Search

Background: The standard method to diagnose Loa loa infection and quantify microfilarial density (MFD) is the microscopic examination of calibrated thick blood smears (TBSs). In 1950, it was noticed that successive L. loa MFD samples from a single capillary puncture could exhibit up to 20% variation. Although loiasis treatment allocation is based on MFD to prevent serious adverse events (SAEs), data on this variability are scarce. There are also no guidelines supporting the collection and analysis of one or two TBSs., Methods: We assessed the variability of two successive L. loa MFD samples (MFD 1 and MFD 2 ), collected from 255 patients. We analyzed the influence of sex, age, weight, heart rate, arterial pressure, body temperature, and sampling time on MFD variability, as well the impact of MFD variability on MFD thresholds relevant to loiasis treatment protocols., Results: The MFD 2 was found to have increased in 63% (1145/1826) of TBS pairs and to have decreased in 37% (681/1826) of TBS pairs. The MFD 2 were on average 28% higher than the MFD 1 . These variations drove a total of 333 (17.4%) changes in MFD classes according to loiasis treatment protocol, including 210 (11.3%) class increases. TBSs generated from blood samples from subjects with lower MFD (1-1000 mf/ml) or lower mean arterial pressure (MAP; 55-80 mmHg), or from blood samples collected at an earlier hour time-point (10:00-10:59 a.m.) were more subject to MFD 2 variability in a multivariate analysis. The MFD relative change was not constant over time for a given person., Conclusions: We observed a trend towards an increase in MFD 2 with an important variability between samples that may impact loiasis treatment allocation. We suggest that systematically sampling at least two successive TBSs might allow better MFD assessments to prevent post-treatment SAEs. Further studies are needed to verify this variability in larger samples as well as confirm the potential explanatory variables identified., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Endemic to Central Africa, loiasis, caused by the vector-borne worm Loa loa, affects approximately 10 million individuals. Clinical manifestations include transient angioedema (Calabar swellings), migration of the adult worm under the eye conjunctiva (eye worm) and less specific general symptoms. Loiasis presents a significant public health challenge because L. loa-infected individuals can develop serious adverse events after taking ivermectin, the drug used to combat onchocerciasis. In this context, alternative interventions and rigorous diagnostic approaches are needed. Diagnosing loiasis is challenging because its main clinical manifestations are sporadic and non-specific. The definitive diagnosis relies on identifying adult worms migrating beneath the conjunctiva, or microfilariae (pre-larvae) in blood smears. However, "occult loiasis" (infection without blood microfilariae) is frequent. Serological rapid antibody diagnostic tests (ARTs) can provide an alternative diagnostic method. We compared a novel ART simultaneously targeting onchocerciasis (IgG4 to Ov-16 and OvOC3261, test line 1) and loiasis (IgG4 to L1-SXP-1, test line 2), called IgG4-SXP-1 biplex test) to the already established Loa-ART (all IgG isotypes to Ll-SXP-1, called pan-IgG-SXP-1 test)., Methodology: Blood samples underwent both ARTs, read qualitatively and semi-quantitatively. Additionally, blood smears, skin snips, Kato-Katz method for soil-transmitted helminthiases identification and eosinophilia measurements were performed. Questionnaires gathered demographic details and loiasis-related signs. ARTs performance was compared using specific loiasis-related signs and microfilaremia as references. Discordances between the two ARTs were investigated using logistic regression models., Principal Findings: Out of 971 participants, 35.4% had L. loa microfilaremia, 71.9% had already experienced loiasis-related signs, 85.1% were positive in the pan-IgG-SXP-1 test and 79.4% were positive in the IgG4-SXP-1 biplex test. In the microfilariae-positive population, the sensitivity of the rapid tests was 87.4% for the pan-IgG-SXP-1 test and 88.6% for the prototype IgG4-SXP-1 biplex test. Sensitivity was similar for both ARTs when using eye worm or Calabar swelling as references, but diagnostic performance varied based on microfilaremia levels and occult loiasis. Overall, IgG4-SXP-1 biplex test demonstrated a sensitivity of 84.1% and specificity of 47.6% for loiasis compared to the pan-IgG-SXP-1 test, leading to a Kappa coefficient estimated at 0.27 ± 0.03 for the qualitative results of the 2 ARTs. In the group that tested positive with the Pan-IgG test but negative with the IgG4-specific test, there was a lower prevalence of STH infection (p = 0.008) and elevated eosinophilia (p<0.001) compared to the general tested population., Conclusion/significance: The sensitivity of each test was good (84-85%) but the diagnostic agreement between the two ARTs was poor, suggesting that IgG and IgG4 antibody responses should be interpreted differently. The assessment of the innovative rapid diagnostic IgG4-SXP-1 biplex test, designed for onchocerciasis and loiasis, shows encouraging sensitivity but underlines the necessity for further in vitro assessment., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Campillo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Background-Rationale: The diagnosis of Loa loa microfilaremia consists in the observation, using a microscope, of microfilariae in a sample of peripheral blood spread on a slide and subsequently stained (the "blood smear technique"). The accurate quantification of Loa loa microfilaremia is important because the choice of the first intention treatment depends on the patient's microfilaremia: severe adverse events can occur in individuals with high microfilarial densities when treated with ivermectin or diethylcarbamazine, the latter drug being the only one which can definitively cure the infection. However, despite the widespread usage of this technique and its role in guiding clinical management of the patient, estimates of its reliability remain scarce., Materials and Methods: We evaluated the reliability (reproducibility and repeatability) of blood smear technique using several sets of 10 L. loo -positive slides, randomly selected, and considered the results with regard to regulatory requirements. The slides had been prepared as part of a clinical trial conducted in Sibiti, Republic of Congo, a region where loiasis is endemic., Results: The estimated and acceptable coefficients of repeatability (NB: the lower, the better) were 13.6% and 16.0%, respectively. The estimated and acceptable coefficients of intermediate reliability (reproducibility) were 15.1% and 22.5%, respectively. The poorest coefficient of intermediate reliability was 19.5% when the tested parameter was related to the technician who performed the readings (10.7% when the reading day was changed). The inter-technician coefficient of variation assessed using 1876 L. loo -positive slides was 13.2%. The coefficient of inter-technician variation considered acceptable was estimated at 18.6%. Discussion-Conclusion. All estimated coefficients of variability were lower than the calculated acceptable coefficients suggesting reliability of the technique, although the lack of laboratory references precludes any conclusion on the quality of this diagnosis. It is imperative to implement a quality system and standardization of procedures for the diagnosis of L. loo microfilaremia, both in endemic countries and in the rest of the world, where the demand for diagnosis has been increasing for years., (Copyright © 2023 SFMTSI.)

Background: Loa loa microfilariae circulate in the peripheral blood of human hosts following a diurnal periodicity, with maximal microfilaremia levels generally observed between 10:00 am and 3:00 pm. Few studies have assessed factors potentially associated with this periodicity., Methods: Microfilaremia data were collected repeatedly between 9:00 am and 8:00 pm from 13 individuals in the Republic of the Congo. Using local polynomial regression (LOESS), we determined the best models representing the dynamics of microfilaremia over this period. In a second step, using cosinor models, we evaluated the influence of sex, age, and body temperature on the periodicity of L. loa microfilaremia in blood., Results: All subjects reached their maximum microfilaremia between 10:00 am and 4:00 pm. Individual microfilaremia showed different patterns between individuals, and some clearly showed multiple peaks within a day. LOESS provided a good fit to the observed data. Without adjustment, the maximum microfilarial density was reached around 11:00 am. Adjustment revealed three distinct modes of microfilaremia, occurring around 10:00 am, 1:00 pm, and 4:00 pm. Cosinor models also provided good fit to our data. After adjustment on body temperature, the L. loa microfilaremia fluctuation amplitude decreased significantly from 1684.8 to 310.6 microfilariae(mf)/ml and the predicted peak was estimated at 12:02 pm., Conclusions: We characterized the periodicity of L. loa microfilaremia mathematically with two different approaches: cosinor models and LOESS regression. Both models suggest that body temperature plays a role in the variation in microfilaremia within a day. Further studies are needed to identify individual co-factors affecting microfilaremia., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: A test-and-not-treat (TaNT) strategy has been developed to prevent people with high concentrations of circulating Loa loa microfilariae (>20 000 microfilariae per mL) developing serious adverse events after ivermectin treatment during mass drug administration to eliminate onchocerciasis. An important question related to cost and programmatic issues is whether annual retesting is required for everyone. We therefore aimed to investigate changes in L loa microfilarial densities during TaNT campaigns run 18 months apart., Methods: In this observational cohort study, we assessed the participants of two TaNT campaigns for onchocerciasis. These campaigns, which were run by a research team, together with personnel from the Ministry of Health and community health workers, were done in six health areas (in 89 communities) in Okola health district (Cameroon); the first campaign was run between Aug 10, and Oct 29, 2015, and the second was run between March 7, and May 26, 2017. All individuals aged 5 years and older were invited to be screened for Loa loa microfilaraemia before being offered ivermectin (unless contraindicated). L loa microfilarial density was measured at the point of care using the LoaScope. All those with a L loa microfilarial density of 20 000 microfilariae per mL or less were offered treatment; in the first 2 weeks of the 2015 campaign, a higher exclusion threshold of 26 000 microfilariae per mL or less was used. At both rounds of the intervention, participants were registered with a paper form, in which personal information were collected. In 2017, we also recorded whether each individual reported participation in the 2015 campaign. The primary outcome, assessed in all participants, was whether L loa microfilarial density was above or below the exclusion threshold (ie, the criteria that guided the decision to treat)., Findings: In the 2015 TaNT campaign, 26 415 people were censused versus 29 587 people in the 2017 TaNT campaign. All individuals aged 5 years and older without other contraindications to treatment (22 842 people in 2015 and 25 421 people in 2017) were invited to be screened for L loa microfilaraemia before being offered ivermectin. In 2015, 16 182 individuals were examined with the LoaScope, versus 18 697 individuals in the same communities in 2017. 344 (2·1%) individuals were excluded from ivermectin treatment because of a high L loa microfilarial density in 2015, versus 283 (1·5%) individuals in 2017 (p<0·0001). Records from 2017 could be matched to those from 2015 for 6983 individuals (43·2% of the 2015 participants). In this cohort, in 2017, 6981 (>99·9%) of 6983 individuals treated with ivermectin in 2015 had L loa microfilariae density below the level associated with neurological serious adverse events., Interpretation: Individuals treated with ivermectin do not need to be retested for L loa microfilaraemia before the next treatment, provided that they can be re-identified. This adjusted approach will enable substantial cost savings and facilitate reaching programmatic goals for elimination of onchocerciasis in areas that are co-endemic for loiasis., Funding: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Division of Intramural Research (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, US National Institutes of Health)., (Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

The specificity of skin snips for onchocerciasis diagnoses is considered to be almost 100%. Our molecular methods revealed that microfilariae emerging from skin snips collected from highly microfilaremic Loa loa-infected individuals were largely misidentified as Onchocerca volvulus. This has important implications for onchocerciasis diagnostic testing in Loa-endemic areas., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Endemic to Central Africa, loiasis - or African eye worm (caused by the filarial nematode Loa loa) - affects more than 10 million people. Despite causing ocular and systemic symptoms, it has typically been considered a benign condition, only of public health relevance because it impedes mass drug administration-based interventions against onchocerciasis and lymphatic filariasis in co-endemic areas. Recent research has challenged this conception, demonstrating excess mortality associated with high levels of infection, implying that loiasis warrants attention as an intrinsic public health problem. This review summarises available information on the key parasitological, entomological, and epidemiological characteristics of the infection and argues for the mobilisation of resources to control the disease, and the development of a mathematical transmission model to guide deployment of interventions., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Implementation of an ivermectin-based community treatment strategy for the elimination of onchocerciasis or lymphatic filariasis has been delayed in Central Africa because of the occurrence of serious adverse events, including death, in persons with high levels of circulating Loa loa microfilariae. The LoaScope, a field-friendly diagnostic tool to quantify L. loa microfilariae in peripheral blood, enables rapid, point-of-care identification of persons at risk for serious adverse events., Methods: A test-and-not-treat strategy was used in the approach to ivermectin treatment in the Okola health district in Cameroon, where the distribution of ivermectin was halted in 1999 after the occurrence of fatal events related to L. loa infection. The LoaScope was used to identify persons with an L. loa microfilarial density greater than 20,000 microfilariae per milliliter of blood, who were considered to be at risk for serious adverse events, and exclude them from ivermectin distribution. Active surveillance for posttreatment adverse events was performed daily for 6 days., Results: From August through October 2015, a total of 16,259 of 22,842 persons 5 years of age or older (71.2% of the target population) were tested for L. loa microfilaremia. Among the participants who underwent testing, a total of 15,522 (95.5%) received ivermectin, 340 (2.1%) were excluded from ivermectin distribution because of an L. loa microfilarial density above the risk threshold, and 397 (2.4%) were excluded because of pregnancy or illness. No serious adverse events were observed. Nonserious adverse events were recorded in 934 participants, most of whom (67.5%) had no detectable L. loa microfilariae., Conclusions: The LoaScope-based test-and-not-treat strategy enabled the reimplementation of community-wide ivermectin distribution in a heretofore "off limits" health district in Cameroon and is a potentially practical approach to larger-scale ivermectin treatment for lymphatic filariasis and onchocerciasis in areas where L. loa infection is endemic. (Funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and others.).

Since the mid-2000s, the immunochromatographic card test (ICT), a point-of-care test for detecting Wuchereria bancrofti circulating filarial antigens (CFAs), has been the backbone for mapping and monitoring lymphatic filariasis (LF) worldwide. Recently, there have been instances in which CFA positivity has been associated with Loa loa microfilaremia. Here, we examined the association, at both the community and individual levels, between L. loa and CFA using additional diagnostic tools (quantitative polymerase chain reaction [qPCR], Og4C3 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and IgG4 antibodies to Wb123 assays) to demonstrate the relationship between L. loa microfilaremia and ICT positivity. In May 2013, peripheral blood was collected during the day from 1,812 individuals living in southern Cameroon. ICT tests were done on the spot, and positive individuals were resampled at night. Results of qPCR and Wb123 assays concurred proving the absence of W. bancrofti infection. Og4C3 assays indicate a quantitative relationship between the level of L. loa microfilaremia and that of CFA. This was confirmed by epidemiological analyses, which reveal a strong association between L. loa microfilaremia and ICT positivity, with 50% of ICT reacting to L. loa when its microfilarial density exceeds 30,000 microfilariae/mL. At the community level, the proportion of positive ICT would exceed 2% when the prevalence of L. loa microfilaremia in the total population is above 20%. This has significant implications in terms of mapping and control of LF caused by W. bancrofti in Loa-endemic areas. Cross-reactivity of ICT with L. loa has to be considered in the context of both individual and community diagnostics., (© The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.)