Search

Introduction: Single-port (SP) robotic surgical system performs well in small anatomical spaces, which makes it suitable for retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN). However, there is limited evidence comparing the safety and feasibility of SP RPN to multiport (MP) RPN. To address this gap in evidence, we sought to analyze and compare the safety of retroperitoneal RPN between SP and MP approaches., Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study using data from the Single Port Advanced Research Consortium (SPARC) and a multicenter database of patients who underwent retroperitoneal RPN using either SP or MP between 2017 and 2023. Baseline, perioperative, and postoperative data were compared using t-tests, Mann-Whitney U test, χ 2 test, and Fisher exact test. Multivariable analyses were conducted using robust and Poisson regressions., Results: A total of 286 patients (SP RPN, n = 86 [30%]; MP RPN, n = 200 [70%]) underwent retroperitoneal RPN. R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score and tumor location were significantly different between the 2 groups. Notably, the ischemia time was significantly shorter in the MP group (16 vs. SP, 22 minutes, P < 0.001). Adjusting for baseline characteristics, the ischemia time was approximately 7.89 minutes longer for patients in the SP group compared to the MP group, on average (95% CI: 5.87, 9.92; P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in operative time, EBL, blood transfusion, conversion rates, LOS, PSM, and overall 30-day postoperative complications between the 2 groups., Conclusion: Our study shows that retroperitoneal SP and MP RPN have comparable perioperative and postoperative outcomes, except for the longer ischemia time in the SP platform. SP RPN is a safe and viable alternative; however, further research is needed to explore its potential benefits, cost-effectiveness, and long-term oncologic outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Jihad H. Kaouk reports a relationship with Intuitive Surgical Inc that includes: consulting or advisory and speaking and lecture fees. Mutahar Ahmed reports a relationship with Intuitive Surgical Inc that includes: consulting or advisory and speaking and lecture fees. Michael Stifelman reports a relationship with Intuitive Surgical Inc that includes: board membership, consulting or advisory, and speaking and lecture fees. Simone Crivellaro reports a relationship with Intuitive Surgical Inc that includes: consulting or advisory. Ronney Abaza reports a relationship with Intuitive Surgical Inc that includes: speaking and lecture fees. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Single-port (SP) robotic surgery is a novel technology, and although there is emerging data, it remains limited in assessing single-port (SP) robot-assisted surgery as an alternative to multi-port (MP) platforms. To compare perioperative and postoperative outcomes between SP and MP robotic technologies for radical nephrectomy (RN). This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who have undergone robot-assisted radical nephrectomy using either the SP or MP technology. Baseline demographics, clinical, tumor-specific characteristics, and perioperative and postoperative outcomes were compared using χ 2 , t-test, Fisher exact test, and Mann-Whitney U test. Multivariable analyses were conducted using robust, Poisson, and logistic regressions. A total of 341 patients underwent robotic RN with 47 patients (14%) in the SP group. The two groups exhibited similar baseline characteristics, with no significant differences in age, sex, body mass index, Charlson comorbidities index, and tumor laterality. However, SP group had a smaller average tumor size (5.1 cm vs 6.4 cm, p = 0.009). The SP had longer operative time (178 ± 84 min vs 142 ± 75 min; p = 0.011) but showed no significant difference in the estimated blood loss, blood transfusion rate, length of stay, overall 30-day and major complication rates. Controlling for other variables, SP was significantly associated with a longer operative time and shorter length of stay. SP is associated with longer operative time but offers advantages such as smaller incisions and shorter hospital stays with a comparative safety profile to MP for radical nephrectomy., Competing Interests: Declarations Conflict of interest Kennedy E Okhawere certifies that all conflicts of interest, including specific financial interests and relationships and affiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript (e.g., employment/affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, or patents filed, received, or pending), are the following: Dr. Ronney Abaza is a lecturer for Intuitive Surgical Inc. and VTI Inc. Dr. Michael Stifelman is on the scientific advisory board of Intuitive Surgery and has an educational agreement with Ethicon. Dr. Mutahar Ahmed is a consultant for CONMED and Intuitive Surgical. Dr. Jihad Kaouk is a consultant for Intuitive Surgical. The remaining authors declare that they have no relevant financial interest. Ethical approval Before involving any centers or recruiting participants, the study secured the necessary approvals from the relevant institutional ethics review boards and established data sharing agreements. Consent to participate Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study. Consent to publish Not applicable., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: We aim to identify factors associated with surgical refusal and non-surgical candidacy in clinical stage I kidney masses and to evaluate their impact on overall survival (OS)., Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Database of patients with clinical stage I kidney cancer between 2004 and 2017. Logistic regression was used to determine baseline sociodemographic-, clinical-, and treatment facility-related factors associated with surgical refusal and non-surgical candidacy. Patients were 1.1 propensity score-matched and Cox regression analysis evaluated the impact of surgical refusal and non-surgical candidacy on OS., Results: Compared to those who underwent surgery, those who refused surgery and those who were non-surgical candidates were more likely to be older, female, non-Hispanic (NH) Black, uninsured, have multiple comorbidities, and traveled a shorter distance to care. Similarly, compared to non-surgical candidates, those who refused surgery were more likely to be younger and have a tumor size ≥ 4.0 cm. Those who refused surgery had significantly lower median survival time and worse OS than those who underwent surgery (HR: 3.18, 95% CI: 2.85, 3.54). Non-surgical candidates had significantly lower median survival time and lower OS than those who had surgery (HR: 4.16, 95% CI: 3.84, 4.51)., Conclusion: Various socioeconomic, demographic, and clinical factors are associated with patients refusing to undergo surgery, which in turn leads to lower overall survival rates in stage I kidney cancer patients. Recognizing these factors will enable healthcare professionals to address and potentially alleviate these issues, ultimately ensuring that patients receive the most appropriate care.

Single Port (SP) robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) can be performed via retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approach. We aim to compare outcomes of two commonly described incisions for retroperitoneal SP RPN: lateral flank approach (LFA) and low anterior access (LAA). We performed a retrospective study of patients who underwent SP retroperitoneal RPN from 2018 to 2023 as part of a large multi-institute collaboration (SPARC). Baseline demographic, clinical, tumor-specific characteristics, and perioperative outcomes were compared using χ2, t test, Fisher exact test, and Mann-Whitney U test. Multivariable analyses were conducted using robust and logistic regressions. A total of 70 patients underwent SP retroperitoneal RPN, with 44 undergoing LAA. Overall, there were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. The LAA group exhibited significantly lower median RENAL scores (8 vs. 5, p < 0.001) and more varied tumor locations (p = 0.002). In the bivariate analysis, there were no statistically significant differences in ischemia time, estimated blood loss, or complication rates between the groups. However, the LAA group had longer operative times (101 vs. 134 min, p < 0.001), but was more likely to undergo a same-day discharge (p < 0.001). When controlling for other variables, LAA was associated with shorter ischemia time (p = 0.005), but there was no significant difference in operative time (p = 0.348) and length of stay (p = 0.122). Both LFA and LAA are acceptable approaches for SP retroperitoneal RPN with comparable perioperative outcomes. This early data suggests the LAA is more versatile for varying tumor locations; however, larger cohort studies are needed to ascertain whether there is an overall difference in patient recovery., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Background: In the surgical management of kidney tumors, such as in multiport technology, single-port (SP) robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) can be performed using the transperitoneal (TP) or retroperitoneal (RP) approach. However, there is a dearth of literature on the efficacy and safety of either approach for SP RAPN., Objective: To compare the peri- and postoperative outcomes of the TP and RP approaches for SP RAPN., Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a retrospective cohort study using data from the Single Port Advanced Research Consortium (SPARC) database of five institutions. All patients underwent SP RAPN for a renal mass between 2019 and 2022., Intervention: TP versus RP SP RAPN., Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: Baseline characteristics, and peri- and postoperative outcomes were compared between both the approaches using χ 2 test, Fisher exact test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Student t test., Results and Limitations: A total of 219 patients (121 [55.25%] TP, 98 [44.75%] RP) were included in the study. Of them, 115 (51.51%) were male, and the mean age was 60 ± 11 yr. RP had a significantly higher proportion of posterior tumors (54 [55.10%] RP vs 28 [23.14%] TP, p < 0.001), while other baseline characteristics were comparable between both the approaches. There was no statistically significant difference in ischemia time (18 ± 9 vs 18 ± 11 min, p = 0.898), operative time (147 ± 67 vs 146 ± 70 min, p = 0.925), estimated blood loss (p = 0.167), length of stay (1.06 ± 2.25 vs 1.33 ± 1.05 d, p = 0.270), overall complications (5 [5.10%] vs 7 [5.79%]), and major complication rate (2 [2.04%] vs 2 [1.65%], p = 1.000). No difference was observed in positive surgical margin rate (p = 0.472) or delta eGFR at median 6-mo follow-up (p = 0.273). Limitations include retrospective design and no long-term follow-up., Conclusions: With proper patient selection based on patient and tumor characteristics, surgeons can opt for either the TP or the RP approach for SP RAPN, and maintain satisfactory outcomes., Patient Summary: The use of a single port (SP) is a novel technology for performing robotic surgery. Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is a surgery to remove a portion of the kidney due to kidney cancer. Depending on patient characteristics and surgeons' preference, SP can be performed via two approaches for RAPN: through the abdomen or through the space behind the abdominal cavity. We compared outcomes between these two approaches for patients receiving SP RAPN, finding that they were comparable. We conclude that with proper patient selection based on patient and tumor characteristics, surgeons can opt for either the TP or the RP approach for SP RAPN, and maintain satisfactory outcomes., (Copyright © 2023 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Despite the wide-spread adoption of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS), the cost-benefit implications for partial (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) versus laparoscopic surgery (Lap) is not well established. We sought to examine the trend of adoption and 1-year healthcare expenditure of PN and RN, and compare 1-year expenditures of RAS versus Lap for PN and RN., Patients and Methods: This cohort study used the Merative TM MarketScan® Databases between 2013 and 2020. A total of 5,353 patients with kidney cancer undergoing PN (2,980, 55.7%) or RN (2,373, 44.3%). We compared open-conversion, length of stay (LOS), index expenditure, 1-year healthcare expenditure and utilization, and missed work-days between RAS and Lap for PN and RN., Results: Adoption of PN increased overtime (47.0% to 55.8%), mainly driven by robotic PN increase. Among PN, RAS had lower open-conversion, shorter LOS and lower index expenditure than Lap. Among RN, RAS had shorter LOS, and similar open-conversion and index expenditures. During 1-year post-discharge, RAS had lower hospital outpatient visits (IRR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.85, 0.99, p = 0.029) and office-based visits (IRR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.86, 0.96, p = 0.002) for PN, translating to a 1-day less (95% CI = 0.25, 1.75, p = 0.008) missed from work for RAS. Following RN, RAS had lower 1-year readmission than Lap (O.R = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.55, 0.94, p = 0.018). RAS and Lap had comparable 1-year post-discharge expenditures for both PN (mean difference, MD = -$475, 95% CI = -$4362, $3412, p = 0.810) and RN (MD = -$4,204, 95% CI = -$13,837, $5430, p = 0.404)., Conclusion: At index surgery, RAS was associated with shorter LOS for both PN and RN, and lower open-conversion and expenditures for PN. RAS and Lap had comparable 1-year total expenditures, despite lower healthcare visits for RAS., (© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Partial nephrectomy (PN) is an alternative to radical nephrectomy (RN) in the appropriate localized renal tumor. The scope of PN has expanded over time and, since the advent and proliferation of minimally invasive surgery, more surgeons have access to and have been trained in laparoscopic and robotic technology. Amid the changing surgical landscape, we sought to characterize the trends in management by cancer stage, institution type, and geographic location using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). We queried the NCDB for patients with kidney cancer from 2004 to 2019. Overall, 241,311 patients who underwent PN or RN were included in the study. The nephrectomy approach was categorized as robotic partial (RPN), robotic radical (RRN), laparoscopic partial (LPN), laparoscopic radical (LRN), open or unspecified partial (OPN), and open or unspecified radical (ORN). The categorical variables were presented as frequency and percentages. Overall, there was an increase in the utilization of robotic approaches from 2010 to 2019. For cT1 tumors, the use of RPN and RRN increased from 14.27 to 33.06% and 5.24% to 19.63%, respectively. The use of ORN for cT2 and cT3 tumors declined, with rates dropping from 54.71 to 10.76% and 64.71 to 46.64%, respectively. Conversely, the utilization of RRN rose during this period. However, ORN remained the most common approach for cT3 tumors. The use of RPN increased across different facility types, with the highest utilization observed in academic/research programs. The use of ORN for cT2 and cT3 tumors declined across facility types, although it remained most prevalent in community cancer programs. The use of robot-assisted surgery to treat localized renal cancer increased in the US between 2010 and 2019 across all stages of disease. RPN became the most used approach for cT1 disease, while LRN was preferred for cT2 disease. ORN remained the approach of choice for cT3 disease throughout the study period. Trends in facility type and geographic location largely mirrored the overall trends., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: We aim to compare transperitoneal (TP) and retroperitoneal (RP) robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) in obese patients. Obesity and RP fat can complicate RPN, especially in the RP approach where working space is limited. Materials and Methods: Using a multi-institutional database, we analyzed 468 obese patients undergoing RPN for a renal mass (86 [18.38%] RP, 382 [81.62%] TP). Obesity was defined as body mass index ≥30 kg/m 2 * . A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed adjusting for age, previous abdominal surgery, tumor size, R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score, tumor location, surgical date, and participating centers. Baseline characteristics and perioperative and postoperative data were compared. Results: In the propensity score-matched cohort, 79 (50%) TP patients were matched with 79 (50%) RP patients. The RP group had more posterior tumors (67 [84.81%], RP versus 23 [29.11%], TP; P  < .001), while the other baseline characteristics were comparable. Warm ischemia time (interquartile range; 15 [10, 12], RP versus 14 [10, 17] minutes, TP; P  = .216), operative time (129 [116, 165], RP versus 130 [95, 180] minutes, TP; P  = .687), estimated blood loss (50 [50, 100], RP versus 75 [50, 150] mL, TP; P  = .129), length of stay (1 [1, 1], RP versus 1 [1, 2] day, TP; P  = .319), and major complication rate (1 [1.27%], RP versus 3 [3.80%], TP; P  = .620) were similar. No significant difference was observed in positive surgical margin rate and delta estimated glomerular filtration at follow-up. Conclusion: TP and RP RPN yielded similar perioperative and postoperative outcomes in obese patients. Obesity should not be a factor in determining optimal approach for RPN.

We aim to describe the perioperative and oncological outcomes for salvage robotic partial nephrectomy (sRPN) and salvage robotic radical nephrectomy (sRRN). Using a prospectively maintained multi-institutional database, we compared baseline clinical characteristics and perioperative and postoperative outcomes, including pathological stage, tumor histology, operative time, ischemia time, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS), postoperative complication rate, recurrence rate, and mortality. We identified a total of 58 patients who had undergone robotic salvage surgery for a recurrent renal mass, of which 22 (38%) had sRRN and 36 (62%) had sRPN. Ischemia time for sRPN was 14 min. The median EBL was 100 mL in both groups (p = 0.581). One intraoperative complication occurred during sRRN, while three occurred during sRPN cases (p = 1.000). The median LOS was 2 days for sRRN and 1 day for sRPN (p = 0.039). Postoperatively, one major complication occurred after sRRN and two after sRPN (p = 1.000). The recurrence reported after sRRN was 5% and 3% after sRPN. Among the patients who underwent sRRN, the two most prevalent stages were pT1a (27%) and pT3a (27%). Similarly, the two most prevalent stages in sRPN patients were pT1a (69%) and pT3a (6%). sRRN and sRPN have similar operative and perioperative outcomes. sRPN is a safe and feasible procedure when performed by experienced surgeons. Future studies on large cohorts are essential to better characterize the importance and benefit of salvage partial nephrectomies., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: Highly complex renal masses pose a challenge to urologic surgeons' ability to perform robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN). Given the increased utilization of the robotic approach for small renal masses, we sought to characterize the outcomes and determine the safety and feasibility of RPN for complex renal masses from our large multi-institutional cohort., Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Scores ≥10 who underwent RPN in our multi-institutional cohort (N = 372). Baseline demographic, clinical and tumor related characteristics were evaluated with the primary endpoint of trifecta achievement (defined as negative surgical margin, no major complications, and warm ischemia time ≤25 min). Relationships between variables were assessed using the chi-square test of independence, Fisher exact test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Kruskal Wallis test. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship between baseline characteristics and trifecta achievement., Results: Of 372 patients in the study, mean age was 58 years, and median BMI was 30.49 kg/m 2 . The median tumor size was 4.3 cm (3.0-5.9 cm). Most of the patients had R.E.N.A.L. scores of 10 (n = 253; 67.01%). Overall, trifecta was achieved in 72.04% of patients. Stratifying intraoperative and postoperative outcomes by R.E.N.A.L. scores, there was no significant difference in trifecta achievement, operative time, warm ischemia time (WIT), open conversion, major complication, or positive margin rates. Length of hospital stay was significantly longer for higher R.E.N.A.L. scores (median days 2 vs. 1, P = 0.012). Multivariate analyses for factors associated with trifecta achievement concluded that age and baseline eGFR were independently associated with trifecta achievement., Conclusion: RPN is a safe and reproducible procedure for complex tumors with R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry scores ≥10. Our results suggest excellent rates of trifecta achievement and short-term functional outcomes when performed by experienced surgeons. Long-term oncological and functional evaluation are needed to further support this conclusion., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To profile the cell-free urine supernatant and plasma of a small cohort of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) patients by measuring the relative concentrations of 92 proteins related to inflammation. Using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), we then performed a targeted mRNA analysis of genes encoding the above proteins and defined their effects on overall survival (OS)., Subjects/patients and Methods: Samples were collected prospectively from ccRCC patients. A multiplex proximity extension assay was used to measure the concentrations of 92 inflammation-related proteins in cell-free urine supernatants and plasma. Transcriptomic and clinical information from ccRCC patients was obtained from TCGA. Unsupervised clustering and differential protein expression analyses were performed on protein concentration data. Targeted mRNA analysis on genes encoding significant differentially expressed proteins was performed using TCGA. Backward stepwise regression analyses were used to build a nomogram. The performance of the nomogram and clinical benefit was assessed by discrimination and calibration, and a decision curve analysis, respectively., Results: Unsupervised clustering analysis revealed inflammatory signatures in the cell-free urine supernatant of ccRCC patients. Backward stepwise regressions using TCGA data identified transcriptomic risk factors and risk groups associated with OS. A nomogram to predict 2-year and 5-year OS was developed using these risk factors. The decision curve analysis showed that our model was associated with a net benefit improvement compared to the treat-all/none strategies., Conclusion: We defined four novel biomarkers using proteomic and transcriptomic data that distinguish severity of prognosis in ccRCC. We showed that these biomarkers can be used in a model to predict 2-year and 5-year OS in ccRCC across different tumour stages. This type of analysis, if validated in the future, provides non-invasive prognostic information that could inform either management or surveillance strategies for patients., (© 2023 BJU International.)

Introduction: Nephron-sparing surgery is important in patients with multiple renal tumors, especially if associated with a solitary kidney or hereditary syndrome. Prior studies have shown partial nephrectomy (PN) of multiple ipsilateral renal masses to have good oncologic and renal function outcomes. We aim to compare renal function changes, complications, and warm ischemia time (WIT) of partial nephrectomy of a single renal mass (sPN) vs those of partial nephrectomy of multiple ipsilateral renal masses (mPN). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our multi-institutional PN database. We matched robotic sPN and mPN patients ∼3:1 using "nearest neighbor" propensity score matching based on age, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), total tumor size, and nephrometry score. Univariate analysis was performed, and multivariable models were fit controlling for age, gender, CCI, and tumor size. Results: Fifty mPN and 146 sPN patients were matched. The mean total tumor size was 3.3 and 3.2 cm, respectively ( p  = 0.363). The mean nephrometry score in both groups was 7.3 and 7.2, respectively ( p  = 0.772). Estimated blood loss (EBL) was 137.6 and 117.8 mL, respectively ( p  = 0.184). The mPN group had higher operative time (174.6 vs 156.4 minutes, p  = 0.008) and WIT (17.0 vs 15.3 minutes, p  = 0.032). There was no significant difference in the change in glomerular filtration rate (mPN -6.4% vs sPN -8.7%, p  = 0.712). Complications (Clavien 2+) occurred in 10.2% of mPN and 11.3% of sPN patients ( p  = 0.837). A multivariable linear model predicts a nonstatistically significant difference of 1.4 minutes of additional WIT in the mPN group ( p  = 0.242). There was no statistical difference in complication rates between groups in a multivariable model (odds ratio 1.00, p  = 0.991). Conclusions: Robotic PN in our multi-institutional matched comparison of mPN and sPN showed no difference in complications, renal functional outcomes, or EBL. mPN was associated with increased operative time and WIT, though the WIT difference was not significant on multivariable analysis.

Objective: To describe the most recent surgical, functional, and oncological outcomes of RPN utilizing one of the largest, prospectively maintained, multi-institution consortium of patients undergoing robotic renal surgery., Materials and Methods: Data was obtained from a prospectively maintained multi-institutional database of patients who underwent RPN for clinically localized kidney cancer between 2018 and 2022 by 9 high-volume surgeons. Demographic and tumor characteristics as well as operative, functional, and oncological outcomes were queried., Results: A total of 2836 patients underwent RPN. Intraoperative, postoperative, and 30-day major complication rates were 2.68%, 11.39%, and 3.24%, respectively. Median tumor size was 3.0 cm. Tumors with low complexity had a shorter median operative time, lower median EBL, shorter median ischemia time, lower postoperative complication rate, and lower decline in renal function There was no significant difference between tumor complexities with respect to the rate of conversion to radical nephrectomy, conversion to open, major complications, and positive margins. Lower BMI, smaller clinical tumor size, lower tumor complexity, and higher baseline eGFR were significantly associated with trifecta achievement., Conclusion: Patient BMI, baseline eGFR, and tumor characteristics such as size and complexity are the most important predictors of trifecta achievement. Patients with complex tumors should be counseled that they are at increased risk of complications and worsening renal function after robotic partial nephrectomy., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Standardization of surgical steps or techniques can decrease error rates, increase efficiency, and ensure reproducible outcomes. In this study, we aimed to analyze the benefit of a standardized approach to robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) on the reproducibility of outcomes across different tumor complexities. Methods: A single-center study of patients who have undergone a transperitoneal robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy for kidney cancer using the first assistant sparing technique between May 2014 and March 2022 was performed. Overall, 496 patients were included in the analysis. We compared clinical data and perioperative and postoperative outcomes for low, moderate, and high complexity score renal tumors. Tumor complexity was stratified using the Radius, Exophytic/Endophytic, Nearness to the collecting system or sinus, Anterior/Posterior, Location relative to the polar line nephrometry score. Data were compared using Kruskal-Wallis test, Chi-square test of Independence, and Fisher's exact test. Results: Of the patients in the study, 54.64% were low tumor complexities ( n  = 271), 40.32% were moderate tumor complexities ( n  = 200), and 5.04% were high tumor complexities ( n  = 25). High tumor complexity patients had significantly longer operative time (149 minutes versus 137 minutes moderate complexity versus 125 minutes low complexity, P  = .001), longer ischemia time (12 minutes versus 11 minutes intermediate versus 10 minutes low complexity, P  = .0001), and significant reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (-12.58 mL/min/1.73 m 2 versus -5.51 mL/min/1.73 m 2 intermediate versus -3.08 mL/min/1.73 m 2 low complexity, P  = .005). There was no significant difference in estimated blood loss ( P  = .074), blood transfusion rate ( P  = .454), postoperative complication rate ( P  = .527), surgical complication rate ( P  = .210), major complication rate ( P  = .098), length of hospital stay ( P  = .583), positive surgical margins ( P  = .872), and trifecta achievement ( P  = .740). Conclusion: Irrespective of tumor complexity, approaching RPN using a standardized approach will offer patients favorable perioperative outcomes. This approach has standardized our preoperative counseling, patient expectation, and postoperative surgical pathway across the tumor complexity spectrum.

Introduction: Retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) has been shown to have comparable outcomes to the transperitoneal approach for renal tumors. However, this may not be true for completely endophytic tumors as they pose significant challenges in RPN with increased complication rates. Hence, we sought to compare the safety and feasibility of retroperitoneal RPN to transperitoneal RPN for completely endophytic tumors., Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent RPN for a completely endophytic renal mass using either transperitoneal or retroperitoneal approach from our multi-institutional database (n = 177). Patients who had a solitary kidney, prior ipsilateral surgery, multiple/bilateral tumors, and horseshoe kidneys were excluded from the analysis. Overall, 156 patients were evaluated (112 [71.8%] transperitoneal, 44 [28.2%] retroperitoneal). Baseline characteristics, perioperative and postoperative data were compared between the surgical transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approach using Chi-square test, Fishers exact test, t test, Mood median test and Mann Whitney U test., Results: Of the 156 patients in this study, 86 (56.9%) were male and the mean (SD) age was 58 (13) years. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the 2 approaches. Compared to transperitoneal approach, retroperitoneal approach had similar ischemia time (19.6 [SD = 7.6] minutes vs. 19.5 [SD = 10.2] minutes, P = 0.952), operative time (157.5 [SD = 44.8] minutes vs. 160.2 [SD = 47.3] minutes, P = 0.746), median estimated blood loss (50 ml [IQR: 50, 150] vs. 100 ml [IQR: 50, 200], P = 0.313), median length of stay (1 [IQR: 1, 2] day vs. 1 [IQR: 1, 2] day, P = 0.126) and major complication rate (2 [4.6%] vs. 3 [2.7%], P = 0.621). No difference was observed in positive surgical margin rate (P = 0.1.00), delta eGFR (P = 0.797) and de novo chronic kidney disease occurrence (P = 1.000)., Conclusion: Retroperitoneal and transperitoneal RPN yielded similar perioperative and functional outcomes in patients with completely endophytic tumors. In well-selected patients with purely endophytic tumors, either a retroperitoneal or transperitoneal approach could be considered without compromising perioperative and postoperative outcomes., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest None., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To assesses the complexity, reliability, and quality of the most popular kidney cancer videos on YouTube., Methods: We searched YouTube using phrases relevant to kidney cancer and grouped videos based on publishing channel type. Video parameters along with complexity, reliability, and quality scores were recorded. Video complexity was determined using the SMOG index. SMOG scores greater than 6.4 equate to content that is too complex for the general public. Video quality and reliability was scored by 5 reviewers using the Global Quality Scale and a modified DISCERN criteria. All categorical and numerical variables were analyzed via independent t-test and 1-way analysis of variance using SPSS., Results: One hundred twenty-one videos were analyzed. The most popular publishing channel types are professional development (n = 65), medical institutions (n = 27), student education (n = 9), and nonprofit organization (n = 4). Professional development videos are significantly more complex than medical institution videos (mean SMOG score of 11.1 vs. 9.4, P = 0.004), and nonprofit organization videos (11.1 vs. 7.8, P = 0.003). Compared to medical institution videos, professional development videos have fewer mean total views (876 views vs. 17,554, P = 0.016), mean views per month (14.92 views vs. 351.7, P = 0.007), and mean comments (1 comment vs. 18, P = 0.038). Both professional development videos and medical institution videos are more reliable than student education videos (mean DISCERN score of 3.9 vs. 2.9, P < 0.001)., Conclusion: There is a lack of understandable and reliable kidney cancer videos on YouTube. Moreover, the majority of kidney cancer videos are intended for medical professionals and may be too complex for the general public. The medical community has the opportunity to make an active effort to provide better resources for patients on YouTube., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Oncological equivalency of minimally-invasive partial nephrectomy compared to open partial nephrectomy (OPN) continues to be challenged by proponents of open urologic oncology surgery., Objective: To compare patterns of recurrence, recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival between patients who underwent open or minimally-invasive partial nephrectomy., Materials and Methods: Data from prospectively maintained databases from 2 urban quaternary referral centers was retrospectively collected from 2003 to 2018. Patients who underwent either open or minimally-invasive (laparoscopic or robotic-assisted) partial nephrectomy and found to have malignant pathology were included. The groups subsequently underwent propensity-score matching to ensure homogeneity prior to analysis. The primary outcomes were incidence of recurrence, time to recurrence, time from recurrence to death, location of recurrence, and recurrence-free survival. Secondary outcomes included overall survival and cancer-specific survival., Results: A total of 190 patients underwent OPN and 190 underwent minimally-invasive partial nephrectomy. Recurrence was more common in patients undergoing OPN (10% vs. 3.2%, P = 0.01), but surgical approach was not predictive of location of recurrence (P = 1) or time to recurrence (23.8 vs. 26.3 months, P = 0.73). All-cause mortality was more common in the OPN group (10.5% vs. 2.6%, P = 0.003). On multivariable analysis, only surgical approach was associated with increased risk for recurrence (OR 3.88, P = 0.009)., Conclusion: This propensity-score matched analysis of patients undergoing partial nephrectomy suggests that minimally invasive surgical approach is resulted in decreased risk of recurrence and overall survival, and does not increase the risk for atypical sites of recurrence., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between tumor complexity based on RENAL nephrometry score and complications., Methods: We retrospectively identified 2555 patients who underwent RPN for renal cell carcinoma. Major complication was defined as Clavien Grade ≥3. The relationship between baseline demographic, clinical characteristics, perioperative and postoperative outcomes, and tumor complexity were assessed using χ2 test of independence, Fisher's Exact Test and Kruskal Wallis Test. An unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression model was used to assess the relationship between major complication and demographic, clinical characteristics, and perioperative outcomes., Results: There was a significant relationship between tumor complexity and WIT (P<0.001), operative time (P<0.001), estimated blood loss (P<0.001), and major complication (P=0.019). However, there was no relationship with overall complications (P=0.237) and length of stay (LOS) (P=0.085). In the unadjusted model, higher tumor complexity was associated with major complication (P=0.009). Controlling for other variables, there was no significant difference between major complication and tumor complexity (low vs. moderate, P=0.142 and high, P=0.204). LOS (P<0.001) and operative time (P=0.025) remained a significant predictor of major complication in the adjusted model., Conclusions: Tumor complexity is not associated with an increase in overall or major complication rate after RPN. Experience in high-volume centers is demonstrating a standardization of low complications rates after RPN independent of tumor complexity.

Background: Salvage treatment for local recurrence after prior partial nephrectomy (PN) or local tumor ablation (LTA) for kidney cancer is, as of yet, poorly investigated., Objective: To classify the treatments and standardize the nomenclature of salvage robot-assisted renal surgery, to describe the surgical technique for each scenario, and to investigate complications, renal function, and oncologic outcomes., Design, Setting, and Participants: Sixty-seven patients underwent salvage robot-assisted renal surgery from October 2010 to December 2020 at nine tertiary referral centers., Surgical Procedure: Salvage robot-assisted renal surgery classified according to treatment type as salvage robot-assisted partial or radical nephrectomy (sRAPN or sRARN) and according to previous primary treatment (PN or LTA)., Measurements: Postoperative complications, renal function, and oncologic outcomes were assessed., Results and Limitations: A total of 32 and 35 patients underwent salvage robotic surgery following PN and LTA, respectively. After prior PN, two patients underwent sRAPN, while ten underwent sRARN for a metachronous recurrence in the same kidney. No intra- or perioperative complication occurred. For local recurrence in the resection bed, six patients underwent sRAPN, while 14 underwent sRARN. For sRAPN, the intraoperative complication rate was 33%; there was no postoperative complication. For sRARN, there was no intraoperative complication and the postoperative complication rate was 7%. At 3 yr, the local recurrence-free rates were 64% and 82% for sRAPN and sRARN, respectively, while the 3-yr metastasis-free rates were 80% and 79%, respectively. At 33 mo, the median estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) were 57 and 45 ml/min/1.73 m 2 for sRAPN and sRARN, respectively. After prior LTA, 35 patients underwent sRAPN and no patient underwent sRARN. There was no intraoperative complication; the overall postoperative complications rate was 20%. No local recurrence occurred. The 3-yr metastasis-free rate was 90%. At 43 mo, the median eGFR was 38 ml/min/1.73 m 2 . The main limitations are the relatively small population and the noncomparative design of the study., Conclusions: Salvage robot-assisted surgery has a safe complication profile in the hands of experienced surgeons at high-volume institutions, but the risk of local recurrence in this setting is non-negligible., Patient Summary: Patients with local recurrence after partial nephrectomy or local tumor ablation should be aware that further treatment with robot-assisted surgery is not associated with a worrisome complication profile, but also that they are at risk of further recurrence., (Copyright © 2021 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction and Objective: Robot-assisted radical nephrectomy (RRN) is increasingly utilized as an alternative to laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN), but there are concerns over costs and objective benefit. In the setting of very large renal masses (>10 cm), comparison between techniques is limited and it is unclear whether a robotic approach confers any perioperative benefit over LRN or open radical nephrectomy (ORN). In this study, perioperative outcomes of RRN, LRN, and ORN for very large renal masses are compared. Methods: Using the National Cancer Database, patients were identified who underwent radical nephrectomy for kidney tumors >10 cm diagnosed from 2010 to 2015. Patients were analyzed according to surgical approach. Perioperative outcomes, including conversion to open, length of stay, readmission rates, positive surgical margins, and 30- and 90-day mortality were compared among cohorts. Results: A total of 9288 patients met inclusion criteria (RRN = 842, LRN = 2326, ORN = 6120). Compared with ORN, recipients of RRN or LRN had similar rates of 30-day readmission and 30- and 90-day mortality. Length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in RRN (-1.73 days ±0.19; p  < 0.0001) and LRN (-1.40 days ±0.12; p  < 0.0001) compared with ORN. LRN had a higher rate of conversion to open compared with RRN (odds ratio 1.48; 95% confidence interval 1.10-1.98; p  = 0.0087). Conversion to open from RRN or LRN added 1.3 additional days of inpatient stay. Over the study period, RRN use increased from 4.1% to 14.8%, LRN from 20.9% to 25.6%, whereas ORN use decreased from 75% to 59.6%. Conclusions: Minimally invasive approaches are increasingly utilized in very large renal masses. RRN has lower rates of conversion to open but produces comparable perioperative outcomes to LRN. Minimally invasive approaches have a shorter length of inpatient stay but otherwise report similar surgical margin status, readmission rates, and mortality rates compared with ORN.

Recent innovations in systemic therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have occurred at a break-neck pace. In the 1980s, nontargeted cytokine-mediated immunotherapy was the systemic therapy of choice. Based on improvements in tolerability and patient outcomes, targeted antiangiogenic agents supplanted cytokines in the early 2000s. During the last decade, the most recent innovation has come in the form of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), a form of immunotherapy that enhances immune-mediated tumor cell destruction. ICIs improve on all prior iterations of systemic therapies and have become the first-line therapy for many mRCC indications. ICIs have been shown to increase overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and complete response rate (CRR) in mRCC patients. We reviewed the recent trends associated with ICI management of mRCC, their immune-related adverse events, and cost implications., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Following partial nephrectomy (PN), it is important to prevent any deterioration in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). At present there are no evidence-based recommendations on when a nephrology consultation should be requested and how to adjust postoperative management when the risk of renal function decline is high. In an effort to address this void, we used our previously published nomogram to define risk groups for a significant decline in eGFR at 3-15 mo after PN. We used the nomogram-derived probability as the independent variable for the classification and regression tree and identified four risk groups: low (0-10%), intermediate (10-21%), high (21-65%), and very high (65-100%). Overall, 336 (34%), 386 (39%), 243 (24%), and 34 (4%) patients fell in the low, intermediate, high, and very high risk groups, respectively. The rates of significant eGFR decline across the low, intermediate, high, and very high risk groups were 4%, 14%, 29%, and 79%. With the low risk category as a reference, the hazard ratio for eGFR decline was 3.21 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.83-5.64) for the intermediate, 7.80 (95% CI 4.52-13.48) for the high, and 27.24 (95% CI 13.8-53.8) for the very high risk group (all p<0.001). These prognostic risk categories can be used to design postoperative follow-up schedules. A multidisciplinary approach can be considered for patients at high and very high risk of eGFR decline. PATIENT SUMMARY: We propose a new stratification system to identify individuals at high risk of a decline in renal function after robotic partial nephrectomy., (Copyright © 2019 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: In some cases, preservation of adrenal gland could be at risk in patients with cT1 and cT2 RCC. The aim of this study was to evaluate tumor-related factors that can potentially increase the risk of simultaneous adrenalectomy during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (RALRN) in patients with cT1-cT2 disease and the impact of performing such procedure on recurrence-free survival (RFS) and complication rates., Methods: We used a multi-institutional kidney cancer database where we identified patients who underwent RALRN with or without adrenalectomy. We evaluated the tumor-related characteristics that could potentially increase the risk of adrenal gland resection of these patients. We also reported RFS at 12-24 months of follow-up, which was compared with an inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) multivariable cox proportional hazards regression model and postoperative complications, which was compared with an IPTW multivariable logistic regression model., Results: Tumor size, cT stage, pT stage, histologic subtype, sarcomatoid differentiation, BMI, lymph node involvement, metastatic disease, Fuhrman grade do not increase the risk of simultaneous adrenalectomy during RALRN. Moreover, RALRN with adrenalectomy had no significant benefit in RFS. No differences in post-operative complications were noted., Conclusions: Our evaluated tumor-related characteristics did not show to impact the incidence of simultaneous adrenalectomy. Adrenal gland resection T does not provide significant benefit in recurrence-free survival. We consider that RALRN with adrenalectomy should be reserved only for patients with adrenal compromise as stated previously regardless that it has shown to be a safe procedure.

Objective: To examine socio-demographic and treatment variables in an attempt to identify factors associated with survival differences between black and white patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC)., Patients and Methods: We identified 79,618 white and 10,604 black patients diagnosed with RCC in the National Cancer Database. We compared the distribution of socio-demographic, presentation and treatment variables between Blacks and Whites and then utilized a multivariable cox proportion hazards regression model to evaluate the contribution of differences in these variables to disparities in overall survival (OS)., Results: Black patients were younger (60 vs. 63 years, P< 0.001) and with a lower stage (12.0% vs. 18.8% Stage III-IV P< 0.001). Blacks presented with a higher Charlson-Deyo score (P< 0.001), lower income (P< 0.001), lower education (P< 0.001) and were less likely to receive radical nephrectomy and systemic therapy for stage IV RCC (29.9% vs. 38.8%, P< 0.001). Unadjusted OS was lower for Whites (5-year survival 79% for Blacks and 77% for Whites). However, OS was lower for Blacks when adjusted for all variables (5-year survival 89% for Blacks and 93% for Whites). On multivariable analysis, black race was independently associated with worse OS, HR: 1.09 (95% confidence interval: 1.03, 1.14, P= 0.002). A sensitivity analysis including patients with complete data on tumor grade confirmed our results., Conclusion: Our study indicates that black patients present at a younger age and with lower stage RCC, but have worse OS. Blacks experienced disparities in socio-demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, treatment-related factors, and had an independently increased hazard of death., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: To analyze the volumetric changes of the ipsilateral and contralateral kidneys and their effect on functional outcome post partial nephrectomy using segmentation analysis., Patients and Methods: We have analyzed the data of 119 patients from a single surgeon series of partial nephrectomy patients. Median follow-up was 11.40 months. Patients with bilateral tumors, and solitary kidney were excluded from analysis. Volumetric measurements were performed using a semiautomated tissue segmentation tool. A simple linear regression model to assess the predictors for parenchymal volume loss (PVL). A multivariable linear regression model was used to evaluate the association between PVL and warm ischemia time (WIT), controlling for other factors., Results: Mean WIT was 12.09 ± 4.40 minutes and the mean percentage decrease in the volume of the operated kidney was 16.99 ± 13.49%. WIT (β = 1.24, P < 0.001) and tumor complexity (simple vs. intermediate, β = 0.06, P = 0.984; simple vs. high, β = 11.62,P = 0.007) were associated with PVL. A 1 minute increase in WIT was associated with an increase in the percentage volume loss in the operated kidney by 1.38% (β = 1.20, P < 0.001). Patients with high tumor complexity (β = 11.17, P = 0.009) had a significantly higher percentage volume loss compared to patients with simple tumor complexity. Ipsilateral PVL (β = -0.35, P = 0.015) and male gender (β = -9.89, P = 0.021) were associated with change in eGFR. After adjusting for confounders, % volume loss (β = -0.32, P < 0.001) remained a significant predictor for contralateral hypertrophy., Conclusion: Tumor complexity results in higher WIT and increased PVL as measured by volumetric segmentation. PVL is a key factor associated with functional outcome, and is directly linked to WIT. Increased PVL is also associated with decreased contralateral hypertrophy. Prospective studies with larger samples sizes will be required to validate our findings., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Closed drains have traditionally been placed after partial nephrectomy because of risks of bleeding and urine leak. We sought to study the safety of a nonroutine drain (NRD) approach after transperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN). Patients and Methods: From a multi-institutional database, we have analyzed the data of 904 patients who underwent RPN. Five hundred forty-six (60.40%) patients underwent RPN by a surgeon who routinely placed drains. Three hundred fifty-eight (39.60%) patients underwent RPN by a surgeon who did not routinely placed drains. Perioperative outcomes, length of stay (LOS), and readmission rates were compared between the two groups. Baseline characteristics, perioperative, and postoperative outcomes were compared using Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, and Fisher's exact test. Results: Patients in the NRD group were more likely to have higher body mass index (30.10 kg/m 2 vs 28.07 kg/m 2 ; P  < 0.001), higher tumor size (3.0 cm vs 2.5 cm; P  = 0.001), and higher renal score (8 vs 7; P  < 0.001). Rate of transfusion (0.00% NRD vs 0.56% RD; P  = 0.157) and overall complication (7.33% NRD vs 7.82% RD; P  = 0.782) were comparable. Median hospital stay is 1 day for both groups. Readmission rate was also similar (0.55% NRD vs 1.40% RD; P  = 0.279). In a multivariable analysis, NRD approach was associated with shorter length of hospital stay (incidence rate ratio [IRR] - 0.72, P  < 0.001). Conclusion: An NRD approach for RPN yielded a decreased LOS and similar perioperative outcomes. Placement of surgical drains should be based on individual circumstances, and not required on a routine basis.

Hilar tumors pose unique challenges during partial nephrectomy. We present the characteristics and outcomes of 263 patients with hilar tumors undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RPN) in the largest series to date. Perioperative, pathologic, functional, and oncological outcomes were compared between 1467 (84.8%) patients with a non-hilar tumor and 263 (15.2%) patients with a hilar tumor undergoing RPN. Variables were compared in univariable (unadjusted) analysis and using multivariable linear, logistic, poisson, cox proportional hazards and linear mixed effects regression models adjusting for tumor diameter and RENAL Nephrometry score. Hilar tumors were larger (3.7 vs. 3.0 cm, p < 0.001) and more complex (RENAL Score 9 vs. 7, p < 0.001), leading to longer operative time (186 vs. 161 min, p < 0.001), ischemia time (18 vs. 15, p < 0.001), greater blood loss (150 vs. 100 ml, p < 0.001), eGFR decline at discharge (∆ = 3.9%, p = 0.035) and eGFR decline per month up to 36 months post-RPN (β = - 0.25; p = 0.017). In multivariable analysis, hilar tumors were only associated with a 10% increase in operative time (p ≤ 0.001) and marginally worse eGFR decline over time (β = - 0.19, p = 0.076), with no differences in other outcomes analyzed including ischemia time, blood loss, complication rate, recurrence-free survival, or eGFR decline at discharge. Although hilar tumors were found to be larger and more anatomically complex, there were only marginal differences in outcome when compared to non-hilar tumors. A hilar renal tumor should be considered for partial nephrectomy when feasible without an expected increase in complications or adverse events.

Objective: To determine the effect of positive surgical margins (PSMs) on oncologic outcomes following robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and to identify factors that increase the likelihood of adverse oncologic outcomes. Methods: A multi-institutional database of patients who underwent RAPN with complete follow-up data was used to compare recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) between 42 (5.1%) patients with a PSM and 797 (94.9%) patients with a negative surgical margin. Analysis was performed with univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models adjusting for confounding variables. A Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate the relationship between PSM and oncologic outcomes (RFS and OS), and the equality of the curves was assessed using a log-rank test. Results: The rate of PSM was 5.1%. RFS at 12, 24, and 36 months was 97.8%, 95.2%, and 92.9%. OS at 12, 24, and 36 months was 98.6%, 97.7%, and 93.3%. PSM was not associated with worse RFS in both univariable and multivariable analyses (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.43; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.37, 5.55; p  = 0.607). Factors associated with worse RFS include pT3a upstaging (HR = 4.97; 95% CI = 1.63, 15.12; p  = 0.005), a higher Charlson comorbidity index (HR = 1.68; 95% CI = 1.20, 2.34; p  = 0.002); and advanced clinical stage (cT1a vs cT1b, HR = 4.22; 95% CI = 1.84, 9.68; p  = 0.001 vs cT2a, HR = 14.09; 95% CI = 3.85, 51.53; p  < 0.001). PSM was not associated with worse OS in both univariable and multivariable analyses (HR = 0.87; 95% CI = 0.26, 2.94; p  = 0.821). Higher R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score was found to be associated with worse OS (HR = 1.26; 95% CI = 1.01, 1.57; p  = 0.041). Conclusions: Given the absence of association between PSM and worse oncologic outcomes, patients with PSM following RAPN should be carefully monitored for recurrence rather than undergo immediate secondary intervention. As advanced clinical stage (cT1b, cT2a) and pathologic upstaging (pT3a) were independently associated with disease recurrence, their presence may warrant more attentive postoperative surveillance.

Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility of postoperative day 1 (POD1) discharge after robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) and to determine whether a protocol targeting a shorter length of stay (LOS) is associated with any difference in the rate of postoperative complications. Materials and Methods: We reviewed a prospectively maintained, multi-institutional database of patients who underwent RPN from September 2013 to September 2016. Three of the six participating surgeons used a protocol that targeted discharge on POD1, whereas three surgeons did not. Patient characteristics and postoperative complication rates between the two groups were compared. Results: A total of 665 patients were included, 455 of whom were treated by surgeons utilizing a POD1 discharge protocol, whereas 210 were not. The mean LOS for those in the POD1 protocol group was 1.13 days vs 2.02 days in the non-protocol group. Between groups, there were no differences in age ( p  = 0.098), body mass index ( p  = 0.164), tumor size ( p  = 0.502), or R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry score ( p  = 0.974), but POD1 discharge protocol patients had higher age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity score (4 vs 2, p  = 0.033), were less likely to have a hilar tumor (15.9% vs 23.1%, p  = 0.03), and had a larger percent decrease in discharge estimated glomerular filtration rate (-15.9% vs -7.1%, p  < 0.001). There were no differences in the rates of overall ( p  = 0.715), major ( p  = 0.164), medical ( p  = 0.089), or surgical complications ( p  = 0.301) or in complications by the Clavien-Dindo category ( p  = 0.13). Conclusion: Discharge on POD1 after RPN is feasible, reproducible by different surgeons, and not associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications.

Introduction: Clinically, the papillary (pRCC) and chromophobe (chRCC) histologic subtypes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are viewed as more indolent compared to the more-common clear cell histology (ccRCC). However, there remain advanced cases of these purportedly less-aggressive histologies that lead to significant mortality. We therefore sought to evaluate outcomes of advanced pRCC and chRCC compared to ccRCC utilizing the National Cancer Database's registry of RCC patients., Materials and Methods: A total of 115,365 ccRCC patients, 28,344 pRCC patients, and 11,942 chRCC patients met eligibility criteria. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method (median follow-up 3.6 years). OS was compared between stage III and IV ccRCC, pRCC, and chRCC using multivariable Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for clinical and treatment characteristics., Results: A total of 25.7% of ccRCC patients, 14.1% of pRCC patients, and 14.8% of chRCC patients had stage III to IV disease. The 5-year OS for stage III ccRCC, pRCC, and chRCC was 66.9%, 63.6%, and 80.5%, respectively. The 5-year OS for stage IV ccRCC, pRCC and chRCC was 19.7%, 13.3%, and 22.0%, respectively. The hazard of death was significantly higher for stage IV pRCC vs. ccRCC (hazard ratio = 1.29; 95% confidence interval = 1.19, 1.39; P < 0.01) and similar for stage IV chRCC vs. ccRCC (hazard ratio = 1.01; 95% confidence interval = 0.85, 1.21; P = 0.885)., Conclusions: pRCC and chRCC are rare but similarly fatal compared to ccRCC when advanced or metastatic. With most clinical trials devoted toward ccRCC, greater efforts to identify aggressive variants and treatment strategies for metastatic pRCC and chRCC are necessary., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Performing partial nephrectomy (PN) on a cT1 tumor, which postoperatively is upgraded to pT3a can possibly lead to compromise of cancer specific mortality. We therefore aimed to identify risk factors for pathologic T3a upstaging of cT1 tumors and to analyze the association between upstaging, positive surgical margins (PSM) and overall survival (OS)., Methods: The present study included patients who underwent PN for a clinically localized T1 renal mass from two datasets: 1) 1298 patients from a prospectively maintained multi-center database (MCDB); and 2) 7940 patients from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Multivariable logistic regression models within each cohort were used to identify predictors of cT1 to pT3a upstaging and its association with PSM. Cox proportion hazards regression models were used to compare overall survival in the NCDB cohort., Results: The rate of pT3a upstaging was 5.7% (N.=74) in the MCDB and 1.9% (N.=156) in the NCDB cohort. Older age (MCDB OR=1.04, P=0.001; NCDB OR=1.04, P=0.001) and larger tumor size (MCDB OR=1.89, P<0.001; NCDB OR=1.38, P<0.001) increased the likelihood of upstaging. PSM was found to be more likely for pT3a upstaged patients in both cohorts (MCDB 14.9% vs. 3.5%, P<0.001; NCDB 14.8% vs. 8.3%, P=0.006), even when adjusting for tumor size. At short term follow-up (NCDB median follow-up 27.3 months), pT3a upstaging was associated with worse OS in univariable (HR=1.89; 95% CI=1.00, 3.55; P=0.049) but not multivariable analysis (HR=1.63; 95% CI=0.86, 3.08; P=0.131). OS was 93.0% vs. 95.8% at 3 years for those with and without pT3a upstaging, respectively., Conclusions: Larger tumor size and increased age are associated with pathological upstaging to T3a for clinical T1 tumors treated with partial nephrectomy. Steps to improve identification of occult pT3a disease are necessary as its occurrence significantly increased the likelihood of a PSM, both in a high-volume multicenter cohort, as well as, a national data registry.

Background: Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) is a common occurrence after partial nephrectomy and is a significant risk factor for chronic kidney disease. We aimed to create a model that predicts postoperative AKI in patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN)., Methods: We identified 1,190 patients who underwent RAPN between 2008 and 2017 from a multicenter database. AKI was defined as a >25% reduction in eGFR from pre-RAPN to discharge. A nomogram was built based on a binary logistic regression that ultimately included age, sex, BMI, diabetes, baseline eGFR, and RENAL Nephrometry score. Internal validation was performed using the leave-one-out cross validation. Calibration was graphically investigated. The decision curve analysis was used to evaluate the net clinical benefit; a classification tree was used to identify risk categories. The same model was fit adding ischemia time during RAPN., Results: Median (IQR) age at surgery was 61 (50, 68) years; 505 (42%) patients were female, while 685 (58%) were male. Median (IQR) ischemia time during RAPN was 14 (10, 18) min. postoperative AKI occurred in 274 (23%) patients. All variables fitted in the model emerged as predictors of AKI (all P ≤ 0.005) and all were considered to build a nomogram. After internal validation, the area under the curve was 73%. The model demonstrated excellent calibration and improved clinical risk prediction at the decision curve analysis. In the low, intermediate, and high-risk groups the postoperative AKI rates were: 10%, 30%, and 48%, respectively. Adding ischemia time to the preoperative model fit the data better (likelihood ratio test: P < 0.001) and yielded an incremental area under the curve of 3% (95% confidence interval: 1, 5%) CONCLUSION: We developed a nomogram that accurately predicts AKI in patients undergoing RAPN. This model might serve (1) in the preoperative setting: for counsel patients according to their preoperative AKI risk (2) in the immediate postoperative: for identifying patients who would benefit from an early multidisciplinary evaluation, when considering also ischemia time., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To determine the safety and efficacy of performing partial nephrectomy (PN) on patients with high nephrometry score tumors., Patients and Methods: We used a prospectively maintained multi-institutional kidney cancer database to identify 144 patients with R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score ≥10 who underwent PN for a cT1-cT2 renal mass. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics, tumor characteristics, perioperative, and pathological outcomes were analyzed and reported. Trifecta achievement, defined by warm ischemia time <25 minutes, no perioperative complications, and negative surgical margins, was the primary outcome. We assessed the relationship of baseline clinical and tumor characteristics data to trifecta achievement and perioperative complications., Results: Baseline median eGFR was 84.57 ml/min/1.73 m 2 , with 119 (84.39%) patients having normal baseline kidney function. The median clinical tumor size was 4.95 cm, with 74 (51.75%) being completely endophytic and 58 (41.73%) located on the hilum. The median ischemia time was 20 minutes. Median estimated blood loss was 150 ml. Twelve patients (8.33%) had intraoperative complications. No patient had a conversion to open surgery. Postoperative, perioperative, and major complication rate were 10.42%, 17.3%, and 2.34% respectively. Thirty-six patients (37.89%) developed postoperative acute kidney injury and 28 (20.90%) developed new-onset CKD at a median follow-up of 6 months. Eight patients (5.56%) had a positive surgical margin. Trifecta was achieved in 89 (61.81%) patients. There was no significant difference in baseline, clinical, and tumor characteristics between those that achieved trifecta and in those where trifecta was not. Pathologic tumor stage was the only factor significantly associated with trifecta achievement (P = 0.025)., Conclusion: In treating complex renal tumors, PN should be performed when possible. Although this remains a challenging procedure, with experience and appropriate case selection, the trifecta outcome can be achieved in a significant number of patients with high renal score lesions., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

To evaluate peri- and post-operative outcomes after robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) in patients with a solitary kidney. A multi-institutional database of 1868 patients was used to identify 35 patients with a solitary kidney who underwent RPN at six different centers from 2007 to 2016. Peri-operative outcomes were summarized with descriptive statistics. We assessed the change in eGFR over time with a linear mixed-effects model. Median operative time, ischemia time, and estimated blood loss were 172 min, 16 min, and 113 mL, respectively. There were no positive surgical margins. The median length of stay was 1 day (range 1-7), and over half (54.3%) of patients were discharged one post-operative day 1. Seven post-operative complications occurred in six patients (17.1%); of which four were Clavien I, two were Clavien II, and one was Clavien III. The linear decline in eGFR up to 24 month post-RPN was marginal and not significant (ß = - 0.14; 95% CI = - 0.51, 0.23; p = 0.453), with predicted mean eGFR decreasing from 59.2 to 55.8 mL/min/1.73 m 2 at 24 months. These results suggest that, in patients with a solitary kidney, RPN is a safe and feasible treatment option. In patients with a solitary kidney, RPN did not significantly compromise renal function for up to 2 years after surgery.

Introduction: As the prevalence of obesity increases worldwide, an increasing proportion of surgical candidates have an elevated body mass index (BMI), with associated metabolic syndrome. Yet there exists limited evidence regarding the effect of elevated BMI on surgical outcomes in robotic surgeries. We examined whether obese patients had worse perioperative outcomes and postoperative renal function after robotic partial nephrectomies (RPNs). Materials and Methods: We performed a multi-institutional analysis of 1770 patients who underwent RPNs between 2008 and 2015, allowing time for the data set to mature. Associations between BMI, as a continuous and categorical variable, and perioperative outcomes, acute kidney injury (AKI, >25% reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]) at discharge, and change in eGFR per month were analyzed. AKI and eGFR were evaluated using multivariable logistic and linear regression models adjusted for confounders, including age, Charlson comorbidity index, tumor size, and the identity of the surgeon. Results: In total 45.2% ( n  = 529) of patients were found to be obese, with a greater prevalence of hypertension and diabetes in overweight and obese patients. Obese patients were more likely to have malignant tumors (>77% vs 68%, p  < 0.001) and trended toward having larger tumors (3.0 cm vs 2.8 cm; p  = 0.061). Heavier patients required longer operative times (166-196 minutes vs 155 minutes; p  < 0.001), although equivalent warm ischemia times ( p  = 0.873). Obesity did not correlate with an increased complication rate ( p  > 0.05). On multivariable analysis, obesity (odds ratio [OR] = 1.81; p  = 0.031), male sex (OR = 1.54; p  = 0.028), and larger tumor size (OR = 1.23; p  < 0.001) were associated with a significant increase in the likelihood of AKI at discharge. BMI above normal weight was not associated with greater eGFR decline per month post-RPN. Conclusions: Obesity was associated with equivalent perioperative outcomes and long-term renal function. Further research is warranted into how obesity and metabolic syndrome may foster a more aggressive tumor environment. RPN appears to be an equally safe operative option for patients regardless of obesity status.

Background: Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) is known as an indolent tumor; however, mortality still occurs. We sought to determine the clinicopathologic and genomic factors associated with aggressive chRCC., Patients and Methods: Two different datasets were used to identify patients with clinical stage III and IV chRCC. Eighteen patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and 1693 patients from the American College of Surgeons National Cancer Database (NCDB) were used for analysis. From the TCGA, RNA-Seq expression analysis of 18,745 genes was conducted between the recurrent (n = 5; 27.8%) and nonrecurrent patients (n = 13; 72.2%). Biological significance was identified via pathway enrichment and gene function analyses. From the NCDB, Cox proportion hazards regression models were used to identify variables associated with overall survival (OS) at a median follow-up of 41.4 months., Results: Between the 2 groups, 2182 genes were differentially expressed. The most commonly overexpressed pathways were neuroactive ligand-receptor interactions and cytokine-cytokine receptor interactions. The most activated gene functions were cellular, metabolic, and multicellular organismal processes. In the NCDB, multivariable analysis, age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.05; P < .001), TNM stage IV versus III (HR, 3.86; 95% CI, 2.98-5.00; P < .001), and positive surgical margin (HR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.45-1.96; P < .001) were associated with worse OS at a median follow-up of 41.4 months. Five-year OS was significantly lower for stage IV patients compared with stage III patients (80.0% vs. 29.9%; P < .001)., Conclusions: Patients with recurrent chRCC demonstrated a differential gene expression of specific biochemical pathways. Clinical parameters associated with worse OS included age, stage, and positive surgical margin., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: To evaluate outcomes after focal ablative therapy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in transplant allograft kidneys., Methods: After institutional review board approval, patients with a history of RCC in a transplanted allograft kidney who underwent focal ablative therapy were identified. Complete chart reviews were performed and the relevant data were extracted for cumulative analysis., Results: Six patients were treated with focal ablative therapy for RCC in a transplanted allograft kidney at our institutional between 2010 and 2017. Masses were diagnosed at a median of 8 years (range 1 month-8 years) after transplantation. Median mass size was 3 cm. Three patients were treated with microwave ablation, 1 with percutaneous irreversible electroporation, 1 with laparoscopic cryoablation, and 1 with open cryoablation. Median follow-up was 45 months (range 8-61 months). The median creatinine level was 1.65 before ablation and 1.58 1 year after ablation. No patients required dialysis after ablation. No patients developed local recurrence during the follow-up period. However, 1 patient developed lymph node metastases 4 years after ablation. Two patients died during follow-up of other causes. At the time of death both patients had functioning grafts., Conclusion: Focal ablative therapies are a feasible, renal-sparing intervention for the management of RCC in renal allografts at intermediate-term follow-up., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To compare the perioperative and renal functional outcome between transperitoneal and retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy (TP-RPN and RP-RPN) in the largest cohort to date of RP-RPN for posterior tumors., Methods: We identified 519 patients who met eligibility criteria and underwent TP-RPN (n = 357, 68.8%) or RP-RPN (n = 162, 31.2%) for a posteriorly located cT1 tumor. Patients were propensity score (PS) matched on preoperative and tumor-specific characteristics. Perioperative outcome and renal function outcome at median follow-up 22 months were compared., Results: Between the PS matched TP-RPN (n = 157, 50%) and RP-RPN (n = 157, 50%) patients, operative time (OT) (185.0 versus 157.0, P < .001) was longer in TP-RPN versus RP-RPN patients. No significant differences in ischemia time (P = .618), blood loss (P = .178), positive surgical margins (P = .501), overall postoperative complications (P = .861), or progression of chronic kidney disease stage at median 22 months (P = .599) were identified. Length of stay (LOS) was reduced in RP-RPN patients (P = .017), but was not different once an institution used a postoperative day (POD)-1 discharge protocol (P = .579). Operative times were similar between groups in patients with obesity (P = .293) or a cT1b renal mass (P = 908)., Conclusion: RP-RPN for posterior tumors resulted in reduced OT and a shorter LOS compared to TP-RPN. When surgeons aimed to routinely discharge patients on POD-1, the surgical approach did not influence LOS. Operative time was similar between RP and TP-RPN among patients with obesity or a cT1b renal mass. All other measures, including ischemia time, blood loss, margin rates, complications, and renal function, did not differ between the two approaches.

Introduction: Functional volume loss (FVL) is a significant predictor of kidney function decline after partial nephrectomy (PN). Here, we sought to assess two different methods for quantifying FVL post-PN: imaging-based tissue segmentation (TS) vs pathological analysis., Methods and Results: From a single surgeon series, we performed a retrospective analysis of 42 patients who underwent PN for a cT1 renal mass between 2015 and 2017. The association between TS and pathological analysis at a median follow-up of 6 months (range: 3-9 months) was evaluated using Spearman's correlation. The association between pathological analysis, TS analysis, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline at 6 months was evaluated using a multivariable linear mixed-effects models. For pathological analysis, dimensions of the specimen and tumor were extracted from pathology reports. FVL was calculated as [specimen volume (Length*Width*Height*π/6) - tumor volume (Length*Width*Height* π/6)]. For TS analysis, preoperative cross-sectional imaging was used (MRI n = 20; CT n = 22). FVL was calculated as [(overall kidney volume) - (tumor volume) - (cyst volume of renal cysts >1 cm)]. Postoperative functional volume was subtracted from preoperative functional volume to assess FVL post-PN for TS method., Results: eGFR significantly decreased from baseline to postoperative 6 months (-5.1 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ; p = 0.004). Even though there was a correlation between the two methods (coefficient = 0.245, p < 0.001), pathological analysis underestimated volume loss (32.2 mL vs 5.76 mL, p < 0.001). In multivariate linear regression analysis, TS analysis was significantly associated with a decline in eGFR (β = 0.084, 95% CI = -0.02, 0.15; p = 0.012), whereas pathological analysis was not (β = 0.02, 95% CI = -0.24, 0.28; p = 0.87)., Conclusion: Pathological analysis underestimates parenchymal volume loss. Only imaging-based TS method is associated with change in eGFR post-PN.

Background: Decreased functional outcome after partial nephrectomy is associated with overall mortality., Objective: To create a model that predicts ≥25% reduction from baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and to investigate the role of acute kidney injury (AKI) in this patient population., Design, Setting, and Participants: A total of 999 patients were identified from a multi-institutional database. Renal function was defined according to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines for chronic kidney disease (CKD). AKI was defined as >25% reduction in eGFR from pre-RAPN period to discharge., Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: A nomogram to predict significant eGFR reduction (≥25% from baseline) in the time-frame between 3 and 15mo after RAPN was built based on the coefficients of Cox survival function that ultimately included age, sex, Charlson comorbidity index, baseline eGFR, RENAL nephrometry score, AKI in patients with normal baseline renal function, and AKI on CKD. Such landmark analysis was chosen in order to account for eGFR fluctuations occurring within the first 3mo of RAPN. The proportional hazard assumption was evaluated through the Schönfeld test. Internal validation was performed using the leave-one-out cross validation. Calibration was graphically investigated. The decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the net clinical benefit., Results and Limitations: Median (interquartile range [IQR]) age at surgery was 61yr (51, 68). Overall, 146 patients experienced significant eGFR reduction; median follow-up for survivors was 12.4mo. The 15-mo probability of significant eGFR reduction was 19%. All variables fitted into the model, including AKI in patients with normal renal function (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.51; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.12, 6.60; p<0.001) and AKI on CKD (HR: 4.90; 95% CI: 2.17, 11.1; p<0.001), emerged as predictors of significant eGFR reduction (all p≤0.048) and were considered to build a nomogram. The internally validated c index was 73%. The model demonstrated excellent calibration and a net benefit at the DCA with probabilities ≥4%., Conclusions: We developed a nomogram that accurately predicts significant eGFR reduction after RAPN. This model may serve as a tool for early identification of patients at high risk for significant renal function decline after surgery., Patient Summary: We have developed a model for the prediction of renal function loss after partial nephrectomy for renal cancer., (Copyright © 2018 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To compare peri-operative outcomes after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for cT2a (7 to <10 cm) to cT1 tumours., Materials and Methods: Patients with a cT1a (n = 1 358, 76.4%), cT1b (n = 379, 21.3%) or cT2a (n = 41, 2.3%) renal mass were identified from a multi-institutional RAPN database. Intra- and postoperative outcomes were compared for cT2a masses vs cT1a and cT1b masses using multivariable regression models (linear, logistic, Poisson etc.), adjusting for operating surgeon and a modified R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score that excluded the radius component., Results: The median sizes for cT1a, cT1b and cT2a tumours were 2.5, 5.0 and 8.0 cm, respectively (P < 0.001) with modified R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores being 6.0, 6.5 and 7.0, respectively (cT1a, P < 0.001; cT1b, P = 0.105). RAPN for cT2a vs cT1a masses was associated with a 12% increase in operating time (P < 0.001), a 32% increase in estimated blood loss (P < 0.001), a 7% increase in ischaemia time (P = 0.008), a 3.93 higher odds of acute kidney injury at discharge (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33, 8.76; P = 0.009) and a higher risk of recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 10.9, 95% CI 1.31, 92.2; P = 0.027). RAPN for cT2a vs cT1b masses was associated with a 12% increase in blood loss (P = 0.036), a 5% increase in operating time (P = 0.062) and a marginally higher risk of recurrence (HR 11.2, 95% CI 0.77, 11.5; P = 0.059). RAPN for cT2a tumours was not associated with differences in complications (cT1a, P = 0.535; cT1b, P = 0.382), positive margins (cT1a, P = 0.972; cT1b, P = 0.681), length of stay (cT1a, P = 0.507; cT1b, P = 0.513) or renal function decline up to 24 months post-RAPN (cT1a, P = 0.124; cT1b, P = 0.467)., Conclusion: For T2a tumours RAPN is a feasible treatment option in a select patient population when performed by experienced surgeons in institutions equipped to manage postoperative complications. Although RAPN was associated with greater blood loss and longer operating and ischaemia time in T2a tumours, it was not associated with greater complication or positive surgical margin rates compared with T1 tumours. Renal function preservation rates were equivalent for up to 24 months postoperatively; however, 12-month recurrence-free survival was significantly lower in the T2a group. Extended follow-up is required to further evaluate long-term survival., (© 2018 The Authors BJU International © 2018 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: To evaluate and compare the accuracy of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in predicting the final pathologic tumor size of partial nephrectomy specimens., Materials and Methods: We analyzed a multi-institutional database of 807 patients who underwent robotic partial nephrectomy for a cT1a renal mass from 2006 to 2016. Patients who had a solitary tumor with complete data on the baseline imaging modality and the tumor size (baseline and pathologic) (n = 349) were included for analysis. Baseline tumor size evaluated by both imaging modalities, in addition to the difference between the measurements and final pathologic tumor size (cm) measurements, was compared between patients who received a baseline CT (n = 276, 79.1%) and those who received an MRI (n = 73, 20.9%)., Results: There were no statistically significant differences between any baseline characteristics and receipt of a CT versus MRI. In multivariable analysis adjusting for confounders, there was no significant difference in the baseline tumor size between patients receiving an MRI and those receiving a CT (2.3 versus 2.6 cm; β = -0.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.33 to 0.07; P = .208). Tumor size on imaging was smaller from final pathology by 0.43 cm on average (P = .002). Measurement error for the measured baseline versus actual pathologic tumor size did not significantly differ for patients receiving an MRI versus those receiving a CT (0.38 versus 0.44 cm; β = -0.06; 95% CI = -0.16 to 0.04; P = .232)., Conclusion: Baseline renal tumor size measurements were not significantly different for CT scan and MRI. Choice of imaging modality can be based on doctor and patient preference, including cost and exposure to radiation.

Objective: The majority of patients undergoing partial nephrectomy (PN) present with a clinical T1a tumor with both kidneys present. Some groups have advocated using off-clamp (Off-C) techniques to eliminate warm ischemia whenever possible, even when elective. We evaluated whether Off-C technique during robotic PN (RPN) provides any functional benefit over main arterial clamping (MAC) in these patients. Subjects/Patients and Methods: A total of 351 patients with a R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score (RNS) <10, T1a tumor, and two kidneys who underwent RPN from five high-volume surgeons between 2008 and 2016 were retrospectively identified from a multi-institutional database. MAC and Off-C patients were 2 to 1 nearest neighbor propensity score matched on tumor size, RNS, % endophytic, tumor location, age, gender, body mass index, comorbidities, baseline estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs), and surgeon performing the RPN. Preoperative, surgical, and postoperative outcomes were compared., Results: After propensity score matching, 82 MAC and 41 Off-C RPN patients were compared with no remaining statistically significant differences in baseline demographic or tumor-specific characteristics, including tumor size (p = 0.203) or RNS (p = 0.744). There were no significant differences in complications (p = 0.141), positive surgical margins (p = 0.625), or non-neoplastic parenchymal volume removed (p = 0.138). Off-C RPN had significantly higher estimated blood loss (100 mL vs 50 mL, p < 0.001), but no increased rate of transfusion (p = 0.328). There were no significant differences in rates of acute kidney injury (p = 0.132) nor percentage change in eGFRs (p = 0.763) at discharge. Freedom from progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage was 87.7% for MAC and 91.1% for Off-C at 12 months. The percentage change in eGFRs (p = 0.457) and CKD stage progression (p = 0.866) was not different at last follow-up (median 9.2 months)., Conclusion: Our data showed that the use of Off-C RPN marginally increased blood loss without providing a renal function benefit. In two-kidney patients presenting with a T1a renal tumor, Off-C RPN may not be necessary.

Purpose: We evaluated the predictive value of the ACS NSQIP® (American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program®) surgical risk calculator in a tertiary referral cohort of patients who underwent robot-assisted partial nephrectomy., Materials and Methods: We queried our prospectively maintained, multi-institutional database of patients treated with robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and input the preoperative details of 300 randomly selected patients into the calculator. Accuracy of the calculator was assessed by the ROC AUC and the Brier score., Results: The observed rate of any complication in our cohort was 14% while the mean predicted rate of any complication using the calculator was 5.42%. The observed rate of serious complications (Clavien score 3 or greater) was 3.67% compared to the predicted rate of 4.89%. Low AUC and high Brier score were calculated for any complication (0.51 and 0.1272) and serious complications (0.55 and 0.0352, respectively). The calculated AUC was low for all outcomes, including venous thromboembolism (0.67), surgical site infection (0.51) and pneumonia (0.44)., Conclusions: The ACS NSQIP risk calculator poorly predicted and discriminated which patients would experience complications after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. These findings suggest the need for a more tailored outcome prediction model to better assist urologists risk stratify patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and counsel them on individual surgical risks., (Copyright © 2017 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Patients with end-stage renal disease are under increased risk for renal cell carcinoma development, and radical nephrectomy is the preferred treatment in this setting. Owing to the increased surgical morbidity and mortality, active surveillance (AS) may be a valid option for treatment of small renal masses (SRM). As there is a lack of high-level evidence for treatment recommendations, we performed a survey analysis to analyze the treatment patterns of transplant surgeons., Material and Methods: A 21-question online survey designed to analyze the practice patterns to treat SRM in renal transplant recipient candidates was sent to active transplant centers in the United States. The list of recipients to whom the survey was distributed was obtained with permission from the American Society of Transplant Surgeons., Results: We received 62 responses. All regions of United Network of Organ Sharing were represented. Radical nephrectomy was the preferred treatment (59%, n = 61), followed by AS (21.3%, n = 13), partial nephrectomy (14.8%, n = 9), and focal ablative therapy (4.9%, n = 3). Among the responders whose institutions did not allow AS, 77.4% indicated that if presented with long-term data showing safety of AS, they would perform immediate transplantation and monitor SRM. Responders were more likely to allow immediate transplantation after radical nephrectomy (77.4%), as opposed to partial nephrectomy (58.1%) and focal ablation (45.2%)., Conclusion: Though radical nephrectomy is the preferred treatment, most transplant surgeons would consider AS if long-term safety data were available., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: In recent years, molecular characterization of renal cell carcinoma has facilitated the identification of driver genes, specific molecular pathways, and characterization of the tumor microenvironment, which has led to a better understanding of the disease. This comprehension has revolutionized the treatment for patients with metastatic disease, but despite these advancements many patients will develop resistance leading to treatment failure. A primary cause of this resistance and subsequent treatment failure is tumor heterogeneity. We reviewed the literature on the mechanisms of tumor heterogeneity and its clinical implications., Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed using the MEDLINE/PubMed Index., Results: Intertumor and intratumor heterogeneity is possibly a reason for treatment failure and development of resistance. Specifically, the genetic profile of a renal tumor differs spatially within a tumor as well as among patients. Genomic mutations can change temporally with resistant subclones becoming dominant over time., Conclusions: Accounting for intratumor and intertumor heterogeneity with better sampling of cancer tissue is needed. This will hopefully lead to improved identification of driver mutations and actionable targets. Only then, we can move past the one-size-fits-all approach toward personalized treatment based on each individual׳s molecular profile., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To evaluate trends in peri-operative outcomes of 250 consecutive cases beyond the initial learning curve (LC) of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) among multiple surgeons., Patients and Methods: A multi-institutional database was used to evaluate trends in patient demographics (e.g. age, gender, comorbidities), tumour characteristics (e.g. size, complexity) and peri-operative outcomes (e.g. warm ischaemia time [WIT], operating time, complications, estimated blood loss [EBL], trifecta achievement) in consecutive cases 50-300 (n = 960) from 2008 to 2016 among four experienced surgeons. Trends in outcomes were assessed using multivariable regression models adjusted for demographic and tumour-specific variables. Outcomes for cases 50-99 were compared with those for cases 250-300., Results: In the study period RAPN was increasingly performed in patients with larger tumours (β = 0.001, P = 0.048), hypertension (odds ratio [OR] 1.003; P = 0.008) diabetes (OR 1.003; P = 0.025) and previous abdominal surgery (OR 1.003; P = 0.006). Surgeon experience was associated with more trifecta achievement (OR 1.006; P < 0.001), shorter WIT (β = -0.036, P < 0.001), less EBL (β = -0.154, P = 0.009), fewer blood transfusions (OR 0.989, P = 0.024) and a reduced length of hospital stay (β = -0.002, P = 0.002), but not with operating time (P = 0.243), complications (P = 0.587) or surgical margin status (P = 0.102). Tumour size and WIT in cases 50-99 vs 250-300 were 2.7 vs 3.2 cm (P = 0.001) and 21.4 vs 16.2 min (P < 0.001), respectively., Conclusion: Refinement of RAPN outcomes, concomitant with the treatment of a patient population with larger tumours and more comorbidities, occurs after the initial LC is reached. Although RAPN can consistently be performed safely with acceptable outcomes after a small number of cases, improvement in trifecta achievement, WIT, EBL, blood transfusions and a shorter hospitalization continues to occur up to 300 procedures., (© 2016 The Authors BJU International © 2016 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objectives: To assess the benefit of selective arterial clamping (SAC) as an alternative to main renal artery clamping (MAC) during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in patients without underlying chronic kidney disease (CKD)., Patients and Methods: Our study cohort comprised 665 patients without impaired renal function undergoing MAC (n = 589) or SAC (n = 76) during RAPN from four medical institutions in the period 2008-2015. We compared complication rates, positive surgical margin (PSM) rates, and peri-operative and intermediate-term renal functional outcome between 132 patients undergoing MAC and 66 undergoing SAC after 2-to-1 nearest-neighbour propensity-score matching for age, sex, body mass index, RENAL nephrometry score, tumour size, baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and warm ischaemia time (WIT)., Results: In propensity-score-matched patients, PSM (5.7 vs 3.0%; P = 0.407) and complication rates (13.8 vs 10.6%; P = 0.727) did not differ between the MAC and SAC groups. The incidence of acute kidney injury for MAC vs SAC (25.0 vs 32.0%; P = 0.315) within the first 30 days was similar. At a median follow-up of 7.5 months, the percentage reduction in eGFR (-9.3 vs -10.4%; P = 0.518) and progression to CKD ≥ stage 3 (7.2 vs 8.5%; P = 0.792) showed no difference., Conclusions: Our study findings show no difference in PSM rates, complication rates or intermediate-term renal functional outcomes between patients with unimpaired renal function who underwent SAC vs those who underwent MAC. When expected WIT is low, the routine use of SAC may not be necessary. Further studies will need to determine the role of SAC in patients with a solitary kidney or with significantly impaired renal function., (© 2016 The Authors BJU International © 2016 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction: Previous robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) studies have identified various predictors of overall and major postoperative complications, but few have evaluated the specific role of these factors in the development of medical and surgical complications. In this study, we present an analysis of the modifiable and nonmodifiable variables influencing medical and surgical complications in a contemporary series of patients who underwent RAPN and were followed in a prospectively maintained, multi-institutional kidney cancer database., Methods: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent RAPN at four institutions between 2008 and 2015 was performed. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine predictors of medical and surgical postoperative complications., Results: Data from 1139 patients were available for analysis. Sixty-seven patients (5.8%) experienced a medical postoperative complication, and 82 (7.1%) experienced a surgical complication. Decreasing baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (odds ratio [OR] = 0.98, p = 0.003), greater estimated blood loss (EBL) (OR = 1.002, p = 0.001), and operating surgeon (OR = 8.01, p < 0.001) were associated with an increased likelihood of surgical complications, while decreasing baseline eGFR (OR = 0.99, p = 0.054) and operating surgeon (OR = 1.96, p = 0.054) were associated with an increased likelihood of medical complications., Conclusion: We present complication risks in a large contemporary cohort of patients undergoing robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) with only 11.3% of patients experiencing a medical or surgical postoperative complication. Prospective candidates for robotic PN with poor baseline renal function and/or risk factors for greater EBL, including a high body mass index, or a complex renal mass should be counseled appropriately on their increased risk for a medical or surgical postoperative complication.