Search

Background: Over the last decades relevant epidemiological changes of liver diseases have occurred, together with greatly improved treatment opportunities. Aim: To investigate how the indications for elective adult liver transplantation and the underlying disease etiologies have evolved in Italy. Methods: We recruited from the National Transplant Registry a cohort comprising 17,317 adults patients waitlisted for primary liver transplantation from January-2004 to December-2020. Patients were divided into three Eras:1(2004–2011),2(2012–2014) and 3(2015–2020). Results: Waitlistings for cirrhosis decreased from 65.9% in Era 1 to 46.1% in Era 3, while those for HCC increased from 28.7% to 48.7%. Comparing Eras 1 and 3, waitlistings for HCV-related cirrhosis decreased from 35.9% to 12.1%, yet those for HCV-related HCC increased from 8.5% to 26.7%. Waitlistings for HBV-related cirrhosis remained almost unchanged (13.2% and 12.4%), while those for HBV-related HCC increased from 4.0% to 11.6%. ALD-related cirrhosis decreased from 16.9% to 12.9% while ALD-related HCC increased from 1.9% to 3.9%. Conclusions: A sharp increase in liver transplant waitlisting for HCC and a concomitant decrease of waitlisting for cirrhosis have occurred In Italy. Despite HCV infection has noticeably decreased, still remains the primary etiology of waitlisting for HCC, while ALD and HBV represent the main causes for cirrhosis.

Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are at high risk of second primary malignancies. As HCC has become the leading indication of liver transplant (LT), the aim of this study was to investigate whether the presence of HCC before LT could influence the onset of de novo malignancies (DNM). A cohort study was conducted on 2653 LT recipients. Hazard ratios (HR) of DNM development for patients transplanted for HCC (HCC patients) were compared with those of patients without any previous malignancy (non-HCC patients). All models were adjusted for sex, age, calendar year at transplant, and liver disease etiology. Throughout 17 903 person-years, 6.6% of HCC patients and 7.4% of non-HCC patients developed DNM (202 cases). The median time from LT to first DNM diagnosis was shorter for solid tumors in HCC patients (2.7 vs 4.5 years for HCC and non-HCC patients, respectively, P

In the setting of liver transplant (LT), the survival after the diagnosis of de novo malignancies (DNMs) has been poorly investigated. In this study, we assessed the impact of DNMs on survival of LT recipients as compared to corresponding LT recipients without DNM. A nested case-control study was conducted in a cohort of 2,818 LT recipients enrolled in nine Italian centres between 1985 and 2014. Cases were 244 LT recipients who developed DNMs after LT. For each case, two controls matched for gender, age, and year at transplant were selected by incidence density sampling among cohort members without DNM. The survival probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratios (HRs) of death and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazard models. The all-cancer 10-year survival was 43% in cases versus 70% in controls (HR = 4.66; 95% CI: 3.17-6.85). Survival was impaired in cases for all the most frequent cancer types, including lung (HR = 37.13; 95% CI: 4.98-276.74), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (HR = 6.57; 95% CI: 2.15-20.01), head and neck (HR = 4.65; 95% CI: 1.81-11.95), and colon-rectum (HR = 3.61; 95% CI: 1.08-12.07). The survival gap was observed for both early and late mortality, although the effect was more pronounced in the first year after cancer diagnosis. No significant differences in survival emerged for Kaposi's sarcoma and nonmelanoma skin cancers. The survival gap herein quantified included a broad range of malignancies following LT and prompts close monitoring during the post-transplant follow-up to ensure early cancer diagnosis and to improve survival.

In the setting of liver transplant (LT), the survival after the diagnosis of de novo malignancies (DNMs) has been poorly investigated. In this study, we assessed the impact of DNMs on survival of LT recipients as compared to corresponding LT recipients without DNM. A nested case-control study was conducted in a cohort of 2,818 LT recipients enrolled in nine Italian centres between 1985 and 2014. Cases were 244 LT recipients who developed DNMs after LT. For each case, two controls matched for gender, age, and year at transplant were selected by incidence density sampling among cohort members without DNM. The survival probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratios (HRs) of death and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazard models. The all-cancer 10-year survival was 43% in cases versus 70% in controls (HR = 4.66; 95% CI: 3.17-6.85). Survival was impaired in cases for all the most frequent cancer types, including lung (HR = 37.13; 95% CI: 4.98-276.74), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (HR = 6.57; 95% CI: 2.15-20.01), head and neck (HR = 4.65; 95% CI: 1.81-11.95), and colon-rectum (HR = 3.61; 95% CI: 1.08-12.07). The survival gap was observed for both early and late mortality, although the effect was more pronounced in the first year after cancer diagnosis. No significant differences in survival emerged for Kaposi's sarcoma and nonmelanoma skin cancers. The survival gap herein quantified included a broad range of malignancies following LT and prompts close monitoring during the post-transplant follow-up to ensure early cancer diagnosis and to improve survival.

To implement split liver transplantation (SLT) a mandatory-split policy has been adopted in Italy since August 2015: donors aged 18-50years at standard risk are offered for SLT, resulting in a left-lateral segment (LLS) graft for children and an extended-right graft (ERG) for adults. We aim to analyze the impact of the new mandatory-split policy on liver transplantation (LT)-waiting list and SLT outcomes, compared to old allocation policy. Between August 2015 and December 2016 out of 413 potentially “splittable” donors, 252 (61%) were proposed for SLT, of whom 53 (21%) donors were accepted for SLT whereas 101 (40.1%) were excluded because of donor characteristics and 98 (38.9%) for absence of suitable pediatric recipients. The SLT rate augmented from 6% to 8.4%. Children undergoing SLT increased from 49.3% to 65.8% (P=.009) and the pediatric LT-waiting list time dropped (229 [10-2121] vs 80 [12-2503] days [P=.045]). The pediatric (4.5% vs 2.5% [P=.398]) and adult (9.7% to 5.2% [P20kg (HR=5.113, P=.048) in LLS, and ischemic time >8hours (HR=2.475, P=.048) in ERG were identified as predictors of graft failure. A national mandatory-split policy maximizes the SLT donor resources, whose selection criteria can be safely expanded, providing favorable impact on the pediatric LT-waiting list and priority for adult sick LT candidates.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV)-associated acute liver failure (ALF) is a dramatic clinical syndrome leading to death or liver transplantation in 80% of cases. Due to the extremely rapid clinical course, the difficulties in obtaining liver specimens, and the lack of an animal model, the pathogenesis of ALF remains largely unknown. Here, we performed a comprehensive genetic and functional characterization of the virus and the host in liver tissue from HBV-associated ALF and compared the results with those of classic acute hepatitis B in chimpanzees. In contrast with acute hepatitis B, HBV strains detected in ALF livers displayed highly mutated HBV core antigen (HBcAg), associated with increased HBcAg expression ex vivo, which was independent of viral replication levels. Combined gene and miRNA expression profiling revealed a dominant B cell disease signature, with extensive intrahepatic production of IgM and IgG in germline configuration exclusively targeting HBcAg with subnanomolar affinities, and complement deposition. Thus, HBV ALF appears to be an anomalous T cell-independent, HBV core-driven B cell disease, which results from the rare and unfortunate encounter between a host with an unusual B cell response and an infecting virus with a highly mutated core antigen.

Analysis of hepatitis C virus (HCV) replication and quasispecies distribution within the tumor of patients with HCV-associated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can provide insight into the role of HCV in hepatocarcinogenesis and, conversely, the effect of HCC on the HCV lifecycle. In a comprehensive study of serum and multiple liver specimens from patients with HCC who underwent liver transplantation, we found a sharp and significant decrease in HCV RNA in the tumor compared with surrounding nontumorous tissues, but found no differences in multiple areas of control non-HCC cirrhotic livers. Diminished HCV replication was not associated with changes in miR-122 expression. HCV genetic diversity was significantly higher in livers containing HCC compared with control non-HCC cirrhotic livers. Tracking of individual variants demonstrated changes in the viral population between tumorous and nontumorous areas, the extent of which correlated with the decline in HCV RNA, suggesting HCV compartmentalization within the tumor. In contrast, compartmentalization was not observed between nontumorous areas and serum, or in controls between different areas of the cirrhotic liver or between liver and serum. Our findings indicate that HCV replication within the tumor is restricted and compartmentalized, suggesting segregation of specific viral variants in malignant hepatocytes.

This study was a retrospective analysis of the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR) performed to compare long-term outcomes with prolonged-release tacrolimus versus tacrolimus BD in liver transplantation (January 2008-December 2012). Clinical efficacy measures included univariate and multivariate analyses of risk factors influencing graft and patient survival at 3 years posttransplant. Efficacy measures were repeated using propensity score-matching for baseline demographics. Patients with

This cohort study assessed, in Italy, the overall pattern of risk of de novo malignancies following liver transplantation (LT). The study group included 2,832 individuals who underwent LT between 1985 and 2014 in nine centers all over Italy. Person-years (PYs) at cancer risk were computed from 30 days after LT to the date of cancer diagnosis, to the date of death or to the end of follow-up. Excess cancer risk, as compared to the general population, was estimated using standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). During 18,642 PYs, 246 LT recipients developed 266 de novo malignancies, corresponding to a 1.8-fold higher cancer risk (95% CI: 1.6-2.0). SIRs were particularly elevated for virus-related malignancies, including Kaposi's sarcoma (SIR = 53.6, 95% CI: 30.0-88.5), non-Hodgkin lymphomas (SIR = 7.1, 95% CI: 4.8-10.1) and cervix uteri (SIR = 5.4, 95% CI: 1.1-15.8). Among virus-unrelated malignancies, elevated risks emerged for head and neck (SIR = 4.4, 95% CI: 3.1-6.2), esophagus (SIR = 6.7, 95% CI: 2.9-13.3) and adrenal gland (SIR = 22.9, 95% CI: 2.8-82.7). Borderline statistically significant elevated risks were found for lung cancer (SIR = 1.4, 95% CI: 1.0-2.1) and skin melanoma (SIR = 2.6, 95% CI: 1.0-5.3). A reduced risk emerged for prostate cancer (SIR = 0.1, 95% CI: 0.0-0.5). These findings underline the need of preventive interventions and early detection of malignancies, specifically tailored to LT recipients.

The shortage of organs and the increasing median age of deceased donors for orthotopic liver transplantation stimulate transplant centres to accept grafts that otherwise would have been discarded due to severe vascular abnormalities. We encountered a donor with two arterial aneurysms and a left accessory hepatic artery: an arterial aneurysm of the common hepatic artery and a left accessory hepatic artery arising from a second aneurysm of the left gastric artery (Michels type V). A complex reconstruction was created to transplant the liver. Multiple arterial anastomosis was made and the hepatic inflow of the transplanted liver restored. Although the procedure increased the risk of hepatic artery thrombosis, one more organ supposed to be discarded was saved.

Occult Hepatitis B virus (o-HBV) infection has been reported in HB surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative liver donors whose risk of transmitting HBV justifies a specific prophylaxis in liver recipients. The clinical significance of o-HBV infection in HBsAg-negative recipients and their need for prophylaxis is unknown. Liver samples collected during surgery from 23 HBsAg-negative patients (9 liver donors and 14 recipients) and 20 HBsAg-positive recipients (controls) were studied by polymerase chain reaction with an independent set of primers mapping the core and surface HBV genes. Intrahepatic HBV DNA was detected as core and surface genes in all the HBsAg-positive recipients, in none of the HBsAg-negative donors and in 9/14 (64%) of the HBsAg-negative recipients (2 HCV negative, 7 HCV positive). The intrahepatic amount of HBV was significantly lower in HBsAg-negative than in HBsAg-positive livers (median values 1.36 Log10/μg DNA vs. 3.66 Logs, p

The influence of steatosis and of other donor and recipient characteristics in affecting liver performance post-orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) was evaluated in 311 consecutive liver transplantations made in 278 patients. Donor variables considered were age, sex, blood group, cause of death, intensive care unit (ICU) days, need for vasopressors, hepatic enzymes and bilirubin, total and warm ischemia time, and macro- and microvescicular steatosis. Recipient variables considered were age, sex, blood group, biliary output, and post-OLT peak levels of hepatic enzymes. Patient and graft survival were the main outcome indicators. In the multivariate analysis, macrovescicular steatosis involving 25% or more of the hepatocytes was the only variable independently associated with shorter patient survival (p < 0.05). Five (62.5%) of the eight livers with macrovescicular steatosis involving 25% or more of the hepatocytes incurred in a delayed non-function (DNF) and one (12.5%) in a primary non-function (PRNF). The incidence of DNF and PRNF in the group with macrovescicular steatosis involving less than 25% of the liver cells was 1.6% (p < 0.001) and 2.3%, respectively. Microvescicular steatosis of any degree was not associated with a worse prognosis. Macrovescicular steatosis involving 25% or more of the hepatocytes identifies marginal livers, the use of which significantly increases the risk of graft non-function post-OLT.

Objective The objective of this study was to quantify incidence rates (IR) and risks of de novo tumors (except nonmelanoma skin cancers) in patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in central and southern Italy. Methods Data were collected on 1675 patients (75.5% males) who underwent OLT in six Italian transplantation centers in central and southern Italy (1990–2008). The time at risk of cancer (person years [PY]) was computed from OLT to the date of cancer diagnosis, death, or last follow-up, whichever occurred first. The number of observed cancer cases were compared with the expected one using data from population-based cancer registries. We computed gender- and age-standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results During 10,104.3 PYs (median follow-up, 5.2 years), 98 patients (5.9% of the total) were diagnosed with a de novo malignancy (for a total of 100 diagnoses). Twenty-two of these cancers were post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD; 18 non-Hodgkin lymphoma [NHL] and 2 Hodgkin's lymphoma [HL]), 6 were Kaposi's sarcoma (KS), and 72 were solid tumors (19 head and neck [H&N], 13 lung, 11 colon-rectum, 6 bladder, and 4 melanoma). The overall incidence was 9.9 cases/103 PYs, with a 1.4-fold significantly increased SIR (95% CI, l.2–1.7). Significantly increased SIRs were observed for KS (37.3), PTLD (3.9), larynx (5.7), melanoma (3.1), tongue (7.1), and H&N (4.5) cancers. Conclusions These results confirmed that OLT patients are at greater risk for cancer, mainly malignancies either virus-associated or related to pre-existent factors (eg, alcohols). These observations point to the need to improve cancer surveillance after OLT. The on-going enrollment of patients in the present cohort study will help to elucidate the burden of cancer after OLT and better identify risk factors associated with its development.

Introduction The liver has inherent regenerative capacity via mitotic division of mature hepatocytes or, when the hepatic loss is massive or hepatocyte proliferation is impaired, through activation of hepatic stem/progenitor cells (HSPC). The dramatic clinical course of acute liver failure (ALF) has posed major limitations to investigating the molecular mechanisms of liver regeneration and the role of HSPC in this setting. We investigated the molecular mechanisms of liver regeneration in 4 patients who underwent liver transplantation for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-associated ALF. Methods and Findings Gene expression profiling of 17 liver specimens from the 4 ALF cases and individual specimens from 10 liver donors documented a distinct gene signature for ALF. However, unsupervised multidimensional scaling and hierarchical clustering identified two clusters of ALF that segregated according to histopathological severity massive hepatic necrosis (MHN; 2 patients) and submassive hepatic necrosis (SHN; 2 patients). We found that ALF is characterized by a strong HSPC gene signature, along with ductular reaction, both of which are more prominent in MHN. Interestingly, no evidence of further lineage differentiation was seen in MHN, whereas in SHN we detected cells with hepatocyte-like morphology. Strikingly, ALF was associated with a strong tumorigenesis gene signature. MHN had the greatest upregulation of stem cell genes (EpCAM, CK19, CK7), whereas the most up-regulated genes in SHN were related to cellular growth and proliferation. The extent of liver necrosis correlated with an overriding fibrogenesis gene signature, reflecting the wound-healing process. Conclusion Our data provide evidence for a distinct gene signature in HBV-associated ALF whose intensity is directly correlated with the histopathological severity. HSPC activation and fibrogenesis positively correlated with the extent of liver necrosis. Moreover, we detected a tumorigenesis gene signature in ALF, emphasizing the close relationship between liver regeneration and liver cancer.

BACKGROUND: The Liver Match is an observational cohort study that prospectively enrolled liver transplantations performed at 20 out of 21 Italian Transplant Centres between June 2007 and May 2009. Aim of the study is to investigate the impact of donor/recipient matching on outcomes. In this report we describe the study methodology and provide a cross-sectional description of donor and recipient characteristics and of graft allocation. METHODS: Adult primary transplants performed with deceased heart-beating donors were included. Relevant information on donors and recipients, organ procurement and allocation were prospectively entered in an ad hoc database within the National Transplant Centre web-based Network. Data were blindly analysed by an independent Biostatistical Board. RESULTS: The study enrolled 1530 donor/recipient matches. Median donor age was 56 years. Female donors (n = 681, median 58, range 12-92 years) were older than males (n = 849, median 53, range 2-97 years, p < 0.0001). Donors older than 60 years were 42.2%, including 4.2% octogenarians. Brain death was due to non-traumatic causes in 1126 (73.6%) cases. Half of the donor population was overweight, 10.1% was obese and 7.6% diabetic. Hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) was present in 245 (16.0%) donors. The median Donor Risk Index (DRI) was 1.57 (>1.7 in 35.8%). The median cold ischaemia time was 7.3h (≥ 10 in 10.6%). Median age of recipients was 54 years, and 77.7% were males. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was the most frequent indication overall (44.4%), being a coindication in roughly 1/3 of cases, followed by viral cirrhosis without HCC (28.2%) and alcoholic cirrhosis without HCC (10.2%). Hepatitis C virus infection (with or without HCC) was the most frequent etiologic factor (45.9% of the whole population and 71.4% of viral-related cirrhosis), yet hepatitis B virus infection accounted for 28.6% of viral-related cirrhosis, and HBcAb positivity was found in 49.7% of recipients. The median Model for End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) at transplant was 12 in patients with HCC and 18 in those without. Multivariate analysis showed a slight but significant inverse association between DRI and MELD at transplant. CONCLUSIONS: The deceased donor population in Italy has a high-risk profile compared to other countries, mainly due to older donor age. Almost half of the grafts are transplanted in recipients with HCC. Higher risk donors tend to be preferentially allocated to recipients with HCC, who are usually less ill and older. No other relevant allocation strategy is currently adopted at national level.

The first Italian liver transplant center to reach the goal of 1000 procedures was Turin. The paper reports this single-center experience, highlighting the main changes that have occurred over time. From 1990 to 2002, 1000 consecutive liver transplants were performed in 910 patients, mainly cirrhotics. Surgical technique was based on the preservation of the retrohepatic vena cava of the recipient. The veno-venous bypass was used in 30 cases only and abandoned since 1997. Operating time, warm ischemia time and length of hospital stay significantly decreased over the years, while operating room extubation became routine. Immunosuppression pivoted on cyclosporine A. Management of retransplantations, marginal grafts, and of HCV-positive, HBV-positive and hepatocellular carcinoma recipients were optimized. Median follow-up of the patients was 41 months. Overall survival rates at 1, 5 and 10 years were 87%, 78% and 72% respectively. Survival rates obtained in the second half of the cases (1999-2002 period) were significantly better than those obtained in the first half (1990-1998 period) (90% vs. 83% at 1 year and 81% vs. 76% at 5 years respectively). Increasing experience in liver transplant surgery and postoperative care allowed standardization of the procedure and expansion of the activity, with parallel improvement of the results.

Liver transplantation involving living-related donors has been adopted in many centers as a way of relieving organ shortage. This study reviewed the anesthetic considerations for donor operations at our institution in relation to intraoperative blood transfusion, complications, and postoperative liver function test results. From January 1990 to May 2001, 30 living-related liver transplantations were performed at Baskent University Hospital, Ankara. The donor data used for analysis were retrospectively obtained through chart review, anesthesia records, and the computerized hospital database. Left lobectomy was performed in 19 cases, and left lateral segmentectomy in 11 cases. Intraoperatively, the average volume of intravenous fluids used was 6431±468 ml, and the average amount of blood transfused was 2.1±0.4 units. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 11.5±1.3 days. The only intraoperative complication observed in these 30 donors was severe bleeding during retrohepatic vena cava dissection in one of the cases. The postoperative complications related to anesthesia were one case each of shoulder pain, neuropraxia, and compartment syndrome. The levels of total and direct bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, and alanine aminotransferase peaked within the first 2 postoperative days (2.19±0.36 mg/dl, 1.02±0.18 mg/dl, 245.7±26.6 U/l, 313.5±51.9 U/l, respectively). In all 30 donors, these levels had normalized by 1 month after surgery. Maximal efforts must be applied in the anesthetic approach to minimize donor complications in living-related liver transplantation; however, this will not completely eliminate some risks to the donor.

Background. The risk of hepatic artery thrombosis after orthotopic liver transplantation is higher in cases of poor hepatic arterial inflow, small or anomalous recipient hepatic arteries, unsafe native hepatic arteries. Aims. To assess the use of arterial conduits as alternative technique for graft revascularization. Patients. At the Liver Transplant Center of the “sGiovanni Battista” Hospital in Torino, a review has been made of 600 consecutive orthotopic liver transplantations in 545 adult patients from 1990 to 1999. Methods. In 95 orthotopic liver transplantations (15.8%) in 88 patients, the graft was supplied by infrarenal conduit, while in 505 orthotopic liver transplantations (84.2%) in 457 patients, a direct anastomosis was used. Results and conclusions. The overall incidence of hepatic artery thrombosis in our series was 3.5% ( 21 600 ): 5.3% ( 5 91 ) for conduits and 3.2% ( 16 505 ) for standard technique (p=ns, χ test). The actuarial 5-year graft survival was 67.7% for conduits and 68.6% for the standard technique; p (log rank): ns. The iliac prosthesis torsion was the only complication related to the use of infrarenal iliac conduit. The arterial conduit, performed with donor iliac artery, is an effective and safe revascularization technique in patients at high risk of arterial thrombosis.

Background: During liver transplantation, an oversized graft or active bleeding in the hepatic area can make performance of the suprahepatic caval anastomosis extremely difficult or even impossible. In other instances, a brief as possible warm ischemia is desired to provide a marginal graft with maximum chances of good functioning. Methods: In order to manage those conditions, a suture technique was devised that allows the construction of a substantial part of the suprahepatic caval anastomosis keeping the graft outside the abdomen of the recipient. Results: Over a 12-month period, the technique was applied in 7 out of 148 transplants (5%). The 7 cases presented one or more of the following conditions: significant oversize mismatch (n = 6), active bleeding in the hepatic area (n = 1), and marginal graft (n = 4). Warm ischemia time averaged 27 minutes, a value not significantly different from the mean warm ischemia time of 25 minutes recorded in the easier transplants in which the conventional technique was used ( P = 0.2467). Conclusions: This extracorporeal suture technique allows construction of the suprahepatic caval anastomosis in critical situations arising during liver transplantation and avoidance of the prolonged warm ischemia that could be expected in such cases.

Background/Aims : Interferon (IFN) with ribavirin combination therapy (CT) was proposed for the treatment of hepatitis C recurring in liver transplants. We assessed the efficacy of two protocols of CT in transplanted patients with recurrent severe hepatitis C virus (HCV) hepatitis. Methods : Fifty-seven patients (68% genotype 1b) were treated with IFN alfa-2b 3 million units three times weekly and oral ribavirin 800mg/die for 6 or 12 months. Study end-points were the end of treatment (ETVR) and the 12-month post-therapy sustained virologic response (SVR; negative HCV-RNA). Results : ETVR was induced in 9/27 (33%) and in 7/30 patients (23%) treated, respectively, for 6 and 12 months ( P =0.4); a SVR was induced in six (22%) of the former and five (17%) of the latter ( P =0.4). HCV genotype non-1 patients responded better than genotype 1 (SVR: 43% in genotype non-1 versus 12% in genotype 1, P : 0.02). In ETV responders the hepatitis activity index improved by >2 points in biopsies taken after therapy compared to pre-therapy biopsies. Anemia and leukopenia required reduction of therapy in 51% of the patients. Conclusions : CT is efficacious in controlling HCV disease in about 20% of transplants with recurrent hepatitis C. Six months of therapy are as efficacious as 12 months.

In the transplanted organ, early after reperfusion, a consistent while usually transient tissue damage is detectable which could interfere with appropriate recovery and function. In the case of transplanted human liver, a certain degree of cytolysis as well as post-hepatic cholestasis have actually been monitored early after surgery (Ericzon et al., 1990; Biasi et al., 1995). Then, studies addressed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying post-transplantation liver injury are necessary. The inflammatory process which always follows a cytolytic event generates a variety of molecules actually able to modulate not only cellular function but also its genetic program. Hence, extent and duration of flogistic reactions should be controlled for not being overwhelming tissue and organ homeostasis.

s of the 46th A.I.S.F. Annual Meeting 2013 / Digestive and Liver Disease 45S (2013), S1–S48 S7 the increase of HRR. The analysis of survival benefit comparing the risk of waiting list drop-out with the mortality of the 170 transplanted patients with same HRR, showed an important benefit for LT in patients with HRR>16.3. Conclusions: In patients with MELD

206 THE UN-SUSTAINABLE MATCH IN HCV LIVER TRANSPLANT PATIENTS A.W. Avolio, S. Agnes, M.C. Lirosi, M. Salizzoni, A. Pinna, B. Gridelli, L. De Carlis, M. Colledan, G. Gerunda, U. Valente, G. Rossi, G. Ettorre, A. Risaliti, V. Mazzaferro, F. Bresadola, M. Rossi, G. Tisone, F. Zamboni, L. Lupo, O. Cuomo, F. Calise, A. Vitale, N. Nicolotti, R. Romagnoli, A. Cucchetti, S. Gruttadauria, I. Mangoni, D. Pinelli, R. Montalti, M. Gelli, L. Caccamo, G. Vennarecci, D. Nicolini, E. Regalia, U. Baccarani, Q. Lai, T. Manzia, E. Tondolo, M. Rendina, A. Perrella, E. Scuderi, B. Antonelli, C. de Waure, M. Angelico, P. Burra, A. Gasbarrini, U. Cillo, Donor-to-Recipient Italian Liver Transplant (DR2-ILTx) Study Group. Liver Transplant Center, “A.Gemelli”Hospital, Catholic University, Rome, Liver Transplant Center, “S. Giovanni Battista” Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Liver Transplant Center, “S. Orsola” Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Liver Transplant Center, IsMeTT-UPMC, Palermo, Liver TransplantCenter, “Niguarda” Hospital, Milan, Liver Transplant Center, “Ospedali Riuniti”, Bergamo, Liver Transplant Center, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Liver Transplant Center, “S. Martino” Hospital, University of Genoa, Genoa, Liver Transpantation Center, IRCCS Foundation, “Maggiore” Hospital, Milan, Liver Transplant Center, “San Camillo-Forlanini” Hospital, Rome, Liver Transplant Center, “Umberto I” Hospital, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Liver Transplant Center, National Cancer Institute, IRCCS Foundation, Milan, Liver Transplant Center, University of Udine, Udine, Liver Transplant Center, “Umberto I” Hospital, “La Sapienza” University, Liver Transplant Center, “Tor Vergata” University Hospital, Rome, Liver Transplant Center, “G. Brotzu” University Hospital, Cagliari, Liver Transplant Center, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplant, University of Bari, Bari, Liver Transplant Center, Laparoscopic Hepatobiliary Surgical Unit, “A. Cardarelli” University Hospital, Liver Transplant Center, Hepatobiliary Surgical Unit, “A. Cardarelli” University Hospital, Naples, Liver Transplant Center, Department of Surgical and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padua, Padova, Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Hygiene, Catholic University, Rome, Italy E-mail: alfonso.avolio@tin.it