medical need to assess the efficacy of second-line treatments (2LT) with antiangiogenics (AA). We performed an individual patient data meta-analysis to validate the efficacy of these combinations as 2LT., Methods: Randomised trials of AA plus standard 2LT compared to 2LT alone that ended accrual before 2015 were eligible. Fixed-effect models were used to compute pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS, main end-point), progression-free survival (PFS) and subgroup analyses., Results: Sixteen trials were available (8,629 patients, 64% adenocarcinoma). AA significantly prolonged OS (HR = 0.93 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.89; 0.98], p = 0.005) and PFS (0.80 [0.77; 0.84], p < 0.0001) compared with 2LT alone. Absolute 1-year OS and PFS benefit for AA were +1.8% [-0.4; +4.0] and +3.5% [+1.9; +5.1], respectively. The OS benefit of AA was higher in younger patients (HR = 0.87 [95% CI: 0.76; 1.00], 0.89 [0.81; 0.97], 0.94 [0.87; 1.02] and 1,04 [0.93; 1.17] for patients <50, 50-59, 60-69 and ≥ 70 years old, respectively; trend test: p = 0.02) and in patients who started AA within 9 months after starting the first-line therapy (0.88 [0.82; 0.99]) than in patients who started AA later (0.99 [0.91; 1.08]) (interaction: p = 0.03). Results were similar for PFS. AA increased the risk of hypertension (p < 0.0001), but not the risk of pulmonary thromboembolic events (p = 0.21)., Conclusions: In the 2LT of advanced NSCLC, adding AA significantly prolongs OS and PFS, but the benefit is clinically limited, mainly observed in younger patients and after shorter time since the start of first-line therapy., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement RH, MR, EBG, GVS, RR, NH, JV, KY, HG, JH and RH are authors for some of the trials included in this meta-analysis. Other authors have not reported any conflict of interest related to this study., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Osimertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is widely used as the first-line treatment for EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nevertheless, most cases ultimately acquire resistance to osimertinib, and no effective treatment has been currently established for cases having progressive disease (PD) with osimertinib. In clinical practice, EGFR-TKI therapy could be continued beyond response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST)-defined PD cases when they are clinically stable. Currently, the progression pattern of osimertinib and criteria for identifying patients who might benefit from osimertinib beyond PD are unknown. In addition, the efficacy and safety of osimertinib as the first-line treatment in real-world clinical practice remain unclear in Japan. This multicentre study was designed to evaluate the real-world data on first-line osimertinib and its post-treatment., Methods and Analysis: The study enrols patients with EGFR mutation-positive, advanced or recurrent NSCLC who received EGFR-TKI as the first-line therapy after 1 September 2018, from October 2019 to August 2020, and those started on osimertinib will be followed up until August 2022. We will evaluate the efficacy and safety of the first-line osimertinib treatment, adherence to it, progression patterns on RECIST PD and subsequent treatment., Ethics and Dissemination: All participating patients will provide written informed consent before entering the study. The protocol, amendments and patients' informed consent forms will be approved before study commencement by the institutional review board or independent ethics committee at each participation site (Lead Ethics Committee; Japan Red Cross Medical Center (26 April 2019, order number 976)). Patients will be anonymised before registration into the study and their anonymised data will be collected from the case report form. The results of this study will be presented at the national and international conferences and submitted for publication., Trial Registration Number: UMIN000038683., Competing Interests: Competing interests: KW, KY, YH, KaU, GN, KK and HK have received personal fees from AstraZeneca. KY and GN have received research grants from AstraZeneca., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

The mutation status of tumor tissue DNA (n = 389) of resected stage II-III non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (Ns-NSCLC) was analyzed using targeted deep sequencing as an exploratory biomarker study (JIPANG-TR) for the JIPANG study, a randomized phase III study of pemetrexed/cisplatin (Pem/Cis) vs vinorelbine/cisplatin (Vnr/Cis). The TP53 mutation, common EGFR mutations (exon 19 deletion and L858R), and KRAS mutations were frequently detected. The frequency of the EGFR mutation was significant among female patients. Patients with an EGFR mutation-positive status had a significantly shorter recurrence-free survival (RFS) time (24 mo vs not reached) (HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.22-2.21; P = .0011 for EGFR mutation status). Multivariable analysis identified both the pathological stage and EGFR mutation status as independent prognostic factors for RFS (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.30-2.44; P = .0003 for disease stage; and HR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.15-2.16; P = .0050 for EGFR mutation status). This study demonstrated that the EGFR mutation has either a poor prognostic or predictive impact on a poor response to postoperative chemotherapy with platinum doublet chemotherapy for stage II-III Ns-NSCLC patients. This result supports a role for mandatory molecular diagnosis of early-stage Ns-NSCLC for precision oncology and signifies the importance of adjuvant for the 3rd generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor rather than platinum-based chemotherapy. This study is registered with the UMIN Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN 000012237)., (© 2021 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

Lung cancer is one of the most aggressive tumour types. Targeted therapies stratified by oncogenic drivers have substantially improved therapeutic outcomes in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) 1 . However, such oncogenic drivers are not found in 25-40% of cases of lung adenocarcinoma, the most common histological subtype of NSCLC 2 . Here we identify a novel fusion transcript of CLIP1 and LTK using whole-transcriptome sequencing in a multi-institutional genome screening platform (LC-SCRUM-Asia, UMIN000036871). The CLIP1-LTK fusion was present in 0.4% of NSCLCs and was mutually exclusive with other known oncogenic drivers. We show that kinase activity of the CLIP1-LTK fusion protein is constitutively activated and has transformation potential. Treatment of Ba/F3 cells expressing CLIP1-LTK with lorlatinib, an ALK inhibitor, inhibited CLIP1-LTK kinase activity, suppressed proliferation and induced apoptosis. One patient with NSCLC harbouring the CLIP1-LTK fusion showed a good clinical response to lorlatinib treatment. To our knowledge, this is the first description of LTK alterations with oncogenic activity in cancers. These results identify the CLIP1-LTK fusion as a target in NSCLC that could be treated with lorlatinib., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Objectives: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have proven to be effective treatment for lung cancer. However, a precise predictive immuno-oncology biomarker is still under development. We investigated the associations among PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and oncogenic driver alterations in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with ICIs., Materials and Methods: This multicenter cohort study included 1017 lung cancer patients. PD-L1 expression using four IHC assays (22C3, 28-8, SP263, SP142), TMB by whole-exome sequencing and oncogenic driver alterations were analyzed comprehensively. Clinical characteristics, treatment and survival data were collected., Results: The results of 22C3 and 28-8 for PD-L1 expression showed acceptable concordance (k = 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-0.92), and the clinical outcomes of ICIs classified according to PD-L1 expression by both assays were also approximately the same. There was slight concordance (k = 0.16; 95% CI, 0.11-0.22) between 22C3 and SP142, and high PD-L1 expression by SP142 was correspond to very high PD-L1 expressions by other assays. Patients with both high PD-L1 expression and high TMB showed a good response to ICIs with the response rate of 64% and median progression-free survival of 9.0 months despite of small population. Common EGFR or STK11 mutations showed a lower rate of high PD-L1 expression and a worse efficacy of ICIs and KRAS mutations had no negative impact on response to ICIs., Conclusion: Comprehensive assessment of PD-L1 expression, TMB, and oncogenic driver alterations would help to better predict the clinical outcomes of ICIs in NSCLC patients., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This first-in-human phase I study (NCT03179436) investigated anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 monoclonal antibody quavonlimab and anti-programmed death 1 monoclonal antibody pembrolizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors. The study was conducted in two parts: dose-escalation (part 1) and dose-confirmation (part 2). First-line treatment with quavonlimab + pembrolizumab conferred encouraging antitumor activity (objective response rate [ORR], 28%-40%) and was generally well tolerated (grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events [TRAEs] were lowest with quavonlimab 25 mg every 6 weeks [Q6W] at 30% and highest with quavonlimab 75 mg Q3W at 57%) in non-small cell lung cancer. We present data from patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) receiving second-line or later therapy., Materials and Methods: Patients with stage III/IV SCLC received quavonlimab 75 mg Q6W plus pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W for ≤ 2 years. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability; ORRs as assessed by blinded independent central review per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumorsv1.1 was a secondary endpoint. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and the correlation of response with PD-L1 expression were exploratory endpoints., Results: Forty patients with extensive-stage SCLC received treatment; median follow-up was 13 months. Dose-limiting toxicity occurred in 4 patients (10%). TRAEs occurred in 80% of patients; grade 3 events occurred in 33% of patients and no grade 4/5 events were reported. Confirmed ORRs (95% CI) were 18% (7-33) among all patients, 7% (<1-34) for PD-L1-positive tumors (n = 14), and 19% (5-42) for PD-L1-negative tumors (n = 21). Response duration ranged from 2.9 to 19.1+ months. Median PFS was 2.0 months; 6-month PFS rate was 26%. Median OS was 11.0 months; 6-month OS rate was 66%., Conclusions: Encouraging antitumor activity was observed with quavonlimab + pembrolizumab in patients with extensive-stage SCLC; responses were observed in PD-L1-positive and PD-L1-negative tumors. The combination was tolerable with manageable toxicities., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: It has recently been suggested that concomitant medication may affect the clinical outcome of patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, only a few studies on the impact of concomitant medication on immune-related adverse events (irAEs) have previously been reported. Here, we aimed to determine the impact of concomitant medication on the efficacy and safety of ICIs., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 300 patients treated with nivolumab or pembrolizumab for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) between January 2016 and July 2018. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess the effect of concomitant medication on treatment response or irAEs. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate concomitant medication-related factors associated with time-to-treatment failure or overall survival (OS)., Results: A total of 70 patients responded to treatment and 137 experienced irAEs. The response rate and incidence of irAEs in patients treated with ICIs were not significantly associated with concomitant medication. Multivariate analysis showed that the use of opioids was an independent factor (time-to-treatment failure: hazard ratio 1.39, p = 0.021, OS: hazard ratio 1.54, p = 0.007)., Conclusions: The efficacy and safety of nivolumab or pembrolizumab in the treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC were not significantly influenced by concomitant medication. However, opioid usage might be associated with shorter OS in patients treated with these ICIs. Further mechanistic investigations should explore whether these associations are purely prognostic or contribute to ICI resistance., (© 2021 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Objectives: Tumor necrosis is a negative prognostic factor in various cancers. High-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas (HGNEC) of the lung, such as small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC), commonly have histopathological features of tumor necrosis. However, the prognostic value of tumor necrosis remains unknown., Materials and Methods: A total of 81 patients with HGNEC (SCLC, n = 42; LCNEC, n = 39) who underwent complete resection were enrolled. The proportion of necrosis in the tumor tissues was quantified using digital image analysis. We analyzed the relationship between the proportion of necrosis, clinicopathological factors, and prognosis. Moreover, we examined the correlation between genomic alterations and proportion of necrosis., Results: The median proportion of necrosis was 10.6 % (range, 0-62.8 %). The proportion of necrosis was not significantly different between SCLC (median, 5.1 %; range, 0-62.8 %) and LCNEC (median: 14.2 %; range, 0-59.3 %) (p =  0.14). The cumulative incidence of recurrence (CIR) and lung cancer-specific cumulative incidence of death (LC-CID) were significantly higher in patients with 10 % or higher necrosis (necrosis ≥ 10 %) than in those with less than 10 % (necrosis < 10 %) (hazard ratio [HR], 2.94; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.30-6.64, and HR, 2.87; 95 % CI, 1.13-7.29, respectively). In the bivariate analysis, necrosis ≥ 10 % was independently associated with higher CIR and tended to be associated with higher LC-CID. The frequency of genomic alterations in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, MYC family, MAPK/ERK pathway, and major RTK signaling pathways were not different between the necrosis ≥ 10 % and necrosis < 10 % groups for both SCLC and LCNEC., Conclusion: High proportion of tumor necrosis (≥ 10 %) had a negative prognostic value in surgically resected HGNEC., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Preliminary data suggest that combining savolitinib, a potent and highly selective MET-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), with osimertinib, a third-generation, irreversible, oral epidermal growth factor receptor-TKI (EGFR-TKI), may overcome MET-based resistance to EGFR-TKIs., Objective: To investigate the safety and tolerability of savolitinib in Japanese patients with advanced solid malignancies., Patients and Methods: In Part C of the phase Ib, multi-arm, open-label, multicenter TATTON study, two cohorts of Japanese adult patients were evaluated across six study centers in Japan. Patients with advanced solid malignancies received oral savolitinib monotherapy 400 mg once daily (qd), escalating to 600 mg; patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive (EGFRm) non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) who progressed on prior EGFR-TKI received oral osimertinib 80 mg+savolitinib 300/400/600 mg qd combination therapy. Primary endpoints: safety/tolerability of savolitinib±osimertinib, and maximum tolerated dose(s) (MTD) definition., Results: Seventeen patients received monotherapy; 12 received combination. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs): with monotherapy, 400 mg, none reported; 600 mg, n = 3/9 evaluable patients (33%) reported DLTs (grade 3 and 4 alanine aminotransferase and aspartate transaminase increased, and grade 4 drug-induced liver injury). With combination: 400 mg, 1/6 (17%) reported DLTs (grade 2 fatigue, nausea, and myalgia); 300 mg, none reported; 600 mg, 3/4 (75%) reported DLTs (grade 2 pyrexia, grade 3 skin reaction, and anaphylactic shock). Grade ≥3 adverse events were reported in 41% of patients receiving monotherapy and 33% receiving combination. TATTON is no longer recruiting patients., Conclusions: The MTD of savolitinib was 400 mg qd in both cohorts. Data demonstrate an acceptable safety profile for savolitinib alone, or with osimertinib., Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov; NCT02143466; 21 May 2014.

Objectives: The LURET phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the multikinase inhibitor vandetanib in patients with previously treatedRET-rearranged advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Among the eligible patients included in the primary analysis, the objective response rate met the primary endpoint (53 %, 90 % confidence interval [CI]: 31-74). Here, we report final survival outcomes of the LURET study., Materials and Methods: Nineteen patients with previously treated RET-rearranged advanced NSCLC continuously received 300 mg of oral vandetanib daily. This final analysis provides updated data on progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. This study was registered with UMIN-CTR (number UMIN 000010095)., Results: Among the 19 patients in the intention-to-treat population, 42 % had been heavily treated with 3 or more prior chemotherapy regimens. The median PFS was 6.5 months (95 % CI, 3.9-9.3) as determined by an independent radiology review committee. The median OS was 13.5 months (95 % CI, 9.8-28.1) and the overall survival rate at 12 months was 52.6 % (95 % CI 28.7-71.9). The most common adverse events were hypertension (84.2 %), diarrhea (78.9 %), and rash acneiform (63.2 %). Overall, 11 patients (57.9 %) had adverse events leading to a dose reduction, although the safety profile was consistent with that reported in previous studies., Conclusion: Our results indicated that vandetanib enabled a prolonged and clinically meaningful PFS and OS in patients with previously treatedRET-rearranged advanced NSCLC at the updated final analysis. The safety profile was consistent with that reported in previous studies, although most of the patients experienced off-target adverse events besides RET., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The usefulness of the histopathology of biopsy samples for predicting the efficacy of immunotherapy in non-squamous, non-small cell lung cancer (NSq NSCLC) patients remains unclear., Methods: We retrospectively investigated the associations between the histopathological features in biopsy samples and survival outcomes in advanced NSq NSCLC patients receiving pembrolizumab. NSq NSCLC was classified histopathologically as morphological adenocarcinoma or non-small cell carcinoma (NSCC: absence of definitive features of either adenocarcinoma or a squamous morphology). We investigated the association between the tumor morphological features and immune/genetic features by examining the tumor PD-L1 expression and tumor mutation burden (TMB)., Results: Among 33 advanced NSq NSCLC patients with tumor PD-L1 scores ≥ 50% receiving pembrolizumab as first-line therapy, a biopsy diagnosis of NSCC was associated with a significantly longer progression-free survival [median 16.8 vs. 2.3 months; hazard ratio (HR) 0.26; 95% CI 0.10-0.62, P = 0.01] and overall survival (median NR vs. 10.1 months; HR 0.35; 0.12-0.97, P = 0.04) as compared to that of morphological adenocarcinoma. In an analysis of 367 biopsy samples, the NSCC group showed a higher percentage of samples with PD-L1 scores ≥ 50% than the morphological adenocarcinoma group (35% vs. 10%). The NSCC group (n = 8) also showed a significantly higher TMB than the morphological adenocarcinoma group (n = 7) (median 236 vs. 25 mutations/whole exome, P = 0.01)., Conclusion: Absence of definitive morphological features in a biopsy sample could be a useful predictor of the efficacy of pembrolizumab in NSq NSCLC patients with tumor PD-L1 scores ≥ 50%, as these tumors are likely to show high tumor PD-L1 expression and high TMB.

Background: Quavonlimab (MK-1308), a novel anti-CTLA-4 antibody, in combination with pembrolizumab was investigated in a phase I study., Patients and Methods: Dose-escalation (DE) phase: patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors received an initial flat dose of quavonlimab as monotherapy [25 mg (cohort 1), 75 mg (cohort 2), or 200 mg (cohort 3)] followed by four treatments of the same quavonlimab dose plus pembrolizumab every 3 weeks (Q3W). Dose-confirmation phase (DC): patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) received first-line quavonlimab [25 mg Q3W (arm A), 25 mg Q6W (arm B), 75 mg Q6W (arm C), or 75 mg Q3W (arm E)] plus pembrolizumab. Primary objectives were safety and tolerability and establishment of the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of quavonlimab when used with pembrolizumab. Objective response rate (ORR) was a secondary endpoint. Efficacy based on PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and changes in circulating CD4+/CD8+ cells were exploratory endpoints., Results: Thirty-nine patients were enrolled in DE [n = 14 (cohort 1); n = 17 (cohort 2); n = 8 (cohort 3)] and 134 in DC [n = 40 (arm A); n = 40 (arm B); n = 40 (arm C); n = 14 (arm E)]. Maximum-tolerated dose was not reached. Grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events (AEs; graded according to NCI CTCAE v4.03) occurred in 0%, 23.5%, and 75.0% of patients in DE cohorts 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and 35.0%, 30.0%, 35.0%, and 57.1% of patients in DC arms A, B, C, and E, respectively. Efficacy was observed at all dose levels/schedules in patients with NSCLC. ORRs were 40.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 24.9-56.7; arm A], 37.5% (95% CI, 22.7-54.2; arm B), 27.5% (95% CI, 14.6-43.9; arm C), and 35.7% (95% CI, 12.8-64.9; arm E). PD-L1 expression and total number of circulating CD4+ cells correlated with ORR., Conclusions: Quavonlimab 25 mg Q6W plus pembrolizumab demonstrated similar efficacy and a better safety profile among all quavonlimab doses/schedules evaluated; this regimen was the chosen RP2D., Competing Interests: Disclosure RP reports a consultant role for Karyopharm Therapeutics and BioLineRx. JB reports an advisory board role for Roche, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Takeda, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Bayer; and a consultant role for MSD, BMS, Novartis, and AbbVie. DWR reports research grants from Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA. M-JA reports an advisory board role for AstraZeneca, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA, ONO, BMS, Takeda, Amgen, Novartis, and Roche; and a consultant role for Alpha Pharmaceutical Company, AstraZeneca, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA, ONO, BMS, Takeda, Amgen, Novartis, and Roche. KY reports honorarium received from promotional activities from Chugai Pharma, AstraZeneca, Lilly Japan, Novartis, Kirin, Bristol Myers Squibb Japan, and Taiho. D-WK reports travel and accommodation support for advisory board meeting attendance from Amgen and Daiichi Sankyo. AN reports an advisory board role for MSD, BMS, Roche, and AstraZeneca. MS reports honoraria received from promotional activities from AstraZeneca, MSD, Chugai, Taiho, Pfizer, Nippon Kayaku, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, ONO, Novartis, and Eli Lilly; and research grants from Chugai, AstraZeneca, MSD, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, ONO, Novartis, Eli Lilly, AbbVie, Ignyta, and Takeda. DHL reports honoraria for lecturing or consulting from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, ChongKunDang, CJ Healthcare, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Menarini, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA, Mundipharma, Novartis, Roche, ST Cube, and Takeda; and travel accommodations from Takeda and Blueprint Medicines. DRS reports leadership for Centennial Medical Center; consulting or advisory role for Genentech/Roche, Novartis, Celgene, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, AbbVie, Foundation Medicine, GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA, Moderna Therapeutics, Nektar, Takeda, Amgen, TRM Oncology, Precision Oncology, Evelo Therapeutics, Illumina, and PharmaMar; research funding (institution) from Genentech/Roche, Novartis, Celgene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center – Simmons Cancer Center, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA, AbbVie, GlaxoSmithKline, G1 Therapeutics, Neon Therapeutics, Takeda, Foundation Medicine, Nektar, Celldex, Clovis Oncology, Daiichi Sankyo, EMD Serono, Acerta Pharma, OncoGenex, Astellas Pharm, GRAIL, Transgene, Ipsen, ARMO BioSciences, Amgen, and Millennium; and travel, accommodation, and expenses from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Lilly, EMD Serono, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech, Genzyme, Intuitive Surgical, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA, Pfizer, Purdue Pharma, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, and Sysmex. SS is an employee of Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA. XL is an employee of Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA. JC is an employee of Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA and has stock ownership interests in Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA. AC is an employee of Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA and has stock ownership interests in Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA. AC is an employee of Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA. RAA is an employee of Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA. BCC reports a speakers bureau role for Novartis; an advisory board role for Novartis, Bayer, AstraZeneca, MOGAM Institute, Dong-A ST, Champions Oncology, Janssen, Yuhan, ONO, Dizal Pharma, and MSD; a consultant role for Novartis, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, BMS, ONO, Yuhan, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Takeda, and MSD; stock ownership interests in TheraCanVac Inc., Gencurix Inc., and BridgeBio Therapeutics; honoraria from promotional activities for Novartis, Bayer, AstraZeneca, MOGAM Institute, Dong-A ST, Champions Oncology, Janssen, Yuhan, ONO, Dizal Pharma, and MSD; research grants from Novartis, Bayer, AstraZeneca, MOGAM Institute, Dong-A ST, Champions Oncology, Janssen, Yuhan, Ono, Dizal Pharma, MSD; and royalties, intellectual property or patents with Champions Oncology. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Agents targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) have been approved as monotherapy for patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). In preclinical models, the combined targeting of PD-1 and delta-like protein 3 resulted in enhanced antitumor activity. Herein, we report results from the expansion arm of study NCT03000257 evaluating the combination of the anti-PD-1 antibody budigalimab and the targeted antibody-drug conjugate rovalpituzumab tesirine (Rova-T) in patients with previously treated SCLC., Materials and Methods: This expansion arm of a multicenter, open-label, multi-arm, first-in-human phase 1 clinical trial enrolled adult patients with progressive SCLC. The primary objective was to assess safety and tolerability. Patients received budigalimab 375 mg via intravenous infusion every 3 weeks, and Rova-T was administered as a dose of 0.3 mg/kg intravenously, on day 1 of the first and third 3-week cycle., Results: As of October 2019, 31 patients with SCLC were enrolled and treated with budigalimab plus Rova-T. The combination was tolerated, with the most common treatment-emergent adverse events (in >30%) being pleural effusion, fatigue, and cough. The overall response rate was 24.1%, with one confirmed complete response and six confirmed partial responses. The overall response rate in patients with high delta-like protein 3 expression was similar (21.1%). The median progression-free survival was 3.48 months., Conclusion: Combination therapy with budigalimab and Rova-T had promising efficacy and appeared to be tolerated in patients with SCLC. Although Rova-T development has been discontinued, development of budigalimab combined with other anticancer agents is ongoing., Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT03000257 Statement on originality of the work The manuscript represents original work and has not been submitted for publication elsewhere nor previously published. Statement of prior presentation Data from this study were previously presented at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Congress 2019., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

In the global phase III RELAY study, ramucirumab plus erlotinib (RAM + ERL) demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) to placebo plus erlotinib (PL + ERL) in untreated patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (hazard ratio (HR) [95% CI]: 0.59 [0.46-0.76]). This prespecified analysis assessed RAM + ERL efficacy and safety in the RELAY subset enrolled in East Asia (Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, Hong Kong). Randomized (1:1) patients received oral ERL (150 mg/d) plus intravenous RAM (10 mg/kg) or PL Q2W. Primary endpoint was PFS (investigator-assessed). Key secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), overall survival (OS), and safety. Exploratory endpoints included biomarker analyses and time to second progression (PFS2). Median PFS was 19.4 vs 12.5 mo for RAM + ERL (n = 166) vs PL + ERL (n = 170) (HR: 0.636 [0.485-0.833]; P = .0009). The 1-y PFS rate was 72.4% vs 52.2%, respectively. PFS benefit was consistent in most subgroups, including by EGFR mutation (Ex19del, Ex21.L858R). ORR and DCR were similar in both arms, but median DoR was longer with RAM + ERL. OS and PFS2 were immature at data cut-off (censoring rates, 81.2%-84.3% and 64.1%-70.5%, respectively). Grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events were more frequent with RAM + ERL (70.7%) than PL + ERL (49.4%). Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation were similar in both arms (RAM + ERL, 13.3%; PL + ERL, 12.9%), as were post-progression EGFR T790M mutation rates (43%; 50%). With superior PFS over PL + ERL and safety consistent with the overall RELAY population, RAM + ERL is a viable treatment option for EGFR-mutated metastatic NSCLC in East Asia., (© 2020 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

Introduction TAS-114 is a potent inhibitor of deoxyuridine triphosphatase, which is a gatekeeper protein preventing uracil and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) misincorporation into DNA. TAS-114 has been suggested to enhance the antitumor activity of 5-FU. This randomized, phase 2 study investigated TAS-114 plus S-1 (TAS-114/S-1) vs. S-1 in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Methods Patients with advanced NSCLC, previously treated with ≥ 2 regimens, were randomized 1:1 to receive TAS-114 (400 mg)/S-1 (30 mg/m 2 ) or S-1 (30 mg/m 2 ). Progression-free survival (PFS, independent central review) was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and safety. Results In total, 127 patients received treatment. Median PFS was 3.65 and 4.17 months in the TAS-114/S-1 and S-1 groups, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71-1.88; P = 0.2744). DCR was similar between groups (TAS-114/S-1 80.3%, S-1 75.9%) and median OS was 7.92 and 9.82 months for the TAS-114/S-1 and S-1 groups, respectively (HR 1.31, 95% CI 0.80-2.14; P = 0.1431). The ORR was higher in the TAS-114/S-1 group than the S-1 group (19.7% vs. 10.3%), and more patients with tumor shrinkage were observed in the TAS-114/S-1 group. Incidence rates of anemia, skin toxicities, and Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events were higher in the TAS-114/S-1 group compared with the monotherapy group. Conclusions Although the TAS-114/S-1 combination improved the response rate, this did not translate into improvements in PFS. Clinical Trial Registration No. NCT02855125 (ClinicalTrials.gov) registered on 4 August 2016.

Objective: In the phase 3 RELAY trial, ramucirumab/erlotinib demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) over placebo/erlotinib in patients with EGFR -mutated metastatic NSCLC (median PFS 19.4 versus 12.4 months; HR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.46-0.76; p  < .0001). Safety was consistent with established profiles for ramucirumab and erlotinib in NSCLC. Here, we present patient-reported outcomes., Methods: Patients received oral erlotinib (150 mg daily) plus intravenous ramucirumab (10 mg/kg) or placebo Q2W until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. Patients completed the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) and EQ-5D questionnaires at baseline and every other cycle. Analyses included time to deterioration (TtD) for LCSS via Kaplan-Meier method and Cox models and changes from baseline using mixed-model repeated-measures regression analysis., Results: Overall patient compliance for LCSS and EQ-5D was >95%. TtD did not differ between treatment arms for LCSS Total Score (HR = 0.962, 95% CI = 0.690-1.343) and Average Symptom Burden Index (HR = 1.012, 95% CI = 0.732-1.400). TtD of individual LCSS items (appetite loss, fatigue, cough, shortness of breath, pain, symptom distress, difficulties with daily activities, quality of life) indicated no difference between arms; however, patient-reported blood in sputum was worse for ramucirumab/erlotinib (HR = 1.987, 95% CI = 1.206-3.275). Results of LCSS mean changes from baseline were consistent with TtD, indicating no significant differences between treatment arms except for blood in sputum. Mean changes from baseline in EQ-5D index score ( p  = .94) and visual analogue scale ( p  = .95) revealed no overall differences in health status between treatment arms., Conclusions: Patients' overall quality of life and symptom burden did not differ with the addition of ramucirumab to erlotinib compared to placebo/erlotinib. These data support the clinical benefit of ramucirumab/erlotinib in untreated EGFR -mutated metastatic NSCLC.

We analyzed 135 patients (including 27 EGFR-mutant and 29 EGFR-wild) with T1-3N0M0 non-squamous NSCLC treated by PBT. Considering the 3-year cumulative incidence, the EGFR-mutant group showed a significantly lower infield failure rate (9% vs 27%, p = 0.02) and higher out-of-field failure rate (67% vs 40%, p = 0.02) than the EGFR-wild group., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Cryoprobe is a novel transbronchial biopsy (TBB) tool that yields larger tissue samples than forceps. Pathological diagnosis and biomarker analysis, such as genetic alterations and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, are paramount for precision medicine against lung cancer. We evaluated the safety and usefulness of cryoprobe TBB for lung cancer diagnosis and biomarker analysis. In this single-center, prospective single-arm study, patients suspected of having or diagnosed with primary lung cancer underwent cryoprobe TBB using flexible bronchoscopy after conventional forceps TBB from the same lesion. Cryoprobe TBB was performed in 121 patients. The incidence rate of severe bleeding and serious adverse events (4% [90% confidence interval: 2%-9%]) was significantly lower than the expected rate (20% with 30% threshold, P < 0.01). Combining both central and peripheral lesions, the diagnostic yield rate of cryoprobe samples was 76% and that of forceps samples was 84%. Compared with forceps TBB samples, cryoprobe TBB samples were larger (cryoprobe 15 mm 2 vs forceps 2 mm 2 ) and resulted in a larger proportion of definite histomorphological diagnosis (cryoprobe 86% vs forceps 74%, P < 0.01), larger amounts of DNA extracted from samples (median: cryoprobe, 1.60 µg vs forceps, 0.58 µg, P = 0.02) and RNA (median: cryoprobe, 0.62 µg vs forceps, 0.17 µg, P < 0.01) extracted from samples, and tended to yield greater rates of PD-L1 expression >1% (51% vs 42%). In conclusion, cryoprobe is a safe and useful tool for obtaining lung cancer tissue samples of adequate size and quality, which allow morphological diagnosis and biomarker analysis for precision medicine against lung cancer., (© 2020 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

Background: MET-deregulated non-small cell lung cancer represents an urgent clinical need because of the lack of specific therapies. Although recent studies have suggested a potential role for crizotinib in patients harboring MET gene alterations, no conclusive data are currently available. Therefore, we designed the Co-MET study, a single-arm phase II study to assess the efficacy and safety of crizotinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancers harboring MET gene alterations., Methods: Co-MET is an open-label, multi-center, single-arm, phase II trial to assess the safety and efficacy of oral crizotinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer harboring MET exon 14 skipping mutation (cohort 1) or a high MET gene copy number of ≥ 7 (cohort 2). We will identify MET gene alterations using RT-PCR and/or next-generation sequencing. Oral crizotinib 250 mg BID will be administered until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. A radiology committee will review tumor scans according to the RECIST criteria. The primary endpoint is the objective response rate. Assuming a null hypothesis of 20% objective response rate and an alternative hypothesis of 50% objective response rate for cohort 1, and a one-sided alpha error of 0.05 and 80% power based on the exact binomial distribution, the required number of evaluable patients is 19. We set the exploratory sample size for cohort 2 at 10 patients., Discussion: The results of this study are expected to provide evidence regarding the usefulness of oral crizotinib for advanced MET exon 14 skipping mutation-positive or MET high gene copy number-positive non-small cell lung cancer., Trial Registration: This study was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000031623 on 3 March 2018.

Objectives: Loss of the chromatin remodeling SWItch/Sucrose Non-fermentable (SWI/SNF) complex is implicated in the pathogenesis of several types of neoplasms. The aim of this study was to examine the clinicopathological features of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with loss of expression of the SWI/SNF complex., Materials and Methods: Specimens from a total 1013 NSCLC cases used for tissue microarrays (TMAs) were immunohistochemically examined for expression of SWI/SNF complex (BAF) subunits, namely SMARCA4, SMARCA2, ARID1A, and ARID1B. We examined the clinicopathological features and PD-L1 expression status in NSCLC cases with loss of expression of one or more subunits of the SWI/SNF complex (BAF-Loss). Moreover, we compared the tumor mutation burden (TMB) between NSCLC cases with BAF-Loss and those with intact expression of the four subunits (BAF-Intact)., Results: Using TMA, BAF-Loss was observed in 5.4% of cases (SMARCA4: 2.4%, SMARCA2: 2.4%, ARID1A: 1.3%, and ARID1B: 0.3%). Concurrent loss of expression of two or more subunits of the SWI/SNF complex was detected in 0.7% of cases. BAF-Loss was significantly associated with smoking history, young age, male sex, pulmonary emphysema/bullae, large invasive tumor size, pleural invasion, vascular invasion, solid-predominant morphology, and absence of a lepidic growth component. A higher proportion of PD-L1-positive cases was observed among NSCLC patients with BAF-Loss than BAF-Intact (42% vs 26%, P < 0.01). In stage I NSCLC, SWI/SNF-Loss (n = 23) was associated with shorter overall survival (HR: 2.43; 95% CI: 1.18-5.01; P = 0.01) and recurrence-free survival (HR: 2.22; 95% CI: 1.17-4.24; P < 0.01) compared to BAF-Intact (n = 563). The degree of TMB was significantly higher among NSCLC patients with BAF-Loss (n = 3) than BAF-Intact (n = 7) (median 437 vs 113 mutations/whole-exome, P = 0.02)., Conclusion: The current results suggest that loss of SWI/SNF expression in NSCLC is associated with aggressive clinicopathological features, PD-L1-positive status and high TMB., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The prognosis of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) is poor, and 5%-20% of those receiving chemotherapy experience ILD exacerbation. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin for NSCLC patients with ILD, we undertook a multicenter phase II study. Chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC and mild or moderate ILD received nab-paclitaxel (100 mg/m 2 , days 1, 8, and 15) plus carboplatin (area under the curve = 6, day 1) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles (maximum, 6 cycles). Interstitial lung diseases were diagnosed based on criteria for fibrosing interstitial pneumonia. The primary endpoint was the prevalence of exacerbation-free ILD 28 days after completion of protocol treatment. Secondary endpoints were response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, prevalence of exacerbation-free ILD, and toxicity. Ninety-four patients were enrolled, and 92 patients received any protocol treatment. Median age was 70 years, and 58% had nonsquamous histology. In the primary analysis, the prevalence of exacerbation-free ILD 28 days after protocol treatment was 95.7% (88/92; 90% confidence interval, 90.3-98.5), which met the primary endpoint. Response rate was 51% (95% confidence interval, 40%-62%). At the time of data cut-off, median progression-free survival was 6.2 months, and median overall survival was 15.4 months. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (75%), leukopenia (53%), anemia (48%), and thrombocytopenia (20%). Two treatment-related deaths (1 each of pulmonary infection and ILD exacerbation) were observed. This study showed that a combination of nab-paclitaxel with carboplatin was tolerable in NSCLC patients with mild or moderate ILD in terms of safety. This study is registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN 000012989)., (© 2019 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

Background: Dual blockade of the EGFR and VEGF pathways in EGFR-mutated metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is supported by preclinical and clinical data, yet the approach is not widely implemented. RELAY assessed erlotinib, an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) standard of care, plus ramucirumab, a human IgG1 VEGFR2 antagonist, or placebo in patients with untreated EGFR-mutated metastatic NSCLC., Methods: This is a worldwide, double-blind, phase 3 trial done in 100 hospitals, clinics, and medical centres in 13 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older (20 years or older in Japan and Taiwan) at the time of study entry, had stage IV NSCLC, with an EGFR exon 19 deletion (ex19del) or exon 21 substitution (Leu858Arg) mutation, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and no CNS metastases. We randomly assigned eligible patients in a 1:1 ratio to receive oral erlotinib (150 mg/day) plus either intravenous ramucirumab (10 mg/kg) or matching placebo once every 2 weeks. Randomisation was done by an interactive web response system with a computer-generated sequence and stratified by sex, geographical region, EGFR mutation type, and EGFR testing method. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02411448, and is ongoing for long-term survival follow-up., Findings: Between Jan 28, 2016, and Feb 1, 2018, 449 eligible patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to treatment with ramucirumab plus erlotinib (n=224) or placebo plus erlotinib (n=225). Median duration of follow-up was 20·7 months (IQR 15·8-27·2). At the time of primary analysis, progression-free survival was significantly longer in the ramucirumab plus erlotinib group (19·4 months [95% CI 15·4-21·6]) than in the placebo plus erlotinib group (12·4 months [11·0-13·5]), with a stratified hazard ratio of 0·59 (95% CI 0·46-0·76; p<0·0001). Grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 159 (72%) of 221 patients in the ramucirumab plus erlotinib group versus 121 (54%) of 225 in the placebo plus erlotinib group. The most common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events in the ramucirumab plus erlotinib group were hypertension (52 [24%]; grade 3 only) and dermatitis acneiform (33 [15%]), and in the placebo plus erlotinib group were dermatitis acneiform (20 [9%]) and increased alanine aminotransferase (17 [8%]). Treatment-emergent serious adverse events were reported in 65 (29%) of 221 patients in the ramucirumab plus erlotinib group and 47 (21%) of 225 in the placebo plus erlotinib group. The most common serious adverse events of any grade in the ramucirumab plus erlotinib group were pneumonia (seven [3%]) and cellulitis and pneumothorax (four [2%], each); the most common in the placebo plus erlotinib group were pyrexia (four [2%]) and pneumothorax (three [1%]). One on-study treatment-related death due to an adverse event occurred (haemothorax after a thoracic drainage procedure for a pleural empyema) in the ramucirumab plus erlotinib group., Interpretation: Ramucirumab plus erlotinib demonstrated superior progression-free survival compared with placebo plus erlotinib in patients with untreated EGFR-mutated metastatic NSCLC. Safety was consistent with the safety profiles of the individual compounds in advanced lung cancer. The RELAY regimen is a viable new treatment option for the initial treatment of EGFR-mutated metastatic NSCLC., Funding: Eli Lilly., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is a predictive biomarker for patient response to nivolumab in nonsquamous NSCLC. However, the number of biopsy samples and tumor cells (TCs) required to assess PD-L1 expression remains unclear., Methods: A total of 222 biopsy samples from 80 patients with nonsquamous NSCLC treated with nivolumab were collected. Number of TCs and PD-L1 score were compared among the sample containing the largest number of TCs (Max-TC), the sample containing the smallest number of TCs (Min-TC), and the total samples from each patient. The impact of the number of samples and TCs on the prediction of patient response to nivolumab with use of PD-L1 scores was evaluated., Results: There was a mismatch in PD-L1 scores less than 1% and those of at least 1% between Max-TC and the total samples in one patient (1%) and between Max-TC and Min-TC in six patients (8%). The optimal number of TCs to match PD-L1 expression less than 1% versus at least 1% between Max-TC and Min-TC was 100 (sensitivity = 0.676 and 1 - specificity = 0.333). PD-L1 expression of at least 1% in Min-TCs containing at least 100 TCs was associated with longer progression-free survival (median 7.6 versus 1.8 months [p < 0.01]) and overall survival (median not reached versus 9.9 months [p = 0.04]) compared with PD-L1 expression less than 1%. However, there were no differences in progression-free survival (median 3.9 versus 2.3 months [p = 0.37]) or overall survival (median 9.7 versus 7.6 months [p = 0.60]) between PD-L1 expression of at least 1% and PD-L1expression less than 1% in Min-TCs containing fewer than 100 TCs., Conclusion: Single biopsy samples containing at least 100 TCs are required to evaluate PD-L1 expression for predicting patient response to nivolumab., (Copyright © 2019 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Histology samples are important for the appropriate administration of tumor type-specific cytotoxic and molecular-targeted therapies for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). When biopsy samples lack a definite morphology, a diagnosis can be selected from three subtypes based on immunohistochemistry (IHC) results, as follows: favor adenocarcinoma (ADC), favor squamous cell carcinoma (SQC), or not otherwise specified (NOS)-null. In terms of patient outcome, however, the validity of IHC-based classifications remains unknown., Methods: A large series of 152 patients with advanced NSCLC whose diagnoses had been made based on morphological findings and who had been homogeneously treated were enrolled. We used IHC staining (TTF-1, SP-A, p40, and CK5/6) to examine tumor samples and refined the diagnoses. We then analyzed the pathological subgroups according to the IHC staining results., Results: IHC profiling resulted in 50% of the cases being classified as favor ADC, 31% being classified as favor SQC, and 19% being classified as NOS-null groups. Compared with the favor ADC and favor SQC groups, the NOS-null group had a significantly poorer outcome. Pemetrexed-containing platinum regimens produced a response rate similar to that of other platinum doublet regimens in the favor ADC group (44% vs. 46%), whereas it produced a poorer response in the favor SQC group (0% vs. 52%) and the NOS-null group (0% vs. 24%). The favor ADC group tended to have a higher percentage of EGFR positivity and ALK positivity than the favor SQC group (25% vs. 11% and 7% vs. 0%, respectively)., Conclusions: These findings support the use of immunohistological subtyping of NSCLC biopsy specimens to select patient-appropriate treatments.

Next generation sequencing (NGS)-based tumor profiling identified an overwhelming number of uncharacterized somatic mutations, also known as variants of unknown significance (VUS). The therapeutic significance of EGFR mutations outside mutational hotspots, consisting of >50 types, in nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) is largely unknown. In fact, our pan-nation screening of NSCLC without hotspot EGFR mutations ( n = 3,779) revealed that the majority (>90%) of cases with rare EGFR mutations, accounting for 5.5% of the cohort subjects, did not receive EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as a first-line treatment. To tackle this problem, we applied a molecular dynamics simulation-based model to predict the sensitivity of rare EGFR mutants to EGFR-TKIs. The model successfully predicted the diverse in vitro and in vivo sensitivities of exon 20 insertion mutants, including a singleton, to osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR-TKI ( R 2 = 0.72, P = 0.0037). Additionally, our model showed a higher consistency with experimentally obtained sensitivity data than other prediction approaches, indicating its robustness in analyzing complex cancer mutations. Thus, the in silico prediction model will be a powerful tool in precision medicine for NSCLC patients carrying rare EGFR mutations in the clinical setting. Here, we propose an insight to overcome mutation diversity in lung cancer., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.)